Not applicable
The present invention relates to a shoe that is easily constructed and provides greater comfort to the wearer without affecting the fit or style of the shoe. The invention has particularly in connection with high-heeled shoes and will be described in connection with such utility, although the invention also has utility in connection with low heel footwear products as well.
Conventional high-heeled shoes have a reputation for being extremely uncomfortable. There is survey information indicating that as many as 20% of the users of such shoes experience foot pain related to the shoes immediately, and the majority of users experience such pain after as little as four hours of use.
In order to understand the prior art and the present invention, it is necessary to understand the anatomy of the foot and the basics of shoe construction. To that end,
The heel 20 (also known as the tarsus) includes the talus 21 and the calcaneus 22 bones. The rear lower surface of the calcaneus 22 has a slight protuberance 23 known as the calcaneal tuberosity.
Referring to
The bones of the foot also include the navicular 41, the cuneiform 42, the metatarsals 45 and the phalanges, or toes, with the big toe 31 visible in
Also depicted in
According to conventional shoe construction methods, the last is the form around which the shoe is constructed. During manufacture, the lower surface of the last sits on the upper surface of insole board, and the shoe upper is then shaped around the last and attached to the insole board. Optimally, the lower surface of the last and the upper surface of the insole board fit together smoothly in order to properly manufacture shoes. If there is any convexity on the lower surface of the last or the upper surface of the insole board respectively, a corresponding concavity must be present in the insole board or last respectively. To be assured of a quality shoe construction, any such convexity and corresponding concavity must be carefully aligned during shoe manufacture, thereby introducing added complexity and/or quality control issues to shoe manufacture.
As will be appreciated, a conventional high-heeled shoe such as shown in
Numerous suggestions have been made for improving the comfort of high-heeled shoes, including suggestions in my prior patents and publications. For example, in a February 1990 article in Current Podiatric Medicine, pp. 29-32, I described a high-heeled shoe design in which the portion of the shoe under the heel does not form a continuous ramp down the arch to the ball of the foot, but rather the portion underlying the heel is relatively parallel to the ground. The design used a rigid plastic molded midsole which was cupped to receive the heel and angled to bring the heel into a plane more parallel with the floor. In addition, a metatarsal pad was incorporated into the molded midsole.
In U.S. Pat. No. 5,373,650, I described a rigid or semirigid orthotic under the heel and extending forward, with arch support, to a point behind the metatarsal heads of the foot. The heel in this device is supported parallel to the ground or tilted slightly backwards.
In U.S. Pat. No. 5,782,015, I described a high-heeled shoe design in which the heel is positioned more parallel or slightly downwardly inclined angle relative to the shank plane and which has an arch support that supports the head of the navicular in approximately the same plane as the wearer's heel bones. My PCT Publication WO98/14083, published Apr. 9, 1998, describes a rigid molded device comprising a heel cup and an anatomically shaped arch appliance.
Numerous examples of designs by others intended to improve comfort of high-heeled shoes exist in the prior art. U.S. Pat. Nos. 1,864,999, 1,907,997, 4,317,293, 4,631,841, 4,686,993, 4,932,141 and 6,412,198 each describes shoe inserts or orthotics intended to improve comfort of a high-heeled shoe. Several involve arch supports. Some are rigid; others suggest cushioning as a means to improve comfort. The prior art inserts and orthotics typically are relatively bulky and can affect a shoe's fit if added by the wearer after manufacture. Other prior art proposals to improve wearer comfort require that each last used to manufacture the shoe be modified to change the shape of the shoe itself.
These prior art constructions improve comfort by supporting or cushioning parts of the foot and/or altering the foot angles to reduce sliding forward and/or to alter the percentage of the wearer's weight borne by different parts of the foot. Their teachings suggest, among other things, placing the heel on a more level plane to shift the weight backward onto the heel, supporting the arch, angling the toes upward and/or cushioning surfaces on which the largest percentage of weight is borne.
