This application is based upon French Patent Application No. 04.07834, filed on Jul. 13, 2004, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference thereto in its entirety and the priority of which is hereby claimed under 35 U.S.C. 119.
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a device for binding an article of footwear, such as a boot or a shoe, to a sports article, particularly to a gliding apparatus, such as a ski or a skate.
The invention also applies, in particular, to devices for binding a boot to a ski. In particular, it can be implemented in the design of bindings for cross-country skiing, alpine ski touring, Nordic ski touring or telemark skiing.
2. Description of Background and Relevant Information
An example of bindings of the aforementioned type is that of the cross country ski bindings marketed by Salomon S.A. under the trademark SNS Pilot® and described in the document EP 768 103 and in U.S. Pat. No. 6,017,050. In this type of binding, the boot is articulated by its front end about a transverse axis with respect to the ski, by means of a retaining system forming a jaw in which an articulation rod affixed to the boot sole is received.
The invention can also be applied in the context of a device such as described in the documents WO 00/13755, U.S. Pat. No. 6,499,761, EP 890 379, WO 96/37269, EP 914 844, U.S. Pat. No. 6,152,458, WO 01/93963, and U.S. patent application Publication No. 2003/0168830. In these types of bindings, the boot is retained on a connecting member connected to the remainder of the device by a mechanism that sets it, and the boot, on a particular path of movement between high and low positions.
The bindings to which the invention applies are to be distinguished from cable bindings of the types described, for example, in the documents U.S. Pat. No. 3,863,942, WO 99/02226, FR 2 363 341, and U.S. Pat. No. 3,844,575. These cable bindings are generally adapted for alpine skiing or telemark skiing. In either case, they include a stirrup arranged at the front, as well as a cable that is adapted to extend around the rear portion of the boot and to be tensioned in order to push the boot forward in support against the stirrup. Although the cable can possibly cause an elastic return effect, this effect is not the main effect desired, and it generally only occurs at the end the range of boot flexing. Indeed, the cable mainly acts as a boot retaining member within the retaining system constituted by the abutment and the cable. In this way, because the cable is primarily designed for its retention function, the return is generally arranged near the boot flexing point, which is approximately the center of rotation of the movement of the boot heel relative to the ski. As a result, because the return is arranged substantially in the area of this center of rotation, the cable only transmits a slight displacement to the spring, and the variation in this displacement with respect to the angular position of the heel varies only slightly; in addition, this variation is not truly controlled. In this way, the variation in the return force cannot be completely controlled. For certain positions of the boot, the return force can be almost zero; even negative. It has been noted that this control cannot be achieved when the retaining system and the elastic return system are not independent, as is the case in the prior art cable bindings in which, without the cable, the boot is no longer retained on the ski.
An object of the invention is to improve the bindings having a boot retaining system that carries out its function independently of an elastic return system. Indeed, particularly for cross-country skiing, the binding must have an elastic return system that brings the boot back toward its low position, which corresponds to its position when it is in front and rear support on the ski. This elastic return system must be sufficiently powerful to quickly bring the boot back to this low position. However, this elastic return system must also be adequately progressive in the increase of force as a function of the boot lift angle, and its action must not oppose too much resistance against the foot rolling movement.
Another object of the invention is to provide an elastic return system of a binding device according to the invention that is neither cumbersome nor too heavy.
Finally, in terms of a particular construction, an object of the invention is to provide an elastic return system of a binding device according to the invention that must be completely integrated into the remainder of the binding device, while allowing for a simple, accurate and reliable mounting of the device.
In order to address these objects, the invention encompasses a device for binding a boot to a sports article, of the type including a retaining system through which the boot is fixed to the sports article with a possibility that the boot move relative to the sports article, between a low position and a high position, of the type including a system for the elastic return of the boot toward its low position, and of the type in which the retaining system functions independently of the elastic return system, with the elastic return system being affixed to, or integrated within, a pre-assembled self-contained module.
Other characteristics and advantages of the invention will become apparent upon reading the following description, with reference to the attached drawings, in which:
The invention will be described here in the case of a binding device that is more particularly adapted to cross-country skiing, although the invention is not intended to be limited to the particular details beyond that described in the claims. Thus, the drawing figures show a device 10 adapted to bind a boot 46 onto a ski 15.
In this case, the boot 46 (represented by broken lines in
According to one aspect of the invention, and as seen as
In this embodiment of the invention, the retaining module is arranged at the front of the device, and it is arranged on an upper surface of the ski. The retaining module 11 can be an independent pre-assembled sub-assembly that is merely fixed on the ski, although it can be at least partially integrated into the ski. In the example shown, it can be seen that the retaining module 11 has a base 110 that forms a main body of the retaining sub-assembly, and which is adapted to be fixed on the ski, for example, by screws.
