1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to a device that will provide a uniform emission rate of a lure providing maximum attraction for flying insects for an extended period of time.
2. Description of the Related Art
Such lures are currently employed to detect and monitor for the presence of insect and other species that respond to lure-baited traps; e.g., the Mediterranean fruit fly (or medfly), melon fly, codling moth, mosquitoes, etc.
The information derived is used to determine where and when control measures—such as insecticide applications, sterile-insect release, mass trapping—are to be applied. The operation makes for a very efficient means of controlling or eradicating the targeted species from infested areas (especially large ones), and therefore is highly desirable from an agricultural and ecological standpoint. If pesticide is to be used, the procedure allows it to be applied only were needed and only as long as needed to effect control or eradication of the targeted species. Thus, the environment becomes less contaminated, and money is saved because less insecticide is used. Also noteworthy, the lure-baited traps have enabled eradication of such insect pests as the medfly, gypsy moth, boll weevil, melon fly from extensive areas of the United States.
Currently such traps, e.g., for the medfly, are manually examined every 2 to 3 weeks for medflies and for rebaiting of the lure, However, a new detection procedure has been advanced to replace the current one (patent application Ser. No. 10/097,629). With this procedure, the need for manual inspection of traps for detection of targeted insects can be extended to at least several months. However, a means that would likewise extend (without rebaiting of the lure) the uniform emission of the lure for a much longer period—e.g., for 2 or 3 month—was likewise needed. The lure dispenser described below has been devised to accomplish this task.
Obviously a variety of shapes of the container, wire, and wick opening would work well without departing from the basic ideas presented here. Thus, one could use a small bottle of appropriate size and shape to hold the desired amount of liquid and an appropriate opening to hold the wick partly immersed in lure and partly exposed to air. The wick opening can be square, or oblong to accommodate a flat dispenser; or the wick can be somewhat loose to allow air to enter the lure container (C) around the wick. Also, having the lure container horizontal (to change the lure level as little as possible as it is volatilized) will allow lure emission to be more uniform than if the container were a deep vertical one.
The wire-hanging arrangement of the lure dispenser from the trap top is most convenient. Removal and replacement of the dispenser from the Delta trap (See next paragraph) is easily done. With some traps, it may be more convenient to place the dispenser elsewhere in the trap; for example, on the bottom, without departing from the basic concepts being advanced.
In tests conducted with trimedlure, the lure dispenser—shown in FIG. 1—was placed in the Delta trap currently used by the USDA in California. In another Delta trap, the lure (MAGNET TRIMEDLURE, 70-0 Plug, 2 g active) used by USDA in California was placed (and replaced biweekly). (The inside surface of the Delta trap is coated with a sticky substance, which traps insects responding to the lure). The loss of trimedlure from each trap was determined every few days by weighing the lure dispensers. Losses of trimedlure from the two dispensers were consistently about the same for an extended period of time. Although loss of trimedlure depended on the temperature, what was important was that the losses of trimedlure from the two different dispensers (exposed under identical conditions) were consistently similar.
The extended-lure dispenser should be especially useful in mass trapping for insect control. When infestations are found, traps with the extended-lure dispensers can be deployed in the infested areas without the need to replenish the lure for the extended period of time. Further, when inspecting the lure dispenser, the need to replenish the lure is readily visible, especially if the lure is colored.
When problems with the foregoing arrangements are encountered, variations of the procedure may be used. The container may be constructed to allow more or less of the wick exposed to obtain the desired uniform emission rate of lure to provide maximum attraction for flying insects. The container may be constructed larger or smaller to hold more or less of liquid lure (or insecticide). An inert liquid, with a volatility about equal to that of the lure, may be added to the lure to reduce rate of lure evaporation. A solid but volatile lure (or insecticide) may be dissolved in a liquid carrier to allow its use in the lure dispenser. More than one dispenser, e.g., for different insects, may be used in a trap, or more than one lure may be used in a single dispenser, provided the lures do not interfere appreciably with each other's attraction.
Finally, while it may be desirable to replace the wick periodically, the device itself can be used indefinitely; i.e., it does not deteriorate, and it can be used repeatedly. With a different lure, the device can be washed and then reloaded with a new lure.
This invention was sponsored by the United States Department of Agriculture Agreement Number 58-0790-2-154.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1056535 | Grimes et al. | Mar 1913 | A |
1924379 | Reese | Aug 1933 | A |
2254948 | Kubalek | Sep 1941 | A |
2573972 | Reinhardt | Oct 1951 | A |
4310985 | Foster et al. | Jan 1982 | A |
4662103 | Cheng | May 1987 | A |
4745705 | Yamamoto et al. | May 1988 | A |
4802303 | Floyd, III | Feb 1989 | A |
4908977 | Foster | Mar 1990 | A |
5018299 | Peek et al. | May 1991 | A |
5501033 | Wefler | Mar 1996 | A |
5647164 | Yates | Jul 1997 | A |
6209252 | McGough | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6223465 | Soller et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6482365 | Soller | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6530172 | Lenz | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6532695 | Alvarado | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6543181 | Baker et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6585990 | Huang | Jul 2003 | B1 |
20030061757 | Askin | Apr 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
4-179426 | Jun 1992 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040055207 A1 | Mar 2004 | US |