Patent Grant
11959467
The invention relates to a device for controlling a piston pump unit for liquid chromatography, in particular for high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Furthermore, the invention relates to a piston pump unit having such a control device.
Pumps for HPLC are to deliver the lowest possible pulsation or even completely pulsation-free flow under high pressure. For this purpose, pumps are used which operate according to the displacement principle using cyclically acting pistons. To bridge the period of time of the intake, pumps are used having a first and second head or a first and second piston-cylinder unit. Both piston-cylinder units can be arranged in parallel from a fluidic aspect, wherein the drives for the pistons are activated such that one piston always delivers while the other piston suctions. Such an arrangement is described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 4,752,385 A.
Instead, the two piston-cylinder units can also be arranged in series in a fluidic aspect, wherein the drives for the pistons are activated in this case such that during an intake phase of the first piston, the second piston delivers and during the intake phase of the second piston, the first piston delivers and simultaneously the cylinder volume of the second piston-cylinder unit fills. Such a pump unit is described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 4,681,513 A.
In both variants of double-piston pumps, the problem exists that, during the changeover from one piston-cylinder unit to the respective other piston-cylinder unit, for various physical and technical reasons, a drop can occur in the profile of the system pressure measurable at the outlet of the pump unit (and therefore also of the flow) or deviations can occur of the actual profile of the system pressure or the flow from a desired (idealized) constant system pressure or flow. One cause of this can be heating of the liquid medium to be delivered during a substantially adiabatic compression. This problem will be explained hereafter on the basis of the example of a serial double-piston pump according to
The double-piston pump unit 1 shown in
In a second phase following the intake phase, which is designated as the pre-compression phase, the working piston 11 moves forward to bring the previously suctioned-in liquid to the same high system pressure which prevails at the outlet port 30 of the pump unit 1 and in the free volume 22 of the equalizing head 20. The inlet valve 15 closes. The outlet valve 16 initially also remains closed. This procedure is designated as pre-compression, since the liquid must be considered to be compressible at the high pressures typical in HPLC. During the pre-compression, the equalizing piston 21 furthermore maintains the flow or system pressure. The pre-compression phase ends when the pressure in the working head 10 has reached the system pressure, so that the outlet valve 16 opens and both free volumes 12 and 22 are connected to the outlet capillary 30 (it is to be noted here that the valves 15,16 are implemented as check valves). During the pre-compression phase, the working piston 11 covers a pre-compression path, which is dependent on the compressibility of the liquid and on the pressure in the equalizing head 20 (i.e., the system pressure).
In a subsequent third phase, the outlet valve 16 is open, so that both the movement of the equalizing piston 21 and also of the working piston 11 contribute to the total flow provided at the outlet port 30 of the pump unit 1. To avoid an undesired increase of the total flow, the piston speeds must therefore be adapted such that the desired total flow again results in sum at the pump outlet. The way this is precisely performed is dependent on the precise technical implementation of the pump. In any case, the equalizing piston 21 must be retracted in a timely manner before beginning the next pump cycle or the next intake phase to fill the equalizing head 20 again. This is performed in pumps according to the prior art either in the third phase or an additional fourth phase. For the understanding of the invention, it is only decisive that the flow provided at the pump outlet in the third phase and optionally fourth phase is dependent on the sum (having the correct sign) of the two piston speeds. The phases following the pre-compression phase are generally designated hereafter in summary as the delivery phase independently of the precise technical implementation.
It is problematic in such cyclically operating double-piston pump units, independently of whether they are parallel or serial pump units, that during the pre-compression, compression work is carried out on the liquid, which is located in the free volume 12 of the working head 10, which can result in heating of this liquid if the pre-compression occurs so rapidly that sufficient heat dissipation cannot occur during the pre-compression phase. This compression work is greater the higher the pressure and the compressibility of the liquid are. Therefore, the pre-compressed liquid in the working head 10 is warmer after the pre-compression than the working head 10 and the working piston 11.
After the pre-compression, no further compression work is supplied, since the pressure in the free volume 12 of the working head 10 remains substantially constant after the opening of the outlet valve 16. The previously heated liquid cools down especially at the beginning of the delivery phase by the contact with the surrounding components of the pump, so that its volume decreases.
