This application is a national phase entry of international application PCT/EP2016/067517, entitled DEVICE FOR CONTROLLING THE PHYSICAL RESISTANCE FORCE PRODUCED BY A PATIENT, AND PHYSICAL REHABILITATION ASSEMBLY COMPRISING SUCH A DEVICE, filed on Jul. 22, 2016 by applicant Louisin Research and Development Limited, the contents of which are hereby incorporated herein in their entirety.
PCT/EP2016/067517 claims benefit of French Patent Application No. 15 56987, on Jul. 23, 2015, the contents of which are hereby incorporated herein in their entirety.
The present invention relates to a device for controlling the physical resistance forces produced by a patient. The invention also relates to a patient physical rehabilitation assembly comprising such a control device.
In the field of physical preparation or functional rehabilitation, small elastic accessories are commonly used, such as bands commonly called Sandows (trademark) or spring cages. These accessories allow a patient to be worked, sitting or standing, against progressive resistance: to do this, the patient puts the accessory under tension and then maintains this tension without relaxing it for a given period, while being all the time under the supervision of a therapist who ensures that the patient's posture is correct and that the intensity and direction of the resistance efforts produced by the patient are those expected for the required exercise. This technique allows both re-development of the muscles and the performance of proprioceptive work. In addition, this requires little financial investment and equipment, insofar as the aforementioned elastic accessories are inexpensive and take up almost no space. However, to be effective and not lead to muscular or joint demands not adapted to the treated patient, the exercises performed by the patient must be visually controlled by the therapist, so that the patient may not use these accessories independently.
There are also isokinetic machines that are generally used for the rehabilitation of athletes. The associated isokinetic method involves working the patient against resistance through constant velocity movements, wherein the resistance exerted by the isokinetic machine adapts itself to the effort produced by the patient. By virtue of the resistance that the machine regulates, this method makes it possible to obtain maximum muscle contraction at a constant speed, over the total amplitude of a movement. However, isokinetic machines are cumbersome and very expensive, and often only allow the lower limbs of the patient to be worked because the patient is usually sitting on an instrumented seat of the machine.
There are also mechanical devices that incorporate facilities that induce a mechanical resistance which the patient opposes during physical exercises. Examples of such devices are provided in US 2013/172155, US 2004/176226, DE 40 40 123 and U.S. Pat. No. 6,662,651. U.S. Pat. No. 6,280,361 even provides such devices equipped with a motor to generate the resistance. It should be understood that these “resistive” devices replace or complement the elastic accessories of the above-mentioned Sandow type, but are more sophisticated since they may comprise position sensors to provide patient feedback on the action of the patient on the device. However, due to the fact that the resistance of these devices is predetermined by the intrinsic mechanical design of these devices, their rehabilitation effect on the patient and, more generally, the work they provide to the patient are not as free and as precisely-controllable as Sandow-type “passive” elastic accessories: in this case, the therapist is not certain that these devices do not distort the work of the patient, which may lead the patient to seek to adapt his movements to the device, and thus to the detriment of the achievement of rehabilitation movements that are free in all spatial directions while being directly controlled. The aim of the present invention is to provide effective means of physical rehabilitation of a patient, which, while enabling their independent implementation by the patient, are easy and safe to use.
To this end, an object of the invention is a device for controlling physical resistance forces produced by a patient, this device comprising:
The invention also relates to a patient physical rehabilitation assembly, comprising:
The control device according to the invention is simple to install and use and aims to help the therapist perform rehabilitation of the lower limbs as well as the upper limbs of the patient, through the patient's work, whether sitting or standing, against progressive resistance which is controlled and, advantageously, compared to a setpoint. For the purposes of the invention, the concept of “physical effort control” also covers the measurement and/or evaluation of these efforts. Thanks to the invention, the patient may perform work through movement, which may be of both small and large amplitude and in all spatial directions, while simultaneously the efforts produced by the patient may be applied to a freely-rotatable member of the control device: by means of this freely-rotatable member which, by definition, opposes the forces produced by the patient, no additional resistance other than that resulting from the frame, are measured, i.e., on the one hand, the traction component of the forces applied to this body by the patient via a force sensor, and, on the other hand, the angular positioning of these forces about the axis of rotation of this member via an angle sensor. The measurements of the force sensor and the angle sensor are advantageously processed to ensure that the forces developed by the patient correspond to pre-programmed intensity and positioning instructions of the therapist, in particular by real-time information feedback to the patient, typically via a control display, so that the device and the assembly according to the invention may be used by the patient autonomously and safely. By virtue of the invention, the therapist widens the therapeutic range and diversifies the exercises proposed to patients while maintaining the same spatial freedom for these exercises. The device and the assembly according to the invention may be adapted to all situations and allow all the muscle groups and all the joints of the patient to be worked.
