Patent Grant
8525032
The present invention relates generally to high voltage apparatuses, and more particularly to reducing the risk of dielectric breakdowns in high voltage apparatuses.
Within high voltage applications it is known in the art to provide corona shields of an electrically conductive material, usually metal, in geometric and electric connection to a high voltage conductor or other high voltage equipment. By distributing the electrical charge over the increased surface area of the shield, the maximum electrical field strength is reduced, thereby reducing the risk of corona discharge.
One disadvantage with such an arrangement is that due to the large curvature and geometrical extension, a zone with relatively high and homogenous electrical field is created. This enables propagation of discharges that can be triggered by small temporary disturbances, such as insects, large dust particles, etc. When high voltages are applied, particularly DC, it has been observed that this mechanism can causes breakdown at voltages which are significantly lower than is expected from conventional design rules.
International application with the publication number WO 2007/149015 discloses providing a resistor between the shield and a valve group in a high voltage direct current application.
While this resistor reduces the risk of such breakdown, it adds to the complexity of a corona shield.
An object of the present invention is to provide a simpler and more stable way of reducing the risk for breakdown from corona shields.
According to a first aspect of the invention, it is presented a device comprising: a corona shield; and at least one support element for connecting the corona shield to a high voltage apparatus. The at least one support element comprises a semiconducting polymer, which, when said device is in operation, acts as a resistance between the corona shield and the high voltage apparatus. Furthermore the support element is arranged to fix the corona shield to the high voltage apparatus.
By using the support element with the resistance to fix the corona shield, a less complex and more stable structure is obtained. It provides a greatly improved freedom in design of the support elements. Furthermore, since the structures of the polymer based resistor can be made long, the drop in voltage over length is reduced compared to if a conventional resistor is used. This reduces the risk for surface discharges. For a conventional resistor there is a risk that an electrical discharge can start from one of its end fittings due to the local high electric field strength. Bridging over the resistor, the discharge short circuits it, supplying essentially full voltage to the corona shield. The end fittings of the conventional resistor could be equipped with field reducing shields, but this increases complexity in the rather limited space available.
The at least one support element may have a resistance in the range of 100 kiloohm to 100 megaohm.
The semiconducting polymer may comprises a non-conducting polymer with a conducting filler. The non-conducting polymer may be selected from the group consisting of: polyethylene, cross linked polyethylene, polypropylene, polyvinylchloride, polystyrene, polyurethane, epoxy resins, phenol based resins, polymer blends and copolymers, or any combination of these. The semiconducting polymer can in principle be an intrinsic semiconducting polymer as polypyrrole. More practical and economical are conventional polymers with a conducting filler, usually carbon black.
At least one of the at least one support element may have a cross shaped cross section. The tubular cross section provides a support element with increased strength in relation to material use, and thereby weight. Other cross sectional shapes can be selected, such as any shape in the group consisting of: a tubular shape, a square shape, a rectangular shape, an I shape or a circular shape.
At least one of the at least one support element may comprise a core of the semiconducting polymer and an outer layer made of an outer material which is more durable when exposed to air than the semiconducting polymer. By providing a more durable outer layer, the life span of the semiconducting polymer is increased, increasing mean time between maintenance and/or failure. The strength and conductivity can be tuned by selecting different thicknesses of the materials and different material combinations.
The outer material can be made of the same polymer as the conductive polymer, but without filler, other polymers or of a varnish/paint, e.g. alkyd varnish.
The support element may further comprise: a first conducting element connected to the corona shield on one end and the semiconducting polymer on a second end.
The support element may further comprise: a second conducting element connected to the semiconducting polymer on a first end and the second conducting element is arranged to be connected to the high voltage apparatus on a second end.
The semiconducting polymer may be attached to the corona shield and the semiconducting polymer may be arranged to be attached to the high voltage apparatus.
The corona shield may be substantially toroidal with at least an outer layer comprising a metal.
A second aspect of the invention is a high voltage wall bushing comprising the device according to the first aspect.
A third aspect of the invention is a method for manufacturing a device. The method comprises the steps of: providing at least one support element comprising a semiconducting polymer, which, when the device is in operation, acts as a resistance between a corona shield and a high voltage apparatus; and mounting the at least one support element between a corona shield and a high voltage apparatus.
