Device and methods for sealing and encapsulation for biocompatible energization elements

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10598958
  • Patent Number
    10,598,958
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, February 23, 2017
    7 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, March 24, 2020
    4 years ago
Abstract
Device and methods for sealing and encapsulation for biocompatible energization elements are described. In some examples, the device and methods for sealing and encapsulation for biocompatible energization elements involve heat welding, laser welding, or both where a laminar structure is enclosed by a polymer film capable of sealing. In some examples, a field of use for the apparatus and methods may include any biocompatible device or product that requires energization elements.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention


A device and methods for sealing and encapsulation for biocompatible energization elements are described. In some examples, a field of use for the device and methods for sealing and encapsulation for biocompatible energization elements may include any biocompatible device or product that requires energy.


2. Description of the Related Art


Recently, the number of medical devices and their functionality has begun to rapidly develop. These medical devices may include, for example, implantable pacemakers, electronic pills for monitoring and/or testing a biological function, surgical devices with active components, contact lenses, infusion pumps, and neurostimulators. Added functionality and an increase in performance to many of the aforementioned medical devices has been theorized and developed. However, to achieve the theorized added functionality, many of these devices now require self-contained energization means that are compatible with the size and shape requirements of these devices, as well as the energy requirements of the new energized components.


Some medical devices may include electrical components such as semiconductor devices that perform a variety of functions and may be incorporated into many biocompatible and/or implantable devices. However, such semiconductor components require energy and, thus, energization elements should preferably also be included in such biocompatible devices. The topology and relatively small size of the biocompatible devices may create challenging environments for the definition of various functionalities. In many examples, it may be important to provide safe, reliable, compact and cost effective means to energize the semiconductor components within the biocompatible devices. Therefore, a need exists for biocompatible energization elements formed for implantation within or upon biocompatible devices where the structure of the millimeter or smaller sized energization elements provides enhanced function for the energization element while maintaining biocompatibility.


Further, these energization elements may need to be protected from their environment in order to maintain functionality and performance. This may include fluid leaking into or out of the energization element. For example, a biocompatible battery placed in a contact lens may be exposed to tear fluid, which may potentially result in the fluid contacting both cathode and anode, thus shorting the battery. Therefore, a need exists for protecting energization elements from the outside environment.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Accordingly, devices and methods for sealing and encapsulation for biocompatible energization elements are disclosed which afford electrochemical and biocompatible advantages while maintaining the biocompatibility, performance and function necessary for biocompatible energization elements.


One general aspect comprises a biocompatible energization element encapsulated by a polymer film capable of sealing. The polymer film capable of sealing may be treated to form a seal with itself and with elements of the biocompatible energization element. Further, the polymer film capable of sealing may form an encapsulation around the energization element while maintaining a cavity structure within the biocompatible energization element. The biocompatible energization element may comprise: a first and second current collector, a cathode, an anode, an electrolyte, and a laminar structure including a cavity.


Implementations of the biocompatible energization element may comprise one or more of the following features. The polymer film capable of sealing may comprise polypropylene. The polymer film capable of sealing may be treated by a means of welding. The polymer film capable of sealing may be further adhered to the biocompatible energization element with adhesive. The polymer film capable of sealing may be welded to a separator contained within the biocompatible energization element. The polymer film capable of sealing may be welded to a separator shelf contained within the biocompatible energization element. The polymer film capable of sealing may be welded to a current collector of the biocompatible energization element. The biocompatible energization element may be used in a biomedical device. The biomedical device may be an ophthalmic device. The ophthalmic device may be a contact lens.


Another general aspect comprises a method for encapsulating a biocompatible energization element, wherein the method comprises: obtaining a first polymer film capable of sealing; placing a first current collector upon the first polymer capable of sealing; placing a first electrode upon the first current collector; placing a separator shelf upon the first current collector where the separator shelf surrounds the first electrode and where the separator shelf creates a defined cavity within the laminar structure; placing a separator upon the separator shelf where the separator will enclose the first electrode inside the cavity; placing a second electrode upon the separator; placing a second polymer capable of sealing upon the second current collector; and sealing together the first and second polymer capable of sealing to form a sealed and encapsulated energization element. The biocompatible energization element may comprise: a first and second current collector, a cathode, an anode, an electrolyte, and a laminar structure comprising a cavity.


Implementations of the method for encapsulating a biocompatible energization element may comprise one or more of the following features. The first and second polymer layers may comprise polypropylene. The sealing together of the first and second polymer capable of sealing may comprise welding. The sealing together of the first and second polymer capable of sealing may comprise adhering the first and second polymer capable of sealing with adhesive. The first and second polymer capable of sealing may comprise a combination of adhesives and welding of the first and second polymer capable of sealing. The method may further comprise adhering the first and second current collectors to the separator shelf with adhesive. The method may further comprise adhering the polymer film capable of sealing to the biocompatible energization element with adhesive. The method may further comprise metalizing a polymer film capable of sealing to form a metalized polymer film. The method may further comprise sealing the metalized polymer film with the energization element by welding. The method may further comprise sealing the metalized polymer film to a current collector by welding. The method may further comprise placing the biocompatible energization element into an insert. The method may also comprise placing the insert into a biomedical device. The biomedical device may be an ophthalmic device. The ophthalmic device may be a contact lens.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The foregoing and other features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following, more particular description of preferred embodiments of the invention, as illustrated in the accompanying drawings.



FIGS. 1A-1D illustrate exemplary aspects of biocompatible energization elements in concert with the exemplary application of contact lenses.



FIG. 2 illustrates the exemplary size and shape of individual cells of an exemplary battery design.



FIG. 3A illustrates a first stand-alone, packaged biocompatible energization element with exemplary anode and cathode connections.



FIG. 3B illustrates a second stand-alone, packaged biocompatible energization element with exemplary anode and cathode connections.



FIGS. 4A-4N illustrate exemplary method steps for the formation of biocompatible energization elements for biomedical devices.



FIG. 5 illustrates an exemplary fully formed biocompatible energization element.



FIGS. 6A-6F illustrate exemplary method steps for structural formation of biocompatible energization elements.



FIGS. 7A-7F illustrate exemplary method steps for structural formation of biocompatible energization elements utilizing an alternate electroplating method.



FIGS. 8A-8H illustrate exemplary method steps for the formation of biocompatible energization elements with hydrogel separator for biomedical devices.



FIGS. 9A-9C illustrate exemplary methods steps for the structural formation of biocompatible energization elements utilizing alternative hydrogel processing examples.



FIGS. 10A-10F illustrate optimized and non-optimized depositing of a cathode mixture into a cavity.



FIG. 11 illustrates agglomeration of a cathode mixture inside of a cavity.



FIGS. 12A-12F illustrate exemplary use of a gelled electrolyte in a biocompatible energization element.



FIGS. 13A-13C illustrate exemplary designs for sealing and encapsulating a biocompatible energization element.



FIGS. 14A-14I illustrate exemplary method steps for sealing and encapsulating a biocompatible energization element.



FIGS. 15A-15D illustrate exemplary cross-sectional views of an exemplary energization element.



FIGS. 16A-16G illustrate alternate exemplary method steps for sealing and encapsulating a biocompatible energization element.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Biofuel cells for use in a biocompatible battery are disclosed in this application. In the following sections, detailed descriptions of various examples are described. The descriptions of examples are exemplary embodiments only, and various modifications and alterations may be apparent to those skilled in the art. Therefore, the examples do not limit the scope of this application. The biofuel cells, and the structures that contain them, may be designed for use in biocompatible batteries. In some examples, these biocompatible batteries may be designed for use in, or proximate to, the body of a living organism.


Glossary


In the description and claims below, various terms may be used for which the following definitions will apply:


“Anode” as used herein refers to an electrode through which electric current flows into a polarized electrical device. The direction of electric current is typically opposite to the direction of electron flow. In other words, the electrons flow from the anode into, for example, an electrical circuit.


“Binder” as used herein refers to a polymer that is capable of exhibiting elastic responses to mechanical deformations and that is chemically compatible with other energization element components. For example, binders may include electroactive materials, electrolytes, polymers, and the like.


“Biocompatible” as used herein refers to a material or device that performs with an appropriate host response in a specific application. For example, a biocompatible device does not have toxic or injurious effects on biological systems.


“Cathode” as used herein refers to an electrode through which electric current flows out of a polarized electrical device. The direction of electric current is typically opposite to the direction of electron flow. Therefore, the electrons flow into the cathode of the polarized electrical device, and out of, for example, the connected electrical circuit.


“Coating” as used herein refers to a deposit of material in thin forms. In some uses, the term will refer to a thin deposit that substantially covers the surface of a substrate it is formed upon. In other more specialized uses, the term may be used to describe small thin deposits in smaller regions of the surface.


“Electrode” as used herein may refer to an active mass in the energy source. For example, it may include one or both of the anode and cathode.


“Energized” as used herein refers to the state of being able to supply electrical current or to have electrical energy stored within.


“Energy” as used herein refers to the capacity of a physical system to do work. Many uses of the energization elements may relate to the capacity of being able to perform electrical actions.


“Energy Source” or “Energization Element” or “Energization Device” as used herein refers to any device or layer which is capable of supplying energy or placing a logical or electrical device in an energized state. The energization elements may include batteries. The batteries may be formed from alkaline type cell chemistry and may be solid-state batteries or wet cell batteries.


“Fillers” as used herein refer to one or more energization element separators that do not react with either acid or alkaline electrolytes. Generally, fillers may include substantially water insoluble materials such as carbon black; coal dust; graphite; metal oxides and hydroxides such as those of silicon, aluminum, calcium, magnesium, barium, titanium, iron, zinc, and tin; metal carbonates such as those of calcium and magnesium; minerals such as mica, montmorillonite, kaolinite, attapulgite, and talc; synthetic and natural zeolites such as Portland cement; precipitated metal silicates such as calcium silicate; hollow or solid polymer or glass microspheres, flakes and fibers; and the like.


“Functionalized” as used herein refers to making a layer or device able to perform a function including, for example, energization, activation, and/or control.


“Ionizing Salt” as used herein refers to an ionic solid that will dissolve in a solvent to produce dissolved ions in solution. In numerous examples, the solvent may comprise water.


“Mold” as used herein refers to a rigid or semi-rigid object that may be used to form three-dimensional objects from uncured formulations. Some exemplary molds include two mold parts that, when opposed to one another, define the structure of a three-dimensional object.


“Power” as used herein refers to work done or energy transferred per unit of time.


“Rechargeable” or “Re-energizable” as used herein refer to a capability of being restored to a state with higher capacity to do work. Many uses may relate to the capability of being restored with the ability to flow electrical current at a certain rate for certain, reestablished time periods.


“Reenergize” or “Recharge” as used herein refer to restoring to a state with higher capacity to do work. Many uses may relate to restoring a device to the capability to flow electrical current at a certain rate for a certain reestablished time period.


“Released” as used herein and sometimes referred to as “released from a mold” means that a three-dimensional object is either completely separated from the mold, or is only loosely attached to the mold, so that it may be removed with mild agitation.


“Separator shelf” as used herein means an element of a biocompatible energization element used to avoid edge shorting around the separator by implementing A cut separator, liquid separator or combination of the two. A separator shelf may be a polymer such as polypropylene, machined (e.g. laser) and placed within the cell construct. It needs to be a material that can seal to the top and bottom package films. It may be another material such as glass or ceramic as long as it can be cut and sealed. Adhesive, lacquer, epoxy, asphalt, etc. may be used in combination with a rigid separator shelf.


“Stacked” as used herein means to place at least two component layers in proximity to each other such that at least a portion of one surface of one of the layers contacts a first surface of a second layer. In some examples, a coating, whether for adhesion or other functions, may reside between the two layers that are in contact with each other through said coating.


“Traces” as used herein refer to energization element components capable of connecting together the circuit components. For example, circuit traces may include copper or gold when the substrate is a printed circuit board and may typically be copper, gold or printed film in a flexible circuit. A special type of “Trace” is the current collector. Current collectors are traces with electrochemical compatibility that make the current collectors suitable for use in conducting electrons to and from an anode or cathode in the presence of electrolyte.


The methods and apparatus presented herein relate to forming biocompatible energization elements for inclusion within or on flat or three-dimensional biocompatible devices. A particular class of energization elements may be batteries that are fabricated in layers. The layers may also be classified as laminate layers. A battery formed in this manner may be classified as a laminar battery.


There may be other examples of how to assemble and configure batteries according to the present invention, and some may be described in following sections. However, for many of these examples, there are selected parameters and characteristics of the batteries that may be described in their own right. In the following sections, some characteristics and parameters will be focused upon.


Exemplary Biomedical Device Construction with Biocompatible Energization Elements


An example of a biomedical device that may incorporate the Energization Elements, batteries, of the present invention may be an electroactive focal-adjusting contact lens. Referring to FIG. 1A, an example of such a contact lens insert may be depicted as contact lens insert 100. In the contact lens insert 100, there may be an electroactive element 120 that may accommodate focal characteristic changes in response to controlling voltages. A circuit 105, to provide those controlling voltage signals as well as to provide other functions such as controlling sensing of the environment for external control signals, may be powered by a biocompatible battery element 110. As depicted in FIG. 1A, the battery element 110 may be found as multiple major pieces, in this case three pieces, and may include the various configurations of battery chemistry elements as discussed herein. The battery elements 110 may have various interconnect features to join together pieces as may be depicted underlying the region of interconnect 114. The battery elements 110 may be connected to a circuit element that may have its own substrate 111 upon which interconnect features 125 may be located. The circuit 105, which may be in the form of an integrated circuit, may be electrically and physically connected to the substrate 111 and its interconnect features 125.


Referring to FIG. 1B, a cross sectional relief of a contact lens 150 may comprise contact lens insert 100 and its discussed constituents. The contact lens insert 100 may be encapsulated into a skirt of contact lens hydrogel 155 which may encapsulate the contact lens insert 100 and provide a comfortable interface of the contact lens 150 to a user's eye.


In reference to concepts of the present invention, the battery elements may be formed in a two-dimensional form as depicted in FIG. 1C. In this depiction there may be two main regions of battery cells in the regions of battery component 165 and the second battery component in the region of battery chemistry element 160. The battery elements, which are depicted in flat form in FIG. 1C, may connect to a circuit element 163, which in the example of FIG. 1C may comprise two major circuit areas 167. The circuit element 163 may connect to the battery element at an electrical contact 161 and a physical contact 162. The flat structure may be folded into a three-dimensional conical structure as has been described with respect to the present invention. In that process a second electrical contact 166 and a second physical contact 164 may be used to connect and physically stabilize the three-dimensional structure. Referring to FIG. 1D, a representation of this three-dimensional conical structure 180 may be found. The physical and electrical contact points 181 may also be found and the illustration may be viewed as a three-dimensional view of the resulting structure. This structure may include the modular electrical and battery component that will be incorporated with a lens insert into a biocompatible device.


Segmented Battery Schemes


Referring to FIG. 2, an example of different types of segmented battery schemes is depicted for an exemplary battery element for a contact lens type example. The segmented components may be relatively circular-shaped 271, square-shaped 272 or rectangular-shaped. In rectangular-shaped examples, the rectangles may be small rectangular shapes 273, larger rectangular shapes 274, or even larger rectangular shapes 275.


Custom Shapes of Flat Battery Elements


In some examples of biocompatible batteries, the batteries may be formed as flat elements. Referring to FIG. 3A, an example of a rectangular outline 310 of the battery element may be depicted with an anode connection 311 and a cathode connection 312. Referring to FIG. 3B, an example of a circular outline 330 of a battery element may be depicted with an anode connection 331 and a cathode connection 332.


In some examples of flat-formed batteries, the outlines of the battery form may be dimensionally and geometrically configured to fit in custom products. In addition to examples with rectangular or circular outlines, custom “free-form” or “free shape” outlines may be formed which may allow the battery configuration to be optimized to fit within a given product.


In the exemplary biomedical device case of a variable optic, a “free-form” example of a flat outline may be arcuate in form. The free form may be of such geometry that when formed to a three-dimensional shape, it may take the form of a conical, annular skirt that fits within the constraining confines of a contact lens. It may be clear that similar beneficial geometries may be formed where medical devices have restrictive 2D or 3D shape requirements.


Biocompatibility Aspects of Batteries


As an example, the batteries according to the present invention may have important aspects relating to safety and biocompatibility. In some examples, batteries for biomedical devices may need to meet requirements above and beyond those for typical usage scenarios. In some examples, design aspects may be considered related to stressing events. For example, the safety of an electronic contact lens may need to be considered in the event a user breaks the lens during insertion or removal. In another example, design aspects may consider the potential for a user to be struck in the eye by a foreign object. Still further examples of stressful conditions that may be considered in developing design parameters and constraints may relate to the potential for a user to wear the lens in challenging environments like the environment under water or the environment at high altitude in non-limiting examples.


The safety of such a device may be influenced by the materials that the device is formed with or from, by the quantities of those materials employed in manufacturing the device, and also by the packaging applied to separate the devices from the surrounding on- or in-body environment. In an example, pacemakers may be a typical type of biomedical device which may include a battery and which may be implanted in a user for an extended period of time. Accordingly, in some examples, such pacemakers may typically be packaged with welded, hermetic titanium enclosures, or in other examples, multiple layers of encapsulation. Emerging powered biomedical devices may present new challenges for packaging, especially battery packaging. These new devices may be much smaller than existing biomedical devices, for example, an electronic contact lens or pill camera may be significantly smaller than a pacemaker. In such examples, the volume and area available for packaging may be greatly reduced.


Electrical Requirements of Microbatteries


Another area for design considerations may relate to electrical requirements of the device, which may be provided by the battery. In order to function as a power source for a medical device, an appropriate battery may need to meet the full electrical requirements of the system when operating in a non-connected or non-externally powered mode. An emerging field of non-connected or non-externally powered biomedical devices may include, for example, vision-correcting contact lenses, health monitoring devices, pill cameras, and novelty devices. Recent developments in integrated circuit (IC) technology may permit meaningful electrical operation at very low current levels, for example, picoamps of standby current and microamps of operating current. IC's may also permit very small devices.


Microbatteries for biomedical applications may be required to meet many simultaneous, challenging requirements. For example, the microbattery may be required to have the capability to deliver a suitable operating voltage to an incorporated electrical circuit. This operating voltage may be influenced by several factors including the IC process “node,” the output voltage from the circuit to another device, and a particular current consumption target which may also relate to a desired device lifetime.


With respect to the IC process, nodes may typically be differentiated by the minimum feature size of a transistor, such as its “so-called” transistor channel. This physical feature, along with other parameters of the IC fabrication, such as gate oxide thickness, may be associated with a resulting rating standard for “turn-on” or “threshold” voltages of field-effect transistors (FET's) fabricated in the given process node. For example, in a node with a minimum feature size of 0.5 microns, it may be common to find FET's with turn-on voltages of 5.0V. However, at a minimum feature size of 90 nm, the FET's may turn-on at 1.2, 1.8, and 2.5V. The IC foundry may supply standard cells of digital blocks, for example, inverters and flip-flops that have been characterized and are rated for use over certain voltage ranges. Designers chose an IC process node based on several factors including density of digital devices, analog/digital mixed signal devices, leakage current, wiring layers, and availability of specialty devices such as high-voltage FET's. Given these parametric aspects of the electrical components, which may draw power from a microbattery, it may be important for the microbattery power source to be matched to the requirements of the chosen process node and IC design, especially in terms of available voltage and current.


