The present invention pertains to diode, thermionic, tunneling, current limiting, current interruption, and other devices that are designed to have very small spacing between electrodes and in some cases also require thermal isolation between electrodes. The invention has particular utility in connection with thermo-tunneling generators and heat pumps, and can be applied to similar systems using thermionic and thermoelectric methods, and will be described in connection with such utility, although other utilities are also contemplated. These thermo-tunneling generators and heat pumps convert thermal energy into electrical energy and can operate in reverse to provide refrigeration. The invention also may be applied to any device that requires close, parallel spacing of two electrodes with a voltage applied or generated between them. The invention also may be applied to a switching device, such as a current limiter, over-temperature protector, relay, reset-able fuse, or circuit breaker, in which the electrical behavior is highly dependent on temperature or parameters that can affect temperature of an electrode such as current, voltage, or a nearby heat source. The invention also may be applied as a thermal switch whose thermal conduction may be varied or programmed.
The phenomenon of high-energy electron flow from one conductor (emitter) to another conductor (collector) has been used in many electronic devices and for a variety of purposes. For example, vacuum-tube diodes were implemented this way, and the physical phenomenon was called thermionic emission. Because of the limitations imposed by the relatively large physical spacing available, these diodes needed to operate at a very high temperature (greater than 1000 degrees Kelvin). The hot electrode needed to be very hot for the electrons to gain enough energy to travel the large distance to the collector and overcome the high quantum barrier. Nevertheless, the vacuum tube permitted electronic diodes and later amplifiers to be built. Over time, these devices were optimized, by using alkali metals, like cesium, or oxides to coat the electrodes, in an effort to reduce the operating temperature. Although the temperatures for thermionic generation are still much higher than room temperature, this method of power generation has utility for conversion of heat from combustion, from solar concentrators, or other sources to electricity.
Later, it was discovered that if the emitter and the collector were very close to each other, on the order of atomic distances like 2 to 20 nanometers, then the electrons could flow at much lower temperatures, even at room temperature. At this small spacing, the electron clouds of the atoms of the two electrodes are so close that hot electrons actually flow from the emitter cloud to the collector cloud without physical conduction. This type of current flow when the electron clouds are intersecting, but the electrodes are not physically touching, is called tunneling. The scanning tunneling microscope, for example, uses a pointed, conducting stylus that is brought very close to a conducting surface, and the atomic contours of this surface can be mapped out by plotting the electrical current flow as the stylus is scanned across the surface. U.S. Pat. No. 4,343,993 (Binnig, et al.) teaches such a method applied to scanning tunneling microscopy.
It has been known in the industry that if such atomic separations could be maintained over a large area (one square centimeter or even one square millimeter, for example), then a significant amount of heat could be converted to electricity by a single diode-like device and these devices would have utility as refrigerators or in recovering wasted heat energy from a variety of sources. See Efficiency of Refrigeration using Thermotunneling and Thermionic Emission in a Vacuum: Use of Nanometer Scale Design, by Y. Hishinuna, T. H. Geballe, B. Y. Moyzhes, and T. W. Kenny, Applied Physics Letters, Volume 78, No. 17, 23 Apr. 2001; Vacuum Thermionic Refrigeration with a Semiconductor Heterojunction Structure, by Y. Hishinuna, T. H. Geballe, B. Y. Moyzhes, Applied Physics Letters, Volume 81, No. 22, 25 Nov. 2002; and Measurements of Cooling by Room Temperature Thermionic Emission Across a Nanometer Gap, by Y. Hishinuma, T. H. Geballe, B. Y. Moyzhes, and T. W. Kenny, Journal of Applied Physics, Volume 94, No. 7, 1 Oct. 2003. The spacing between the electrodes must be small enough to allow the “hot” electrons (those electrons with energy above the Fermi level) to flow, but not so close as to allow normal conduction (flow of electrons at or below the Fermi level). In some cases, the vacuum gap might be used to minimize thermal conductance by lattice phonon vibration and the filtering of the hot electrons can take place in a semiconductor or thermoelectric material adjacent to the gap as exemplified in International PCT PCT/US07/77042 by the same inventor. There is a workable range of separation distance between 0.5 and 20 nanometers that allows thousands of watts per square centimeter of conversion from electricity to refrigeration. See Efficiency of Refrigeration using Thermotunneling and Thermionic Emission in a Vacuum: Use of Nanometer Scale Design, by Y. Hishinuna, T. H. Geballe, B. Y. Moyzhes, and T. W. Kenny, Applied Physics Letters, Volume 78, No. 17, 23 Apr. 2001. These references also suggest the advantage of a coating or monolayer of an alkali metal, or other material, on the emitting electrode in order to achieve a low work function in the transfer of electrons from one electrode to the other. This coating or monolayer further reduces the operating temperature and increases the efficiency of conversion for those configurations without a separate means for electron filtering.
