This application is a National Stage Application of International Application No. PCT/FR2014/052693 filed Oct. 22, 2014, which claims priority from French Patent Application No. 1360318 filed on Oct. 23, 2013, each of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
The present invention relates to techniques for damping vibrations to which cables used for suspending structures are subjected.
It applies in particular to bridge cable-stayed suspensions. The stays vibrate in particular because of the wind and the vehicle traffic. Various types of device have been proposed for damping these vibrations.
In a first type of damping device (see for example EP 0 343 054 A1, DE 295 17 250 U1 or WO 98/04780 A1), the vibratory energy is dissipated around the cable, in a zone delimited radially by an element fixed to the suspended structure. This element may be an arm extending between the cable and the suspended structure, or a tube receiving the bottom part of the cable. The amplitudes of the damped vibrations are limited with this type of device.
Other devices use linear-stroke dampers such as hydraulic pistons. These pistons may be disposed on arms extending between the cables and the suspending structure (see for example JP 09-59921 A) or between the cable and a tube fixed to the suspended structure and containing the bottom part of the cable (see for example FR 2 859 260 A1 or JP 06-58370 A).
A so-called pendular damping device comprises an oscillating arm connected to the cable, the oscillations of which are damped by viscous friction. FR 2 664 920 A1 describes an example of such a pendular device.
In an embodiment of the pendular damping device as depicted in
The pendular device provides strong damping on the cables, in particular long cables. It is typically situated at the bottom part of the cable, at approximately 2%-3% of its total length from the bottom anchorage. The design of this device makes it possible to damp both the vertical and transverse movements of the cable, over long strokes, around typically ±100 mm to approximately ±150 mm.
However, the deviations of the cables are sometimes even greater, in particular when the structure is flexible. The necessary strokes are even greater, and may for example range up to ±700 mm.
The concept of the pendular device then therefore has its limits since the pistons have very long strokes, the device becomes excessively bulky, as shown by
An object of the present invention is to improve the pendular device and to facilitate insertion thereof in the structure, in particular if the amplitudes of the vibrations to be damped are large.
A device for damping vibrations of a cable, in particular a bridge stay, is proposed, which device comprises:
The guide forms a kind of slide that effects a decoupling between the movements of the cable perpendicular to the arm, which are damped by the first damper, and the movements parallel to the arm, which are damped by the second damper. The second damper may have a relatively long stroke without affecting too severely the overall size of the device and its aesthetic appearance. The guide prevents it from being subjected to bending moments detrimental to its functioning.
In an embodiment of the device, the first damper comprises at least one piston disposed transversely to the arm and connected to the arm below the pivot. The piston may be placed under an upper face of the structure suspended by means of the cable, in particular in the case where the pivot is positioned relative to the arm so that a distance between the pivot and a point of attachment of the coupler on the cable is greater than the lever arm, relative to the pivot, of the force exerted by the piston on the arm. The difference in lever arm, relative to the pivot, between the transverse forces applied by the vibrating cable and the resistance opposed by the piston of the first damper enables this piston to have a reduced stroke. It may therefore be of limited size and be housed in a cavity provided in the suspended structure. Advantageously, the leverage is increased by providing for the distance between the pivot and the point of attachment of the coupler to be at least three times larger than the lever arm, relative to the pivot, of the force exerted by the piston on the arm.
The pivot, when it is placed within the thickness of the structure suspended by means of the cable, may be made invisible to persons travelling on this structure. It advantageously provides a ball joint or gimbal type of articulation, which enables the device to accept movements of the coupler parallel to the axis of the cable, due for example to its thermal expansion. Provision can be made for the pivot to be substantially fixed with respect to a structure suspended by means of the cable.
Another aspect of the present invention relates to a cable-stayed bridge, comprising at least one tower, a deck, stays consisting of cables extending obliquely between the tower and the deck in order to suspend the deck, and, mounted between at least one cable on the deck, a damping device as defined above.
Other features and advantages of the present invention will emerge from the following description of a non-limitative example embodiment, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
The invention is described below in a non-limitative application to cable-stayed bridges. The cables the vibrations of which are to be damped are then stays 16 that extend between a tower 20 of the bridge and its deck 14 in order to suspend the deck 14.
