Patent Grant
10598958
1. Field of the Invention
A device and methods for sealing and encapsulation for biocompatible energization elements are described. In some examples, a field of use for the device and methods for sealing and encapsulation for biocompatible energization elements may include any biocompatible device or product that requires energy.
2. Description of the Related Art
Recently, the number of medical devices and their functionality has begun to rapidly develop. These medical devices may include, for example, implantable pacemakers, electronic pills for monitoring and/or testing a biological function, surgical devices with active components, contact lenses, infusion pumps, and neurostimulators. Added functionality and an increase in performance to many of the aforementioned medical devices has been theorized and developed. However, to achieve the theorized added functionality, many of these devices now require self-contained energization means that are compatible with the size and shape requirements of these devices, as well as the energy requirements of the new energized components.
Some medical devices may include electrical components such as semiconductor devices that perform a variety of functions and may be incorporated into many biocompatible and/or implantable devices. However, such semiconductor components require energy and, thus, energization elements should preferably also be included in such biocompatible devices. The topology and relatively small size of the biocompatible devices may create challenging environments for the definition of various functionalities. In many examples, it may be important to provide safe, reliable, compact and cost effective means to energize the semiconductor components within the biocompatible devices. Therefore, a need exists for biocompatible energization elements formed for implantation within or upon biocompatible devices where the structure of the millimeter or smaller sized energization elements provides enhanced function for the energization element while maintaining biocompatibility.
Further, these energization elements may need to be protected from their environment in order to maintain functionality and performance. This may include fluid leaking into or out of the energization element. For example, a biocompatible battery placed in a contact lens may be exposed to tear fluid, which may potentially result in the fluid contacting both cathode and anode, thus shorting the battery. Therefore, a need exists for protecting energization elements from the outside environment.
Accordingly, devices and methods for sealing and encapsulation for biocompatible energization elements are disclosed which afford electrochemical and biocompatible advantages while maintaining the biocompatibility, performance and function necessary for biocompatible energization elements.
One general aspect comprises a biocompatible energization element encapsulated by a polymer film capable of sealing. The polymer film capable of sealing may be treated to form a seal with itself and with elements of the biocompatible energization element. Further, the polymer film capable of sealing may form an encapsulation around the energization element while maintaining a cavity structure within the biocompatible energization element. The biocompatible energization element may comprise: a first and second current collector, a cathode, an anode, an electrolyte, and a laminar structure including a cavity.
Implementations of the biocompatible energization element may comprise one or more of the following features. The polymer film capable of sealing may comprise polypropylene. The polymer film capable of sealing may be treated by a means of welding. The polymer film capable of sealing may be further adhered to the biocompatible energization element with adhesive. The polymer film capable of sealing may be welded to a separator contained within the biocompatible energization element. The polymer film capable of sealing may be welded to a separator shelf contained within the biocompatible energization element. The polymer film capable of sealing may be welded to a current collector of the biocompatible energization element. The biocompatible energization element may be used in a biomedical device. The biomedical device may be an ophthalmic device. The ophthalmic device may be a contact lens.
Another general aspect comprises a method for encapsulating a biocompatible energization element, wherein the method comprises: obtaining a first polymer film capable of sealing; placing a first current collector upon the first polymer capable of sealing; placing a first electrode upon the first current collector; placing a separator shelf upon the first current collector where the separator shelf surrounds the first electrode and where the separator shelf creates a defined cavity within the laminar structure; placing a separator upon the separator shelf where the separator will enclose the first electrode inside the cavity; placing a second electrode upon the separator; placing a second polymer capable of sealing upon the second current collector; and sealing together the first and second polymer capable of sealing to form a sealed and encapsulated energization element. The biocompatible energization element may comprise: a first and second current collector, a cathode, an anode, an electrolyte, and a laminar structure comprising a cavity.
Implementations of the method for encapsulating a biocompatible energization element may comprise one or more of the following features. The first and second polymer layers may comprise polypropylene. The sealing together of the first and second polymer capable of sealing may comprise welding. The sealing together of the first and second polymer capable of sealing may comprise adhering the first and second polymer capable of sealing with adhesive. The first and second polymer capable of sealing may comprise a combination of adhesives and welding of the first and second polymer capable of sealing. The method may further comprise adhering the first and second current collectors to the separator shelf with adhesive. The method may further comprise adhering the polymer film capable of sealing to the biocompatible energization element with adhesive. The method may further comprise metalizing a polymer film capable of sealing to form a metalized polymer film. The method may further comprise sealing the metalized polymer film with the energization element by welding. The method may further comprise sealing the metalized polymer film to a current collector by welding. The method may further comprise placing the biocompatible energization element into an insert. The method may also comprise placing the insert into a biomedical device. The biomedical device may be an ophthalmic device. The ophthalmic device may be a contact lens.
The foregoing and other features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following, more particular description of preferred embodiments of the invention, as illustrated in the accompanying drawings.
Biofuel cells for use in a biocompatible battery are disclosed in this application. In the following sections, detailed descriptions of various examples are described. The descriptions of examples are exemplary embodiments only, and various modifications and alterations may be apparent to those skilled in the art. Therefore, the examples do not limit the scope of this application. The biofuel cells, and the structures that contain them, may be designed for use in biocompatible batteries. In some examples, these biocompatible batteries may be designed for use in, or proximate to, the body of a living organism.
Glossary
In the description and claims below, various terms may be used for which the following definitions will apply:
“Anode” as used herein refers to an electrode through which electric current flows into a polarized electrical device. The direction of electric current is typically opposite to the direction of electron flow. In other words, the electrons flow from the anode into, for example, an electrical circuit.
“Binder” as used herein refers to a polymer that is capable of exhibiting elastic responses to mechanical deformations and that is chemically compatible with other energization element components. For example, binders may include electroactive materials, electrolytes, polymers, and the like.
“Biocompatible” as used herein refers to a material or device that performs with an appropriate host response in a specific application. For example, a biocompatible device does not have toxic or injurious effects on biological systems.
“Cathode” as used herein refers to an electrode through which electric current flows out of a polarized electrical device. The direction of electric current is typically opposite to the direction of electron flow. Therefore, the electrons flow into the cathode of the polarized electrical device, and out of, for example, the connected electrical circuit.
“Coating” as used herein refers to a deposit of material in thin forms. In some uses, the term will refer to a thin deposit that substantially covers the surface of a substrate it is formed upon. In other more specialized uses, the term may be used to describe small thin deposits in smaller regions of the surface.
“Electrode” as used herein may refer to an active mass in the energy source. For example, it may include one or both of the anode and cathode.
“Energized” as used herein refers to the state of being able to supply electrical current or to have electrical energy stored within.
“Energy” as used herein refers to the capacity of a physical system to do work. Many uses of the energization elements may relate to the capacity of being able to perform electrical actions.
“Energy Source” or “Energization Element” or “Energization Device” as used herein refers to any device or layer which is capable of supplying energy or placing a logical or electrical device in an energized state. The energization elements may include batteries. The batteries may be formed from alkaline type cell chemistry and may be solid-state batteries or wet cell batteries.
“Fillers” as used herein refer to one or more energization element separators that do not react with either acid or alkaline electrolytes. Generally, fillers may include substantially water insoluble materials such as carbon black; coal dust; graphite; metal oxides and hydroxides such as those of silicon, aluminum, calcium, magnesium, barium, titanium, iron, zinc, and tin; metal carbonates such as those of calcium and magnesium; minerals such as mica, montmorillonite, kaolinite, attapulgite, and talc; synthetic and natural zeolites such as Portland cement; precipitated metal silicates such as calcium silicate; hollow or solid polymer or glass microspheres, flakes and fibers; and the like.
“Functionalized” as used herein refers to making a layer or device able to perform a function including, for example, energization, activation, and/or control.
“Ionizing Salt” as used herein refers to an ionic solid that will dissolve in a solvent to produce dissolved ions in solution. In numerous examples, the solvent may comprise water.
“Mold” as used herein refers to a rigid or semi-rigid object that may be used to form three-dimensional objects from uncured formulations. Some exemplary molds include two mold parts that, when opposed to one another, define the structure of a three-dimensional object.
“Power” as used herein refers to work done or energy transferred per unit of time.
“Rechargeable” or “Re-energizable” as used herein refer to a capability of being restored to a state with higher capacity to do work. Many uses may relate to the capability of being restored with the ability to flow electrical current at a certain rate for certain, reestablished time periods.
“Reenergize” or “Recharge” as used herein refer to restoring to a state with higher capacity to do work. Many uses may relate to restoring a device to the capability to flow electrical current at a certain rate for a certain reestablished time period.
“Released” as used herein and sometimes referred to as “released from a mold” means that a three-dimensional object is either completely separated from the mold, or is only loosely attached to the mold, so that it may be removed with mild agitation.
“Separator shelf” as used herein means an element of a biocompatible energization element used to avoid edge shorting around the separator by implementing A cut separator, liquid separator or combination of the two. A separator shelf may be a polymer such as polypropylene, machined (e.g. laser) and placed within the cell construct. It needs to be a material that can seal to the top and bottom package films. It may be another material such as glass or ceramic as long as it can be cut and sealed. Adhesive, lacquer, epoxy, asphalt, etc. may be used in combination with a rigid separator shelf.
“Stacked” as used herein means to place at least two component layers in proximity to each other such that at least a portion of one surface of one of the layers contacts a first surface of a second layer. In some examples, a coating, whether for adhesion or other functions, may reside between the two layers that are in contact with each other through said coating.
“Traces” as used herein refer to energization element components capable of connecting together the circuit components. For example, circuit traces may include copper or gold when the substrate is a printed circuit board and may typically be copper, gold or printed film in a flexible circuit. A special type of “Trace” is the current collector. Current collectors are traces with electrochemical compatibility that make the current collectors suitable for use in conducting electrons to and from an anode or cathode in the presence of electrolyte.
The methods and apparatus presented herein relate to forming biocompatible energization elements for inclusion within or on flat or three-dimensional biocompatible devices. A particular class of energization elements may be batteries that are fabricated in layers. The layers may also be classified as laminate layers. A battery formed in this manner may be classified as a laminar battery.
There may be other examples of how to assemble and configure batteries according to the present invention, and some may be described in following sections. However, for many of these examples, there are selected parameters and characteristics of the batteries that may be described in their own right. In the following sections, some characteristics and parameters will be focused upon.
Exemplary Biomedical Device Construction with Biocompatible Energization Elements
An example of a biomedical device that may incorporate the Energization Elements, batteries, of the present invention may be an electroactive focal-adjusting contact lens. Referring to
Referring to
In reference to concepts of the present invention, the battery elements may be formed in a two-dimensional form as depicted in
Segmented Battery Schemes
Referring to
Custom Shapes of Flat Battery Elements
In some examples of biocompatible batteries, the batteries may be formed as flat elements. Referring to
In some examples of flat-formed batteries, the outlines of the battery form may be dimensionally and geometrically configured to fit in custom products. In addition to examples with rectangular or circular outlines, custom “free-form” or “free shape” outlines may be formed which may allow the battery configuration to be optimized to fit within a given product.
In the exemplary biomedical device case of a variable optic, a “free-form” example of a flat outline may be arcuate in form. The free form may be of such geometry that when formed to a three-dimensional shape, it may take the form of a conical, annular skirt that fits within the constraining confines of a contact lens. It may be clear that similar beneficial geometries may be formed where medical devices have restrictive 2D or 3D shape requirements.
Biocompatibility Aspects of Batteries
As an example, the batteries according to the present invention may have important aspects relating to safety and biocompatibility. In some examples, batteries for biomedical devices may need to meet requirements above and beyond those for typical usage scenarios. In some examples, design aspects may be considered related to stressing events. For example, the safety of an electronic contact lens may need to be considered in the event a user breaks the lens during insertion or removal. In another example, design aspects may consider the potential for a user to be struck in the eye by a foreign object. Still further examples of stressful conditions that may be considered in developing design parameters and constraints may relate to the potential for a user to wear the lens in challenging environments like the environment under water or the environment at high altitude in non-limiting examples.
The safety of such a device may be influenced by the materials that the device is formed with or from, by the quantities of those materials employed in manufacturing the device, and also by the packaging applied to separate the devices from the surrounding on- or in-body environment. In an example, pacemakers may be a typical type of biomedical device which may include a battery and which may be implanted in a user for an extended period of time. Accordingly, in some examples, such pacemakers may typically be packaged with welded, hermetic titanium enclosures, or in other examples, multiple layers of encapsulation. Emerging powered biomedical devices may present new challenges for packaging, especially battery packaging. These new devices may be much smaller than existing biomedical devices, for example, an electronic contact lens or pill camera may be significantly smaller than a pacemaker. In such examples, the volume and area available for packaging may be greatly reduced.
Electrical Requirements of Microbatteries
Another area for design considerations may relate to electrical requirements of the device, which may be provided by the battery. In order to function as a power source for a medical device, an appropriate battery may need to meet the full electrical requirements of the system when operating in a non-connected or non-externally powered mode. An emerging field of non-connected or non-externally powered biomedical devices may include, for example, vision-correcting contact lenses, health monitoring devices, pill cameras, and novelty devices. Recent developments in integrated circuit (IC) technology may permit meaningful electrical operation at very low current levels, for example, picoamps of standby current and microamps of operating current. IC's may also permit very small devices.
Microbatteries for biomedical applications may be required to meet many simultaneous, challenging requirements. For example, the microbattery may be required to have the capability to deliver a suitable operating voltage to an incorporated electrical circuit. This operating voltage may be influenced by several factors including the IC process “node,” the output voltage from the circuit to another device, and a particular current consumption target which may also relate to a desired device lifetime.
With respect to the IC process, nodes may typically be differentiated by the minimum feature size of a transistor, such as its “so-called” transistor channel. This physical feature, along with other parameters of the IC fabrication, such as gate oxide thickness, may be associated with a resulting rating standard for “turn-on” or “threshold” voltages of field-effect transistors (FET's) fabricated in the given process node. For example, in a node with a minimum feature size of 0.5 microns, it may be common to find FET's with turn-on voltages of 5.0V. However, at a minimum feature size of 90 nm, the FET's may turn-on at 1.2, 1.8, and 2.5V. The IC foundry may supply standard cells of digital blocks, for example, inverters and flip-flops that have been characterized and are rated for use over certain voltage ranges. Designers chose an IC process node based on several factors including density of digital devices, analog/digital mixed signal devices, leakage current, wiring layers, and availability of specialty devices such as high-voltage FET's. Given these parametric aspects of the electrical components, which may draw power from a microbattery, it may be important for the microbattery power source to be matched to the requirements of the chosen process node and IC design, especially in terms of available voltage and current.
In some examples, an electrical circuit powered by a microbattery, may connect to another device. In non-limiting examples, the microbattery-powered electrical circuit may connect to an actuator or a transducer. Depending on the application, these may include a light-emitting diode (LED), a sensor, a microelectromechanical system (MEMS) pump, or numerous other such devices. In some examples, such connected devices may require higher operating voltage conditions than common IC process nodes. For example, a variable-focus lens may require 35V to activate. The operating voltage provided by the battery may therefore be a critical consideration when designing such a system. In some examples of this type of consideration, the efficiency of a lens driver to produce 35V from a 1V battery may be significantly less than it might be when operating from a 2V battery. Further requirements, such as die size, may be dramatically different considering the operating parameters of the microbattery as well.