Mahan showed that the theoretical efficiency of a thermionic refrigerator, using electrodes with a work function of 0.7 eV and a cold temperature of 500 K. is higher than 80% of Carnot efficiency. See Thermionic Refrigeration, By G. D. Mahan. Journal of Applied Physics, Volume 76, No. 7, 1 Oct. 1994. Also, see Multilayer Thermionic Refrigerator, By G. D. Mahan, J. A. Sofao and M. Bartkoiwak, Journal of Applied Physics, Volume 83, No. 9, 1 May 1998. By analogy a conversion efficiency of the electron tunneling process is expected to also be a high fraction of Carnot efficiency. Carnot efficiency presents an upper bound on the achievable efficiency of thermal energy conversion.
The maintenance of separation of the electrodes at atomic dimensions over a large area has been the single, most significant challenge in building devices that can remove heat from a conductor. The scanning tunneling microscope, for example, requires a special lab environment that is vibration free, and its operation is limited to an area of a few square nanometers. Measurements of cooling in a working apparatus have been limited to an area of a few square nanometers. See Measurements of Cooling by Room Temperature Thermionic Emission Across a Nanometer Gap, by Y. Hishinuma, T. H. Geballe, B. Y. Moyzhes, and T. W. Kenny, Journal of Applied Physics, Volume 94, No. 7, 1 Oct. 2003.
In my earlier, in PCT/US07/77042, I describe devices that achieve much larger amounts of energy conversion of milliwatts or fractions of watt using a pair of bimetal electrodes tested in a vacuum chamber. Devices described in my aforesaid patent application, have been used successfully to form nanometer gaps in a bell jar vacuum apparatus such that many materials on either side of the gap can be explored and measured. In addition, a fully packaged device with the successful gap-forming method of my aforesaid PCT/US07/77042 will be presented here, and this device can serve as a fully functional energy conversion product usable outside of a vacuum apparatus. See also my earlier filed PCT/US09/33660 which describes methods of forming gaps, achieving large amounts of heat transfer, and refined methods for packaging such a device.
Hence, there remains a need for a fully packaged device, which cost-effectively and efficiently converts heat energy into electrical energy in a package that is convenient to use for both the heat source as input and the electrical circuits needing power as output. Abundant sources of heat, including waste heat, could easily become sources of electricity. Examples where employing such devices would help the environment, save money, or both, include:
(1) Conversion of the sun's heat and light into electricity more cost effectively than photovoltaic devices currently used.
(2) Recovery of the heat generated by an internal combustion engine, like that used in automobile, back into useful motion. Some automobiles available today, called hybrid gas-electric automobiles, can use either electrical power or internal combustion to create motion. About 75% of the energy in gasoline is converted to waste heat in today's internal combustion engine. A tunneling conversion device could recover much of that heat energy from the engine of a hybrid automobile and put it into the battery for later use. U.S. Pat. No. 6,651,760 (Cox, et al.) teaches a method of converting the heat from a combustion chamber and storing or converting the energy to motion.
(3) Reducing the need for noxious gases to enter the atmosphere. The more energy-efficient hybrid automobile is a clear example where noxious exhaust gases escaping into the atmosphere can be reduced. A device that converts engine and exhaust heat of the hybrid engine and then stores or produces electricity in the hybrid battery would further increase the efficiency of the hybrid automobile and reduce the need to expel noxious gases. Coolants used in refrigeration are other examples of noxious gases that are necessary to remove heat, and tunneling conversion devices could reduce the need for emission of noxious gases.
