The invention concerns a device for detecting and counting shots fired by an automatic or semi-automatic firearm and a firearm equipped with such a device.
From the fighter's point of view, one of the most essential characteristics of the firearm is its availability, i.e. its capacity to be fully operational during operations. This implies not only that the firearm must be liable, but that it is also subjected to an appropriate preventive maintenance whereby the manner in which the firearm has been used is taken into account.
Indeed, an automatic or semi-automatic firearm contains moving parts which are subject to wear and tear during the life of the firearm, and which may thus interrupt the firing if the firearm is not maintained in a regular and preventive manner.
The moving parts of a firearm carry out a to-and-fro movement in the axial direction of the barrel between a front position and a rear position, whereby this movement allows for the recock while firing, i.e. the extraction out of the chamber of the fired cartridge casing, its ejection, followed by the introduction of a new cartridge in the empty chamber, either in semi-automatic mode, also called in rapid succession, or in burst mode.
This sequence of operations may also be carried out in another order, i.e. introduction of a new cartridge in the empty chamber, firing of the ammunition, extraction of the fired cartridge casing out of the chamber and ejection.
This to-and-fro movement usually takes place in a direction which is parallel to the axis of the barrel of the firearm.
The energy which provokes the recoil movement is supplied by the device which activates the mechanism, the latter being either a gas intake mechanism or a short recoil mechanism of the barrel, or also a long recoil mechanism of the barrel, or a mechanism of the ‘blowback’ type or ‘retarded blowback’ type, whereby this list is not limitative.
The energy provoking the return movement of the mechanism is supplied by a return spring which is compressed during the recoil phase.
The wear of the firearm and thus the maintenance to be provided mainly depend on the to-and-fro movements of the moving parts and thus on the conditions of use of the firearm, such as the number of shots fired and the firing conditions as well as the rate of fire.
That is why it is important for the firearm to have a ‘black box’ which detects and registers said conditions of use.
Several methods and devices have already been suggested to detect and register the shots fired by a firearm.
The method of U.S. Pat. No. 5,033,217 is based on the use of a control element to assess the number of shots fired by an arm in a visual manner.
Thus, there is no actual counting, but merely a visualization, without any further indications about the use of the firearm, in particular regarding the firing conditions it has been subjected to.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,566,486 and US patent application 2005/114084 describe devices for counting the shots fired, based on the detection of the impulse of the recoil shock of the firearm, by mechanical or electronic sensors respectively.
These known devices that react to shocks reaching a level which is supposed to correspond to the recoil of the firearm when firing have two major disadvantages:
Moreover, these known devices register a shot being fired, without any further information about the kinematic behavior of the firearm while firing, so that one can only form an idea about the preventive maintenance requirements for the firearm.
The invention aims to avoid one or several of these disadvantages.
The principle of the invention is based on the finding that, when firing, for every fired shot, the firearm experiences accelerations in the axial direction of the barrel, whereby these accelerations are due to a succession of shocks produced when a shot is fired and caused by the to-and-fro movements of the moving parts, and the finding that the progression in time of the accelerations is typical for a firearm and for the type of ammunition used, thus forming a typical signature for the firearm and for the type of fired ammunition.
The aim of the invention is reached with a device for detecting and counting shots fired by an automatic or semi-automatic firearm, which comprises an accelerometer with a pass band which is sensitive to shocks in the axial direction of the barrel and a microprocessor for analyzing the signal of the accelerometer while firing, whereby the microprocessor is equipped with an algorithm to count the number of shots fired, based on the discernment and recording of a shot being fired on the basis of the detection, in the signal of the accelerometer, of all or part of the characteristic elements of the acceleration signature which is typical of the type of firearm and of the different types of ammunition used, whereby these characteristic elements are recorded beforehand in a memory of the device.
The use of the accelerometer makes it possible to perform a detailed analysis of the acceleration phenomena occurring in the firearm while firing, independently of the recoil level of the firearm, and thus of the different factors that have an effect on the latter.
According to a preferred embodiment, the algorithm makes it possible to distinguish the type of ammunition used depending on whether at least a part of or certain characteristic elements of the acceleration signature have occurred which correspond to the signature of the type of ammunition used, for example in order to discern blanks from live ammunitions, taking into account the direction of the first initial shock.
According to another preferred characteristic, the device makes it possible to measure and to memorize the time interval between the first and the second shock, whereby this interval corresponds to the time of the recoil of the moving parts of the firearm.
The thus registered time of the recoil provides important information about the behavior of the firearm and the quality of its adjustment, thus allowing for a diagnosis and/or adjustment of the firearm.
The invention also concerns an automatic or semi-automatic firearm equipped with a device according to the invention.
In order to further illustrate the invention, the following examples of embodiments of a device according to the invention for detecting and counting shots fired by an automatic or semi-automatic firearm are described hereafter by way of example only and without being limitative in any way, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
The device 1 is a ‘black box’ so to say, designed to be mounted on or to be integrated in a firearm and it is formed of:
The device 1 is preferably small and it can thus be easily integrated in most firearms, for example in the grip of the latter.
