The present invention relates to a device for beam shaping, including producing a linear intensity distribution in a working plane.
Definitions: In the propagation direction of the laser radiation means average propagation direction of the laser radiation, particularly if the latter is not a plane wave or is at least partly divergent. Light beam, partial beam or beam, unless expressly indicated otherwise, does not mean an idealized beam of geometrical optics, but rather a real light beam, such as a laser beam having a Gaussian profile or a modified Gaussian profile, for example, which does not have an infinitesimally small but rather an extended beam cross section.
Devices of the type mentioned in the introduction are sufficiently known. Typical laser light sources of such devices are Nd-YAG lasers or excimer lasers, for example. By way of example, Nd-YAG lasers not operated as single-mode lasers have a beam quality factor M2 of approximately 8 to 25. The beam quality factor M2 is a measure of the quality of the laser beam. By way of example, a laser beam having a pure Gaussian profile has a beam quality factor M2 of 1. The beam quality factor M2 corresponds approximately to the number of modes of the laser radiation.
The beam quality factor M2 influences the focusability of the laser radiation. For a laser beam having a Gaussian profile, the thickness d or the beam waist in the focal region is proportional to the wavelength λ, of the laser beam to be focused and inversely proportional to the numerical aperture NA of the focusing lens. The following formula therefore holds true for the thickness of the laser beam in the focal region:
In the case of a laser beam which does not have a Gaussian profile or which has a beam quality factor M2 greater than 1, the minimum thickness in the focal region or the beam waist in the focal region is additionally proportional to the beam quality factor in accordance with the following formula:
It is therefore evident that the greater the beam quality factor, the worse laser radiation can be focused. It should be noted at this point that the beam quality factor M2 can have different magnitudes with regard to two directions perpendicular to the propagation direction of the laser radiation. In this case a distinction is made between the beam quality factor Mx2 with regard to a first direction, designated by x, for example, and the beam quality factor My2 with regard to a second direction, which is designated by y, for example, and which is perpendicular to the first direction x. It is therefore entirely possible for the beam quality factor Mx2 to be greater or less than the beam quality factor My2.
Furthermore, in the prior art laser radiation is homogenized regularly prior to focusing into a working plane. This is done for example by means of lens arrays having a multiplicity of lenses, such that the laser radiation is split by said lenses into a multiplicity of partial beams that are superimposed in the working plane. It is evident, however, that the number of partial beams cannot be increased arbitrarily because in the case of an excessively large number of partial beams, upon corresponding superimposition of the partial beams in the working plane, high-frequency oscillations are caused by the interference between the beams. This would lead to an impairment of the beam quality in the working plane. The criterion for the occurrence of said high-frequency oscillations is the spatial coherence of the laser radiation in a direction perpendicular to the propagation direction. The worse said spatial coherence, the greater the number of partial beams into which the light can be split without high-frequency oscillations occurring upon superimposition. Under certain circumstances, the abovementioned beam quality factor M2, or Mx2 or My2, can also be an indication of the spatial coherence, such that in the case of a large beam quality factor, splitting into a large number of partial beams is possible under certain circumstances.
Intensity distributions in the direction perpendicular to the longitudinal extent of the linear focal region which correspond to a so-called top hat profile are desired in various applications. An intensity distribution having a sharp intensity maximum can be more advantageous in other applications.
Proceeding from these considerations, the present invention is based on the object of further developing a device of the type mentioned in the introduction in such a way that it is possible to influence the intensity distribution in the direction perpendicular to the longitudinal extent of the linear focal region.
This is achieved according to the invention by means of a device of the type as now presented in the appended claims.
In accordance with the present invention, it is provided that the device comprises lens means, preferably lens means which can be moved in the propagation direction of the laser radiation, for influencing the linear intensity distribution in the working plane, wherein, by altering the position of the lens means in the propagation direction of the laser radiation, it is possible to alter the intensity profile perpendicularly to the extent of the linear intensity distribution.