This volume contraction decreases the flow provided in this time, which results in a temporary drop of the provided flow or the system pressure. This repeats with each pump cycle and is noticeable overall as an undesired periodic flow pulsation or pressure pulsation at the outlet port of the pump unit. In the case of high-pressure gradient pumps, in which different solvents are mixed by multiple individual pumps, such pulsations are additionally noticeable as variations of the solvent composition. All of these effects result in worsening of the chromatographic reproducibility, which represents an important criterion for the quality of a chromatography system.
Heretofore, various possibilities have been proposed to reduce the pulsation produced by heating of the liquid medium to be delivered during the pre-compression phase and subsequent cooling during the delivery phase. A method is described in GB 2 446 321 A, in which the problem is avoided in that the cooling procedure is displaced to a point in time at which no interfering effects are still to be expected. For this purpose, a sufficiently long waiting time is incorporated in the pre-compression phase after approximately 90-95% of the pre-compression to permit the liquid to cool again. Since the outlet valve is still closed at this point in time, the volume contraction does not have an effect on the flow or pressure provided at the pump outlet. After the cooling, the remainder of the pre-compression is executed and the liquid is pumped into the system with thermal equilibrium.
This solution has the disadvantage that a specific minimum waiting time is necessary, since the duration of the cooling is primarily determined by the heat conduction of the material of the piston chamber and the liquid. These must be dimensioned such that the liquid also cools down sufficiently strongly under unfavorable circumstances to avoid the problem. This waiting time lengthens the pre-compression phase and therefore the cycle time of the pump. This decreases the maximum flow rate of a pump.
Furthermore, this solution necessarily requires a measurement of the pressure in the working head, which means additional expenditure. In addition, this solution can only be applied if the drives for working piston and equalizing piston are independent, which also results in additional expenditure.
US 2010/0275678 A1 describes a method using a pressure controller, which is to equalize the pressure drop by appropriately superimposed piston movements. For this purpose, the time profile of the system pressure at the pump outlet is already recorded before the expected pressure drop, i.e., for example, in the intake phase and/or pre-compression phase, and an expected pressure profile in a time window at the beginning of the delivery phase is calculated therefrom. At the beginning of the delivery phase, a pressure controller is then activated, which controls the piston speeds in a certain time interval such that the actual pressure profile corresponds to that expected.
This solution has the disadvantage that the pressure controller reacts sensitively with respect to interference from the outside, i.e., with respect to externally induced deviations from the expected pressure profile. These can be caused by the other pumps in the case of a high-pressure gradient pump assembly, for example. This must be avoided by a synchronization of the individual pumps, so that the method cannot be applied to conventional high-pressure gradient pumps having camshaft drive.
The equalizing of pulsations after the pre-compression by a pressure controller is also described in GB 2 433 792 B. This patent corresponds to the basic concept of above-discussed US 2010/0275678 A1. In addition, however, it is proposed here that a flow resistance be incorporated between working head and equalizing head to decouple the pressure in the working head from the pressure in the equalizing head.
This solution also has the above-described disadvantages. The use of an additional flow resister additionally causes the disadvantage that its effect is strongly dependent on the respectively set pump flow.
Proceeding from the above-mentioned prior art, the invention is based on the object of providing a device for controlling a piston pump unit for liquid chromatography, in particular for high-performance liquid chromatography, which avoids or strongly reduces flow pulsations or pressure pulsations or variations of the solvent composition, which are caused by thermal effects arising during the compression phase and during the subsequent part of the delivery phase, in a simple manner. Furthermore, the invention is based on the object of providing a multiple-piston pump unit having such a control device.
