The present invention is directed to a bone plating system, and in particular to a system for the fixation of a canine humerus following a slide osteotomy.
Elbow dysplasia, including fragmentation of the medial coronoid process of the ulna (FCP), is the most common forelimb orthopedic disorder recognized to cause joint pain and lameness in large and giant breed dogs. Fragmented medial coronoid process (“FCP”) with secondary osteoarthritis is one of the most common, yet poorly understood, hereditary syndromes of pure and mixed breed dogs. FCP is characterized by fragmentation of the cartilage and subchondral bone on the lateral aspect of the medial coronoid process, with grade II to grade IV cartilage erosion over the center of the medial coronoid process. The pathophysiology of FCP has not been well defined but may include joint incongruity and increased transarticular pressure.
Management of FCP consists of surgical and medical treatments. Surgical management includes removal of fragments and debridement of cartilage lesions, proximal ulnar osteotomy, and total elbow arthroplasty. Studies have historically suggested that when compared with medical treatment, surgical removal of FCP via arthrotomy did not result in improved long-term clinical outcome (e.g., see, Read 1990, Bouck 1995, Boulay 1998, Cook 2001). This finding was recently challenged, however, in a study where 247 elbow joints were treated with a conventional arthrotomy and 271 joints were treated by arthroscopy. It was reported that arthroscopy provided better functional results, but that progression of artbrosis was similar following both techniques (e.g., see, Meyer-Lindenberg 2003 VC01).
The purposes of proximal ulnar osteotomy are to alter the biomechanical forces in the elbow joint by redistributing articular loads to alleviate excessive loads on the coronoid process of the ulna. Little is known about the effectiveness of this procedure, with no long term follow up or placebo control studies (e.g., see, Ness 1998). Total elbow arthroplasty (“TEA”) has been reported to achieve success for severe elbow osteoarthritis, but the success in cases with mild to moderate elbow arthritis has yet to be determined (e.g., see, Lewis 1996, Conz 1998, 2001).
Ulnar osteotomies have been used to correct or alter loads across the canine elbow joint for the management of FCP with the goal of correcting radio-ulnar incongruity (e.g., see, Ness 1998). These techniques presume that the proximal ulnar articular surface is elevated above the radial articular surface leading to increased medial compartmental pressure, cartilage degeneration and subchondral bone fragmentation. A joint surface contact study simulating radio-ulnar incongruence did demonstrate that radio-ulnar incongruence results in shifting of contact to the lateral region of the medial coronoid process, the area where fragmentation most often occurs (e.g., see, DeCamp 1993). The study also evaluated the effect of proximal and distal ulnar osteotomies on correction of the incongruity. A proximal ulnar osteotomy stabilized with an intramedullary pin did restore normal contact patterns in the in vitro model; however, radio-ulnar incongruence has not been definitively identified as the cause of FCP. In the absence of this incongruence, an osteotomy of the ulna may lead to varus deformity of the limb and subsequently increased loads on the medial compartment.
Thus, there exists a need for an improved treatment of the canine elbow joint, as well as a related bone plating system for this improved treatment.
The present invention is directed in general to the field of canine humeral osteotomy, and in particular to an osteotomy plate. In one embodiment, the osteotomy plate includes a proximal plate portion lying substantially in a first plane for application to the humerus. The proximal plate portion has a bottom surface adapted for application to the surface of the humerus, and the proximal plate portion has at least one overlapping hole formed therein. The osteotomy plate also includes a distal plate portion lying substantially in a second plane for application to the humerus. The distal plate portion has a bottom surface adapted for application to the surface of the humerus, and the distal plate portion has at least one overlapping hole formed therein. The osteotomy plate also includes a transition region connecting the proximal plate portion to the distal plate portion.
In another embodiment, the osteotomy plate includes a proximal plate portion lying substantially in a first plane for application to the humerus. The proximal plate portion has a bottom surface adapted for application to the surface of the humerus, and the proximal plate portion has at least one dynamic compression hole formed therein. The osteotomy plate also includes a distal plate portion lying substantially in a second plane for application to the humerus. The distal plate portion has a bottom surface adapted for application to the surface of the humerus, and the distal plate portion has at least one dynamic compression hole formed therein. The osteotomy plate also includes a transition region connecting the proximal plate portion to the distal plate portion, and a round non-dynamic compression hole located adjacent to the transition region and formed in either one or both of the proximal and the distal portions.
