Fragrance delivery devices are used to emit fragrances into the ambient environment. The use of fragrances can enhance a user's experience within a particular space. For example, fragrances may increase a potential buyer's desire to make a food or retail purchase. In another example, less desirable fragrances may discourage entry or lingering within a particular space.
Embodiments of a delivery apparatus include a volatile agent source, a controller, and an emanator material. The volatile agent source stores a volume of a volatile agent such as a fragrance. The volatile agent source includes an outlet for delivery of the volatile agent from the volatile agent source. The controller controls a delivery rate of the volatile agent from the volatile agent source. The emanator material is disposed at approximately the outlet of the volatile agent source. The emanator material absorbs at least a portion of the volatile agent and maintains the volatile agent until the volatile agent evaporates into an ambient environment. Other embodiments of the apparatus are also described.
Other aspects and advantages of embodiments of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, illustrated by way of example of the principles of the invention.
Throughout the description, similar reference numbers may be used to identify similar elements.
It will be readily understood that the components of the embodiments as generally described herein and illustrated in the appended figures could be arranged and designed in a wide variety of different configurations. Thus, the following more detailed description of various embodiments, as represented in the figures, is not intended to limit the scope of the present disclosure, but is merely representative of various embodiments. While the various aspects of the embodiments are presented in drawings, the drawings are not necessarily drawn to scale unless specifically indicated.
The present invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from its spirit or essential characteristics. The described embodiments are to be considered in all respects only as illustrative and not restrictive. The scope of the invention is, therefore, indicated by the appended claims rather than by this detailed description. All changes which come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are to be embraced within their scope.
Reference throughout this specification to features, advantages, or similar language does not imply that all of the features and advantages that may be realized with the present invention should be or are in any single embodiment of the invention. Rather, language referring to the features and advantages is understood to mean that a specific feature, advantage, or characteristic described in connection with an embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the present invention. Thus, discussions of the features and advantages, and similar language, throughout this specification may, but do not necessarily, refer to the same embodiment.
Furthermore, the described features, advantages, and characteristics of the invention may be combined in any suitable manner in one or more embodiments. One skilled in the relevant art will recognize, in light of the description herein, that the invention can be practiced without one or more of the specific features or advantages of a particular embodiment. In other instances, additional features and advantages may be recognized in certain embodiments that may not be present in all embodiments of the invention.
Reference throughout this specification to “one embodiment,” “an embodiment,” or similar language means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the indicated embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the present invention. Thus, the phrases “in one embodiment,” “in an embodiment,” and similar language throughout this specification may, but do not necessarily, all refer to the same embodiment.
Embodiments of the present invention have been developed in response to the present state of the art and, in particular, in response to the problems and needs in the art that have not yet been fully solved by currently available structures and methods. Accordingly, embodiments of the invention have been developed to provide structures and methods to overcome various shortcomings of the prior art. The features and advantages of various embodiments of the invention will become more fully apparent from the following description and appended claims, or may be learned by practice of the invention as set forth hereinafter.
While many embodiments are described herein, at least some embodiments relate to a delivery apparatus to deliver a fragrance or other volatile agent to an ambient environment. In one embodiment, the delivery apparatus includes a volatile agent source, a controller, and an emanator material. The volatile agent source stores a volume of a volatile agent such as a fragrance. The volatile agent source includes an outlet for delivery of the volatile agent from the volatile agent source. The controller controls a delivery rate of the volatile agent from the volatile agent source. The emanator material is disposed at approximately the outlet of the volatile agent source. The emanator material absorbs at least a portion of the volatile agent and maintains the volatile agent until the volatile agent evaporates into an ambient environment. Other embodiments of the delivery apparatus are also described.
In general, the controller 102 of the delivery apparatus 100 controls delivery of the volatile agent 120 from the volatile agent source 104 into an ambient environment. There are various ways in which the controller 102 can control this process. In one embodiment, the controller 102 controls generation of the volatile agent 120 within the volatile agent source 104. In another embodiment, the controller 102 controls generation of another gas or fluid which forces the volatile agent 120 out of the volatile agent source 104. The volatile agent 120 can be allowed to evaporate, transpire, or convect naturally into the ambient environment. Alternatively, the transfer of the volatile agent 120 to the ambient environment can be facilitated by artificial airflow or other forces.
In some embodiments, the controller 102 controls a delivery rate of the volatile agent 120 over a target delivery period. The delivery rate may be consistent or variable. Similarly, the delivery period may be consistent or intermittent. For example, the controller 102 may implement a delivery period that includes intermittent durations of delivery separated by durations of non-delivery. In another example, the controller 102 may implement a delivery period that maintains a consistent delivery rate for given settings over the delivery entire period. In other embodiments, the controller 102 may implement variable delivery rates and periods based on one or more ambient feedback inputs such as temperature, barometric pressure, and so forth. For example, if the ambient temperature went up the controller 102 would decrease the current so that the gas volumetric flow rate of the device would stay the same. Conversely, if the ambient temperature went down the controller 102 would increase the current so that the gas volumetric flow rate of the device would stay the same. Similarly, if an increase in pressure was detected, the controller 102 would increase the current to maintain volumetric flow. Conversely, if a pressure drop was detected, the controller 102 would decrease the current to maintain a constant volumetric flow.
