The present disclosure relates generally to information handling systems, and more particularly to an energy efficient method to wake a host system for charging battery powered portable devices via bus powered external i/o ports.
As the value and use of information continues to increase, individuals and businesses seek additional ways to process and store information. One option is an information handling system (IHS). An IHS generally processes, compiles, stores, and/or communicates information or data for business, personal, or other purposes. Because technology and information handling needs and requirements may vary between different applications, IHSs may also vary regarding what information is handled, how the information is handled, how much information is processed, stored, or communicated, and how quickly and efficiently the information may be processed, stored, or communicated. The variations in IHSs allow for IHSs to be general or configured for a specific user or specific use such as financial transaction processing, airline reservations, enterprise data storage, or global communications. In addition, IHSs may include a variety of hardware and software components that may be configured to process, store, and communicate information and may include one or more computer systems, data storage systems, and networking systems.
With the proliferation of small, battery powered electronic peripheral devices, such as digital cameras, music players, mobile telephones, and a variety of other small electronic devices, there is a need for recharging the batteries for these devices. One way to recharge the batteries of these devices may be to charge the batteries from a larger capacity battery, such as the battery for a portable or notebook-type IHS. Typically, when the IHS is not being used, or is not plugged in to a power source, the IHS is put into an advanced configuration and power interface (ACPI) deep sleep mode known as G3. This time of non-use for the IHS may be when the user wishes to charge the batteries of the peripheral device. In order to support charging the peripheral device, the IHS should wake to ACPI S5. This can be a large drain on the IHS battery and therefore, an efficient system and method for waking the IHS from the G3 mode and maintaining long battery life is desirable.
Accordingly, it would be desirable to provide an energy efficient method to wake a host system for charging battery powered portable devices via bus powered external i/o ports.
According to one embodiment, optimized bus powered peripheral battery charging includes a circuit to initiate a change in an advanced configuration and power interface (ACPI) state in a controller allowing charging of a peripheral device battery, the circuit including a signal converter coupled between an input port and the controller to sense when the peripheral device battery is coupled to an input port and to restrict the controller from changing ACPI state multiple times for a given peripheral device battery coupling; and a ground loop detector coupled in parallel to the signal converter between the input port and the controller to allow the controller to know that the peripheral device battery has maintained being coupled to the input port.
For purposes of this disclosure, an IHS 100 includes any instrumentality or aggregate of instrumentalities operable to compute, classify, process, transmit, receive, retrieve, originate, switch, store, display, manifest, detect, record, reproduce, handle, or utilize any form of information, intelligence, or data for business, scientific, control, or other purposes. For example, an IHS 100 may be a personal computer, a network storage device, or any other suitable device and may vary in size, shape, performance, functionality, and price. The IHS 100 may include random access memory (RAM), one or more processing resources such as a central processing unit (CPU) or hardware or software control logic, read only memory (ROM), and/or other types of nonvolatile memory. Additional components of the IHS 100 may include one or more disk drives, one or more network ports for communicating with external devices as well as various input and output (I/O) devices, such as a keyboard, a mouse, and a video display. The IHS 100 may also include one or more buses operable to transmit communications between the various hardware components.
Other resources can also be coupled to the system through the memory I/O hub 104 using a data bus, including an optical drive 114 or other removable-media drive, one or more hard disk drives 116, one or more network interfaces 118, one or more Universal Serial Bus (USB) ports 120, and a super I/O controller 122 to provide access to user input devices 124, etc. The IHS 100 may also include a solid state drive (SSDs) 126 in place of, or in addition to main memory 108, the optical drive 114, and/or a hard disk drive 116. It is understood that any or all of the drive devices 114, 116, and 126 may be located locally with the IHS 100, located remotely from the IHS 100, and/or they may be virtual with respect to the IHS 100.