The step of providing may further comprise: providing a dielectric core for each of the at least one support element; and applying the semiconducting polymer by spray painting a layer of the semiconducting polymer on each of the at least one support elements. By spray painting it is possible to get a thin layer of semiconducting polymer, with dimensions that alleviate achieving a large resistance.
The step of providing at least one support element may further comprise: providing a dielectric layer on an exterior side of the layer of the semiconducting polymer.
It is to be noted that any feature of the first, second and third aspects may, where appropriate, be applied to any other aspect.
Generally, all terms used in the claims are to be interpreted according to their ordinary meaning in the technical field, unless explicitly defined otherwise herein. All references to “a/an/the element, apparatus, component, means, step, etc.” are to be interpreted openly as referring to at least one instance of the element, apparatus, component, means, step, etc., unless explicitly stated otherwise. The steps of any method disclosed herein do not have to be performed in the exact order disclosed, unless explicitly stated.
The invention is now described, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
a-c are schematic drawings of how the supporting member can be embodied,
a-k are schematic diagrams showing cross sections of a section of the support element where the polymer based resistor is present, and
a-b are schematic diagrams of two embodiments illustrating how the corona shield can be fixed to the conductor.
The present invention will now be described more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which certain embodiments of the invention are shown. This invention may, however, be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein; rather, these embodiments are provided by way of example so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete, and will fully convey the scope of the invention to those skilled in the art. Like numbers refer to like elements throughout the description.
An insulator 3 is provided around the conductor 2 all the way through a wall 1. At one end of the insulator 3, a corona shield 4 is provided. The corona shield is typically substantially toroidal with at least an outer layer comprising a metal. Alternatively, the corona shield can be substantially spherical.
The corona shield 4 is connected to the conductor 2 via a support element 6. The support element 6 comprises a semiconducting polymer. Being semiconducting, the polymer is conductive, but provided with a significant resistance. The total resistance between the conductor 2 and the corona shield 4 is preferably between about 100 kiloohm and about 100 megaohm. The exact value will depend on the geometry and the capacitance, and may need verified for each individual case. If the resistance is too low, the voltage drop during a beginning dielectric breakdown is too low. If the resistance is too high, it is difficult to keep the corona shield 4 at the same potential as the conductor 2. The polymer can be any suitable semiconducting polymer providing a total resistance within the indicated operating range. The semiconducting polymer may comprise a non-conducting polymer with a conducting filler, wherein the non-conducting polymer may be a conventional polymer selected from the group consisting of: polyethylene (PE), cross linked polyethylene (PEX), polypropylene (PP), polyvinylchloride (PVC), polystyrene (PS), polyurethane (PUR), epoxy resins, phenol based resins (bakelite), also including polymer blends and copolymers, or any combination of these. The semiconducting polymer can in principle be an intrinsic semiconducting polymer as polypyrrole. More practical and economical are conventional polymers with a conducting filler as described above, where the conducting filler is usually carbon black.
It is to be noted that the resistance may vary significantly within a determined operating range, allowing the use of polymer based resistors. For instance, even though the resistance of many polymer materials of today vary with temperature, these materials are still functional as resistances for this use. Also, if several support elements 6 are utilized, the equivalent total resistance should remain within the ranges indicated above.
Because of the resistance of the support element 6, the corona shield has better protection for dielectric breakdowns. This results in a significantly reduced risk of breakdown due to anomalies.
This mechanism works as follows. When in normal operation, there is no discharge from the corona shield 4. There is no current flowing out of the corona shield 4 and no current flows through the support element 6. Since there is no current, there is no significant voltage drop over the support element 6, whereby the corona shield 4 is provided with the same voltage as the conductor 2. When a discharge 7 is triggered, e.g. by an anomaly, a current flows from the corona shield into the discharge which grows towards the remote object, e.g. the wall 1. The current draws power from the conductor 2, whereby a current flows through the support element 6. Due to the high resistance of the support element 6, there is a resulting voltage drop from the conductor 2 to the corona shield 4. At least in some cases, this voltage drop is sufficient for the discharge 7 to stop, due to an insufficient voltage difference between the corona shield and the remote object, e.g. the wall 1.