In one aspect, either one of the dynamic compression hole and the round hole is a threaded hole for engaging a bone screw having a thread configured and dimensioned to mate the thread of the threaded hole.
In one aspect, both of the dynamic compression hole and the round hole are threaded holes for engaging a bone screw having a thread configured and dimensioned to mate the thread of the threaded holes.
In another aspect, the osteotomy plate is a part of an osteotomy system which further includes a template for the osteotomy plate. The template includes an elongate member having a first end and second end: a first screw hole formed near the first end and a second screw hole formed near the second end, where the first and the second screw holes are positioned and dimensioned to accommodate the bone screws being used with the osteotomy plate. The template also has a gap formed near the center of the template, where the gap is dimensioned to accommodate the thickness of a saw blade being used to perform the osteotomy; and flare members formed on either side of the gap, where the flare members bridge the gap, so as not to impede the oscillation of a bone saw being used to perform the osteotomy.
For a further understanding of the nature and advantages of the invention, reference should be made to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
The embodiments of the present invention are directed towards an osteotomy plate and a template for performing an osteotomy. The osteotomy plate as described herein is particularly applicable to a slide osteotomy operation, and more specifically it is adapted for a canine humeral osteotomy operation. It has been observed by the inventors herein that following 4 and 8 mm sliding osteotomies, mean forces on proximal articular surface of the ulna are reduced by approximately 25% and 28%, respectively. The proximal articular surface of the ulna contributes significantly to load transfer through the canine elbow joint. Abnormalities, which significantly increase this load, may contribute to canine elbow dysplasia, specifically fragmentation of the medial coronoid process and osteochondritis dissecans of the medial aspect of the humeral condyle. The overall reduction in mean joint surface force across the proximal articular surface of the ulna following humeral slide osteotomy indicates that this technique can provide a viable option in the clinical setting to reduce force transfer within the medial aspect of the elbow joint in cases of medial compartmental osteoarthritis of the canine elbow joint.
It should be realized that the width of the plate 100 is variable depending upon the size of the bone screw(s) which are to be used with the plate. Furthermore, the length of the plate is also variable depending upon the number of screws which are to be used with the plate.
In addition to the novel features described above, another novel feature of plate 200 is that the one or more, or all of the holes 202 and 212 are threaded so as to accept locking screws. The locking-type bone screws thread into the plate 200 as well as the bone. The locking screw hole(s) are designed to work with different designs of locking screws. Conventional (e.g., nonlocking) bone screws are compressed against the plate 200 but do not lock or thread into the plate. Threading the bone screw into the bone plate as well as into the bone increases the stiffness of the construct (i.e., the combination of bone and implants). The increased stiffness increases the rate of bone healing and the decreases the risk of complications.
It should be realized that the width of the plate 200 is variable depending upon the size of the bone screw (s) which are to be used with the plate. Furthermore, the length of the plate is also variable depending upon the number of screws which are to be used with the plate.
The device 300 includes a generally rectangular-shaped piece of stainless steel, titanium or other nonreactive material. The overall length of template 300 is configured to match the overall length of the osteotomy plate 100, 200 and 400. In general, the size of the template varies with the size of the corresponding osteotomy plate. Near either end 302 of the template 300 is a round hole 304 sized to accept a bone screw. The hole size varies depending upon the size of the bone screws being used (e.g., 2.7 mm, 3.5 mm, 4.5 mm, and so on). Near the center of the template is a transverse gap 306 in the template. The gap width varies depending upon the thickness of the saw blade being used to perform the osteotomy. The area of the template on either side of the gap 306 are connected by flares of material 308 that bridge the osteotomy gap 306 without impeding the oscillation of the bone saw. The gap between the flares 308 is approximately the same dimension as the gap as the base of the template. The gap 306 ensures that the osteotomy is performed approximately perpendicular to the bone plate and the bone.