The invention proceeds from the finding that the action of the thermal effects, which result in the undesired flow pulsation or pressure pulsation, can be ascertained beforehand and then compensated for by appropriately corrected piston speeds. The piston speeds are corrected by a previously calculated correction amplitude, so that the undesired flow pulsation or pressure pulsation is substantially avoided. The control unit is implemented to detect the pressure of the medium in at least one of the piston-cylinder units during the pre-compression phase and/or to detect the system pressure during the part of the delivery phase in which the cooling of the adiabatically heated medium can result in influence of the flow. The pressure detection can be used by means of typical pressure sensors, which have a fluidic connection to the relevant piston-cylinder unit. The control unit controls the piston speed of at least one piston-cylinder unit during the transition phase, in which a pressure drop would result without a correction, depending on at least one characteristic, which is ascertained from chronologically previously detected pressure values, such that variations of the system pressure as a result of the cooling of the adiabatically heated medium are at least partially compensated for.
Since suitable pressure sensors are provided in practically all already known multiple-piston pumps and these pumps also have program-controlled control units, the invention can also be implemented in existing pumps in the form of a software update or firmware update. A hardware modification of the pumps is typically not necessary for this purpose.
The control according to the invention does not require a complex control mechanism, which can additionally also be accompanied by the risk that instabilities of the control loop will occur upon the occurrence of external interfering influences.
In addition, the invention can be implemented in a simple manner such that interfering pulsations are reduced or completely avoided automatically and independently of the physical properties of the liquid used.
According to one embodiment of the invention, the control unit, while using the at least one characteristic, can ascertain a correction guideline for the control of the piston speed of at least one of the piston-cylinder units during the transition phase, which determines the flow during the transition phase, wherein the correction guideline is preferably superimposed by addition on an activation guideline for the relevant piston, which does not consider compensation of the cooling of the adiabatically heated medium. The thermal influence to be reduced can therefore be integrated in a simple manner in an existing guideline for activating the drive device for the piston.
The correction guideline can comprise a decreasing exponential function of the type vk=c·exp[(t−t2)/τ] or of the type vk=c·exp[(x−xII)/ε], wherein t2 designates the chronological beginning of the transition phase of the delivery phase, c designates the amplitude of this correction function at the point in time t=t2, τ designates the time constant of the correction function, x designates the position of the piston, and xII designates the starting position for the transition phase of the delivery phase.
The correction guideline can also comprise a substantially ramped or stepped function, which has a sudden or ramped increase, a middle region having a substantially constant value of a determined maximum amplitude, and a sudden or ramped decrease. It has surprisingly been shown that in particular while using such a sudden or ramped function in addition to a decreasing exponential function, the drop of the pressure or flow may be corrected by means of a simple controller without closed control loop.
The front flank of the ramped or stepped function can be permanently associated with a predefined piston position. This can be determined by means of simulation or also empirically. This is also true for the width of the ramped or stepped function.
According to one embodiment of the invention, the control unit detects the pressure of the medium in the cylinder volume of the compressing piston-cylinder unit in an initial phase of the compression phase, in which substantially no heating of the medium by the adiabatic compression has yet occurred, and extrapolates the pressure profile as a function of the time or the position of the relevant piston. Subsequently, the control unit calculates the point in time t1 or the position of the piston xI, at which this extrapolated curve, which represents an isothermal profile, reaches a value for the system pressure which would result in the case of an idealized isothermal compression at the end of the compression phase. The control unit can then ascertain the point in time t2 or the position xII of the relevant piston at which the pre-compression phase is ended, and can use, as a characteristic for determining the at least one parameter of the correction guideline, the difference of the calculated time t1 and the detected time t2 or the difference of the calculated position xI and the detected position xII.
In this case, the control unit, for determining the point in time t1 or the position of the piston xI, at which the extrapolated curve reaches the value for the system pressure, which would result in the event of an idealized thermal compression at the end of the compression phase, can detect the system pressure of the medium prevailing at the outlet of the pump unit in a range before the beginning of the delivery phase depending on the time or on the position of the piston, and extrapolate it, preferably linearly, and determine the intersection point of this extrapolated curve for the system pressure with the calculated curve, which represents the isothermal profile, for the pressure in the relevant volume of the compressing piston-cylinder unit.
According to another variant, the control unit, to determine the point in time t1 or the position of the piston xI, at which the extrapolated curve reaches the value for the system pressure, which would result in the case of an idealized, thermal compression at the end of the compression phase, can also use a constant value for the system pressure, which is supplied to the control unit or which the control unit detects during the compression phase, preferably shortly before the end of the compression phase.
