The present invention relates to emanation systems for volatile liquids and, more particularly, to a wick-based emanation system incorporating a fan mounted in a housing for dispersing the volatile liquid.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
In alternative embodiments, wick 310 may be formed to have a width dimension W which does not exceed 80 times the dimension R, 0.60 times the dimension R, etc.
Referring now to FIGS. 1 and 7-10, wick 310 is to be positioned and secured in enclosure 40 formed by housing 30 and so as to reside in the air stream generated by fan 32. Wick 310 may be secured in the desired position by coupling wick 310 to dispenser housing 30 using any one of numerous methods.
Referring to
Referring to
In an alternative embodiment (not shown), a receptacle for wick 310 may be formed on dispenser housing 30 for placement of wick 310 directly therein. The receptacle would be positioned on dispenser housing 30 such that a wick received therein resides in an air stream generated by fan 32 as described above.
Examples of other retention structures suitable for the purpose described above are disclosed in co-pending patent application entitled “Container For A Device For Dispensing Volatile Liquid”, incorporated herein by reference, and filed Mar. 21, 2003.
As stated previously, the volatile liquid migrates along wick 310 from the reservoir to the exterior of container 20 where it is evaporated from the surface of wick 310 by forced airflow generated by a motorized fan mounted in housing 100. Detailed descriptions of some representative wick structures which may be incorporated into the dispenser of the present invention are provided in co-pending patent applications having U.S. Ser. Nos. 10/266,512; 10/266,798; and 10/266,546 and are incorporated herein by reference.
Referring to
In addition, the neck 330 of the container 20 may be shaped so that a cover 300 can be securely fastened over the wick 310 and neck closure 320. For example, the outer neck 330 of the container 20 may be threaded so that cover 330 can be screwed on top of the container 20 when the device is not in use.
Referring again to
The neck closure 320 or neck 330 of the container 20 may be formed with a small hole (e.g., a vent-hole) to help counter the effects of a vacuum that can form in the head-space of the container 20. The wick 310 transports the liquid to the surface of the wick 310 by a principle called capillary action. In particular, the wick material contains numerous pores, and these pores act as capillaries, which cause the liquid to be drawn into them. As the liquid is drawn from the container and transported up the porous wick 310, a vacuum is created in the head-space of the container 20. The formation of a vacuum in the head-space of the container 20 decreases the rate that the liquid is wicked from the reservoir to the surface. This decrease in the wicking rate translates directly into a decrease in the release rate of the liquid to the ambient air. Accordingly, in order to combat the formation of the vacuum in the head-space, it is often preferable to form a vent-hole in the vicinity of the head-space of the container 20. However, if the container 20 is overturned, either during shipping or, later, during handling of the bottle by the consumer, it is possible for the concentrated liquid in the container 20 to leak out of the vent-hole. Therefore, if is preferable to design a device that does not require a vent-hole.
It has been found that if the pore size of the wick 310 is below a critical size, the vent-hole can be eliminated without sacrificing the release rate of the vaporizable liquid into the ambient air. Because the capillary force increases as the pore size of the wick 310 decreases, a wick 310 with very small porosity has a very strong capillary force. This strong capillary force allows the wick 310 to continue to be able to transport the liquid from the container 20 to the surface of the wick 310 even though a vacuum has formed in the head-space of the container 20. In other words, a wick 310 with a very small pore size is able to overcome the vacuum effect that is present in the head-space of the container 20.
The critical size of the wick 310 is determined by the surface tension of the liquid, the compatibility of the wick 310 and liquid (i.e., the contact angle), and the extent to which a vacuum is generated with the head-space of the container 20. In particular, we have found that if the wick 310 is manufactured with a mean pore size that is below about four microns, the effects of a vacuum in the head-space of the container 20 can be greatly decreased. Specifically, we have found that it is most preferable that the mean pore size of the wick 310 be below about one micron. When the wick 310 has a mean pore size of below four microns, and preferably below one micron, we have found that the wick 310 is still able to effectively function to transport the liquid from the container 20 to the surface of the wick 310.
When using a device of this invention, it is not necessary to provide a vent-hole in the upper part of the container 20, or in the neck closure 320 because the vacuum effects are substantially decreased. By eliminating the vent-hole, the problem of spillage or leakage that occurs as a result of the existence of the vent-hole is also eliminated.