In particular, by altering the position of the lens means in the propagation direction of the laser radiation, the intensity profile can undergo transition from a top hat form to a form having a comparatively sharp maximum. As a result, a suitable intensity profile can be selected depending on the application.
It may be provided that the device furthermore comprises a telescope, which is arranged downstream of the movable lens means in the propagation direction of the laser radiation, wherein the telescope is formed from at least two further lens means which have a refractive power at least in a direction perpendicularly to the direction of the longitudinal extent of the linear intensity distribution. By means of said telescope, the intensity profile of the laser radiation in the output-side focal plane of the movable lens means can be transferred into the working plane. In this case, the telescope can, in particular, reduce the beam waist in the direction perpendicular to the longitudinal extent of the linear intensity distribution.
It may be provided that the laser light source can emit a multi-mode laser radiation, in the case of which the beam quality factor Mx2 with regard to a first direction perpendicular to the propagation direction of the laser radiation is greater than 1 and also the beam quality factor My2 with regard to a second direction perpendicular to the propagation direction is greater than 1.
There is the possibility that the device furthermore comprises beam transformation means, which are arranged in the device in such a way that they can transform the laser radiation or partial beams of the laser radiation in such a way that the beam quality factor with regard to the first direction is increased and that the beam quality factor with regard to the second direction is reduced.
The beam transformation means can transform the laser radiation or partial beams of the laser radiation in such a way that the beam quality factor and/or the spatial coherence properties with regard to the first direction of the laser radiation or of each of the partial beams is or are interchanged with the beam quality factor and/or the spatial coherence properties with regard to the second direction.
It is evident that in this way the beam quality factor for one of the two directions can be significantly smaller than before the beam transformation, whereas the beam quality factor for the other of the two directions can be significantly larger after the beam transformation than before the beam transformation. The reason for this is also due to the splitting of the laser radiation into a plurality of partial beams. This splitting can be effected either in the beam transformation means or in separate beam splitting means arranged upstream of the beam transformation means. It is evident that in this case the beam quality factor can be reduced, in particular can be divided by the number of partial beams, with regard to one of the two directions perpendicular to the propagation direction.
What can be achieved is that the beam quality factor with regard to one direction is significantly reduced and does not become much greater than 1, wherein the beam quality factor with regard to the other direction is increased relative to the state before the beam transformation. If, however, a very thin line is to be produced by the device according to the invention in a working plane, it is important that a very good focusing onto a very small beam waist can be effected in the direction perpendicular to the longitudinal extent of the line. In the case of a very small beam quality factor with regard to this direction, a very thin linear profile can thus be obtained. In particular, a highly defined intensity distribution with a top hat profile can be produced in this case. The fact that in this case the beam quality factor with regard to the longitudinal extent of the line is significantly increased at the same time does not prove to be disadvantageous since no or no high degree of focusing is desired in the longitudinal direction of the line. On the contrary, as a result of the increase in the beam quality factor in the longitudinal direction of the line, in general the spatial coherence in this direction is also significantly reduced. This means, however, that lens arrays having very many lenses arranged alongside one another in this longitudinal direction can be used for homogenization without undesirable interference effects such as high-frequency oscillations occurring in the working plane. Consequently, a better homogeneity in the longitudinal direction of the line can additionally be obtained by means of the device according to the invention.
It may be provided that the device furthermore comprises beam splitting means for splitting the laser radiation into a plurality of partial beams, which are preferably arranged upstream of the beam transformation means in the propagation direction of the laser radiation in such a way that they can Fourier-transform the laser radiation.
In this case, there is the possibility that the beam transformation means are arranged downstream of the beam splitting means, in particular in the output-side Fourier plane of the beam splitting means. What can be achieved by means of the Fourier transformation is that an intensity profile that deviates from a Gaussian form is realized with regard to the direction perpendicular to the longitudinal extent of the linear intensity distribution. By way of example, a top hat profile or a profile having a comparatively sharp maximum can be achieved. What can be achieved by means of the Fourier transformation, in particular, is that a near field imaging of the partial beams emerging from the beam transformation means arises in the working plane.
