The present invention relates to a technique to manage a standard work time in a production line.
A production line for a product that is manufactured undergoing multiple processes is designed to avoid occurrence of surplus or slowdown of production, in order to enhance overall production efficiency.
A standard work time is one of basic information used for designing the process and giving an operating instruction in the production line as described above. The standard work time indicates a work time that is used by a worker having an average proficiency level, who performs the operation with normal effort under a standard working condition. A setting value of the standard work time has considerable influence on production efficiency in the production line, and therefore, setting an appropriate value is an essential element in establishing the production line.
In general, there are methods for calculating the standard work time such as: Work Sampling method for categorizing intermittent actions into operations so as to modify the actions to standard values (perform rating); Predetermined Time Standards method for segmentalizing human operations into standard actions and applying a predetermined time value to each of the basic actions; and Method-Time Measurement method for converting a size of the basic action, based on a moved distance or a degree of difficulty.
For example, a technique described in the patent document 1 is known as a method for actually utilizing the standard work time that is calculated according to the aforementioned methods.
Patent Document
In the technique described in the patent document 1, there is prepared in advance a database which registers a relationship between an elemental work and a standard work time in each process. When a new process is designed in the production line, the database is searched for an operation that fits the best the description of the elemental work included in the new process, thereby enabling automatic setting of the standard work time.
However, there has been a problem inherently that the standard work time calculated according to the above method does not consider variation factors, notably such as a difference in workers' individual skills and busyness level, and therefore, there is seen an alienation between the planned production capability and an actual production capability. Therefore, it has been difficult to set a standard work time appropriate for the actual production capability, even by the method described in the patent document 1 which utilizes the database made of such data as mentioned above.
An object of the present invention is to provide a technique which calculates a standard work time which considers variations in a production index based on an actual execution status, thereby enabling establishment of a production plan with high precision.
In order solve the problem above, the present invention provides a technique in which a production line is segmented by period and process being predetermined, and a standard work time is calculated for a region where variation of a predetermined evaluation index in each segment is equal to or higher than a predetermined threshold. By way of example, a standard work time calculation device relating to the present invention is a device for calculating a standard work time of a production line made up of multiple processes, includes a storage section for storing information indicating a work time for each of the processes constituting the production line, and information indicating a production index for each segment, being divided by period and process, and a controller for calculating a standard deviation, an average, and a variation coefficient obtained by dividing the standard deviation by the average, in a range including multiple periods, as to each of the production index calculated for each of the segment, identifying a variation region made up of the segment having the variation coefficient equal to or higher than the predetermined threshold, and calculating from the information indicating the work time, a standard work time in the period and in the process specified by the segment constituting the variation region.
As described above, according to the present invention, it is possible to provide a technique which enables setting of the standard work time, more appropriate for a working situation of the production line.
Hereinafter, the best mode for carrying out the present invention will be explained with reference to the accompanying drawings.
As illustrated, the standard work time management system 1 incorporates a standard work time calculation device 10 for calculating a standard work time based on work performance of a production line, a terminal device 18 for supplying the work performance to the standard work time calculation device 10, a work performance input device 17 for inputting the work performance to the terminal device 18, a scheduling device 21 for performing a scheduling of the production line, and a simulation device 22 for performing a process design of the production line.
The terminal device 18 is, for instance, a server provided on a network and it collects work performance and accumulates data in a work performance database 181.
Specifically, when the terminal device 18 accepts the work performance of the production line inputted from the work performance input device 17 which will be described below, the terminal device 18 registers the work performance in the work performance database 181. There are recorded in the work performance database, for instance, information relating to a work time such as a work start time and a work end time, and information relating to a production index such as the number of product in process, a yield rate, an availability factor, a test accepted quantity, a test unaccepted quantity, in each of segments of the product line, being segmented by identifier of an article such as a product number and a part number, by predetermined period (date, or the like), by process, and the like.
There will be explained an example of the work performance which is accumulated in the work performance database 181 of the terminal device 18. The work performance may be illustrated as shown in
In the present embodiment, an explanation will be made as to the case where only one unit of terminal device 18 manages the information of overall the production line. It is a matter of course that more than one terminal device 18 may be installed, in association with the number of the production lines.
The work performance input device 17 accepts an input of the work performance, and transmits the input to the terminal device 18. It is to be noted that more than one work performance input device 17 may be prepared for each process, for instance, and the terminal device 18 is allowed to accumulate information from multiple work performance input devices 17.