One or more of the stays 16 are equipped with a damping device 22 comprising an arm that extends transversely to the stay 16 between an attachment point P situated in the vicinity of its lower anchorage (for example at a few % of the total length of the stay) and the deck 14. In general, the arm of the damping device 22 is situated substantially in the same vertical plane as the stay 16 to which it is connected. However, it is possible for the arm to slightly deviate from this plane.
In the example depicted in
Between the arm 25 and the coupler 27 mounted on the stay 16 at an attachment point P, a slider guide 28 is installed in order to ensure that coupler 27 remains in line with the arm 25. A second linear-stroke damper 31, such as a hydraulic piston, is mounted between the coupler 27 and the arm 25. This damper 31 damps the movement of the attachment point P of the cable 16 parallel to the arm 25.
In the configuration depicted in
The guide 28 prevents communication to the piston 31 of undesirable bending forces resulting from movements of the stay 16 perpendicular to the arm 25. It affords decoupling between the damping of the movements parallel to the arm, provided by the damper 31, and damping of the movements perpendicular to the arm, provided by the damper 30. The two dampers 30, 31 may then be designed and optimised independently in order to obtain the damping effects sought.
The attachment point P of the damping device 22 is situated beyond the guide tube 37. At this point P, a collar 40 is clamped around the bundle of strands constituting the stay 16 in order to fix it to the coupler 27.
In the exemplary embodiment of
The arm 25 of the damping device emerges from the guide 28 at its lower end. The guide 28 has, relative to the arm 25, a telescopic movement damped by the piston 31, and does not communicate bending moments to the piston 31. Shoes or sliding bearings 45 are disposed between the arm 25 and the internal face of the guide 28 in order guide the telescopic movement and minimise the coefficient of friction between these two parts, so as not to interfere with the functioning of the damping device 22. These shoes or bearings 45, fixed either to the arm 25 or inside the guide 28, are for example produced from polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) or ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE).
It should be noted that the second damper 31 and the slider guide 28 may have very diverse arrangements.
For example, rather than having a hydraulic piston 31 in the central position surrounded by the guide 28 as in
In the case of
Such an embodiment is illustrated schematically in
In the example illustrated by
The embodiment illustrated by
The pivot 26 is positioned along the arm 25 in order to obtain a lever effect for the action of the first damper 30, which enables the latter to have a compact configuration. For this purpose, the distance D between the pivot and the point of attachment P of the coupler 27 is greater than the lever arm of the piston 30, which is equal to the distance D between the pivot and the point Q of connection of the piston 30 to the arm 25 in the particular configuration shown schematically in
The fact that the pivot 26 is of the ball-joint type enables the device 22 to accept movements of the attachment point P of the stay in a direction perpendicular to the arm 25 in the plane containing the stay 16 and the arm 25. These movements may be due either to vibrations of the stay if the arm 25 is not strictly perpendicular, or to its elongation due to thermal expansion.
In an alternative embodiment the pivot 26 is implemented by means of an gimbal-type of articulation between the deck 14 and the arm 15, i.e. with two mutually perpendicular articulation axes. Such a variant is illustrated very schematically in
Another possible arrangement of the first damper 30 is depicted schematically in
The embodiments described and mentioned above are illustrations of the present invention. Various modifications may be made thereto without departing from the scope of the invention that emerges from the accompanying claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
13 60318 | Oct 2013 | FR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/FR2014/052693 | 10/22/2014 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2015/059413 | 4/30/2015 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4280600 | Salmon | Jul 1981 | A |
4648147 | Zimmermann et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
5173982 | Lovett | Dec 1992 | A |
6334608 | Stubler | Jan 2002 | B1 |
20070061982 | Lecinq | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20110277252 | Stubler | Nov 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
29517250 | Dec 1995 | DE |
0343054 | Nov 1989 | EP |
2 664 920 | Jan 1992 | FR |
2 854 217 | Oct 2004 | FR |
2859260 | Mar 2005 | FR |
05039606 | Feb 1993 | JP |
6-58369 | Mar 1994 | JP |
6-58370 | Mar 1994 | JP |
9-59921 | Mar 1997 | JP |
11-172618 | Jun 1999 | JP |
2000136508 | May 2000 | JP |
9804780 | Feb 1998 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160273174 A1 | Sep 2016 | US |