In one embodiment, the controller 102 implements the timer 112 to track periods of delivery and/or non-delivery. In some embodiments, the controller 102 uses the timer 112 to set a specific delivery period. For example, the delivery period may be about 60 days or, in some embodiments, up to about 90 days or more.
In some embodiments, the controller 102 includes the user interface 114 so that a user can input one or more instructions and/or receive one or more feedback signals. The instructions may include, but are not limited to, an instruction to start delivery, an instruction to stop temporarily or permanently delivery, an instruction to increase or decrease a delivery rate, in instruction to implement or change a mix ratio between multiple volatile agents, and so forth. The feedback signals may include audible feedback (e.g., tones or verbal recordings), visual feedback (e.g., indicator lights, readout displays), or other types of feedback that are recognizable by a user.
The controller 102 implements the volatile agent source switch 116 to control delivery of the volatile agent 120 from the volatile agent source 104. The volatile agent source switch 116 may be any type of switch to control absolute or variable delivery rates of the volatile agent 120 from the volatile agent source 104. In some embodiment, the controller 102 controls the volatile agent source switch 116 according to a time indicated by the timer 112.
The controller 102 implements the airflow source switch 118 to control operation of the airflow source 108. In general, the airflow source 108 provides airflow to help deliver the volatile agent 120 from the delivery apparatus 100. The airflow source switch 118 may be any type of switch to control absolute or variable airflow rates of the airflow source 108. Accordingly, the airflow source switch 118 may be adjusted such that the airflow starts and stops at different intervals. Similarly, the airflow source switch 118 may be adjusted such that the airflow intensity can be adjusted. In some embodiment, the controller 102 controls the airflow source switch 118 according to a time indicated by the timer 112.
Additionally, the controller 102 may control the airflow source switch 118 and the volatile agent source switch 116 separately or together. When these switches 116 and 118 are controlled together, the volatile agent source 104 and the airflow source 108 may be controlled synchronously or in an otherwise combined relative manner. For example, the controller 102 may control the volatile agent source switch 116 to turn on the volatile agent source 104 at the same time that the controller 102 controls the airflow source switch 118 to turn on the airflow source 108. Similarly, the controller 102 may control the volatile agent source switch 116 to increase a delivery rate of the volatile agent source 104 at the same time that the controller 102 controls the airflow source switch 118 to increase an airflow intensity of the airflow source 108. In another example, the controller may receive a user input via the user interface 114 to decrease the airflow intensity the delivery apparatus 100, in which case the controller 102 can control the airflow source switch 118 to decrease an airflow intensity of the airflow source 108 at the same time that the controller 102 controls the volatile agent source switch 116 to decrease a delivery rate of the volatile agent 120 from the volatile agent source 104.
The volatile agent source 104 may be any kind of device which generates, stores, and or facilitates delivery of the volatile agent 120 into the ambient environment. The volatile agent 120 may be a fluid or a gas. In some embodiments, the volatile agent 120 is a liquid fragrance. Alternatively, the volatile agent 120 may be another type of substance.
In one embodiment, the amount of volatile agent 120 that is generated, stored, and/or delivered by the volatile agent source 104 is up to about 200 cc by volume. In another embodiment, the amount of volatile agent 120 that is generated, stored, and/or delivered by the volatile agent source 104 is up to about 300 cc by volume. Other embodiments may generate, store, and/or deliver other amounts of the volatile agent 120.
In some embodiments, the volatile agent source 104 includes the gas generator 122 to generate a gas or other volume of substance within the volatile agent source 104. The generation of the gas or other substance may be used to displace the volatile agent 120 and, consequently, deliver the volatile agent 120 from the volatile agent source 104.
As the volatile agent 120 is expelled or delivered from the volatile agent source 104, at least some of the volatile agent 120 is absorbed by the emanator 106. For reference, the emanator 106 is also referred to herein as an emanator material. In one embodiment, the emanator 106 is a storage and delivery vehicle for the volatile agent 120.
