The present invention relates to a device for controlling a driven moving element, for example a door.
In known embodiments, the closing of sliding doors is monitored by means of sensors which can detect an object in the path of movement of a door leaf, that is to say that the sensor ascertains whether or not an object is present. A further differentiation does not take place.
Accordingly, when an object is detected, the sliding door is always opened completely. In winter, however, the problem arises of keeping a sliding door closed, if possible, in order to avoid heat losses from rooms that can be entered via the sliding door.
One known solution for losing less heat in such situations consists in not opening the door completely. Since persons expect the door to open completely, a collision between persons and the door that has not been completely opened regularly occurs.
The present invention is based on the object of improving the control of a driven moving element by means of an optical sensor with regard to the opening and/or closing behavior.
The present invention is based on a device for controlling a driven moving element, for example a door, which device comprises an electronic unit with an object sensor. The heart of the invention resides in the fact that the electronic unit is designed, by means of the object sensor, to determine an object distance between the driven moving element and an object in the region of the moving element and to control the movement of the moving element depending on said object distance. By virtue of this measure, a sliding door, for example, can always be opened only precisely in such a way that an approaching object passing through the door, for example a person, can pass through the sliding door without any collisions. Accordingly, in winter, for example, the opening states and the degree of opening of the sliding door can be reduced to a minimum, whereby unnecessary heat losses from rooms that are entered through the sliding door can largely be avoided. The object sensor can be e.g. an optical sensor, a sensor for other electromagnetic waves, e.g. radar waves, and/or a sensor for sound waves, e.g. ultrasonic waves.
In a particularly preferred configuration of the invention, means are provided which determine the object distance from a distance between the object sensor and the object, a distance between the object sensor and the moving element and the angle between the distance directions.
In this way, the object distance is determined indirectly on the basis of two distances including the angle between the distances. As a result, by means of a central object sensor, for example, it is possible to determine any distance between moving element and object provided that the central object sensor can supply information about the distance to the moving element and to the object including the angle between these distances.
In a preferred embodiment, the electronic unit is designed to use a front edge of the moving element as reference at the moving element for determining the object distance. In the case of a door, the distance to the front edge thereof is preferably determined. This approach is based on the fact that the front edge collides first with an object, for example an approaching person, and the object distance should therefore be detected with respect to said front edge.
In a furthermore preferred configuration of the invention, the object sensor comprises a transmitter and receiver for a signal, e.g. for sound or electromagnetic waves, in particular light, wherein the electronic unit is designed to determine a distance which a signal emitted by the transmitter covers via a reflection surface to the receiver, by an evaluation of a signal profile, e.g. in the case of light, of a phase of an oscillation modulated onto the light, and to determine the object distance with this type of distance measurement. In principle, the signal can also appropriately be a pulsed signal, in the case of which e.g. a phase information item is evaluated. However, it is also conceivable, in principle, to evaluate a propagation time information item.
By means of this procedure, an object distance can be detected with comparatively high accuracy. The object distance to a plurality of objects can also be determined. By means of a plurality of measurements it is furthermore possible to calculate the time characteristic of the object distance, that is to say the velocity, such that the object velocity can be incorporated into the control of the driven moving element, for example a door.
Besides the object velocity, it is also possible in this way to determine the velocity of the driven moving element, which is important in the same way for an optimum control of the driven moving element.
In a furthermore preferred configuration of the invention, the electronic unit performs the control of the driven moving element in such a way that the distance between a location of the driven moving element, preferably the front edge of the driven moving element, and the object is kept at least approximately at a predetermined value. Preferably, the object distance is kept at least in sections at a predetermined value. In a preferred configuration, it is expedient to determine the object distance continuously, e.g. multiply per second. In an additionally preferred configuration, the object distance is kept at a predeterminable constant value. Keeping it constant prevents a collision between object and moving element from occurring. It is also possible, however, for the predeterminable value to follow a function. A variation of the predetermined distance depending on the distance between the object and the driven element or a door plane would be conceivable. The predetermined distance can also be made dependent on whether the person is still in front of the door, passing through the door or past the door. The function can also be a discrete function. It is also possible for parameter fields to be predetermined, e.g. a look-up table. For the case where the predeterminable value represents a minimum value, the latter is preferably dependent on the deceleration distance of the driven moving element and/or on empirically determined “feel-good parameters”, that is to say values for which a person passes the driven moving element with a pleasant feeling. The minimum value will advantageously be greater than 10 cm.
In the case of a plurality of moving elements, it is preferred if all the moving elements can be controlled independently. The best possible movement sequences can thereby be obtained for the individual moving elements.
For the case where a plurality of driven moving elements that cannot be moved independently are provided, it is advantageous if the smallest distance determined to a moving element, in particular to the front edge of a moving element, is crucial for the control of the moving elements.
By means of this procedure, at least a partly optimized movement of the moving elements can be achieved in conjunction with a control outlay that has essentially not been increased.