According to a further embodiment of the invention, the control unit, to determine the point in time t2 or the position xII of the relevant piston, can detect the pressure during the pre-compression phase depending on the time or on the position of the piston in a range in which the influence of the heating is displayed, preferably until a point shortly before the end of the compression phase, and can extrapolate this pressure profile. The control unit can detect the system pressure of the medium, which prevails at the outlet of the pump unit, in a range before the beginning of the delivery phase depending on the time or the position of the piston and extrapolate it, preferably linearly, and determine the point in time t2 or the position xII of the relevant piston from the relevant intersection point of the two extrapolated curves for the system pressure and the pressure in the volume of the relevant piston-cylinder unit. The control unit preferably ascertains the correction guideline before the end of the pre-compression phase and uses this to control the drive device during the directly following delivery phase.
The above-mentioned variants for determining the parameters for the correction guideline have the advantage that all parameters can be determined already immediately before a coming pressure drop, so that the immediately following pressure drop can already be corrected by control.
According to another alternative, the control unit can detect the system pressure of the medium during the transition phase, in which the cooling of the medium heated during the compression phase occurs, and can use the deviation of the system pressure, which is detected during the transition phase, from an idealized system pressure as the characteristic for determining the at least one parameter of the correction guideline.
The control unit can determine the idealized system pressure during the transition phase according to one of the following alternatives:
According to one embodiment of the invention, the control unit can determine the maximum deviation of the detected system pressure from the idealized system pressure and can determine at least one parameter of the correction guideline depending on the maximum deviation.
In the case of these variants, the control unit can use the correction guideline thus ascertained in the control of the drive device during at least one delivery phase, which follows the delivery phase, the transition phase of which is used to determine the at least one parameter of the correction guideline.
The control unit can preferably determine the value of the at least one parameter iteratively in such a manner that in transition phases of successive cycles, preferably directly successive cycles, respectively one value for the relevant parameter is determined and combined by computer, preferably added with the correct sign.
If an exponential function is used to correct the pressure drop, as described above, the control unit can determine the amplitude c of the exponential function depending on the at least one characteristic. If a ramped or stepped (i.e., a rectangular) function is additionally used, the control unit can thus determine the maximum amplitude of the ramped or stepped function proportionally to the amplitude c of the exponential function.
The invention will be explained in greater detail hereafter on the basis of exemplary embodiments shown in the drawing. In the drawing.
The serial double-piston pump unit shown in
The signals of the pressure sensors 13 of the first piston-cylinder unit 3 and of the second piston-cylinder unit 5 are supplied to the control unit 32 of the pump unit 1 in
To solve the problem described at the beginning, of avoiding a pressure drop as a result of cooling of the liquid medium, which is heated in the pre-compression phase and is to be delivered by the pump unit, the control unit detects the pressure or pressure profile (depending on the time or the position of the relevant piston) and ascertains parameters of a correction guideline therefrom, which is used to control the piston speed during the phase in which the pressure drop would occur without correction.
Two specific solution variants according to the invention are to be described in more detail hereafter, which originate from this general solution:
The first solution variant will be explained on the basis of
This variant proceeds from the finding that during a rapid compression of a liquid to high pressure, as occurs in the pre-compression phase, a substantially adiabatic state change occurs, since the resulting compression heat is only dissipated in a very small part in the short time. In contrast, if one observes only a slight compression, the temperature of the liquid hardly changes, so that the state change can be considered to be nearly isothermal, even if the compression occurs rapidly.
As a result, during the pre-compression phase, as a result of the rapid compression, the pressure increase in the lower pressure range runs approximately isothermally, and the adiabatic state change is only noticeable at higher pressures. The difference between isothermal and adiabatic state change is ascertained according to the invention by analysis of the actual pressure profile as a function of the performed compression. This is explained hereafter as an example on the basis of
Until the point in time t0, the pump unit 1 is in the intake phase. During this, the pressure in the working head 10 corresponds to the ambient pressure or zero and is therefore coincident with the time axis. The system pressure psys is assumed to be constant in this example during the intake phase and pre-compression phase. This is indicated by the line 40.