The scheduling device 21 is directed to the production line made up of multiple processes, and gives a manufacturing instruction to each of the processes constituting the production line, in response to a manufacturing order. By way of example, the scheduling device 21 designs a plan indicating when to start manufacturing a product, parts, and the like, in each of the processes constituting the production line, on the basis of the standard work time supplied from the standard work time calculation device 10.
The simulation device 22 verifies the capability of the production line. By way of example, the simulation device 22 calculates a simulation result of the production line, based on the standard work time supplied from the standard work time calculation device 10, a production volume in each of the process, a lead time between the processes, and the like, which are used as parameters for the simulation.
The standard work time calculation device 10 incorporates a controller 11, a storage section 12, an I/F section 13, an input section 14, and a display section 15.
The controller 11 incorporates a variation coefficient calculator 111 for calculating the variation coefficient from a targeted predetermined production index (referred to as “evaluation index”), a variation region identifier 112 for identifying the variation region having the variation coefficient equal to or higher than a predetermined threshold, and a standard work time calculator 113 for calculating the standard work time in the variation region.
Specifically, the variation coefficient calculator 111 calculates the variation coefficient based on the evaluation index, with respect to each period and process. It is to be noted that the variation which occurs in the production line is detected in the units of arbitrary period (moving average interval). The moving average interval will be explained later.
The variation region identifier 112 diagrammatically illustrates the region where the variation coefficient calculated by the variation coefficient calculator 111 is equal to or higher than the threshold, and decides the region where the evaluation index shows variation.
The standard work time calculator 113 calculates the standard work time as to each of the region with variation (the variation coefficient is equal to or higher than the threshold), and the region without variation (the variation coefficient is lower than the predetermined threshold), and stores the standard work time thus calculated in the standard work time database 122.
The storage section 12 incorporates a table database 121 and a standard work time database 122.
The table database 121 stores the work performance table acquired from the work performance database, an evaluation index table indicating the evaluation index of each segment obtained by dividing the production line by period and process, and a variation coefficient table indicating the variation coefficient of each segment. It is to be noted that those tables will be explained later.
The standard work time database 122 stores a standard work time table for each of the predetermined regions, calculated by the standard work time calculation device 10. The standard work time table will be explained later.
The I/F section 13 connects the standard work time calculation device 10 with other devices and a network, enabling data sending and receiving.
The input section 14 is a user interface to accept a manipulating instruction from a user.
The display section 15 displays an image or the like, which is generated to be shown for the user.
Here, there will be explained a hardware configuration of the standard work time calculation device 10.
As shown in
The standard work time calculation device 10 as described above may be implemented by a general computer 900, as shown in
By way of example, the storage section 12 may be implemented when the CPU 901 utilizes the memory 902 or the external memory storage unit 903, the controller 11 may be implemented when a predetermined program stored in the external memory storage unit 903 is loaded on the memory 902 and the CPU 901 executes the program, the input section 14 may be implemented when the CPU 901 utilizes the input unit 906, the display section 15 may be implemented when the CPU 901 utilizes the output unit 907, and the I/F section 13 may be implemented when the CPU 901 utilizes the communication unit 908.
This predetermined program may be downloaded on the external storage unit 903, from the storage medium 904 via the reader/writer 905, or from the network via the communication unit 908, and thereafter, loaded on the memory 902 to be executed by the CPU 901. In addition, the program may be directly loaded on the memory 902, from the storage medium 904 via the reader/writer 905, or from the network via the communication unit 908, and thereafter executed by the CPU 901.
With reference to the flow diagram shown in
Firstly, the variation coefficient calculator 111 of the standard work time calculation device 10 accepts an input of information that is used as a reference standard for calculating the standard work time (S10).
Specifically, the variation coefficient calculator 111 accepts instructions as to a predetermined range (period and process) of the production line segmented on the work performance table, and as to the production index (evaluation index) targeted for checking whether or not there is variation in this range. By way of example, a screen prompting for an instruction regarding the reference standard above is displayed on the display section 15, and accepts the instruction from the user via the input section 14.
Next, the variation coefficient calculator 111 acquires from the work performance database 181 of the terminal device 18, the work performance table which is based on the standard determined in the step 10 (S11). It is to be noted that the work performance table being obtained is registered in the table database 121.
The variation coefficient calculator 111 assumes that the work performance table is accumulated in advance in the work performance database 181. Following explanation will be made, assuming that the variation coefficient calculator 111 acquires the work performance table as illustrated in
Next, the variation coefficient calculator 111 detects the evaluation index from the work performance table, and generates and registers the evaluation index table (S12).
