The invention relates to a device for analyzing the gait of a person, and more particularly to a device suitable for identifying instants and phases that are characteristic of the gait of said person.
In particular, a device of the invention makes it possible to determine automatically the support and the flight phases for each swing of the gait. It also makes it possible to count the number of swings and as a result to estimate the cadence of the gait.
This information presents medical and paramedical interest, particularly in podology, for clinical descriptive analysis of gait and to enable functional electrical stimulation to be triggered.
The article by K. Aminian et al. entitled “Spatio-temporal parameters of gait measured by an ambulatory system using miniature gyroscopes”, Journal of Biomechanics 35 (2000), pages 689-699, describes a method of analyzing gait that makes use of at least one gyroscope fastened to a person's “shank” or tibial segment. A comparison with signals acquired by pressure-sensitive switches fastened to the heel and to the big toe shows that measuring the angular velocity of the tibial segment, as performed by means of a gyroscope, makes it possible to identify two characteristic instants of the swing: the moment when the toe leaves the ground (TO, for “toe-off”), and the moment when the heel strikes the ground (HS, for “heel-strike”). The period lying between the instants TO and HS corresponds to the flight phase of the swing for the leg under consideration; conversely, the period extending between the instants HS and TO corresponds to the support phase.
The drawback of the device proposed by K. Aminian et al. is associated with using gyroscopes, which are devices that are relatively bulky (and therefore uncomfortable for the person) and that consume a large amount of electricity.
The use of pressure-sensitive switches, also disclosed in the above-mentioned article, gives information only about the support phase and not about the flight phase of the swing.
Document EP 1 721 573 describes a method of estimating the phase of the movement of an object, which method includes acquiring experimental data from measuring physical magnitudes by means of at least one sensor. In particular, that document mentions determining the heel strike (HS instant) by analyzing an acceleration signal. The main drawback of that method is its computational complexity. Furthermore, accelerometers are sensitive to the inseparable combination of acceleration due to gravity and acceleration of the sensor. This presents high frequency components that make it difficult to determine the direction of acceleration due to gravity.
The article by S. Bonnet and R. Héliot entitled “A magnetometer-based approach for studying human movements”, published in IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, Vol. 54, No. 7, July 2007, pages 1353-1355, describes a method making it possible to study the inclination of the torso with the help of magnetometers. In particular, by assuming that motion is planar, it is possible to determine the angle formed by the torso relative to the vertical. Nevertheless, the processing of the data is complex (minimizing a cost function relative to two variables). In addition, the document does not give any indication on how it might be possible to use the information as obtained in that way to identify instants and phases that are characteristic of a person's gait.
Document FR 2 895 499 describes a method of measuring the orientation of a solid with the help of a magnetometer, and also an application thereof to determining the orientation of the thigh and the tibia of a leg while walking, from which it is possible to deduce the angle of the knee. Identifying instants and/or phases that are characteristic of gait is neither described nor suggested.
The article by R. Héliot et al. entitled “Continuous identification of gait phase for robotics and rehabilitation using microsensors”, published in Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Robotics, 2005—ICAR '05, describes a method of determining gait phases from orientation measurements of the tibia and of the thigh performed with the help of respective sensors, comprising accelerometers and magnetometers, which method requires complex data processing.
The invention seeks to solve at least some of the drawbacks of the prior art by providing a gait analysis device that is simple in terms of its mechanical structure and in terms of the data processing method it implements.
Advantageously, the device of the invention is simple and flexible to use, since it makes use of the Earth's magnetic field, which is naturally available everywhere. The person need not necessarily walk in a determined direction, nor even in a straight line.
Magnetometers are sensors of small dimensions that consume little electricity, so wearing the device of the invention presents little discomfort.
In accordance with the invention, at least one of the above-mentioned objects can be achieved with the help of a device for analyzing the gait of a person, wherein the device comprises:
According to particular embodiments of the invention:
The invention also provides the use of a device as defined above to identify instants and phases that are characteristic of a person's gait, said person being immersed solely in the Earth's magnetic field and said magnetometer being fastened to a tibial segment of said person with an orientation that is at least approximately known relative to the person's sagittal plane.
Other characteristics, details, and advantages of the invention appear on reading the description made with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
In the graphs of
As shown in
The measurement axes of the magnetometer M3 are assumed to be mutually orthogonal and they are identified by references VT, AP, and ML. The axis VT (for “vertical”) is parallel to the tibial segment, and is oriented downwards; in spite of its name, it does not remain vertical while the person is walking. The axis AP (for “antero-posterior”) is oriented towards the front, while the axis ML (for “medio-lateral”) is oriented laterally. While walking, it can be assumed that the axis ML remains horizontal and lies in the frontal plane PF of the person's body, while the axes AP and VT turn in the sagittal plane PS.