The pre-compression phase begins at the point in time t0. At this point in time, a well-defined liquid quantity is located in the volume 12 of the working head, and both valves 15 and 16 are closed. Proceeding from this point, the liquid is compressed in the working head.
In a hypothetical, isothermal case, i.e., without consideration of heating, the pressure would rise linearly corresponding to curve 43, presuming a linear pre-compression, i.e., a movement of the working piston at constant speed. In this case, the pressure in the working head at a point in time t1 would reach the system pressure psys. At this point in time, the outlet valve would open and the delivery phase begins, as described above.
In the real case, an adiabatic state change occurs during the pre-compression, since the liquid in the volume 12 of the working head 10 heats up due to the pre-compression. Because the volume in the working head 10 is determined by the piston position at every point in time between t0 and t1, the temperature increase as a result of the lack of a possibility for volume expansion results in an additional pressure increase, so that the pressure profile in the working head follows the profile 42 in
To avoid such a pressure drop, the difference between the points in time t1 and t2 is determined in this first variant. The point in time t2 can be ascertained in a simple manner by extrapolation of the real pressure profile, since at this point in time the curve 42 (i.e., the detected pressure profile during the compression phase) reaches the system pressure psys. This is known per se and has already been used for some time. The point in time t1 results from the hypothetical, isothermal case, and can also be ascertained from the real pressure profile according to curve 43. This is possible, since in the lower pressure range, no noteworthy heating has yet occurred and therefore, in this range, the curve 42 and the curve 43 run nearly identically. Thus, a measuring interval t3 to t4 can be established, in which the pressure is between a lower pressure p3 and an upper pressure p4, wherein, even at the selected pressure p4, no relevant temperature increase can yet have occurred as a result of the provided compression work. In principle, the pressure p3 can be selected to be equal to the ambient pressure. In this case, t3=t0 would then be the case.
Expediently, however, the pressure p3 is selected to be at least somewhat greater than the ambient pressure, since in this way the influence of interfering effects such as air bubbles or mechanical play of the drive, for example, can be reduced. The pressure p4 is selected to be significantly greater than p3, however, as mentioned above, at most sufficiently large that adiabatic heating effects are still negligible. Reasonable values for p3 are in the range from 2 MPa to 10 MPa, in particular between 7 MPa and 10 MPa. Reasonable values for p4 are between 10 MPa and 20 MPa, in particular between 12 MPa and 15 MPa. Of course, these values are also dependent to a certain extent on the type of the liquid.
The pressure profile in the measuring interval t3 to t4 is linearly extrapolated to obtain the curve 43, which corresponds to an isothermal state change. The extrapolation line can be calculated using the conventional mathematical methods (for example, linear approximation) from the pressure profile in the measuring interval. In the simplest case, only the measurement points at the beginning and at the end of the measurement interval are considered for this purpose. The intersection point of the extrapolation line or curve 43 with the system pressure psys corresponds to the point in time t1 to be determined.
The time difference Δt=t1−t2 is a measure of the heating of the liquid during the pre-compression and therefore a measure of the pressure drop to be expected as a result of the cooling and can therefore be used to calculate a correction amplitude c of the piston speed. This correction amplitude is subsequently used to increase the flow, which is provided by both pistons together, in a time interval following t2 during the delivery phase and thus to avoid the flow drop or pressure drop 45.
The performance of the correction will be explained on the basis of
The speed v0 according to the line 70 in
For the correction of the piston speed, this (uncorrected) speed or the relevant (uncorrected) speed profile (as a function of the time or the piston position) is superimposed with a correction component 71 according to
The exponential profile reflects the cooling procedure, which theoretically also follows a decreasing exponential function. By way of the superposition of the correction component 71, which is determined in a suitable manner, the pressure drop 45 is equalized, so that the system pressure follows the profile 41 beyond the point in time t2.