The emanator 106 has one or more properties which determine or influence the delivery rate/time of the volatile agent 120 from the delivery apparatus 120. Some examples of such properties include, but are not limited to an evaporation rate, a wicking property, a retention property, and a clogging property. By noting these and other properties of the emanator 106, a proper combination of the emanator 106 and the volatile agent 120 can be selected to determine or influence the performance parameters of the delivery agent 100, as a whole. In other words, the volatile agent 120 can be chosen by taking into consideration some or all of the parameters of the emanator 106. In one embodiment, the delivery apparatus 100 has a design parameter for a specific emanation rate of the volatile agent 120 (e.g., in g/sqcm/hour units). In one embodiment, the maximum pumping rate achievable based on the environmental factors and combinations of controller settings is determined such that the exposed or total area of the emanator 106 exceeds the minimum amount required to emanate the maximum delivery possible for the volatile agent 120.
The airflow source 108 also may determine or influence the delivery rate of the volatile agent 120 from the delivery apparatus 100. In general, the airflow source 108 generates an artificial airflow that is directed at, near, or through the emanator 106. As the generated airflow passed by the emanator 106, the airflow causes forced convection of the volatile agent 120 from the emanator 106 and into the ambient environment.
In one embodiment, the power source 110 provides all of the necessary power for all of the components within the delivery apparatus 100. The power source may include any type of power generator or transfer device. In one embodiment, the power source is a battery which stores electrical energy and emits direct current (DC) at a predetermined voltage. Alternatively, the power source 110 may include a conductor for connection to an external power source such as an external battery (not shown) or an external alternating current (AC) source (not shown). In some embodiments, the controller 102 controls some or all of the power transferred to any of the components within the delivery apparatus 100.
The use of a cartridge 130 format may be useful, in some embodiments, to facilitate easy replacement of consumable components of the delivery apparatus 100. Also, embodiments of the delivery apparatus 100 may be stand-alone units or may be configured to retrofit into preexisting housings.
In particular, the volatile agent source 104 and the emanator 106 are within an interior space of a housing 132 of the cartridge 130. The depicted housing 132 is cylindrical with a circular cross-section. The housing 132 defines an interior channel with an inlet 134 and an outlet 136. For reference, the inlet 134 is also referred to herein as an input, an input side, or an inlet side of the housing 132. Similarly, the outlet 136 is also referred to herein as an output, an output side, or an outlet side of the housing 132. In some embodiments, the outlet 136 of the housing 132 is also designated as the outlet of the delivery apparatus 100, as a whole. The inlet 134 and the outlet 136 are located on opposite ends of to the cylindrical housing 132. In an embodiment which relies on natural convection of the volatile agent 120 from the delivery apparatus 100, either end of the housing 132 may be designated as the inlet 134 or outlet 136.
In the illustrated embodiment, the volatile agent source 104 and the emanatory 106 are located within the interior space of the cartridge 132. Under control of the controller 102 (refer to
The emanator 106 includes one or more sheets of materials that have sufficient wicking properties to absorb the volatile agent 120. Some examples of potential emanator materials include, but are not necessarily limited to cellulose fiber, non-woven fibers, woven fibers, naturally occurring fibers, sponge, gauze, and foam. In other embodiments, the emanator 106 may be made from another material or a combination of materials. In some embodiments, the emanator 106 includes material that has a liquid wicking action which is greater than or equal to the force of gravity. This allows the delivery apparatus 106 to be oriented in any direction.
In
In the illustrated embodiment, the airflow source 108 is located at or adjacent to the inlet 134 of the housing 132. The airflow source 108 provides a source or airflow into the inlet 134 of the housing 132. In one embodiment, the airflow source 108 is a fan, and the controller 102 controls the electrical power (e.g., voltage and current) supplied to the fan, which controls the revolutions per minute (RPM) of the fan and, hence, the airflow intensity. In other embodiments, the airflow source 108 may be another type of gas generator or storage device. For example, the airflow source 108 may be a CO2 cartridge, and the controller 102 may control a release rate of the CO2 from the cartridge.
This airflow through the housing 132 provides forced convection to promote increased delivery of the volatile agent 120 into the ambient environment. Although the airflow source 108 is shown as a separate component that is not within the housing 132 of the cartridge 130, in other embodiments the cartridge 130 may include different combinations of replaceable components, including the airflow source 108, the controller 102, the power source 110, and so forth.
The illustrated volatile agent source 104 electrochemically generates oxygen within a constrained enclosure 140. The oxygen may be generated by the to gas generator 122. The gas generator 122 may include a gas generating cell, or “gas cell”, containing copper hydroxide. The gas cell may include a resistor sized to result in a target current passing through the gas cell in response to the DC voltage. The resistor can be sized such that the nominal delivery period will be a set time period. When the DC voltage is applied to the gas cell, copper plates at the cathode while oxygen evolves at the anode. When the circuit is switched off, the electrochemical processes and the evolution of oxygen stop. In one embodiment, the gas cell delivers a specified amount of oxygen which correspondingly will deliver a substantially similar amount of the volatile agent 120 through an outlet 142 to the emanator 106.