Also shown in
Not all IHSs 100 include each of the components shown in
An IHS 100 may allow charging of a peripheral device battery via a USB port 120 when the IHS 100 system is in what is commonly known in the art as an Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) S5 power state. ACPI power states are generally known as an open industry standard allowing a combination of operating system (OS) control and/or basic input output system (BIOS) control of power management for the IHS 100. The ACPI states allow the IHS 100 to adjust to higher or lower performance states depending on system demand. Using the ACPI states, the IHS 100 may be put into extremely low power consumption states. From these states, the controller 122 and/or the IHS 100 may be quickly awakened by general purpose events, such as, interrupts, the clock, the keyboard, a modem, and/or a variety of other events. When a notebook-type IHS 100 is powered off, with only battery power inserted, (e.g., not plugged in) the IHS 100 may be set to the ACPI G3 power state, which consumes almost no power, and thus maintains a long battery life. However, supporting the USB charging feature on an IHS 100 poses a problem of how to wake from ACPI G3 state to ACPI S5 state to allow charging of the peripheral device battery and how to best manage the power states to maximize battery life. It should be understood that any state change may be utilized with the present disclosure.
In an embodiment, a peripheral device battery may be charged via the USB port 120 while the IHS 100 is in ACPI S5 state. A controller 122 (e.g., an embedded controller) in the IHS 100 may “wake-up” via power switch inputs, when a user presses the power switch button, but previous disclosures for this are limited to waking up the controller 122 and then allowing the controller 122 to decide if the IHS 100 system should wake up. In addition, using a power switch input that is connected directly to a connector ground loop detection circuit can cause a large drain on a coin cell battery or other power source used to power the ACPI G3 circuitry in the controller 122. Thus, there is no previous system and method defined for a device that uses a connector detect to wake the system, such as the USB connector port 120.
The signal converter 130 generally enables the controller 122 to monitor the port 120 (e.g., a USB port) for device insertion (e.g., for charging a peripheral device battery) by transforming a high to low DC transition, seen upon insertion to the port 120 into high to low pulse of limited duration so that the controller 122 can recognize the signal through an input, such as, a power switch input on the controller 122, as a valid power switch input assertion according to its specifications while ensuring that the controller 122 is not damaged. The ground loop detector 132 generally enables the controller to monitor the port 120 during ACPI S5, when the controller logic is operational, for example through a general purpose input on the controller 122 because the signal converter 130 limits the power switch input from being used to do so.
During operation of an embodiment as illustrated in
The components of the signal converter 130 (capacitor 140 and resistors 142, 144, and 150) may be chosen to “tune” the signal converter such that the signal it provides to the controller will allow the controller to recognize a single insertion event into port 120 while the system is in a G3 state.
The circuit allows the controller 122 to wake the system from G3 in order to charge a peripheral device from the USB Port in S5 with no other power rails turned on. As is standard in the industry, the charging signal to charge the peripheral device via the port 120 controls a charging power source (not shown). After the falling edge has been converted to the signal that wakes the controller 122, the capacitor 140 charges back up on the side opposite the port 120 such that the power switch input on the controller 122 is held high. This limits the Controller 122 from waking more than once from a given insertion of a device in the port 120. This may be a problem which occurs if the capacitor 140 is not in the circuit. When the device is removed from the port 120, the capacitor 140 quickly discharges until the charge on both sides of the capacitor 140 are again held high such that another device insertion in the USB Port causing another falling edge will wake the controller 122 (e.g., the system is again “armed”.)