In some examples, an electrical circuit powered by a microbattery, may connect to another device. In non-limiting examples, the microbattery-powered electrical circuit may connect to an actuator or a transducer. Depending on the application, these may include a light-emitting diode (LED), a sensor, a microelectromechanical system (MEMS) pump, or numerous other such devices. In some examples, such connected devices may require higher operating voltage conditions than common IC process nodes. For example, a variable-focus lens may require 35V to activate. The operating voltage provided by the battery may therefore be a critical consideration when designing such a system. In some examples of this type of consideration, the efficiency of a lens driver to produce 35V from a 1V battery may be significantly less than it might be when operating from a 2V battery. Further requirements, such as die size, may be dramatically different considering the operating parameters of the microbattery as well.


Individual battery cells may typically be rated with open-circuit, loaded, and cutoff voltages. The open-circuit voltage is the potential produced by the battery cell with infinite load resistance. The loaded voltage is the potential produced by the cell with an appropriate, and typically also specified, load impedance placed across the cell terminals. The cutoff voltage is typically a voltage at which most of the battery has been discharged. The cutoff voltage may represent a voltage, or degree of discharge, below which the battery should not be discharged to avoid deleterious effects such as excessive gassing. The cutoff voltage may typically be influenced by the circuit to which the battery is connected, not just the battery itself, for example, the minimum operating voltage of the electronic circuit. In one example, an alkaline cell may have an open-circuit voltage of 1.6V, a loaded voltage in the range 1.0 to 1.5V, and a cutoff voltage of 1.0V. The voltage of a given microbattery cell design may depend upon other factors of the cell chemistry employed. And, different cell chemistry may therefore have different cell voltages.


Cells may be connected in series to increase voltage; however, this combination may come with tradeoffs to size, internal resistance, and battery complexity. Cells may also be combined in parallel configurations to decrease resistance and increase capacity; however, such a combination may tradeoff size and shelf life.


Battery capacity may be the ability of a battery to deliver current, or do work, for a period of time. Battery capacity may typically be specified in units such as microamp-hours. A battery that may deliver 1 microamp of current for 1 hour has 1 microamp-hour of capacity. Capacity may typically be increased by increasing the mass (and hence volume) of reactants within a battery device; however, it may be appreciated that biomedical devices may be significantly constrained on available volume. Battery capacity may also be influenced by electrode and electrolyte material.


Depending on the requirements of the circuitry to which the battery is connected, a battery may be required to source current over a range of values. During storage prior to active use, a leakage current on the order of picoamps to nanoamps may flow through circuits, interconnects, and insulators. During active operation, circuitry may consume quiescent current to sample sensors, run timers, and perform such low power consumption functions. Quiescent current consumption may be on the order of nanoamps to milliamps. Circuitry may also have even higher peak current demands, for example, when writing flash memory or communicating over radio frequency (RF). This peak current may extend to tens of milliamps or more. The resistance and impedance of a microbattery device may also be important to design considerations.


Shelf life typically refers to the period of time which a battery may survive in storage and still maintain useful operating parameters. Shelf life may be particularly important for biomedical devices for several reasons. Electronic devices may displace non-powered devices, as for example may be the case for the introduction of an electronic contact lens. Products in these existing market spaces may have established shelf life requirements, for example, three years, due to customer, supply chain, and other requirements. It may typically be desired that such specifications not be altered for new products. Shelf life requirements may also be set by the distribution, inventory, and use methods of a device including a microbattery. Accordingly, microbatteries for biomedical devices may have specific shelf life requirements, which may be, for example, measured in the number of years.


In some examples, three-dimensional biocompatible energization elements may be rechargeable. For example, an inductive coil may also be fabricated on the three-dimensional surface. The inductive coil could then be energized with a radio-frequency (“RF”) fob. The inductive coil may be connected to the three-dimensional biocompatible energization element to recharge the energization element when RF is applied to the inductive coil. In another example, photovoltaics may also be fabricated on the three-dimensional surface and connected to the three-dimensional biocompatible energization element. When exposed to light or photons, the photovoltaics will produce electrons to recharge the energization element.


In some examples, a battery may function to provide the electrical energy for an electrical system. In these examples, the battery may be electrically connected to the circuit of the electrical system. The connections between a circuit and a battery may be classified as interconnects. These interconnects may become increasingly challenging for biomedical microbatteries due to several factors. In some examples, powered biomedical devices may be very small thus allowing little area and volume for the interconnects. The restrictions of size and area may impact the electrical resistance and reliability of the interconnections.


In other respects, a battery may contain a liquid electrolyte which could boil at high temperature. This restriction may directly compete with the desire to use a solder interconnect which may, for example, require relatively high temperatures such as 250 degrees Celsius to melt. Although in some examples, the battery chemistry, including the electrolyte, and the heat source used to form solder based interconnects, may be isolated spatially from each other. In the cases of emerging biomedical devices, the small size may preclude the separation of electrolyte and solder joints by sufficient distance to reduce heat conduction.


Interconnects


Interconnects may allow current to flow to and from the battery in connection with an external circuit. Such interconnects may interface with the environments inside and outside the battery, and may cross the boundary or seal between those environments. These interconnects may be considered as traces, making connections to an external circuit, passing through the battery seal, and then connecting to the current collectors inside the battery. As such, these interconnects may have several requirements. Outside the battery, the interconnects may resemble typical printed circuit traces. They may be soldered to, or otherwise connect to, other traces. In an example where the battery is a separate physical element from a circuit board comprising an integrated circuit, the battery interconnect may allow for connection to the external circuit. This connection may be formed with solder, conductive tape, conductive ink or epoxy, or other means. The interconnect traces may need to survive in the environment outside the battery, for example, not corroding in the presence of oxygen.


As the interconnect passes through the battery seal, it may be of critical importance that the interconnect coexist with the seal and permit sealing. Adhesion may be required between the seal and interconnect in addition to the adhesion which may be required between the seal and battery package. Seal integrity may need to be maintained in the presence of electrolyte and other materials inside the battery. Interconnects, which may typically be metallic, may be known as points of failure in battery packaging. The electrical potential and/or flow of current may increase the tendency for electrolyte to “creep” along the interconnect. Accordingly, an interconnect may need to be engineered to maintain seal integrity.


Inside the battery, the interconnects may interface with the current collectors or may actually form the current collectors. In this regard, the interconnect may need to meet the requirements of the current collectors as described herein, or may need to form an electrical connection to such current collectors.


One class of candidate interconnects and current collectors is metal foils. Such foils are available in thickness of 25 microns or less, which make them suitable for very thin batteries. Such foil may also be sourced with low surface roughness and contamination, two factors which may be critical for battery performance. The foils may include zinc, nickel, brass, copper, titanium, other metals, and various alloys.


Modular Battery Components


In some examples, a modular battery component may be formed according to some aspects and examples of the present invention. In these examples, the modular battery assembly may be a separate component from other parts of the biomedical device. In the example of an ophthalmic contact lens device, such a design may include a modular battery that is separate from the rest of a media insert. There may be numerous advantages of forming a modular battery component. For example, in the example of the contact lens, a modular battery component may be formed in a separate, non-integrated process which may alleviate the need to handle rigid, three-dimensionally formed optical plastic components. In addition, the sources of manufacturing may be more flexible and may operate in a more parallel mode to the manufacturing of the other components in the biomedical device. Furthermore, the fabrication of the modular battery components may be decoupled from the characteristics of three-dimensional (3D) shaped devices. For example, in applications requiring three-dimensional final forms, a modular battery system may be fabricated in a flat or roughly two-dimensional (2D) perspective and then shaped to the appropriate three-dimensional shape. A modular battery component may be tested independently of the rest of the biomedical device and yield loss due to battery components may be sorted before assembly. The resulting modular battery component may be utilized in various media insert constructs that do not have an appropriate rigid region upon which the battery components may be formed; and, in a still further example, the use of modular battery components may facilitate the use of different options for fabrication technologies than might otherwise be utilized, such as, web-based technology (roll to roll), sheet-based technology (sheet-to-sheet), printing, lithography, and “squeegee” processing. In some examples of a modular battery, the discrete containment aspect of such a device may result in additional material being added to the overall biomedical device construct. Such effects may set a constraint for the use of modular battery solutions when the available space parameters require minimized thickness or volume of solutions.


Battery shape requirements may be driven at least in part by the application for which the battery is to be used. Traditional battery form factors may be cylindrical forms or rectangular prisms, made of metal, and may be geared toward products which require large amounts of power for long durations. These applications may be large enough that they may comprise large form factor batteries. In another example, planar (2D) solid-state batteries are thin rectangular prisms, typically formed upon inflexible silicon or glass. These planar solid-state batteries may be formed in some examples using silicon wafer-processing technologies. In another type of battery form factor, low power, flexible batteries may be formed in a pouch construct, using thin foils or plastic to contain the battery chemistry. These batteries may be made flat (2D), and may be designed to function when bowed to a modest out-of-plane (3D) curvature.


In some of the examples of the battery applications in the present invention where the battery may be employed in a variable optic lens, the form factor may require a three-dimensional curvature of the battery component where a radius of that curvature may be on the order of approximately 8.4 mm. The nature of such a curvature may be considered to be relatively steep and for reference may approximate the type of curvature found on a human fingertip. The nature of a relative steep curvature creates challenging aspects for manufacture. In some examples of the present invention, a modular battery component may be designed such that it may be fabricated in a flat, two-dimensional manner and then formed into a three-dimensional form of relative high curvature.


Battery Module Thickness


In designing battery components for biomedical applications, tradeoffs amongst the various parameters may be made balancing technical, safety and functional requirements. The thickness of the battery component may be an important and limiting parameter. For example, in an optical lens application the ability of a device to be comfortably worn by a user may have a critical dependence on the thickness across the biomedical device. Therefore, there may be critical enabling aspects in designing the battery for thinner results. In some examples, battery thickness may be determined by the combined thicknesses of top and bottom sheets, spacer sheets, and adhesive layer thicknesses. Practical manufacturing aspects may drive certain parameters of film thickness to standard values in available sheet stock. In addition, the films may have minimum thickness values to which they may be specified base upon technical considerations relating to chemical compatibility, moisture/gas impermeability, surface finish, and compatibility with coatings that may be deposited upon the film layers.


In some examples, a desired or goal thickness of a finished battery component may be a component thickness that is less than 220 μm. In these examples, this desired thickness may be driven by the three-dimensional geometry of an exemplary ophthalmic lens device where the battery component may need to be fit inside the available volume defined by a hydrogel lens shape given end user comfort, biocompatibility, and acceptance constraints. This volume and its effect on the needs of battery component thickness may be a function of total device thickness specification as well as device specification relating to its width, cone angle, and inner diameter. Another important design consideration for the resulting battery component design may relate to the volume available for active battery chemicals and materials in a given battery component design with respect to the resulting chemical energy that may result from that design. This resulting chemical energy may then be balanced for the electrical requirements of a functional biomedical device for its targeted life and operating conditions


Battery Module Flexibility


Another dimension of relevance to battery design and to the design of related devices that utilize battery based energy sources is the flexibility of the battery component. There may be numerous advantages conferred by flexible battery forms. For example, a flexible battery module may facilitate the previously mentioned ability to fabricate the battery form in a two-dimensional (2D) flat form. The flexibility of the form may allow the two-dimensional battery to then be formed into an appropriate 3D shape to fit into a biomedical device such as a contact lens.


In another example of the benefits that may be conferred by flexibility in the battery module, if the battery and the subsequent device is flexible then there may be advantages relating to the use of the device. In an example, a contact lens form of a biomedical device may have advantages for insertion/removal of the media insert based contact lens that may be closer to the insertion/removal of a standard, non-filled hydrogel contact lens.


The number of flexures may be important to the engineering of the battery. For example, a battery which may only flex one time from a planar form into a shape suitable for a contact lens may have significantly different design from a battery capable of multiple flexures. The flexure of the battery may also extend beyond the ability to mechanically survive the flexure event. For example, an electrode may be physically capable of flexing without breaking, but the mechanical and electrochemical properties of the electrode may be altered by flexure. Flex-induced changes may appear instantly, for example, as changes to impedance, or flexure may introduce changes which are only apparent in long-term shelf life testing.


Battery Module Width


There may be numerous applications into which the biocompatible energization elements or batteries of the present invention may be utilized. In general, the battery width requirement may be largely a function of the application in which it is applied. In an exemplary case, a contact lens battery system may have constrained needs for the specification on the width of a modular battery component. In some examples of an ophthalmic device where the device has a variable optic function powered by a battery component, the variable optic portion of the device may occupy a central spherical region of about 7.0 mm in diameter. The exemplary battery elements may be considered as a three-dimensional object, which fits as an annular, conical skirt around the central optic and formed into a truncated conical ring. If the required maximum diameter of the rigid insert is a diameter of 8.50 mm, and tangency to a certain diameter sphere may be targeted (as for example in a roughly 8.40 mm diameter), then geometry may dictate what the allowable battery width may be. There may be geometric models that may be useful for calculating desirable specifications for the resulting geometry which in some examples may be termed a conical frustum flattened into a sector of an annulus.


Flattened battery width may be driven by two features of the battery element, the active battery components and seal width. In some examples relating to ophthalmic devices a target thickness may be between 0.100 mm and 0.500 mm per side, and the active battery components may be targeted at approximately 0.800 mm wide. Other biomedical devices may have differing design constraints but the principles for flexible flat battery elements may apply in similar fashion.


Cavities as Design Elements in Battery Component Design


In some examples, battery elements may be designed in manners that segment the regions of active battery chemistry. There may be numerous advantages from the division of the active battery components into discrete segments. In a non-limiting example, the fabrication of discrete and smaller elements may facilitate production of the elements. The function of battery elements including numerous smaller elements may be improved. Defects of various kinds may be segmented and non-functional elements may be isolated in some cases to result in decreased loss of function. This may be relevant in examples where the loss of battery electrolyte may occur. The isolation of individualized components may allow for a defect that results in leakage of electrolyte out of the critical regions of the battery to limit the loss of function to that small segment of the total battery element whereas the electrolyte loss through the defect could empty a significantly larger region for batteries configured as a single cell. Smaller cells may result in lowered volume of active battery chemicals on an overall perspective, but the mesh of material surrounding each of the smaller cells may result in a strengthening of the overall structure.


Battery Element Separators


Batteries of the type described in the present invention may utilize a separator material that physically and electrically separates the anode and anode current collector portions from the cathode and cathode current collector portions. The separator may be a membrane that is permeable to water and dissolved electrolyte components; however, it may typically be electrically non-conductive. While a myriad of commercially-available separator materials may be known to those of skill in the art, the novel form factor of the present invention may present unique constraints on the task of separator selection, processing, and handling.


Since the designs of the present invention may have ultra-thin profiles, the choice may be limited to the thinnest separator materials typically available. For example, separators of approximately 25 microns in thickness may be desirable. Some examples which may be advantageous may be about 12 microns in thickness. There may be numerous acceptable commercial separators include microfibrillated, microporous polyethylene monolayer and/or polypropylene-polyethylene-polypropylene (PP/PE/PP) trilayer separator membranes such as those produced by Celgard (Charlotte, N.C.). A desirable example of separator material may be Celgard M824 PP/PE/PP trilayer membrane having a thickness of 12 microns. Alternative examples of separator materials useful for examples of the present invention may include separator membranes including regenerated cellulose (e.g. cellophane).


While PP/PE/PP trilayer separator membranes may have advantageous thickness and mechanical properties, owing to their polyolefinic character, they may also suffer from a number of disadvantages that may need to be overcome in order to make them useful in examples of the present invention. Roll or sheet stock of PP/PE/PP trilayer separator materials may have numerous wrinkles or other form errors that may be deleterious to the micron-level tolerances applicable to the batteries described herein. Furthermore, polyolefin separators may need to be cut to ultra-precise tolerances for inclusion in the present designs, which may therefore implicate laser cutting as an exemplary method of forming discrete current collectors in desirable shapes with tight tolerances. Owing to the polyolefinic character of these separators, certain cutting lasers useful for micro fabrication may employ laser wavelengths, e.g. 355 nm, that will not cut polyolefins. The polyolefins do not appreciably absorb the laser energy and are thereby non-ablatable. Finally, polyolefin separators may not be inherently wettable to aqueous electrolytes used in the batteries described herein.


Nevertheless, there may be methods for overcoming these inherent limitations for polyolefinic type membranes. In order to present a microporous separator membrane to a high-precision cutting laser for cutting pieces into arc segments or other advantageous separator designs, the membrane may need to be flat and wrinkle-free. If these two conditions are not met, the separator membrane may not be fully cut because the cutting beam may be inhibited as a result of defocusing of or otherwise scattering the incident laser energy. Additionally, if the separator membrane is not flat and wrinkle-free, the form accuracy and geometric tolerances of the separator membrane may not be sufficiently achieved. Allowable tolerances for separators of current examples may be, for example, +0 microns and −20 microns with respect to characteristic lengths and/or radii. There may be advantages for tighter tolerances of +0 microns and −10 micron and further for tolerances of +0 microns and −5 microns. Separator stock material may be made flat and wrinkle-free by temporarily laminating the material to a float glass carrier with an appropriate low-volatility liquid. Low-volatility liquids may have advantages over temporary adhesives due to the fragility of the separator membrane and due to the amount of processing time that may be required to release separator membrane from an adhesive layer. Furthermore, in some examples achieving a flat and wrinkle-free separator membrane on float glass using a liquid has been observed to be much more facile than using an adhesive. Prior to lamination, the separator membrane may be made free of particulates. This may be achieved by ultrasonic cleaning of separator membrane to dislodge any surface-adherent particulates. In some examples, handling of a separator membrane may be done in a suitable, low-particle environment such as a laminar flow hood or a cleanroom of at least class 10,000. Furthermore, the float glass substrate may be made to be particulate free by rinsing with an appropriate solvent, ultrasonic cleaning, and/or wiping with clean room wipes.


While a wide variety of low-volatility liquids may be used for the mechanical purpose of laminating microporous polyolefin separator membranes to a float glass carrier, specific requirements may be imposed on the liquid to facilitate subsequent laser cutting of discrete separator shapes. One requirement may be that the liquid has a surface tension low enough to soak into the pores of the separator material which may easily be verified by visual inspection. In some examples, the separator material turns from a white color to a translucent appearance when liquid fills the micropores of the material. It may be desirable to choose a liquid that may be benign and “safe” for workers that will be exposed to the preparation and cutting operations of the separator. It may be desirable to choose a liquid whose vapor pressure may be low enough so that appreciable evaporation does not occur during the time scale of processing (on the order of 1 day). Finally, in some examples the liquid may have sufficient solvating power to dissolve advantageous UV absorbers that may facilitate the laser cutting operation. In an example, it has been observed that a 12 percent (w/w) solution of avobenzone UV absorber in benzyl benzoate solvent may meet the aforementioned requirements and may lend itself to facilitating the laser cutting of polyolefin separators with high precision and tolerance in short order without an excessive number of passes of the cutting laser beam. In some examples, separators may be cut with an 8 W 355 nm nanosecond diode-pumped solid state laser using this approach where the laser may have settings for low power attenuation (e.g. 3 percent power), a moderate speed of 1 to 10 mm/s, and only 1 to 3 passes of the laser beam. While this UV-absorbing oily composition has been proven to be an effective laminating and cutting process aid, other oily formulations may be envisaged by those of skill in the art and used without limitation.