Beam transformation means are known as such from the prior art, for example from EP 1 006 382 A1, EP 1 617 275 A1 and from EP 1 528 425 A1. However, they involve the transformation of the highly inhomogeneous laser radiation of a semiconductor laser with very small beam quality factor My2 of the fast axis direction and very large beam quality factor Mx2 of the slow axis direction in such a way that the laser radiation has a comparable beam quality in both directions after the beam transformation and corresponding collimation. In the case of the present invention, the beam transformation means known per se are utilized for the opposite effect. Laser radiation which, before the transformation, has beam quality factors My2 and Mx2, respectively, with regard to both directions which are not very different or are at least approximately equal in magnitude is transformed in such a way that after the beam transformation, the beam quality factor with regard to one of the two directions differs significantly from the beam quality factor with regard to the other of the two directions.
Further features and advantages of the present invention will become clear on the basis of the following description of preferred exemplary embodiments with reference to the accompanying illustrations, in which
a shows a plan view of a first embodiment of the beam splitting means of a device according to the invention;
b shows a side view of the beam splitting means in accordance with
c shows a cross section through the laser radiation after passing through the beam splitting means in accordance with
a shows a plan view of the beam transformation means of the device according to the invention;
b shows a side view of the beam transformation means in accordance with
c shows a perspective view of the beam transformation means in accordance with
d shows a cross section through the laser radiation after passing through the beam transformation means in accordance with
a shows a plan view of a first embodiment of the beam combining means of the device according to the invention;
b shows a side view of the beam combining means in accordance with
c shows a cross section through the laser radiation after passing through the beam combining means in accordance with
a shows a plan view of homogenizing and focusing means of the device according to the invention;
b shows a side view of the homogenizing and focusing means in accordance with
a shows a plan view of a second embodiment of the beam splitting means of a device according to the invention with beam transformation means arranged downstream thereof;
b shows a side view of the beam splitting means and the beam transformation means in accordance with
a shows a view which corresponds to
b schematically shows an intensity profile upstream of the lens means;
c schematically shows an intensity profile in the working plane which corresponds to the first position of the lens means;
d schematically shows an intensity profile in the working plane which corresponds to the second position of the lens means;
e schematically shows an intensity profile in the working plane which corresponds to the third position of the lens means;
a shows a view which corresponds to
b schematically shows an intensity profile upstream of the lens means;
c schematically shows an intensity profile in the working plane which corresponds to the first position of the lens means;
d schematically shows an intensity profile in the working plane which corresponds to the second position of the lens means; and
e schematically shows an intensity profile in the working plane which corresponds to the third position of the lens means.
A system of Cartesian coordinates is depicted in some of the illustrations for the sake of better orientation.
It can be seen schematically from
There is the possibility that the laser light source 1 is embodied as an Nd-YAG laser or as an excimer laser. In this case, the Nd-YAG laser can be operated for example at the fundamental frequency or with doubled frequency, or tripled, and so on. It is indicated in
The beam splitting means 2 can be seen in detail from
The beam splitting means 2 are formed as a cylindrical lens array, wherein the cylinder axes of the cylindrical lens array extend in the y direction. In particular, an array of convex cylindrical surfaces 12 is provided on the entrance surface and an array of concave cylindrical surfaces 13 is provided on the exit surface of the beam splitting means. What can be achieved through a corresponding choice of the focal lengths of said cylindrical surfaces and through a corresponding choice of their spacing is that four partial beams 14 spaced apart from one another in the x direction emerge from the beam splitting means 2.