Experiments have shown that from a specific location position of the working piston, which is reached here at the point in time 72, an additional improvement can be achieved by a further correction component 74. This is a stepped or rectangular function, which is active in a specific range in the time interval 72 to 73 and has a constant value here. Since the point in time 72 corresponds to a fixed piston position, this is later the lower the set target flow. The height of the step can preferably be selected to be proportional to the above-mentioned correction amplitude c of the exponential profile of the correction component and/or additionally proportional to the system pressure psys. It has proven to be advantageous to use, as the amplitude of the step per 100 MPa, approximately 0.9 times the previously calculated correction amplitude c. The time length of the correction component 74 preferably extends until the end of the delivery phase (point in time 73) or until the beginning of the following intake phase. Of course, it can however also be adapted by simulation or empirically to the respective conditions (in particular the mechanical and thermal properties of the pump unit 1).
Instead of a solely stepped component, another shape can also be selected, which can be found by simulation or empirically. For example, a ramped function is also conceivable having a ramped increase and a similar decrease.
The sum of the correction components 71 and 74 causes the pressure drop 45 to be practically completely equalized during the delivery phase. By way of the addition of the two corrections 71 and 74, the curve 75 results for the total speed of the two pistons 11 and 21, as shown in
This method stabilizes flow or pressure of the pump. In the case of high-pressure gradient pumps, the mixing ratio of the solvent is also maintained more stably. The chromatographic reproducibility therefore improves.
Furthermore, the method does not require any additional sensors and can thus be implemented without a hardware change, solely as a firmware solution. In this way, even existing pumps can be retrofitted. A further advantage is that the method automatically functions for all conventional liquids, without specifications about material constants of the liquid being necessary. In relation to known solutions, no heat exchanger or additional flow resistance is necessary. Since a pure controller in the strict sense is used (i.e., a closed control loop is intentionally omitted), complex control technology which is susceptible to malfunction is not necessary.
The second variant, which is described hereafter, for correction of the piston speed during the delivery phase, in particular in the starting phase thereof, is also suitable for those pumps in which no sensor 13 is provided for measuring the pressure in the working head. In this case, an analysis of the pressure profile 42 in the working head, as in the case of the above-described alternative, is not possible. As explained hereafter, the correction value can be ascertained on the basis of the pressure profile at the pump outlet port 30, however (by means of the sensor 23).
The upper curve in
In the second alternative for the correction of the piston speed according to
The pressure difference 531 is, similarly to the procedure in the case of the above-described first alternative, used as a measure for the determination or calculation of a correction amplitude c (see the curve 55 for the correction amplitude c in c (see the curve 52 for the change
c in
The amplitude change c, which is determined based on the pressure drop 561 or the detected pressure difference 531, is added to the current value of the total amplitude c to determine the total amplitude c (or optionally used to calculate the amplitude value c according to another mathematical guideline). This results in the value 521 shown in
c of the correction amplitude. The value 551 for the correction amplitude c is still also equal to the value 521 for
c at this point in time, since c was previously still equal to zero. The value 521 for c is used to correct the pressure drop to be expected in the next pump cycle. The correction guideline, which preferably consists of the combination of the exponentially decreasing component with the stepped component, is also determined using the value for c, as in the case of the above-described first alternative. As a result of the correction, the next pressure drop 562 shown in
The above-described method is now again applied. The extrapolated pressure profile 542 is compared to the measured pressure profile 512 of the next pressure drop 562. A correction amplitude change c, which is designated with 522 in
This is also performed for the next pressure drop 563. The extrapolated pressure profile 543 is compared to the measured pressure profile 513 of the pressure drop 563. A correction amplitude change c, which is designated in
This procedure is repeated with each cycle, wherein an iterative determination of the correction amplitude c is performed.
In the simplest case, the calculation of the change c of the correction amplitude c can be performed by a proportional relationship between
c and the measured pressure drop 531, 532, 533. The factor between the measured pressure drop and the change of the correction amplitude
c is then dependent on the construction of the pump, for example, the piston diameter, and on the selected units for speed and pressure. Therefore, generally valid specifications for the factor are not possible. However, the most favorable factor can be empirically ascertained and it can thus be established that an occurring pressure drop will be equalized in particular as far as possible as early as in the next cycle.