(4) Recovery of heat energy at a time when it is available, then storing it as chemical energy in a battery, and then re-using it at a time when it is not available. Tunneling conversion devices could convert the sun's energy to electricity during the day and then store it in a battery. During the night, the stored battery power could be used to produce electricity.
(5) Power generation from geothermal energy. Heat exists in many places on the surface of the earth, and is virtually infinitely abundant deep inside the earth. An efficient tunneling conversion device could tap this supply of energy.
(6) Production of refrigeration by compact, silent and stationary solid state devices, where such a tunneling device could provide cooling for air conditioners or refrigeration to replace the need for bulky pneumatic machinery and compressors.
(7) Power generation from body heat. The human body generates about 100 watts of heat, and this heat can be converted to useful electrical power for handheld products like cell phones, cordless phones, music players, personal digital assistants, and flashlights. A thermal conversion device as presented in this disclosure can generate sufficient power to operate or charge the batteries for these handheld products from heat applied through partial contact with the body.
(8) Electrical power from burning fuel. A wood stove generates tens of thousands of watts of heat. Such a tunneling device could generate one or two kilowatts from that heat which is enough to power a typical home's electric appliances. Similar applications are possible by burning other fuels such as natural gas, coal, and others. Then homes in remote areas may not require connection to the power grid or noisy electrical generators to have modern conveniences.
(9) Electrical switching or current limiting in response to heat or temperature. Because these devices adjust the spacing of the nanometer gap based on temperature of an electrode, these devices may be deployed to open or limit current flow across into a circuit in response to a temperature that is reached by the current flow through the device or from the heat from another device, possibly one that is in danger of overheating due to a faulty event. The devices disclosed here operating as a relay or circuit breaker have the advantage of much smaller size due to the protection of the contact material within a vacuum enclosure, and also the ability to limit current by providing a nanometer gap that is not prone to arcing or other damage that is typical of open-air environments.
The challenge in bringing two parallel electrodes together within less than 20.0 nanometer separation gap and the proposed solution by this inventor and others is well described in my earlier filed PCT/US07/77042 and PCT/US09/33660, and in “Analysis of nanometer vacuum gap formation in thermo-tunneling devices”, by E T Enikov and T Makansi, Nanotechnology Journal, 2008. Here, we will focus on a fully packaged device with its own vacuum chamber that can be manufactured at a low cost for mass production and competitively priced relative to compressors. turbines, and electrical generators. This device contains within it the gap-forming bimetal electrode design described in my aforesaid PCT/US07/77042 and PCT/US09/33660.
The art of separating two conductors by about 1.0 to 20.0 nanometers over a large area has been advanced by the use of an array of feedback control systems that are very precise over these distances. A control system includes a feedback means for measuring the actual separation, comparing that to the desired separation, and then a moving means for bringing the elements either closer or further away in order to maintain the desired separation. The feedback means can measure the capacitance between the two electrodes, which increases as the separation is reduced. The moving means for these dimensions is, in the state of the art, an actuator that produces motion through piezoelectric, magnetostriction, or electrostriction phenomena. U.S. Pat. No. 6,720,704 (Tavkhelidze, et al.) and U.S. Pat. No. 7,253,549 (Tavkhelidze, et al.) and US Patent Application No. 2007/0033782 (Taliashvili et al.) describes such a design that includes shaping one surface using the other and then using feedback control systems to finalize the parallelism prior to use. Because of the elaborate processes involved in shaping one surface against the other and the use of multiple feedback control systems to maintain parallelism, this design approach is a challenge to manufacture at a low cost.
Other methods have been documented in U.S. Pat. No. 6,774,003 (Tavkhelidze, et al.), and U.S. Pat. No. 7,140,102 (Taliashvili, et al.), and US Patent Applications 2002/0170172 (Tavkhelidze, et al.), 2006/0038290 (Tavkhelidze, et al.), and 2001/0046749 (Tavkhelidze, et al.) that involve the insertion of a “sacrificial layer” between the electrodes during fabrication. The sacrificial layer is then evaporated to produce a gap between the electrodes that is close to the desired spacing of 1 to 20 nanometers. These three methods are either susceptible to post-fabrication fluctuations due to warping or thermal expansion differences between the electrodes, or require the array of actuators to compensate for these fluctuations, as described in US Patent Application Nos. 2005/0189871 (Tavkhelidze, et al.) and 2007/0056623 (Tavkhelidze, et al.).