Individual battery cells may typically be rated with open-circuit, loaded, and cutoff voltages. The open-circuit voltage is the potential produced by the battery cell with infinite load resistance. The loaded voltage is the potential produced by the cell with an appropriate, and typically also specified, load impedance placed across the cell terminals. The cutoff voltage is typically a voltage at which most of the battery has been discharged. The cutoff voltage may represent a voltage, or degree of discharge, below which the battery should not be discharged to avoid deleterious effects such as excessive gassing. The cutoff voltage may typically be influenced by the circuit to which the battery is connected, not just the battery itself, for example, the minimum operating voltage of the electronic circuit. In one example, an alkaline cell may have an open-circuit voltage of 1.6V, a loaded voltage in the range 1.0 to 1.5V, and a cutoff voltage of 1.0V. The voltage of a given microbattery cell design may depend upon other factors of the cell chemistry employed. And, different cell chemistry may therefore have different cell voltages.
Cells may be connected in series to increase voltage; however, this combination may come with tradeoffs to size, internal resistance, and battery complexity. Cells may also be combined in parallel configurations to decrease resistance and increase capacity; however, such a combination may tradeoff size and shelf life.
Battery capacity may be the ability of a battery to deliver current, or do work, for a period of time. Battery capacity may typically be specified in units such as microamp-hours. A battery that may deliver 1 microamp of current for 1 hour has 1 microamp-hour of capacity. Capacity may typically be increased by increasing the mass (and hence volume) of reactants within a battery device; however, it may be appreciated that biomedical devices may be significantly constrained on available volume. Battery capacity may also be influenced by electrode and electrolyte material.
Depending on the requirements of the circuitry to which the battery is connected, a battery may be required to source current over a range of values. During storage prior to active use, a leakage current on the order of picoamps to nanoamps may flow through circuits, interconnects, and insulators. During active operation, circuitry may consume quiescent current to sample sensors, run timers, and perform such low power consumption functions. Quiescent current consumption may be on the order of nanoamps to milliamps. Circuitry may also have even higher peak current demands, for example, when writing flash memory or communicating over radio frequency (RF). This peak current may extend to tens of milliamps or more. The resistance and impedance of a microbattery device may also be important to design considerations.
Shelf life typically refers to the period of time which a battery may survive in storage and still maintain useful operating parameters. Shelf life may be particularly important for biomedical devices for several reasons. Electronic devices may displace non-powered devices, as for example may be the case for the introduction of an electronic contact lens. Products in these existing market spaces may have established shelf life requirements, for example, three years, due to customer, supply chain, and other requirements. It may typically be desired that such specifications not be altered for new products. Shelf life requirements may also be set by the distribution, inventory, and use methods of a device including a microbattery. Accordingly, microbatteries for biomedical devices may have specific shelf life requirements, which may be, for example, measured in the number of years.
In some examples, three-dimensional biocompatible energization elements may be rechargeable. For example, an inductive coil may also be fabricated on the three-dimensional surface. The inductive coil could then be energized with a radio-frequency (“RF”) fob. The inductive coil may be connected to the three-dimensional biocompatible energization element to recharge the energization element when RF is applied to the inductive coil. In another example, photovoltaics may also be fabricated on the three-dimensional surface and connected to the three-dimensional biocompatible energization element. When exposed to light or photons, the photovoltaics will produce electrons to recharge the energization element.
In some examples, a battery may function to provide the electrical energy for an electrical system. In these examples, the battery may be electrically connected to the circuit of the electrical system. The connections between a circuit and a battery may be classified as interconnects. These interconnects may become increasingly challenging for biomedical microbatteries due to several factors. In some examples, powered biomedical devices may be very small thus allowing little area and volume for the interconnects. The restrictions of size and area may impact the electrical resistance and reliability of the interconnections.
In other respects, a battery may contain a liquid electrolyte which could boil at high temperature. This restriction may directly compete with the desire to use a solder interconnect which may, for example, require relatively high temperatures such as 250 degrees Celsius to melt. Although in some examples, the battery chemistry, including the electrolyte, and the heat source used to form solder based interconnects, may be isolated spatially from each other. In the cases of emerging biomedical devices, the small size may preclude the separation of electrolyte and solder joints by sufficient distance to reduce heat conduction.
Interconnects
Interconnects may allow current to flow to and from the battery in connection with an external circuit. Such interconnects may interface with the environments inside and outside the battery, and may cross the boundary or seal between those environments. These interconnects may be considered as traces, making connections to an external circuit, passing through the battery seal, and then connecting to the current collectors inside the battery. As such, these interconnects may have several requirements. Outside the battery, the interconnects may resemble typical printed circuit traces. They may be soldered to, or otherwise connect to, other traces. In an example where the battery is a separate physical element from a circuit board comprising an integrated circuit, the battery interconnect may allow for connection to the external circuit. This connection may be formed with solder, conductive tape, conductive ink or epoxy, or other means. The interconnect traces may need to survive in the environment outside the battery, for example, not corroding in the presence of oxygen.
As the interconnect passes through the battery seal, it may be of critical importance that the interconnect coexist with the seal and permit sealing. Adhesion may be required between the seal and interconnect in addition to the adhesion which may be required between the seal and battery package. Seal integrity may need to be maintained in the presence of electrolyte and other materials inside the battery. Interconnects, which may typically be metallic, may be known as points of failure in battery packaging. The electrical potential and/or flow of current may increase the tendency for electrolyte to “creep” along the interconnect. Accordingly, an interconnect may need to be engineered to maintain seal integrity.
Inside the battery, the interconnects may interface with the current collectors or may actually form the current collectors. In this regard, the interconnect may need to meet the requirements of the current collectors as described herein, or may need to form an electrical connection to such current collectors.
One class of candidate interconnects and current collectors is metal foils. Such foils are available in thickness of 25 microns or less, which make them suitable for very thin batteries. Such foil may also be sourced with low surface roughness and contamination, two factors which may be critical for battery performance. The foils may include zinc, nickel, brass, copper, titanium, other metals, and various alloys.
Modular Battery Components
In some examples, a modular battery component may be formed according to some aspects and examples of the present invention. In these examples, the modular battery assembly may be a separate component from other parts of the biomedical device. In the example of an ophthalmic contact lens device, such a design may include a modular battery that is separate from the rest of a media insert. There may be numerous advantages of forming a modular battery component. For example, in the example of the contact lens, a modular battery component may be formed in a separate, non-integrated process which may alleviate the need to handle rigid, three-dimensionally formed optical plastic components. In addition, the sources of manufacturing may be more flexible and may operate in a more parallel mode to the manufacturing of the other components in the biomedical device. Furthermore, the fabrication of the modular battery components may be decoupled from the characteristics of three-dimensional (3D) shaped devices. For example, in applications requiring three-dimensional final forms, a modular battery system may be fabricated in a flat or roughly two-dimensional (2D) perspective and then shaped to the appropriate three-dimensional shape. A modular battery component may be tested independently of the rest of the biomedical device and yield loss due to battery components may be sorted before assembly. The resulting modular battery component may be utilized in various media insert constructs that do not have an appropriate rigid region upon which the battery components may be formed; and, in a still further example, the use of modular battery components may facilitate the use of different options for fabrication technologies than might otherwise be utilized, such as, web-based technology (roll to roll), sheet-based technology (sheet-to-sheet), printing, lithography, and “squeegee” processing. In some examples of a modular battery, the discrete containment aspect of such a device may result in additional material being added to the overall biomedical device construct. Such effects may set a constraint for the use of modular battery solutions when the available space parameters require minimized thickness or volume of solutions.
Battery shape requirements may be driven at least in part by the application for which the battery is to be used. Traditional battery form factors may be cylindrical forms or rectangular prisms, made of metal, and may be geared toward products which require large amounts of power for long durations. These applications may be large enough that they may comprise large form factor batteries. In another example, planar (2D) solid-state batteries are thin rectangular prisms, typically formed upon inflexible silicon or glass. These planar solid-state batteries may be formed in some examples using silicon wafer-processing technologies. In another type of battery form factor, low power, flexible batteries may be formed in a pouch construct, using thin foils or plastic to contain the battery chemistry. These batteries may be made flat (2D), and may be designed to function when bowed to a modest out-of-plane (3D) curvature.
In some of the examples of the battery applications in the present invention where the battery may be employed in a variable optic lens, the form factor may require a three-dimensional curvature of the battery component where a radius of that curvature may be on the order of approximately 8.4 mm. The nature of such a curvature may be considered to be relatively steep and for reference may approximate the type of curvature found on a human fingertip. The nature of a relative steep curvature creates challenging aspects for manufacture. In some examples of the present invention, a modular battery component may be designed such that it may be fabricated in a flat, two-dimensional manner and then formed into a three-dimensional form of relative high curvature.
Battery Module Thickness
In designing battery components for biomedical applications, tradeoffs amongst the various parameters may be made balancing technical, safety and functional requirements. The thickness of the battery component may be an important and limiting parameter. For example, in an optical lens application the ability of a device to be comfortably worn by a user may have a critical dependence on the thickness across the biomedical device. Therefore, there may be critical enabling aspects in designing the battery for thinner results. In some examples, battery thickness may be determined by the combined thicknesses of top and bottom sheets, spacer sheets, and adhesive layer thicknesses. Practical manufacturing aspects may drive certain parameters of film thickness to standard values in available sheet stock. In addition, the films may have minimum thickness values to which they may be specified base upon technical considerations relating to chemical compatibility, moisture/gas impermeability, surface finish, and compatibility with coatings that may be deposited upon the film layers.
In some examples, a desired or goal thickness of a finished battery component may be a component thickness that is less than 220 μm. In these examples, this desired thickness may be driven by the three-dimensional geometry of an exemplary ophthalmic lens device where the battery component may need to be fit inside the available volume defined by a hydrogel lens shape given end user comfort, biocompatibility, and acceptance constraints. This volume and its effect on the needs of battery component thickness may be a function of total device thickness specification as well as device specification relating to its width, cone angle, and inner diameter. Another important design consideration for the resulting battery component design may relate to the volume available for active battery chemicals and materials in a given battery component design with respect to the resulting chemical energy that may result from that design. This resulting chemical energy may then be balanced for the electrical requirements of a functional biomedical device for its targeted life and operating conditions
Battery Module Flexibility
Another dimension of relevance to battery design and to the design of related devices that utilize battery based energy sources is the flexibility of the battery component. There may be numerous advantages conferred by flexible battery forms. For example, a flexible battery module may facilitate the previously mentioned ability to fabricate the battery form in a two-dimensional (2D) flat form. The flexibility of the form may allow the two-dimensional battery to then be formed into an appropriate 3D shape to fit into a biomedical device such as a contact lens.
In another example of the benefits that may be conferred by flexibility in the battery module, if the battery and the subsequent device is flexible then there may be advantages relating to the use of the device. In an example, a contact lens form of a biomedical device may have advantages for insertion/removal of the media insert based contact lens that may be closer to the insertion/removal of a standard, non-filled hydrogel contact lens.
The number of flexures may be important to the engineering of the battery. For example, a battery which may only flex one time from a planar form into a shape suitable for a contact lens may have significantly different design from a battery capable of multiple flexures. The flexure of the battery may also extend beyond the ability to mechanically survive the flexure event. For example, an electrode may be physically capable of flexing without breaking, but the mechanical and electrochemical properties of the electrode may be altered by flexure. Flex-induced changes may appear instantly, for example, as changes to impedance, or flexure may introduce changes which are only apparent in long-term shelf life testing.
Battery Module Width
There may be numerous applications into which the biocompatible energization elements or batteries of the present invention may be utilized. In general, the battery width requirement may be largely a function of the application in which it is applied. In an exemplary case, a contact lens battery system may have constrained needs for the specification on the width of a modular battery component. In some examples of an ophthalmic device where the device has a variable optic function powered by a battery component, the variable optic portion of the device may occupy a central spherical region of about 7.0 mm in diameter. The exemplary battery elements may be considered as a three-dimensional object, which fits as an annular, conical skirt around the central optic and formed into a truncated conical ring. If the required maximum diameter of the rigid insert is a diameter of 8.50 mm, and tangency to a certain diameter sphere may be targeted (as for example in a roughly 8.40 mm diameter), then geometry may dictate what the allowable battery width may be. There may be geometric models that may be useful for calculating desirable specifications for the resulting geometry which in some examples may be termed a conical frustum flattened into a sector of an annulus.
Flattened battery width may be driven by two features of the battery element, the active battery components and seal width. In some examples relating to ophthalmic devices a target thickness may be between 0.100 mm and 0.500 mm per side, and the active battery components may be targeted at approximately 0.800 mm wide. Other biomedical devices may have differing design constraints but the principles for flexible flat battery elements may apply in similar fashion.
Cavities as Design Elements in Battery Component Design
In some examples, battery elements may be designed in manners that segment the regions of active battery chemistry. There may be numerous advantages from the division of the active battery components into discrete segments. In a non-limiting example, the fabrication of discrete and smaller elements may facilitate production of the elements. The function of battery elements including numerous smaller elements may be improved. Defects of various kinds may be segmented and non-functional elements may be isolated in some cases to result in decreased loss of function. This may be relevant in examples where the loss of battery electrolyte may occur. The isolation of individualized components may allow for a defect that results in leakage of electrolyte out of the critical regions of the battery to limit the loss of function to that small segment of the total battery element whereas the electrolyte loss through the defect could empty a significantly larger region for batteries configured as a single cell. Smaller cells may result in lowered volume of active battery chemicals on an overall perspective, but the mesh of material surrounding each of the smaller cells may result in a strengthening of the overall structure.
Battery Element Separators
Batteries of the type described in the present invention may utilize a separator material that physically and electrically separates the anode and anode current collector portions from the cathode and cathode current collector portions. The separator may be a membrane that is permeable to water and dissolved electrolyte components; however, it may typically be electrically non-conductive. While a myriad of commercially-available separator materials may be known to those of skill in the art, the novel form factor of the present invention may present unique constraints on the task of separator selection, processing, and handling.
Since the designs of the present invention may have ultra-thin profiles, the choice may be limited to the thinnest separator materials typically available. For example, separators of approximately 25 microns in thickness may be desirable. Some examples which may be advantageous may be about 12 microns in thickness. There may be numerous acceptable commercial separators include microfibrillated, microporous polyethylene monolayer and/or polypropylene-polyethylene-polypropylene (PP/PE/PP) trilayer separator membranes such as those produced by Celgard (Charlotte, N.C.). A desirable example of separator material may be Celgard M824 PP/PE/PP trilayer membrane having a thickness of 12 microns. Alternative examples of separator materials useful for examples of the present invention may include separator membranes including regenerated cellulose (e.g. cellophane).