In some examples, a separator may be cut while fixed to a float glass. One advantage of laser cutting separators while fixed to a float glass carrier may be that a very high number density of separators may be cut from one separator stock sheet much like semiconductor die may be densely arrayed on a silicon wafer. Such an approach may provide economy of scale and parallel processing advantages inherent in semiconductor processes. Furthermore, the generation of scrap separator membrane may be minimized. Once separators have been cut, the oily process aid fluid may be removed by a series of extraction steps with miscible solvents, the last extraction may be performed with a high-volatility solvent such as isopropyl alcohol in some examples. Discrete separators, once extracted, may be stored indefinitely in any suitable low-particle environment.


As previously mentioned polyolefin separator membranes may be inherently hydrophobic and may need to be made wettable to aqueous surfactants used in the batteries of the present invention. One approach to make the separator membranes wettable may be oxygen plasma treatment. For example, separators may be treated for 1 to 5 minutes in a 100 percent oxygen plasma at a wide variety of power settings and oxygen flow rates. While this approach may improve wettability for a time, it may be well-known that plasma surface modifications provide a transient effect that may not last long enough for robust wetting of electrolyte solutions. Another approach to improve wettability of separator membranes may be to treat the surface by incorporating a suitable surfactant on the membrane. In some cases, the surfactant may be used in conjunction with a hydrophilic polymeric coating that remains within the pores of the separator membrane.


Another approach to provide more permanence to the hydrophilicity imparted by an oxidative plasma treatment may be by subsequent treatment with a suitable hydrophilic organosilane. In this manner, the oxygen plasma may be used to activate and impart functional groups across the entire surface area of the microporous separator. The organosilane may then covalently bond to and/or non-covalently adhere to the plasma treated surface. In examples using an organosilane, the inherent porosity of the microporous separator may not be appreciably changed, monolayer surface coverage may also be possible and desired. Prior art methods incorporating surfactants in conjunction with polymeric coatings may require stringent controls over the actual amount of coating applied to the membrane, and may then be subject to process variability. In extreme cases, pores of the separator may become blocked, thereby adversely affecting utility of the separator during the operation of the electrochemical cell. An exemplary organosilane useful in the present invention may be (3-aminopropyl) triethoxysilane. Other hydrophilic organosilanes may be known to those of skill in the art and may be used without limitation.


Still another method for making separator membranes wettable by aqueous electrolyte may be the incorporation of a suitable surfactant in the electrolyte formulation. One consideration in the choice of surfactant for making separator membranes wettable may be the effect that the surfactant may have on the activity of one or more electrodes within the electrochemical cell, for example, by increasing the electrical impedance of the cell. In some cases, surfactants may have advantageous anti-corrosion properties, specifically in the case of zinc anodes in aqueous electrolytes. Zinc may be an example known to undergo a slow reaction with water to liberate hydrogen gas, which may be undesirable. Numerous surfactants may be known by those of skill in the art to limit rates of said reaction to advantageous levels. In other cases, the surfactant may so strongly interact with the zinc electrode surface that battery performance may be impeded. Consequently, much care may need to be made in the selection of appropriate surfactant types and loading levels to ensure that separator wettability may be obtained without deleteriously affecting electrochemical performance of the cell. In some cases, a plurality of surfactants may be used, one being present to impart wettability to the separator membrane and the other being present to facilitate anti-corrosion properties to the zinc anode. In one example, no hydrophilic treatment is done to the separator membrane and a surfactant or plurality of surfactants is added to the electrolyte formulation in an amount sufficient to effect wettability of the separator membrane.


Discrete separators may be integrated into the laminar microbattery by direct placement into a means for storage including a designed cavity, pocket, or structure within the assembly. Desirably, this storage means may be formed by a laminar structure having a cutout, which may be a geometric offset of the separator shape, resulting in a cavity, pocket, or structure within the assembly. Furthermore, the storage means may have a ledge or step on which the separator rests during assembly. The ledge or step may optionally include a pressure-sensitive adhesive which retains the discrete separator. Advantageously, the pressure-sensitive adhesive may be the same one used in the construction and stack up of other elements of an exemplary laminar microbattery.


Exemplary Illustrated Processing of Biocompatible Energization—Placed Separator


An example of the steps that may be involved in processing biocompatible energization elements may be found referring to FIGS. 4A-4N. The processing at some of the exemplary steps may be found in the individual figures. In FIG. 4A, a combination of a PET Cathode Spacer 401 and a PET Gap Spacer 404 is illustrated. The PET Cathode Spacer 401 may be formed by applying films of PET 403 which, for example, may be approximately 3 mils thick. On either side of the PET layer may be found PSA layers or these may be capped with a PVDF release layer 402 which may be approximately 1 mil in thickness. The PET Gap spacer 404 may be formed of a PVDF layer 409 which may be approximately 3 mils in thickness. There may be a capping PET layer 405 which may be approximately 0.5 mils in thickness. Between the PVDF layer 409 and the capping PET layer 405, in some examples, may be a layer of PSA.


Proceeding to FIG. 4B, a hole 406 in the PET Gap spacer layer 404 may be cut by laser cutting treatment. Next at FIG. 4C, the cut PET Gap spacer layer 404 may be laminated 408 to the PET Cathode Spacer layer 401. Proceeding to FIG. 4D, a cathode spacer hole 410 may be cut by laser cutting treatment. The alignment of this cutting step may be registered to the previously cut features in the PET Gap spacer layer 404. At FIG. 4E, a layer of Celgard 412, for an ultimate separator layer, may be bonded to a carrier 411. Proceeding to FIG. 4F, the Celgard material may be cut to figures that are between the size of the previous two laser cut holes, and approximately the size of the hole 406 in the PET gap spacer, forming a precut separator 420. Proceeding to FIG. 4G, a pick and place tool 421 may be used to pick and place discrete pieces of Celgard into their desired locations on the growing device. At FIG. 4H, the placed Celgard pieces 422 are fastened into place and then the PVDF release layer 423 may be removed. Proceeding to FIG. 4I, the growing device structure may be bonded to a film of the anode 425. The anode 425 may comprise an anode collector film upon which a zinc anode film has been electrodeposited.


Proceeding to FIG. 4J, a cathode slurry 430 may be placed into the formed gap. A squeegee 431 may be used in some examples to spread the cathode mix across a work piece and in the process fill the gaps of the battery devices being formed. After filling, the remaining PVDF release layer 432 may be removed which may result in the structure illustrated in FIG. 4K. At FIG. 4L the entire structure may be subjected to a drying process which may shrink the cathode slurry 440 to also be at the height of the PET layer top. Proceeding to FIG. 4M, a cathode film layer 450, which may already have the cathode collector film upon it, may be bonded to the growing structure. In a final illustration at FIG. 4N a laser cutting process may be performed to remove side regions 460 and yield a battery element 470. There may be numerous alterations, deletions, changes to materials and thickness targets that may be useful within the intent of the present invention.


The result of the exemplary processing is depicted in some detail at FIG. 5. In an example, the following reference features may be defined. The cathode chemistry 510 may be located in contact with the cathode and cathode collector 520. A pressure-sensitive adhesive layer 530 may hold and seal the cathode collector 520 to a PET Spacer layer 540. On the other side of the PET Spacer layer 540, may be another PSA layer 550, which seals and adheres the PET Spacer layer 540 to the PET Gap layer 560. Another PSA layer 565 may seal and adhere the PET Gap layer 560 to the Anode and Anode Current Collector layers. A zinc Plated layer 570 may be plated onto the Anode Current Collector 580. The separator layer 590 may be located within the structure to perform the associated functions as have been defined in the present invention. In some examples, an electrolyte may be added during the processing of the device, in other examples, the separator may already include electrolyte.


Exemplary Processing Illustration of Biocompatible Energization—Deposited Separator


An example of the steps that may be involved in processing biocompatible energization elements is found in FIGS. 6A-6F. The processing at some of the exemplary steps may be found in the individual figures. There may be numerous alterations, deletions, changes to materials and thickness targets that may be useful within the intent of the present invention.


In FIG. 6A, a laminar construct 600 is illustrated. The laminar structure may comprise two laminar construct release layers, 602 and 602a; two laminar construct adhesive layers 604 and 604a, located between the laminar construct release layers 602 and 602a; and a laminar construct core 606, located between the two laminar construct adhesive layers 604 and 604a. The laminar construct release layers, 602 and 602a, and adhesive layers, 604 and 604a, may be produced or purchased, such as a commercially available pressure-sensitive adhesive transfer tape with primary liner layer. The laminar construct adhesive layers may be a PVDF layer which may be approximately 1-3 millimeters in thickness and cap the laminar construct core 606. The laminar construct core 606 may comprise a thermoplastic polymer resin such as polyethylene terephthalate, which, for example, may be approximately 3 millimeters thick. Proceeding to FIG. 6B, a means for storing the cathode mixture, such as a cavity for the cathode pocket 608, may be cut in the laminar construct by laser cutting treatment.


Next, at FIG. 6C, the bottom laminar construct release layer 602a may be removed from the laminar construct, exposing the laminar construct adhesive layer 604a. The laminar construct adhesive layer 604a may then be used to adhere an anode connection foil 610 to cover the bottom opening of the cathode pocket 608. Proceeding to FIG. 6D, the anode connection foil 610 may be protected on the exposed bottom layer by adhering a masking layer 612. The masking layer 612 may be a commercially available PSA transfer tape with a primary liner. Next, at FIG. 6E, the anode connection foil 610 may be electroplated with a coherent metal 614, zinc, for example, which coats the exposed section of the anode connection foil 610 inside of the cathode pocket. Proceeding to 6F, the anode electrical collection masking layer 612 is removed from the bottom of the anode connection foil 610 after electroplating.



FIGS. 7A-7F illustrate an alternate mode of processing the steps illustrated in FIGS. 6A-6F. FIGS. 7A-7B may illustrate similar processes as depicted in FIGS. 6A-6B. The laminar structure may comprise two laminar construct release layers, 702 and 702a, one layer on either end; two laminar construct adhesive layers, 704 and 704a, located between the laminar construct release layers 702 and 702a; and a laminar construct core 706, located between the two laminar construct adhesive layers 704 and 704a. The laminar construct release layers and adhesive layers may be produced or purchased, such as a commercially available pressure-sensitive adhesive transfer tape with primary liner layer. The laminar construct adhesive layers may be a polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) layer which may be approximately 1-3 millimeters in thickness and cap the laminar construct core 706. The laminar construct core 706 may comprise a thermoplastic polymer resin such as polyethylene terephthalate, which, for example, may be approximately 3 millimeters thick. Proceeding to FIG. 7B, a storage means, such as a cavity, for the cathode pocket 708, may be cut in the laminar construct by laser cutting treatment. In FIG. 7C, an anode connection foil 710 may be obtained and a protective masking layer 712 applied to one side. Next, at FIG. 7D, the anode connection foil 710 may be electroplated with a layer 714 of a coherent metal, for example, zinc. Proceeding to FIG. 7E, the laminar constructs of FIGS. 7B and 7D may be combined to form a new laminar construct as depicted in FIG. 7E by adhering the construct of FIG. 7B to the electroplated layer 714 of FIG. 7D. The release layer 702a of FIG. 7B may be removed in order to expose adhesive layer 704a of FIG. 7B for adherence onto electroplated layer 714 of FIG. 7D. Proceeding next to FIG. 7F, the anode protective masking layer 712 may be removed from the bottom of the anode connection foil 710.



FIGS. 8A-8H illustrate exemplary implementations of energization elements to a biocompatible laminar structure, which at times is referred to as a laminar assembly or a laminate assembly herein, similar to, for example, those illustrated in FIGS. 6A-6F and 7A-7F. Proceeding to FIG. 8A, a hydrogel separator precursor mixture 820 may be deposited on the surface of the laminate assembly. In some examples, as depicted, the hydrogel precursor mixture 820 may be applied up a release layer 802. Next, at FIG. 8B, the hydrogel separator precursor mixture 820 may be squeegeed 850 into the cathode pocket while being cleaned off of the release layer 802. The term “squeegeed” may generally refer to the use of a planarizing or scraping tool to rub across the surface and move fluid material over the surface and into cavities as they exist. The process of squeegeeing may be performed by equipment similar to the vernacular “Squeegee” type device or alternatively and planarizing device such as knife edges, razor edges and the like which may be made of numerous materials as may be chemically consistent with the material to be moved.


The processing depicted at FIG. 8B may be performed several times to ensure coating of the cathode pocket, and increment the thickness of resulting features. Next, at FIG. 8C, the hydrogel separator precursor mixture may be allowed to dry in order to evaporate materials, which may typically be solvents or diluents of various types, from the hydrogel separator precursor mixture, and then the dispensed and applied materials may be cured. It may be possible to repeat both of the processes depicted at FIG. 8B and FIG. 8C in combination in some examples. In some examples, the hydrogel separator precursor mixture may be cured by exposure to heat while in other examples the curing may be performed by exposure to photon energy. In still further examples the curing may involve both exposure to photon energy and to heat. There may be numerous manners to cure the hydrogel separator precursor mixture.


The result of curing may be to form the hydrogel separator precursor material to the wall of the cavity as well as the surface region in proximity to an anode or cathode feature which in the present example may be an anode feature. Adherence of the material to the sidewalls of the cavity may be useful in the separation function of a separator. The result of curing may be to form an anhydrous polymerized precursor mixture concentrate 822 which may be simply considered the separator of the cell. Proceeding to FIG. 8D, cathode slurry 830 may be deposited onto the surface of the laminar construct release layer 802. Next, at FIG. 8E the cathode slurry 830 may be squeegeed by device 850 into the cathode pocket and onto the anhydrous polymerized precursor mixture concentrate 822. The cathode slurry may be moved to its desired location in the cavity while simultaneously being cleaned off to a large degree from the laminar construct release layer 802. The process of FIG. 8E may be performed several times to ensure coating of the cathode slurry 830 on top of the anhydrous polymerized precursor mixture concentrate 822. Next, at FIG. 8F, the cathode slurry may be allowed to dry down to form an isolated cathode fill 832 on top of the anhydrous polymerized precursor mixture concentrate 822, filling in the remainder of the cathode pocket.


Proceeding to FIG. 8G, an electrolyte formulation 840 may be added on to the isolated cathode fill 832 and allowed to hydrate the isolated cathode fill 832 and the anhydrous polymerized precursor mixture concentrate 822. Next, at FIG. 8H, a cathode connection foil 816 may be adhered to the remaining laminar construct adhesive layer 804 by removing the remaining laminar construct release layer 802 and pressing the connection foil 816 in place. The resulting placement may result in covering the hydrated cathode fill 842 as well as establishing electrical contact to the cathode fill 842 as a cathode current collector and connection means.



FIGS. 9A through 9C illustrate an alternative example of the resulting laminate assembly from FIG. 7D. In FIG. 9A, the anode connection foil 710 may be obtained and a protective masking layer 712 applied to one side. The anode connection foil 710 may be plated with a layer 714 of coherent metal with, for example, zinc. In similar fashion as described in the previous figures. Proceeding to FIG. 9B, a hydrogel separator 910 may be applied without the use of the squeegee method illustrated in FIG. 8E. The hydrogel separator precursor mixture may be applied in various manners, for example, a preformed film of the mixture may be adhered by physical adherence; alternatively, a diluted mixture of the hydrogel separator precursor mixture may be dispensed and then adjusted to a desired thickness by the processing of spin coating. Alternatively the material may be applied by spray coating, or any other processing equivalent. Next, at FIG. 9C, processing is depicted to create a segment of the hydrogel separator that may function as a containment around a separator region. The processing may create a region that limits the flow, or diffusion, of materials such as electrolyte outside the internal structure of the formed battery elements. Such a blocking feature 920 of various types may therefore be formed. The blocking feature 920, in some examples, may correspond to a highly crosslinked region of the separator layer as may be formed in some examples by increased exposure to photon energy in the desired region of the blocking feature 920. In other examples, materials may be added to the hydrogel separator material before it is cured to create regionally differentiated portions that upon curing become the blocking feature 920. In still further examples, regions of the hydrogel separator material may be removed either before or after curing by various techniques including, for example, chemical etching of the layer with masking to define the regional extent. The region of removed material may create a blocking feature in its own right or alternatively, material may be added back into the void to create a blocking feature. The processing of the impermeable segment may occur through several methods including image out processing, increased crosslinking, heavy photodosing, back-filling, or omission of hydrogel adherence to create a void. In some examples, a laminate construct or assembly of the type depicted as the result of the processing in FIG. 9C may be formed without the blocking feature 920.


Polymerized Battery Element Separators


In some battery designs, the use of a discrete separator (as described in a previous section) may be precluded due to a variety of reasons such as the cost, the availability of materials, the quality of materials, or the complexity of processing for some material options as non-limiting examples. In such cases, a cast or form-in-place separator which is illustrated in the processes of FIGS. 8A-8H, for example, may provide desirable benefits. While starch or pasted separators have been used commercially with success in AA and other Leclanché format or zinc-carbon batteries, such separators may be unsuitable in some ways for use in certain examples of laminar microbatteries. Particular attention may need to be paid to the uniformity and consistency of geometry for any separator used in the batteries of the present invention. Precise control over separator volume may be needed to facilitate precise subsequent incorporation of known cathode volumes and subsequent realization of consistent discharge capacities and cell performance.


A method to achieve a uniform, mechanically robust form-in-place separator may be to use UV-curable hydrogel formulations. Numerous water-permeable hydrogel formulations may be known in various industries, for example, the contact lens industry. An example of a common hydrogel in the contact lens industry may be poly(hydroxyethylmethacrylate) crosslinked gel, or simply pHEMA. For numerous applications of the present invention, pHEMA may possess many attractive properties for use in Leclanché and zinc-carbon batteries. pHEMA typically may maintain a water content of approximately 30-40 percent in the hydrated state while maintaining an elastic modulus of about 100 psi or greater. Furthermore, the modulus and water content properties of crosslinked hydrogels may be adjusted by one of ordinary skill in the art by incorporating additional hydrophilic monomeric (e.g. methacrylic acid) or polymeric (e.g. polyvinylpyrrolidone) components. In this manner, the water content, or more specifically, the ionic permeability of the hydrogel may be adjusted by formulation.


Of particular advantage in some examples, a castable and polymerizable hydrogel formulation may comprise one or more diluents to facilitate processing. The diluent may be chosen to be volatile such that the castable mixture may be squeegeed into a cavity, and then allowed a sufficient drying time to remove the volatile solvent component. After drying, a bulk photopolymerization may be initiated by exposure to actinic radiation of appropriate wavelength, such as blue UV light at 420 nm, for the chosen photoinitiator, such as CGI 819. The volatile diluent may help to provide a desirable application viscosity so as to facilitate casting a uniform layer of polymerizable material in the cavity. The volatile diluent may also provide beneficial surface tension lowering effects, particularly in the case where strongly polar monomers are incorporated in the formulation. Another aspect that may be important to achieve the casting of a uniform layer of polymerizable material in the cavity may be the application viscosity. Common small molar mass reactive monomers typically do not have very high viscosities, which may be typically only a few centipoise. In an effort to provide beneficial viscosity control of the castable and polymerizable separator material, a high molar mass polymeric component known to be compatible with the polymerizable material may be selected for incorporation into the formulation. Examples of high molar mass polymers which may be suitable for incorporation into exemplary formulations may include polyvinylpyrrolidone and polyethylene oxide.