Another method of achieving and maintaining the desired spacing over time is documented in U.S. Pat. No. 6,876,123 (Martinovsky, et al.) and U.S. Pat. No. 7,305,839 (Weaver) and U.S. Pat. No. 6,946,596 (Kucherov, et al.) in US Patent Application Nos. 2004/0050415, 2006/0192196 (Tavkhelidze, et al.), 2003/0042819 (Martinovsky, et al.), 2006/0207643 (Weaver et al.), 2007/0069357 (Weaver et al.), and 2008/0042163 (Weaver) through the use of dielectric spacers that hold the spacing of a flexible electrode much like the way poles hold up a tent. One disadvantage of these dielectric spacers is that they conduct heat from one electrode to the other, reducing the efficiency of the conversion process. Another disadvantage of this method is that the flexible electrodes can stretch or deform between the spacers over time in the presence of the large electrostatic forces and migrate slowly toward a spacing that permits conduction rather than tunneling or thermionic emission. Some of the challenges of forming a nanometer gap with these methods is summarized in “Thermotunneling Based Cooling Systems for High Efficiency Buildings”, by Marco Aimi, Mehmet Arik, James Bray, Thomas Gorczyca, Darryl Michael, and Stan Weaver, General Electric Global Research Center, DOE Report Identifier DE-FC26-04NT42324, 2007.
Another method for achieving a desired vacuum spacing between electrodes is reveled in US Patent Application Nos. 2004/0195934 (Tanielian), 2006/0162761 (Tanielian), 2007/0023077 (Tanielian), 2007/0137687 (Tanielian), and 2008/0155981 (Tanielian) wherein small voids are created at the interface of two bonded wafers. These voids are small enough to allow thermo-tunneling of electrons across a gap of a few nanometers. Although these gaps can support thermo-tunneling, unwanted thermal conduction takes place around the gaps, and the uniformity of the electrode spacing is difficult to control.
Yet another method for achieving a thermo-tunneling gap is by having the facing surfaces of two wafers be in contact, then using actuators to pull them apart by a few nanometers, as described in U.S. Patent Application 2006/0000226 (Weaver). Although this method can produce a thermo-tunneling gap, this method suffers from the cost of multiple actuators and the thermal conduction between wafers outside of the gap area.
The present disclosure provides improvements in the packaging, fabrication, and more specific implementation detail of the gap-forming designs described in my aforesaid PCT/US07/77042 and PCT/US09/33660. Two new methods for fabricating the chip pair and three new methods for enclosing the chip pairs into vacuum packages are disclosed here.
The two new chip fabrication methods address two limitations of the prior art. One new method allows for a deposited thermoelectric film to be annealed and polished at a wafer level prior to slicing of the wafer into individual chips. The other new method allows for single-crystal or polycrystalline wafers to be thinned down and polished and then used as thermoelectric layers. Many previous articles describe the surface roughness introduced by annealing a deposited thermoelectric film, such as “The thermoelectric properties and crystallography of Bi—Sb—Te—Se thin films grown by ion beam sputtering”, by H. Noro, K. Sato, and H. Kagechika, Journal of Applied Physics, 73(3) 1 Feb. 1993. In addition, many articles claim that single crystals offer higher thermoelectric performance than similar materials in polycrystalline or amorphous form, such as Thermal and electrical properties of Czochralski grown GeSi single crystals, by I. Yonenaga et. al. Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids 2001.
In addition, three new package design approaches are presented, each trading off cost and reliability uniquely. The first and preferred package design uses an individual vacuum tube for each gap-forming chip pair. The second package design Allows for multiple gap-forming chip pairs to be housed in a single vacuum cavity. The third package design creates the vacuum cavities on the same wafers that are used to fabricate the chip pairs.