The principle of such a retaining system is described, for example, in the document FR 2 634 132, or, in a more closely related version, in the document EP 768 103 and U.S. Pat. No. 6,017,050, and is found in the cross-country ski binding devices marketed by Salomon S.A under the name of SNS Pilot®. The retaining system can either have a manual closure, as described, or an automatic closure.
In the device shown in the drawing figures, the retaining system has a hook-shaped front jaw 52 that is longitudinally movable with respect to the base, and controlled by an open/close lever 54, which is articulated at the front end of the retaining module. A transverse edge 56 of the base is arranged directly behind the movable jaw 52 and constitutes a fixed jaw that locks the front rod 48 of the boot 46 when the movable jaw is in a setback locking position. Once the rod 48 is locked by the retaining system, the boot is retained on the sports article, but movable with respect to the sports article, along a rotational movement about the axis of the rod 48, between a low position in which the boot sole is in support on the sports article, and a high position in which the heel is separated from the sports article. When the lever 54 is lifted by pivoting, as shown in
As is the case with the device in the document EP 768 103 and U.S. Pat. No. 6,017,050, the binding device 10 includes a system for the elastic return of the boot toward its low position, which is adapted to cooperate with the rear rod/pin 50 of the boot (see
The elastic return system and the corresponding module can assume various forms or shapes, similar to that of the system described in the document EP 768 103 and U.S. Pat. No. 6,017,050. However, according to yet another aspect of the invention, the elastic return system shown in the drawing figures (
In the example shown, the binding device 10 has a guiding rib 18 that is formed in a shape having a paralellepipedic or trapezoidal cross-section, and which extends longitudinally rearward, at the rear of the retaining system. In a known fashion, this guiding rib 18 is provided to cooperate with a groove having a complementary cross-section provided in the boot sole to guide the boot/binding assembly laterally. This guiding rib is formed by the geometry of a main body 130 forming a base of the rear return module 13.
Advantageously, the main part of the elastic return system is integrated within a housing 22 provided within this rib 18. In the example, the elastic member 20 is a traction spring that is horizontally and longitudinally arranged in the housing 22. The elastic member 20 is connected by a rear end to the base of the return module 13, and by its front end to the flexible linkage 30 that extends forward. The flexible linkage 30 is provided at its front end with a hook 58 made, for example, of metal or plastic. In this latter case, the hook can be co-molded on the front end of the flexible linkage so as to ensure a completely reliable anchoring. As can be seen in
The flexible linkage 30 passes beneath a return 34 (made, for example, in the form of a pulley or a curved surface, i.e., a guide) which is here arranged in the area of the front opening of the housing 22, and which is therefore borne by the return module 13.
Therefore, the functioning of the return system, when the boot is fixed on the device,is as follows. If the user lifts the heel of the boot, the boot making a rotational movement about the axis of the hinge defined by the front rod 48. At the same time, the rear rod 50 is raised along a substantially circular or arcuate path and, as shown in
One of the difficulties to overcome for the implementation of this return system is in enabling an easy and reliable fastening and unfastening of the hook 58 on the rear rod/pin 50 of the boot. Indeed, contrary to the elastic return system described in the document EP 768 103 and U.S. Pat. No. 6,017,050, the hook 58 here is arranged at the end of a flexible linkage 30 which, alone, cannot ensure an accurate and predetermined positioning of the hook 58 in the absence of the boot 46.
Therefore, according to another aspect of the invention, the binding device has a mechanism that makes it possible to displace the hook between a resting position, shown in
To this end, the return module 13 includes a slide 74 that is movably mounted in translation along the longitudinal direction at the front end of the housing 22, therefore at the front end of the module 13, as shown in
Furthermore, the hook 58 has a guiding portion 60 that is adapted to cooperate with complementary surfaces arranged at the front end of the slide 74. Thus, when the elastic member 20 brings the hook 58 back toward a resting position by means of the flexible linkage 30, in the absence of the boot, the hook 58 is guided and maintained in this predetermined position due to the cooperation of its guiding portion 60 and of the associated forms of the slide 74. These complementary shapes determine not only an accurate longitudinal position of the hook with respect to the slide 74 (and therefore also with respect to the main body of the module 13), they also preferably ensure a transverse blocking and a heightwise blocking of the hook.
As seen in the drawing figures, the slide 74 is longitudinally crossed by the flexible linkage 30, and one can see that the flexible linkage passes beneath a curved surface borne by the slide 74, this curved surface forming the return 34 mentioned above.
