This invention relates to a device for connecting and at the same time standardizing the separation between masonry units in the construction of walls, preferably of industrial clay bricks, whether solid or hollow, but which have a pair of holes in which to introduce the connectors or separators, which tremendously eases the construction process, making it quicker and less intensive in manpower, but also with better results.
The ceramic brick is one of the oldest construction materials that exists, and which is widely used until today mainly for it's thermal and acoustic properties, besides the great aesthetic appreciation it enjoys in different cultures. Despite the above, in many places it is not used as much as the consumer wants, and this is due to the scarcity and high cost of skilled labor.
The shapes of the bricks, their technical characteristics and methods of use, vary considerably from place to place, even within the same country or region, and this is basically due to two reasons: the subjective or traditional and cultural reasons, and on the other hand the objective or practical reasons, and in the latter group the main factors are geographic, climatic and seismic characteristics that determine the shape of the bricks in different places.
Thus in Brazil, a country exempt from earthquakes, the bricks have a high percentage of void volume compared to baseline volume and their position in the walls is not important, as they are usually plastered, and structural forces that they must endure are basically due to the weight of the construction.
On the east coast of the United States, in regions where tornadoes occur, most of the houses are made of wood, which are totally destroyed with the passage of tornadoes, but not masonry houses which are less frequent. But experts say this is partly for traditional reasons and mainly due to the higher cost of masonry homes. Instead in the California area, a region of large earthquakes, the use of masonry is minimal for a cultural reason, because it is thought that the use of bricks is not good at withstanding major earthquakes.
In Chile, however, the most seismic country in the world along with Japan, hollow masonry bricks are widely used for building houses of two and three stories without using reinforced concrete pillars, but emulating them in the holes of the main bricks with a steel rod and filling them with grout (a more resistant mixture than the one that is used to stick the units). The brick which is used in addition to having its two main holes, has a number of smaller holes distributed in the rest of the surface, but where the void volume is less than 50% of the baseline volume of the brick, i.e., the volume of the outer parallelepiped rectangular shape. This construction system showed a very good performance during the last major earthquake of 8.8 on the Richter scale occurred in central Chile on Feb. 27, 2010.
In Chile this construction system is called Reinforced Masonry and is widely used in the construction of housing for the middle and low socioeconomic strata. However, the procedure is quite precarious, since it considers the installation of pillars at both ends of the wall, with marks of the level of each row, including a tense thread that serves as a reference for leveling and aligning each brick, only building up to 1.2 meters in a shift, the method is slow, cumbersome and fallible, therefore, the results depend too much on the neatness of the builders, who are increasingly scarce and expensive in terms of labor. For this reason, the results are not always good and often incur costs of repairing the walls. To this we must add that the system allows malpractices that can decrease the resistance of a wall up to 50%, which is not detectable or reparable.
This is the reason why masonry has lost ground in construction compared to other, faster methods that give greater assurance of good results. Masonry is not only being replaced by new lighter and inexpensive systems, but also by Reinforced Concrete, which is significantly more expensive.
To facilitate the construction process, in places like Mexico, masonry blocks with a tongue and groove system are made. But as these blocks cannot be produced by extrusion, such as clay, they are manufactured with a wet cementitious mixture and by compression. However, these blocks have very low resistance to all types of forces and are not comparable with clay bricks.
An interesting innovation is a concrete block designed at Harvard, whose shape allows interlocking of units in both the longitudinal and transverse direction to the wall. It also has an insulating material inside. But as a result, their manufacture is complex and is not comparable with clay brick. However these initiatives come to demonstrate the precariousness of the traditional process of masonry, a situation that dims when the walls do not need to withstand large forces, because in those cases a very thin layer of mortar and leveling of each brick is much easier, plus they are lighter.
An innovation, not in masonry units, but in relation to the construction of walls, is the development by the US company Construction Robotics, of a sophisticated mason robot that takes a brick, applies a layer of fresh mortar and through a series of sensors installs it in the exact position, thus the bricklayer is responsible for making the mix for the robot and doing the stonework, that is to say, removing excess mortar and refining the shape of the joints between bricks. The robot doubles the productivity of a human bricklayer and works only in the straight part of the walls (not in corners) and it seems that its use is only justified in walls of large dimensions, where the brick is used as an exterior wall for the structural walls made with concrete blocks.
Thanks to the low dimensional variability of hollow bricks, and using the fact that they are designed such that the main cavity of each block matches the blocks of the adjacent rows, all the previously mentioned problems, and their existence in the art, can be avoided if before applying the mortar a solid object of a suitable material is installed in all these holes, for example plastic or metal, which conforms to the tubular shape of these cavities vertically aligning the holes of the adjacent rows but in turn separating them with a wider section in the middle. A solution of this type is described in the Chilean Patent 42,628. However, the solution described by this patent has not proved to be entirely efficient, since small variations in the dimensions of the holes where these separators are installed make it difficult to install in some cases, and produce some distortions in the walls
In view of the problems described above, the present invention is based on the connector of Chilean Patent 42,628, but improving the ability of the connector to adapt to the variations of the gaps. The way to make the connector has the ability of reducing the basal contour of its cross section, to be adapted to the variations of the hollows of the bricks, is by incorporating an interruption in the contour or the transverse profile of the tubular body along its entire length, which in the case of a circular profile can be a groove, but in all other types of contours or profiles, it can be through one or more channels, which in the profile of the tubular body are seen as arcs inwards of the connector. This curved union should be of a thickness less than that of the tubular body, so that it can act in an elastic manner.