In one embodiment, the constrained enclosure 140 implements a constrained double bag (CDB) arrangement. The CDB arrangement may provide orientation independence of the volatile agent source 104 and the delivery apparatus 100. The CDB arrangement includes a liquid bag 146 and a gas bag 148 within the constrained enclosure 140. The liquid bag 146 is impermeable to fluid transfer, except at the outlet 142, and contains the volatile agent 120. The gas bag 148 is impermeable to gas transfer, except at the inlet from the gas generator 122. Although the illustrated CDB arrangement is described as implementing a liquid bag 146 and a gas bag 148, in other embodiments, the CDB arrangement may include other types of volatile agent chambers and/or gas chambers that are formed without the use of bags.
In a specific embodiment, the liquid bag 146 and the gas bag 148 have an excess volume to allow for variations from the nominal conditions and still meet the critical delivery parameters. The liquid bag 146 may be constructed of material known to tolerate the chemical properties of the volatile agent 120. In one embodiment, the liquid bag 146 is constructed of Barex® made by INEOS. The gas bag 148 may be constructed of material known to have acceptable barrier properties with respect to the generated gas. Due to the constrained enclosure surrounding both the liquid bag 146 and the gas bag 148, as the gas bag 148 fills, the liquid bag 148 empties in a 1:1 relationship.
The fluid flow rate of the volatile agent 120 may be divided by the approximate cross sectional area to determine estimated flow velocity ranges. The evaporation of the volatile agent 120 may be estimated or determined at the to minimum and nominal temperatures at the minimum and nominal flow.
In the pre-delivery state shown in
In alternative embodiments, the gas generator 122 may include copper, hydroxide, alkali, carbon, carbonate, and/or mixtures thereof. In yet another embodiment, the gas generator 122 generates hydrogen gas. In another embodiment, the gas generator 122 includes a zinc anode and water.
The gas generated to fill the gas bag 148 is subject to known the gas laws:
V=nRT/P, where
In one embodiment, the moles of gas generated by the gas generator to 122 are about 2.6 e-6 per Amp-S. Thus, the higher the electrical current and longer time, the more gas will be contained in the gas bag 148.
Also, pressure varies with elevation approximately according to the relationship:
P(atmospheres)=[1−(2.25577e−5×H]5.25588
Thus, the gas volume for a given quantity of gas generated is greater at higher elevations. This pressure effect results in higher rates delivered at higher elevations. Thus, the amount of volatile agent 120 delivered can be greater. In order to control the amount of volatile agent 120 that is delivered at various elevations, it may be useful to standardize certain delivery parameters so that different, but acceptable amounts of volatile agent are delivered at each elevation level. In some embodiments, this standardized delivery approach may take into account the distribution of population as a function of elevation. Table 1 below shows a global population distribution versus elevation.
From the data of Table 1, approximately 82% of the population lives below 700 meters (2300 feet), 12% lives between 700-1,500 meters (2,300-4,921 feet), 4.5% lives between 1,500-2,000 meters (4,821-6,562 feet), and the remaining 1.5% live between about 2,000-3,100 meters (6,562-10,171 feet). This means that about 94% of the global population lives below 1500 meters.
Table 1 also shows the barometric pressure ranges corresponding to the various elevation ranges.
If the delivery device 100 discharges with negligible back pressure, then there will be approximately 8.4% difference in rate between users at sea level and users at 700 meters elevation (covering about 82% of the population). If that range is expanded to 1,500 meters (encompassing about 94% of the population), to then the difference is about 17.3%. Extending the range further to 2,000 meters (encompassing about 98.5% or the population), then the difference over the range is 22.5%. To encompass the virtually all the world population, up to 3,100 meters, the difference is 33.1%.
From a practical view, the 6% of the population living at elevations over 1,500 meters are accustomed to being required to make some adjustments from appliances, equipment, and cooking recipes due to the lower air pressure.
The effect of elevation can be reduced by operating the delivery device 100 with backpressure. For example, if a check valve (see
According to the gas law, the volume of the gas varies according to the absolute temperature. For example, if the nominal rate is based on operation at 22° C. (71.6° F., 295 K), the rate will be higher if the temperature is higher and lower of the temperature is lower. Raising the absolute temperature by 5% will result in 5% faster rate, increasing to 36.75° C. (98.1° F., 309.75 K). Decreasing absolute temperature by 5% will result in 5% lower rate, decreasing to 7.25° C. (45.0° F., 280.25 K). The temperature effect can be reduced somewhat by using a thermister (not shown) in the electrical circuit in combination with one or more resistors. For example, a thermister with rising resistance with temperature will reduce the rate at which oxygen is produced by the anode of the gas generator 122 if the temperature rises, offsetting the rise in gas volume occurring from the temperature rise, thus offsetting the effects.