It is entirely possible to provide more or fewer than four cylindrical surfaces 12, 13, such that more or fewer than four partial beams 14 arise. By way of example, eight or thirteen cylindrical surfaces 12, 13 can be provided.
c furthermore reveals that each individual one of the partial beams 14 has a beam quality factor Mx2=1 in the x direction and a beam quality factor My2=4 in the y direction. Overall, therefore, a beam quality factor Mx2=4 results for the x direction for all four partial beams 14 together.
The laser radiation split into individual partial beams 14 in this way enters into the beam transformation means 3, which can be seen from
It can be seen from
After passing through the beam transformation means 3, the individual partial beams 17 impinge on the beam combining means 4. The beam combining means 4 are formed in a manner corresponding to the beam splitting means 2 by an array of concave cylindrical surfaces 18 on the entrance surface and an array of convex cylindrical surfaces 19 on the exit surface of the beam combining means 4. A further telescope 20 is introduced into the beam path downstream of the beam combining means 4, which telescope expands the beam in the y direction by means of correspondingly arranged cylindrical lenses 21, 22.
c shows the cross section of the laser radiation 23 after passing through the beam combining means 4 and the telescope 20. It is evident that the laser radiation 23 is an individual laser beam having a square cross section. In particular, in this case the beam quality factor Mx2 is equal to 16 for the x direction and the beam quality factor My2 is equal to 1 for the y direction.
There is the possibility of not providing any beam combining means. Furthermore, the telescope 20 can also be dispensed with or the telescope 20 can be replaced by differently configured lenses which likewise comprise cylindrical lenses having cylinder axes that extend in the X direction. One example of such a configuration is illustrated in
This laser radiation 23 passes through the homogenizing means 5 (see
After passing through the homogenizing means 5, the laser radiation passes through the lens arrangement 6 comprising two lens means 26, 27, which are formed as two cylindrical lenses spaced apart from one another, wherein the cylinder axis of the first lens means 26 formed as a cylindrical lens extends in the y direction and the cylinder axis of the second lens means 27 formed as a cylindrical lens extends in the x direction. The lens arrangement 6 not only focuses the laser radiation in such a way that a linear intensity distribution 28 arises in the working plane 7 (see
The linear intensity distribution 28 in the working plane 7 can be seen by way of example from
In the Y direction, that is to say perpendicular to the longitudinal extent of the linear intensity distribution 28, the laser radiation can have a Gaussian distribution or a top hat distribution or any other distribution.
The individual partial beams 17, two of which are depicted in
The lens means 29 can be formed as an individual lens or as a plurality of lenses. If the lens means 29 are formed by a plurality of lenses, the latter are arranged in the device in such a way that the output plane 30 of the beam transformation means 3 is arranged in the input-side system focal plane of the lens means 29, and that the input plane 31 of the homogenizing means 5 is arranged in the output-side system focal plane of the lens means 29.
Furthermore, the lens or lenses of the lens means 29 can be formed as cylindrical lens whose cylinder axis extends in the Y direction.