The components 1 to 6 can be mounted as a whole on one and the same board, whereby the device 1 then forms a stand-alone module which does not need to be connected anywhere inside the firearm.
The working principle of the device 1 is based on the use of an accelerometer 2 with an appropriate pass band and a particular algorithm for processing the signal supplied by said accelerometer which detects and analyses in that signal the events linked to the kinematic phenomena that occur when firing, such that it can be determined with certainty whether a shot has been fired and such that it becomes possible to discern between a blank and a live cartridge, whereby shocks due to falls, recocks or releases are excluded, whereby parameters can be set for said algorithm and these parameters can be adjusted as a function of the characteristics of the type of firearm concerned.
We distinguish this succession of events in signal S in
The time between the three shocks, as well as the duration of the three “calm zones” D and E are situated within ranges that are characteristic of that type of firearm, whereby the specific values of said time periods for a given firearm are influenced by the setting of the firearm and in how far it is oiled and used.
Thus, the signal S so to say is the signature of the firearm.
We see the same succession of events A to E as when firing live cartridges, with this difference that the initial impulse A is weaker and in the opposite direction.
The algorithm to discern and register whether a shot has been fired consists in analyzing in the signal S supplied by the accelerometer 2 whether all or part of the events A to E are present in order to conclude whether a shot has been fired.
The activation of the algorithm can depend, for example, on the finding that a threshold 7 has been crossed by the signal S of the accelerometer 2, as indicated in
In a particular embodiment of the algorithm, the direction of the initial impulse A is used to determine whether a blank cartridge or live cartridge has been fired.
A preferred embodiment of the device 1 takes the intervals between the three shocks A, B and/or C into account, as well as the duration of the “calm zones” D and/or E which, in order to be accepted as criteria to determine whether a shot has been fired, must be situated within plausible time ranges, typical for the type of firearm concerned, whereby these ranges are programmable parameters of the algorithm.
It should be noted that the second shock B caused by the rear abutment of the moving parts may either not exist or may be too weak to be taken into account; the absence of this second shock B generally indicates a setting error and a restricted functioning of the firearm, whereby a insufficient amount of energy is recycled by the moving parts to guarantee the recock of the firearm.
On the other hand, a shock B situated at a level which is too high, due to too much energy being recycled at the level of the moving parts, indicates a bad setting of the firearm which may result in excessive wear or elements being broken.
Thus, the measurement of the level of this second shock B is representative for the kinematic behavior of the firearm. In order to be no longer dependant on exterior factors, such as the weight of accessories fixed on the firearm or the way in which the firearm is held while firing, which may affect the absolute level of the different shocks, it is advantageous to base oneself, not on the absolute level of shock B, but on the relationship between the measurement of this second shock B and that of shocks A and/or C.
According to a specific embodiment of the process, the “lack of recoil”, i.e. the absence of the second shock B while firing, is memorized as a particular event associated with said firing, which indicates a bad functioning of the firearm.
The recoil time RT of the moving parts, characterized by the interval between the first shock A and the second shock B as indicated in
In another particular embodiment of the device 1 according to the invention, this parameter is measured and memorized so as to allow for a diagnosis and/or adjustment of the firearm.
Moreover, the microprocessor 3 can, based for example on its internal clock, measure the interval between two shots that are fired, and thus determine the bursts and their lengths, i.e. identify the firing conditions which are determinative as far as the wear of the elements is concerned. It can also measure the rates when firing by bursts.
This capacity may be used to indicate the shooter in real time that he/she has reached the permissible firing conditions for the firearm when firing by bursts or that he/she has exceeded it.
In another specific embodiment of the device 1 according to the invention, the maximum level of the signal produced by the shock B is measured and memorized so as to allow for the diagnosis and/or the adjustment of the firearm.
In another specific embodiment of the device 1 according to the invention, the relation between the maximum level of the signal produced by the shock B and the maximum level of the initial shock A and/or the maximum level of the closing shock C is calculated and memorized so as to allow for the diagnosis and/or the adjustment of the firearm.
Such a function is particularly useful in the case of machine guns.
The ability of the device 1 to continuously keep track of the firing conditions may also be used to act directly on the mechanism of the firearm 12, via a mechanical interface or an actuator 13 as indicated in
To this end, one only has to register a table or a chart in the memory 4 of the microprocessor 5 which defines, as a function of the length of the shots, the number of shots fired on the basis of which the operation mode of the firearm must be commutated.
As represented in
One may also include in the device 1 a localization system 15, of the GPS type for example, either in combination with the clock 14 or on its own, which enables the microprocessor 3 to register the position of the firearm for every fired shot in the memory 4.