According to additional advantageous features of the device according to the invention:
The invention will be better understood upon reading the description which follows, given solely by way of an example, and with reference to the drawings, wherein:
Among the elastic bands of the rehabilitation assembly 1, there is a pair of elastic bands 3 shown in solid lines in
Also among the elastic bands of the rehabilitation assembly 1, there is a pair of long bands 4, wherein these two long bands 4 may be described respectively as left-hand and right-hand for the same reasons as those given above for the short bands 3. It should be noted that in
In addition, in practice, more specifically during a given physical exercise, the patient is likely to put under tension either the short left band 3 or the long left band 4. This also applies to the right bands, respectively the short right band 3 and long right band 4, wherein it should be noted that the patient is, of course, likely to simultaneously tension one of the left elastic bands, namely the short band 3 or the long band 4, and one of the right elastic bands, namely the short band 3 or the long band 4. In practice, the elastic band(s) actually used in the rehabilitation assembly 1 depend(s) on the muscle groups and the joints of the patient that are to be made to work, as well as the posture of the patient during the treatment exercise, wherein it should be noted that the patient may be sitting or standing.
In addition, it should be noted that the rehabilitation assembly 1 also comprises pulleys 5 which are respectively arranged in the upper right quadrant, the lower right quadrant, the lower left quadrant and the upper left quadrant of the wall bars 2, and held there by any appropriate means, such as straps. Each of these pulleys 5 makes it possible to return one of the long elastic bands 4 during the tensioning of the latter, i.e., to bend the direction in which this long band extends: as shown schematically in
As shown in more detail in
In the exemplary embodiment considered in the figures, the frame 12 includes a tubular body 14, centered on a geometric axis X-X and with a circular base. When the device 10 is in use, the X-X axis preferably extends horizontally, wherein it should be understood that this X-X axis is fixed relative to the frame 12.
At each of its opposite axial ends, the body 14 carries a movable tubular member 16 coaxial with the axis X-X. Thus, as may be clearly seen in
The embodiment of the bearings 18 is not limiting as long as the members 16 are, independently of one another, freely rotatable about the axis X-X relative to the body 14. In practice, each bearing 18 integrates a stop system 20, known per se, which limits the rotational movement around the axis X-X of the corresponding member 16 to approximately one turn with respect to the body 14, wherein it should be remembered that over this entire stroke, the relative rotation between the member 16 and the body 14 is free, i.e. not kinematically linked.
As may be clearly seen in
The device 10 further comprises, for each member 16, a force sensor 24 which, in the embodiment considered here, is advantageously integrated inside the tubular wall of the member 16. As a non-limiting example, the force sensor 24 includes one or more strain gauges, which are interposed between the corresponding attachment 22 and the rest of the member 16. Whatever the form of the embodiment, the force sensor 24 is sensitive to mechanical stresses applied to the member 16 in a direction about the axis X-X, so that, within the device 10, each force sensor 24 makes it possible to measure, in a direction about the axis X-X, the traction component of the forces F applied by the patient to the corresponding member 16.
The device 10 further comprises, for each member 16, a sensor other than the force sensor 24, namely an angle sensor 26 which makes it possible to measure the angular positioning of the member 16 about the axis X-X. According to a non-limiting embodiment, which is implemented in the example considered in the figures, each angle sensor 26 is a magneto-resistive sensor, comprising, on the one hand, a fixed part 26A that is fixedly connected to the frame 12 via a bracket 28 to support the fixed part 26A of the angle sensor 26, and that is fixedly integrated inside the tubular body 14, and, on the other hand, a mobile part 26B that is rotatably connected to the member 16 about the axis X-X, wherein it is advantageously integrated inside the tubular wall of the member 16.
It should be understood that for each member 16, the measurements respectively provided by the force sensor 24 and by the angle sensor 26 make it possible to control the physical resistance forces F produced by the patient to put and maintain the elastic band 3 under tension or 4 without this body 16 opposing its own resistance: the measurement provided by the force sensor 24 makes it possible to determine the intensity of the forces F, more precisely the intensity of the traction component of these efforts F to which the force sensor 24 is sensitive, while the measurement provided by the angle sensor 26 makes it possible to determine the spatial orientation about the axis X-X, of the elastic band 3 or 4, more precisely the angular position of the member 16 about the axis X-X imposed by the portion of this band fixed to the attachment 22.
