The invention concerns a device for defense and protection from projectiles, particularly shaped charge projectiles according to the generic term of claim 1.
It is known that a kind of protective grille or several grille-like protective barriers of steel treads and steel slats and/or similar welded steel elements can be installed on military vehicles, for example, for defense from shaped charge projectiles. The purpose is to disturb the projectile and thereby put it out of order or at least to prevent its full effect. Such devices are relatively massive, mounting them is not easy (many connection parts are necessary) and they often impair visibility and reduce the payload of these vehicles by their relatively heavy weight.
The netting of this invention, in particular, offers protection against shell projectiles with shaped charges or similar warheads.
Further possibilities for using this special protective netting are in the area of protecting containers, property, perimeters, maritime facilities, ships, platforms, strengthening glass facades, etc.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a device for defense and protection from projectiles, in particular shaped charge projectiles, that is advantageous in terms of its weight, provides better visibility for the occupants when installed on a vehicle and greater security for the object to be protected.
This problem is solved in terms of an invention by a device with the features of claim 1.
Further preferred arrangements of the device of the invention are the subject of the dependent claims.
The device according to the invention for defense from projectiles, particularly shaped charge projectiles, of which a protective barrier or barriers consists or consist preferably of a rhomboid mesh-forming netting, is in comparison with conventional protective grilles essentially lighter and its installation (mounting and dismounting) is considerably simpler. Considerably fewer connecting parts are used especially when wires, cables or bars running through edge meshes and/or loop-like end elements are used. The device is easily transportable by an airplane, for example, as the wire netting can be folded or rolled up. Likewise these specific nettings, thanks to their material make-up, can be harnessed without causing deformation which simplifies installation and optimizes function.
At the same time this device offers high security in the sense that such projectiles are disturbed by this netting and thereby become virtual duds. They lose their effect because the jet of molten metal normally produced upon impact does not occur or is largely disrupted.
Additionally—when for example a military vehicle is protected by the device according to the invention—visibility is essentially better for the driver or the occupants of the vehicle than with conventional protective grilles.
The invention will be described below in reference to the drawings:
In
A particularly preferred implementation of the wire netting 3 is illustrated in
Wires 5 to 8 are provided with loops or knots 5a, 6a, 7a, 8a on their ends and are linked with each other in pairs by them.
By the link connections of the neighboring wire pairs in the linkage area A as well as in the end areas the wire netting 3 can be folded or rolled up for storage without problems.
It is also possible to form this wire netting with a middle wire between the contact points of the individual coils. A netting with an arrangement formed by two or more steel wires or wire strands is also suitable (see EP-A-1 628 790).
On the top and bottom ends of the wire netting 3 a wire, cable, bar 10 or another frame element can be looped on the edge wire 5 bent in a coil by which the wire netting 3 can be extended longitudinally and they can be fastened to the military vehicle 1. For fastening to the military vehicle 1 corresponding fasteners could certainly hold the edge wire loops 5′ directly. The wire netting 3 can be fastened with similar elements running through the loops or knots 5a, 6a, 7a, 8a as well (wires, cables, bars or directly meshing fasteners).
The individual protective barriers of the device 2 can also be bordered by wire netting sections with a frame formed of bars, for example, and the device can be put together from these. Fasteners can also be formed by cables, wires or strands. Moreover, depending on use, a slightly round, conic, concave and/or convex stretching on a surface is advantageous.
The size of the rhomboid meshes 4, particularly their inner diameter (
The device according to the invention for defense from shell projectiles is essentially lighter in comparison to conventional protective grilles and its installation (mounting and dismounting) is considerably easier as fewer connecting places are used especially if the above mentioned wires, cables or bar running through the edge meshes and/or loop-like end elements are used for fastening.
The device is easily transportable by airplane, for example, since the wire netting can be folded or rolled up. Moreover, visibility for the vehicle driver or occupants is essentially better than with conventional protective grilles. The wire netting can be arranged closer to the object because of the harness in the netting as well as the optimal stretching and contortion of the special netting so that the total width of a military vehicle, for example, can be reduced which facilitates its use in cities, as an example.
Naturally, the device according to the invention for defense from shell projectiles can be applied to the protection of many other objects besides military vehicles or movable objects. Strategically important objects, such as monitored entrances, can be equipped with the device according to the invention (in that case, a single protective barrier would probably suffice) or other objects can be only temporarily protected.
It is especially advantageous to produce the wire netting from wires that consist of reinforced steel with a nominal strength between 1,000 and 3,000 N/mm2, or between 900 and 3,000 N/mm2, and it can be spring steel wires of the DIN-norm 17223. This allows one to use essentially thinner wires with equal strength by which the likelihood that a shell projectile will come in frontally with the detonation element directly on a wire and thus bringing about a full explosion is decreased. Moreover, the total weight of the device according to the invention is further reduced and visibility for the vehicle driver or occupants, for example, is further ameliorated.
The mesh size of a netting 3 can be carefully chosen such that the netting performs the function of a protective shield. Upon impact of a shell projectile a detonation always or at least most of the time ensues. But because of a sufficient distance of the netting to the object 1 damage to the object can be prevented or very much reduced. The mesh size or the inner diameter of the netting is preferably less than 30 mm in such a case.
Instead of individual, preferably coil-shaped bent wires wire elements such as wire strands, wire cables, wire bundles or the like may also be used for the wire netting 3.
The netting 3 can basically consist of rectangular, triangular, polygonal and/or rhomboid meshes 4. It can also have a honeycomb form or hexagonal formation as in hedge fencing. It is further possible that such netting structures can be formed or otherwise produced from plastics and or partly from plastics and/or partly from combined materials which then could give the already mentioned mesh formations.
Basically such a netting can be understood as one which is formed as a grid as is explained, for example, in EP-A-0 679 457.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
07405007 | Jan 2007 | EP | regional |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1286261 | Elia | Dec 1918 | A |
1385897 | Tresidder | Jul 1921 | A |
1657915 | Calamita | Jan 1928 | A |
2323853 | Simeone | Jul 1943 | A |
2954964 | O'Haffey | Oct 1960 | A |
3586236 | Schaffler | Jun 1971 | A |
3769142 | Holmes et al. | Oct 1973 | A |
3942598 | Council | Mar 1976 | A |
3964197 | Tucker et al. | Jun 1976 | A |
4787289 | Duer | Nov 1988 | A |
5524694 | Arapis | Jun 1996 | A |
6363867 | Tsilevich | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6481782 | Bond | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6568310 | Morgan | May 2003 | B2 |
6647855 | Christiansen et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6973864 | Ahmad | Dec 2005 | B1 |
7073538 | Bhatnagar et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7076898 | Hunt | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7100490 | Muller, Jr. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
20040221712 | Stewart et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050262998 | Ahmad | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060065111 | Henry | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060144640 | Wartmann | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070099526 | Heerden et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070131917 | Wartmann | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070180983 | Farinella et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070210214 | Wartmann | Sep 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
218246 | Jan 1910 | DE |
691067 | May 1940 | DE |
517911 | Feb 1940 | GB |
WO 9200496 | Jan 1992 | WO |
2006135432 | Dec 2006 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080164379 A1 | Jul 2008 | US |