Device for facilitating the removal of formwork

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6332297
  • Patent Number
    6,332,297
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, March 8, 2000
    24 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 25, 2001
    22 years ago
Abstract
The invention relates to a device for facilitating the removal of formwork for the end joint of a diaphragm wall panel, said formwork comprising a soleplate having two side edges. The device comprising:two substantially rectangular plates of substantially the same dimensions;spacer means secured to first longitudinal edges of each of said plates to hold them substantially parallel to each other at a spacing h;filler means for filling the volume defined by said plates, the spacer means, and a plane orthogonal to said plates located at a distance d from the second longitudinal edges of the plates; andtemporary fixing means for fixing said plates to said soleplate.
Description




The present invention relates to a device for facilitating the removal of formwork for the end joint of a diaphragm wall panel.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




When it is desired to make a diaphragm wall, i.e. a wall made of concrete in a trench dug in the ground, this operation is performed in successive segments, each corresponding to a panel of the diaphragm wall, and the set of panels constitutes the wall.




To provide mechanical continuity between wall panels in a zone where two panels meet, the end of each panel is given a special “joint” shape enabling the end of each panel to be received in the end of the preceding panel. This shape corresponding to the joints is defined at the end of the trench that is being dug by inserting formwork of a shape that forms the joint of the panel that is being made.




With reference initially to

FIGS. 1A and 1B

, there follows a description of the prior art technique for making the various panels of a diaphragm wall. Initially, a first portion of trench


10


is dug corresponding to a first panel, and end joint formwork


12


is placed at the end


10




a


of the portion of trench. In conventional manner, the formwork


12


comprises a soleplate


14


and a box


16


defining the shape of the joint, and preferably also comprises a structure


18


enabling a connection element


20


to be held and protected between sealing elements that can be provided in the diaphragm wall.




As shown in

FIG. 1A

, the concrete constituting the panel


22


passes round the ends of the soleplate


14


of the formwork


12


in side zones referenced


24


. Some of this concrete can even end up against the outside face


14




a


of the soleplate


14


, as shown at


26


.




In the following step, as shown in

FIG. 1B

, a second portion of trench


28


is dug to constitute the following panel of the diaphragm wall. During this digging, the bucket of the mechanical digger can be used to scrape the outside wall


14




a


of the soleplate


14


so as to remove the corresponding portion of concrete. However, experience shows that there always remains some of the concrete that has passed round, as referenced


24


.




Prior to filling the second portion of trench


28


, it is of course necessary to extract the formwork


12


. This operation is difficult because of the adhesion between the concrete and both with the box


18


and with the inside face


14




b


of the soleplate


14


. In addition, this operation is made even more difficult because of the presence of concrete that has passed round in the zones


24


.




To solve that problem, proposals have already been made in French patent 2 613 395 to coat the face of the formwork that faces into the concrete in a thin material that can be abandoned in the trench so as to avoid adhesion between the concrete and the formwork, and to extract the formwork substantially vertically.




Proposals have also been made to solve the same problem in French patent 2 647 828 by applying a shock to the joint on its side remote from the concrete by means of a tool that is guided by the joint itself.




Another known technique for removing the formwork


12


consists in using removal “hooks” which consist, as explained in greater detail below, essentially in two hook-shaped pieces which are engaged on the edges of the soleplate of the formwork and whose active portions are engaged against the inside face of the soleplate at its edges.

FIG. 1C

shows the general shape of such removal hooks


30


and


32


when in place.





FIG. 1D

shows a removal hook


30


. It comprises one end


31


for connection to a machine, an arm


33


for passing round the side edge of the soleplate


14


, and a flange


30




a


for insertion between the inside face


14




b


of the soleplate and the concrete in order to unstick the formwork from the concrete.




Because of the presence of concrete in the zones


24


where it passes round the edges of the soleplate, it is very difficult to engage the removal hooks


30


and


32


. The hooks need to clear themselves a passage round the edge zones


24


over a width of 2 cm to 3 cm (referenced e) corresponding to the width of the removal hooks, and to do so over a length that may exceed 5 cm (referenced e′) corresponding to how far the concrete has gone past in the zones


24


. This operation puts very large stresses on the removal hooks and can lead to them breaking or at least to wearing out very prematurely. In addition, jamming phenomena make this operation difficult and thus lengthy, thereby giving rise to non-negligible cost in the construction of the diaphragm wall.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




An object of the present invention is to provide a device for facilitating the removal of formwork for the end joint of a diaphragm wall panel, which device makes it possible to use removal hooks under conditions that are greatly improved thus making it possible to limit the wear on the removal hooks and to increase the speed with which the removal operation can be performed.