During the start of the pump, it can begin, as shown in
Since high-pressure gradient pumps consist of two or more double-piston pumps connected in parallel, mutual influence of the individual pumps can occur here. Since high-pressure gradient pumps typically have a pressure sensor in the working head in any case, however, the above-described first alternative is preferable for them.
The embodiments presented up to this point relate to an individual serial double-piston pump, as shown in
The present invention may be applied not only to serial double-piston pumps, but rather also to parallel double-piston pumps, for example, as are known from the patent specification U.S. Pat. No. 4,753,581. Parallel double-piston pumps do not operate with one working piston and one equalizing piston, but rather both pistons alternately provide the flow. For this purpose, the valves 15 and 16 must be provided twice, i.e., respectively for both pump heads. The two individually produced flows of the pistons 11 and 21 are guided together after the two outlet valves 16 via a T-piece adapter, the third connection of which represents the pump outlet 30. Parallel double-piston pumps also require a pre-compression before the relevant outlet valve 16 opens and discharges liquid to the remaining system. During and after the pre-compression, the same procedures play out as in the case of a serial double-piston pump. The correction amplitude can therefore be ascertained in the same manner as described above.
The application of the calculated correction can also be performed in the same manner as described above, by correspondingly correcting the speeds of one piston or both pistons.
Furthermore, the invention may advantageously be applied to multiple individual pumps connected in parallel. Each of these individual pumps can in turn optionally be implemented as a serial or parallel double-piston pump. Such a parallel connection of two or more individual pumps is used, for example, to produce and mix multiple different solvent flows (for example, high-pressure gradient pumps). The invention may then be applied to each of the participating individual pumps in the above-described manner.
Both in the case of serial and also parallel double-piston pumps, both pistons can be actuated by a shared drive (for example, camshaft) or by independent drives (for example, spindle drives). In both cases, the effects of the adiabatic pre-compression are evaluated according to the invention on the basis of the pressure signals and the piston position and/or the time, as described above. In the case of pumps having a shared drive for both pistons, the correction is carried out according to the invention by changing the drive speed, whereby both piston speeds can change. In the case of pumps having independent drives, the correction can optionally be carried out with one of the two pistons or also with both pistons, in contrast.
Furthermore, the invention is applicable to pumps having variable amplitude of the cyclic piston stroke. Such pumps change the stroke of the piston cycle as a function of internal control parameters, for example, the set flow rate. Piston positions are driven in a defined manner and pressures are recorded. The fundamental problem of the invention also occurs in the case of these pumps during or after the pre-compression and can similarly be solved in the same manner as described above.
The pressure sensors do not necessarily have to be arranged in the pump heads for the application of the invention. Thus, for example, the pressure sensor 23 for measuring the pressure in the system does not have to be arranged directly in the equalizing head, but rather must only have a fluidic connection thereto. As a result, in the case of multiple pumps connected in parallel, a single, shared sensor is sufficient for measuring the system pressure.
Instead of pressure sensors, the pressures can also be determined indirectly. For example, forces or deformations of components can be detected for this purpose and a corresponding pressure can be concluded depending on the directly detected physical variables.
It is not necessary for the pre-compression to occur linearly, i.e., at constant piston speed, for the application of the invention. In the case of nonlinear embodiment of the pre-compression, deviations from a linear profile can either be taken into consideration by computer, or calculations are performed using piston positions instead of times. This is possible because for all mentioned effects, the relationship between time and pressure is less relevant than the relationship between piston position and pressure.
In the practical application, this means that, for example, in
One variant of the invention may be implemented if the pump has a fluidic connection to a further external system having piston, for example, a high-pressure injection system. In this case, the actual pump can communicate the dimension of the expected pressure drop and the point in time thereof to the external system. The pump itself does not change the piston speed. For this purpose, the external piston executes a change of its position to equalize the flow error, which would be displayed as a pressure pulsation 45 or 56, respectively, and uses the values of the correction amplitude and time constant for this purpose for the control of the movement of this external piston. In the meaning of the present description, this external piston should be associated with the pump unit, wherein the function of a “correction piston” is transferred to the external piston (in addition to other functions possibly assigned to this piston). Thus, for example, a double-piston pump having this associated external piston (which is optionally arranged in the separate system) can be understood as a triple-piston pump or as a double-piston pump having “correction piston”, respectively. The control unit can also be distributed in this case to a control unit associated with the actual double-piston pump or multiple-piston pump and to a further control unit, which is associated with the separate system.