In some embodiments, the gas generator 122 may take input voltage from an existing unit to be retrofitted or supplied within. In one embodiment, the gas generator 122 utilizes the same circuit as the airflow source 108. The pump rate to deliver the volatile agent 120 over a target duration under a set of nominal conditions is affected by variations in the input voltage. In one example, the actual voltage at the gas generator 122 is less than 0.5 V, so if the nominal line voltage is 12 V, then about 11.5 V will be brought down by use of a resistor (or resistor/thermistor combination). If the actual voltage is higher or lower than the nominal level, then the rate will be affected almost linearly—higher if the voltage is higher, and lower if the voltage is lower.
Some features of the embodiments may include selective delivery modes such as the duration and the rate of volatile agent delivery and operational parameters such as those listed in Table 2 below.
In one embodiment, a back pressure of 15 psi will approximately double the amount of copper hydroxide needed. Similarly, a back pressure of 30 psi will triple the amount. The area of the anode may be affected somewhat by the maximum rate contemplated by any of the operation mode scenarios.
Each of these performance parameters may be used to estimate the minimum area required or desired for the emanator 106 so that the volatile agent 120 can transfer from the liquid phase in the emanator 106 to the gas phase in the ambient air.
Also, by locating the volatile agent source 104 outside of the housing 132, the volatile agent source 104 does not block airflow within this housing 132. Consequently, in some embodiments transfer of the volatile agent 120 to the ambient environment may be increased due to the additional exposed area of the emanator 106.
In other embodiments, the housing 132 may have a different shape. For example, the housing 132 may have a conical shape so that the subassembly including the emanator 106 may have a cross section or two cross sections which are of smaller dimension than a third cross section, where the one of the smaller cross sections is oriented toward the inlet 134 and/or the outlet 136.
Although the operations of the method(s) herein are shown and described in a particular order, the order of the operations of each method may be altered so that certain operations may be performed in an inverse order or so that certain operations may be performed, at least in part, concurrently with other operations. In another embodiment, instructions or sub-operations of distinct operations may be implemented in an intermittent and/or alternating manner.
Although specific embodiments of the invention have been described and illustrated, the invention is not to be limited to the specific forms or arrangements of parts so described and illustrated. The scope of the invention is to be defined by the claims appended hereto and their equivalents.
This application claims the benefit of priority of U.S. Provisional Patent Application 61/493,127 entitled, “Orientation Independent Device For Delivery of Volatile Liquids to Gaseous Environment Utilizing an Electrochemical Gas Generating Cell” filed on Jun. 3, 2011. The contents of this application are incorporated by reference herein it their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
446953 | Robert | Feb 1891 | A |
575365 | Mayer et al. | Jan 1897 | A |
806844 | Rosenstock | Dec 1905 | A |
957449 | Walz | May 1910 | A |
976992 | Effantin et al. | Nov 1910 | A |
1099720 | Peck | Jun 1914 | A |
1222756 | Griner | Apr 1917 | A |
1921821 | Higgins | Aug 1933 | A |
2219959 | Laidley | Oct 1940 | A |
2236525 | Davis et al. | Apr 1941 | A |
2481296 | Dupuy | Sep 1949 | A |
2670236 | Bradburn | Feb 1954 | A |
2710164 | Hare | Jun 1955 | A |
2740662 | Scott | Apr 1956 | A |
2801879 | Dick | Aug 1957 | A |
2867360 | Sharma | Jan 1959 | A |
2991517 | Bundy | Jul 1961 | A |
3127786 | Wooley | Apr 1964 | A |
3169705 | Geiger | Feb 1965 | A |
3254841 | Loncker | Jun 1966 | A |
3482929 | Gentil | Dec 1969 | A |
3685734 | Paciorek et al. | Aug 1972 | A |
3804592 | Garbe et al. | Apr 1974 | A |
3955930 | Shapiro | May 1976 | A |
4017030 | Coplan et al. | Apr 1977 | A |
4158440 | Sullivan et al. | Jun 1979 | A |
4166478 | Sugimura et al. | Sep 1979 | A |
4169757 | Kirjavainen | Oct 1979 | A |
4265373 | Stoody | May 1981 | A |
4294778 | Deluca | Oct 1981 | A |
4312347 | Magoon et al. | Jan 1982 | A |
4328843 | Fujii | May 1982 | A |
4339079 | Sato et al. | Jul 1982 | A |
4399942 | Chand | Aug 1983 | A |
4408635 | Packer | Oct 1983 | A |
4427030 | Jouwsma | Jan 1984 | A |
4468220 | Willbanks | Aug 1984 | A |
4477414 | Muramoto et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4522698 | Maget | Jun 1985 | A |
4526320 | von Philipp et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4552561 | Eckenhoff et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4621768 | Lhoste et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4632310 | Konicek | Dec 1986 | A |
4674494 | Wiencek | Jun 1987 | A |
4687423 | Maget et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4697549 | Hair | Oct 1987 | A |
4753389 | Davis | Jun 1988 | A |
4809912 | Santini | Mar 1989 | A |
4846003 | Marquiss | Jul 1989 | A |
4871544 | Eckenhoff | Oct 1989 | A |
4886514 | Maget | Dec 1989 | A |
4917301 | Munteanu | Apr 1990 | A |
4948047 | Zembrodt | Aug 1990 | A |
4966767 | Eckenhoff | Oct 1990 | A |
4969874 | Michel et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4995555 | Woodruff | Feb 1991 | A |