To achieve this object, the invention provides a device for facilitating removal of formwork for the end joint of a panel of a diaphragm wall, said formwork comprising a soleplate having an outside face, an inside face carrying a box, and two side edges, said box leaving two empty side zones on the inside face of the soleplate in the vicinity of said edges, the device comprising:




two substantially rectangular plates of substantially the same dimensions;




spacer means secured to a first longitudinal edge of each of said plates to hold them substantially parallel to each other at a spacing h that is substantially equal to the thickness of the soleplate of the formwork;




filler means for filling the volume defined by said plates, by the spacer means, and by a plane orthogonal to said plates at a distance d from the other longitudinal edges of the plates, whereby the space between said plates that does not include filler means is suitable for receiving a side portion of the soleplate, said filler means being made of a low strength material; and




temporary fixing means for fixing said plates on said soleplate.




It will be understood that by means of this disposition, the removal hooks can be engaged vertically on either side of the soleplate in register with those portions of the devices for facilitating removal that are constituted at least in part by the filler means whose mechanical strength is relatively low. Thus, the removal hooks can be pushed into the zones that have no concrete going round the edges as constituted at least in part by the relatively weak filler material.




In addition, the very presence of devices for facilitating removal limits the size of the zones occupied by the concrete that has gone round the edges.




In a first embodiment said plates and said spacer means are constituted by a metal sheet shaped to comprise two flanges interconnected by a web, and said filler means are constituted by a piece in the form of a rectangular parallelepiped disposed between the flanges of the metal sheet and against the web, said filler means being made of a plastics material that is unsuitable for being impregnated by concrete.




In a second embodiment said plates are made of wood, said spacer means are constituted by a wooden batten fixed between said plates along the first longitudinal edges thereof, and the filler means are constituted by a piece in the form of a rectangular parallelepiped disposed between said plates and against said batten, said piece being made of a plastics material that is unsuitable for being impregnated by concrete.




In a third embodiment said plates are made of wood, said spacer means are constituted by strips of wooden batten fixed between said plates along the first longitudinal edges thereof, said strips of batten leaving empty gaps between one another in the longitudinal direction of the edges of said plates, and the filler means are constituted by pieces substantially in the form of rectangular parallelepipeds of a plastics material that is unsuitable for being impregnated by concrete, said pieces being disposed in the gaps between the strips of batten.




In a preferred embodiment, the filler means are constituted by polystyrene. This material has the advantage of mechanical strength that is low compared to the removal hooks while preventing concrete filling the zone between the two plates forming the device for facilitating removal.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




Other characteristics and advantages of the invention will appear better on reading the following description of various embodiments of the invention given by way of non-limiting example. The description refers to the accompanying figures, in which:





FIGS. 1A

to


1


C, described above, illustrate a prior art method of making a diaphragm wall panel;





FIG. 1D

, described above, shows a conventional type of removal hook;





FIG. 2

is a horizontal section view showing the principle on which the devices for facilitating removal are based;





FIGS. 3A

to


3


C show how the removal hooks act on formwork fitted with devices for facilitating removal;





FIG. 4A

shows a first embodiment of the device for facilitating removal;





FIG. 4B

shows how the

FIG. 4A

device for facilitating removal is put into place on formwork;





FIG. 5A

is a perspective view of a second embodiment of the device for facilitating removal;





FIG. 5B

shows how the

FIG. 5A

device for facilitating removal is put into place on formwork;





FIG. 6A

is a perspective view of a third embodiment of the device for facilitating removal;





FIG. 6B

shows the

FIG. 6A

device for facilitating removal in its vertical direction; and





FIGS. 7 and 8

are perspective views of two preferred means for fixing a device for facilitating removal to the soleplate of formwork.











DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED




With reference initially to

FIG. 2

, there follows a description of the principle on which the device for facilitating removal is based. In this figure, there can be seen formwork


12


having its soleplate


14


put into place in the trench


10


in which the wall panel


22


has already been made. The invention consists in fixing on each edge


34


,


36


of the soleplate


14


a respective structure given general reference


40


and referred to below as a device for facilitating removal. This structure


40


thus projects from either side of the soleplate


14


into the trench


16


and is constituted by a set of materials of mechanical strength that is smaller than that of the removal hooks and which, by its very presence, limits the extent to which concrete can move past in the corresponding zone. This structure is described below in greater detail with reference to

FIGS. 4

to


6


.




With reference now to

FIGS. 3A

to


3


C there follows a brief description of how the devices


40


for facilitating removal are used. Before putting the formwork


12


in the trench, a device


40


for facilitating removal is fixed to each of the edges


34


and


36


of the soleplate


14


and then the formwork fitted in this way is put into place in the trench. After the first trench portion


10


has been filled with concrete and the second trench portion


28


has been dug with concrete being scraped off the outside face of the soleplate, there still remain two zones


24


′ of concrete that has passed round the soleplate, which zones are smaller in size than the corresponding zones in the prior art because of the presence of the devices


40


. In addition, it will be understood that the devices


40


constitute two zones that are weaker than the concrete and that exist between the soleplate


14


and the zone


24


′ containing concrete that has gone past the soleplate. It is then possible to present the removal hooks


30


and


32


at the top end of the formwork in such a manner that the arms


33


thereof are in register with the devices


40


and the active portions


30




a


and


32




a


thereof are placed to face the inside face


14




b


of the soleplate. The machine on which the removal hooks


30


and


32


are mounted can be used to push them down, breaking their way through the devices


40


with the active portions


30




a


and


32




a


of the removal hooks causing the soleplate


14


and its box


16


to come progressively away from the concrete


22


filling the trench portion. Once the removal hooks reach the bottom portion of the formwork it can easily be extracted.




In

FIG. 2

, it can be seen that if the width of the soleplate


16


is referenced L, and the width of the trench


10


is referenced L


1


, then the dimensions of the devices


40


for facilitating removal must be such that once fixed on the soleplate, the overall width of the soleplate together with the devices, referenced L


2


, is less than the width L


1


of the trench.




With reference now to

FIGS. 4A and 4B

, there follows a description of a first embodiment of the device for facilitating removal. The device


40


is constituted by stamped sheet metal


50


having two substantially parallel and rectangular flanges


52


and


54


interconnected by a web


55


. The length of the sheet metal is substantially equal to the height of the soleplate. The web


55


spaces the flanges


52


and


54


apart by a distance h which is very slightly greater than the thickness of the soleplate. In the volume defined between the two flanges


52


and


54


there is fixed a piece


56


that is substantially in the form of a rectangular parallelepiped that is pressed against the web


55


. This piece


56


is made of a plastics material that is unsuitable for becoming impregnated with concrete, e.g. polystyrene. Between the flanges


52


and


54


, there remains an empty volume


58


of length d within which the side edge portion of the soleplate is received when the device


40


is fixed thereon. The shaped metal sheet


50


is preferably about {fraction (4/10)}


ths


to {fraction (6/10)}


ths


of a millimeter thick. As shown more clearly in

FIG. 4B

, it will be understood that the zone occupied by the piece


56


constitutes a zone of weakness into which it is easy to cause the removal hook to penetrate. Naturally, the width f of the piece


56


must be greater than the width e of the arms


33


of the removal hooks.




With reference now to

FIGS. 5A and 5B

, there follows a description of a second embodiment of the device


40


for facilitating removal. This device is constituted by two planks of wood


60


and


62


of substantially rectangular shape whose first two edges


60




a


and


62




a


are interconnected by a wooden batten


64


acting as a spacer to hold the two planks


60


and


62


substantially parallel and spaced apart by a distance h corresponding to the thickness of the soleplate. A piece


66


substantially in the form of a rectangular parallelepiped is disposed between the two planks


60


and


62


and against the batten


64


. This piece


66


of width f is made of a plastics material that is unsuitable for being impregnated by concrete, e.g. polystyrene. An empty space


68


of length d thus remains between the planks


62


and


60


and suitable for receiving the side edge of the soleplate


14


. As can be seen clearly more clearly in

FIG. 5B

, the volume constituted by the pieces


66


that are preferably made of polystyrene constitutes zones of weakness on either side of the soleplate


14


into which the removal hooks can easily be made to penetrate.