It is to be noted that the support element 6 is a sufficiently rigid structure to be able to fix the corona shield to the conductor 2.
a-c are schematic drawings of how the support element 6 can be embodied. In
In
In the embodiment shown in
It is to be noted that the polymer based resistor 10 of any of the embodiments illustrated in
a-k are schematic diagrams showing cross sections of a section of the support element 6 where the polymer based resistor 10 is present, in various embodiments. It is to be noted that the support element can for example be the support element 6 shown in any of the
a illustrates the support element 6 where the cross section of the polymer based resistor 10 is substantially circular.
c illustrates the support element 6 where the cross section of the polymer based resistor 10 is tubular.
e illustrates the support element 6 where the cross section of the polymer based resistor 10 is substantially rectangular or square shaped.
g illustrates the support element 6 where the cross section of the polymer based resistor 10 is I-shaped.
i illustrates a support element 6 where the cross section is I-shaped, but the centre section 9 is made of a dielectric material, e.g. the material of the outer layer as described previously. In the inner sections the polymer based resistor 10 is provided as a thin layer. The thin layer can be attached as a thin solid piece. Alternatively, the thin layer can be spray painted on the centre section. In this embodiment, the thickness of the polymer based resistor is preferably between 0.1 mm and 2 mm. If the thickness is less than 0.1 mm, there is a risk of mechanical breaking of the polymer based resistor, which would also break the electrical connection. If the thickness is more than 2 mm, it may be easier to provide the polymer based resistor in other ways than spray painting. It is to be noted that the method of spray painting is applicable to any suitable cross sectional shape, not only the I-shape as described here.
j illustrates the support element 6 where the cross section of the polymer based resistor 10 is cross shaped.
a-b are schematic diagrams of two embodiments illustrating how the corona shield 4 can be fixed to the conductor 2.
In
In
While the invention is illustrated above as implemented in a wall bushing, any high voltage apparatus where a corona shield is beneficial would also benefit from the present invention. For example, the present invention can be embodied in a high voltage power transformer bushing, a high voltage measuring transformer, a high voltage switchgear, a high voltage line insulator, a high voltage surge arrester or in conjunction with HVDC (High Voltage Direct Current) valves.
The invention has mainly been described above with reference to a few embodiments. However, as is readily appreciated by a person skilled in the art, other embodiments than the ones disclosed above are equally possible within the scope of the invention, as defined by the appended patent claims.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08157922 | Jun 2008 | EP | regional |
The present application is a continuation of pending International patent application PCT/EP2009/056910 filed on Jun. 5, 2009, which designates the United States and claims priority from European patent application EP 08157922.9 filed on Jun. 10, 2008, the content of which is incorporated herein by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2789154 | Peterson | Apr 1957 | A |
| 2953628 | Winter et al. | Sep 1960 | A |
| 3643004 | McKean | Feb 1972 | A |
| 3828116 | Lonow | Aug 1974 | A |
| 3930113 | Johansen et al. | Dec 1975 | A |
| 4025715 | Foley et al. | May 1977 | A |
| 4355200 | Wheeler et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
| 4505033 | Wheeler | Mar 1985 | A |
| 4584429 | Raketti et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
| 4584431 | Tippie et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
| 5877453 | Hill | Mar 1999 | A |
| 6130495 | Schulten et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6388197 | Zhao et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6525265 | Leijon et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 20070091970 | Daharsh et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 426653 | Feb 1938 | BE |
| 582145 | Dec 1924 | FR |
| 2117983 | Oct 1983 | GB |
| 2007149015 | Dec 2007 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability; PCT/EP2009/056910; Jun. 14, 2010; 9 Pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority; PCT/EP2009/056910; Aug. 17, 2009; 8 Pages. |
| European Search Report; Application No. EP 08 15 7922; Oct. 24, 2008; 5 pages. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20110114359 A1 | May 2011 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | PCT/EP2009/056910 | Jun 2009 | US |
| Child | 12956942 | US |