The template 300 enables its user to pre-drill the bone to eliminate the risk of rotation of the osteomized bone segments. The position of the screw holes stabilizes the template while preparing bone holes that will enable dynamic compression when the corresponding slide osteotomy plate is applied to the bone. The flares 308 and the gap 306 near the center of the template ensure that the osteotomy is performed perpendicular to the bone plate and the bone. The resulting accurate osteotomy and compression increase the stability of the resulting composite structure (i.e., plate and screws) increasing the rate of healing and decreasing the risk of complication and failure. The accurate positioning of the screw holes reduces or eliminates the risk of rotational malalignment diminishing the risk of mal-union.
The width of the bone plate is variable depending upon the size of the bone screws that are used with the plate. The length of the plate is also variable depending upon the number of screws that are used with the plate. The size of the hole 402 depends upon the size of bone screw being used to secure the plate to the bone.
As is shown in
The locking screw holes are designed to work with different designs of locking screws. Locking screws thread into the bone plate as well as into the bone. Threading the screws into the bone plate as well as into the bone increases the stiffness of the construct (i.e. the combination of bone and implants—(i.e., plate and screws). The increased stiffness increases the rate of bone healing and decreases the risk of complications.
Various other aspects of the overlapping holes 402 of plate 400 are described in further detail in International Patent Application No. PCT/IB2004/000911 and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/809,034, the disclosures of which are herein incorporated by reference in their entireties for all purposes, not inconsistent with the present application. These other aspects include details related to various alternative embodiments, describing: the number of overlapping holes (e.g., two or more) in a given hole: holes formed normal to the top side of the plate or formed at an angle to the top side of the plate; overlapping holes arranged along a longitudinal axis of the bone plate or staggered along the longitudinal axis: the degree of countersink: and kits having the stepped bone plate in combination with bone screws.
As will be understood by those skilled in the art, other equivalent or alternative devices and templates for performing a slide osteotomy according to the embodiments of the present invention can be envisioned without departing from the essential characteristics thereof. For example, the osteotomy plate or the template may be made in various sizes depending on the size of the bone and the desired osteotomy procedure. Furthermore, the osteotomy plate may have any number of threaded or nonthreaded dynamic compression, noncompression-type, or overlapping holes. Accordingly, the foregoing disclosure is intended to be illustrative, but not limiting, of the scope of the invention which is set forth in the following claims.
The present application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/730,462, filed Oct. 25, 2005, which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety for all purposes. The present application is a continuation of International Patent Application No. PCT/US2006/006620, filed Feb. 23, 2006 and a continuation-in-part application of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/809,034 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,722,653, filed Mar. 25, 2004, the disclosures of which are herein incorporated by reference in their entireties for all purposes, not inconsistent with the present application.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2486303 | Longfellow | Oct 1949 | A |
2699774 | Livingston | Jan 1955 | A |
3552389 | Allgover et al. | Jan 1971 | A |
3659595 | Haboush | May 1972 | A |
3716050 | Johnston | Feb 1973 | A |
3779240 | Kondo | Dec 1973 | A |
3824995 | Getscher et al. | Jul 1974 | A |
3842825 | Wagner | Oct 1974 | A |
RE28841 | Allgower et al. | Jun 1976 | E |
4120298 | Fixel | Oct 1978 | A |
4219015 | Steinemann | Aug 1980 | A |
4297993 | Harle | Nov 1981 | A |
4403606 | Woo et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
4408601 | Wenk | Oct 1983 | A |
4409973 | Neufeld | Oct 1983 | A |
4421112 | Mains et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4454876 | Mears | Jun 1984 | A |
RE31628 | Allgower et al. | Jul 1984 | E |
4493317 | Klaue | Jan 1985 | A |
4498601 | Fort | Feb 1985 | A |
4501268 | Comparetto | Feb 1985 | A |
4502474 | Comparetto | Mar 1985 | A |
4503848 | Caspar et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
4509511 | Neufeld | Apr 1985 | A |
4513744 | Klaue | Apr 1985 | A |
4524765 | de Zbikowski | Jun 1985 | A |
4545876 | McGivern, Jr. | Oct 1985 | A |
4565191 | Slocum | Jan 1986 | A |
4565193 | Streli | Jan 1986 | A |
4611581 | Steffee | Sep 1986 | A |
4662891 | Noiles | May 1987 | A |
4677973 | Slocum | Jul 1987 | A |
4696290 | Steffee | Sep 1987 | A |
4762122 | Slocum | Aug 1988 | A |
4790297 | Luque | Dec 1988 | A |
4794918 | Wolter | Jan 1989 | A |
4800874 | David et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4838252 | Klaue | Jun 1989 | A |
4867144 | Karas et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4875475 | Comte et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4887595 | Heinig et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4957479 | Roemer | Sep 1990 | A |
4957496 | Schmidt | Sep 1990 | A |