While PP/PE/PP trilayer separator membranes may have advantageous thickness and mechanical properties, owing to their polyolefinic character, they may also suffer from a number of disadvantages that may need to be overcome in order to make them useful in examples of the present invention. Roll or sheet stock of PP/PE/PP trilayer separator materials may have numerous wrinkles or other form errors that may be deleterious to the micron-level tolerances applicable to the batteries described herein. Furthermore, polyolefin separators may need to be cut to ultra-precise tolerances for inclusion in the present designs, which may therefore implicate laser cutting as an exemplary method of forming discrete current collectors in desirable shapes with tight tolerances. Owing to the polyolefinic character of these separators, certain cutting lasers useful for micro fabrication may employ laser wavelengths, e.g. 355 nm, that will not cut polyolefins. The polyolefins do not appreciably absorb the laser energy and are thereby non-ablatable. Finally, polyolefin separators may not be inherently wettable to aqueous electrolytes used in the batteries described herein.
Nevertheless, there may be methods for overcoming these inherent limitations for polyolefinic type membranes. In order to present a microporous separator membrane to a high-precision cutting laser for cutting pieces into arc segments or other advantageous separator designs, the membrane may need to be flat and wrinkle-free. If these two conditions are not met, the separator membrane may not be fully cut because the cutting beam may be inhibited as a result of defocusing of or otherwise scattering the incident laser energy. Additionally, if the separator membrane is not flat and wrinkle-free, the form accuracy and geometric tolerances of the separator membrane may not be sufficiently achieved. Allowable tolerances for separators of current examples may be, for example, +0 microns and −20 microns with respect to characteristic lengths and/or radii. There may be advantages for tighter tolerances of +0 microns and −10 micron and further for tolerances of +0 microns and −5 microns. Separator stock material may be made flat and wrinkle-free by temporarily laminating the material to a float glass carrier with an appropriate low-volatility liquid. Low-volatility liquids may have advantages over temporary adhesives due to the fragility of the separator membrane and due to the amount of processing time that may be required to release separator membrane from an adhesive layer. Furthermore, in some examples achieving a flat and wrinkle-free separator membrane on float glass using a liquid has been observed to be much more facile than using an adhesive. Prior to lamination, the separator membrane may be made free of particulates. This may be achieved by ultrasonic cleaning of separator membrane to dislodge any surface-adherent particulates. In some examples, handling of a separator membrane may be done in a suitable, low-particle environment such as a laminar flow hood or a cleanroom of at least class 10,000. Furthermore, the float glass substrate may be made to be particulate free by rinsing with an appropriate solvent, ultrasonic cleaning, and/or wiping with clean room wipes.
While a wide variety of low-volatility liquids may be used for the mechanical purpose of laminating microporous polyolefin separator membranes to a float glass carrier, specific requirements may be imposed on the liquid to facilitate subsequent laser cutting of discrete separator shapes. One requirement may be that the liquid has a surface tension low enough to soak into the pores of the separator material which may easily be verified by visual inspection. In some examples, the separator material turns from a white color to a translucent appearance when liquid fills the micropores of the material. It may be desirable to choose a liquid that may be benign and “safe” for workers that will be exposed to the preparation and cutting operations of the separator. It may be desirable to choose a liquid whose vapor pressure may be low enough so that appreciable evaporation does not occur during the time scale of processing (on the order of 1 day). Finally, in some examples the liquid may have sufficient solvating power to dissolve advantageous UV absorbers that may facilitate the laser cutting operation. In an example, it has been observed that a 12 percent (w/w) solution of avobenzone UV absorber in benzyl benzoate solvent may meet the aforementioned requirements and may lend itself to facilitating the laser cutting of polyolefin separators with high precision and tolerance in short order without an excessive number of passes of the cutting laser beam. In some examples, separators may be cut with an 8 W 355 nm nanosecond diode-pumped solid state laser using this approach where the laser may have settings for low power attenuation (e.g. 3 percent power), a moderate speed of 1 to 10 mm/s, and only 1 to 3 passes of the laser beam. While this UV-absorbing oily composition has been proven to be an effective laminating and cutting process aid, other oily formulations may be envisaged by those of skill in the art and used without limitation.
In some examples, a separator may be cut while fixed to a float glass. One advantage of laser cutting separators while fixed to a float glass carrier may be that a very high number density of separators may be cut from one separator stock sheet much like semiconductor die may be densely arrayed on a silicon wafer. Such an approach may provide economy of scale and parallel processing advantages inherent in semiconductor processes. Furthermore, the generation of scrap separator membrane may be minimized. Once separators have been cut, the oily process aid fluid may be removed by a series of extraction steps with miscible solvents, the last extraction may be performed with a high-volatility solvent such as isopropyl alcohol in some examples. Discrete separators, once extracted, may be stored indefinitely in any suitable low-particle environment.
As previously mentioned polyolefin separator membranes may be inherently hydrophobic and may need to be made wettable to aqueous surfactants used in the batteries of the present invention. One approach to make the separator membranes wettable may be oxygen plasma treatment. For example, separators may be treated for 1 to 5 minutes in a 100 percent oxygen plasma at a wide variety of power settings and oxygen flow rates. While this approach may improve wettability for a time, it may be well-known that plasma surface modifications provide a transient effect that may not last long enough for robust wetting of electrolyte solutions. Another approach to improve wettability of separator membranes may be to treat the surface by incorporating a suitable surfactant on the membrane. In some cases, the surfactant may be used in conjunction with a hydrophilic polymeric coating that remains within the pores of the separator membrane.
Another approach to provide more permanence to the hydrophilicity imparted by an oxidative plasma treatment may be by subsequent treatment with a suitable hydrophilic organosilane. In this manner, the oxygen plasma may be used to activate and impart functional groups across the entire surface area of the microporous separator. The organosilane may then covalently bond to and/or non-covalently adhere to the plasma treated surface. In examples using an organosilane, the inherent porosity of the microporous separator may not be appreciably changed, monolayer surface coverage may also be possible and desired. Prior art methods incorporating surfactants in conjunction with polymeric coatings may require stringent controls over the actual amount of coating applied to the membrane, and may then be subject to process variability. In extreme cases, pores of the separator may become blocked, thereby adversely affecting utility of the separator during the operation of the electrochemical cell. An exemplary organosilane useful in the present invention may be (3-aminopropyl) triethoxysilane. Other hydrophilic organosilanes may be known to those of skill in the art and may be used without limitation.
Still another method for making separator membranes wettable by aqueous electrolyte may be the incorporation of a suitable surfactant in the electrolyte formulation. One consideration in the choice of surfactant for making separator membranes wettable may be the effect that the surfactant may have on the activity of one or more electrodes within the electrochemical cell, for example, by increasing the electrical impedance of the cell. In some cases, surfactants may have advantageous anti-corrosion properties, specifically in the case of zinc anodes in aqueous electrolytes. Zinc may be an example known to undergo a slow reaction with water to liberate hydrogen gas, which may be undesirable. Numerous surfactants may be known by those of skill in the art to limit rates of said reaction to advantageous levels. In other cases, the surfactant may so strongly interact with the zinc electrode surface that battery performance may be impeded. Consequently, much care may need to be made in the selection of appropriate surfactant types and loading levels to ensure that separator wettability may be obtained without deleteriously affecting electrochemical performance of the cell. In some cases, a plurality of surfactants may be used, one being present to impart wettability to the separator membrane and the other being present to facilitate anti-corrosion properties to the zinc anode. In one example, no hydrophilic treatment is done to the separator membrane and a surfactant or plurality of surfactants is added to the electrolyte formulation in an amount sufficient to effect wettability of the separator membrane.
Discrete separators may be integrated into the laminar microbattery by direct placement into a means for storage including a designed cavity, pocket, or structure within the assembly. Desirably, this storage means may be formed by a laminar structure having a cutout, which may be a geometric offset of the separator shape, resulting in a cavity, pocket, or structure within the assembly. Furthermore, the storage means may have a ledge or step on which the separator rests during assembly. The ledge or step may optionally include a pressure-sensitive adhesive which retains the discrete separator. Advantageously, the pressure-sensitive adhesive may be the same one used in the construction and stack up of other elements of an exemplary laminar microbattery.
Exemplary Illustrated Processing of Biocompatible Energization—Placed Separator
An example of the steps that may be involved in processing biocompatible energization elements may be found referring to
Proceeding to
Proceeding to
The result of the exemplary processing is depicted in some detail at
Exemplary Processing Illustration of Biocompatible Energization—Deposited Separator
An example of the steps that may be involved in processing biocompatible energization elements is found in
In
Next, at
The processing depicted at
The result of curing may be to form the hydrogel separator precursor material to the wall of the cavity as well as the surface region in proximity to an anode or cathode feature which in the present example may be an anode feature. Adherence of the material to the sidewalls of the cavity may be useful in the separation function of a separator. The result of curing may be to form an anhydrous polymerized precursor mixture concentrate 822 which may be simply considered the separator of the cell. Proceeding to
Proceeding to
Polymerized Battery Element Separators
In some battery designs, the use of a discrete separator (as described in a previous section) may be precluded due to a variety of reasons such as the cost, the availability of materials, the quality of materials, or the complexity of processing for some material options as non-limiting examples. In such cases, a cast or form-in-place separator which is illustrated in the processes of
A method to achieve a uniform, mechanically robust form-in-place separator may be to use UV-curable hydrogel formulations. Numerous water-permeable hydrogel formulations may be known in various industries, for example, the contact lens industry. An example of a common hydrogel in the contact lens industry may be poly(hydroxyethylmethacrylate) crosslinked gel, or simply pHEMA. For numerous applications of the present invention, pHEMA may possess many attractive properties for use in Leclanché and zinc-carbon batteries. pHEMA typically may maintain a water content of approximately 30-40 percent in the hydrated state while maintaining an elastic modulus of about 100 psi or greater. Furthermore, the modulus and water content properties of crosslinked hydrogels may be adjusted by one of ordinary skill in the art by incorporating additional hydrophilic monomeric (e.g. methacrylic acid) or polymeric (e.g. polyvinylpyrrolidone) components. In this manner, the water content, or more specifically, the ionic permeability of the hydrogel may be adjusted by formulation.
Of particular advantage in some examples, a castable and polymerizable hydrogel formulation may comprise one or more diluents to facilitate processing. The diluent may be chosen to be volatile such that the castable mixture may be squeegeed into a cavity, and then allowed a sufficient drying time to remove the volatile solvent component. After drying, a bulk photopolymerization may be initiated by exposure to actinic radiation of appropriate wavelength, such as blue UV light at 420 nm, for the chosen photoinitiator, such as CGI 819. The volatile diluent may help to provide a desirable application viscosity so as to facilitate casting a uniform layer of polymerizable material in the cavity. The volatile diluent may also provide beneficial surface tension lowering effects, particularly in the case where strongly polar monomers are incorporated in the formulation. Another aspect that may be important to achieve the casting of a uniform layer of polymerizable material in the cavity may be the application viscosity. Common small molar mass reactive monomers typically do not have very high viscosities, which may be typically only a few centipoise. In an effort to provide beneficial viscosity control of the castable and polymerizable separator material, a high molar mass polymeric component known to be compatible with the polymerizable material may be selected for incorporation into the formulation. Examples of high molar mass polymers which may be suitable for incorporation into exemplary formulations may include polyvinylpyrrolidone and polyethylene oxide.
In some examples the castable, polymerizable separator may be advantageously applied into a designed cavity, as previously described. In alternative examples, there may be no cavity at the time of polymerization. Instead, the castable, polymerizable separator formulation may be coated onto an electrode-containing substrate, for example, patterned zinc plated brass, and then subsequently exposed to actinic radiation using a photomask to selectively polymerize the separator material in targeted areas. Unreacted separator material may then be removed by exposure to appropriate rinsing solvents. In these examples, the separator material may be designated as a photo-patternable separator.
Multiple Component Separator Formulations
The separator, useful according to examples of the present invention, may have a number of properties that may be important to its function. In some examples, the separator may desirably be formed in such a manner as to create a physical barrier such that layers on either side of the separator do not physically contact one another. The layer may therefore have an important characteristic of uniform thickness, since while a thin layer may be desirable for numerous reasons, a void or gap free layer may be essential. Additionally, the thin layer may desirably have a high permeability to allow for the free flow of ions. Also, the separator requires optimal water uptake to optimize mechanical properties of the separator. Thus, the formulation may include a crosslinking component, a hydrophilic polymer component, and a solvent component.
A crosslinker may be a monomer with two or more polymerizable double bonds. Suitable crosslinkers may be compounds with two or more polymerizable functional groups. Examples of suitable hydrophilic crosslinkers may also include compounds having two or more polymerizable functional groups, as well as hydrophilic functional groups such as polyether, amide or hydroxyl groups. Specific examples may include TEGDMA (tetraethyleneglycol dimethacrylate), TrEGDMA (triethyleneglycol dimethacrylate), ethyleneglycol dimethacylate (EGDMA), ethylenediamine dimethylacrylamide, glycerol dimethacrylate and/or combinations thereof.
The amounts of crosslinker that may be used in some examples may range, e.g., from about 0.000415 to about 0.0156 mole per 100 grams of reactive components in the reaction mixture. The amount of hydrophilic crosslinker used may generally be about 0 to about 2 weight percent and, for example, from about 0.5 to about 2 weight percent. Hydrophilic polymer components capable of increasing the viscosity of the reactive mixture and/or increasing the degree of hydrogen bonding with the slow-reacting hydrophilic monomer, such as high molecular weight hydrophilic polymers, may be desirable.
The high molecular weight hydrophilic polymers provide improved wettability, and in some examples may improve wettability to the separator of the present invention. In some non-limiting examples, high molecular weight hydrophilic polymers may be hydrogen bond receivers which in aqueous environments, hydrogen bond to water, thus becoming effectively more hydrophilic. The absence of water may facilitate the incorporation of the hydrophilic polymer in the reaction mixture. Aside from the specifically named high molecular weight hydrophilic polymers, it may be expected that any high molecular weight polymer will be useful in the present invention provided that when the polymer is added to an exemplary silicone hydrogel formulation, the hydrophilic polymer (a) does not substantially phase separate from the reaction mixture and (b) imparts wettability to the resulting cured polymer.
In some examples, the high molecular weight hydrophilic polymer may be soluble in the diluent at processing temperatures. Manufacturing processes which use water or water soluble diluents, such as isopropyl alcohol (IPA), may be desirable examples due to their simplicity and reduced cost. In these examples, high molecular weight hydrophilic polymers which are water soluble at processing temperatures may also be desirable examples.
Examples of high molecular weight hydrophilic polymers may include but are not limited to polyamides, polylactones, polyimides, polylactams and functionalized polyamides, polylactones, polyimides, polylactams, such as PVP and copolymers thereof, or alternatively, DMA functionalized by copolymerizing DMA with a lesser molar amount of a hydroxyl-functional monomer such as HEMA, and then reacting the hydroxyl groups of the resulting copolymer with materials containing radical polymerizable groups. High molecular weight hydrophilic polymers may include but are not limited to poly-N-vinyl pyrrolidone, poly-N-vinyl-2-piperidone, poly-N-vinyl-2-caprolactam, poly-N-vinyl-3-methyl-2-caprolactam, poly-N-vinyl-3-methyl-2-piperidone, poly-N-vinyl-4-methyl-2-piperidone, poly-N-vinyl-4-methyl-2-caprolactam, poly-N-vinyl-3-ethyl-2-pyrrolidone, and poly-N-vinyl-4,5-dimethyl-2-pyrrolidone, polyvinylimidazole, poly-N—N-dimethylacrylamide, polyvinyl alcohol, polyacrylic acid, polyethylene oxide, poly 2 ethyl oxazoline, heparin polysaccharides, polysaccharides, mixtures and copolymers (including block or random, branched, multichain, comb-shaped or star-shaped) thereof where poly-N-vinylpyrrolidone (PVP) may be a desirable example where PVP has been added to a hydrogel composition to form an interpenetrating network which shows a low degree of surface friction and a low dehydration rate.