A surface roughness of less than 1.0 nanometer can be achieved by any of several techniques known to the industry. Even though silicon and glass wafers are routinely polished to sub-nanometer roughness, the deposition of metal films creates additional roughness from nucleation and grain formation. This surface roughness can then be removed by (1) using a post-polishing process such as chemical mechanical polish called CMP, (2) cooling the substrate during deposition to prevent or minimize grain formation, or (3) pressing the surface against a known smooth surface such as that of a raw wafer. These and other polishing techniques are readily available in the industry for achieving less than 1.0 nanometers surface roughness on metals, semiconductors, and other materials. In all of these cases for achieving a smooth surface, the fabrication equipment and processing art readily available in the industry indicate a strong preference of smoothing the surface of an entire wafer vs. at a chip level. Methods disclosed here focus on wafer level smoothing integrated into the chip fabrication process.
Other systems, devices, features and advantages of the disclosed device and process will be or become apparent to one with skill in the art upon examination of the following drawings and detailed description. It is intended that all additional systems, devices, features, and advantages be included within this description, be within the scope of the present invention, and be protected by the accompanying claims.
Many aspects of the disclosed device and process can be better understood with reference to the attached drawings
a and
a and
a and 3b illustrate an example process for fabricating the chip pair of
a and 4b illustrate how the chip pairs of
a, 5b, and 5c illustrate three sample designs of a spring that could be added to the stack of
a-6c show how multiples of the devices of
a and 7b show another method for packaging many chip pairs as shown in
a and 8b show a method of fabricating the vacuum package on the same wafers that are used to fabricate the chip pairs. Instead of a separate part used for the glass wall as in
a and 9b show the thermoelectric performance, as measured by industry-standard figure of merit ZT, of devices fabricated per this invention.
Referring more specifically to the drawings in which like reference numerals refer to like elements throughout the several views, exemplary embodiments of the device and process of the present disclosure are illustrated in the several drawing figures.
In
In operation, the two electrodes in
The thermoelectric material 103 in the preferred embodiment is Bismuth Telluride Bi2Te3 or alloyed derivatives thereof. Without limitation, other or more complex thermoelectric materials may substitute for Bi2Te3. A feature of my invention is that the nanometer gap reduces the thermal conduction from the hot to the cold side, thereby making the performance of the device much less dependent on special materials as in the prior art. One example of a complex thermoelectric material is a super-lattice, which is a thermoelectric film comprised of multiple very thin films, the borders of which reduce the lattice thermal conduction. Other examples of complex thermoelectric materials include clathrates and chalcogenides. A comprehensive review of complex thermoelectric materials is provided in Complex Thermoelectric Materials, by G. Jeffrey Snyder and Eric S. Toberer, Nature Materials, Vol. 7, February 2008. Including those materials that have large or larger lattice thermal conductivity can enlarge the space of candidate materials for the invention device. These new material possibilities are important for many reasons. Elements in the periodic table with low lattice thermal conductivity are those with relatively large atomic weights. Semiconductors and metals with relatively large atomic weights tend have undesirable properties including: (1) toxicity, (2) radioactive, (3) high cost, (4) scarcity in either natural or man-made forms, and/or (5) inability to withstand higher temperatures. For example, toxicity is a major concern for traditional thermoelectric materials. Tellurium and similar elements like Antimony that are used in traditional devices are toxic. Silicon and Germanium are semiconductors that are non-toxic, plentiful, and inexpensive. Silicon and Germanium are not used in traditional thermoelectric devices, however, because their lattice thermal conductivities are several times higher than Tellurium and Antimony. Silicon and Germanium would work just fine in the embodiment of
Also, in order for thermoelectric devices to be used in power generation, it is preferred to operate them at high temperatures. The laws of thermodynamics state that the higher the temperature delta in an engine, the higher the efficiency of that engine. Very high temperatures, approaching 1000 Kelvin are required to maintain high efficiency power generators, and these temperatures are routinely used in power plant engines fueled by coal, gas, or nuclear energy. Thermoelectric devices need to sustain these same temperatures in order to compete with existing power plants. Bismuth, Tellurium, and Antimony have melting points of 544K, 723K, and 904K respectively. Because of these low melting points, the operational temperature of traditional thermoelectric devices has been limited to 500K. If the hot side of the device is 500K and the cold side is cooled to room temperature. or 300K, then the theoretical maximum efficiency is 40%, and that assumes an infinite ZT. However, silicon and germanium have melting points of 1683K and 1211K, and hence can sustain the temperatures of up to 1000K required to compete with existing power plants in thermodynamic efficiency.