4957497 | Hoogland et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4959065 | Arnett et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4988350 | Herzberg | Jan 1991 | A |
5002544 | Klaue et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5006120 | Carter | Apr 1991 | A |
5015248 | Burstein et al. | May 1991 | A |
5041113 | Biedermann et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5042983 | Rayhack | Aug 1991 | A |
5085660 | Lin | Feb 1992 | A |
5087260 | Fixel | Feb 1992 | A |
5209751 | Farris et al. | May 1993 | A |
5216941 | Kolvereid | Jun 1993 | A |
5232249 | Kolvereid | Aug 1993 | A |
5261910 | Warden et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5275601 | Gogolewski et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5304180 | Slocum | Apr 1994 | A |
5324290 | Zdeblick et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5364399 | Lowery et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5429641 | Gotfried | Jul 1995 | A |
5487741 | Maruyama et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5601553 | Trebing et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5681311 | Foley et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5709686 | Talos et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5733287 | Tepic et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5741258 | Klaue et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5810823 | Klaue et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5851207 | Cesarone | Dec 1998 | A |
5904684 | Rooks | May 1999 | A |
5921988 | Legrand | Jul 1999 | A |
5968047 | Reed | Oct 1999 | A |
5976141 | Haag et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5997541 | Schenk | Dec 1999 | A |
6048344 | Schenk | Apr 2000 | A |
6096060 | Fitts et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6183475 | Lester et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6206881 | Frigg et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6309393 | Tepic et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6331179 | Freid et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6358250 | Orbay | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6406478 | Kuo | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6533786 | Needham et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6605090 | Trieu et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6623486 | Weaver et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6669701 | Steiner et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6719759 | Wagner et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6767351 | Orbay et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6821278 | Frigg et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
7008427 | Sevrain | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7048739 | Konieczynski | May 2006 | B2 |
7063701 | Michelson | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7090676 | Huebner et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7354441 | Frigg | Apr 2008 | B2 |
20020045901 | Wagner et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020156474 | Wack et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020183752 | Steiner et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030040748 | Aikins et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20040026029 | Martin et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040167522 | Niederberger et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040181228 | Wagner et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040193164 | Orbay | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040193165 | Orbay | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050010226 | Grady et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050049594 | Wack et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050065524 | Orbay | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050080421 | Weaver et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050216008 | Zwirnmann et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050216009 | Michelson | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050245931 | Orbay | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050251138 | Boris et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060009771 | Orbay et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060212035 | Wotton, III | Sep 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
02 07 884 | Mar 1909 | DE |
2340880 | Apr 1975 | DE |
28 06 414 | Oct 1978 | DE |
43 41 980 | Jun 1995 | DE |
43 43 117 | Jun 1995 | DE |
0 100 114 | Feb 1984 | EP |
0 355 035 | Feb 1990 | EP |
2 472 373 | Jul 1981 | FR |
2480106 | Oct 1981 | FR |
2 556 583 | Jun 1985 | FR |
2 606 268 | May 1988 | FR |
2674118 | Sep 1992 | FR |
WO 0053110 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO 0053111 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO 0119267 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 0154601 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 0157834 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 0200127 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO 02096309 | Dec 2002 | WO |
WO 2004084701 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO 2004089233 | Oct 2004 | WO |
2005032386 | Apr 2005 | WO |
2005041796 | May 2005 | WO |
WO2005117732 | Dec 2005 | WO |
2006014391 | Feb 2006 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080039851 A1 | Feb 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60730462 | Oct 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/US2006/006620 | Feb 2006 | US |
Child | 11552585 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10809034 | Mar 2004 | US |
Child | PCT/US2006/006620 | US |