5074252 | Morgan, Jr. | Dec 1991 | A |
5143259 | Williams | Sep 1992 | A |
5161680 | Badgley | Nov 1992 | A |
5196002 | Hanover et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5312389 | Theeuwes et al. | May 1994 | A |
5357793 | Jouwsma | Oct 1994 | A |
5368863 | Eckenhoff et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5398851 | Sancoff et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5427870 | Joshi et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5437410 | Babasade | Aug 1995 | A |
5454922 | Joshi et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5462741 | Carr et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5474785 | Wright et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5538605 | Joshi et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5549037 | Stumphauzer et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5567287 | Joshi et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5591395 | Schroeder et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5591409 | Watkins | Jan 1997 | A |
5593552 | Joshi et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5638868 | Loran | Jun 1997 | A |
5647515 | Zwijnenberg et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5681435 | Joshi et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5700245 | Sancoff et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5707499 | Joshi et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5714160 | Magruder et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5744014 | Gordon et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5765751 | Joshi | Jun 1998 | A |
5785688 | Joshi et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5810253 | Ohayon | Sep 1998 | A |
5855761 | Joshi | Jan 1999 | A |
5857590 | Kao et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5871125 | Gross | Feb 1999 | A |
5899381 | Gordon et al. | May 1999 | A |
5915925 | North, Jr. | Jun 1999 | A |
5921251 | Joshi | Jul 1999 | A |
5932204 | Joshi | Aug 1999 | A |
5951538 | Joshi et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5954268 | Joshi et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5971713 | North, Jr. | Oct 1999 | A |
5993854 | Needleman et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5997821 | Joshi | Dec 1999 | A |
6042704 | Joshi et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6045055 | Joshi et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6060196 | Gordon et al. | May 2000 | A |
6082117 | Funatsu et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6109539 | Joshi et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6135126 | Joshi | Oct 2000 | A |
6220267 | Joshi | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6283461 | Joshi et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6289241 | Phipps | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6378780 | Martens, III et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6415808 | Joshi | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6419163 | Joshi | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6491684 | Joshi et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6527012 | Weber | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6553712 | Majerowski et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6622755 | Weber | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6715300 | Longsworth | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6729552 | McEwen et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6786474 | Watkins et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6787008 | Joshi et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6805306 | Huang | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6813944 | Mayer et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6901965 | Baltes et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6923383 | Joshi | Aug 2005 | B1 |
7048009 | Verhaeghe | May 2006 | B2 |
7149417 | Joshi et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7614568 | Joshi et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
8061280 | Gordon et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8113390 | Wold et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8353426 | Wold et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
20020158156 | Joshi et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020175191 | Joshi et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030094503 | Rymer et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20040135005 | Duquet | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040261790 | Joshi et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050023371 | Joshi et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050035143 | Massaro et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050150449 | Matsunaga et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050175331 | Tam et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050218074 | Pollock | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050279776 | Decottignies et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060039685 | Berrido et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20070001024 | Wold et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070025869 | Gordon | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20080191370 | Pankhurst et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080257412 | Gordon | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080308647 | Maget et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090173799 | Litten-Brown