The invention relates to a device for explosive forming.
A device of the above-mentioned class is described in WO 2006/128519. An ignition tube connects a detonation chamber inside a work piece with a gas supply, exhaust, and ignition device, wherein the ignition device is integrated in the ignition tube. The gas, oxyhydrogen in stoichiometric mixture with low oxygen excess, is ignited by the ignition tube arranged in the ignition device. The explosion of the gas develops a detonation wave, which forms the work piece and then wanes.
Experience with similar devices has shown that the ignition device and/or the ignition mechanism get damaged by the explosive forming.
It is therefore the object of the invention to improve a device of the previously-mentioned class such that a good detonation wave can develop, that the explosion procedure can progress in a more orderly manner, and that the ignition mechanism has a longer service life.
This objective is met by a device having the characteristics of claim 1 in accordance with the invention.
The impact breaker provided in the propagation path of the detonation wave reduces the energy of the detonation wave, which allows the device to be protected from high mechanical stress, and thus also from permanent damage. Surprisingly, the heavy reduction of the reflected shock wave already results in an extension of the service life of the ignition mechanism.
In a variation of the invention, the impact breaker can be arranged between the ignition location and the ignition chamber outlet. Thus, the detonation wave returning through the ignition chamber outlet can be diminished in its energy. The explosion propagating from the ignition location can sufficiently develop to form the work piece while passing through the forming tool, despite the impact breaker.
In a beneficial exemplary embodiment of the invention, the impact breaker can be arranged in closer proximity to the ignition location than to the ignition chamber outlet. This has the advantage that after passing through the impact breaker, an adequate stretch through the ignition chamber remains for the developing detonation wave to unfold, whereas the energy of the reflected detonation wave is diminished when reaching the impact breaker.
Advantageously, the impact breaker can be arranged directly at the ignition location. In this way, the ignition device can still be effectively protected against the reflected detonation wave. Nonetheless, the explosion can still be ignited there, and can propagate from there.
In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the impact breaker can be arranged on the side of the forming tool facing away from the ignition location. After passing through the forming tool, the energy of the detonation wave is dampened by the impact breaker. In this way, the well-developed explosion energy can be contained in the detonation wave until the detonation wave reaches the forming tool.
In a particular way, the impact breaker can also be arranged directly on the side of the forming tool facing away from the ignition location. The energy of the detonation wave passing through the forming tool can thus be dampened immediately after passing through the forming tool.
Advantageously, the impact breaker can be arranged closer to the end of the device located opposite the ignition location. The counter-effect on the forming tool from the detonation wave impacting the impact breaker could be diminished in this way.
It can also be conceivable that the impact breaker forms the end of the device located opposite the ignition location. The impact breaker could thus have the effect of a scattering element, which is impacted by the detonation wave.
It is suggested that the impact breaker can be arranged inside a support pipe, which can be mounted on the forming tool on the side of the forming tool facing away from the ignition location. The material of the support pipe could be different from that of the impact breaker and could simplify the construction of the impact breaker by being an insert.
Advantageously, the impact breaker and the support pipe in combination can be designed as an end piece. This end piece could connect directly to the forming tool thus closing the device on the side opposite of the ignition chamber. In this way, a longer run-out section for the detonation wave could develop.
It can also be of advantage for the impact breaker to have and/or to form a curved and/or reduced passage relative to the cross section of the ignition chamber or the cross section of the support pipe. These passage shapes can take away a significant amount of energy from the reflected detonation waves.
In a particular way, at least one impact breaker element can be provided, which is arranged at least partially spaced apart from the inner walls of the ignition chamber or the inner walls of the support pipe, thus forming a passage. By using the impact breaker element for forming a passage between the inner walls of the ignition chamber or the inner walls of the support pipe, the impact breaker element can be constructed in a simple, and thus in a stable manner.
In a beneficial embodiment, a plurality of passages forming between the impact breaker elements can be provided. By using several such impact breaker elements, the effect of the reflected detonation wave on the inner walls of the ignition chamber or the inner walls of the support pipe can be diminished and distributed to several elements. Furthermore, its energy can thus be reduced step-by-step, which in turn reduces the strain on the individual impact breaker elements.
In an advantageous exemplary embodiment, the flow resistance in a flow direction away from the ignition location can be lower than toward the ignition location, due to the impact breaker. As a result, the energy of the reflected detonation wave is reduced much more substantially than it is from the original explosion triggered by the ignition mechanism, whereas the ignition mechanism is still being protected if the impact breaker is arranged between the ignition location and the forming tool.
Furthermore, as a result of the impact breaker, the flow resistance in a flow direction away from the ignition location can be greater than toward the ignition location, and the impact breaker can be mounted on the side of the forming tool facing away from the ignition location. In this way, a significant amount of energy can be extracted from the shock wave prior to being reflected at the end of the device.