FIGS. 6A and 6B

show a third embodiment of the device


40


for facilitating removal. In this embodiment, the device


40


is again constituted by two planks of wood


70


and


72


that are substantially rectangular and that are interconnected by lengths of wooden batten such as


74


which thus form spacers for holding the planks


70


and


72


apart at a spacing h. Gaps such as


76


are left between the strips of batten


74


fixed close to a first edge of the planks


70


and


72


, and these gaps are fitted with pieces


78


made of a weak material such as polystyrene. As shown better in

FIG. 6B

, this provides alternating strips of batten


74


and pieces


78


of polystyrene, for example, extending parallel to the first edge of the planks


70


and


72


. This assembly overall constitutes a zone of weakness of width f into which the removal hooks can penetrate easily. The zone


79


which remains empty between the planks


70


and


72


over a distance d serves to receive a side portion of the soleplate


4


.





FIGS. 7 and 8

show two possible ways in which devices


40


for facilitating removal can be fixed to the soleplate


14


.




In

FIG. 7

, the device is fixed by ties in the form of annealed wires


80


passing through holes


82


made through the soleplate


14


close to its edge


36


.




In

FIG. 8

, the device


40


is fixed to the edge


36


of the soleplate


14


by means of metal staples


84


placed astride the device


40


and having their ends


86


welded to the inside and outside faces of the soleplate


14


.



Claims
  • 1. In combination, a formwork for making an end joint of a panel of a diaphragm wall, and two devices for facilitating removal of said formwork,said formwork comprising a soleplate having an outside face, an inside face carrying a box, and two side edges, said box being disposed such that an empty side zone is formed on the inside face of the soleplate adjacent each of said two edges, said soleplate having a defined thickness extending between said outside face and said inside face, each of the devices comprising: two substantially rectangular plates of substantially the same dimensions, and having first and second longitudinal edges, spacer means secured to said first longitudinal edge of each of said plates to hold said plates substantially parallel to each other at a distance h that is substantially equal to the thickness of the soleplate, whereby said plates, said spacer and a plane substantially perpendicular to said plates define a first internal volume, and said plates and said plane define a second open volume, filler means disposed within said first volume and made of a material of relatively low strength, said second volume that does not include said filler means being constructed and arranged to receive a side portion of the soleplate, and means for temporarily fixing said plates on a side portion of said soleplate.
  • 2. The combination according to claim 1, wherein said plates and said spacer means comprise a metal sheet shaped to comprise two flanges interconnected by a web, and wherein said filler means comprises a piece in the form of a rectangular parallelepiped disposed between the flanges of the metal sheet and against the web, said filler means being made of a plastics material that is unsuitable for being impregnated by concrete.
  • 3. The combination according to claim 1, wherein said plates are made of wood, wherein said spacer means comprises a wooden batten fixed between said plates along said first longitudinal edges thereof, and wherein said filler means comprises a piece in the form of a rectangular parallelepiped disposed between said plates and against said batten, said piece being made of a plastics material that is unsuitable for being impregnated by concrete.
  • 4. The combination according to claim 1, wherein said plates are made of wood, wherein said spacer means are constituted by strips of wooden batten fixed between said plates along said first longitudinal edges thereof, said strips of batten leaving empty gaps between one another in the longitudinal direction of the edges of said plates, and wherein said filler means are constituted by pieces substantially in the form of rectangular parallelepipeds of a plastics material that is unsuitable for being impregnated by concrete, said pieces being disposed in the gaps between the strips of batten.
  • 5. The combination according to claim 1, wherein said filler means comprises polystyrene.
  • 6. The combination according to claim 1, wherein said temporary fixing means comprises wires surrounding said plates and passing through holes formed through the soleplate.
  • 7. The combination according to claim 1, wherein said temporary fixing means comprises metal staples placed astride said plates and having free ends welded to the inside and outside faces of the soleplate.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
99 03428 Mar 1999 FR
US Referenced Citations (4)
Number Name Date Kind
2911702 Clyncke Nov 1959
3978626 Weinar Sep 1976
4112646 Clelland Sep 1978
4333290 Koberstein Jun 1982
Foreign Referenced Citations (5)
Number Date Country
679790 Apr 1992 CH
299166637-U1 Mar 2000 DE
0462010 Dec 1991 EP
2315803 Feb 1998 GB
61257530 Nov 1986 JP