et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20100015009 | Wallace et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100022993 | Gordon et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100222770 | Gordon et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110303760 | Joshi et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120031497 | Gordon | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120031503 | Gordon | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120031513 | Gordon | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120037242 | Gordon et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120037658 | Gordon et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120160930 | Joshi | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20130026194 | Wold et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2082589 | Dec 1971 | FR |
191400142 | Jan 1914 | GB |
00374140 | Jan 1940 | JP |
4221275 | Dec 1967 | JP |
1558961978 | May 1980 | JP |
913801983 | Sep 1983 | JP |
62-33102 | Feb 1987 | JP |
3058701988 | Dec 1988 | JP |
1818711989 | Jul 1989 | JP |
646481991 | Jun 1991 | JP |
701411991 | Jul 1991 | JP |
001561993 | Jan 1993 | JP |
05-262602 | Oct 1993 | JP |
3174011993 | Dec 1993 | JP |
1553671995 | Jun 1995 | JP |
1827831997 | Jul 1997 | JP |
09-253185 | Sep 1997 | JP |
09-276386 | Oct 1997 | JP |
2763871997 | Oct 1997 | JP |
472531999 | Feb 1999 | JP |
0724201 | Aug 2008 | JP |
WO-8808308 | Nov 1988 | WO |
0072951 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO-0076645 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO-2004020005 | Mar 2004 | WO |
2006007559 | Jan 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Hwu, Davis D., “PCT International Search Report for PCT/US05/23523”, (Dec. 4, 2006),1-3. |
Hwu, Davis D., “PCT Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for PCT/US05/23523”, (Dec. 4, 2006),1-3. |
Nguyen, Dinh Q., “PCT International Search Report for PCT/US05/21022”, (May 10, 2007),1-3. |
Nguyen, Dinh Q., “PCT Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for PCT/US05/21022”, (May 10, 2007),1-3. |
Nguyen, Dinh Q., “Office Action Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 10/868,203”, (Aug. 14, 2007),1-5. |
Kim, Christopher S., “Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/649,563 sent Sep. 10, 2003”,1-5. |
Kim, Christopher S., “Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/649,563 send Apr. 13, 2004”,1-6. |
Kim, Christopher S., “Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/649,563 sent Aug. 25, 2006”,1-6. |
Kim, Christophe S., “Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/649,563 sent Jun. 12, 2007”,1-7. |
Nguyen, Dinh “Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/160,642 sent May 1, 2008”,1-7. |
Kim, “Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/649,563 sent Feb. 15, 2008”,1-9. |
Nguyen, Dinh “Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/868,203 sent Mar. 17, 2008”,1-7. |
Varga, Viktoria “European Search Report for EP05790118.3 sent Nov. 7, 2007”,1-3. |
Joshi, et al., “Application for U.S. Appl. No. 09/649,563 filed Aug. 28, 2000”,1-33. |
Kim, “Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/649,563 sent Jul. 9, 2008”,1-8. |
Varga, Viktoria “Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC”, (Aug. 20, 2008),1-6. |
Kim, “Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/649,563 sent Dec. 30, 2008”,1-8. |
Nguyen, Dinh “Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/868,203 sent Dec. 15, 2008”,1-6. |
Nguyen, Dinh “Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/160,642 sent Dec. 10, 2008”, 1-8. |
Kang, Sang Yoon “Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority”, International App. No. PCT/US2008/080988, (Jul. 2, 2009),1-4. |
Kang, Sang Yoon “International Search Report”, International App. No. PCT/US2008/080988, (Jul. 2, 2009),1-3. |
Kim, Myeong Hee “International Search Report”, International Search Report for PCT/US2010/057421, (Aug. 26, 2011),1-3. |
Kim, Myeong Hee “Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority”, Written Opinion for PCT/US2010/057421, (Aug. 26, 2011),1-4. |
Shelborne, K “Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 08/880,124, (Apr. 13, 1998),1-6. |
Shelborne, K “Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 08/880,124, (Oct. 6, 1998),1-3. |
Guillem, Gisbert I., “European Search Report”, EP app. No. 98930214.6 (corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 08/880,124), (Dec. 28, 2009),1-3. |
Guillem, Gisbert I., “Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC (European Office Action)”, EP App No. 98930214.6 (corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 08/880,124), (Oct. 15, 2010),1-6. |
Kokubo, Katsui “Notice of Reason for Rejection”, JP App. No. 11-504624 (Corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 08/880,124), (Jul. 29, 2008),1-5. |
Nakazawa, Noboru “Notice of Reason for Rejection”, JP App. No. 11-504624 (Corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 08/880,124), (May 19, 2009),1-6. |
Unknown, “English Translation of Utility Model Publication JP 42-21275”, Translation of JP 42-21275 (supplied by Japanese patent office), (Dec. 7, 1967),1-4. |
Kawamura, Norio “English Abstract of JP 07-24201”, English Abstract of JP 07-24201, (Aug. 21, 2008),1-2. |
Lawrence, Dorithia “International Search Report”, PCT US 98/12379 (corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 08/880,124), (Sep. 30, 1998),1. |