Furthermore, one can see that the system for retaining the binding device includes a drawer 62, or slide, a front portion of which is connected to the movable jaw 52 in order to follow the longitudinal movements thereof, which are controlled by the lever 54. Thus, as can be seen in
This rear portion 64 of the drawer 62 has a notch 65 that is housed behind a rear edge 75 of the slide 74, when the two subassemblies of the binding are assembled on the ski, such that, when the drawer 62 is controlled forward (i.e., when the user lifts the lever 54 to open the retaining system), the drawer 62 forwardly drives along the slide 74, by pulling the slide 74, from its resting position up to its waiting released position.
In this waiting position, shown in
When the user lowers the lever 54 to close the retaining system, causing the backward movement of the drawer 62, it is not necessary that the drawer 62 mechanically return the slide 74 toward the rear. Indeed, it can be sufficient for the hook 58 to automatically return the slide 74 toward the rear under the return effect of the elastic member 20.
The boot removal operation is carried out in an opposite manner. When the boot 46 is in the low position, the user opens the binding by lifting the lever 54, which causes the opening of the jaws 52, 56, on the one hand, and the advance of the drawer 62, on the other hand. By means of its rear portion 64, the drawer 62 drives the slide 74 and the hook 58 forward, which releases the rear rod 50 of the boot.
In practice, boot insertion can be undertaken in another manner, benefiting from the ramp shape of the upper surface of the hook 58. Indeed, the front rod 48 can be latched in the retaining system as described hereinabove, without the boot laying flat on the sports article. In this case, the hook 58 cannot get hooked onto the rear rod 50. However, the boot is then latched so that it can only make one circular or arcuate movement about the axis of the front rod 48.Therefore, by lowering the foot in order to bring it into contact with the sports article, the user will bring the rear rod 50 into contact with the upper surface of the hook, which is then in the resting position. Under the effect of the user's weight, the rear rod cooperates with the ramp shape of the hook 58 in order to cause the latter to advance, against the elastic return force, until fastening occurs by a mere snap engagement.
Preferably, the flexible linkage 30 is inextensible, or substantially inextensible. For example, the linkage can be a metallic cable or a fiber cable with very low extensibility, such as, for example, a cable made of aramide fibers. It is also contemplated according to the invention that the linkage can be made in the form of a band. This traction band can be made, for example, in the form of a metallic strip or an assembly of parallel fibers embedded in a polymeric material. Preferably, the linkage is sufficiently supple and flexible to not produce any notable elastic effect, and in particular to support a return angle of approximately 90 degrees. As a result, the suppleness of the linkage 30 must be mainly appreciated as being a flexional suppleness about the return axis. This suppleness of the linkage cannot only be local, because the linkage is displaced with respect to the return. Conversely, particularly if the supple linkage is a band, this band will not be flexionally supple about an axis that is perpendicular to the plane of the band, but this will not prevent the band from being considered as supple in the context of the invention if it does not offer any significant resistance to flexion about the axis of the return.
In certain cases, it can be advantageous to provide the return system with an adjustment mechanism in order to provide the user with the possibility to increase or decrease the intensity of the elastic return force so as to adapt it to the user's style in the practice of his/her sport.
In the example shown, the adjustment mechanism merely varies the stiffness of the elastic member, by imparting thereon a more or less substantial pre-stress. Thus, in the illustrated embodiment, the rear end of the spring is hooked on a loop or ring 84 that is mounted in the housing 22 on a screw 40, while being rotationally blocked about the axis of the screw. The rear end of the screw 40 extends outside of the housing 22 and has the form of a screw head 42 so as to enable the user to control the rotation of the screw 40 about its axis. In this way, with this screw-nut system, the user can cause the longitudinal displacement of the ring 84 in the housing in order to cause a more or less substantial pre-stress of the spring 20. In an alternative embodiment (not shown), one can provide that the guide rib 18 include a window which would enable the user to see the position of the ring, and which would therefore enable the user to evaluate the pre-stress value of the spring. Graphical reference markings could be associated with this window.
This elastic return system is particularly advantageous because it makes it possible to house the elastic member in a zone of the device where it does not hinder the kinematics and the rolling movement of the foot allowed by the binding. In this case, the elastic return module 13 is arranged at the rear of the retaining system 11, but one could also provide that it be arranged at the front thereof.
As the flexible linkage extends along a return, one further obtains a better orientation of the direction of the return force, which follows the direction of the portion of the supple linkage that extends between the return and the boot. This orientation is substantially parallel to that of the trajectory that the boot must follow toward its low position.