Specifically, the variation coefficient calculator 111 extracts the evaluation index, inhere, the number of work start in each of the processes, based on the work performance table. This can be represented by a table as shown in
It is a matter of course that the evaluation index is not limited to the number of work start, but it is also applicable to any of the elements which may bring about a change in distribution of goods, such as the number of work completion, a device processing time, a production quantity, the number of in-process items, and a yield rate.
Furthermore, the variation coefficient calculator 111 calculates an extended coefficient of variation of the evaluation index (S13).
Specifically, the variation coefficient calculator 111 firstly uses formula 1 as shown below, to calculate an average value of the evaluation index during a certain period.
The formula 1 obtains a moving average of the evaluation index during a certain period. In the example of
It is to be noted here that a date is used as the clock time, and a week is used as the moving average interval, but any time units (year, month, day, hour, minute, second, or the like) may be applicable.
Next, the variation coefficient calculator 111 uses the following formula 2 to obtain a standard deviation.
The formula 2 is to obtain a square root of mobility statistics as to variance of the evaluation index; that is, to obtain the standard deviation in the aforementioned moving average interval k.
Then, the variation coefficient calculator 111 uses the following formula 3 to obtain an extended coefficient of variation, from the average value and the standard deviation of the evaluation index.
The formula 3 is to obtain the mobility statistics of the variation coefficient, which is a ratio between the moving average and the standard deviation.
In here, the variation region identifier 112 generates a screen which diagrammatically illustrates each variation coefficient obtained by the variation coefficient calculator 111 as described above, and displays the screen on the display section 15 (S14).
By way of example, when the variation coefficient is calculated for the evaluation index table as shown in
Next, the variation region identifier 112 accepts from a user, a setting of a threshold for designating the variation region (S15).
Specifically, the user inputs the threshold via the input section 14 to set the threshold. In here, if the user knows a variation period of the evaluation index (e.g., a period when the evaluation index was drastically changed, such as the time of business prosperity, a trouble such as device failure, or the like), the user may be allowed to input as the threshold, a variation coefficient for the period and the process, which might cause the variation, with reference to the variation coefficient table as shown in
The variation region identifier 112 stores into the storage section 12, the threshold being set as described above, as the threshold information as shown in
Upon accepting the setting of the threshold, the variation region identifier 112 identifies a segment (each segment is referred to as a cell) as the variation region, which includes the variation coefficient equal to or higher than the threshold, as to the variation coefficient table as shown in
Next, the variation region identifier 112 accepts permission for fixing the variation region, from the user via the input section 14 (S17).
For example, the user refers to the variation coefficient table indicating the variation region which is displayed as the confirmation screen in the step 16, and determines whether or not the variation region is extracted appropriately and a desired result is obtained. If the variation region is appropriately extracted (Yes in S17), the user executes an operation for giving an instruction to confirm acceptance, via the input section 14. On the other hand, if the variation region is not extracted appropriately (No in S17), it is possible that the processing returns to the step 15 and setting of the threshold is performed again.
Here, variation of the evaluation index will be explained. As shown in
It is further possible that the variation region identifier 112 determines whether or not the variation region on the confirmation screen has a shape showing the characteristic of the butterfly phenomenon (e.g., a shape being continuous from the upper left cell to the lower right cell), and then removes noise and the like in a region other than the region where the butterfly phenomenon occurs.
As a method for executing the processing as described above, for instance, the variation region identifier 112 firstly decides a cell serving as a reference standard, out of the cells where the variation is shown, and checks the variation coefficient of the left, upper, and upper-left cells which come into contact with the cell as the standard. When two or more variation coefficients in the cells are equal to or higher than the threshold, out of the three cells above, the variation region identifier 112 determines that the cell as the standard and the cells being equal to or higher than the threshold among the three cells are influenced by the propagation from the upstream process; in other words, those cells indicate the butterfly phenomenon.
It is also possible to configure such that the variation region identifier 112 automatically readjusts the threshold, until there appears cells indicating the butterfly phenomenon, i.e., the variation region having the characteristic of the butterfly phenomenon.
Furthermore, the variation region identifier 112 is able to receive on the confirmation screen, a designation from the user that only a desired region is set as the variation region. By way of example, the variation region identifier 112 accepts the designation in the units of cell from the user via the input section 14, then the cells equal to or higher than the threshold are decided as the variation region, out of the cells within the region being designated, and the decided region is utilized in later processing.
When the variation region is decided, the standard work time calculator 113 calculates a standard work time with regard to the evaluation index, for the variation region (S18).