In a particular way, the impact breaker can be provided with at least one throttle check element. Thus, the propagating explosion can pass the impact breaker, whereas the reflected detonation wave is decelerated before the ignition mechanism by the throttle check element.
In a special embodiment, the impact breaker can be provided with at least one one-way element. Thus, the explosion can pass the impact breaker while the reflected detonation wave can be intercepted by the one-way element prior to reaching the ignition mechanism.
Beneficially, the surface of the impact breaker can be larger than the inner surface of the ignition chamber or the inner surface of the support pipe adjacent to the impact breaker. This can result in increased friction relative to the length of the impact breaker and thus to an improved energy reduction of the reflected detonation wave.
In a particularly advantageous embodiment, the cross section of the ignition chamber and/or the cross section of the support pipe can be enlarged in the region of the impact breaker. This creates more available construction space, especially for complex impact breakers.
Advantageously, the impact breaker can have at least one lateral branch diverging from a main passage. At the branching point, the detonation wave can split, which likewise causes the energy of the detonation wave to split, and can then be reflected and absorbed a number of times in the branching region.
It is useful for the at least one branch to be ramiform, at least in part. In this way, a plurality of branching points is created where the detonation wave can separate.
It is suggested that the at least one branch can be closed at its end, thus allowing the detonation wave to remain inside the impact breaker.
According to a variation of the invention, at least one branch can form a filling channel for fluid. Thus, the fluid used in a variation of explosive forming could be funneled into the device via the impact breaker, for example. Furthermore, the explosive agent could be introduced to the inside of the device via the filling channel.
It is feasible for the spreading space in the device to be connected to a spreading volume via the branch. In this way, the detonation wave could at least partially be channeled via the impact breaker into a spreading volume to subside.
It is possible for a filling device for fluid to be arranged on the side of the forming tool facing away from the ignition location. Thus, the structure of the device on the ignition location side could be simpler and have fewer connections.
It can be beneficial for the impact breaker to have a labyrinth structure. Due to the large surface, the long labyrinth path to be passed through, and the manifold diversion of the reflected detonation wave, an effective slowing down of said detonation wave can be achieved.
In a particular way, the impact breaker can be provided with at least one labyrinth element and/or a plurality of impact breaker elements forming a labyrinth structure. Depending on the situation, it can be more beneficial to form the labyrinth from one or from several labyrinth elements, or from a plurality of elements, which together form a labyrinth structure. The first option is recommend when not much construction space is available, for example, whereas with the second option, manufacture can be easier and cheaper.
In an advantageous exemplary embodiment, the passage can be somewhat meander-shaped. The meander shape with its multiple and sharp deviations can very effectively diminish the energy of the reflected detonation front.
Advantageously, the impact breaker can be provided with at least one disc-like impact breaker element with at least one passage through the disc. The disc can offer a large impact surface by way of its front face, with low production expenditure at the same time.
It can be beneficial for the impact breaker element to be designed as a cylindrical disc. In this way, it can be of stable construction while providing a long passage for reducing the energy of the reflected detonation front at the same time.
In a particular way, a plurality of impact breaker elements having dephased consecutive passages can be provided. Thus, the detonation wave is diverted several times, thus reducing its energy in a special way.
In an advantageous embodiment, the impact breaker element can be provided with a branched passage system. Branching points in particular can reduce the energy of the reflected detonation wave substantially.
In a beneficial exemplary embodiment, the impact breaker element can be of sponge-like, mesh-like, and/or clew-like design. These design forms can effectively diminish the detonation wave and have a sufficient service life.
Advantageously, at least one impact breaker element can be designed as a deflection wall. Deflection walls are a simple way to guide and control the detonation wave.
It can be of benefit if in its progression, the deflection wall is polygonal. In this manner, an additional reduction of the energy of the reflected detonation wave is achieved.
In a particular way, a plurality of impact breaker elements piled loosely in the manner of dry bulk goods can be provided. The effect of the loosely-layered arrangement is a good weakening of the reflected detonation wave, and in a simple way, the desired effect of the impact breaker can be determined by the number and type of impact breaker elements.
In an advantageous embodiment, a plurality of impact breaker elements spaced apart from one another can be arranged consecutively in a flow direction and be staggered transversely to the flow direction. Thus, the shape of the detonation front and the wave following thereupon and their effective deceleration can be taken into consideration in a special way.
In an advantageous exemplary embodiment, at least two consecutively arranged impact breaker elements can be arranged such that they overlap. The labyrinth-like structure with constricted passages thus formed is particularly well suited to decelerate the reflected detonation wave.
In a particular way, a plurality of impact breaker elements can be supported by an impact breaker carrier. This allows for simple installation and maintenance of the impact breaker elements.
In a special embodiment, the impact breaker can contain steel and/or copper beryllium (CuBe). Due to both their robustness and hardness, these materials are particularly well suited for impact breaker application.
Advantageously, the impact breaker can at least partially be arranged to be exchangeable. Thus, material fatigue and/or material wear and tear can be anticipated in a timely manner by easily performed maintenance.