The foregoing discussion of the prior art derives primarily from my earlier U.S. Pat. No. 7,322,132 in which I provide a thin flexible shoe insert which readily can be adapted to any style shoe and which can be incorporated into a shoe without requiring modifications to a shoe last or adding manufacturing complexity. The insert has two slightly raised areas under the heel and the metatarsals. Although the insert has two only slightly raised areas, it significantly increases wearer comfort even in very high heels. The insert does not require that the heel be repositioned to a plane parallel with the floor as is the case in some of the prior art. Other than in the two slightly raised areas, the insert can be extremely thin, thereby minimizing any effect on fit of the shoe and eliminating any adverse effect on the style or appearance of the shoe. Alternatively, the thin flexible insert can be placed in the shoe by the wearer. See also my U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,595,346, 7,814,688 and 7,962,986.
While high heel shoes in accordance with my aforesaid U.S.'132, '346, '688 and '986 patents enjoy considerable commercial success and are available from a number of manufacturers in numerous countries, I have found that changing the shape of the heel region to better accommodate the plantar surface of the calcaneal tuberosity, comfort and ankle stability is unexpectedly and significantly improved for both high-heeled shoes, as well as low heel shoes and flats. More particular, the present invention provides a device for insertion into heeled shoes and the corresponding method of constructing shoes using the device. The device comprises a rear region positioned to underlie the calcaneal tuberosity the wearer. The rear region is shaped to accommodate the plantar surface of the calcaneal tuberosities and includes first and second essentially ellipsoid shaped depressions to accommodate the calcaneal tuberosity of the wearer. The first depression, on the medial/inside of the device, i.e., under the medial tuberosity, is the larger of the two depressions, and is slightly deeper than the second depression on the lateral/outside of the device. Typically the depression on the medial/inside is 2-5 times larger than the depression on the lateral/outside preferably 2-4 times larger, more preferably 2½-3 times larger, most preferably about 2.7 times larger in plan, and the base level of the depression under the lateral tuberosity is slightly higher, e.g., about 0.1-3 mm higher, more preferably 0.1-2 mm higher, most preferably about 0.3 mm higher over the base level of the depression under the medial tuberosity to accommodate the calcaneal tuberosity of the wearer. The toeward portions of the first and second depressions gradually rise to crescent shaped apices lying under the area forward of the tuberosity of the calcaneus. The device also includes a forward region positioned to underlie at least a portion of the shafts of the metatarsals, the upper surface of said forward region having a portion which gradually rises to an apex positioned to underlie the shafts of the second and third metatarsals. In the preferred embodiment, the device has a bridging or middle region which connects the forward and rear regions, the device is flexible and the upper surface of the device is smoothly contoured between all regions. A feature and advantage of the device of the present invention is that the device may universally be applied to conventional heeled shoes without the need to otherwise modify the shoes or the shoe last. A shoe may be constructed with the device according to the present invention by incorporating the device into the shoe during the manufacturing process or the device may be applied post-manufacture by the wearer.
As used herein “heeled shoes” shall include high heeled shoes, low heeled shoes and flats. The present invention provides a device which improves comfort and is easily installed in heeled shoes. For purposes of this invention, it is to be understood that heeled shoes include all footwear having a heel which is about one inch or higher. The benefits of the invention are achieved when a device is positioned in a shoe to underlie the metatarsal shafts and calcaneus of the wearer. Typically, the device is positioned on the insole board or sock liner of a heeled shoe. Preferably, the device is sufficiently flexible so that it readily conforms to the upper surface of the insole board or sock liner on which it is positioned. The device may be formed of any materials known to those of ordinary skill in the art that can be molded or shaped and that will produce a device flexible under normal conditions of use of a shoe, while retaining sufficient dimensional stability to retain the benefit of the invention.
In the preferred embodiment, the device is shaped to underlie at least (i) the portion of the heel extending from the edge of the tuberosity of the calcaneus to the portion of the heel that is immediately forward of the tuberosity of the calcaneus, and (ii) the area under the second and third metatarsal shafts. The device may extend beyond these areas and may be shaped to conform to the shape of the sock liner or insole board. Optimally, the device is narrower than the sock liner when it is to be positioned under the sock liner. This narrower size allows the edge of the sock liner to be adhered to the insole board along the edges of the device of the invention. Depending on the style of the shoes this narrower configuration may be particularly desirable.