For details of thermoelectric performance of silicon-germanium, see Thermal and electrical properties of Czochralski grown GeSi single crystals, by I. Yonenaga et. al. Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids 2001. For details about the surface behavior of these materials, see “Selective Epitaxial Growth of SiGe on a SOI Substrate by Using Ultra-High-Vacuum Chemical Vapor Deposition”, by H. Choi. J. Bae, D. Soh, and S. Hong, Journal of the Korean Physical Society, Vol. 48, No. 4, April 2006, pp. 648-652 and “Strain relaxation of SiGe islands on compliant oxide”, by H. Yin et. al. Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 91, number 12, 15 June 2002.
To activate the device for power generation as illustrated in
The central portion of innermost thermoelectric layers 103 of the invention illustrated in
Another advantage of the invention is the ability to operate over a range of temperatures. For traditional thermoelectric devices, Bi2Te3 and similar materials are used at low temperatures (lower lattice thermal conductivity, but lower melting points) and other materials like SiGe are used at higher temperatures (higher lattice thermal conductivity but higher melting points). The present invention allows a material such as SiGe to be used at the full range of temperatures because lattice thermal conduction is partially or totally eliminated by the vacuum gap illustrated in
Thermoelectric devices are generally reversible, meaning that a current flow through the device will produce refrigeration and, conversely, applying heat to one side will produce a voltage. The device of this invention is also reversible, and
In
When the device of
The device of
In the preferred configuration for power generation in
When no heat is applied at heat source 111, center contact exists between the two electrodes. As the heat source is turned on, some of this heat will flow through the center contact, increasing the temperature of the top electrode 113. The increased temperature causes the top electrode 113 to flatten out, ultimately creating a gap in the center as the top electrode then rests on the corner separators 108. As in the case for refrigeration, an equilibrium gap is formed. If a disturbance causes the gap to become larger than equilibrium, then the top electrode will cool down because of less heat traversing the gap, which causes the top electrode 113 to bend toward the bottom electrode, and re-establish the equilibrium. If a disturbance causes the gap to become smaller than equilibrium, then the increased heat conduction in the center will increase the temperature of the top electrode, causing it to bend away in the center until the equilibrium gap is re-established.
The device of
The devices illustrated in
The device of
Similarly, the heat source of the device of
Without limitation, the devices of
The device of
a shows one process for making the chip pair illustrated in
Substrate wafer 201 in
The gap facing surfaces of wafers 211 and 212 in
a shows a similar process flow for the case where a thermoelectric layer is deposited, annealed to become crystalline, and then polished to remove any roughness introduced during the annealing. In this process, the thermoelectric layer is formed on metal surfaces. Deposited Bismuth Telluride is known to become rough when annealed because poly-crystals form in multiple orientations, some protruding up from the surface. See “The thermoelectric properties and crystallography of Bi—Sb—Te—Se thin films grown by ion beam sputtering”, by H. Noro, K. Sato, and H. Kagechika, Journal of Applied Physics, 73(3) 1 Feb. 1993.
A silicon wafer is again used as a substrate for the process illustrated in
a and 4b illustrate how the chip pairs of
As mentioned, the chip pair of
a-6c show how an array 603 of the device of
The packaging methods in
A packaging method requiring even less parts handling is shown in
A chip pair was fabricated according to the dimensions and specifications of
Another pair of chips was fabricated according to the dimensions and specifications of
Because low voltage and high current characterize thermoelectric junctions, most thermoelectric modules internally connect the junctions in series. By having many series connected junctions, the available supply or load voltage can better match a sum of individual junction voltages. These series connections mean that the heat must flow with the current in the p-type junctions and against the current in the n-type junctions.
It should be emphasized that the above-described embodiments of the present device and process, particularly, and “preferred” embodiments, are merely possible examples of implementations and merely set forth for a clear understanding of the principles of the invention. Many different embodiments of the tunneling and self-positioning electrode device described herein may be designed and/or fabricated without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. All such modifications and variations are intended to be included herein within the scope of this disclosure and protected by the following claims. Therefore the scope of the invention is not intended to be limited except as indicated in the appended claims.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US09/69959 | 12/31/2009 | WO | 00 | 5/26/2011 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 61204212 | Jan 2009 | US |
Child | 13131535 | US |