The mean pore size of the wick 310 can be determined by any standard test for determining porosity and pore size distribution. For example, mercury porosimetry is a method that gives information on porosity and pore size distribution for rigid wicks. It is based on the measurement of differential increments in the amount of mercury intruded into the wick 310 as a function of increasing applied pressure.
It has also been found that another advantage in using a wick 310 with a mean porosity of below about four microns, and preferably below about one micron, is that the lower porosity decreases the likelihood of the liquid spilling or leaking through the wick 310 itself. Since the upper surface of the wick 310 is exposed to the ambient air, if the container 20 is overturned, it is possible for liquid to leak out through a wick of conventional pore sizes. Using a smaller porosity wick 310 of this invention, however, decreases the ability of the liquid to travel through the wick 310 when the container 20 is overturned.
The wick 310 can be made of a variety of materials. It is preferable that the wick 310 be rigid enough to provide minimal contact area with the surface that the wick 310 comes in contact with. Polymeric wicks, for example, have been found to be effective for these purposes. In particular, wicks composed of ultra high molecular weight, high density polyethylene (HDPE) have been found to be suitable. Such wicks are generally comprised of blends of HDPE in particle form, and the blends are developed to meet the target pore characteristics of the wick 310.
Preferably, the solubility parameter of the polymer used in the wick 310 is significantly different from that of any of the components contained in the liquid. This prevents the wick 310 from swelling (or other changes) that may lead to a change in the pore size and porosity of the wick 310, which would consequently affect the release rate of the vaporizable liquid into the ambient air.
The wick 310 can also be made in a variety of shapes.
Referring to
As shown in
It is often desired that the volatile liquid dispenser described herein exhibit an initial spike in the release rate of the volatile liquid when the device is first activated. For example, when a fragrance dispensing device is activated, an initial spike in the release rate of the volatile liquid fragrance compound is desired in order to quickly disperse into the air a sufficient amount of the fragrance compound to effectively decrease the number of insects in the surrounding area. Once an optimum level of fragrance compound is present in the ambient air of the operating area, however, the release rate of the fragrance compound should be decreased to an amount that is sufficient to maintain that optimum level. By having two sections of varying pore size exposed to the ambient air at the same time, it is possible to achieve an initial spike effect.
Referring to
In the wick embodiments described above, the cylindrical shape of the large pore section 360 is also narrowed at its lower portion. The pore size of the lower portion of large pore section 360, however, does not change with this change in diameter. Importantly, this change in shape is not required for achieving the initial spike effect. Instead, this variation in shape can be useful in that it both increases the amount of the surface area exposed to the ambient air and aids in forming a tighter seal at the neck 330 area of the container 20 (
In the above-described embodiments, the wick is longitudinal, has a longitudinal axis and a curved exterior surface. In alternative embodiments, the wick may be formed such that a cross-section of the wick taken perpendicular to the longitudinal axis has any one of a variety of simple geometric shapes, such as a circle, a diamond, a rectangle, a hexagon, an octagon, an oval or a triangle.
The present invention provides a structure and method for controlling the size of a profile of a wick immersed in an air stream relative to the size of a fan used to generate the air stream. This allows the resistance to the air stream produced by the wick to be minimized. When combined with the positioning of the wick within the air stream, this enables the linear velocity of the air flowing around the wick to be maximized, thereby ensuring rapid and efficient dissemination of a volatile substance drawn through the wick from a reservoir.