Lens means 32 for collimating the laser radiation with regard to the Y direction are depicted by dashed lines in
A second embodiment of beam splitting means 2′ can be seen from
In this way, it is possible to achieve a Fourier transformation of the laser radiation 8, wherein, in particular, the beam transformation means 3 are arranged in the output-side Fourier plane of the beam splitting means 2′. This Fourier transformation makes it possible to obtain, in the working plane 7 in the Y direction or in the direction perpendicular to the longitudinal extent of the linear intensity distribution 28, an intensity profile having a top hat form 38, as is illustrated by way of example in
A comparable intensity profile can be obtained independently of the configuration of the beam splitting means 2, 2′ by means of lens means 37 which are formed as a cylindrical lens and which are arranged downstream of the beam transformation means 3 or alternatively downstream of the homogenizing means 5. The cylinder axis of the lens means 37 extends in the X direction (see
A variant in which the lens means 37 can be moved in the propagation direction Z of the laser radiation is particularly advantageous. By altering the Z position of the lens means 37, it is possible to influence the intensity profile obtained in the working plane 7 in the Y direction or in the direction perpendicular to the longitudinal extent of the linear intensity distribution 28. By way of example, by altering the Z position of the lens means 37, it is possible to change from an intensity profile having a top hat form 38 to an intensity profile having a form 39 (see
In
The homogenizing means 5 and the lens means 26 formed as a cylindrical lens are merely depicted by dashed lines in
By way of example, the lens means 37 have a focal length f37 of 30 mm, the lens means 40 have a focal length f40 of 1000 mm and the lens means 27 have a focal length f27 of 30 mm. As is indicated schematically in
a illustrates the effect of the displacement of the lens means 37. In this case, 371, 372 and 373 designate the lens means at different positions. Furthermore, 411, 412 and 413 designate the output-side focal planes of the lens means 37 which result from the different positions of the lens means 37. Furthermore, 71, 72 and 73 designate the resultant displacements of the working plane 7.
In the case of a construction of the beam splitting means 2′ as illustrated in
A displacement of the lens means 371 into the second position, in which the lens means are provided with the reference sign 372, brings about a displacement of the output-side focal plane into the position provided with the reference sign 412. Accordingly, the working plane is also slightly displaced to a position provided with the reference sign 72. It is evident that an alteration of the intensity profile in the working plane 72 to give a distribution in accordance with
A further displacement of the lens means 372 into the third position, in which the lens means are provided with the reference sign 373, brings about a displacement of the output-side focal plane into the position provided with the reference sign 413. Accordingly, the working plane is also slightly displaced to a position provided with the reference sign 73. It is evident that an alteration of the intensity profile in the working plane 73 to give a distribution in accordance with
On account of the magnifying or demagnifying properties of the telescope formed by the lens means 40 and the lens means 27, a displacement of the lens means 37 from the first to the second or third position results in only a scarcely noticeable displacement of the working plane from 71 to 72 or 73. For example, in the case of the focal lengths mentioned by way of example, a displacement of the lens means 37 by 200 mm into the positions designated by 372 or 373 brings about a displacement in the working plane which is smaller by a factor of 332. Consequently, the displacement from 71 to 72 or 73 would be merely 0.18 mm. Such a displacement is comparatively insignificant in practice.
a to
Distributions in the working plane 72, 73 in accordance with
The lens means 37 can consist of an individual cylindrical lens or of a plurality of lenses. Furthermore, the lens means 40 can also consist of an individual cylindrical lens or of a plurality of lenses. Furthermore, the lens means 27 can also consist of an individual cylindrical lens or of a plurality of lenses.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2007 057 868 | Nov 2007 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2008/009677 | 11/15/2008 | WO | 00 | 7/29/2010 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2009/068192 | 6/4/2009 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5721416 | Burghardt et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
6341042 | Matsunaka et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6423927 | McCulloch | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6471372 | Lissotschenko et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6524977 | Yamazaki et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6542178 | Miyagawa et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6596613 | Kusumoto et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6707614 | Tanaka | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6947452 | Kusumoto et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7208358 | Kusumoto et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7303980 | Yamazaki et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7452788 | Yamazaki et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7486444 | Moriwaka | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7517774 | Kusumoto et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7939435 | Kusumoto et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
20030202251 | Yamazaki et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20050023218 | Calandra, Jr. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050097061 | Shapiro et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20060209310 | Muenz et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060291509 | Mitra et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
195 20 187 | Sep 1996 | DE |
600 17 076 | Dec 2005 | DE |
10 2006 018 504 | Oct 2007 | DE |
1 006 382 | Jun 2000 | EP |
1 528 455 | May 2005 | EP |
1 617 275 | Jan 2006 | EP |
1 708 008 | Oct 2006 | EP |
2007122061 | Nov 2007 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100309559 A1 | Dec 2010 | US |