In some examples the castable, polymerizable separator may be advantageously applied into a designed cavity, as previously described. In alternative examples, there may be no cavity at the time of polymerization. Instead, the castable, polymerizable separator formulation may be coated onto an electrode-containing substrate, for example, patterned zinc plated brass, and then subsequently exposed to actinic radiation using a photomask to selectively polymerize the separator material in targeted areas. Unreacted separator material may then be removed by exposure to appropriate rinsing solvents. In these examples, the separator material may be designated as a photo-patternable separator.


Multiple Component Separator Formulations


The separator, useful according to examples of the present invention, may have a number of properties that may be important to its function. In some examples, the separator may desirably be formed in such a manner as to create a physical barrier such that layers on either side of the separator do not physically contact one another. The layer may therefore have an important characteristic of uniform thickness, since while a thin layer may be desirable for numerous reasons, a void or gap free layer may be essential. Additionally, the thin layer may desirably have a high permeability to allow for the free flow of ions. Also, the separator requires optimal water uptake to optimize mechanical properties of the separator. Thus, the formulation may include a crosslinking component, a hydrophilic polymer component, and a solvent component.


A crosslinker may be a monomer with two or more polymerizable double bonds. Suitable crosslinkers may be compounds with two or more polymerizable functional groups. Examples of suitable hydrophilic crosslinkers may also include compounds having two or more polymerizable functional groups, as well as hydrophilic functional groups such as polyether, amide or hydroxyl groups. Specific examples may include TEGDMA (tetraethyleneglycol dimethacrylate), TrEGDMA (triethyleneglycol dimethacrylate), ethyleneglycol dimethacylate (EGDMA), ethylenediamine dimethylacrylamide, glycerol dimethacrylate and/or combinations thereof.


The amounts of crosslinker that may be used in some examples may range, e.g., from about 0.000415 to about 0.0156 mole per 100 grams of reactive components in the reaction mixture. The amount of hydrophilic crosslinker used may generally be about 0 to about 2 weight percent and, for example, from about 0.5 to about 2 weight percent. Hydrophilic polymer components capable of increasing the viscosity of the reactive mixture and/or increasing the degree of hydrogen bonding with the slow-reacting hydrophilic monomer, such as high molecular weight hydrophilic polymers, may be desirable.


The high molecular weight hydrophilic polymers provide improved wettability, and in some examples may improve wettability to the separator of the present invention. In some non-limiting examples, high molecular weight hydrophilic polymers may be hydrogen bond receivers which in aqueous environments, hydrogen bond to water, thus becoming effectively more hydrophilic. The absence of water may facilitate the incorporation of the hydrophilic polymer in the reaction mixture. Aside from the specifically named high molecular weight hydrophilic polymers, it may be expected that any high molecular weight polymer will be useful in the present invention provided that when the polymer is added to an exemplary silicone hydrogel formulation, the hydrophilic polymer (a) does not substantially phase separate from the reaction mixture and (b) imparts wettability to the resulting cured polymer.


In some examples, the high molecular weight hydrophilic polymer may be soluble in the diluent at processing temperatures. Manufacturing processes which use water or water soluble diluents, such as isopropyl alcohol (IPA), may be desirable examples due to their simplicity and reduced cost. In these examples, high molecular weight hydrophilic polymers which are water soluble at processing temperatures may also be desirable examples.


Examples of high molecular weight hydrophilic polymers may include but are not limited to polyamides, polylactones, polyimides, polylactams and functionalized polyamides, polylactones, polyimides, polylactams, such as PVP and copolymers thereof, or alternatively, DMA functionalized by copolymerizing DMA with a lesser molar amount of a hydroxyl-functional monomer such as HEMA, and then reacting the hydroxyl groups of the resulting copolymer with materials containing radical polymerizable groups. High molecular weight hydrophilic polymers may include but are not limited to poly-N-vinyl pyrrolidone, poly-N-vinyl-2-piperidone, poly-N-vinyl-2-caprolactam, poly-N-vinyl-3-methyl-2-caprolactam, poly-N-vinyl-3-methyl-2-piperidone, poly-N-vinyl-4-methyl-2-piperidone, poly-N-vinyl-4-methyl-2-caprolactam, poly-N-vinyl-3-ethyl-2-pyrrolidone, and poly-N-vinyl-4,5-dimethyl-2-pyrrolidone, polyvinylimidazole, poly-N—N-dimethylacrylamide, polyvinyl alcohol, polyacrylic acid, polyethylene oxide, poly 2 ethyl oxazoline, heparin polysaccharides, polysaccharides, mixtures and copolymers (including block or random, branched, multichain, comb-shaped or star-shaped) thereof where poly-N-vinylpyrrolidone (PVP) may be a desirable example where PVP has been added to a hydrogel composition to form an interpenetrating network which shows a low degree of surface friction and a low dehydration rate.


Additional components or additives, which may generally be known in the art, may also be included. Additives may include but are not limited to ultra-violet absorbing compounds, photo-initiators such as CGI 819, reactive tints, antimicrobial compounds, pigments, photochromic, release agents, combinations thereof and the like.


The method associated with these types of separators may also include receiving CGI 819; then mixing with PVP, HEMA, EGDMA and IPA; and then curing the resulting mixture with a heat source or an exposure to photons. In some examples the exposure to photons may occur where the photons' energy is consistent with a wavelength occurring in the ultraviolet portion of the electromagnetic spectrum. Other methods of initiating polymerization generally performed in polymerization reactions are within the scope of the present invention.


Current Collectors and Electrodes


In some examples of zinc carbon and Leclanche cells, the cathode current collector may be a sintered carbon rod. This type of material may face technical hurdles for thin electrochemical cells of the present invention. In some examples, printed carbon inks may be used in thin electrochemical cells to replace a sintered carbon rod for the cathode current collector, and in these examples, the resulting device may be formed without significant impairment to the resulting electrochemical cell. Typically, the carbon inks may be applied directly to packaging materials which may comprise polymer films, or in some cases metal foils. In the examples where the packaging film may be a metal foil, the carbon ink may need to protect the underlying metal foil from chemical degradation and/or corrosion by the electrolyte. Furthermore, in these examples, the carbon ink current collector may need to provide electrical conductivity from the inside of the electrochemical cell to the outside of the electrochemical cell, implying sealing around or through the carbon ink. Due to the porous nature of carbon inks, this may be not easily accomplished without significant challenges. Carbon inks also may be applied in layers that have finite and relatively small thickness, for example, 10 to 20 microns. In a thin electrochemical cell design in which the total internal package thickness may only be about 100 to 150 microns, the thickness of a carbon ink layer may take up a significant fraction of the total internal volume of the electrochemical cell, thereby negatively impacting electrical performance of the cell. Further, the thin nature of the overall battery and the current collector in particular may imply a small cross-sectional area for the current collector. As resistance of a trace increases with trace length, and decreases with cross-sectional area, there may be a direct tradeoff between current collector thickness and resistance. The bulk resistivity of carbon ink may be insufficient to meet the resistance requirement of thin batteries. Inks filled with silver or other conductive metals may also be considered to decrease resistance and/or thickness, but they may introduce new challenges such as incompatibility with novel electrolytes. In consideration of these factors, in some examples it may be desirable to realize efficient and high performance thin electrochemical cells of the present invention by utilizing a thin metal foil as the current collector, or to apply a thin metal film to an underlying polymer packaging layer to act as the current collector. Such metal foils may have significantly lower resistivity, thereby allowing them to meet electrical resistance requirements with much less thickness than printed carbon inks.


In some examples, one or more of the top and/or bottom packaging layers may serve as a substrate for a sputtered current collector metal or metal stack. For example, 3M® Scotchpak 1109 backing may be metallized using physical vapor deposition (PVD) of one or more metallic layers useful as a current collector for a cathode. Exemplary metal stacks useful as cathode current collectors may be Ti—W (titanium-tungsten) adhesion layers and Ti (titanium) conductor layers. Exemplary metal stacks useful as anode current collectors may be Ti—W adhesion layers, Au (gold) conductor layers, and In (indium) deposition layers. The thickness of the PVD layers may be less than 500 nm in total. If multiple layers of metals are used, the electrochemical and barrier properties may need to be compatible with the battery. For example, copper may be electroplated on top of a seed layer to grow a thick layer of conductor. Additional layers may be plated upon the copper. However, copper may be electrochemically incompatible with certain electrolytes especially in the presence of zinc. Accordingly, if copper is used as a layer in the battery, it may need to be sufficiently isolated from the battery electrolyte. Alternatively, copper may be excluded or another metal substituted.


In some other examples, top and/or bottom packaging foils may also function as current collectors. For example, a 25 micron brass foil may be useful as an anode current collector for a zinc anode. The brass foil may be optionally electroplated with indium prior to electroplating with zinc. In one example, cathode current collector packaging foils may comprise titanium foil, Hastelloy C-276 foil, chromium foil, and/or tantalum foil. In certain designs, one or more packaging foils may be fine blanked, embossed, etched, textured, laser machined, or otherwise processed to provide desirable form, surface roughness, and/or geometry to the final cell packaging.


Anode and Anode Corrosion Inhibitors


The anode for the laminar battery of the present invention may, for example, comprise zinc. In traditional zinc carbon batteries, a zinc anode may take the physical form of a can in which the contents of the electrochemical cell may be contained. For the battery of the present invention, a zinc can may be an example but there may be other physical forms of zinc that may provide desirable to realize ultra-small battery designs.


Electroplated zinc may have examples of use in a number of industries, for example, for the protective or aesthetic coating of metal parts. In some examples, electroplated zinc may be used to form thin and conformal anodes useful for batteries of the present invention.


Furthermore, the electroplated zinc may be patterned in seemingly endless configurations, depending on the design intent. A facile means for patterning electroplated zinc may be processing with the use of a photomask or a physical mask. A plating mask may be fabricated by a variety of approaches. One approach may be by using a photomask. In these examples, a photoresist may be applied to a conductive substrate, the substrate on which zinc may subsequently be plated. The desired plating pattern may be then projected to the photoresist by means of a photomask, thereby causing curing of selected areas of photoresist. The uncured photoresist may then be removed with appropriate solvent and cleaning techniques. The result may be a patterned area of conductive material that may receive an electroplated zinc treatment. While this method may provide benefit to the shape or design of the zinc to be plated, the approach may require use of available photopatternable materials, which may have constrained properties to the overall cell package construction. Consequently, new and novel methods for patterning zinc may be required to realize some designs of thin microbatteries of the present invention.


An alternative means of patterning zinc anodes may be by means of a physical mask application. A physical mask may be made by cutting desirable apertures in a film having desirable barrier and/or packaging properties. Additionally, the film may have pressure sensitive adhesive applied to one or both sides. Finally, the film may have protective release liners applied to one or both adhesives. The release liner may serve the dual purpose of protecting the adhesive during aperture cutting and protecting the adhesive during specific processing steps of assembling the electrochemical cell, specifically the cathode filling step, described in following description. In some examples, a zinc mask may comprise a PET film of approximately 100 microns thickness to which a pressure sensitive adhesive may be applied to both sides in a layer thickness of approximately 10-20 microns. Both PSA layers may be covered by a PET release film which may have a low surface energy surface treatment, and may have an approximate thickness of 50 microns. In these examples, the multi-layer zinc mask may comprise PSA and PET film. PET films and PET/PSA zinc mask constructs as described herein may be desirably processed with precision nanosecond laser micromachining equipment, such as, an Oxford Lasers E-Series laser micromachining workstation, to create ultra-precise apertures in the mask to facilitate later plating. In essence, once the zinc mask has been fabricated, one side of the release liner may be removed, and the mask with apertures may be laminated to the anode current collector and/or anode-side packaging film/foil. In this manner, the PSA creates a seal at the inside edges of the apertures, facilitating clean and precise masking of the zinc during electroplating.


The zinc mask may be placed and then electroplating of one or more metallic materials may be performed. In some examples, zinc may be electroplated directly onto an electrochemically compatible anode current collector foil such as brass. In alternate design examples where the anode side packaging comprises a polymer film or multi-layer polymer film upon which seed metallization has been applied, zinc, and/or the plating solutions used for depositing zinc, may not be chemically compatible with the underlying seed metallization. Manifestations of lack of compatibility may include film cracking, corrosion, and/or exacerbated H2 evolution upon contact with cell electrolyte. In such a case, additional metals may be applied to the seed metal to affect better overall chemical compatibility in the system. One metal that may find particular utility in electrochemical cell constructions may be indium. Indium may be widely used as an alloying agent in battery grade zinc with its primary function being to provide an anti-corrosion property to the zinc in the presence of electrolyte. In some examples, indium may be successfully deposited on various seed metallizations such as Ti—W and Au. Resulting films of 1-3 microns of indium on the seed metallization layers may be low-stress and adherent. In this manner, the anode-side packaging film and attached current collector having an indium top layer may be conformable and durable. In some examples, it may be possible to deposit zinc on an indium-treated surface, the resulting deposit may be very non-uniform and nodular. This effect may occur at lower current density settings, for example, 20 ASF. As viewed under a microscope, nodules of zinc may be observed to form on the underlying smooth indium deposit. In certain electrochemical cell designs, the vertical space allowance for the zinc anode layer may be up to about 5-10 microns maximum, but in some examples, lower current densities may be used for zinc plating, and the resulting nodular growths may grow taller than the maximum anode vertical allowance. It may be that the nodular zinc growth stems from a combination of the high overpotential of indium and the presence of an oxide layer of indium.


In some examples, higher current density DC plating may overcome the relatively large nodular growth patterns of zinc on indium surfaces. For example, 100 ASF plating conditions may result in nodular zinc, but the size of the zinc nodules may be drastically reduced compared to 20 ASF plating conditions. Furthermore, the number of nodules may be vastly greater under 100 ASF plating conditions. The resulting zinc film may ultimately coalesce to a more or less uniform layer with only some residual feature of nodular growth while meeting the vertical space allowance of about 5-10 microns.


An added benefit of indium in the electrochemical cell may be reduction of H2 formation, which may be a slow process that occurs in aqueous electrochemical cells containing zinc. The indium may be beneficially applied to one or more of the anode current collector, the anode itself as a co-plated alloying component, or as a surface coating on the electroplated zinc. For the latter case, indium surface coatings may be desirably applied in-situ by way of an electrolyte additive such as indium trichloride, indium sulfate or indium acetate. When such additives may be added to the electrolyte in small concentrations, indium may spontaneously plate on exposed zinc surfaces as well as portions of exposed anode current collector.


Zinc and similar anodes commonly used in commercial primary batteries is typically found in sheet, rod, and paste forms. The anode of a miniature, biocompatible battery may be of similar form, e.g. thin foil, or may be plated as previously mentioned. The properties of this anode may differ significantly from those in existing batteries, for example, because of differences in contaminants or surface finish attributed to machining and plating processes. Accordingly, the electrodes and electrolyte may require special engineering to meet capacity, impedance, and shelf life requirements. For example, special plating process parameters, plating bath composition, surface treatment, and electrolyte composition may be needed to optimize electrode performance.


Cathode Mixture


There are numerous cathode chemistry mixtures that may be consistent with the concepts of the present invention. In some examples, a cathode mixture, which may be a term for a chemical formulation used to form a battery's cathode, may be applied as a paste, gel, suspension, or slurry, and may comprise a transition metal oxide such as manganese dioxide, some form of conductive additive which, for example, may be a form of conductive powder such as carbon black or graphite, and a water-soluble polymer such as polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) or some other binder additive. In some examples, other components may be included such as one or more of binders, electrolyte salts, corrosion inhibitors, water or other solvents, surfactants, rheology modifiers, and other conductive additives, such as, conductive polymers. Once formulated and appropriately mixed, the cathode mixture may have a desirable rheology that allows it to either be dispensed onto desired portions of the separator and/or cathode current collector, or squeegeed through a screen or stencil in a similar manner. In some examples, the cathode mixture may be dried before being used in later cell assembly steps, while in other examples, the cathode may contain some or all of the electrolyte components, and may only be partially dried to a selected moisture content.


The transition metal oxide may, for example, be manganese dioxide. The manganese dioxide which may be used in the cathode mixture may be, for example, electrolytic manganese dioxide (EMD) due to the beneficial additional specific energy that this type of manganese dioxide provides relative to other forms, such as natural manganese dioxide (NMD) or chemical manganese dioxide (CMD). Furthermore, the EMD useful in batteries of the present invention may need to have a particle size and particle size distribution that may be conducive to the formation of depositable or printable cathode mixture pastes/slurries. Specifically, the EMD may be processed to remove significant large particulate components that may be considered large relative to other features such as battery internal dimensions, separator thicknesses, dispense tip diameters, stencil opening sizes, or screen mesh sizes. Particle size optimization may also be used to improve performance of the battery, for example, internal impedance and discharge capacity.


Milling is the reduction of solid materials from one average particle size to a smaller average particle size, by crushing, grinding, cutting, vibrating, or other processes. Milling may also be used to free useful materials from matrix materials in which they may be embedded, and to concentrate minerals. A mill is a device that breaks solid materials into smaller pieces by grinding, crushing, or cutting. There may be several means for milling and many types of materials processed in them. Such means of milling may include: ball mill, bead mill, mortar and pestle, roller press, and jet mill among other milling alternatives. One example of milling that may be utilized in the present invention is jet milling. After the milling, the state of the solid is changed, for example, the particle size, the particle size disposition and the particle shape. Aggregate milling processes may also be used to remove or separate contamination or moisture from aggregate to produce “dry fills” prior to transport or structural filling. Some equipment may combine various techniques to sort a solid material into a mixture of particles whose size is bounded by both a minimum and maximum particle size. Such processing may be referred to as “classifiers” or “classification.”


Milling may be one aspect of cathode mixture production for uniform particle size distribution of the cathode mixture ingredients. Uniform particle size in a cathode mixture may assist in viscosity, rheology, electroconductivity, and other properties of a cathode. Milling may assist these properties by controlling agglomeration, or a mass collection, of the cathode mixture ingredients. Agglomeration—the clustering of disparate elements, which in the case of the cathode mixture, may be carbon allotropes and transition metal oxides—may negatively affect the filling process by leaving voids in the desired cathode cavity as illustrated in FIG. 11 and described subsequently.


Also, filtration may be another important step for the removal of agglomerated or unwanted particles. Unwanted particles may include over-sized particles, contaminates, or other particles not explicitly accounted for in the preparation process. Filtration may be accomplished by means such as filter-paper filtration, vacuum filtration, chromatography, microfiltration, and other means of filtration.


In some examples, EMD may have an average particle size of 7 microns with a large particle content that may contain particulates up to about 70 microns. In alternative examples, the EMD may be sieved, further milled, or otherwise separated or processed to limit large particulate content to below a certain threshold, for example, 25 microns or smaller.