Shelborne, Kathryne E., “International Preliminary Examination Report”, PCT US 98/12379 (corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 08/880,124), (Feb. 11, 1999),1-4. |
Weldon, K “Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 09/028,372, (Jun. 22, 1999),1-7. |
Weldon, K “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 09/028,372, (Nov. 15, 1999),1-7. |
Moeremans, Benoit “Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC”, EP App. No. 99925948.4, (Sep. 12, 2011),1-5. |
Honma, T “Official Notice of Reason of Preliminary Rejection (Japan)”, JP App. No. 621054/2000 (Corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 09/028,372), (Mar. 23, 2004),1-4. |
Honma, T “Official Notice of Reason of Preliminary Rejection”, JP App. No. 621054/2000 (Corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 09/028,372), (Jun. 14, 2005),1-3. |
Unknown Japanese Patent Examiner, “Official Notice of Reason for Final Rejection”, JP App. No. 621054/2000 (Corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 09/028,372), (May 30, 2006),1. |
Inoue, Perfume “English Abstract”, JP App. No. 64648/1991, (Jun. 24, 1991),1. |
Rifure Co., “English Abstract (Abridged)”, JP App. No. 70141/1991, (Jul. 12, 1991),1. |
Sakomoto, Susumu “English Abstract”, JP patent No. 1181871, (Jul. 19, 1989),1. |
Yamamori, Seiji “English Abstract”, JP Patent App. No. 5000156 (JP Opened Patent App. No. 00156/1993), (Jan. 8, 1993),1. |
Kubo, Tsugio “English Abstract”, JP Patent App. No. 317401/1993, (Dec. 3, 1993),1. |
Pola Chemical, “English Abstract (abridged)”, JP App. No. 72491/1980, (May 20, 1980),1. |
Horiuchi, Tetsoshirou “English Abstract”, JP patent app. No. 155367/1995, (Jun. 20, 1995),1. |
Yokoyama, Mitsuhiro “English Abstract”, JP Patent App. No. 182783/1997, (Jul. 15, 1997),1. |
Nakamura, Shigemi “English Abstract”, JP App. No. 276387/1997, (Oct. 28, 1997),1. |
Nakayama, Toru “English Abstract”, JP App. No. 047253/1999, (Feb. 23, 1999),1. |
Maget, Henri “English Abstract”, JP App. No. 91380/1983, (Sep. 6, 1983),1. |
Nishimura, Haruo “English Abstract”, JP App. No. 305870/1988, (Dec. 13, 1988),1. |
Hatta, O. “English Abstract (abridged)”, JP App. No. 00374/1940, (Jan. 16, 1940),1. |
Bushey, Scott “International Search Report”, PCT US 99/11775 (corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 09/028,372), (Aug. 20, 1999),1-2. |
Bushey, Scott “Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority”, PCT US 99/11775 (corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 09/028,372), (Jun. 11, 2001),1-4. |
Kim, Christopher “Non Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 09/649,563, (Jan. 21, 2003),1-5. |
Zheng, Li “Notification of the First Office Action”, Chinese Application 200580008690.4 (corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 10/708,253), (Jul. 3, 2009),1-6. |
Unknown Japanese Patent Examiner, “Japanese Office Action (and English translation Summary)”, JP App. No. 2006/554202 (Corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 10/708,253), (Nov. 24, 2010),1-6. |
Paik, Sang Y., “International Search Report”, PCT US 05/05031 (Corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 10/708,253), (Oct. 14, 2005),1-4. |
Paik, Sang Y., “Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority”, PCT US 05/05031 (Corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 10/708,253), (Oct. 14, 2005),1-4. |
Paik, Sang Y., “Non Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/708,253, (Jul. 1, 2005),1-7. |
Paik, Sang Y., “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/708,253, (Apr. 10, 2006),1-6. |
Shearer, Daniel “Non Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/323,332, (Apr. 23, 2012),1-9. |
Wood, Jonathan “Non Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/923,490, (Feb. 15, 2011),1-15. |
Shearer, Daniel “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/923,490, (Aug. 16, 2011),1-10. |
Bae, Yeo W., “International Search Report”, PCT/US2011/066895 (corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 13/335,192., (Jul. 30, 2012),1-3. |
Bae, Yeo W., “Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority”, PCT/US2011/066895 (corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 13/335,192)., (Jul. 30, 2012),1-5. |
Horikiri, et al., “Patent Abstracts of Japan (English Translation)”, Japanese Publication No. 05-262602, (Oct. 12, 1993),1. |
Okada, Yoshiro “Bibliographical Data and English Abstract”, JP Patent App. No. 62-033102, (Feb. 13, 1987),1-2. |
Shearer, Daniel R., “Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/323,341, (Jan. 30, 2013),1-10. |
Nakamura, Shigemi “English Language Abstract”, JP Patent Publication No. 09-276386, (Oct. 28, 1997),1-2. |
Nakamura, Shigemi “English Language Abstract”, JP Patent Publication No. 09-253185, (Sep. 30, 1997),1-2. |
Kim, Seung B., “International Search Report”, PCT App. No. PCT/US2012/040743 (Corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 13/487,976), (Jul. 25, 2013),1-9. |
Kim, Seung B., “Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority”, PCT App. No. PCT/US2012/040743 (Corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 13/487,976), (Jul. 25, 2013),1-4. |
Shearer, Daniel R., “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/323,341, (Jun. 4, 2013),1-12. |
Kim, Christopher S., “Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/950,053, (Mar. 12, 2013),1-5. |
Kim, Christopher S., “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/950,053, (Jul. 25, 2013),1-9. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120305667 A1 | Dec 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61493127 | Jun 2011 | US |