Additional components or additives, which may generally be known in the art, may also be included. Additives may include but are not limited to ultra-violet absorbing compounds, photo-initiators such as CGI 819, reactive tints, antimicrobial compounds, pigments, photochromic, release agents, combinations thereof and the like.
The method associated with these types of separators may also include receiving CGI 819; then mixing with PVP, HEMA, EGDMA and IPA; and then curing the resulting mixture with a heat source or an exposure to photons. In some examples the exposure to photons may occur where the photons' energy is consistent with a wavelength occurring in the ultraviolet portion of the electromagnetic spectrum. Other methods of initiating polymerization generally performed in polymerization reactions are within the scope of the present invention.
Current Collectors and Electrodes
In some examples of zinc carbon and Leclanche cells, the cathode current collector may be a sintered carbon rod. This type of material may face technical hurdles for thin electrochemical cells of the present invention. In some examples, printed carbon inks may be used in thin electrochemical cells to replace a sintered carbon rod for the cathode current collector, and in these examples, the resulting device may be formed without significant impairment to the resulting electrochemical cell. Typically, the carbon inks may be applied directly to packaging materials which may comprise polymer films, or in some cases metal foils. In the examples where the packaging film may be a metal foil, the carbon ink may need to protect the underlying metal foil from chemical degradation and/or corrosion by the electrolyte. Furthermore, in these examples, the carbon ink current collector may need to provide electrical conductivity from the inside of the electrochemical cell to the outside of the electrochemical cell, implying sealing around or through the carbon ink. Due to the porous nature of carbon inks, this may be not easily accomplished without significant challenges. Carbon inks also may be applied in layers that have finite and relatively small thickness, for example, 10 to 20 microns. In a thin electrochemical cell design in which the total internal package thickness may only be about 100 to 150 microns, the thickness of a carbon ink layer may take up a significant fraction of the total internal volume of the electrochemical cell, thereby negatively impacting electrical performance of the cell. Further, the thin nature of the overall battery and the current collector in particular may imply a small cross-sectional area for the current collector. As resistance of a trace increases with trace length, and decreases with cross-sectional area, there may be a direct tradeoff between current collector thickness and resistance. The bulk resistivity of carbon ink may be insufficient to meet the resistance requirement of thin batteries. Inks filled with silver or other conductive metals may also be considered to decrease resistance and/or thickness, but they may introduce new challenges such as incompatibility with novel electrolytes. In consideration of these factors, in some examples it may be desirable to realize efficient and high performance thin electrochemical cells of the present invention by utilizing a thin metal foil as the current collector, or to apply a thin metal film to an underlying polymer packaging layer to act as the current collector. Such metal foils may have significantly lower resistivity, thereby allowing them to meet electrical resistance requirements with much less thickness than printed carbon inks.
In some examples, one or more of the top and/or bottom packaging layers may serve as a substrate for a sputtered current collector metal or metal stack. For example, 3M® Scotchpak 1109 backing may be metallized using physical vapor deposition (PVD) of one or more metallic layers useful as a current collector for a cathode. Exemplary metal stacks useful as cathode current collectors may be Ti—W (titanium-tungsten) adhesion layers and Ti (titanium) conductor layers. Exemplary metal stacks useful as anode current collectors may be Ti—W adhesion layers, Au (gold) conductor layers, and In (indium) deposition layers. The thickness of the PVD layers may be less than 500 nm in total. If multiple layers of metals are used, the electrochemical and barrier properties may need to be compatible with the battery. For example, copper may be electroplated on top of a seed layer to grow a thick layer of conductor. Additional layers may be plated upon the copper. However, copper may be electrochemically incompatible with certain electrolytes especially in the presence of zinc. Accordingly, if copper is used as a layer in the battery, it may need to be sufficiently isolated from the battery electrolyte. Alternatively, copper may be excluded or another metal substituted.
In some other examples, top and/or bottom packaging foils may also function as current collectors. For example, a 25 micron brass foil may be useful as an anode current collector for a zinc anode. The brass foil may be optionally electroplated with indium prior to electroplating with zinc. In one example, cathode current collector packaging foils may comprise titanium foil, Hastelloy C-276 foil, chromium foil, and/or tantalum foil. In certain designs, one or more packaging foils may be fine blanked, embossed, etched, textured, laser machined, or otherwise processed to provide desirable form, surface roughness, and/or geometry to the final cell packaging.
Anode and Anode Corrosion Inhibitors
The anode for the laminar battery of the present invention may, for example, comprise zinc. In traditional zinc carbon batteries, a zinc anode may take the physical form of a can in which the contents of the electrochemical cell may be contained. For the battery of the present invention, a zinc can may be an example but there may be other physical forms of zinc that may provide desirable to realize ultra-small battery designs.
Electroplated zinc may have examples of use in a number of industries, for example, for the protective or aesthetic coating of metal parts. In some examples, electroplated zinc may be used to form thin and conformal anodes useful for batteries of the present invention.
Furthermore, the electroplated zinc may be patterned in seemingly endless configurations, depending on the design intent. A facile means for patterning electroplated zinc may be processing with the use of a photomask or a physical mask. A plating mask may be fabricated by a variety of approaches. One approach may be by using a photomask. In these examples, a photoresist may be applied to a conductive substrate, the substrate on which zinc may subsequently be plated. The desired plating pattern may be then projected to the photoresist by means of a photomask, thereby causing curing of selected areas of photoresist. The uncured photoresist may then be removed with appropriate solvent and cleaning techniques. The result may be a patterned area of conductive material that may receive an electroplated zinc treatment. While this method may provide benefit to the shape or design of the zinc to be plated, the approach may require use of available photopatternable materials, which may have constrained properties to the overall cell package construction. Consequently, new and novel methods for patterning zinc may be required to realize some designs of thin microbatteries of the present invention.
An alternative means of patterning zinc anodes may be by means of a physical mask application. A physical mask may be made by cutting desirable apertures in a film having desirable barrier and/or packaging properties. Additionally, the film may have pressure sensitive adhesive applied to one or both sides. Finally, the film may have protective release liners applied to one or both adhesives. The release liner may serve the dual purpose of protecting the adhesive during aperture cutting and protecting the adhesive during specific processing steps of assembling the electrochemical cell, specifically the cathode filling step, described in following description. In some examples, a zinc mask may comprise a PET film of approximately 100 microns thickness to which a pressure sensitive adhesive may be applied to both sides in a layer thickness of approximately 10-20 microns. Both PSA layers may be covered by a PET release film which may have a low surface energy surface treatment, and may have an approximate thickness of 50 microns. In these examples, the multi-layer zinc mask may comprise PSA and PET film. PET films and PET/PSA zinc mask constructs as described herein may be desirably processed with precision nanosecond laser micromachining equipment, such as, an Oxford Lasers E-Series laser micromachining workstation, to create ultra-precise apertures in the mask to facilitate later plating. In essence, once the zinc mask has been fabricated, one side of the release liner may be removed, and the mask with apertures may be laminated to the anode current collector and/or anode-side packaging film/foil. In this manner, the PSA creates a seal at the inside edges of the apertures, facilitating clean and precise masking of the zinc during electroplating.
The zinc mask may be placed and then electroplating of one or more metallic materials may be performed. In some examples, zinc may be electroplated directly onto an electrochemically compatible anode current collector foil such as brass. In alternate design examples where the anode side packaging comprises a polymer film or multi-layer polymer film upon which seed metallization has been applied, zinc, and/or the plating solutions used for depositing zinc, may not be chemically compatible with the underlying seed metallization. Manifestations of lack of compatibility may include film cracking, corrosion, and/or exacerbated H2 evolution upon contact with cell electrolyte. In such a case, additional metals may be applied to the seed metal to affect better overall chemical compatibility in the system. One metal that may find particular utility in electrochemical cell constructions may be indium. Indium may be widely used as an alloying agent in battery grade zinc with its primary function being to provide an anti-corrosion property to the zinc in the presence of electrolyte. In some examples, indium may be successfully deposited on various seed metallizations such as Ti—W and Au. Resulting films of 1-3 microns of indium on the seed metallization layers may be low-stress and adherent. In this manner, the anode-side packaging film and attached current collector having an indium top layer may be conformable and durable. In some examples, it may be possible to deposit zinc on an indium-treated surface, the resulting deposit may be very non-uniform and nodular. This effect may occur at lower current density settings, for example, 20 ASF. As viewed under a microscope, nodules of zinc may be observed to form on the underlying smooth indium deposit. In certain electrochemical cell designs, the vertical space allowance for the zinc anode layer may be up to about 5-10 microns maximum, but in some examples, lower current densities may be used for zinc plating, and the resulting nodular growths may grow taller than the maximum anode vertical allowance. It may be that the nodular zinc growth stems from a combination of the high overpotential of indium and the presence of an oxide layer of indium.
In some examples, higher current density DC plating may overcome the relatively large nodular growth patterns of zinc on indium surfaces. For example, 100 ASF plating conditions may result in nodular zinc, but the size of the zinc nodules may be drastically reduced compared to 20 ASF plating conditions. Furthermore, the number of nodules may be vastly greater under 100 ASF plating conditions. The resulting zinc film may ultimately coalesce to a more or less uniform layer with only some residual feature of nodular growth while meeting the vertical space allowance of about 5-10 microns.
An added benefit of indium in the electrochemical cell may be reduction of H2 formation, which may be a slow process that occurs in aqueous electrochemical cells containing zinc. The indium may be beneficially applied to one or more of the anode current collector, the anode itself as a co-plated alloying component, or as a surface coating on the electroplated zinc. For the latter case, indium surface coatings may be desirably applied in-situ by way of an electrolyte additive such as indium trichloride, indium sulfate or indium acetate. When such additives may be added to the electrolyte in small concentrations, indium may spontaneously plate on exposed zinc surfaces as well as portions of exposed anode current collector.
Zinc and similar anodes commonly used in commercial primary batteries is typically found in sheet, rod, and paste forms. The anode of a miniature, biocompatible battery may be of similar form, e.g. thin foil, or may be plated as previously mentioned. The properties of this anode may differ significantly from those in existing batteries, for example, because of differences in contaminants or surface finish attributed to machining and plating processes. Accordingly, the electrodes and electrolyte may require special engineering to meet capacity, impedance, and shelf life requirements. For example, special plating process parameters, plating bath composition, surface treatment, and electrolyte composition may be needed to optimize electrode performance.
Cathode Mixture
There are numerous cathode chemistry mixtures that may be consistent with the concepts of the present invention. In some examples, a cathode mixture, which may be a term for a chemical formulation used to form a battery's cathode, may be applied as a paste, gel, suspension, or slurry, and may comprise a transition metal oxide such as manganese dioxide, some form of conductive additive which, for example, may be a form of conductive powder such as carbon black or graphite, and a water-soluble polymer such as polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) or some other binder additive. In some examples, other components may be included such as one or more of binders, electrolyte salts, corrosion inhibitors, water or other solvents, surfactants, rheology modifiers, and other conductive additives, such as, conductive polymers. Once formulated and appropriately mixed, the cathode mixture may have a desirable rheology that allows it to either be dispensed onto desired portions of the separator and/or cathode current collector, or squeegeed through a screen or stencil in a similar manner. In some examples, the cathode mixture may be dried before being used in later cell assembly steps, while in other examples, the cathode may contain some or all of the electrolyte components, and may only be partially dried to a selected moisture content.
The transition metal oxide may, for example, be manganese dioxide. The manganese dioxide which may be used in the cathode mixture may be, for example, electrolytic manganese dioxide (EMD) due to the beneficial additional specific energy that this type of manganese dioxide provides relative to other forms, such as natural manganese dioxide (NMD) or chemical manganese dioxide (CMD). Furthermore, the EMD useful in batteries of the present invention may need to have a particle size and particle size distribution that may be conducive to the formation of depositable or printable cathode mixture pastes/slurries. Specifically, the EMD may be processed to remove significant large particulate components that may be considered large relative to other features such as battery internal dimensions, separator thicknesses, dispense tip diameters, stencil opening sizes, or screen mesh sizes. Particle size optimization may also be used to improve performance of the battery, for example, internal impedance and discharge capacity.
Milling is the reduction of solid materials from one average particle size to a smaller average particle size, by crushing, grinding, cutting, vibrating, or other processes. Milling may also be used to free useful materials from matrix materials in which they may be embedded, and to concentrate minerals. A mill is a device that breaks solid materials into smaller pieces by grinding, crushing, or cutting. There may be several means for milling and many types of materials processed in them. Such means of milling may include: ball mill, bead mill, mortar and pestle, roller press, and jet mill among other milling alternatives. One example of milling that may be utilized in the present invention is jet milling. After the milling, the state of the solid is changed, for example, the particle size, the particle size disposition and the particle shape. Aggregate milling processes may also be used to remove or separate contamination or moisture from aggregate to produce “dry fills” prior to transport or structural filling. Some equipment may combine various techniques to sort a solid material into a mixture of particles whose size is bounded by both a minimum and maximum particle size. Such processing may be referred to as “classifiers” or “classification.”
Milling may be one aspect of cathode mixture production for uniform particle size distribution of the cathode mixture ingredients. Uniform particle size in a cathode mixture may assist in viscosity, rheology, electroconductivity, and other properties of a cathode. Milling may assist these properties by controlling agglomeration, or a mass collection, of the cathode mixture ingredients. Agglomeration—the clustering of disparate elements, which in the case of the cathode mixture, may be carbon allotropes and transition metal oxides—may negatively affect the filling process by leaving voids in the desired cathode cavity as illustrated in
Also, filtration may be another important step for the removal of agglomerated or unwanted particles. Unwanted particles may include over-sized particles, contaminates, or other particles not explicitly accounted for in the preparation process. Filtration may be accomplished by means such as filter-paper filtration, vacuum filtration, chromatography, microfiltration, and other means of filtration.
In some examples, EMD may have an average particle size of 7 microns with a large particle content that may contain particulates up to about 70 microns. In alternative examples, the EMD may be sieved, further milled, or otherwise separated or processed to limit large particulate content to below a certain threshold, for example, 25 microns or smaller.
The cathode may also comprise silver dioxide or nickel oxyhydroxide. Such materials may offer increased capacity and less decrease in loaded voltage during discharge relative to manganese dioxide, both desirable properties in a battery. Batteries based on these cathodes may have current examples present in industry and literature. A novel microbattery utilizing a silver dioxide cathode may include a biocompatible electrolyte, for example, one comprising zinc chloride and/or ammonium chloride instead of potassium hydroxide.
Some examples of the cathode mixture may include a polymeric binder. The binder may serve a number of functions in the cathode mixture. The primary function of the binder may be to create a sufficient inter-particle electrical network between EMD particles and carbon particles. A secondary function of the binder may be to facilitate mechanical adhesion and electrical contact to the cathode current collector. A third function of the binder may be to influence the rheological properties of the cathode mixture for advantageous dispensing and/or stenciling/screening. Still, a fourth function of the binder may be to enhance the electrolyte uptake and distribution within the cathode.