The cathode may also comprise silver dioxide or nickel oxyhydroxide. Such materials may offer increased capacity and less decrease in loaded voltage during discharge relative to manganese dioxide, both desirable properties in a battery. Batteries based on these cathodes may have current examples present in industry and literature. A novel microbattery utilizing a silver dioxide cathode may include a biocompatible electrolyte, for example, one comprising zinc chloride and/or ammonium chloride instead of potassium hydroxide.


Some examples of the cathode mixture may include a polymeric binder. The binder may serve a number of functions in the cathode mixture. The primary function of the binder may be to create a sufficient inter-particle electrical network between EMD particles and carbon particles. A secondary function of the binder may be to facilitate mechanical adhesion and electrical contact to the cathode current collector. A third function of the binder may be to influence the rheological properties of the cathode mixture for advantageous dispensing and/or stenciling/screening. Still, a fourth function of the binder may be to enhance the electrolyte uptake and distribution within the cathode.


The choice of the binder polymer as well as the amount to be used may be beneficial to the function of the cathode in the electrochemical cell of the present invention. If the binder polymer is too soluble in the electrolyte to be used, then the primary function of the binder—electrical continuity—may be drastically impacted to the point of cell non-functionality. On the contrary, if the binder polymer is insoluble in the electrolyte to be used, portions of EMD may be ionically insulated from the electrolyte, resulting in diminished cell performance such as reduced capacity, lower open circuit voltage, and/or increased internal resistance.


The binder may be hydrophobic; it may also be hydrophilic. Examples of binder polymers useful for the present invention comprise PVP, polyisobutylene (PIB), rubbery triblock copolymers comprising styrene end blocks such as those manufactured by Kraton Polymers, styrene-butadiene latex block copolymers, polyacrylic acid, hydroxyethylcellulose, carboxymethylcellulose, fluorocarbon solids such as polytetrafluoroethylene, among others.


A solvent may be one component of the cathode mixture. A solvent may be useful in wetting the cathode mixture, which may assist in the particle distribution of the mixture. One example of a solvent may be toluene. Also, a surfactant may be useful in wetting, and thus distribution, of the cathode mixture. One example of a surfactant may be a detergent, such as Triton™ QS-44. Triton™ QS-44 may assist in the dissociation of aggregated ingredients in the cathode mixture, allowing for a more uniform distribution of the cathode mixture ingredients.


A conductive carbon may typically be used in the production of a cathode. Carbon is capable of forming many allotropes, or different structural modifications. Different carbon allotropes have different physical properties allowing for variation in electroconductivity. For example, the “springiness” of carbon black may help with adherence of a cathode mixture to a current collector. However, in energization elements requiring relatively low amounts of energy, these variations in electroconductivity may be less important than other favorable properties such as density, particle size, heat conductivity, and relative uniformity, among other properties. Examples of carbon allotropes include: diamond, graphite, graphene, amorphous carbon (informally called carbon black), buckminsterfullerenes, glassy carbon (also called vitreous carbon), carbon aerogels, and other possible forms of carbon capable of conducting electricity. One example of a carbon allotrope may be graphite.


One example of a completed cathode mixture formulation may be given in Table 1 below:











TABLE 1






Formulation Example
Relative weight








80:20 JMEMD/KS6
4.900



PIB B10 (from 20% solution)
0.100



toluene
2.980



Total
7.980










where PIB is polyisobutylene, JMEMD is jet milled manganese dioxide, KS6 is a graphite produced by Timcal, and PIB B10 is polyisobutylene with a molecular weight grade of B10.


Once the cathode mixture has been formulated and processed, the mixture may be dispensed, applied, and/or stored onto a surface such as the hydrogel separator, or the cathode current collector, or into a volume such as the cavity in the laminar structure. Filing onto a surface may result in a volume being filled over time. In order to apply, dispense, and/or store the mixture, a certain rheology may be desired to optimize the dispensing, applying, and/or storing process. For example, a less viscous rheology may allow for better filling of the cavity while at the same time possibly sacrificing particle distribution. A more viscous rheology may allow for optimized particle distribution, while possibly decreasing the ability to fill the cavity and possibly losing electroconductivity.


For example, FIGS. 10A-10F illustrate optimized and non-optimized dispensing or application into a cavity. FIG. 10A illustrates a cavity optimally filled with the cathode mixture after application, dispensing, and/or storing. FIG. 10B illustrates a cavity with insufficient filling in the bottom left quadrant 1002, which may be a direct result of undesirable cathode mixture rheology. FIG. 10C illustrates a cavity with insufficient filling in the top right quadrant 1004, which may be a direct result of undesirable cathode mixture rheology. FIGS. 10D and 10E illustrate a cavity with insufficient filling in the middle 1006 or bottom 1008 of the cavity, which may be a bubble caused by a direct result of undesirable cathode mixture rheology. FIG. 10F illustrates a cavity with insufficient filling towards the top 1010 of the cavity, which may be a direct result of undesirable cathode mixture rheology. The defects illustrated in FIGS. 10B-10F may result in several battery issues, for example, reduced capacity, increased internal resistance, and degraded reliability.


Further, in FIG. 11, agglomeration 1102 may occur as a result of undesirable cathode mixture rheology. Agglomeration may result in decreased performance of the cathode mixture, for example, decreased discharge capacity and increased internal resistance.


In one example, the cathode mixture may resemble a peanut-butter like consistency optimized for squeegee filling the laminar construct cavity while maintaining electroconductivity. In another example, the mixture may be viscous enough to be printed into the cavity. While in yet another example, the cathode mixture may be dried, placed, and stored in the cavity.


Electrolyte


An electrolyte is a component of a battery which facilitates a chemical reaction to take place between the chemical materials of the electrodes. Typical electrolytes may be electrochemically active to the electrodes, for example, allowing oxidation and reduction reactions to occur. As used herein, an electrolyte may be a solution comprising a suitable solvent and ionic species. The solution may be suitable in that the solution may support the presence of these ionic species. An ionizing solute may be a material that when added to the solvent dissolves into solvated ionic species. In some examples, the ionizing solute may be an ionizing salt. The electrolyte solutions that contain ionic species may have an ability to support electrical conductivity by the diffusion of the ionic species in the solution.


In some examples, this important electrochemical activity may make for a challenge to creating devices that are biocompatible. For example, potassium hydroxide (KOH) is a commonly used electrolyte in alkaline cells. At high concentration the material has a high pH and may interact unfavorably with various living tissues. On the other hand, in some examples, electrolytes may be employed which may be less electrochemically active; however, these materials may typically result in reduced electrical performance, such as reduced cell voltage and increased cell resistance. Accordingly, one key aspect of the design and engineering of a biomedical microbattery may be the electrolyte. It may be desirable for the electrolyte to be sufficiently active to meet electrical requirements while also being relatively safe for use in- or on-body.


Various test scenarios may be used to determine the safety profile of battery components, such as electrolytes, to living cells. These results, in conjunction with tests of the battery packaging, may allow engineering design of a battery system that may meet requirements. For example, when developing a powered contact lens, battery electrolytes may be tested on a human corneal cell model. These tests may include experiments on electrolyte concentration, exposure time, and additives. The results of such tests may indicate cell metabolism and other physiological aspects.


Electrolytes for use in the present invention may include zinc chloride, zinc acetate, zinc sulfate, zinc bromide, zinc gluconate hydrate, zinc nitrate, and zinc iodide, ammonium acetate, and ammonium chloride in mass concentrations from approximately 0.1 percent to 50 percent, and in a non-limiting example may be approximately 25 percent. The specific concentrations may depend on solubility, electrochemical activity, battery performance, shelf life, seal integrity, and biocompatibility amongst other dependencies. In some examples, several classes of additives may be utilized in the composition of a battery system. Additives may be mixed into the base electrolyte formulation to alter its characteristics. For example, gelling agents such as agar may reduce the ability of the electrolyte to leak out of packing, thereby increasing safety. Other examples may include carboxymethyl cellulose or cellulose gum. Other examples may include hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose. Corrosion inhibitors such as indium acetate may be added to the electrolyte, for example, to improve shelf life by reducing the undesired dissolution of electrode material such as the zinc anode into the electrolyte. These inhibitors may positively or adversely affect the safety profile of the battery. Wetting agents or surfactants may be added, for example, to allow the electrolyte to wet the separator or to be filled into the battery package. Again, these wetting agents may be positive or negative for safety. The addition of surfactant to the electrolyte may increase the electrical impedance of the cell. Accordingly, the lowest concentration of surfactant to achieve the desired wetting or other properties may be desired. Exemplary surfactants may include Triton™ X-100, Triton™ QS44, and Dowfax™ 3B2 in concentrations from 0.01 percent to 2 percent. One exemplary electrolyte formulation may comprise approximately 10 to 20 percent ZnCl2, approximately 250 to 500 ppm Triton™ QS44, approximately 100 to 200 ppm indium +3 ion supplied as indium acetate, and the balance comprising water.


Novel electrolytes are also emerging which may dramatically improve the safety profile of biomedical microbatteries. For example, a class of solid electrolytes may be inherently resistant to leaking while still offering suitable electrical performance. A gelled or hydro-gelled electrolyte may also provide adequate electrical performance while maintaining resilience to leaking and thus preserving biocompatibility. A gelled electrolyte may also replace the need of a battery separator where the gelled electrolyte's permeability properties may also function to prevent an electrical short between the electrodes. For example, flexible asymmetric supercapacitors using ultrathin two-dimensional MnO2 nano-sheets and graphene in aqueous Ca(NO3)2—SiO2 gel electrolyte have realized excellent electrochemical performance (such as energy density up to 97.2 Wh kg−1, much higher than traditional MnO2 based supercapacitors and no more than 3% capacitance loss even after 10,000 cycles) while maintaining biocompatibility.


These types of gelled electrolytes may be formulated by, for example, creating an aqueous solution of 2 molar calcium nitrate (Ca(NO3)2) in deionized water, adding 1 percent weight by weight carboxymethylcellulose (CMC), adding 10 percent weight by weight silicon dioxide (SiO2), mixing to homogeny, then letting sit until gelled.



FIGS. 12A-F illustrate the exemplary use of a gelled electrolyte in a biocompatible energization element. In FIG. 12A, a pick and place tool 1221 may be used to pick and place a cut or pre-formed piece of a gelled electrolyte into a desired locations on the energization element. At FIG. 12B, the placed gelled electrolyte piece 1222 may be fastened into place and then the PVDF release layer 1223 may be removed. Proceeding to FIG. 12C, the growing device structure may be bonded to a film of the anode 1225. The anode 1225 may comprise an anode collector film upon which a zinc anode film has been electrodeposited.


Proceeding to FIG. 12D, a cathode slurry 1230 may be placed into the formed gap. A squeegee 1231 may be used in some examples to spread the cathode mix across a work piece and in the process fill the gaps of the battery devices being formed. After filling, the remaining PVDF release layer 1232 may be removed which may result in the structure illustrated in FIG. 12E. At FIG. 12F the entire structure may be subjected to a drying process which may shrink the cathode slurry 1240 to also be at the height of the PET layer top. There may be numerous alterations, deletions, changes to materials and thickness targets that may be useful within the intent of the present invention.


Reserve Cells


Reserve cells are batteries in which the active materials, the electrodes and electrolyte, are separated until the time of use. Because of this separation, the cells' self-discharge is greatly reduced and shelf life is greatly increased. As an example batteries using “salt water” electrolyte are commonly used in reserve cells for marine use. Torpedoes, buoys, and emergency lights may use such batteries. Salt water batteries may be designed from a variety of electrode materials, including zinc, magnesium, aluminum, copper, tin, manganese dioxide, and silver oxide. The electrolyte may be actual sea water, for example, water from the ocean flooding the battery upon contact, or may be a specially engineered saline formulation.


In other examples, a reserve cell may be formulated from any of the electrolyte formulations as have been discussed herein, wherein the electrolyte is segregated from the battery cell by a storage means. In some examples, a physical action such as applying force upon the storage means may rupture the storage device in a planned manner such that the electrolyte flows into the battery cell and activates the potential for the chemicals of the electrodes to be turned into electrical energy. In some other examples, a seal of the storage means may be electrically activated. For example, the application of an electric potential on a thin metal seal may melt the seal allowing electrolyte to escape the storage means. In still further examples, an electrically activated pore may be utilized to allow the electrolyte to be released from its storage means. For these examples, there typically may be a source of electricity to activate the flow of electrolyte into the primary battery. An inductive energy source or a photoactive energy (i.e. photocell) source may allow for a controlled signal to provide electrical energy to release electrolyte.


A second reserve cell may also be ideal for this purpose of activating flow of electrolyte into a primary battery on receipt of a signal. The second reserve cell may be a smaller cell that allows for fluid from its surroundings to diffuse into the cell. After the second reserve cell battery device is formed without electrolyte the shelf life may be extended. After the battery device is formed into a biomedical device such as a contact lens it may then be stored in a saline solution. This saline solution may diffuse into the battery thus activating the second reserve cell. A subsequent activation signal, such as the presence of light after a package containing the contact lens is opened may activate the main (reserve) sell to allow electrolyte to flow into the battery device and activate the battery.


A saline electrolyte may have superior biocompatibility as compared to classical electrolytes such as potassium hydroxide and zinc chloride. Contact lenses are stored in a “packing solution” which is typically a mixture of sodium chloride, perhaps with other salts and buffering agents such as sodium borate, boric acid, citric acid, citrates, bicarbonates, TRIS (2-amino-2-hydroxymethyl-1,3-propanediol), Bis-Tris(Bis-(2-hydroxyethyl)-imino-tris-(hydroxymethyl)-methane), bis-aminopolyols, triethanolamine, ACES (N-(2-hydroxyethyl)-2-aminoethanesulfonic acid), BES (N,N-Bis(2-hydroxyethyl)-2-aminoethanesulfonic acid), HEPES (4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid), MES (2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid), MOPS (3[N-morpholino]-propanesulfonic acid), PIPES (piperazine-N,N′-bis(2-ethanesulfonic acid), TES (N-[Tris(hydroxymethyl)methyl]-2-aminoethanesulfonic acid), salts thereof, phosphate buffers, e.g. Na2HPO4, NaH2PO4, and KH2PO4 or mixtures thereof. A formulation of packing solution has been demonstrated as a battery electrolyte in combination with a zinc anode and manganese dioxide cathode. Other electrolyte and electrode combinations are possible.


A contact lens using a “salt water” battery may comprise an electrolyte based on sodium chloride, packing solution, or even a specially engineered electrolyte similar to tear fluid. In some examples, exposure to human tears could enable operation of the battery device.


In addition to, or instead of, possible benefits for biocompatibility by using an electrolyte more similar to tears, or actually using tears, a reserve cell may be used to meet the shelf life requirements of a contact lens product. Typical contact lenses are specified for storage of 3 years or more. This may be a challenging requirement for a battery with a small and thin package. A reserve cell for use in a contact lens may have a design similar to those shown in FIGS. 1 and 3, but the electrolyte might not be added at the time of manufacture. As mentioned previously, the electrolyte may be stored in an ampule within the contact lens and connected to the empty battery cell. One of the cavities of a laminar battery construct may also function to store electrolyte in a segregated fashion from the electrodes. In other examples, saline solution surrounding the contact lens, and therefore the battery, may be used as the electrolyte. Within the contact lens and battery package, a valve or port may be designed to keep electrolyte separated from the electrodes until the user activates the lens. Upon activation, perhaps by simply pinching the edge of the contact lens (similar to activating a glow stick), the electrolyte may be allowed to flow into the battery and form an ionic pathway between the electrodes. This may involve a one-time transfer of electrolyte or may expose the battery for continued diffusion.


Some battery systems may use or consume electrolyte during the chemical reaction. Accordingly, it may be necessary to engineer a certain volume of electrolyte into the packaged system. This electrolyte may be stored in various locations including the separator or a reservoir.


In some examples, a design of a battery system may include a component or components that may function to limit discharge capacity of the battery system. For example, it may be desirable to design the materials and amounts of materials of the anode, cathode, or electrolyte such that one of them may be depleted first during the course of reactions in the battery system. In such an example, the depletion of one of the anode, cathode, or electrolyte may reduce the potential for problematic discharge and side reactions to not take place at lower discharge voltages. These problematic reactions may produce, for example, excessive gas or byproducts which could be detrimental to safety and other factors.


Battery Architecture and Fabrication


Battery architecture and fabrication technology may be closely intertwined. As has been discussed in earlier sections of the present invention, a battery has the following elements: cathode, anode, separator, electrolyte, cathode current collector, anode current collector, and packaging. Clever design may try to combine these elements in easy to fabricate subassemblies. In other examples, optimized design may have dual-use components, such as, using a metal package to double as a current collector. From a relative volume and thickness standpoint, these elements may be nearly all the same volume, except for the cathode. In some examples, the electrochemical system may require about two (2) to ten (10) times the volume of cathode as anode due to significant differences in mechanical density, energy density, discharge efficiency, material purity, and the presence of binders, fillers, and conductive agents. In these examples, the relative scale of the various components may be approximated in the following thicknesses of the elements: Anode current collector=1 μm; Cathode current collector=1 μm; Electrolyte=interstitial liquid (effectively 0 μm); Separator=as thin or thick as desired where the planned maximal thickness may be approximately 15 μm; Anode=5 μm; and the Cathode=50 μm. For these examples of elements the packaging needed to provide sufficient protection to maintain battery chemistry in use environments may have a planned maximal thickness of approximately 50 μm.


In some examples, which may be fundamentally different from large, prismatic constructs such as cylindrical or rectangular forms, and which may be different than wafer-based solid state construct, a construct may assume a pouch-like arrangement, using webs or sheets fabricated into various configurations with battery elements arranged inside. The containment may have two films, or one film folded over onto the other side, either configuration of which may form two roughly planar surfaces which may then be sealed on the perimeter to form a container. This thin-but-wide form factor may make battery elements themselves thin and wide. Furthermore, these examples may be suitable for application through coating, gravure printing, screen printing, sputtering, or other similar fabrication technology.


There may be numerous arrangements of the internal components, such as the anode, separator and cathode, in these pouch-like battery examples with thin-but-wide form factors. Within the enclosed region formed by the two films, these basic elements may be either co-planar, that is side-by-side on the same plane, or co-facial, which may be face-to-face on opposite planes. In the co-planar arrangement, the anode, separator, and cathode may be deposited on the same surface. For the co-facial arrangement, the anode may be deposited on surface-1, the cathode may be deposited on surface-2, and the separator may be placed between the two, either deposited on one of the sides, or inserted as its own separate element.


Another type of example may be classified as laminate assembly, which may involve using films, either in a web or sheet form, to build up a battery layer by layer. Sheets may be bonded to each other using adhesives, such as pressure-sensitive adhesives, thermally activated adhesives, or chemical reaction-based adhesives. In some examples, the sheets may be bonded by welding techniques such as thermal welding, ultrasonic welding and the like. Sheets may lend themselves to standard industry practices as roll-to-roll (R2R), or sheet-to-sheet assembly. As indicted earlier, an interior volume for cathode may need to be substantially larger than the other active elements in the battery. Much of a battery construct may have to create the space of this cathode material, and support it from migration during flexing of the battery. Another portion of the battery construct that may consume significant portions of the thickness budget may be the separator material. In some examples, a sheet form of separator may create an advantageous solution for laminate processing. In other examples, the separator may be formed by dispensing hydrogel material into a layer to act as the separator.