Specifically, the standard work time calculator 113 firstly extracts from the work performance table acquired in the step 11, information regarding the work time in the following ranges of the production line; the range specified by the cells in the variation region and the range specified by the cells in the region having the variation coefficient lower than the threshold.
By way of example,
Next, the standard work time calculator 113 calculates the work time for each of the segments of the production line, being segmented by period and process. In here, the work time is figured out according to the work start time and the work end time.
Then, the standard work time calculator 113 calculates the standard work time that is an average obtained by dividing the total work time as to each process, by a work count. The standard work time calculator 113 further calculates a standard deviation in each process, generates the standard work time table, and stores the table in the standard work time database 122 in the storage section 12.
The standard work time calculator 113 may further execute the same processing for the region having the variation coefficient lower than the threshold, generates the standard work time table showing the standard work time and the standard deviation as to each of the processes, and outputs the table to the scheduling device 21 and to the simulation device 22.
One embodiment of the present invention has been explained.
According to the embodiment described above, the standard work time calculation device 10 is able to calculate the standard work time in the region showing a certain level or higher variation in the evaluation index.
In addition, the state of distribution is made visible based on the evaluation indexes which fluctuate with each passing hour. Therefore, it is possible to easily specify what causes disturbance in the distribution and how the variation propagates subsequently. By designating the region as the variation region, a user is allowed to acquire the standard work time in the case where the same cause occurs. Accordingly, it is possible hereafter to design a production line which uses the standard work time appropriate for reality, according to the factors causing the distributional disturbance.
Next, with reference to the drawings, an explanation will be made as to an example where the present invention is applied to an actual production line to design a work plan.
According to
According to
The work plan shown in the middle row is designed in such a manner that the time is longer by the amount of A than the work plan shown in the upper row. This is because, for instance, the region where the butterfly phenomenon occurs may generate a large error between the plan and the actual state, and therefore generous amount of allowance is estimated in each of the processes.
The work plan shown in the lower row is designed in such a manner that the time is shorter by the amount of B than the work plan shown in the uppermost row. This is because, for instance, the region with less variation has a high possibility that the operation proceeds as scheduled and less amount of allowance is estimated in each of the processes.
As discussed above, according to the present invention, the scheduling device and the simulation device use as input data, the standard work time categorized by the size of the variation coefficient, when a production line is established. Therefore, it is possible to design the production line, considering a period, an amount of variation, a cause, and the like, regarding the variation of the production index (evaluation index) targeted for evaluation in an actual production line, without restrained by a predetermined standard work time. Consequently, for instance, it is possible to improve the production index of the production line to be suitable for the reality, such as reducing a surplus production by setting production capabilities in each of continuous processes to the same level, and reducing slowdown of production by synchronizing the operations in respective processes, thereby enhancing a production efficiency of the overall production line.
It is to be noted that the application of the standard work time being calculated is not limited to the examples above, and it is applicable to various processing. It is further possible to configure such that the standard work time database 122 is stored in the terminal device 18, to supply the standard work time calculated by the standard work time calculation device 10 to another device on the network.
1: STANDARD WORK TIME MANAGEMENT SYSTEM, 10: STANDARD WORK TIME CALCULATION DEVICE, 11: CONTROLLER, 111: VARIATION COEFFICIENT CALCULATOR, 112: VARIATION REGION IDENTIFIER, 113: STANDARD WORK TIME CALCULATOR, 12: STORAGE SECTION, 121: TABLE DATABASE, 122: STANDARD WORK TIME DATABASE, 13: I/O INTERFACE SECTION, 14: INPUT SECTION, 15: DISPLAY SECTION, 17: WORK PERFORMANCE INPUT DEVICE, 18: TERMINAL DEVICE, 181: WORK PERFORMANCE DATABASE, 21: SCHEDULING DEVICE, 22: SIMULATION DEVICE
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2008-300781 | Nov 2008 | JP | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/JP2009/068795 | 11/4/2009 | WO | 00 | 7/21/2011 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2010/061716 | 6/3/2010 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5479343 | Matoba et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
6393455 | Eilert et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
20020065704 | Wada et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20030169909 | Yamagishi | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040193291 | Sakai | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20080104543 | Yokohari et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20100162200 | Kamiyama et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
07-028896 | Jan 1995 | JP |
2007-140625 | Jun 2007 | JP |
2007-188306 | Jul 2007 | JP |
2008-152312 | Jul 2008 | JP |
Entry |
---|
JP Notification of Reasons for Refusal for Japanese Patent Application No. 2008-300781, issued on Mar. 12, 2013. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110276162 A1 | Nov 2011 | US |