The choice of the binder polymer as well as the amount to be used may be beneficial to the function of the cathode in the electrochemical cell of the present invention. If the binder polymer is too soluble in the electrolyte to be used, then the primary function of the binder—electrical continuity—may be drastically impacted to the point of cell non-functionality. On the contrary, if the binder polymer is insoluble in the electrolyte to be used, portions of EMD may be ionically insulated from the electrolyte, resulting in diminished cell performance such as reduced capacity, lower open circuit voltage, and/or increased internal resistance.
The binder may be hydrophobic; it may also be hydrophilic. Examples of binder polymers useful for the present invention comprise PVP, polyisobutylene (PIB), rubbery triblock copolymers comprising styrene end blocks such as those manufactured by Kraton Polymers, styrene-butadiene latex block copolymers, polyacrylic acid, hydroxyethylcellulose, carboxymethylcellulose, fluorocarbon solids such as polytetrafluoroethylene, among others.
A solvent may be one component of the cathode mixture. A solvent may be useful in wetting the cathode mixture, which may assist in the particle distribution of the mixture. One example of a solvent may be toluene. Also, a surfactant may be useful in wetting, and thus distribution, of the cathode mixture. One example of a surfactant may be a detergent, such as Triton™ QS-44. Triton™ QS-44 may assist in the dissociation of aggregated ingredients in the cathode mixture, allowing for a more uniform distribution of the cathode mixture ingredients.
A conductive carbon may typically be used in the production of a cathode. Carbon is capable of forming many allotropes, or different structural modifications. Different carbon allotropes have different physical properties allowing for variation in electroconductivity. For example, the “springiness” of carbon black may help with adherence of a cathode mixture to a current collector. However, in energization elements requiring relatively low amounts of energy, these variations in electroconductivity may be less important than other favorable properties such as density, particle size, heat conductivity, and relative uniformity, among other properties. Examples of carbon allotropes include: diamond, graphite, graphene, amorphous carbon (informally called carbon black), buckminsterfullerenes, glassy carbon (also called vitreous carbon), carbon aerogels, and other possible forms of carbon capable of conducting electricity. One example of a carbon allotrope may be graphite.
One example of a completed cathode mixture formulation may be given in Table 1 below:
where PIB is polyisobutylene, JMEMD is jet milled manganese dioxide, KS6 is a graphite produced by Timcal, and PIB B10 is polyisobutylene with a molecular weight grade of B10.
Once the cathode mixture has been formulated and processed, the mixture may be dispensed, applied, and/or stored onto a surface such as the hydrogel separator, or the cathode current collector, or into a volume such as the cavity in the laminar structure. Filing onto a surface may result in a volume being filled over time. In order to apply, dispense, and/or store the mixture, a certain rheology may be desired to optimize the dispensing, applying, and/or storing process. For example, a less viscous rheology may allow for better filling of the cavity while at the same time possibly sacrificing particle distribution. A more viscous rheology may allow for optimized particle distribution, while possibly decreasing the ability to fill the cavity and possibly losing electroconductivity.
For example,
Further, in
In one example, the cathode mixture may resemble a peanut-butter like consistency optimized for squeegee filling the laminar construct cavity while maintaining electroconductivity. In another example, the mixture may be viscous enough to be printed into the cavity. While in yet another example, the cathode mixture may be dried, placed, and stored in the cavity.
Electrolyte
An electrolyte is a component of a battery which facilitates a chemical reaction to take place between the chemical materials of the electrodes. Typical electrolytes may be electrochemically active to the electrodes, for example, allowing oxidation and reduction reactions to occur. As used herein, an electrolyte may be a solution comprising a suitable solvent and ionic species. The solution may be suitable in that the solution may support the presence of these ionic species. An ionizing solute may be a material that when added to the solvent dissolves into solvated ionic species. In some examples, the ionizing solute may be an ionizing salt. The electrolyte solutions that contain ionic species may have an ability to support electrical conductivity by the diffusion of the ionic species in the solution.
In some examples, this important electrochemical activity may make for a challenge to creating devices that are biocompatible. For example, potassium hydroxide (KOH) is a commonly used electrolyte in alkaline cells. At high concentration the material has a high pH and may interact unfavorably with various living tissues. On the other hand, in some examples, electrolytes may be employed which may be less electrochemically active; however, these materials may typically result in reduced electrical performance, such as reduced cell voltage and increased cell resistance. Accordingly, one key aspect of the design and engineering of a biomedical microbattery may be the electrolyte. It may be desirable for the electrolyte to be sufficiently active to meet electrical requirements while also being relatively safe for use in- or on-body.
Various test scenarios may be used to determine the safety profile of battery components, such as electrolytes, to living cells. These results, in conjunction with tests of the battery packaging, may allow engineering design of a battery system that may meet requirements. For example, when developing a powered contact lens, battery electrolytes may be tested on a human corneal cell model. These tests may include experiments on electrolyte concentration, exposure time, and additives. The results of such tests may indicate cell metabolism and other physiological aspects.
Electrolytes for use in the present invention may include zinc chloride, zinc acetate, zinc sulfate, zinc bromide, zinc gluconate hydrate, zinc nitrate, and zinc iodide, ammonium acetate, and ammonium chloride in mass concentrations from approximately 0.1 percent to 50 percent, and in a non-limiting example may be approximately 25 percent. The specific concentrations may depend on solubility, electrochemical activity, battery performance, shelf life, seal integrity, and biocompatibility amongst other dependencies. In some examples, several classes of additives may be utilized in the composition of a battery system. Additives may be mixed into the base electrolyte formulation to alter its characteristics. For example, gelling agents such as agar may reduce the ability of the electrolyte to leak out of packing, thereby increasing safety. Other examples may include carboxymethyl cellulose or cellulose gum. Other examples may include hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose. Corrosion inhibitors such as indium acetate may be added to the electrolyte, for example, to improve shelf life by reducing the undesired dissolution of electrode material such as the zinc anode into the electrolyte. These inhibitors may positively or adversely affect the safety profile of the battery. Wetting agents or surfactants may be added, for example, to allow the electrolyte to wet the separator or to be filled into the battery package. Again, these wetting agents may be positive or negative for safety. The addition of surfactant to the electrolyte may increase the electrical impedance of the cell. Accordingly, the lowest concentration of surfactant to achieve the desired wetting or other properties may be desired. Exemplary surfactants may include Triton™ X-100, Triton™ QS44, and Dowfax™ 3B2 in concentrations from 0.01 percent to 2 percent. One exemplary electrolyte formulation may comprise approximately 10 to 20 percent ZnCl2, approximately 250 to 500 ppm Triton™ QS44, approximately 100 to 200 ppm indium +3 ion supplied as indium acetate, and the balance comprising water.
Novel electrolytes are also emerging which may dramatically improve the safety profile of biomedical microbatteries. For example, a class of solid electrolytes may be inherently resistant to leaking while still offering suitable electrical performance. A gelled or hydro-gelled electrolyte may also provide adequate electrical performance while maintaining resilience to leaking and thus preserving biocompatibility. A gelled electrolyte may also replace the need of a battery separator where the gelled electrolyte's permeability properties may also function to prevent an electrical short between the electrodes. For example, flexible asymmetric supercapacitors using ultrathin two-dimensional MnO2 nano-sheets and graphene in aqueous Ca(NO3)2—SiO2 gel electrolyte have realized excellent electrochemical performance (such as energy density up to 97.2 Wh kg−1, much higher than traditional MnO2 based supercapacitors and no more than 3% capacitance loss even after 10,000 cycles) while maintaining biocompatibility.
These types of gelled electrolytes may be formulated by, for example, creating an aqueous solution of 2 molar calcium nitrate (Ca(NO3)2) in deionized water, adding 1 percent weight by weight carboxymethylcellulose (CMC), adding 10 percent weight by weight silicon dioxide (SiO2), mixing to homogeny, then letting sit until gelled.
Proceeding to
Reserve Cells
Reserve cells are batteries in which the active materials, the electrodes and electrolyte, are separated until the time of use. Because of this separation, the cells' self-discharge is greatly reduced and shelf life is greatly increased. As an example batteries using “salt water” electrolyte are commonly used in reserve cells for marine use. Torpedoes, buoys, and emergency lights may use such batteries. Salt water batteries may be designed from a variety of electrode materials, including zinc, magnesium, aluminum, copper, tin, manganese dioxide, and silver oxide. The electrolyte may be actual sea water, for example, water from the ocean flooding the battery upon contact, or may be a specially engineered saline formulation.
In other examples, a reserve cell may be formulated from any of the electrolyte formulations as have been discussed herein, wherein the electrolyte is segregated from the battery cell by a storage means. In some examples, a physical action such as applying force upon the storage means may rupture the storage device in a planned manner such that the electrolyte flows into the battery cell and activates the potential for the chemicals of the electrodes to be turned into electrical energy. In some other examples, a seal of the storage means may be electrically activated. For example, the application of an electric potential on a thin metal seal may melt the seal allowing electrolyte to escape the storage means. In still further examples, an electrically activated pore may be utilized to allow the electrolyte to be released from its storage means. For these examples, there typically may be a source of electricity to activate the flow of electrolyte into the primary battery. An inductive energy source or a photoactive energy (i.e. photocell) source may allow for a controlled signal to provide electrical energy to release electrolyte.
A second reserve cell may also be ideal for this purpose of activating flow of electrolyte into a primary battery on receipt of a signal. The second reserve cell may be a smaller cell that allows for fluid from its surroundings to diffuse into the cell. After the second reserve cell battery device is formed without electrolyte the shelf life may be extended. After the battery device is formed into a biomedical device such as a contact lens it may then be stored in a saline solution. This saline solution may diffuse into the battery thus activating the second reserve cell. A subsequent activation signal, such as the presence of light after a package containing the contact lens is opened may activate the main (reserve) sell to allow electrolyte to flow into the battery device and activate the battery.
A saline electrolyte may have superior biocompatibility as compared to classical electrolytes such as potassium hydroxide and zinc chloride. Contact lenses are stored in a “packing solution” which is typically a mixture of sodium chloride, perhaps with other salts and buffering agents such as sodium borate, boric acid, citric acid, citrates, bicarbonates, TRIS (2-amino-2-hydroxymethyl-1,3-propanediol), Bis-Tris(Bis-(2-hydroxyethyl)-imino-tris-(hydroxymethyl)-methane), bis-aminopolyols, triethanolamine, ACES (N-(2-hydroxyethyl)-2-aminoethanesulfonic acid), BES (N,N-Bis(2-hydroxyethyl)-2-aminoethanesulfonic acid), HEPES (4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid), MES (2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid), MOPS (3[N-morpholino]-propanesulfonic acid), PIPES (piperazine-N,N′-bis(2-ethanesulfonic acid), TES (N-[Tris(hydroxymethyl)methyl]-2-aminoethanesulfonic acid), salts thereof, phosphate buffers, e.g. Na2HPO4, NaH2PO4, and KH2PO4 or mixtures thereof. A formulation of packing solution has been demonstrated as a battery electrolyte in combination with a zinc anode and manganese dioxide cathode. Other electrolyte and electrode combinations are possible.
A contact lens using a “salt water” battery may comprise an electrolyte based on sodium chloride, packing solution, or even a specially engineered electrolyte similar to tear fluid. In some examples, exposure to human tears could enable operation of the battery device.
In addition to, or instead of, possible benefits for biocompatibility by using an electrolyte more similar to tears, or actually using tears, a reserve cell may be used to meet the shelf life requirements of a contact lens product. Typical contact lenses are specified for storage of 3 years or more. This may be a challenging requirement for a battery with a small and thin package. A reserve cell for use in a contact lens may have a design similar to those shown in
Some battery systems may use or consume electrolyte during the chemical reaction. Accordingly, it may be necessary to engineer a certain volume of electrolyte into the packaged system. This electrolyte may be stored in various locations including the separator or a reservoir.
In some examples, a design of a battery system may include a component or components that may function to limit discharge capacity of the battery system. For example, it may be desirable to design the materials and amounts of materials of the anode, cathode, or electrolyte such that one of them may be depleted first during the course of reactions in the battery system. In such an example, the depletion of one of the anode, cathode, or electrolyte may reduce the potential for problematic discharge and side reactions to not take place at lower discharge voltages. These problematic reactions may produce, for example, excessive gas or byproducts which could be detrimental to safety and other factors.
Battery Architecture and Fabrication
Battery architecture and fabrication technology may be closely intertwined. As has been discussed in earlier sections of the present invention, a battery has the following elements: cathode, anode, separator, electrolyte, cathode current collector, anode current collector, and packaging. Clever design may try to combine these elements in easy to fabricate subassemblies. In other examples, optimized design may have dual-use components, such as, using a metal package to double as a current collector. From a relative volume and thickness standpoint, these elements may be nearly all the same volume, except for the cathode. In some examples, the electrochemical system may require about two (2) to ten (10) times the volume of cathode as anode due to significant differences in mechanical density, energy density, discharge efficiency, material purity, and the presence of binders, fillers, and conductive agents. In these examples, the relative scale of the various components may be approximated in the following thicknesses of the elements: Anode current collector=1 μm; Cathode current collector=1 μm; Electrolyte=interstitial liquid (effectively 0 μm); Separator=as thin or thick as desired where the planned maximal thickness may be approximately 15 μm; Anode=5 μm; and the Cathode=50 μm. For these examples of elements the packaging needed to provide sufficient protection to maintain battery chemistry in use environments may have a planned maximal thickness of approximately 50 μm.
In some examples, which may be fundamentally different from large, prismatic constructs such as cylindrical or rectangular forms, and which may be different than wafer-based solid state construct, a construct may assume a pouch-like arrangement, using webs or sheets fabricated into various configurations with battery elements arranged inside. The containment may have two films, or one film folded over onto the other side, either configuration of which may form two roughly planar surfaces which may then be sealed on the perimeter to form a container. This thin-but-wide form factor may make battery elements themselves thin and wide. Furthermore, these examples may be suitable for application through coating, gravure printing, screen printing, sputtering, or other similar fabrication technology.
There may be numerous arrangements of the internal components, such as the anode, separator and cathode, in these pouch-like battery examples with thin-but-wide form factors. Within the enclosed region formed by the two films, these basic elements may be either co-planar, that is side-by-side on the same plane, or co-facial, which may be face-to-face on opposite planes. In the co-planar arrangement, the anode, separator, and cathode may be deposited on the same surface. For the co-facial arrangement, the anode may be deposited on surface-1, the cathode may be deposited on surface-2, and the separator may be placed between the two, either deposited on one of the sides, or inserted as its own separate element.
Another type of example may be classified as laminate assembly, which may involve using films, either in a web or sheet form, to build up a battery layer by layer. Sheets may be bonded to each other using adhesives, such as pressure-sensitive adhesives, thermally activated adhesives, or chemical reaction-based adhesives. In some examples, the sheets may be bonded by welding techniques such as thermal welding, ultrasonic welding and the like. Sheets may lend themselves to standard industry practices as roll-to-roll (R2R), or sheet-to-sheet assembly. As indicted earlier, an interior volume for cathode may need to be substantially larger than the other active elements in the battery. Much of a battery construct may have to create the space of this cathode material, and support it from migration during flexing of the battery. Another portion of the battery construct that may consume significant portions of the thickness budget may be the separator material. In some examples, a sheet form of separator may create an advantageous solution for laminate processing. In other examples, the separator may be formed by dispensing hydrogel material into a layer to act as the separator.