In these laminate battery assembly examples, the forming product may have an anode sheet, which may be a combination of a package layer and an anode current collector, as well as substrate for the anode layer. The forming product may also have an optional separator spacer sheet, a cathode spacer sheet, and a cathode sheet. The cathode sheet may be a combination of a package layer and a cathode current collector layer.


Intimate contact between electrodes and current collectors is of critical importance for reducing impedance and increasing discharge capacity. If portions of the electrode are not in contact with the current collector, resistance may increase since conductivity is then through the electrode (typically less conductive than the current collector) or a portion of the electrode may become totally disconnected. In coin cell and cylindrical batteries, intimacy is realized with mechanical force to crimp the can, pack paste into a can, or through similar means. Wave washers or similar springs are used in commercial cells to maintain force within the battery; however, these may add to the overall thickness of a miniature battery. In typical patch batteries, a separator may be saturated in electrolyte, placed across the electrodes, and pressed down by the external packaging.


In a laminar cofacial battery, several methods to increase electrode intimacy exist. The anode may be plated directly onto the current collector rather than using a paste. This process inherently results in a high level of intimacy and conductivity. The cathode, however, is typically a paste. Although binder material present in the cathode paste may provide adhesion and cohesion, mechanical pressure may be needed to ensure the cathode paste remains in contact with the cathode current collector. This may be especially important as the package is flexed and the battery ages and discharges, for example, as moisture leaves the package through thin and small seals. Compression of the cathode may be achieved in the laminar, cofacial battery by introducing a compliant separator and/or electrolyte between the anode and cathode. A gel electrolyte or hydrogel separator, for example, may compress on assembly and not simply run out of the battery as a liquid electrolyte might. Once the battery is sealed, the electrolyte and/or separator may then push back against the cathode. An embossing step may be performed after assembly of the laminar stack, introducing compression into the stack.


Battery Element Sealing and Encapsulation


In some examples of battery elements for use in biomedical devices, the chemical action of the battery involves aqueous chemistry, where water or moisture is an important constituent to control. Therefore it may be important to incorporate sealing mechanisms that retard or prevent the movement of moisture either out of or into the battery body. Moisture barriers may be designed to keep the internal moisture level at a designed level, within some tolerance. In some examples, a moisture barrier may be divided into two sections or components; namely, the package and the seal.


The package may refer to the main material of the enclosure. In some examples, the package may comprise a bulk material. The Water Vapor Transmission Rate (WVTR) may be an indicator of performance, with ISO, ASTM standards controlling the test procedure, including the environmental conditions operant during the testing. Ideally, the WVTR for a good battery package may be “zero.” Exemplary materials with a near-zero WVTR may be glass and metal foils. Plastics, on the other hand, may be inherently porous to moisture, and may vary significantly for different types of plastic. Engineered materials, laminates, or co-extrudes may be hybrids of the common package materials.


The seal may be the interface between two of the package surfaces. The connecting of seal surfaces finishes the enclosure along with the package. In many examples, the nature of seal designs may make them difficult to characterize for the seal's WVTR due to difficulty in performing measurements using an ISO or ASTM standard, as the sample size or surface area may not be compatible with those procedures. In some examples, a practical manner to testing seal integrity may be a functional test of the actual seal design, for some defined conditions. Seal performance may be a function of the seal material, the seal thickness, the seal length, the seal width, the sealing process, and the seal adhesion or intimacy to package substrates.


In some examples, the plurality of components comprising the laminar microbatteries of the present invention may be held together with a pressure-sensitive adhesive (PSA) that also serves as a sealant. While a myriad of commercially available pressure-sensitive adhesive formulations may exist, such formulations almost always include components that may make them unsuitable for use within a biocompatible laminar microbattery. Examples of undesirable components in pressure-sensitive adhesives may include low molecular mass leachable components, antioxidants e.g. BHT and/or MEHQ, plasticizing oils, impurities, oxidatively unstable moieties containing, for example, unsaturated chemical bonds, residual solvents and/or monomers, polymerization initiator fragments, polar tackifiers, and the like.


Suitable PSAs may on the other hand exhibit the following properties. They may be able to be applied to laminar components to achieve thin layers on the order of 2 to 20 microns. As well, they may comprise a minimum of, for example, zero undesirable or non-biocompatible components. Additionally, they may have sufficient adhesive and cohesive properties so as to bind the components of the laminar battery together. And, they may be able to flow into the micron-scale features inherent in devices of the present construction while providing for a robust sealing of electrolyte within the battery. In some examples of suitable PSAs, the PSAs may have a low permeability to water vapor in order to maintain a desirable aqueous electrolyte composition within the battery even when the battery may be subjected to extremes in humidity for extended periods of time. The PSAs may have good chemical resistance to components of electrolytes such as acids, surfactants, and salts. They may be inert to the effects of water immersion. Suitable PSAs may have a low permeability to oxygen to minimize the rate of direct oxidation, which may be a form of self-discharge, of zinc anodes. And, they may facilitate a finite permeability to hydrogen gas, which may be slowly evolved from zinc anodes in aqueous electrolytes. This property of finite permeability to hydrogen gas may avoid a build-up of internal pressure.



FIGS. 13A-13C illustrate exemplary designs for sealing and encapsulating a biocompatible energization element. Elements of FIGS. 13A-13C may be consistent with the elements of previous illustrations. Beginning with FIG. 13A, a top-down view of an exemplary biocompatible energization element with encapsulation is illustrated. An envelope capable of sealing 1301 may encapsulate the energization element containing at least an anode current collector 1302 with anode, a cathode current collector 1304 with cathode, and internal adhesives/sealants 1308. The envelope capable of sealing 1301 may comprise polymer films capable of sealing such as polypropylene. The internal adhesives/sealants 1308 may comprise pressure sensitive adhesives such as polyisobutylene.


Polyisobutylene (PIB) is a commercially-available material that may be formulated into PSA compositions meeting many if not all desirable requirements. Furthermore, PIB may be an excellent barrier sealant with very low water absorbance and low oxygen permeability. An example of PIB useful in the examples of the present invention may be Oppanol® B15 by BASF Corporation. Oppanol® B15 may be dissolved in hydrocarbon solvents such as toluene, heptane, dodecane, mineral spirits, and the like. One exemplary PSA composition may include 30 percent Oppanol® B15 (w/w) in a solvent mixture, including 70 percent (w/w) toluene and 30 percent dodecane. The adhesive and rheological properties of PIB-based PSA's may be determined in some examples by the blending of different molecular mass grades of PIB. A common approach may be to use a majority of low molar mass PIB, e.g. Oppanol® B10 to effect wetting, tack, and adhesion, and to use a minority of high molar mass PIB to effect toughness and resistance to flow. Consequently, blends of any number of PIB molar mass grades may be envisioned and may be practiced within the scope of the present invention. Furthermore, tackifiers may be added to the PSA formulation so long as the aforementioned requirements may be met. By their very nature, tackifiers impart polar properties to PSA formulations, so they may need to be used with caution so as to not adversely affect the barrier properties of the PSA. Furthermore, tackifiers may in some cases be oxidatively unstable and may include an antioxidant, which could leach out of the PSA. For these reasons, exemplary tackifiers for use in PSA's for biocompatible laminar microbatteries may include fully or mostly hydrogenated hydrocarbon resin tackifiers such as the Regalrez series of tackifiers from Eastman Chemical Corporation.


Next, FIG. 13B illustrates an exemplary bottom-up view of a biocompatible energization element with encapsulation. FIG. 13B illustrates the capability of the plastic envelope capable of sealing 1301, to be sealed at different exemplary sealing sites 1306. In some examples, seals may be formed by a welding process that may involve thermal, laser, solvent, friction, ultrasonic, or arc processing. In other examples, seals may be formed through the use of adhesive sealants such as glues, epoxies, acrylics, natural rubber, and synthetic rubber. Other examples may derive from the utilization of gasket type material that may be formed from cork, natural and synthetic rubber, polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), polypropylene, and silicones to mention a few non-limiting examples.



FIG. 13C illustrates an exemplary long-edge view of a biocompatible energization element with encapsulation containing an anode current collector 1302 with anode, a cathode current collector 1304 with cathode blend 1312, a separator 1310 placed on a separator shelf 1311, adhesive/sealant 1308, and multiple exemplary sealing sites 1306. After treating the envelope capable of sealing 1301 with, for example heat treatment, the envelope may enclose the components of the biocompatible energization element from the top and the bottom; however, the ends containing the anode current collector 1302 and cathode current collector 1304 may still be susceptible to leak. Thus, the addition of sealing sites 1306 may become necessary. The current collector sealing sites may be sealed by several sealing methods including, for example, the use welding, adhesives, lacquer, epoxy, asphalt, or heat treating the PSAs.


In some examples, the energization elements according to the present invention may be designed to have a specified operating life. The operating life may be estimated by determining a practical amount of moisture permeability that may be obtained using a particular battery system and then estimating when such a moisture leakage may result in an end of life condition for the battery. For example, if a battery is stored in a wet environment, then the partial pressure difference between inside and outside the battery may be minimal, resulting in a reduced moisture loss rate, and therefore the battery life may be extended. The same exemplary battery stored in a particularly dry and hot environment may have a significantly reduced expectable lifetime due to the strong driving function for moisture loss.


Methods of Sealing and Encapsulation for Biocompatible Energization Elements



FIGS. 14A-14I illustrate exemplary method steps for sealing and encapsulating a biocompatible energization element. The method steps of FIG. 14A-14I may be performed by stacking layers of material upon one another, building a laminar structure, as described and illustrated herein. Beginning with FIG. 14A, a first polymer film capable of sealing 1401, such as polypropylene may be obtained. Next, at FIG. 14B, a cathode current collector 1404 may be placed on top of the polymer film capable of sealing 1401. The cathode current collector 1404 may be lined on an outer edge by adhesive/sealant 1408 which may be useful for adhering the layers together. At FIG. 14C, a cathode blend 1412 may be deposited upon the cathode current collector 1404. The cathode blend 1412 may be formulated in such a manner to include adhesive and cohesive properties in order to adhere to itself and to its neighboring layers. At 14D, a separator shelf 1411 may be placed on the cathode current collector 1404 where it may make contact with sealant/adhesive 1408 in order to adhere to the existing structure. The separator shelf 1411 may be added to the laminate structure in such a way as to leave a void across the length of the laminate structure where the cathode blend 1412 rests. This void may be useful in creating a cavity wherein the cathode blend 1412 may rest. Next, at FIG. 14E, a separator 1410 may be placed upon the separator shelf 1411 and the cathode blend 1404.


At FIG. 14F, an anode 1402, which may include an anode current collector, may be added to the laminar structure to rest upon the separator 1410. Adhesive/sealant 1408 may be added to the anode current collector 1402, similar to the cathode current collector 1404, in order to adhere the layers together. Next, at FIG. 14G, a second polymer film capable of sealing 1401, such as polypropylene may be obtained and placed upon the anode current collector 1402, adhered by adhesive/sealant 1408, thus encapsulating the top and bottoms layers of the laminar structure.



FIG. 14H illustrates an exemplary laminar structure after treating the ends of the laminar structure at the adhesive/sealant 1408 sites with a final sealing means such as laser welding, ultrasonic welding, or other similar means of welding. Once sealing at the adhesive/sealant is accomplished, current collector interconnects, such as an anode interconnect 1412 and a cathode interconnect 1414, should be freely available outside of the encapsulated laminar structure. FIG. 14I illustrates an exemplary embodiment of a final encapsulation step wherein all sides of the laminar structure have been sealed leaving only current collector interconnects exposed. Sealing of the laminar structure may be accomplished by different combination of sealing and adhering means. For example, assuming the laminar structure is a rectangular in shape wherein the rectangle consists of two long edges and two short edges, the long edges may be laser welded while the short edges may be adhered by PSAs, or vice versa. Alternatively, the edges of the laminar structure may be uniformly sealed entirely by welding, or entirely by PSAs. The type of seal may depend on the characteristics of the seal, and the need for complete sealing compared to the need for some level of permeability.



FIGS. 15A-15D illustrate exemplary cross-sectional views of the exemplary energization element illustrated in, for example, FIG. 14G. In. FIG. 15A, an exemplary energization element is illustrated with energization components comprising a top and bottom polymer film capable of sealing 1501, an anode current collector 1502 with anode, a cathode current collector 1504 with cathode blend 1512, a separator 1510 placed upon a separator shelf 1511, and adhesive/sealant 1508. The view depicted in FIG. 15A may be considered a “long-edge” view of the energization element, whereas the view depicted in FIGS. 15B-15D may be considered a “short-edge” view of the energization element.


Next, at FIG. 15B, a short-edge view of an energization element illustrates exemplary components placed upon one another. The polymer film capable of sealing 1501, adhesive/sealant 1508, and separator shelf 1511 may all comprise similar materials thus enabling their ability to meld together. After treating the energization element with, for example heat or laser treatment, the polymer film capable of sealing 1501 may begin to seal and envelop the components of the biocompatible energization element while also melding with the adhesive/sealant 1508, the separator shelf 1511, or both, as exemplified in FIG. 15C. The melding of the components may occur on at least one edge of the energization element encapsulation. Finally, at FIG. 15D, an exemplary final view of a short-edge of an energization element is illustrated where the polymer film capable of sealing 1501 has enveloped several components of the energization element by melding with a separator shelf 1511. In some examples, the polymer film capable of sealing 1501 may meld directly to a separator as opposed to a separator shelf 1511. The separator shelf may further encapsulate and seal the energization element by adhering to adhesive/sealant 1508, which in turn may adhere to an interconnect such as a cathode current collector 1504. Alternatively, the polymer film capable of sealing 1501 may be treated in such a manner (heat, ultrasonic, and the like) to meld with the polymer film capable of sealing 1501 given the similarity in material. Further, the polymer film capable of sealing 1501 may be metalized in such a way to then be able to meld directly to a metal interconnect, such as a cathode current collector 1504.


One alternative to the placement of electrodes as depicted in FIGS. 15A-15D may be to insert the electrodes into the laminar structure after partial sealing of the polymer layers capable of sealing. This may be accomplished through such methods as injecting the electrodes into their respective positions.


One alternative to the exemplary method steps illustrated in FIGS. 14A-14I may be the exemplary method steps illustrated in FIGS. 16A-16G. FIGS. 16A-16G illustrate exemplary method steps for sealing and encapsulating a biocompatible energization element wherein, instead of building in a step wise bottom-to-top approach, two distinct halves may be built separately, then converge to complete a laminar structure. FIGS. 16A-16C illustrate exemplary method steps for building a bottom segment of the laminar structure while FIGS. 16D-16G illustrate a top segment. Beginning with FIG. 16A, a cathode current collector 1604 may be placed on top of a polymer film capable of sealing 1601. The cathode current collector 1604 may be lined on an outer edge by an adhesive/sealant 1608 which may be useful for adhering the layers together. Next, at FIG. 16B, a separator shelf 1611 may be placed upon the anode current collector 1604, where it may make contact with adhesive/sealant 1608 in order to adhere to the existing structure. The separator shelf 1611 may be added to the laminar structure in such a way as to leave a void across the length of the laminate structure. This may be accomplished by, for example, inserting two distinct separator shelves, one on each side of the anode current collector 1604, or by placing a solid sheet of separator shelf across the anode current collector 1604, then processing out a middle segment of the separator shelf by, for example, cutting out a middle piece of separator shelf. This void that is created by adding the separator shelf 1611 may be useful in creating a cavity wherein a cathode blend may eventually rest. At FIG. 16 C, a cathode blend 1612 may be applied to the laminar structure, into the cavity. The cathode blend 1612 may be applied to the laminar structure by several means, for example, squeegee application, printer application, needle application, or other means of applying a viscous blend into a cavity.



FIGS. 16D-16G illustrate the exemplary method steps for building a top segment of a laminar structure. At FIG. 16D, an anode and anode current collector 1602 may be placed upon of a polymer film capable of sealing 1601. The anode and anode current collector 1602 may be lined on an outer edge by adhesive/sealant 1608 which may be useful for adhering the layers together. Next, at FIG. 16E, a separator 1610 may be placed upon the anode and anode current collector 1602. At FIG. 16F, the structures depicted in FIG. 16C and FIG. 16E may be combined, one on top of the other, in such a manner as to lineup the adhesive/sealant 1608 of the structures. Once combined, the cathode blend 1612 may disperse into the cavity while still maintaining contact with the separator 1610, the separator shelf 1611, and the cathode current collector 1604. FIG. 16G illustrates an exemplary laminar structure after treating the ends of the laminar structure at the adhesive/sealant 1608 sites with a final sealing means such as laser welding, ultrasonic welding, or other similar means. Once sealing at the adhesive/sealant is accomplished, current collector interconnects, such as an anode interconnect 1612 and a cathode interconnect 1614, should be freely available outside of the encapsulated laminar structure.


Biocompatible energization elements typically require an electrolyte. The electrolyte may be pre-wet onto the cathode and separator prior to assembly. The electrolyte may be dispensed onto the cathode and/or separator after they have been placed into the package. Electrolyte may be added just prior to placement of the top package, or alternatively, may be dispensed into the cell through a needle after partial sealing of the cell.


Sealing of the laminar structure may be accomplished by different combination of sealing and adhering means. For example, assuming the laminar structure is rectangular in shape, wherein the rectangle consists of two long edges and two short edges, the long edges may be laser welded while the short edges may be adhered by PSAs, or vice versa. Alternatively, the edges of the laminar structure may be uniformly sealed entirely by welding, or entirely by PSAs. The type of seal may depend on the characteristics of the seal, and the need for complete sealing compared to the need for some level of permeability. The sealing may occur as a result of: sealing the top polymer film capable of sealing to the bottom polymer film capable of sealing; sealing the polymer film directly to the separator shelf; sealing a metalized version of the polymer film to the current collector; or any other similar methods of sealing the laminar structure.


Additional Package and Substrate Considerations in Biocompatible Battery Modules


There may be numerous packaging and substrate considerations that may dictate desirable characteristics for package designs used in biocompatible laminar microbatteries. For example, the packaging may desirably be predominantly foil and/or film based where these packaging layers may be as thin as possible, for example, 10 to 50 microns. Additionally, the packaging may provide a sufficient diffusion barrier to moisture gain or loss during the shelf life. In many desirable examples, the packaging may provide a sufficient diffusion barrier to oxygen ingress to limit degradation of zinc anodes by direct oxidation.


In some examples, the packaging may provide a finite permeation pathway to hydrogen gas that may evolve due to direct reduction of water by zinc. And, the packaging may desirably sufficiently contain and may isolate the contents of the battery such that potential exposure to a user may be minimized.


In the present invention, packaging constructs may include the following types of functional components: top and bottom packaging layers, PSA layers, spacer layers, interconnect zones, filling ports, and secondary packaging.


In some examples, top and bottom packaging layers may comprise metallic foils or polymer films. Top and bottom packaging layers may comprise multi-layer film constructs containing a plurality of polymer and/or barrier layers. Such film constructs may be referred to as coextruded barrier laminate films. An example of a commercial coextruded barrier laminate film of particular utility in the present invention may be 3M® Scotchpak 1109 backing which consists of a polyethylene terephthalate (PET) carrier web, a vapor-deposited aluminum barrier layer, and a polyethylene layer including a total average film thickness of 33 microns. Numerous other similar multilayer barrier films may be available and may be used in alternate examples of the present invention.