The invention can be applied in particular to sliding doors, leaf doors, vertical doors, folding doors and also windows.
A further improvement in the control of the movement of the driven moving element can be obtained by virtue of the fact that, in an advantageous configuration of the invention, the electronic unit generates a control signal for the control of the driven moving element which takes account of a deceleration distance of the driven moving element. The object distance can thereby be optimized even further with regard to its minimum, which can be utilized positively when reducing opening states, for example of a sliding door.
In order to obtain an even more refined control of the driven moving element with regard to opening and/or closing states of the moving element, it is furthermore proposed that the electronic unit controls the driven moving element in such a way that the moving element, for example a door, is closed as rapidly as possible after an object, for example a person, has passed the moving element, and/or that the moving element, for example a door, is opened as late as possible when an object, for example a person, moves toward the moving element.
In a furthermore preferred configuration of the invention, the electronic unit controls the velocity of the moving element to an inherently undisturbed movement path depending on the object distance. By virtue of this measure, an increased velocity can be predetermined e.g. in the case of comparatively large object distances, the velocity being progressively reduced upon correspondingly approaching the object. The velocity adaptation can be effected e.g. in a stepwise manner.
It is furthermore preferred if the electronic unit performs the control in such a way that if the moving element is blocked for longer than a predetermined time, it ends the closing operation with gentle pressure.
Various exemplary embodiments of the present invention are shown in the drawings and are explained in more detail below with indication of further advantages and details.
a-c show movement states of the two-leaf sliding door according to
The door sensor arrangement 1 detects 3D images of its surroundings. A built-in computer (not illustrated) analyzes the images and determines therefrom the position and velocity of the sliding door leaves 3, 4 and of the object 5.
The positions of the pixels can be determined by means of the vectors 6, 7 and 10. For determining an object distance 11, 12 (see
From a plurality of such measurements, it is additionally possible to determine the relative velocity from the object 5 to the two door leaf edges 8, 9. This makes it possible to foresee if the object would collide with one of the two door leaf edges 8, 9. The door leaves 3, 4 can thus be stopped, possibly separately, in order to avoid a collision. The deceleration distance of the door leaves 3, 4 can additionally be taken into account in this operation. In conventional door controls with a light grating or light curtain, by contrast, only the presence of an object can be ascertained.
a shows the object 5 moving in the direction of sliding door 2. The door sensor arrangement 1 detects the distance 10a to the object 5 and the distances 6a, 7a to the door leaf edges 8, 9. From these distances 6a, 7a, it is possible to calculate the distances 11, 12 between the object 5 and the door edges taking account of the angle between the distances 6a and 10a, and 7a and 10a. The distances 11, 12 are communicated to a door control, whereby the movement and position of the door leaves 3, 4 can be controlled depending on the distances 11, 12.
b shows the situation in which the door leaf 3 is partly closed, for example in order that less warm air (symbolized by the arrows W) can escape from a room that is entered through the door 2. In this case, not only the current position of the object 5 but also the velocity thereof and the velocity of the door leaves 3, 4 are taken into account.
For the case where the door leaves 3, 4 cannot be moved separately, the control can be established in such a way that that door leaf which would cause a collision with the object 5 the most rapidly is crucial.
If the object has passed through the door 2, as shown in
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2005 018 231 | Apr 2005 | DE | national |
10 2005 023 774 | May 2005 | DE | national |
This application is a continuation of International Application No. PCT/EP2006/003577 having an international filing date of Apr. 19, 2006, which designated the United States, and claims the benefit under 35 USC §119(a)-(d) of German Application No. 10 2005 018 231.3, filed Apr. 19, 2005, and German Application No. 10 2005 023 774.6, filed May 19, 2005, the entireties of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4029176 | Mills | Jun 1977 | A |
RE30719 | Mills | Aug 1981 | E |
4815046 | Dorr | Mar 1989 | A |
4967083 | Kornbrekke et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
5001557 | Begle | Mar 1991 | A |
5420430 | Trett | May 1995 | A |
5541585 | Duhame et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5583405 | Sai et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5627439 | Gregory et al. | May 1997 | A |
5692061 | Sasada et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5884237 | Kanki et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5963000 | Tsutsumi et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6304178 | Hayashida | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6329774 | Ariav | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6345105 | Nitta et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6452353 | Calamatas | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6678999 | Zengguang et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6756910 | Ohba et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6782660 | Takada et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6970085 | Okabe et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7045764 | Beggs et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7332999 | Fitzgibbon | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7400744 | Nichani et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7623674 | Nichani et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7762022 | Stadler et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
20020118114 | Ohba et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20040200149 | Dickmann et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20060087272 | Matsuyama et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20080092443 | Herman et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 696 670 | Feb 1996 | EP |
03271485 | Dec 1991 | JP |
08-285184 | Nov 1996 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080084300 A1 | Apr 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/EP2006/003577 | Apr 2006 | US |
Child | 11874345 | US |