The anatomical planes of the human body (horizontal plane PH; frontal plane PF; sagittal plane PS), and the vertical, sagittal, and transverse axes AV, AS, and AT are shown in
The invention is not limited to circumstances in which the ambient magnetic field is the Earth's magnetic field; nevertheless, that constitutes a preferred implementation of the invention since the magnetic field is present everywhere, and is substantially uniform at the scale at which the invention is implemented, with its inclination being known, at least approximately.
The magnetic field CM points to magnetic north (by definition of magnetic north), and forms an angle κ with the axis X. The inclination κ of the magnetic field CM relative to the horizontal depends on location (and is about 60° in France), but it may be considered as being constant, locally. Assuming that its magnitude is normalized as 1, the magnetic field CM is expressed in the inertial frame of reference XYZ as follows:
The magnetic field CM may also be expressed in the moving frame of reference of the sensor (AP, ML, VT). In
In
In the plane (Z, ξ), the vector CMS may be expressed as follows:
The norm ρ1 of this vector depends both on κ and on the heading of the walker, θ1.
While walking, the axes AP and VT of the magnetometer turn in the sagittal plane, while the axis ML remains stationary and perpendicular to said plane. Let θ2 be the angle of inclination of the person's tibial segment relative to the vertical, or equivalently, the angle between the axis VT and the vertical, or the angle lying between the axis AP and the horizontal. A convention is used whereby the angle θ2 is positive when the tibial segment is oriented rearwards (i.e., in particular, at instant “TO” when the toe leaves the ground).
In completely general manner, the vector CMS (projection onto the sagittal plane of the Earth's magnetic field) can be expressed by its components along the axes of the magnetometer, hAP and hVT, or in polar coordinates (ρ2, φ2), as follows:
The phase φ2 of the expression for the vector CMS In polar coordinates is defined in such a manner that φ2=0 when it is oriented parallel to the axis of the tibial segment, i.e. when the vector CMS is parallel to the axis VT. In other words, φ2 represents the angle formed by the projection onto the sagittal plane PS of the ambient magnetic field CM relative to the axis VT.
The second of these equations shows that the phase φ2 is equal to the angle of the tibial segment θ1 plus an offset φ1 that depends on κ and on the heading θ1 of the walker. Since κ is uniform locally, if the person is walking in a straight line (constant heading), then the offset φ1 is constant.
The idea on which the invention is based is that knowing the angle φ2 and how it varies in time makes it possible to determine the characteristic instants and phases of gait, even if the heading of the walker is not constant.
It can be seen that the plots of {dot over (φ)}2(t) and of {dot over (φ)}2f(t) are very similar to the plot of the angular speed of the tibial segment as reproduced in the above-mentioned article by K. Aminian et al. It is thus possible to identify remarkable points of the curve {dot over (φ)}2f(t) (which is easier to use than {dot over (φ)}2(t) since the curve is smoother) and to associate them with the instants TO and HS that split up the gait cycle. These remarkable points are the maximum points of {dot over (φ)}2f(t); if an opposite time convention is selected, they would then be the minimum points.
Since the maxima of {dot over (φ)}2f(t) are very narrow, the maximum points are very close in time to zero crossings, which in turn correspond to extremum points of the curve representing φ2(t). Consequently, as shown in
Other remarkable instants of gait phase, the mid-swing instant (MSW) and the foot flat (FF) instant can be identified from the curve {dot over (φ)}2f(t). In the time convention used in
At the moment the heel strikes the ground, the leg is practically extended, so the angle of the knee is very small. The foot makes contact (HS), and the knee bends to absorb the impact until the end of the double support phase, the knee reaches a first local flexing maximum, the foot is flat on the ground (instant FF). The leg then extends to apply thrust and the body passes onto the other leg for the second double support phase. During this second double support phase, the knee bends until the toes leave the ground (TO) and continues flexing during the beginning of the oscillating phase so as to enable it to pass in front of the body. The knee then reaches a second local flexing maximum at the mid-swing (MSW) instant.
At instant FF, the foot presses flat against the ground, the tibia is oriented vertically, and the speed and the acceleration of the foot are zero at this instant.
Thus, by having a device as described by the invention on each of an individual's legs, it is possible to know the four characteristic instants (TO, MS, FF, HS) corresponding to each leg, as a function of time. This makes it possible to analyze the gait model well.