In design constructions including a PSA, packaging layer surface roughness may be of particular importance because the PSA may also need to seal opposing packaging layer faces. Surface roughness may result from manufacturing processes used in foil and film production, for example, processes employing rolling, extruding, embossing and/or calendaring, among others. If the surface is too rough, PSA may be not able to be applied in a uniform thickness when the desired PSA thickness may be on the order of the surface roughness Ra (the arithmetic average of the roughness profile). Furthermore, PSA's may not adequately seal against an opposing face if the opposing face has roughness that may be on the order of the PSA layer thickness. In the present invention, packaging materials having a surface roughness (Ra) less than 10 microns may be acceptable examples. In some examples, surface roughness values may be 5 microns or less. And, in still further examples, the surface roughness may be 1 micron or less. Surface roughness values may be measured by a variety of methods including but not limited to measurement techniques such as white light interferometry, stylus profilometry, and the like. There may be many examples in the art of surface metrology that surface roughness may be described by a number of alternative parameters and that the average surface roughness, Ra, values discussed herein may be meant to be representative of the types of features inherent in the aforementioned manufacturing processes.


Specific examples have been described to illustrate sample embodiments for the methods of sealing and encapsulation for biocompatible batteries. These examples are for said illustration and are not intended to limit the scope of the claims in any manner. Accordingly, the description is intended to embrace all examples that may be apparent to those skilled in the art.

Claims
  • 1. A biomedical device comprising: a. an electroactive element, wherein the electroactive element undergoes a physical or chemical change in response to an electrical signal;b. a circuit;c. a biocompatible energization element, wherein the biocompatible energizing element comprises: a first and second current collector, i. a cathode,ii. an anode,iii. an electrolyte,iv. a laminar stack structure comprising a first and a second laminar construct release layers; and first and second laminar construct adhesive layers located between the first and second laminar construct release layers; and a laminar construct core located between the first and second laminar construct adhesive layers, andv. a first encapsulation for the energization element, wherein the first encapsulation is a polymer film capable of sealing, wherein the polymer film capable of sealing is treated to form a seal with itself and with elements of the biocompatible energization element; andd. a second encapsulation that encapsulates the electroactive element, the circuit, and the biocompatible energization element.
  • 2. The biomedical device of claim 1 wherein the laminar stack structure comprises a cavity structure.
  • 3. The biomedical device of claim 1 wherein the polymer film capable of sealing comprises polypropylene.
  • 4. The biomedical device of claim 1 wherein the polymer film capable of sealing is treated by a means of welding.
  • 5. The biomedical device of claim 4 wherein the polymer film capable of sealing is further adhered to the biocompatible energization element with adhesive.
  • 6. The biomedical device of claim 4 wherein the polymer film capable of sealing is welded to a separator contained within the biocompatible energization element.
  • 7. The biomedical device of claim 4 wherein the polymer film capable of sealing is welded to a separator shelf contained within the biocompatible energization element.
  • 8. The biomedical device of claim 4 wherein the polymer film capable of sealing is welded to a current collector of the biocompatible energization element.
  • 9. The biomedical device of claim 8 wherein the biomedical device is an ophthalmic device.
  • 10. The biomedical device of claim 9 wherein the ophthalmic device is a contact lens.
  • 11. The biomedical device of claim 8 wherein biomedical device is a surgical device.
  • 12. The biomedical device of claim 1 wherein the circuit comprises an integrated circuit.
  • 13. The biomedical device of claim 1 wherein the second encapsulation comprises a hydrogel.
  • 14. A biomedical device comprising: a. a circuit;b. a biocompatible energization element, wherein the biocompatible energizing element comprises: a first and second current collector, i. a cathode,ii. an anode,iii. an electrolyte,iv. a laminar stack structure comprising at least a portion of the cathode, the anode, the electrolyte, and a separator formed at least in part from a UV-curable hydrogel formulation wherein the separator forms a barrier between the cathode and the anode, andv. a first encapsulation for the energization element, wherein the first encapsulation is a polymer film capable of sealing, wherein the polymer film capable of sealing is treated to form a seal with itself and with elements of the biocompatible energization element; andc. a second encapsulation that encapsulates the electroactive element, the circuit, and the biocompatible energization element.
  • 15. The biomedical device of claim 14 wherein the laminar stack structure comprises a cavity structure.
  • 16. The biomedical device of claim 14 wherein the polymer film capable of sealing comprises polypropylene.
  • 17. The biomedical device of claim 14 wherein the polymer film capable of sealing is treated by a means of welding.
  • 18. The biomedical device of claim 17 wherein the polymer film capable of sealing is further adhered to the biocompatible energization element with adhesive.
  • 19. The biomedical device of claim 17 wherein the polymer film capable of sealing is welded to a separator contained within the biocompatible energization element.
  • 20. The biomedical device of claim 17 wherein the polymer film capable of sealing is welded to a separator shelf contained within the biocompatible energization element.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This patent application is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/827,613 filed Aug. 17, 2015 which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/040,178 filed Aug. 21, 2014. The contents of each are hereby incorporated by reference.

