The present invention relates to an arrangement for controlling a hydraulically driven motor.
In certain applications, hydraulic motors work under load which varies greatly over time, which has hitherto involved problems by virtue of the fact that the inertia in a conventional hydraulic system can mean that the hydraulic liquid flow is not sufficient for supplying the motor. Another critical situation with a risk of cavitation damage is when the motor is actuated into stop position.
The object of the present invention is to eliminate the problems indicated in the introduction so that the motor can be controlled so as to perform its tasks with maximum effectiveness.
Said object is achieved by means of an arrangement according to the present invention.
The invention will be explained in greater detail below by means of an illustrative embodiment with reference to accompanying drawings, in which
A hydraulic system in which the arrangement according to the invention can be applied is accordingly shown in the example according to
The flow control valve 7 according to the invention is connected downstream of the hydraulic motor 2 on its outlet side 5 and has, in addition to the start/stop function, a constant flow function which is adapted so as, when the actuator valve 6 is in operating position and hydraulic flow passes through the flow control valve, to maintain an essentially constant hydraulic flow through the hydraulic motor 2, in principle irrespective of load variations of the motor. The throughflow of the flow control valve 7 is adapted to vary its throughflow area depending on the prevailing flow. In the example, this is sensed by sensing pressure drop across a following change in area, for example a narrowing 15, in the main duct 1 via a control duct 16 and via a control duct 22, which is connected to the main line 1 upstream of the narrowing 15, in which way the flow through the motor is controlled by means of the flow control valve depending on the pressure difference across the narrowing. The pressure-sensing upstream of the narrowing is led via the actuator valve 6. However, the narrowing can alternatively be positioned in locations in the system other than downstream of the constant flow valve, as is shown in the figure, for example upstream of the motor 2 or between the motor and the valve. Connected around the motor 2 is a shunt line 24, which includes a non-return valve 25, which is adapted for relieving pressure by being capable of opening in the event of pressure surges on the outlet side of the motor.
An example of an embodiment of the flow control valve 7 is shown in
The functioning of the hydraulic system will now be described with reference to all the figures. The general operating requirement for the invention is that as constant an optimized speed as possible of the motor 2 and its output rotation shaft 3 is to be maintained during normal operation and that extreme, instantaneous changes in speed are to be counteracted to as great an extent as possible, in spite of instantaneous load fall-off. An example of such an application is therefore sawing through a log 23, where the risk of what is known as racing arises owing to accumulated energy in hoses etc. symbolized by v, when the log has been sawn through and the load falls off. This is achieved by the flow control valve 7 being dimensioned to work with a rapid response and by this valve being positioned downstream of the motor 2, that is to say on its outlet side 5. When the actuator valve 6 is in stop position, the flow control valve 7 is controlled so as to be closed by the action of system pressure, that is to say full fluid pressure via the control duct 17, and control pressure from the control duct 20 counter to the action of the force from the valve spring 18. In the stop position, the pump pressure acts via the control duct 20 and via one control input 28 of the control valve 7 on one side 32 of the slide, which results in the slide 26 moving into end position and shutting off the entire main flow (see
When the actuator valve 6 is adjusted from stop position to start position/acceleration position, the flow control valve 7 is opened by the spring 18 and is kept open because the control area is now acted on by the pressure in the control duct 22, which, in the start position, is the same as in the control duct 16 (see
During operation, the flow control valve 7 works as a constant flow valve, the aim being to keep the hydraulic fluid flow through the flow control valve, and thus through the motor 2, constant by virtue of the valve being fully open when the flow is too low, and seeking to throttle the flow, that is to say brake the motor, when the flow is too high. If load-sensing is present, system pressure is sensed, which provides maximum flow. On stopping, the motor is braked on the rear side by the actuator valve 6 being adjusted to stop position again, the flow control valve 7 then being adjusted to closed position.
In the case of both constant flow control and stopping, the hydraulic fluid pressure at the motor inlet 4 is guaranteed the whole time by the system according to the invention, in contrast to known solutions with a compensator and a stop valve before the motor, where there is a risk of the motor running faster than the flow is sufficient for and thus rotating like a cavitating pump. By virtue of the start/stop function and the constant flow function being integrated in one and the same valve component, a compact construction and short fluid ducts for the main flow, especially between the valve and the motor, are made possible. For example, the valve can be integrated with the motor block, that is to say the motor housing.
The invention is not limited to the examples described above and shown in the drawings but can be varied within the scope of the patent claims below. For example, the load can be a linear motor, such as a piston cylinder. The flow control valve 7 can have a different construction; for example, the valve body can be adapted to be rotated under the action of two counteracting start flows, the throughflow passage then being designed differently.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0300760 | Mar 2003 | SE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/SE2004/000407 | 3/19/2004 | WO | 00 | 9/19/2005 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2004/083652 | 9/30/2004 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2795933 | McCallum | Jun 1957 | A |
2878015 | Panissidi | Mar 1959 | A |
2884902 | Headings | May 1959 | A |
3543646 | Iijima | Dec 1970 | A |
4051764 | Murata | Oct 1977 | A |
4364827 | Guttman | Dec 1982 | A |
4722258 | Johnson | Feb 1988 | A |
6026730 | Yoshida et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6041683 | Timperi et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6220027 | Heusser | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6244158 | Roche | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6986368 | Brown | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7017460 | Virvalo et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060249015 A1 | Nov 2006 | US |