In an embodiment of the present disclosure, a DC blocking capacitor 140 is used to transform the falling edge on the controller 122 power switch input that is caused by a USB connector insertion to the port 120. The falling edge should be sufficiently long to wake the controller 122 once, but after that time the capacitor 140 will begin charging back up to hold the power switch input high. This will prevent the controller 140 from waking more than once from a given insertion of a USB device, and will thus save battery life and prevent hysteresis behavior. When the USB connector is removed, the capacitor 140 will discharge, and the power switch will once again be “armed” to wake the system. In an embodiment, a run-time (S5 or greater) general purpose input (GPI) on the controller 122 will also be connected to the USB connector ground loop detector 132 in parallel. This input will allow the controller 122 to know at run time (S5 or greater) that a device is still connected, because the DC blocking capacitor 140 will prevent the power switch input from being used for this purpose. Thus, the GPI may enable code to allow different behaviors for AC vs. battery power, allow more complicated watchdog timer decision trees, power down as soon as a device is disconnected, and a variety of other features. In another embodiment, the GPI may allow the controller 122 to set a timer that may automatically return the system to fully off (ACPI G3). This may be very useful because the DC blocking capacitor 140 can prevent further wake events via the power switch input of the controller 122.
Although illustrative embodiments have been shown and described, a wide range of modification, change and substitution is contemplated in the foregoing disclosure and in some instances, some features of the embodiments may be employed without a corresponding use of other features. Accordingly, it is appropriate that the appended claims be construed broadly and in a manner consistent with the scope of the embodiments disclosed herein.
The present application claims priority to and is a continuation of co-owned, co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/110,766 filed Apr. 28, 2008, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4126765 | Calder | Nov 1978 | A |
4583034 | Martin | Apr 1986 | A |
5153558 | Robinson et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5650669 | Aldous | Jul 1997 | A |
5818201 | Stockstad et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5970428 | Brennan | Oct 1999 | A |
6189108 | Cromer et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6222347 | Gong | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6266776 | Sakai | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6331744 | Chen et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6380714 | Chou | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6523122 | Moon | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6774604 | Matsuda et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6782491 | Foedlmeier et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6820206 | Kim et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6946817 | Fischer et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7058832 | Sachs | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7082543 | Lin | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7170259 | Veseli | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7171569 | Ohishi et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7240227 | Maezawa | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7296164 | Breen et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7296171 | Hahn et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7321974 | Anderson et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7437578 | Menzl | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7437586 | Cornelius | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7570015 | Bansal et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7631205 | Sakemoto et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7689851 | Sawyers et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7793115 | Tipley et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
20020157039 | Ihara | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020162036 | Kim et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030159076 | Delisle et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030221135 | Motoe et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040063464 | Akram et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040158751 | Lam et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040187042 | Kawanabe | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20060035527 | Numano | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060117195 | Niwa et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070101172 | Ohyama | May 2007 | A1 |
20070124604 | Feldstein et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20080229121 | Lassa et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080294923 | Barake et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090217065 | Araujo, Jr. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090271644 | Fiebrich et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100100752 | Chueh et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100128632 | Mantysalo | May 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
01085539 | Mar 1989 | JP |
04150625 | May 1992 | JP |
2000165478 | Jun 2000 | JP |
2000278948 | Oct 2000 | JP |
2005005009 | Jan 2005 | JP |
2006187113 | Jul 2006 | JP |
2008278570 | Nov 2008 | JP |
Entry |
---|
Benini, L.; Macii, A.; Macii, E.; Poncino, M.; Scarsi, R.; “Scheduling battery usage in mobile systems,” Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 11, No. 6, pp. 1136-1143, Dec. 2003. |
Buennemeyer, T.K.; Nelson, T.M.; Marchany, R.C.; Tront, J.G.; “Polling the smart battery for efficiency: Lifetime optimization in battery-sensing intrusion protection systems,” SoutheastCon, 2007. Proceedings. IEEE, pp. 740-745, Mar. 22-25, 2007. |
Kularatna, N.; “Rechargeable batteries and their management,” Instrumentation & Measurement Magazine, IEEE, vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 20-23, Apr. 2011. |
Ying-Wen Bai; Hsiu-Chen Chen;, “Design and Implementation of Low-Power Tablet PCs,” Sep. 11, 2006, Consumer Electronics, 2006. ISCE '06. 2006 IEEE Tenth International Symposium on, pp. 1-6. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120005502 A1 | Jan 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12110766 | Apr 2008 | US |
Child | 13223871 | US |