In the binding device according to the invention, the return system provides a return force that is completely controlled, in particular because the boot is retained by an independent system, i.e., a system that is independent of the elastic return system. Thus, one can provide that the lift begin with a small initial return force, and can provide to then “program” the development curve of this force as a function of the boot lift angle. To this end, the elastic member can be constituted by a plurality of serial and/or parallel springs, and/or it can also incorporate elastomeric elements having another type of force/deformation curve.
Furthermore, in any case, the elastic return system can be completed by other elastic systems or abutment systems.
Thus, as shown in
The abutment 82 shown in the drawing figures is fixed, but one could provide that its longitudinal position be adjustable by the user, particularly so that the user can adapt the reference position to the length of his/her stride.
In the case of an elastic abutment, the abutment provides a return force that is complementary to that of the main return system.
In terms of construction, the retaining module 11 has a main body that forms a base 110, a movable body 112 that forms both the movable jaw 52 and the drawer 62, the lever 54 that is articulated in the movable body, and a connecting rod 114 which, as seen in
Similarly, the return module 13 has a main body 130 which also forms a base through which the return module 13 is at least partially fixed on the ski. This main body thus has an axial portion in the form of a hollow beam 132 that forms, on the outside, the guiding rib 18 and, on the inside, the housing 22. At the rear, this axial beam 132 is bordered, transversely on both sides, by two horizontal flanges 134 adapted to come in support on the upper surface of the ski.
In the embodiment shown, it is also to be understood that the arch 118 of the retaining module 11 partially ensures the fixing of the return module 13, this fixing being completed by the fact that the main body 130 of this return module, which is in support on the upper surface of the ski, is also directly fixed on the ski by its rear portion due to a screw that is screwed through the opening 136. This solution, through which the unitary elastic return module is fixed only partially independently on the sports article, makes it possible to simplify the mounting of the return module 13. However, one could also provide that the fixing of the return module be completely independent of that of the retaining module.
In the example shown, one can see that the return module 13 covers and hides the rear plate of the extension 116, thus hiding the fixing screw 119. The design of the device in two self-contained subassemblies makes it possible to arrange a fixing means substantially in the middle of the device, in a zone that is no longer accessible once the return module is positioned. In a one-piece construction, such an arrangement of the fixing means would be problematic, simply due to the lack of access to the fixing means.
The binding device according to the invention is therefore designed such that the elastic return module is capable of being dismounted from the sports article independently of the retaining system. In this way, it is possible to replace one elastic return module with another, either of the same type (for example, when an element of the return module is broken), or of a different type. In this latter case, for example, the same retaining system can be provided to be used with return modules incorporating elastic members having a different stiffness. The return modules can also be provided to use different elastic return systems. Indeed, one can provide to obtain a self-contained return module on the basis of the elastic return system having a connecting rod, as described in the prior art document EP 768 103 and in U.S. Pat. No. 6,017,050.
The design of a binding device having a return module can thus make it possible to standardize the retaining system between two types of binding, allowing a greater possibility of choice for the user and/or enabling the manufacturer to produce these systems at lower costs.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
04 07834 | Jul 2004 | FR | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2172669 | Taft | Sep 1939 | A |
3844575 | Salomon | Oct 1974 | A |
3863942 | Burger | Feb 1975 | A |
3997188 | Begey | Dec 1976 | A |
4410200 | Näpflin | Oct 1983 | A |
5085454 | Provence et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5090723 | Arnulf | Feb 1992 | A |
5152546 | Dunand et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5228714 | Dekanovsky | Jul 1993 | A |
5310206 | Eugler et al. | May 1994 | A |
5366235 | Eugler et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5924719 | Girard | Jul 1999 | A |
6017050 | Girard | Jan 2000 | A |
6113111 | Gierveld et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6152458 | Edauw et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6374517 | Girard et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6499761 | Quellais | Dec 2002 | B1 |
20010015024 | Girard et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20030168830 | Haughlin | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040164519 | Quellais et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040262886 | Girard | Dec 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
41 43 410 | Jul 1993 | DE |
0 768 103 | Apr 1997 | EP |
0 890 379 | Jan 1999 | EP |
0 914 844 | May 1999 | EP |
2 363 341 | Mar 1978 | FR |
2 634 132 | Jan 1990 | FR |
2 650 192 | Feb 1991 | FR |
8 602 796 | Jun 1988 | NL |
WO - 9637269 | Nov 1996 | WO |
WO - 9902226 | Jan 1999 | WO |
WO - 0013755 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO - 0193963 | Dec 2001 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060012151 A1 | Jan 2006 | US |