Consequently, by making a recess or chamfer outwards at the ends of the tubular body, the channels form a sort of nail or flap, which facilitates insertion of the connector into the holes and fit bricks already installed with connectors; this recess can be curved or straight and the width should be similar to the depth of the channels. As the connector is preferably plastic, the thickness of the channel should be less than the rest of the tubular body, as this facilitates the bending of the arches and the adjustment of the connector to fit the hole in the brick.
In order that the present invention is clearly understood and carried out easily, it has been shown in its preferred embodiments by means of the following illustrative and non-limiting figures that accompany this description and in which:
This invention relates to a device (100) for connecting and separating masonry units, preferably bricks. This connector device (100) is composed of a single piece, of a suitable material, such as plastic, and has a shape which allows its easy introduction into the holes in bricks, in turn being able to accommodate to the dimensional variations of them, producing the vertical alignment of hollow bricks, while generating a uniform separation of the masonry units.
The device (100) comprises of a tubular central body (1) conforming to the shape, also tubular, of the holes in bricks.
The connecting and separating device (100) comprises of a section (2) with a cross-section larger than the cross-section of the tubular body (1). Said portion (2) it is located preferably at half the length of said connector device (100).
The portion (2) can cause separation between the connecting bricks. The tubular body (1) further comprises at least one groove or channel (3a) or slot (3b) over the entire length of the tubular body (1) of the device (100), as shown in
The same ability to elastically reduce the basal contour of the cross section of the device (100) is produced by the groove or channel (3A); at least one in the case of circular cross section (
In the preferred embodiment of the invention, shown in
When the cross-section of the tubular body (1) is circular, in a preferred embodiment of the invention, the device (100) comprises at least three channels or grooves (3a), as shown in
In another embodiment of the invention, the cross-section of the tubular body (1) of the device (100) is square. In this embodiment, the device (100) preferably comprises of at least two channels or grooves (3a) at opposite corners of said square section, as shown in
In the case that the cross section of the tubular body (1) is square, the device (100) comprises channels or grooves (3a) on the four corners of said square cross section, as shown in
The portion (2) with the larger cross-section has a similar profile to the tubular shape. In one embodiment of the invention, said portion (2) with larger cross-section comprises a number of fins, teeth or projections (5), distant from each other. Said fins or protruding teeth (5) are at least two per each side, in the case that the cross section of the tubular body (1) is square. These projections (5) seen in the embodiments shown by
In another embodiment of the invention, the tubular body has a number of longitudinal slots (7), which extend from each end of the tubular body to the central portion of greater dimension (2) with a cross section or outgoings (5), as appropriate. This type of connector is applicable to bricks or blocks with small holes, as is observed in
The device for connecting and separating bricks enables a construction procedure, claimed in the application PCT WO2015181582, which consists of building walls with only bricks and connectors for injecting mortar ex post through the slots that occur between the bricks. The channels which allow the device to conform to variations in the holes also make it possible to correct certain imperfections in the walls after being built and those produced by variations in the bricks.
The connector is preferably plastic and efficient manufacturing is through the process called Injection (molding).
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/CL2016/050026 | 5/26/2016 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2017/201633 | 11/30/2017 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1051427 | McCluskey | Jan 1913 | A |
3430404 | Muse | Mar 1969 | A |
3479782 | Muse | Nov 1969 | A |
3609926 | Muse | Oct 1971 | A |
3864885 | Muse | Feb 1975 | A |
4110949 | Cambiuzzi | Sep 1978 | A |
4947610 | Koerner | Aug 1990 | A |
4965978 | Scheiwiller | Oct 1990 | A |
5347787 | Gavin | Sep 1994 | A |
5595039 | Lowery | Jan 1997 | A |
D382463 | Cloud | Aug 1997 | S |
5685682 | Glime | Nov 1997 | A |
6385938 | Gavin | May 2002 | B1 |
6571526 | Queen | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6996945 | Doty | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7404274 | Hayes | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7451579 | Azarin | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7726090 | Verelli | Jun 2010 | B2 |
8327599 | Gavin | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8955282 | Yap Ching | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9303400 | Maeers | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9605429 | Yang | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9745752 | Strabala | Aug 2017 | B2 |
D876928 | Cramer | Mar 2020 | S |
11174614 | Flint | Nov 2021 | B2 |
20040040249 | Herbison | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20130212956 | Olaes | Aug 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
42628 | Feb 2005 | CL |
3428148 | Feb 1986 | DE |
2862993 | Jun 2005 | FR |
2363807 | Jan 2002 | GB |
101386209 | Apr 2014 | KR |
101493939 | Feb 2015 | KR |
WO-0222978 | Mar 2002 | WO |
WO-2007021090 | Feb 2007 | WO |
WO-2010012050 | Feb 2010 | WO |
2015181582 | Dec 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Machine Translation of KR 101493939B1, http://engpat.kipris.or.kr/engpat/biblioa.do?method=biblioFrame, May 5, 2021 (Year: 2021). |
Machine Translation of KR 101386209B1, http://engpat.kipris.or.kr/engpat/biblioa.do?method=biblioFrame, May 5, 2021 (Year: 2021). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, International Patent Application PCT/CL2016/50026, dated Dec. 20, 2016 (8 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190292801 A1 | Sep 2019 | US |