This application is a National Stage of International patent application PCT/EP2013/072478, filed on Oct. 28, 2013, which claims priority to foreign French patent application No. FR 1202935, filed on Oct. 31, 2012, the disclosures of which are incorporated by reference in their entirety.
The field of the invention is that of the solid state laser sources for scientific, industrial, medical and military applications. More specifically, it is used very advantageously for amplifying medium materials (such as a crystal) which have a relatively small thickness, compared to their aperture along the axis of propagation of the laser beam, typically less than 1:3.
The technology of pumping lasers has evolved substantially in recent years and it is now becoming possible to have a pulsed laser source which gives an average pumping power in the order of a hundred or so watts and a thermal deposition in the crystal of the same order of magnitude.
Various solutions have been implemented to resolve the problem of extraction of the thermal energy in the crystal:
These configurations exhibit drawbacks, notably in terms of costs, footprint and vibrations.
In the lasers of high average power (>10 watts), these solutions are not satisfactory and a rear face cooling is used.
An exemplary multipass amplification device configuration implementing a cooling of the amplifying medium 1 by a rear cooling (illustrated by the arrow) is illustrated in
The cooling can be obtained by means of a fluid, liquid or gas, or a solid. This cooling by the rear face makes it possible to increase the heat exchange surface area. Moreover, it makes it possible to generate a thermal gradient in the direction of propagation of the laser in the crystal, and thus to achieve a high thermal extraction. The index variations linked to the temperature variations in the crystal are gradients mostly oriented in the same direction as the direction of propagation of the laser beam. However, there then arises a problem of temporal contrast which was not encountered in the preceding solutions. The temporal contrast is defined by the ratio between the intensity of the main pulse and the foot of the pulse and/or any parasitic pulses.
Consequently, there is still, today, a need for an amplification device that simultaneously gives satisfaction to all the abovementioned requirements, in terms of cooling and of temporal contrast.
More specifically, the subject of the invention is a device for amplifying a multi-wavelength pulsed laser beam, which comprises:
It is mainly characterized in that the front face of the medium is tilted relative to its rear face by a first non-zero tilt and in that it further comprises a trapezoidal prism of refractive index n2, with an input face and an output face which form between them a second non-zero tilt, situated at a location intended to be on the path of the beam reflected by the rear face and refracted by the front face of the amplifying medium (that is to say the beam at the output of the amplifying medium after having passed through it, also called amplified beam), the first and second tilts being such that the beams of each wavelength are parallel to one another at the output of the prism.
Thus, after propagation in the amplifying medium, the parasitic reflections are separated spatially from the main pulse and the temporal contrast is no longer degraded by the parasitic reflections.
Preferably, n1>>(n1−1)/v1, v1 being the constringence of the amplifying medium. The aim of this is to preserve the multi-wavelength nature of the beam at the output of the prism.
According to a feature of the invention, the front face of the amplifying medium being intended to receive the incident beam and reflect a so-called parasitic beam, the prism is situated outside the path of this parasitic beam, that is to say at a distance from the amplifying medium where the parasitic beam is separated from the incident beam.
According to another feature of the invention, the front face of the amplifying medium can be anti-reflection coated. Optionally, a filtering screen is situated at a location intended to be on the path of the parasitic beam.
The amplifying medium is, for example, a crystal or a glass or a polymer.
The beam to be amplified typically has an average power greater than 10 W.
Other features and advantages of the invention will become apparent on reading the following detailed description, given as a nonlimiting example and with reference to the attached drawings in which:
From one figure to another, the same elements are identified by the same references.
In the two amplification solutions described in the preamble, the laser beam to be amplified passes through the crystal by entering on one side and leaving on the other side, and the parasitic beam, because of the parasitic reflections at the air/crystal interfaces, then travels along a longer optical path. The pre-pulse contrast is then not degraded because the parasitic pulses (=parasitic beam) arrive after the main pulse (=amplified beam).
The laser amplification devices with cooling by the rear face require a geometrical folding of the beam because of the reflecting rear face, such that the output face of the crystal is the same as the input face, which means that the parasitic pulses (due to the parasitic reflections on the front face) are located ahead of the main pulse, consequently degrading the temporal contrast of the pulse.
To avoid this degradation, the air/crystal interface is modified to separate the main pulse and the parasitic pulses: a slight angle is given to the input face of the amplifying crystal, this input face thus forming a tilt with the rear face. Thus, after propagation, the parasitic pulses are separated spatially from the main pulse.