Remarkable points can be searched for in φ2(t) or {dot over (φ)}2f(t) automatically by techniques known in the prior art. In general, whatever the sign convention adopted, it is possible to determine MS, FF, TO, and HS from the curve of {dot over (φ)}2f(t), these points correspondingly respectively:
This description is quite universal in the context of normal gait, however there can be variants for pathological gaits.
The curve for {dot over (φ)}2f(t) shows that the gait cycle is periodic, with the period being defined as the time interval between two successive identical characteristic instants.
It can be particularly useful to identify the instant FF in order to determine the heading and the path of the gait. At this instant, the tibial segment of the leg is substantially vertical. Thus, if the axis VT of the accelerometer is in good alignment with said tibial segment, then the two axes AP and ML lie in a horizontal plane and enable the heading of the gait to be determined relative to magnetic north.
In addition, in correspondence with the same instant FF, the acceleration and the speed of the tibial segments are zero. If an auxiliary accelerometer is provided on the tibia, this information serves to calculate the gait path by double integration of the signal delivered by said accelerometer.
In a variant, it is possible to determine at least some characteristic points of gait (HS and TO, and with greater difficulty MSW and FF) directly from the plot of hAP(t). This is because
hAP(t)∝ sin φ2≈φ2
The accuracy of this alternative method is nevertheless not so good. In any event, it is preferable to begin by eliminating the “base line” of the curve representing hAP(t), due to changes of gait heading. This base line is clearly visible in
By providing a second magnetometer secured to the person's thigh, and by applying signal processing equivalent to that described above, it is possible to determine the angle of inclination ψ of the person's femur, to within an offset φ1. Subtracting the femur angle ψ from the angle φ2 of the tibial segment gives the flexing angle γ of the knee. It is advantageous to observe that this subtraction serves to eliminate the offset φ1 directly.
Measuring the knee angle γ (t) is itself advantageous for medical and paramedical purposes. Furthermore, the characteristic instants and phases of gait can also be determined from the plot of γ(t), or from its time derivative, as shown in
In
Another parameter of interest made accessible by the invention is the angle of inclination of the tibial segment relative to the vertical, θ2. In particular, it is useful to know its value (or “angle of attack”) at the moment the heel strikes the ground, HS. Since
θ2=φ2−φ1
and φ1 depends both on θ1 and on κ, which angle is known to a good approximation, it is necessary to determine the heading θ1. A first possibility consists in performing a trignometrical calculation on the component ML of the magnetometer signal:
hML=−sin θ1 cos κ
A variant consists in calculating the arc-tangent of hML/hAP using only signals measured during the support phase, when the tibial segment is approximately perpendicular relative to the ground. This variant presents the advantage of not depending on accurate knowledge of the angle κ.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
08 00571 | Feb 2008 | FR | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6959259 | Vock et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7602301 | Stirling et al. | Oct 2009 | B1 |
20060184276 | Takenaka et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070219744 | Kolen | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070250134 | Miesel et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20090046056 | Rosenberg et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090278791 | Slycke et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 895 499 | Jun 2007 | FR |
2895499 | Jun 2007 | FR |
Entry |
---|
Machine—English—Translation—Stephane—Bonnet—Estimation of the Orientation of an Object, Jun. 29, 2007, EPO, whole document. |
K Aminian; “Spatio-temporal parameters of gait measured by an ambulatory system using miniature gyroscopes”; Dec. 28, 2001; Journal of Biomechanics; 35; p. 689-699. |
R. Héliot, et al., “Continuous Identification of Gait Phase for Robotics and Rehabilitation Using Microsensors”, Advanced Robotics, ICAR '05. Proceedings., 12th International Conference, XP010835347, Jul. 18-20, 2005, pp. 686-691. |
X. Yun, et al., “Self-Contained Position Tracking of Human Movement Using Small Inertial/Magnetic Sensor Modules”, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, XP-002505760, 2007, 2 pages (Derwent Abstract Only). |
K. J. O'Donovan, et al., “An Inertial and Magnetic Sensor Based Technique for Joint Angle Measurement”, Journal of Biomechanics, The Institution of Engineering and Technology, vol. 40, No. 12, XP-002505761, Mar. 7, 2007, 1 page (Derwent Abstract Only). |
Bob Kemp, et al., “Body position can be monitored in 3D using miniature accelerometers and earth-magnetic field sensors”, Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 109, XP-002367000, Dec. 1, 1998, pp. 484-488. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090198155 A1 | Aug 2009 | US |