In short, the above-described devices make it possible to detect and record the shots fired, possibly also to make a distinction between the blank and live cartridges fired, and to continuously analyze the kinematic behavior of the firearm, namely by measuring the recoil time of the moving parts, such that adjustment errors or performance drifts due to wear of the elements may be detected.
In a broader sense, the above-described devices make it possible to continuously control the use and efficiency of the firearm in real time by indicating anomalies or dangerous firing conditions to the shooter, or even by acting on the firing mechanism so as to adjust its operation, for example, so as to provoke the transition from firing with a locked bolt to firing with an open bolt, in order to avoid any spontaneous ignition of the ammunition in the chamber.
It is clear that every type of firearm is characterized by its own to-and-fro sequence of the moving parts and thus by its own acceleration signature with a succession of shocks and calm zones that are specific to the firearm and the ammunition used.
In the case of a firearm of the ‘open bolt’ type, the to-and-fro sequence of the moving parts takes place in the following manner:
Certain measures are necessary in order to manage the energy source.
The lifetime of the energy source 6 of the device 1, for example a cell, is a major acceptation criterion for the concept.
Ideally, the cell should be irreplaceable and inaccessible, and it should last the whole life through of the firearm while being small-sized.
More reasonably, it is acceptable to replace the cell during every preventive maintenance, at least in the case of military firearms which are subject to regular and programmed maintenance services.
The power consumption of the device 1 may be minimized by managing the active modes and sleep modes of the electronic circuits 16, such that the latter are only fully current-fed when necessary.
A first method, illustrated in
A second method consists in using a switch 17 which is a sensor that detects when the grip is taken in hand.
The above-mentioned sensor is, for example, a capacitive sensor of the Q-Prox® type, whose constant current when in rest is in the order of about ten microampere.
A third method consists in using a switch 17 in the form of a shock sensor, activated as of a certain predetermined shock level.
This shock sensor is designed to detect any shock which may correspond to the initial impulse A of a shot being fired, and to turn on the device as soon as said shock is detected.
As represented in
Use is preferably made of a bidirectional shock sensor 17 which is normally open, which is only sensitive to shocks produced in one or other direction of its axis of detection, which is fixed to the firearm in such a manner that its axis of detection X-X′ is parallel to the axis of the barrel Y-Y′ and whose sensitivity is selected in such a manner that it will react to impulse levels corresponding to blank cartridges or live cartridges being fired.
It should be noted that it may take several milliseconds to activate the circuits 16 of the device 1, as soon as they are turned on, in which case the initial impulse corresponding to the first shock A will not be perceived.
This is no obstacle to the application of the algorithm, since the fact that the device is being charged indicates that there has been such a shock A.
However, the direction of the initial impulse of the first shock A, which makes it possible to discern between a blank cartridge and a live cartridge being fired, is not identified in this case.
This disadvantage can be remedied by making use, as represented in
The locking circuit 18 of the power supply 6 only has to memorize then which of the two sensors 19 or 20 has initiated the charge to enable the microprocessor 3 of the device 1 to make the distinction.
An advantage of the device 1 shown in
If the microprocessor 3 can be put into standby mode, in which mode it consumes very little current, for example less than one microampere, and if it does not take long to reactivate it and to get it out of said standby mode, for example a few tens of microseconds, it is advantageous to use the above-described sensors, not to turn on the device, but to wake up the microprocessor 3 out of standby mode, as illustrated in
In
The special embodiment of
In this manner, the microprocessor determines, by identifying which of the two sensors has reactivated it first, the direction of the initial impulse, such that a distinction can be made between a blank cartridge and a live cartridge being fired.
It is clear that the invention is by no means restricted to the above-described examples, but that numerous modifications can be made to the devices for detecting and counting the shots being fired by an automatic or semi-automatic firearm as described above while still remaining within the scope of the invention as defined in the following claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2006/0396 | Jul 2006 | BE | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3090914 | Kabak | May 1963 | A |
3792638 | Cox et al. | Feb 1974 | A |
4001961 | Johnson et al. | Jan 1977 | A |
4102074 | Andre | Jul 1978 | A |
5033217 | Brennan | Jul 1991 | A |
5142805 | Horne et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5406730 | Sayre | Apr 1995 | A |
5566486 | Brinkley | Oct 1996 | A |
5827991 | Predazzer | Oct 1998 | A |
6305941 | Kotsiopoulos et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6643968 | Glock | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6785996 | Danner et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6948487 | Rice et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7100437 | Johnson et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7143644 | Johnson et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7234260 | Acarreta | Jun 2007 | B2 |
20030061753 | Glock | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20050114084 | Johnson et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050155420 | Johnson et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20060042142 | Sinha | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060053671 | Weinberger | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060096144 | Delgado Acarreta | May 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
40 22 038 | Jan 1992 | DE |
44 17 545 | Nov 1995 | DE |
10 2005 011 218 | Sep 2005 | DE |
1 300 648 | Apr 2003 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080016744 A1 | Jan 2008 | US |