As can be seen in
Similarly, as can be seen in
Since it concerns a multi-wavelength laser source, the angle β′1 (respectively β″1) that the faces 12 and 11 form in the plane xOz (respectively, the plane yOz), produces a prismatic effect which, after passage through the amplifying medium 1, produces an angular separation of the main pulse 6 as a function of each of its wavelengths. In
So that, at the output of the prism 4, the beams of each wavelength are parallel to one another, there is the following condition of achromatization between the angle β′1 (respectively β″1) of the faces of the amplifying medium 1 and the angle β′2 (respectively β″2) of the faces of the compensation prism 4:
(2β′1Δn1)=(β′2Δn2) and respectively (2β″1Δn1)=(β″2Δn2)
with vi being the constringence, λc the central wavelength, λmin and λmax being the spectral limits of the incident beam 2, and n2 being the refractive index of the prism 4.
In these formulae, it is assumed that the beams are propagated in air or vacuum.
The front face 12 of the amplifying medium is advantageously anti-reflection coated. There can nevertheless remain a residue.
Preferably, the prism 4 is arranged at a distance L from the amplifying medium 1, where the parasitic beam 5 and the incident beam 2 are spatially separated, that is to say do not exhibit any overlap between them. More specifically, L is the distance between the prism and the amplifying medium, projected onto the axis Oz at right angles to the face 12 of the prism 1.
This separation is obtained for L such that:
L>φ/tan(2θi) and L>φ/tan(2φi).
Preferably also, L is chosen such that the amplified beam 6 and the parasitic beam 5 are spatially separated. The plane xOz is then preferentially used to “eject” the parasitic pulses with therefore β″1=0. The projection β′1 of the angle β1 in the plane xOz is equal to β1 whereas the projection β″1 of the angle β1 in the plane yOz is zero. It is then possible to choose a zero angle of incidence (θi=0) as in the numerical example below.
The prism 4 must of course not mask the incident beam 2. Preferably also, L is chosen such that the amplified beam 6, incident beam 2 and parasitic beams 5 are spatially separated. This separation is obtained for L such that:
L>φ/tan(2(θi+β′1n1)) or L>φ/tan(2(φi+β″1n1)).
On the prism 4, the spectral components of the incident beam 6 form a spot of diameter φ+Δφ. It will be noted that Δφ includes the increase in the diameter introduced by the divergence of the beam in the double passage through the prism 1 then that introduced by the divergence of the beam on the path between the output face 12 of the prism 1 and the prism 4; the same diameter φ+Δφ is obtained at the output of this correcting prism 4. To preserve the multi-wavelength nature of the output beam, it is desired for the widening Δφ of the diameter of the amplified beam 6 to be small compared to φ.
Such is the case because:
Now, the following still applies
because n1>>(n1−1)/v1, which means that Δφ<<φ.
For the case, for example, of a sapphire crystal doped with titanium ions Ti3+, the following apply:
The widening Δφ of the beam amplified over the 750 nm to 850 nm band has the value:
Δφ=Lmin·tan(2β1Δn1)≈Lmin·10−4,
to be compared with
φ=Lmin·tan(2·(θi+β1n1))≈Lmin·6.10−2.
The following is then obtained:
Δφ/φ≈0,16.10−2.
After the correcting prism 4, the different wavelengths thus cease to be spatially separated. Given the optomechanical margins to be taken into account, the lateral shift Δφ is rather in the order of 1 tenth of the diameter φ of the amplified beam. The phenomenon is in any case negligible because Δφ<<φ.
The beam to be amplified is typically an IR beam, without this being limiting.
As indicated in the examples, the amplifying medium 1 can be a crystal such as sapphire doped with titanium, or Yb:YAG, Yb:CaF2 or a polymer material, or a glass or any other material in the solid state. The material of the prism 4 can be the same as that of the amplifying medium 1; in this case n1=n2.
The amplification device according to the invention is preferably a multipass device, but not necessarily.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
12 02935 | Oct 2012 | FR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2013/072478 | 10/28/2013 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2014/067888 | 5/8/2014 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6834064 | Paschotta | Dec 2004 | B1 |
20020118721 | Bittenson | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030012230 | Hopkins | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20060153257 | Franjic | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060176926 | Ludewigt et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060193358 | Alfano | Aug 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102004009593 | Sep 2005 | DE |
0143242 | Jun 2001 | WO |
2006081175 | Aug 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
R. L. Fork et al., “Negative dispersion using pairs of prisms”, Optics Letters, vol. 9, 150-152, 1984. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150303642 A1 | Oct 2015 | US |