In these laminate battery assembly examples, the forming product may have an anode sheet, which may be a combination of a package layer and an anode current collector, as well as substrate for the anode layer. The forming product may also have an optional separator spacer sheet, a cathode spacer sheet, and a cathode sheet. The cathode sheet may be a combination of a package layer and a cathode current collector layer.
Intimate contact between electrodes and current collectors is of critical importance for reducing impedance and increasing discharge capacity. If portions of the electrode are not in contact with the current collector, resistance may increase since conductivity is then through the electrode (typically less conductive than the current collector) or a portion of the electrode may become totally disconnected. In coin cell and cylindrical batteries, intimacy is realized with mechanical force to crimp the can, pack paste into a can, or through similar means. Wave washers or similar springs are used in commercial cells to maintain force within the battery; however, these may add to the overall thickness of a miniature battery. In typical patch batteries, a separator may be saturated in electrolyte, placed across the electrodes, and pressed down by the external packaging.
In a laminar cofacial battery, several methods to increase electrode intimacy exist. The anode may be plated directly onto the current collector rather than using a paste. This process inherently results in a high level of intimacy and conductivity. The cathode, however, is typically a paste. Although binder material present in the cathode paste may provide adhesion and cohesion, mechanical pressure may be needed to ensure the cathode paste remains in contact with the cathode current collector. This may be especially important as the package is flexed and the battery ages and discharges, for example, as moisture leaves the package through thin and small seals. Compression of the cathode may be achieved in the laminar, cofacial battery by introducing a compliant separator and/or electrolyte between the anode and cathode. A gel electrolyte or hydrogel separator, for example, may compress on assembly and not simply run out of the battery as a liquid electrolyte might. Once the battery is sealed, the electrolyte and/or separator may then push back against the cathode. An embossing step may be performed after assembly of the laminar stack, introducing compression into the stack.
Battery Element Sealing and Encapsulation
In some examples of battery elements for use in biomedical devices, the chemical action of the battery involves aqueous chemistry, where water or moisture is an important constituent to control. Therefore it may be important to incorporate sealing mechanisms that retard or prevent the movement of moisture either out of or into the battery body. Moisture barriers may be designed to keep the internal moisture level at a designed level, within some tolerance. In some examples, a moisture barrier may be divided into two sections or components; namely, the package and the seal.
The package may refer to the main material of the enclosure. In some examples, the package may comprise a bulk material. The Water Vapor Transmission Rate (WVTR) may be an indicator of performance, with ISO, ASTM standards controlling the test procedure, including the environmental conditions operant during the testing. Ideally, the WVTR for a good battery package may be “zero.” Exemplary materials with a near-zero WVTR may be glass and metal foils. Plastics, on the other hand, may be inherently porous to moisture, and may vary significantly for different types of plastic. Engineered materials, laminates, or co-extrudes may be hybrids of the common package materials.
The seal may be the interface between two of the package surfaces. The connecting of seal surfaces finishes the enclosure along with the package. In many examples, the nature of seal designs may make them difficult to characterize for the seal's WVTR due to difficulty in performing measurements using an ISO or ASTM standard, as the sample size or surface area may not be compatible with those procedures. In some examples, a practical manner to testing seal integrity may be a functional test of the actual seal design, for some defined conditions. Seal performance may be a function of the seal material, the seal thickness, the seal length, the seal width, the sealing process, and the seal adhesion or intimacy to package substrates.
In some examples, the plurality of components comprising the laminar microbatteries of the present invention may be held together with a pressure-sensitive adhesive (PSA) that also serves as a sealant. While a myriad of commercially available pressure-sensitive adhesive formulations may exist, such formulations almost always include components that may make them unsuitable for use within a biocompatible laminar microbattery. Examples of undesirable components in pressure-sensitive adhesives may include low molecular mass leachable components, antioxidants e.g. BHT and/or MEHQ, plasticizing oils, impurities, oxidatively unstable moieties containing, for example, unsaturated chemical bonds, residual solvents and/or monomers, polymerization initiator fragments, polar tackifiers, and the like.
Suitable PSAs may on the other hand exhibit the following properties. They may be able to be applied to laminar components to achieve thin layers on the order of 2 to 20 microns. As well, they may comprise a minimum of, for example, zero undesirable or non-biocompatible components. Additionally, they may have sufficient adhesive and cohesive properties so as to bind the components of the laminar battery together. And, they may be able to flow into the micron-scale features inherent in devices of the present construction while providing for a robust sealing of electrolyte within the battery. In some examples of suitable PSAs, the PSAs may have a low permeability to water vapor in order to maintain a desirable aqueous electrolyte composition within the battery even when the battery may be subjected to extremes in humidity for extended periods of time. The PSAs may have good chemical resistance to components of electrolytes such as acids, surfactants, and salts. They may be inert to the effects of water immersion. Suitable PSAs may have a low permeability to oxygen to minimize the rate of direct oxidation, which may be a form of self-discharge, of zinc anodes. And, they may facilitate a finite permeability to hydrogen gas, which may be slowly evolved from zinc anodes in aqueous electrolytes. This property of finite permeability to hydrogen gas may avoid a build-up of internal pressure.
Polyisobutylene (PIB) is a commercially-available material that may be formulated into PSA compositions meeting many if not all desirable requirements. Furthermore, PIB may be an excellent barrier sealant with very low water absorbance and low oxygen permeability. An example of PIB useful in the examples of the present invention may be Oppanol® B15 by BASF Corporation. Oppanol® B15 may be dissolved in hydrocarbon solvents such as toluene, heptane, dodecane, mineral spirits, and the like. One exemplary PSA composition may include 30 percent Oppanol® B15 (w/w) in a solvent mixture, including 70 percent (w/w) toluene and 30 percent dodecane. The adhesive and rheological properties of PIB-based PSA's may be determined in some examples by the blending of different molecular mass grades of PIB. A common approach may be to use a majority of low molar mass PIB, e.g. Oppanol® B10 to effect wetting, tack, and adhesion, and to use a minority of high molar mass PIB to effect toughness and resistance to flow. Consequently, blends of any number of PIB molar mass grades may be envisioned and may be practiced within the scope of the present invention. Furthermore, tackifiers may be added to the PSA formulation so long as the aforementioned requirements may be met. By their very nature, tackifiers impart polar properties to PSA formulations, so they may need to be used with caution so as to not adversely affect the barrier properties of the PSA. Furthermore, tackifiers may in some cases be oxidatively unstable and may include an antioxidant, which could leach out of the PSA. For these reasons, exemplary tackifiers for use in PSA's for biocompatible laminar microbatteries may include fully or mostly hydrogenated hydrocarbon resin tackifiers such as the Regalrez series of tackifiers from Eastman Chemical Corporation.
Next,
In some examples, the energization elements according to the present invention may be designed to have a specified operating life. The operating life may be estimated by determining a practical amount of moisture permeability that may be obtained using a particular battery system and then estimating when such a moisture leakage may result in an end of life condition for the battery. For example, if a battery is stored in a wet environment, then the partial pressure difference between inside and outside the battery may be minimal, resulting in a reduced moisture loss rate, and therefore the battery life may be extended. The same exemplary battery stored in a particularly dry and hot environment may have a significantly reduced expectable lifetime due to the strong driving function for moisture loss.
Methods of Sealing and Encapsulation for Biocompatible Energization Elements
At
Next, at
One alternative to the placement of electrodes as depicted in
One alternative to the exemplary method steps illustrated in
Biocompatible energization elements typically require an electrolyte. The electrolyte may be pre-wet onto the cathode and separator prior to assembly. The electrolyte may be dispensed onto the cathode and/or separator after they have been placed into the package. Electrolyte may be added just prior to placement of the top package, or alternatively, may be dispensed into the cell through a needle after partial sealing of the cell.
Sealing of the laminar structure may be accomplished by different combination of sealing and adhering means. For example, assuming the laminar structure is rectangular in shape, wherein the rectangle consists of two long edges and two short edges, the long edges may be laser welded while the short edges may be adhered by PSAs, or vice versa. Alternatively, the edges of the laminar structure may be uniformly sealed entirely by welding, or entirely by PSAs. The type of seal may depend on the characteristics of the seal, and the need for complete sealing compared to the need for some level of permeability. The sealing may occur as a result of: sealing the top polymer film capable of sealing to the bottom polymer film capable of sealing; sealing the polymer film directly to the separator shelf; sealing a metalized version of the polymer film to the current collector; or any other similar methods of sealing the laminar structure.
Additional Package and Substrate Considerations in Biocompatible Battery Modules
There may be numerous packaging and substrate considerations that may dictate desirable characteristics for package designs used in biocompatible laminar microbatteries. For example, the packaging may desirably be predominantly foil and/or film based where these packaging layers may be as thin as possible, for example, 10 to 50 microns. Additionally, the packaging may provide a sufficient diffusion barrier to moisture gain or loss during the shelf life. In many desirable examples, the packaging may provide a sufficient diffusion barrier to oxygen ingress to limit degradation of zinc anodes by direct oxidation.
In some examples, the packaging may provide a finite permeation pathway to hydrogen gas that may evolve due to direct reduction of water by zinc. And, the packaging may desirably sufficiently contain and may isolate the contents of the battery such that potential exposure to a user may be minimized.
In the present invention, packaging constructs may include the following types of functional components: top and bottom packaging layers, PSA layers, spacer layers, interconnect zones, filling ports, and secondary packaging.
In some examples, top and bottom packaging layers may comprise metallic foils or polymer films. Top and bottom packaging layers may comprise multi-layer film constructs containing a plurality of polymer and/or barrier layers. Such film constructs may be referred to as coextruded barrier laminate films. An example of a commercial coextruded barrier laminate film of particular utility in the present invention may be 3M® Scotchpak 1109 backing which consists of a polyethylene terephthalate (PET) carrier web, a vapor-deposited aluminum barrier layer, and a polyethylene layer including a total average film thickness of 33 microns. Numerous other similar multilayer barrier films may be available and may be used in alternate examples of the present invention.
In design constructions including a PSA, packaging layer surface roughness may be of particular importance because the PSA may also need to seal opposing packaging layer faces. Surface roughness may result from manufacturing processes used in foil and film production, for example, processes employing rolling, extruding, embossing and/or calendaring, among others. If the surface is too rough, PSA may be not able to be applied in a uniform thickness when the desired PSA thickness may be on the order of the surface roughness Ra (the arithmetic average of the roughness profile). Furthermore, PSA's may not adequately seal against an opposing face if the opposing face has roughness that may be on the order of the PSA layer thickness. In the present invention, packaging materials having a surface roughness (Ra) less than 10 microns may be acceptable examples. In some examples, surface roughness values may be 5 microns or less. And, in still further examples, the surface roughness may be 1 micron or less. Surface roughness values may be measured by a variety of methods including but not limited to measurement techniques such as white light interferometry, stylus profilometry, and the like. There may be many examples in the art of surface metrology that surface roughness may be described by a number of alternative parameters and that the average surface roughness, Ra, values discussed herein may be meant to be representative of the types of features inherent in the aforementioned manufacturing processes.
Specific examples have been described to illustrate sample embodiments for the methods of sealing and encapsulation for biocompatible batteries. These examples are for said illustration and are not intended to limit the scope of the claims in any manner. Accordingly, the description is intended to embrace all examples that may be apparent to those skilled in the art.