Therefore, the present invention provides a control unit, which implements a method, using which correction parameters for influencing the piston speed(s) of a multiple-piston pump can be automatically determined from the pressure signals of the pump in a simple manner. By applying these correction parameters by means of a simple control, pulsations of the pump can be avoided or greatly reduced, without complicated pressure control loops or additional sensors or other components being necessary for this purpose. The solution according to the invention can be provided easily by firmware and can therefore also be provided for existing devices.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 102011052848.2 | Aug 2011 | DE | national |
This application is a divisional under 35 U.S.C. § 121 and claims the priority benefit of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/239,762, filed Feb. 19, 2014, which is a United States National Stage Application, under 35 U.S.C. § 371, of International Application PCT/DE2012/100193, filed Jul. 2, 2012, entitled “Device for controlling a piston pump unit for liquid chromatography,” which claims the priority benefit to German Patent Application No. 10 2011 052 848.2, filed Aug. 19, 2011, which applications are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4137011 | Rock | Jan 1979 | A |
| 4359312 | Funke et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
| 4492524 | Koch et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
| 4681513 | Saito et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
| 4752385 | Wilson | Jun 1988 | A |
| 4753581 | Hiscock | Jun 1988 | A |
| 4797834 | Honganen et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4810168 | Nogami et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4980059 | Barlow et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
| 5108264 | Abdel-Rahman | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5114314 | Fujimoto | May 1992 | A |
| 5393420 | Hutchins et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5637208 | Dourdeville | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5897781 | Dourdeville | Apr 1999 | A |
| 8182680 | Herzog et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8535016 | Corral et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 20060219618 | Witt et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20080206067 | De Corral | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20090057227 | Kaji et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20100040483 | Berger et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100275678 | Herzog et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100299079 | Berndt et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20110132463 | Witt et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110259451 | Weissgerber | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20120096919 | Choikhet et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20130104631 | Tokuo | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130336803 | Ruegenberg | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 101865109 | Oct 2010 | CN |
| 102112741 | Jun 2011 | CN |
| 3035770 | Aug 1984 | DE |
| 3786224 | Oct 1993 | DE |
| 112005001673 | Oct 2007 | DE |
| 0334994 | Sep 1992 | EP |
| 0264934 | Jun 1993 | EP |
| 2433792 | Jul 2007 | GB |
| 2446321 | Aug 2008 | GB |
| 2446321 | Aug 2008 | GB |
| 2469899 | May 2011 | GB |
| 07072130 | Mar 1995 | JP |
| 2007113432 | May 2007 | JP |
| 2012032187 | Feb 2012 | JP |
| 2006017121 | Feb 2006 | WO |
| 2006103133 | Oct 2006 | WO |
| 2010124741 | Nov 2010 | WO |
| 2011000407 | Jan 2011 | WO |
| 2013026446 | Feb 2013 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Office Action dated Jul. 17, 2014 in corresponding JP application No. 2013-128658. |
| Search Report dated Aug. 11, 2014 in corresponding CN application No. 201310336415.1. |
| Draft German Opposition Against the German Patent 10 2011 052 848 B4, 42 pgs., not dated. |
| Draft Opposition by Agilent Technologies, Opposition against German Patent 10 2011 052 848 B4, 42 pages, undated. |
| Email re DE102011052848B4, 2 pgs., dated Nov. 7, 2017. |
| Foley et al., “Unavoidable Flow-Rate Errors in High-performance Liquid Chromatography,” J. of Chromatography, 478, 287-309, 1989. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20210017970 A1 | Jan 2021 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 14239762 | US | |
| Child | 17063870 | US |