US Referenced Citations (331)
Number Name Date Kind
754804 Pratt Mar 1904 A
787657 Quimby Apr 1905 A
1390765 Cox Sep 1921 A
1559562 Edison Nov 1925 A
2871281 Moulton et al. Jan 1959 A
2991324 Vogt Jul 1961 A
3291296 Lemkelde Dec 1966 A
3306776 Tamminen Feb 1967 A
3353998 Langguth et al. Nov 1967 A
3375136 Biggar Mar 1968 A
3431327 George Mar 1969 A
3642539 Kawakami Feb 1972 A
4118860 Buckler Oct 1978 A
4125686 Kinsman Nov 1978 A
4254191 Kniazzeh Mar 1981 A
4268132 Neefe May 1981 A
4294891 Flitsch et al. Oct 1981 A
4408023 Gould et al. Oct 1983 A
4522897 Walsh Jun 1985 A
4592944 Clark et al. Jun 1986 A
4601545 Kern Jul 1986 A
4772517 Muenstedt et al. Sep 1988 A
4783237 Aine et al. Nov 1988 A
4787903 Grendahl Nov 1988 A
4816031 Pfoff Mar 1989 A
4846031 Voytilla et al. Jul 1989 A
4921728 Takiguchi et al. May 1990 A
4939000 Dodds et al. Jul 1990 A
4977046 Bleszinski, Jr. Dec 1990 A
5112703 Koenig May 1992 A
5168018 Yoshizawa et al. Dec 1992 A
5219497 Blum Jun 1993 A
5227805 King et al. Jul 1993 A
5358539 Dawson Oct 1994 A
5430693 Ganter et al. Jul 1995 A
5435874 Takeuchi et al. Jul 1995 A
5478420 Gauci et al. Dec 1995 A
5492782 Higley Feb 1996 A
5540741 Gozdz et al. Jul 1996 A
5549988 Reichert et al. Aug 1996 A
5568353 Bai et al. Oct 1996 A
5596567 Demuro et al. Jan 1997 A
5600180 Kusaka et al. Feb 1997 A
5607485 Gozdz et al. Mar 1997 A
5682210 Weirich Oct 1997 A
5712721 Large Jan 1998 A
5792574 Mitate et al. Aug 1998 A
5928808 Eshraghi Jul 1999 A
6004691 Eshraghi Dec 1999 A
6134188 Ganter et al. Oct 2000 A
6168884 Neudecker et al. Jan 2001 B1
6217171 Auten et al. Apr 2001 B1
6242132 Neudecker et al. Jun 2001 B1
6269266 Chiao et al. Jul 2001 B1
6273904 Chen Aug 2001 B1
6277520 Moutsios Aug 2001 B1
6282668 Neudecker Aug 2001 B1
6316142 Delnick Nov 2001 B1
6322589 Cumming Nov 2001 B1
6355501 Fung et al. Mar 2002 B1
6364482 Roffman et al. Apr 2002 B1
6379835 Kucherovsky Apr 2002 B1
6434429 Kraus et al. Aug 2002 B1
6447669 Lain Sep 2002 B1
6470215 Kraus et al. Oct 2002 B1
6477410 Henley et al. Nov 2002 B1
6490487 Kraus et al. Dec 2002 B1
6517974 Kobayashi et al. Feb 2003 B1
6544171 Beetz et al. Apr 2003 B2
6553262 Lang et al. Apr 2003 B1
6574509 Kraus et al. Jun 2003 B1
6599778 Pogge et al. Jul 2003 B2
6622043 Kraus et al. Sep 2003 B1
6638304 Azar Oct 2003 B2
6770176 Benson et al. Aug 2004 B2
6852254 Spaulding et al. Feb 2005 B2
6893395 Kraus et al. May 2005 B1
6924036 Polastri et al. Aug 2005 B2
7324287 Gollier Jan 2008 B1
7404636 Blum et al. Jul 2008 B2
7407728 Wenneis et al. Aug 2008 B2
7410700 Wang Aug 2008 B2
7423801 Kaufman et al. Sep 2008 B2
7548040 Lee et al. Jun 2009 B2
7581124 Jacobson et al. Aug 2009 B1
7755583 Meredith Jul 2010 B2
7794511 Johnson et al. Sep 2010 B2
7794643 Watanabe et al. Sep 2010 B2
7798301 Keating et al. Sep 2010 B2
7876573 Motohara et al. Jan 2011 B2
7901811 Hambitzer et al. Mar 2011 B2
7959769 Zhang et al. Jun 2011 B2
7968991 Wong et al. Jun 2011 B2
7985500 Root Jul 2011 B2
7991934 Yao et al. Aug 2011 B2
7993773 Snyder et al. Aug 2011 B2
8014164 Yang Sep 2011 B2
8014166 Yazdani Sep 2011 B2
8061130 Shibasaki Nov 2011 B2
8309397 Shim, II et al. Nov 2012 B2
8343216 Brady et al. Jan 2013 B2
8433409 Martin et al. Apr 2013 B2
8579435 Blum et al. Nov 2013 B2
8857983 Pugh et al. Oct 2014 B2
8950862 Pugh et al. Feb 2015 B2
9102111 Pugh et al. Aug 2015 B2
9110310 Pugh et al. Aug 2015 B2
9134546 Pugh et al. Sep 2015 B2
9195075 Pugh et al. Nov 2015 B2
9233513 Pugh et al. Jan 2016 B2
9296158 Pugh et al. Mar 2016 B2
9601780 Kato Mar 2017 B2
9746695 Flitsch et al. Aug 2017 B2
20020009649 Sato et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020041027 Sugizaki Apr 2002 A1
20020041999 Moutsios et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020058151 Uchikoba et al. May 2002 A1
20020110728 Gozdz et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020162631 Wien et al. Nov 2002 A1
20030002160 Johnson et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030021601 Goldstein Jan 2003 A1
20030059526 Benson et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030064292 Neudecker et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030068559 Armstrong et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030069666 Nagler Apr 2003 A1
20030137922 Ro et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030146414 Ndzebet Aug 2003 A1
20030165744 Schubert Sep 2003 A1
20030207978 Yadav Nov 2003 A1
20040000732 Spaulding et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040027536 Blum et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040062985 Aamodt Apr 2004 A1
20040084790 Blum et al. May 2004 A1
20040091779 Kang May 2004 A1
20040131925 Jenson et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040239784 Ibe Dec 2004 A1
20040239874 Swab et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040241528 Sarpeshkar et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040242794 Kanazawa Dec 2004 A1
20040258982 Coffey Dec 2004 A1
20050009959 Bair et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050031959 Kato et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050036109 Blum et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050069760 Somatomo Mar 2005 A1
20050099594 Blum et al. May 2005 A1
20050147877 Tarnowski et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050185135 Blum et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050208381 Boulton Sep 2005 A1
20050231377 Sunderman et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050231677 Meredith Oct 2005 A1
20050255079 Santerre et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050271796 Neudecker et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060001137 Hundt et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060024567 Heller et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060026201 Cabillic Feb 2006 A1
20060026505 Mani et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060038536 Lafollette et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060065989 Druffel et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060066808 Blum et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060095128 Blum et al. May 2006 A1
20060099496 Aamodt May 2006 A1
20060127761 Phillips et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060152912 Karrer et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060166088 Hokanson et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060181676 Tucker et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060202359 Chen Sep 2006 A1
20060204839 Richards et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060210877 Manko et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060226556 Kurita et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060234121 Kim I et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060255441 Ohta Nov 2006 A1
20060265058 Silvestrini Nov 2006 A1
20060267167 McCain Nov 2006 A1
20060267768 Sabeta Nov 2006 A1
20070052876 Kaufman et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070090869 Adewole et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070125644 Heller Jun 2007 A1
20070128420 Maghribi Jun 2007 A1
20070141463 Stevanovic Jun 2007 A1
20070156184 Root Jul 2007 A1
20070159562 Haddock et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070231575 Watanabe et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070242171 Mori Oct 2007 A1
20070242173 Blum et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070285385 Albert et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080002149 Fritsch et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080020127 Whiteford et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080020874 Huang et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080024848 Kawano et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080024858 Kaufman et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080042227 Asano et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080048180 Abe et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080058652 Payne Mar 2008 A1
20080079396 Yamazaki et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080086206 Nasiatka et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080101267 Kurokawa May 2008 A1
20080187824 Tomantschger Aug 2008 A1
20080208335 Blum et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080212007 Meredith Sep 2008 A1
20080241683 Fensore et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080261390 Chen et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080280184 Yao et al. Nov 2008 A1
20090002012 Doong et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090003383 Watanabe et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090033863 Blum et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090042065 Simon et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090042066 Simon et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090046349 Haddock et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090050267 Conlon et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090057289 Williams Mar 2009 A1
20090079641 Cruzado et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090091818 Haddock et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090092903 Johnson Apr 2009 A1
20090098281 Zhang Apr 2009 A1
20090105817 Bretthauer et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090142656 Nathan et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090175016 Legen et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090182426 Von et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090202899 Pyszczek Aug 2009 A1
20090204207 Blum et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090204454 Lagudi Aug 2009 A1
20090206498 Tepedino, Jr. et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090243125 Pugh et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090244477 Pugh et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090256977 Haddock et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090269392 Tauber et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090278503 Hundt et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090288405 Shibasaki Nov 2009 A1
20100001926 Amirparviz et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100002190 Clarke et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100062342 Li Mar 2010 A1
20100072643 Pugh Mar 2010 A1
20100073534 Yano et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100076553 Pugh Mar 2010 A1
20100078837 Pugh Apr 2010 A1
20100078838 Pugh et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100079724 Pugh et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100103368 Amirparviz et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100103369 Pugh et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100109175 Pugh et al. May 2010 A1
20100110372 Pugh et al. May 2010 A1
20100149777 Yamamoto et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100178543 Gruner et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100211186 Senders et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100261071 Lopatin et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100266895 Tucholski Oct 2010 A1
20100295135 Masuoka et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100310932 Leysieffer Dec 2010 A1
20110007656 He et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110039150 Wang et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110045112 Pugh et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110065706 Wensley et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110074281 Farquhar et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110076567 Bouillon Mar 2011 A1
20110076568 Bouillon Mar 2011 A1
20110086077 McCrea et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110091778 Kambara Apr 2011 A1
20110134683 Yamazaki et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110143225 Sakai et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110174431 Darmes et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110230963 Cuevas Sep 2011 A1
20110284912 Sekine et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110287318 Loveness et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110311877 Matsuda et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120024295 Mihin Feb 2012 A1
20120026598 Pugh et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120038881 Amirparviz Feb 2012 A1
20120057244 Pugh et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120088129 Kaneda Apr 2012 A1
20120092612 Binder Apr 2012 A1
20120100412 Kwon et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120107666 Bailey May 2012 A1
20120115041 West May 2012 A1
20120156259 Rau et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120162600 Pugh Jun 2012 A1
20120171599 Nakagawa et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120188467 Escuti et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120196187 Fujinami et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120218508 Pugh et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120234453 Pugh et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120235277 Pugh et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120236254 Pugh et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120236524 Pugh Sep 2012 A1
20120242953 Pugh et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120245444 Otis et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120259188 Besling et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120282519 Freitag et al. Nov 2012 A1
20130019540 Magnus Jan 2013 A1
20130023005 Chen et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130024575 Taylor et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130034760 Otts Feb 2013 A1
20130065122 Chiang et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130089769 Proctor et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130155371 Zhang Jun 2013 A1
20130194540 Pugh et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130196214 Scott Aug 2013 A1
20130215380 Pugh et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130245754 Blum et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130245755 Fehr et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130266855 Kim et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130266873 Ishii et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130309547 Bazzarella Nov 2013 A1
20140000101 Pugh Jan 2014 A1
20140002788 Otts Jan 2014 A1
20140017557 Lockett et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140036226 Blum et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140047742 Schloss Feb 2014 A1
20140121557 Gannon May 2014 A1
20140147742 Anastas May 2014 A1
20140148899 Fehr et al. May 2014 A1
20140227574 Savinell et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140272522 Pugh et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140306361 Pugh et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140323968 Rogers et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140342247 Kishida et al. Nov 2014 A1
20150212339 Pugh et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150214567 Etzkorn Jul 2015 A1
20150281411 Markus Oct 2015 A1
20150287960 Andry Oct 2015 A1
20150288023 Andry et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150288024 Andry et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150309337 Flitsch et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150323811 Zhang et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150378176 Flitsch et al. Dec 2015 A1
20160028101 Flitsch et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160054589 Flitsch et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160054590 Otts et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160056440 Flitsch et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160056459 Flitsch et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160056498 Birch et al. Feb 2016 A1
20170229730 Flitsch et al. Aug 2017 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (248)
Number Date Country
073391 Nov 2010 AR
073742 Dec 2010 AR
2009293178 Mar 2010 AU
2009293182 Mar 2010 AU
2014201529 Oct 2014 AU
PI0919346 Dec 2015 BR
2389907 Dec 2003 CA
2737861 Mar 2010 CA
2737865 Mar 2010 CA
1344022 Apr 2002 CN
1520983 Aug 2004 CN
1808744 Jul 2006 CN
101041258 Sep 2007 CN
101062581 Oct 2007 CN
101094626 Dec 2007 CN
100403477 Jul 2008 CN
101395520 Mar 2009 CN
101669059 Mar 2010 CN
101983122 Mar 2011 CN
102005612 Apr 2011 CN
102159381 Aug 2011 CN
102159382 Aug 2011 CN
102171028 Aug 2011 CN
102196789 Sep 2011 CN
102202874 Sep 2011 CN
102271899 Dec 2011 CN
102727218 Oct 2012 CN
102959769 Mar 2013 CN
203300756 Nov 2013 CN
203733888 Jul 2014 CN
102196789 Nov 2014 CN
19858172 Jun 2000 DE
102007048859 Apr 2009 DE
581964 Feb 1994 EP
918248 May 1999 EP
1183745 Mar 2002 EP
1262307 Dec 2002 EP
1313159 May 2003 EP
1342560 Sep 2003 EP
1262307 Nov 2003 EP
1342560 Sep 2004 EP
1736291 Dec 2006 EP
1747879 Jan 2007 EP
1736291 Mar 2007 EP
1747879 Mar 2007 EP
1760515 Mar 2007 EP
1849574 Oct 2007 EP
1849589 Oct 2007 EP
1892788 Feb 2008 EP
1342560 Jul 2008 EP
1849589 Mar 2009 EP
1262307 Feb 2010 EP
1760515 Aug 2011 EP
2349697 Aug 2011 EP
2349698 Aug 2011 EP
2485294 Aug 2012 EP
2508935 Oct 2012 EP
2564454 Mar 2013 EP
2605314 Jun 2013 EP
2620802 Jul 2013 EP
2631962 Aug 2013 EP
2779272 Sep 2014 EP
2812750 Dec 2014 EP
2996187 Mar 2016 EP
2740170 Apr 2016 EP
3016194 May 2016 EP
743731 Jan 1956 GB
1307393 Feb 1973 GB
211275-D Apr 2011 IL
211309-D Apr 2011 IL
222620D Dec 2012 IL
S52146650 Dec 1977 JP
S57136774 Aug 1982 JP
S58116764 Jul 1983 JP
S63105319 Jul 1988 JP
H01286809 Nov 1989 JP
H0765817 Mar 1995 JP
H08162823 Jun 1996 JP
H08508826 Sep 1996 JP
H08264203 Oct 1996 JP
H09266636 Oct 1997 JP
H10209185 Aug 1998 JP
H10219185 Aug 1998 JP
H10229095 Aug 1998 JP
H11135712 May 1999 JP
2000228213 Aug 2000 JP
2000299542 Oct 2000 JP
2001028036 Jan 2001 JP
2001110445 Apr 2001 JP
2002093385 Mar 2002 JP
2002118198 Apr 2002 JP
2002537580 Nov 2002 JP
2003202525 Jul 2003 JP
2004505667 Feb 2004 JP
2004305313 Nov 2004 JP
2005142050 Jun 2005 JP
2005523483 Aug 2005 JP
2005535942 Nov 2005 JP
2006507541 Mar 2006 JP
2006093659 Apr 2006 JP
2006317321 Nov 2006 JP
2007533098 Nov 2007 JP
2007313594 Dec 2007 JP
2008502016 Jan 2008 JP
2008506031 Feb 2008 JP
2008053134 Mar 2008 JP
2008072111 Mar 2008 JP
2008088019 Apr 2008 JP
2008512348 Apr 2008 JP
2008178226 Jul 2008 JP
2008529208 Jul 2008 JP
2008227068 Sep 2008 JP
2008281095 Nov 2008 JP
2009007629 Jan 2009 JP
2009087895 Apr 2009 JP
2010034254 Feb 2010 JP
2010073533 Apr 2010 JP
2010517081 May 2010 JP
2010209855 Sep 2010 JP
2010536158 Nov 2010 JP
2011082586 Apr 2011 JP
2011512565 Apr 2011 JP
2011515157 May 2011 JP
2011516922 May 2011 JP
2011516927 May 2011 JP
2011517659 Jun 2011 JP
2012009820 Jan 2012 JP
2012502823 Feb 2012 JP
2012503222 Feb 2012 JP
2012504065 Feb 2012 JP
2012504257 Feb 2012 JP
2012044074 Mar 2012 JP
2012056758 Mar 2012 JP
2012507747 Mar 2012 JP
2013516255 May 2013 JP
2013532010 Aug 2013 JP
2013533046 Aug 2013 JP
2013176558 Sep 2013 JP
2013239263 Nov 2013 JP
5591567 Sep 2014 JP
5788668 Oct 2015 JP
100625892 Sep 2006 KR
20070009231 Jan 2007 KR
20100102969 Sep 2010 KR
20100132003 Dec 2010 KR
20110069113 Jun 2011 KR
20110073530 Jun 2011 KR
20130096676 Aug 2013 KR
2116891 Aug 1998 RU
2307429 Sep 2007 RU
2310952 Nov 2007 RU
2320378 Mar 2008 RU
2380794 Jan 2010 RU
2563842 Sep 2015 RU
10201400548X Oct 2014 SG
10201506558 Mar 2016 SG
200532278 Oct 2005 TW
200629549 Aug 2006 TW
200916832 Apr 2009 TW
200950960 Dec 2009 TW
201003172 Jan 2010 TW
201024827 Jul 2010 TW
201026489 Jul 2010 TW
201029830 Aug 2010 TW
201140756 Nov 2011 TW
I384672 Feb 2013 TW
WO-9423334 Oct 1994 WO
WO1997017737 May 1997 WO
WO-0004601 Jan 2000 WO
WO2000057504 Sep 2000 WO
WO2002029836 Apr 2002 WO
WO-03035166 May 2003 WO
WO2003069700 Aug 2003 WO
WO-03078300 Sep 2003 WO
WO-03090611 Nov 2003 WO
WO-2004015460 Feb 2004 WO
WO-2004015460 Jun 2004 WO
WO2003069700 Aug 2004 WO
WO-2004093786 Nov 2004 WO
WO2005064712 Jul 2005 WO
WO-2005088388 Sep 2005 WO
WO-2005098994 Oct 2005 WO
WO-2006050171 May 2006 WO
WO-2006077192 Jul 2006 WO
WO2006078103 Jul 2006 WO
WO-2006078472 Jul 2006 WO
WO-2006050171 Sep 2006 WO
WO-2005098994 Nov 2006 WO
WO-2006115649 Nov 2006 WO
WO-2007050402 May 2007 WO
WO-2006115649 Jun 2007 WO
WO-2007072781 Jun 2007 WO
WO-2007081959 Jul 2007 WO
WO2007102692 Sep 2007 WO
WO-2008010390 Jan 2008 WO
WO2008039806 Apr 2008 WO
WO-2007081959 May 2008 WO
WO2008039806 Jul 2008 WO
WO-2008091859 Jul 2008 WO
WO-2008103906 Aug 2008 WO
WO-2008109867 Sep 2008 WO
WO-2008109867 Oct 2008 WO
WO-2008103906 Nov 2008 WO
WO2009012463 Jan 2009 WO
WO2009018315 Feb 2009 WO
WO-2009025763 Feb 2009 WO
WO-2007050402 Mar 2009 WO
WO-2009038897 Mar 2009 WO
WO-2009038897 Jun 2009 WO
WO-2009105261 Aug 2009 WO
WO-2009109867 Sep 2009 WO
WO-2009113296 Sep 2009 WO
WO-2009117506 Sep 2009 WO
WO-2009117506 Jan 2010 WO
WO-2010033679 Mar 2010 WO
WO-2010033683 Mar 2010 WO
WO-2010039610 Apr 2010 WO
WO-2010051203 May 2010 WO
WO-2010051225 May 2010 WO
WO-2010058574 May 2010 WO
WO-2010033679 Jun 2010 WO
WO-2010051225 Jun 2010 WO
WO-2010062504 Jun 2010 WO
WO-2010039610 Jul 2010 WO
WO-2010082993 Jul 2010 WO
WO-2010082993 Sep 2010 WO
WO-2010119754 Oct 2010 WO
WO-2010133317 Nov 2010 WO
WO-2011005216 Jan 2011 WO
WO-2011007548 Jan 2011 WO
WO2011015866 Feb 2011 WO
WO-2011083105 Jul 2011 WO
WO-2010133317 Oct 2011 WO
WO2011137239 Nov 2011 WO
WO-2011153158 Dec 2011 WO
WO-2011163080 Dec 2011 WO
WO-2012013774 Feb 2012 WO
WO-2012018583 Feb 2012 WO
WO-2012023774 Feb 2012 WO
WO2012046854 Apr 2012 WO
WO-2012129210 Sep 2012 WO
WO-2013019525 Feb 2013 WO
WO03065481 Aug 2013 WO
WO-2013112748 Aug 2013 WO
WO2013128206 Sep 2013 WO
WO2014010526 Jan 2014 WO
WO-2014049089 Apr 2014 WO
WO2014071571 May 2014 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (88)
Entry
A. M. Gaikwad, B. V. Khau, G. Davies, B. Hertzberg, D. A. Steingart, and A. C. Arias, “A High Areal Capacity Flexible Lithium-Ion Battery with a Strain-Compliant Design,” Advanced Enemy Materials, vol. 5, iss, 3, 2015.
A, M. Gaikwad, A. C. Arias, and D. A. Steingart, “Recent Progress on Printed Flexible Batteries: Mechanical Challenges Printing Technologies, and Future Prospects,” Energy Technology, 2015.
A. E. Ostfeld, I. Deckman, A. M. Gaikwad, C. M. Lochner, and A. C. Arias, “Screen printed passive components for flexible power electronics,” Scientific reports, vol. 5, 2015.
Y. Oka et al., “Preparation of cathode film with use of aqueous solvent system”, 224th ECS Meeting (Abstract #851), Oct. 27, 2013, Nov. 1, 2013, XP055442472, San Francisco, CA, USA *part “Experimental procedures”*.
Herb Geduld , “Zinc Plating”, XP055290076, Columbia Chemical Corp., Macedonia, OH Jan. 1, 1988.
Fernando Yanez et al., “Macromolecule release and smoothness of semi-interpenetrating PVP-pHEMA networks for comfortable soft contact lenses”, European Journal of Pharmaceutics, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam, NL, vol. 69, No. 3, Aug. 1, 2008, pp. 1094-1103, XP023519572, ISSN: 0939-6411.
Elena A. Belyaeva et al., “Mechanism(s) of Toxic Action of Zn2+ and Selenite: A Study on AS-30D Hepatoma Cells and Isolated Mitochondria”, Biochemistry Research International, vol. 42, No. 6, Jan. 1, 2011, pp. 361-313.
Albano et al., “Design of an Implantable power supply for an intraocular sensor, using Power (power optimization for wireless energy requirements)” Journal of Power Soureces, Elsevier SA, CH, vol. 170, No. 1, Apr. 11, 2007, pp. 216-224.
Stani A. et al., “Development of flat plate rechargeable alkaline manganese dioxide-zinc cells”, Journal of Power Sources, Elsevier SA, vol. 153, No. 2, Jun. 28, 2005, pp. 405-412.
Benefits of PVC (Year: 2018), 1 page.
Beynw E., “3D System Integration Technologies”, 2006, IEEE, International Symposium on VLSI Technology, System and Applications, 2006, 9 pages.
Breakthrough Technologies Driving Successful Energy Harvesting-Powered Products, PSMA Energy Harvesting Forum, Mar. 2014. [retrieved on Jan. 22, 2018] Retrieved from the Internet:[URL:http://www.psma.com/sites/default/files/uploads/tech-forums-energy-harvesting/presentations/is 1-1-1-energy-harvesting-market -requirements-economicsv].
Bruno L.J.S., et al., “Correlation Between Morphological Properties and Ionic Conductivity in an Electrolyte Based on Poly(Vinylidene Fluoride) and Poly(2-hydroxyethyl Methacrylate),” Materials Research, Feb. 2014, vol. 17 (1), pp. 115-120, XP055227556.
Cohen└addad J.P., et al., “NMR Study of the Demixing Process in Concentrated polyisobutylene Solutions,” Journal of Polymer Science: Polymer Physics Edition, Sep. 1981, vol. 19 (9), pp. 1395-1403.
Davies C., “Opto-Electronic Contact Lenses Promise Wireless Displays,” Nov. 2009. Retrieved from the Internet:[URL:http://www.slashgear.com/opto-electronic-contact-lenses-promise-wireless—displays-2564454/].
Extended European Search Report for Application No. 13152733.5, dated Apr. 30, 2013, 7 pages.
Extended European Search Report for Application No. 13155410, dated Jun. 5, 2013, 5 pages.
Extended European Search Report for Application No. 13156410, dated Jun. 13, 2013, 8 pages.
Extended European Search Report for Application No. 14159971, dated Jun. 5, 2014, 6 pages.
Extended European Search Report for Application No. 18160035.4, dated Jun. 27, 2018, 20 pages.
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP13156428, dated Jun. 6, 2013, 9 pages.
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP15181836, dated Dec. 1, 2015, 12 pages.
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP15181868, dated Jan. 12, 2016, 12 pages.
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP15181875, dated Jun. 14, 2016, 12 pages.
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP13702567.2, dated Aug. 2, 2018, 8 pages.
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP15181799, dated Jun. 14, 2016, 23 pages.
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP15181817, dated Feb. 15, 2016, 13 pages.
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP15181854, dated May 18, 2016, 11 pages.
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP15181855, dated May 3, 2016, 13 pages.
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP15181857, dated Dec. 9, 2015, 8 pages.
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP15181860, dated Feb. 17, 2016, 15 pages.
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP15181862, dated Apr. 18, 2016, 12 pages.
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP15181863, dated Apr. 22, 2016, 14 pages.
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP15181865, dated Aug. 2, 2016, 21 pages.
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP15181872, dated Apr. 5, 2016, 12 pages.
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP15181874, dated Feb. 19, 2016, 11 pages.
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP16200268, dated Jan. 20, 2017, 8 pages.
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP16200270, dated Jan. 5, 2017, 8 pages.
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP17205191, dated Jan. 30, 2018, 14 pages.
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP18169197, dated Jul. 27, 2018, 8 pages.
Gosalia K.C., “Novel Compact Antennas for Biomedical Implants and Wireless Applications,” PhD Dissertation, North Carolina State University, 2004, [retrieved on Dec. 22, 2014] Retrieved from the Internet[URL:http://respitory.lib.ncsu.edu/ir/bitstream/1840.16/4508/1/etd.pdf?-origin=publication.sub.--detail].
Herb G., Zinc Plating [Online], Jan. 1, 1988 [retrieved on Jul. 20, 2016]. Retrieved from the Internet: (URL:http://infohouse.p2ric.orgjref/29/28085.pdf), XP055290076.
Hill J., “How to Uniformly Disperse Nanoparticles in Battery Cathode Coatings,” Advanced Materials and Processes, May 2010, vol. 168 (5), pp. 34-36.
International Preliminary Report for Patentability for Application No. PCT/US2013/023005, dated Jul. 29, 2014, 5 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/US2009/057284, dated Mar. 22, 2011, 10 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/US2009/057289, dated Mar. 22, 2011, 6 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/US2012/026849, dated Sep. 3, 2013, 8 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/US2012/029769, dated Sep. 24, 2013, 10 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/US2012/048229, dated Feb. 4, 2014, 7 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/US2013/023097, dated Jul. 29, 2014, 11 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/US2013/023182, dated Jul. 29, 2014, 8 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/US2013/023190, dated Jul. 29, 2014, 8 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2013/023190, dated Apr. 15, 2013, 10 pages.
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/US2009/057284, dated May 4, 2010, 6 pages.
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/US2009/057289, dated Dec. 23, 2009, 3 pages.
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/US2012/023190, dated Apr. 15, 2013, 4 pages.
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/US2012/026849, dated Jul. 2, 2012, 5 pages.
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/US2012/029769, dated Oct. 2, 2012, 8 pages.
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/US2012/029796, dated Oct. 2, 2012, 4 pages.
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/US2012/048229, dated Nov. 21, 2012, 3 pages.
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/US2013/023005, dated Apr. 26, 2013, 4 pages.
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/US2013/023097, dated Aug. 7, 2013, 6 pages.
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/US2013/023182, dated Apr. 29, 2013, 4 pages.
Loy M., et al., “ISM-Band and Short Range Device Antennas,” Texas Instruments Application Report, Aug. 2005. Retrieved from the Internet:[URL:http://www.ti.com/lit/an/swra046a/swra046a.pdf].
Neudecker B.J., et al., “Power Fibers: Thin-Film Batteries on Fiber Substrates,” Report Documented by ITN Energy Systems, Inc., Littleton, CO, 2003, pp. 1-9.
Orca S., “Micro Machines and Opto-Electronics on a Contact Lens”, Nov. 2009. Retrieved from the Internet:[URL:http://hplusmagazine.com/2009/11/20/micro-machines-and-opto-electronics-contact-lense/].
Pandey J., et al., “A Fully Integrated RF-Powered Contact Lens With a Single Element Display,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems, Dec. 2010, vol. 4 (6), pp. 454-461.
Pandey J., et al., “Toward an Active Contact Lens: Integration of a Wireless Power Harvesting IC,” Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference, 2009, BioCAS 2009, pp. 125-128. Retrieved from the Internet[URL: https://wireless.ee.washington.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/17/2013/03/biocas2009_jnpyudobpo.pdf.
Partial European Search Report for Application No. 18160035.4, dated Apr. 19, 2018, 17 pages.
Partial European Search Report for Application No. EP15181799.6, dated Feb. 29, 2016, 9 pages.
Partial European Search Report for Application No. EP15181865, dated Apr. 11, 2016, 7 pages.
Parviz B.A., “Augmented Reality in a Contact Lens, A New Generation of Contact Lenses Built With Very Small Circuits and LEDs Promises Bionic Eyesight,” IEEE Spectrum.org/biomedical/bionics, [retrieved Jul. 10, 2012].
Parviz B.A., “Augmented Reality in a Contact Lens,” IEEE Spectrum, Sep. 2009. Retrieved from the Internet:[URL:https://spectrum.ieee.org/biomedical/bionics/augmented-reality-in-a-contact-lens].
Ratta V., “Crystallization, Morphology, Thermal Stability and Adhesive Properties of Novel High Performance Semicrystalline Polyimides,” Virginia Tech University, Chapter 4, PhD Dissertation defended Apr. 26, 1999.
Shi S., et al., “Flexible Asymmetric Supercapacitors Based on Ultrathin Two-dimensional Nanosheets With Outstanding Electrochemical Performance and Aesthetic Property—Supplementary Information (SI),” Scientific Reports, Feb. 11, 2014, vol. 3, Article No. 2598, pp. 1-10, XP055485252, Retrieved from the Internet: URL: https://media.nature.com/original/nature-assets/srep/2013/130906/srep02598/extref/srep02598-s1.pdf.
Singapore Search Report for Application No. SG-201300387-6, dated Jul. 4, 2013.
Singapore Written Opinion for Application No. SG11201404171Y, dated Mar. 31, 2015.
Tafur, J.P., et al., “Influence of the Ionic Liquid Type on the Gel Polymer Electrolytes Properties,” Membranes (Basel), Dec. 2015, vol. 5(4), pp. 752-771.
Williams A., “Swiss Startup Puts MEMS Sensor in Contact Lens,” Electronics Weekly.com, Mar. 25, 2010. Retrieved from the Internet[URL:https://www.electronicsweekly.com/technology-startups/general-technology-startups/swiss-startup-puts-mems-sensor-2010-03/swiss-startup-puts-mems-sensor.html].
Written opinion for Application No. PCT/US2009/057284, dated May 4, 2010, 9 pages.
Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2009/057289, dated Mar. 22, 2011, 5 pages.
Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2012/026849, dated Aug. 31, 2013, 7 pages.
Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2012/029769, dated Sep. 21, 2013, 9 pages.
Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2012/048229, dated Feb. 2, 2014, 6 pages.
Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2013/023005, dated Jul. 26, 2014, 7 pages.
Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2013/023097, dated Jul. 26, 2014, 10 pages.
Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2013/023182, dated Jul. 26, 2014, 7 pages.
Jani Miettinen et al., “System Design Issue for 3D System-in-Package (SiP)”, 2004, vol. 1, p. 610-615.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20170168318 A1 Jun 2017 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62040178 Aug 2014 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 14827613 Aug 2015 US
Child 15440953 US