This patent application is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/827,613 filed Aug. 17, 2015 which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/040,178 filed Aug. 21, 2014. The contents of each are hereby incorporated by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 754804 | Pratt | Mar 1904 | A |
| 787657 | Quimby | Apr 1905 | A |
| 1390765 | Cox | Sep 1921 | A |
| 1559562 | Edison | Nov 1925 | A |
| 2871281 | Moulton et al. | Jan 1959 | A |
| 2991324 | Vogt | Jul 1961 | A |
| 3291296 | Lemkelde | Dec 1966 | A |
| 3306776 | Tamminen | Feb 1967 | A |
| 3353998 | Langguth et al. | Nov 1967 | A |
| 3375136 | Biggar | Mar 1968 | A |
| 3431327 | George | Mar 1969 | A |
| 3642539 | Kawakami | Feb 1972 | A |
| 4118860 | Buckler | Oct 1978 | A |
| 4125686 | Kinsman | Nov 1978 | A |
| 4254191 | Kniazzeh | Mar 1981 | A |
| 4268132 | Neefe | May 1981 | A |
| 4294891 | Flitsch et al. | Oct 1981 | A |
| 4408023 | Gould et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
| 4522897 | Walsh | Jun 1985 | A |
| 4592944 | Clark et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
| 4601545 | Kern | Jul 1986 | A |
| 4772517 | Muenstedt et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
| 4783237 | Aine et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4787903 | Grendahl | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4816031 | Pfoff | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4846031 | Voytilla et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
| 4921728 | Takiguchi et al. | May 1990 | A |
| 4939000 | Dodds et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
| 4977046 | Bleszinski, Jr. | Dec 1990 | A |
| 5112703 | Koenig | May 1992 | A |
| 5168018 | Yoshizawa et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5219497 | Blum | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5227805 | King et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5358539 | Dawson | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5430693 | Ganter et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5435874 | Takeuchi et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5478420 | Gauci et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5492782 | Higley | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5540741 | Gozdz et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5549988 | Reichert et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5568353 | Bai et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5596567 | Demuro et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5600180 | Kusaka et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5607485 | Gozdz et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5682210 | Weirich | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5712721 | Large | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5792574 | Mitate et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5928808 | Eshraghi | Jul 1999 | A |
| 6004691 | Eshraghi | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6134188 | Ganter et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6168884 | Neudecker et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6217171 | Auten et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6242132 | Neudecker et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6269266 | Chiao et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6273904 | Chen | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6277520 | Moutsios | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6282668 | Neudecker | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6316142 | Delnick | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6322589 | Cumming | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6355501 | Fung et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6364482 | Roffman et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6379835 | Kucherovsky | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6434429 | Kraus et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6447669 | Lain | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6470215 | Kraus et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6477410 | Henley et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6490487 | Kraus et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6517974 | Kobayashi et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6544171 | Beetz et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6553262 | Lang et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6574509 | Kraus et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6599778 | Pogge et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6622043 | Kraus et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6638304 | Azar | Oct 2003 | B2 |
| 6770176 | Benson et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6852254 | Spaulding et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6893395 | Kraus et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
| 6924036 | Polastri et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 7324287 | Gollier | Jan 2008 | B1 |
| 7404636 | Blum et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7407728 | Wenneis et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7410700 | Wang | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7423801 | Kaufman et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7548040 | Lee et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7581124 | Jacobson et al. | Aug 2009 | B1 |
| 7755583 | Meredith | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7794511 | Johnson et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7794643 | Watanabe et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7798301 | Keating et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7876573 | Motohara et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7901811 | Hambitzer et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7959769 | Zhang et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7968991 | Wong et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7985500 | Root | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 7991934 | Yao et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 7993773 | Snyder et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8014164 | Yang | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8014166 | Yazdani | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8061130 | Shibasaki | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8309397 | Shim, II et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8343216 | Brady et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8433409 | Martin et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8579435 | Blum et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8857983 | Pugh et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8950862 | Pugh et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
| 9102111 | Pugh et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
| 9110310 | Pugh et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
| 9134546 | Pugh et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
| 9195075 | Pugh et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
| 9233513 | Pugh et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
| 9296158 | Pugh et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
| 9601780 | Kato | Mar 2017 | B2 |
| 9746695 | Flitsch et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
| 20020009649 | Sato et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020041027 | Sugizaki | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020041999 | Moutsios et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020058151 | Uchikoba et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020110728 | Gozdz et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020162631 | Wien et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20030002160 | Johnson et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030021601 | Goldstein | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030059526 | Benson et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030064292 | Neudecker et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030068559 | Armstrong et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030069666 | Nagler | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030137922 | Ro et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030146414 | Ndzebet | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030165744 | Schubert | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030207978 | Yadav | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20040000732 | Spaulding et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040027536 | Blum et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040062985 | Aamodt | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040084790 | Blum et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040091779 | Kang | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040131925 | Jenson et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040239784 | Ibe | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040239874 | Swab et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040241528 | Sarpeshkar et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040242794 | Kanazawa | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040258982 | Coffey | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050009959 | Bair et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050031959 | Kato et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050036109 | Blum et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050069760 | Somatomo | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050099594 | Blum et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050147877 | Tarnowski et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050185135 | Blum et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050208381 | Boulton | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050231377 | Sunderman et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050231677 | Meredith | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050255079 | Santerre et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050271796 | Neudecker et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060001137 | Hundt et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060024567 | Heller et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060026201 | Cabillic | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060026505 | Mani et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060038536 | Lafollette et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060065989 | Druffel et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060066808 | Blum et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060095128 | Blum et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060099496 | Aamodt | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060127761 | Phillips et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060152912 | Karrer et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060166088 | Hokanson et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060181676 | Tucker et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060202359 | Chen | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060204839 | Richards et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060210877 | Manko et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060226556 | Kurita et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060234121 | Kim I et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060255441 | Ohta | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060265058 | Silvestrini | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060267167 | McCain | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060267768 | Sabeta | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20070052876 | Kaufman et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070090869 | Adewole et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070125644 | Heller | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070128420 | Maghribi | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070141463 | Stevanovic | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070156184 | Root | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070159562 | Haddock et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070231575 | Watanabe et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070242171 | Mori | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070242173 | Blum et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070285385 | Albert et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080002149 | Fritsch et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080020127 | Whiteford et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080020874 | Huang et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080024848 | Kawano et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080024858 | Kaufman et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080042227 | Asano et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080048180 | Abe et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080058652 | Payne | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080079396 | Yamazaki et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080086206 | Nasiatka et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080101267 | Kurokawa | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080187824 | Tomantschger | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080208335 | Blum et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080212007 | Meredith | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080241683 | Fensore et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080261390 | Chen et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080280184 | Yao et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20090002012 | Doong et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090003383 | Watanabe et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090033863 | Blum et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090042065 | Simon et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090042066 | Simon et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090046349 | Haddock et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090050267 | Conlon et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090057289 | Williams | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090079641 | Cruzado et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090091818 | Haddock et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090092903 | Johnson | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090098281 | Zhang | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090105817 | Bretthauer et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090142656 | Nathan et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090175016 | Legen et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090182426 | Von et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090202899 | Pyszczek | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090204207 | Blum et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090204454 | Lagudi | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090206498 | Tepedino, Jr. et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090243125 | Pugh et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090244477 | Pugh et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090256977 | Haddock et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090269392 | Tauber et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090278503 | Hundt et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090288405 | Shibasaki | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20100001926 | Amirparviz et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100002190 | Clarke et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100062342 | Li | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100072643 | Pugh | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100073534 | Yano et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100076553 | Pugh | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100078837 | Pugh | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100078838 | Pugh et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100079724 | Pugh et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100103368 | Amirparviz et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100103369 | Pugh et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100109175 | Pugh et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100110372 | Pugh et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100149777 | Yamamoto et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100178543 | Gruner et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100211186 | Senders et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100261071 | Lopatin et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100266895 | Tucholski | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100295135 | Masuoka et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100310932 | Leysieffer | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110007656 | He et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110039150 | Wang et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110045112 | Pugh et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110065706 | Wensley et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110074281 | Farquhar et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110076567 | Bouillon | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110076568 | Bouillon | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110086077 | McCrea et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110091778 | Kambara | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110134683 | Yamazaki et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110143225 | Sakai et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110174431 | Darmes et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110230963 | Cuevas | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110284912 | Sekine et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110287318 | Loveness et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110311877 | Matsuda et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120024295 | Mihin | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120026598 | Pugh et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120038881 | Amirparviz | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120057244 | Pugh et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120088129 | Kaneda | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120092612 | Binder | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120100412 | Kwon et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120107666 | Bailey | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120115041 | West | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120156259 | Rau et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120162600 | Pugh | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120171599 | Nakagawa et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120188467 | Escuti et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120196187 | Fujinami et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120218508 | Pugh et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120234453 | Pugh et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120235277 | Pugh et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120236254 | Pugh et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120236524 | Pugh | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120242953 | Pugh et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120245444 | Otis et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120259188 | Besling et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120282519 | Freitag et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20130019540 | Magnus | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130023005 | Chen et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130024575 | Taylor et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130034760 | Otts | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130065122 | Chiang et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130089769 | Proctor et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130155371 | Zhang | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130194540 | Pugh et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130196214 | Scott | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130215380 | Pugh et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130245754 | Blum et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130245755 | Fehr et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130266855 | Kim et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130266873 | Ishii et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130309547 | Bazzarella | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20140000101 | Pugh | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140002788 | Otts | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140017557 | Lockett et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140036226 | Blum et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140047742 | Schloss | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140121557 | Gannon | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140147742 | Anastas | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140148899 | Fehr et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140227574 | Savinell et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140272522 | Pugh et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140306361 | Pugh et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140323968 | Rogers et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140342247 | Kishida et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20150212339 | Pugh et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150214567 | Etzkorn | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150281411 | Markus | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150287960 | Andry | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150288023 | Andry et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150288024 | Andry et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150309337 | Flitsch et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150323811 | Zhang et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