The signals respectively provided by the force sensor 24 and by the angle sensor 26 associated with each member 16, representative of the measurements respectively effected by these two sensors, are transmitted, typically via a wired connection to a unit 30 designed to process these signals and display the result of this processing. Thus, in the embodiment considered here and as indicated only schematically in
According to a preferred embodiment, the electronic processing means 32 are designed to monitor the measurements respectively provided by the force sensor 24 and the angle sensor 26 associated with each member 16 during the entire period of physical exercise. The electronic processing means 32 are then provided to determine the variation, as a function of time, of both the intensity of the traction component of the forces F applied to the member 16, and the angular position of this member about the X-X axis: wherein the variation of this intensity and the variation of this angular position are advantageously displayed on the screen 34, for example in the form of curves or other graphic forms, during the exercise. This feedback may also be accompanied by sound effects.
Subsequent to the above considerations, the electronic processing means 32 are advantageously designed to both memorize a setpoint, typically pre-recorded by a therapist, and to compare this setpoint with at least one characteristic of the variation of the intensity of the traction component of the forces F and/or the variation of the angular position of the corresponding member 16. The result of this comparison is either made available in real time to the patient via the display screen 34, or memorized for subsequent analysis by the therapist, wherein these two alternatives may of course be cumulated. It should be understood that this provision allows the therapist to set instructions for physical rehabilitation to the patient before the beginning of a rehabilitation exercise, so that during this exercise, the patient may be controlled in real time by himself and/or by the therapist with respect to these rehabilitation instructions.
The characteristic(s) of the variation of the intensity of the traction component of the forces F, which are compared by the electronic processing means 32 against pre-recorded instructions, is/are advantageously chosen from among:
In practice, the above-mentioned low and high values are set by the therapist, with tolerances that are themselves adjustable.
The characteristic(s) of the variation of the angular position of each member 16, which is/are compared by the electronic processing means 32 to pre-recorded instructions, is/are advantageously chosen from:
In practice, the two aforementioned values are set by the therapist and accompanied by tolerances, that are themselves adjustable.
As a purely illustrative detailed example, for a physical exercise during which the patient must stand up and use at least one of the short straps 3, the therapist adjusts the instructions stored by the device 10 so that:
Of course, based on this example and the explanations given above in this document, it should be understood that the device 10 and the rehabilitation assembly 1 make it possible to carry out very varied physical exercises, in this case gain in amplitude, evaluation of the maximum strength of a limb at the beginning and the end of rehabilitation, specific muscle strengthening, both analytic and global, both under load and released from load, in the muscle chain, up to proprioceptive work and the reproduction of sporting movements, against the resistance offered by the bands 3 and 4.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
15 56987 | Jul 2015 | FR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2016/067517 | 7/22/2016 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2017/013243 | 1/26/2017 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1416741 | Nicholls | May 1922 | A |
4253663 | Hughes | Mar 1981 | A |
4376533 | Kolbel | Mar 1983 | A |
4598908 | Morgan | Jul 1986 | A |
5234394 | Wilkinson | Aug 1993 | A |
5468205 | McFall | Nov 1995 | A |
5484368 | Chang | Jan 1996 | A |
5509873 | Corn | Apr 1996 | A |
6280361 | Harvey et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6626801 | Marques | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6662651 | Roth | Dec 2003 | B1 |
7322909 | Loccarini | Jan 2008 | B1 |
8986173 | Adams | Mar 2015 | B1 |
20020187885 | Liao | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20040152571 | Udwin | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040176226 | Carlson | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050130814 | Nitta | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060094569 | Day | May 2006 | A1 |
20070161468 | Yanagisawa | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080119763 | Wiener | May 2008 | A1 |
20080280738 | Brennan | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090017999 | Halbridge | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090227433 | Humble | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100197462 | Piane, Jr. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110152045 | Horne | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20120214651 | Ross | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130172155 | Adamchick | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20150126342 | Kaye | May 2015 | A1 |
20150297932 | Wehrell | Oct 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
4040123 | Jun 1992 | DE |
Entry |
---|
PCT Application No. PCTEP2016/067517, International Search Report, dated Oct. 14, 2016, 6 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180207486 A1 | Jul 2018 | US |