The device has two distinct areas: a first distinct heel area that underlies the calcaneal tuberosities of the wearer, and which has two depressed areas shaped generally to accommodate respectively the lateral and medial tuberosities of the wearer's calcaneal anatomy. The depressed areas rise from their respective forward edges of the tuberosity of the calcaneus to a crescent-shaped apices underlying the calcaneus in the area forward of the tuberosity of the calcaneus of the wearer's foot. The device also includes a second distinct raised area located within a shoe to underlie the metatarsal shafts of the wearer's foot, with its apex under or between the second and third metatarsal shafts. The first and second raised areas are joined by a bridging or middle region. For clarity, it is to be understood that references to narrow and wide mean the side-to-side dimensions of the shoe or device while references to raised, lowered, thinness, depth or height mean the vertical dimensions of the device.
Referring in particular to
A third raised area 140 is located in the forward region of the device which is canted to the medial side, and is positioned to underlie the metatarsal shafts 47 of the wearer's foot. Optimally, the apex of the third raised area 140 is located under or between the second and third metatarsal shafts. The third raised area 140 comprises a generally rounded or ellipsoid shape that rises to an apex in the toeward direction of the metatarsal heads. The forward raised area 140 preferably has a thinner aspect located towards the heel end and a wider aspect located towards the toeward end. Since the device includes a lop-sided section under the heel region, and the toeward region is canted to the medial side, the device is left/right shoe specific, the left and right pieces being mirror images of one another.
The apices of raised areas 130, 135 and 140 are 2 to 8 mm higher relative to the bottom surface of the device and, preferably 2 to 6 mm higher, more preferably 2.5 to 4.5 mm, most preferably about 3.8 mm higher relative to the bottom surface of the device measured immediately forward of the forward raised area under the metatarsal shafts and immediately rearward of the raised areas under the calcaneus. In a particularly preferred embodiment each apex 130, 135 and 140 is approximately 3.3 mm high for a US size 1 women's shoe, approximately 3.9 mm higher for a US size 6 woman's shoe, and approximately 5.2 mm for a US size 16 women's shoe high relative to the bottom surface of the device (or their equivalents in other, e.g. English, European and Japanese shoe size scales) having a heel height of 1 to 5 inches. A bridge area 160 separates depressed areas 136 and 138, and is also depressed relative to the upper surface of the device surrounding the depressed areas 136 and 138. In the preferred embodiment the apices 130, 135 and 140 are of similar or the same height. Preferably, each apex 130, 135 and 140 is higher for higher heeled shoes and lower for lower heeled shoes. Also, each apex 130, 135 and 140 preferably is lower for smaller sized shoes and higher for larger sized shoes. The size of raised areas 130, 135 and 140 also changes somewhat with shoe size with the size of the area increasing with increasing length and/or width. Typically, the size of the raised areas both in terms of height and area is scaled to the shoe size with normal rules of scaling applying as the length and width of the shoes increases with increasing size. However, it has been found that a small range of sizes can use an identical device without significant loss of the improved comfort associated with the device. The critical factor on the comfort achieved with the device of the invention appears to be the location of the two raised regions—under the calcaneus but forward of the tuberosity of the calcaneus, and under the middle metatarsals but rearward of the heads of the metatarsals, and the size and location of the depressed areas under the calcaneus tuberosity.