In a particular way, the supply of the explosion agent can take place on the side of the impact breaker opposite from the ignition chamber outlet. In this way, the explosion agent supply can also be protected by the impact breaker.
In an alternative beneficial exemplary embodiment, the explosion agent supply can take place between the impact breaker and the ignition chamber outlet. Thus, the ignition mechanism can be supplied with a sufficient amount of explosion agent for ignition while promoting the development and growth the explosion after the impact breaker.
Exemplary embodiments of the invention will now be described in conjunction with the following drawings wherein like numerals represent like elements, and wherein:
a to 2j show several schematic embodiments of the impact breaker in
a, 3b show a detailed embodiment of the impact breaker in
a, 4b show an additional detailed embodiment of the impact breaker in
Between ignition location 6 and ignition chamber outlet 8, an impact breaker 9 is provided, which in this instance is located in ignition chamber 5. The system outlines of the impact breaker 9 are thereby indicated with dashed lines, and a doubly serrated element 10 symbolizes at least one impact breaker element 10 with the indication that the flow resistance in the direction to forming tool 2 is lower than in the direction from forming tool 2. In this exemplary embodiment, the impact breaker 9 is arranged in closer proximity to ignition location 6 than to ignition chamber outlet 8 and is provided with external walls 11, which merge with those of ignition chamber 5. By way of explosion agent feeders 7, the explosion agent can be channeled directly to ignition mechanism 4, and thus to ignition location 6 and/or to ignition chamber 5 on the side opposite from impact breaker 9. Flow direction 36 is indicated by an arrow, which at the same time describes the propagation path 37 of the detonation wave. A reflected detonation wave essentially expands in the device along propagation path 37 but contrariwise to flow direction 36.
In
In
In
In
In
In contrast to
In
h shows a clew-like impact breaker element 10, which causes the detonation wave to rebound manifoldly and to deflect, labyrinth-like, within itself In part, this clew-like impact breaker element 10 abuts to the external walls 11 of impact breaker 9, in part, it is spaced apart therefrom.
Basically,
i uses the symbolism of hydraulics to illustrate a one-way element 14 as an impact breaker element 10. This is to describe an impact breaker element 10 which allows the expanding explosion wave to pass while its reflection in the opposite flow direction is blocked. It does not necessarily follow that this one-way element 14 is a valve as known from the hydraulics field.
j shows a throttle check element 15 as an impact breaker element 10. It includes a one-way element 14 like in
In
In
In
These impact breaker elements 10 are immovably abutting on the external wall 11 of impact breaker 9. Commencing at ignition location 6, a passage 12 is at the disposal of the expanding explosion wave, said passage tapering conically toward the impact breaker elements 10 and extending thereafter in its reduced form. This reduced passage 12 continues after passing impact breaker elements 10. Transversely to flow direction 36, the cylindrical disc-shaped impact breaker elements 10 are provided with two bores 16 each, which are connected to one another via laterally applied recesses 17. All longitudinal bores starting at the front surfaces 13 terminate at the bores 16. In this way, passage 12 is first branched off in T-form in order to be re-united via a second T-form. The outlet of an impact breaker element 10 abuts on the inlet of the next impact breaker element 10.
In
In
In
In
Based on the forces in effect during deceleration of the detonation wave, impact breaker 9 and/or impact breaker elements 10 contain steel and/or copper beryllium (CuBe).
Impact breaker 9 could also be arranged on the side of forming tool 2 facing ignition location 6, or else a plurality of impact breakers 9 could be provided in the propagation path of the detonation wave. Furthermore, the orientation of the symbol for impact breaker elements 10 has been turned by 180 degrees relative to the illustration in
Main passage 30 terminates in a reflection surface 32, which in this exemplary embodiment is of hemispherical shape. However, reflection surface 32 can also be of a different shape, for example, calotte or pyramid-shaped, or such. In this exemplary embodiment, the reflection surface 32 is designed as part of a cover 31, which in this exemplary embodiment is removably mounted to support pipe 25 and, together with support pipe 25 and impact breaker 9, is designed as an end piece.
In this exemplary embodiment, impact breaker 9 can be provided without additional support devices at the end 38 of the support pipe, said support pipe being indicated by the outer dashed lines. In the instant exemplary embodiment, a reflection of the detonation wave at the smooth end 38 of device 29 can be avoided by deploying impact breaker 9. The detonation wave can be scattered directly on impact breaker 9 by impacting the plurality of reflection surfaces 32.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
102008006979.5 | Jan 2008 | DE | national |
This application is a National Entry Application of PCT/EP08/007,901, filed Sep. 19, 2008, which claims priority from German Patent Application Serial No. 102008006979.5, filed on Jan. 31, 2008, entitled “Vorrichtung far das Explosionsumformen” (Device For Explosive Forming), the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference for all purposes.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2008/007901 | 9/19/2008 | WO | 00 | 7/29/2010 |