It should be understood that the preceding is merely a detailed description of various embodiments of this invention and that numerous changes to the disclosed embodiment can be made in accordance with the disclosure herein without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention. The preceding description, therefore, is not meant to limit the scope of the invention. Rather, the scope of the invention is to be determined only by the appended claims and their equivalents.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1129897 | Owen, Jr. | Mar 1915 | A |
1911871 | Anderson | May 1933 | A |
2435811 | Waters | Feb 1948 | A |
2557501 | Fusay et al. | Jun 1951 | A |
2754554 | Mills | Jul 1956 | A |
2764789 | Zelenka | Oct 1956 | A |
2828953 | Hartmann | Apr 1958 | A |
2867866 | Steele | Jan 1959 | A |
3080624 | Weber, III | Mar 1963 | A |
3550853 | Gray | Dec 1970 | A |
3587968 | Balland et al. | Jun 1971 | A |
3633881 | Yurdin | Jan 1972 | A |
3748464 | Andeweg | Jul 1973 | A |
3749904 | Graff | Jul 1973 | A |
3761702 | Andeweg | Sep 1973 | A |
3790081 | Thornton et al. | Feb 1974 | A |
3890085 | Andeweg | Jun 1975 | A |
3923458 | Moran | Dec 1975 | A |
3948445 | Andeweg | Apr 1976 | A |
3990848 | Corris | Nov 1976 | A |
3993444 | Brown | Nov 1976 | A |
4035451 | Tringali | Jul 1977 | A |
4166087 | Cline et al. | Aug 1979 | A |
4276236 | Sullivan et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4294778 | DeLuca | Oct 1981 | A |
4323193 | Compton et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
4346059 | Spector | Aug 1982 | A |
4383951 | Palson | May 1983 | A |
4432938 | Meetze, Jr. | Feb 1984 | A |
4493011 | Spector | Jan 1985 | A |
4621768 | Lhoste et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4660764 | Joyaux et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4666638 | Baker et al. | May 1987 | A |
4695435 | Spector | Sep 1987 | A |
4707338 | Spector | Nov 1987 | A |
4739928 | O'Neil | Apr 1988 | A |
4743406 | Steiner et al. | May 1988 | A |
4857240 | Kearnes et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4866580 | Blackerby | Sep 1989 | A |
4913350 | Purzycki | Apr 1990 | A |
4931224 | Holzner, Sr. | Jun 1990 | A |
4968487 | Yamamoto et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
RE33864 | Steiner et al. | Mar 1992 | E |
5094025 | Daniels | Mar 1992 | A |
5095647 | Zobele et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5114625 | Gibson | May 1992 | A |
5126078 | Steiner et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5133042 | Pelonis | Jul 1992 | A |
5217696 | Wolverton et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5222186 | Schimanski et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5223182 | Steiner et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5342584 | Fritz et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5370829 | Kunze | Dec 1994 | A |
5376338 | Zlotnik | Dec 1994 | A |
5547616 | Dancs et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5647053 | Schroeder et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5651942 | Christensen | Jul 1997 | A |
5662835 | Collingwood | Sep 1997 | A |
D386974 | Wefler | Dec 1997 | S |
D393063 | Wefler | Mar 1998 | S |
5891400 | Ansari et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5909845 | Greatbatch et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5919423 | Requejo et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5970643 | Gawel, Jr. | Oct 1999 | A |
5980064 | Metroyanis | Nov 1999 | A |
6017139 | Lederer | Jan 2000 | A |
6104867 | Stathakis et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6106786 | Akahoshi | Aug 2000 | A |
6196706 | Cutts | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6241161 | Corbett | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6354710 | Nacouzi | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6361752 | Demarest et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6371450 | Davis et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6416242 | Kaufmann | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6454425 | Lin | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6484438 | Matsunaga et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6536160 | Morlier et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6555068 | Smith | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6567613 | Rymer | May 2003 | B2 |
6616308 | Jensen et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6619560 | Chun | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6648239 | Myny et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6766817 | da Silva | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6862403 | Pedrotti et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6899280 | Kotary et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6938883 | Adams et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6966665 | Limburg et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7007863 | Kotary et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7032831 | Duston et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
20020080601 | Meltzer | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020093834 | Yu et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020136542 | He et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020136866 | He et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030005620 | Ananth et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030007887 | Roumpos et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030053305 | Lin | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030146292 | Schramm et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040065749 | Kotary et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040074982 | Kotary et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040141315 | Sherburne | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040182949 | Duston et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040184969 | Kotary et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040246711 | Brenchley et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040257798 | Hart | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040262419 | Kotary et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040262420 | Hansen et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040265189 | Schwarz | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040265196 | Varanasi et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050053528 | Rymer | Mar 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
664685 | Nov 1995 | AU |
29907125 | Jul 1999 | DE |
054926 | Sep 2000 | DM |
0 882 459 | Dec 1998 | EP |
1 031 446 | Aug 2000 | EP |
1 270 021 | Jan 2003 | EP |
1 283 062 | Feb 2003 | EP |
1 283 062 | Dec 2003 | EP |
2 483 782 | Dec 1981 | FR |
2285579 | Jul 1995 | GB |
WO 9510352 | Apr 1995 | WO |
WO 0102025 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO 0123008 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO 0230220 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO 0231413 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO 03013618 | Feb 2003 | WO |
EP 1 392 368 | Oct 2003 | WO |
WO03086487 | Oct 2003 | WO |
WO 2004030708 | Apr 2004 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040184969 A1 | Sep 2004 | US |