| 20150378176 | Flitsch et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20160028101 | Flitsch et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20160054589 | Flitsch et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
| 20160054590 | Otts et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
| 20160056440 | Flitsch et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
| 20160056459 | Flitsch et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
| 20160056498 | Birch et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
| 20170229730 | Flitsch et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 073391 | Nov 2010 | AR |
| 073742 | Dec 2010 | AR |
| 2009293178 | Mar 2010 | AU |
| 2009293182 | Mar 2010 | AU |
| 2014201529 | Oct 2014 | AU |
| PI0919346 | Dec 2015 | BR |
| 2389907 | Dec 2003 | CA |
| 2737861 | Mar 2010 | CA |
| 2737865 | Mar 2010 | CA |
| 1344022 | Apr 2002 | CN |
| 1520983 | Aug 2004 | CN |
| 1808744 | Jul 2006 | CN |
| 101041258 | Sep 2007 | CN |
| 101062581 | Oct 2007 | CN |
| 101094626 | Dec 2007 | CN |
| 100403477 | Jul 2008 | CN |
| 101395520 | Mar 2009 | CN |
| 101669059 | Mar 2010 | CN |
| 101983122 | Mar 2011 | CN |
| 102005612 | Apr 2011 | CN |
| 102159381 | Aug 2011 | CN |
| 102159382 | Aug 2011 | CN |
| 102171028 | Aug 2011 | CN |
| 102196789 | Sep 2011 | CN |
| 102202874 | Sep 2011 | CN |
| 102271899 | Dec 2011 | CN |
| 102727218 | Oct 2012 | CN |
| 102959769 | Mar 2013 | CN |
| 203300756 | Nov 2013 | CN |
| 203733888 | Jul 2014 | CN |
| 102196789 | Nov 2014 | CN |
| 19858172 | Jun 2000 | DE |
| 102007048859 | Apr 2009 | DE |
| 581964 | Feb 1994 | EP |
| 918248 | May 1999 | EP |
| 1183745 | Mar 2002 | EP |
| 1262307 | Dec 2002 | EP |
| 1313159 | May 2003 | EP |
| 1342560 | Sep 2003 | EP |
| 1262307 | Nov 2003 | EP |
| 1342560 | Sep 2004 | EP |
| 1736291 | Dec 2006 | EP |
| 1747879 | Jan 2007 | EP |
| 1736291 | Mar 2007 | EP |
| 1747879 | Mar 2007 | EP |
| 1760515 | Mar 2007 | EP |
| 1849574 | Oct 2007 | EP |
| 1849589 | Oct 2007 | EP |
| 1892788 | Feb 2008 | EP |
| 1342560 | Jul 2008 | EP |
| 1849589 | Mar 2009 | EP |
| 1262307 | Feb 2010 | EP |
| 1760515 | Aug 2011 | EP |
| 2349697 | Aug 2011 | EP |
| 2349698 | Aug 2011 | EP |
| 2485294 | Aug 2012 | EP |
| 2508935 | Oct 2012 | EP |
| 2564454 | Mar 2013 | EP |
| 2605314 | Jun 2013 | EP |
| 2620802 | Jul 2013 | EP |
| 2631962 | Aug 2013 | EP |
| 2779272 | Sep 2014 | EP |
| 2812750 | Dec 2014 | EP |
| 2996187 | Mar 2016 | EP |
| 2740170 | Apr 2016 | EP |
| 3016194 | May 2016 | EP |
| 743731 | Jan 1956 | GB |
| 1307393 | Feb 1973 | GB |
| 211275-D | Apr 2011 | IL |
| 211309-D | Apr 2011 | IL |
| 222620D | Dec 2012 | IL |
| S52146650 | Dec 1977 | JP |
| S57136774 | Aug 1982 | JP |
| S58116764 | Jul 1983 | JP |
| S63105319 | Jul 1988 | JP |
| H01286809 | Nov 1989 | JP |
| H0765817 | Mar 1995 | JP |
| H08162823 | Jun 1996 | JP |
| H08508826 | Sep 1996 | JP |
| H08264203 | Oct 1996 | JP |
| H09266636 | Oct 1997 | JP |
| H10209185 | Aug 1998 | JP |
| H10219185 | Aug 1998 | JP |
| H10229095 | Aug 1998 | JP |
| H11135712 | May 1999 | JP |
| 2000228213 | Aug 2000 | JP |
| 2000299542 | Oct 2000 | JP |
| 2001028036 | Jan 2001 | JP |
| 2001110445 | Apr 2001 | JP |
| 2002093385 | Mar 2002 | JP |
| 2002118198 | Apr 2002 | JP |
| 2002537580 | Nov 2002 | JP |
| 2003202525 | Jul 2003 | JP |
| 2004505667 | Feb 2004 | JP |
| 2004305313 | Nov 2004 | JP |
| 2005142050 | Jun 2005 | JP |
| 2005523483 | Aug 2005 | JP |
| 2005535942 | Nov 2005 | JP |
| 2006507541 | Mar 2006 | JP |
| 2006093659 | Apr 2006 | JP |
| 2006317321 | Nov 2006 | JP |
| 2007533098 | Nov 2007 | JP |
| 2007313594 | Dec 2007 | JP |
| 2008502016 | Jan 2008 | JP |
| 2008506031 | Feb 2008 | JP |
| 2008053134 | Mar 2008 | JP |
| 2008072111 | Mar 2008 | JP |
| 2008088019 | Apr 2008 | JP |
| 2008512348 | Apr 2008 | JP |
| 2008178226 | Jul 2008 | JP |
| 2008529208 | Jul 2008 | JP |
| 2008227068 | Sep 2008 | JP |
| 2008281095 | Nov 2008 | JP |
| 2009007629 | Jan 2009 | JP |
| 2009087895 | Apr 2009 | JP |
| 2010034254 | Feb 2010 | JP |
| 2010073533 | Apr 2010 | JP |
| 2010517081 | May 2010 | JP |
| 2010209855 | Sep 2010 | JP |
| 2010536158 | Nov 2010 | JP |
| 2011082586 | Apr 2011 | JP |
| 2011512565 | Apr 2011 | JP |
| 2011515157 | May 2011 | JP |
| 2011516922 | May 2011 | JP |
| 2011516927 | May 2011 | JP |
| 2011517659 | Jun 2011 | JP |
| 2012009820 | Jan 2012 | JP |
| 2012502823 | Feb 2012 | JP |
| 2012503222 | Feb 2012 | JP |
| 2012504065 | Feb 2012 | JP |
| 2012504257 | Feb 2012 | JP |
| 2012044074 | Mar 2012 | JP |
| 2012056758 | Mar 2012 | JP |
| 2012507747 | Mar 2012 | JP |
| 2013516255 | May 2013 | JP |
| 2013532010 | Aug 2013 | JP |
| 2013533046 | Aug 2013 | JP |
| 2013176558 | Sep 2013 | JP |
| 2013239263 | Nov 2013 | JP |
| 5591567 | Sep 2014 | JP |
| 5788668 | Oct 2015 | JP |
| 100625892 | Sep 2006 | KR |
| 20070009231 | Jan 2007 | KR |
| 20100102969 | Sep 2010 | KR |
| 20100132003 | Dec 2010 | KR |
| 20110069113 | Jun 2011 | KR |
| 20110073530 | Jun 2011 | KR |
| 20130096676 | Aug 2013 | KR |
| 2116891 | Aug 1998 | RU |
| 2307429 | Sep 2007 | RU |
| 2310952 | Nov 2007 | RU |
| 2320378 | Mar 2008 | RU |
| 2380794 | Jan 2010 | RU |
| 2563842 | Sep 2015 | RU |
| 10201400548X | Oct 2014 | SG |
| 10201506558 | Mar 2016 | SG |
| 200532278 | Oct 2005 | TW |
| 200629549 | Aug 2006 | TW |
| 200916832 | Apr 2009 | TW |
| 200950960 | Dec 2009 | TW |
| 201003172 | Jan 2010 | TW |
| 201024827 | Jul 2010 | TW |
| 201026489 | Jul 2010 | TW |
| 201029830 | Aug 2010 | TW |
| 201140756 | Nov 2011 | TW |
| I384672 | Feb 2013 | TW |
| WO-9423334 | Oct 1994 | WO |
| WO1997017737 | May 1997 | WO |
| WO-0004601 | Jan 2000 | WO |
| WO2000057504 | Sep 2000 | WO |
| WO2002029836 | Apr 2002 | WO |
| WO-03035166 | May 2003 | WO |
| WO2003069700 | Aug 2003 | WO |
| WO-03078300 | Sep 2003 | WO |
| WO-03090611 | Nov 2003 | WO |
| WO-2004015460 | Feb 2004 | WO |
| WO-2004015460 | Jun 2004 | WO |
| WO2003069700 | Aug 2004 | WO |
| WO-2004093786 | Nov 2004 | WO |
| WO2005064712 | Jul 2005 | WO |
| WO-2005088388 | Sep 2005 | WO |
| WO-2005098994 | Oct 2005 | WO |
| WO-2006050171 | May 2006 | WO |
| WO-2006077192 | Jul 2006 | WO |
| WO2006078103 | Jul 2006 | WO |
| WO-2006078472 | Jul 2006 | WO |
| WO-2006050171 | Sep 2006 | WO |
| WO-2005098994 | Nov 2006 | WO |
| WO-2006115649 | Nov 2006 | WO |
| WO-2007050402 | May 2007 | WO |
| WO-2006115649 | Jun 2007 | WO |
| WO-2007072781 | Jun 2007 | WO |
| WO-2007081959 | Jul 2007 | WO |
| WO2007102692 | Sep 2007 | WO |
| WO-2008010390 | Jan 2008 | WO |
| WO2008039806 | Apr 2008 | WO |
| WO-2007081959 | May 2008 | WO |
| WO2008039806 | Jul 2008 | WO |
| WO-2008091859 | Jul 2008 | WO |
| WO-2008103906 | Aug 2008 | WO |
| WO-2008109867 | Sep 2008 | WO |
| WO-2008109867 | Oct 2008 | WO |
| WO-2008103906 | Nov 2008 | WO |
| WO2009012463 | Jan 2009 | WO |
| WO2009018315 | Feb 2009 | WO |
| WO-2009025763 | Feb 2009 | WO |
| WO-2007050402 | Mar 2009 | WO |
| WO-2009038897 | Mar 2009 | WO |
| WO-2009038897 | Jun 2009 | WO |
| WO-2009105261 | Aug 2009 | WO |
| WO-2009109867 | Sep 2009 | WO |
| WO-2009113296 | Sep 2009 | WO |
| WO-2009117506 | Sep 2009 | WO |
| WO-2009117506 | Jan 2010 | WO |
| WO-2010033679 | Mar 2010 | WO |
| WO-2010033683 | Mar 2010 | WO |
| WO-2010039610 | Apr 2010 | WO |
| WO-2010051203 | May 2010 | WO |
| WO-2010051225 | May 2010 | WO |
| WO-2010058574 | May 2010 | WO |
| WO-2010033679 | Jun 2010 | WO |
| WO-2010051225 | Jun 2010 | WO |
| WO-2010062504 | Jun 2010 | WO |
| WO-2010039610 | Jul 2010 | WO |
| WO-2010082993 | Jul 2010 | WO |
| WO-2010082993 | Sep 2010 | WO |
| WO-2010119754 | Oct 2010 | WO |
| WO-2010133317 | Nov 2010 | WO |
| WO-2011005216 | Jan 2011 | WO |
| WO-2011007548 | Jan 2011 | WO |
| WO2011015866 | Feb 2011 | WO |
| WO-2011083105 | Jul 2011 | WO |
| WO-2010133317 | Oct 2011 | WO |
| WO2011137239 | Nov 2011 | WO |
| WO-2011153158 | Dec 2011 | WO |
| WO-2011163080 | Dec 2011 | WO |
| WO-2012013774 | Feb 2012 | WO |
| WO-2012018583 | Feb 2012 | WO |
| WO-2012023774 | Feb 2012 | WO |
| WO2012046854 | Apr 2012 | WO |
| WO-2012129210 | Sep 2012 | WO |
| WO-2013019525 | Feb 2013 | WO |
| WO03065481 | Aug 2013 | WO |
| WO-2013112748 | Aug 2013 | WO |
| WO2013128206 | Sep 2013 | WO |
| WO2014010526 | Jan 2014 | WO |
| WO-2014049089 | Apr 2014 | WO |
| WO2014071571 | May 2014 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| A. M. Gaikwad, B. V. Khau, G. Davies, B. Hertzberg, D. A. Steingart, and A. C. Arias, “A High Areal Capacity Flexible Lithium-Ion Battery with a Strain-Compliant Design,” Advanced Enemy Materials, vol. 5, iss, 3, 2015. |
| A, M. Gaikwad, A. C. Arias, and D. A. Steingart, “Recent Progress on Printed Flexible Batteries: Mechanical Challenges Printing Technologies, and Future Prospects,” Energy Technology, 2015. |
| A. E. Ostfeld, I. Deckman, A. M. Gaikwad, C. M. Lochner, and A. C. Arias, “Screen printed passive components for flexible power electronics,” Scientific reports, vol. 5, 2015. |
| Y. Oka et al., “Preparation of cathode film with use of aqueous solvent system”, 224th ECS Meeting (Abstract #851), Oct. 27, 2013, Nov. 1, 2013, XP055442472, San Francisco, CA, USA *part “Experimental procedures”*. |
| Herb Geduld , “Zinc Plating”, XP055290076, Columbia Chemical Corp., Macedonia, OH Jan. 1, 1988. |
| Fernando Yanez et al., “Macromolecule release and smoothness of semi-interpenetrating PVP-pHEMA networks for comfortable soft contact lenses”, European Journal of Pharmaceutics, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam, NL, vol. 69, No. 3, Aug. 1, 2008, pp. 1094-1103, XP023519572, ISSN: 0939-6411. |
| Elena A. Belyaeva et al., “Mechanism(s) of Toxic Action of Zn2+ and Selenite: A Study on AS-30D Hepatoma Cells and Isolated Mitochondria”, Biochemistry Research International, vol. 42, No. 6, Jan. 1, 2011, pp. 361-313. |
| Albano et al., “Design of an Implantable power supply for an intraocular sensor, using Power (power optimization for wireless energy requirements)” Journal of Power Soureces, Elsevier SA, CH, vol. 170, No. 1, Apr. 11, 2007, pp. 216-224. |
| Stani A. et al., “Development of flat plate rechargeable alkaline manganese dioxide-zinc cells”, Journal of Power Sources, Elsevier SA, vol. 153, No. 2, Jun. 28, 2005, pp. 405-412. |
| Benefits of PVC (Year: 2018), 1 page. |
| Beynw E., “3D System Integration Technologies”, 2006, IEEE, International Symposium on VLSI Technology, System and Applications, 2006, 9 pages. |
| Breakthrough Technologies Driving Successful Energy Harvesting-Powered Products, PSMA Energy Harvesting Forum, Mar. 2014. [retrieved on Jan. 22, 2018] Retrieved from the Internet:[URL:http://www.psma.com/sites/default/files/uploads/tech-forums-energy-harvesting/presentations/is 1-1-1-energy-harvesting-market -requirements-economicsv]. |
| Bruno L.J.S., et al., “Correlation Between Morphological Properties and Ionic Conductivity in an Electrolyte Based on Poly(Vinylidene Fluoride) and Poly(2-hydroxyethyl Methacrylate),” Materials Research, Feb. 2014, vol. 17 (1), pp. 115-120, XP055227556. |
| Cohen└addad J.P., et al., “NMR Study of the Demixing Process in Concentrated polyisobutylene Solutions,” Journal of Polymer Science: Polymer Physics Edition, Sep. 1981, vol. 19 (9), pp. 1395-1403. |
| Davies C., “Opto-Electronic Contact Lenses Promise Wireless Displays,” Nov. 2009. Retrieved from the Internet:[URL:http://www.slashgear.com/opto-electronic-contact-lenses-promise-wireless—displays-2564454/]. |
| Extended European Search Report for Application No. 13152733.5, dated Apr. 30, 2013, 7 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report for Application No. 13155410, dated Jun. 5, 2013, 5 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report for Application No. 13156410, dated Jun. 13, 2013, 8 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report for Application No. 14159971, dated Jun. 5, 2014, 6 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report for Application No. 18160035.4, dated Jun. 27, 2018, 20 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP13156428, dated Jun. 6, 2013, 9 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP15181836, dated Dec. 1, 2015, 12 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP15181868, dated Jan. 12, 2016, 12 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP15181875, dated Jun. 14, 2016, 12 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP13702567.2, dated Aug. 2, 2018, 8 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP15181799, dated Jun. 14, 2016, 23 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP15181817, dated Feb. 15, 2016, 13 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP15181854, dated May 18, 2016, 11 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP15181855, dated May 3, 2016, 13 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP15181857, dated Dec. 9, 2015, 8 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP15181860, dated Feb. 17, 2016, 15 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP15181862, dated Apr. 18, 2016, 12 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP15181863, dated Apr. 22, 2016, 14 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP15181865, dated Aug. 2, 2016, 21 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP15181872, dated Apr. 5, 2016, 12 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP15181874, dated Feb. 19, 2016, 11 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP16200268, dated Jan. 20, 2017, 8 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP16200270, dated Jan. 5, 2017, 8 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP17205191, dated Jan. 30, 2018, 14 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP18169197, dated Jul. 27, 2018, 8 pages. |
| Gosalia K.C., “Novel Compact Antennas for Biomedical Implants and Wireless Applications,” PhD Dissertation, North Carolina State University, 2004, [retrieved on Dec. 22, 2014] Retrieved from the Internet[URL:http://respitory.lib.ncsu.edu/ir/bitstream/1840.16/4508/1/etd.pdf?-origin=publication.sub.--detail]. |
| Herb G., Zinc Plating [Online], Jan. 1, 1988 [retrieved on Jul. 20, 2016]. Retrieved from the Internet: (URL:http://infohouse.p2ric.orgjref/29/28085.pdf), XP055290076. |
| Hill J., “How to Uniformly Disperse Nanoparticles in Battery Cathode Coatings,” Advanced Materials and Processes, May 2010, vol. 168 (5), pp. 34-36. |
| International Preliminary Report for Patentability for Application No. PCT/US2013/023005, dated Jul. 29, 2014, 5 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/US2009/057284, dated Mar. 22, 2011, 10 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/US2009/057289, dated Mar. 22, 2011, 6 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/US2012/026849, dated Sep. 3, 2013, 8 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/US2012/029769, dated Sep. 24, 2013, 10 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/US2012/048229, dated Feb. 4, 2014, 7 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/US2013/023097, dated Jul. 29, 2014, 11 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/US2013/023182, dated Jul. 29, 2014, 8 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/US2013/023190, dated Jul. 29, 2014, 8 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2013/023190, dated Apr. 15, 2013, 10 pages. |
| International Search Report for Application No. PCT/US2009/057284, dated May 4, 2010, 6 pages. |
| International Search Report for Application No. PCT/US2009/057289, dated Dec. 23, 2009, 3 pages. |
| International Search Report for Application No. PCT/US2012/023190, dated Apr. 15, 2013, 4 pages. |
| International Search Report for Application No. PCT/US2012/026849, dated Jul. 2, 2012, 5 pages. |
| International Search Report for Application No. PCT/US2012/029769, dated Oct. 2, 2012, 8 pages. |
| International Search Report for Application No. PCT/US2012/029796, dated Oct. 2, 2012, 4 pages. |
| International Search Report for Application No. PCT/US2012/048229, dated Nov. 21, 2012, 3 pages. |
| International Search Report for Application No. PCT/US2013/023005, dated Apr. 26, 2013, 4 pages. |
| International Search Report for Application No. PCT/US2013/023097, dated Aug. 7, 2013, 6 pages. |
| International Search Report for Application No. PCT/US2013/023182, dated Apr. 29, 2013, 4 pages. |
| Loy M., et al., “ISM-Band and Short Range Device Antennas,” Texas Instruments Application Report, Aug. 2005. Retrieved from the Internet:[URL:http://www.ti.com/lit/an/swra046a/swra046a.pdf]. |
| Neudecker B.J., et al., “Power Fibers: Thin-Film Batteries on Fiber Substrates,” Report Documented by ITN Energy Systems, Inc., Littleton, CO, 2003, pp. 1-9. |
| Orca S., “Micro Machines and Opto-Electronics on a Contact Lens”, Nov. 2009. Retrieved from the Internet:[URL:http://hplusmagazine.com/2009/11/20/micro-machines-and-opto-electronics-contact-lense/]. |
| Pandey J., et al., “A Fully Integrated RF-Powered Contact Lens With a Single Element Display,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems, Dec. 2010, vol. 4 (6), pp. 454-461. |
| Pandey J., et al., “Toward an Active Contact Lens: Integration of a Wireless Power Harvesting IC,” Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference, 2009, BioCAS 2009, pp. 125-128. Retrieved from the Internet[URL: https://wireless.ee.washington.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/17/2013/03/biocas2009_jnpyudobpo.pdf. |
| Partial European Search Report for Application No. 18160035.4, dated Apr. 19, 2018, 17 pages. |
| Partial European Search Report for Application No. EP15181799.6, dated Feb. 29, 2016, 9 pages. |
| Partial European Search Report for Application No. EP15181865, dated Apr. 11, 2016, 7 pages. |
| Parviz B.A., “Augmented Reality in a Contact Lens, A New Generation of Contact Lenses Built With Very Small Circuits and LEDs Promises Bionic Eyesight,” IEEE Spectrum.org/biomedical/bionics, [retrieved Jul. 10, 2012]. |
| Parviz B.A., “Augmented Reality in a Contact Lens,” IEEE Spectrum, Sep. 2009. Retrieved from the Internet:[URL:https://spectrum.ieee.org/biomedical/bionics/augmented-reality-in-a-contact-lens]. |
| Ratta V., “Crystallization, Morphology, Thermal Stability and Adhesive Properties of Novel High Performance Semicrystalline Polyimides,” Virginia Tech University, Chapter 4, PhD Dissertation defended Apr. 26, 1999. |
| Shi S., et al., “Flexible Asymmetric Supercapacitors Based on Ultrathin Two-dimensional Nanosheets With Outstanding Electrochemical Performance and Aesthetic Property—Supplementary Information (SI),” Scientific Reports, Feb. 11, 2014, vol. 3, Article No. 2598, pp. 1-10, XP055485252, Retrieved from the Internet: URL: https://media.nature.com/original/nature-assets/srep/2013/130906/srep02598/extref/srep02598-s1.pdf. |
| Singapore Search Report for Application No. SG-201300387-6, dated Jul. 4, 2013. |
| Singapore Written Opinion for Application No. SG11201404171Y, dated Mar. 31, 2015. |
| Tafur, J.P., et al., “Influence of the Ionic Liquid Type on the Gel Polymer Electrolytes Properties,” Membranes (Basel), Dec. 2015, vol. 5(4), pp. 752-771. |
| Williams A., “Swiss Startup Puts MEMS Sensor in Contact Lens,” Electronics Weekly.com, Mar. 25, 2010. Retrieved from the Internet[URL:https://www.electronicsweekly.com/technology-startups/general-technology-startups/swiss-startup-puts-mems-sensor-2010-03/swiss-startup-puts-mems-sensor.html]. |
| Written opinion for Application No. PCT/US2009/057284, dated May 4, 2010, 9 pages. |
| Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2009/057289, dated Mar. 22, 2011, 5 pages. |
| Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2012/026849, dated Aug. 31, 2013, 7 pages. |
| Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2012/029769, dated Sep. 21, 2013, 9 pages. |
| Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2012/048229, dated Feb. 2, 2014, 6 pages. |
| Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2013/023005, dated Jul. 26, 2014, 7 pages. |
| Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2013/023097, dated Jul. 26, 2014, 10 pages. |
| Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2013/023182, dated Jul. 26, 2014, 7 pages. |
| Jani Miettinen et al., “System Design Issue for 3D System-in-Package (SiP)”, 2004, vol. 1, p. 610-615. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20170168318 A1 | Jun 2017 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62040178 | Aug 2014 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 14827613 | Aug 2015 | US |
| Child | 15440953 | US |