Heel size from individual to individual typically varies far less than other aspects of foot dimensions. Accordingly, the depressed areas 136 and 138 under the calcaneus tuberosity may be made essentially the same for all toot sizes provided the area under the medial tuberosity 138 is far larger than under the lateral tuberosity 136, and the base level of the depressed area 136 under the lateral tuberosity is somewhat higher over the base level of the depressed area 137 under the medial tuberosity. The proximal and the distal ends of the device, i.e., underlying the back of the heel and forward of raised area 140 are thin relative to the raised areas. Preferably these proximal and distal ends have a depth that results in their being flush with the upper surface of the shoe upper where it wraps around the upper surface of the insole board. Preferably the ends are also shaped to conform somewhat to the area extending between the edges of the upper that lie on the surface of the insole board. The thickness of these ends of the device typically will be from 0.2 to 1 mm thick.
The bridging or middle section or area of the device between the first raised areas 130, 135 and the second raised area 140 is also preferably thin relative to the raised areas. The thickness of this area is in part dictated by issues of structural integrity during the manufacturing process for the shoe. With stronger materials this area can, and ideally should be, no more than a millimeter thick. In general, this bridging or middle section or area must be thinner than the raised areas 130, 135 and 140, and preferably is no more than about 4 millimeters thick, more preferably about 2 mm thick for a US size 6 women's shoe and about 2½ mm for a US size 10 women's shoe (or their equivalents in other size scales). This thinner bridging or middle region allows the device to more easily conform to the shape of the insole. The minimum width of this bridging or middle region is also dictated by manufacturing considerations with the optimal minimum width being that which will maintain the geometry of the forward and rear regions relative to each other. The maximum width is that which will not interfere with the appearance of the shoe. Preferably this bridging or middle region is narrower than the sock liner 54 and, like the ends of the device, the bridging or middle region sits flush with the upper surface of the upper that wraps around the insole board and generally conforms to the shape of the area created by the edges of the upper on the insole board.
It should be noted that, contrary to the teachings of the prior art, rather than providing a raised area for supporting the arch of the wearer's foot in the device of the present invention, at least a portion of the bridging or middle region underlying the arch is thinner than the apices of the first and second raised areas 130, 140. That is to say, where a traditional arch support normally would be located in the shoe at least a portion of the area underlying the arch of the foot is hollowed or lower than adjacent areas leaving the arch unsupported in part.
Preferably, the upper surface of the device is smoothly contoured, with no sharp transitions or edges that could contribute to discomfort. Specifically, the transition between the apices of the raised areas and the surrounding areas of the device are filleted and smooth.
As described above, the invention contemplates a single flexible device into which both raised areas are incorporated. As shown in
The device 100 preferably is positioned in shoe 50 during the manufacturing process. Accordingly, this invention also provides a method of constructing a heeled shoe comprising: (a) assembling an upper, insole board and sole; (b) mounting above the insole board a flexible device comprising (i) a rear region positioned with its depressed areas to underlie the calcaneus tuberosity of the wearer; (ii) a forward region positioned to underlie at least a portion of the shafts of the metatarsals, the upper surface of said forward region having a portion which gradually rises to an apex positioned to underlie the shafts of the second and third metatarsals from a position behind the heads of metatarsals; (iii) a bridging or middle region which connects said forward and rear regions; and (iv) the upper surface of said device transitioning smoothly between all regions; and (c) affixing a sock liner to the insole board and to the device. The order in which these steps are done is the choice of the manufacturer. In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the device 100 is positioned on the insole board 53 of the shoe 50, and then a sock liner 54 is adhered to the top of the insole board and the device 100. It is also contemplated that the device 100 may be installed post-manufacture or post-sale in certain embodiments, e.g., by being placed on the insole board 53 or sock liner 54 post-manufacture. The device 100 may be attached to the insole board 53 and the sock liner 54 through means such as glue, pressure-sensitive adhesive (PSA), hook and loop fasteners, or mechanical fasteners such as nails or staples. In general, any means that will cause the raised areas of the device to remain in position may be used to position the device in the shoe. Device 100 also need not be separate from the sock liner but may be integral with the sock liner.
In order to facilitate proper positioning of the device, the device may be provided with markings or structures that orient the device. These markings may be arrows or the device itself may be configured with points which serve to orient the device.
The device of the present invention provides unexpected advantages over the prior art. For example, although the device is only a few millimeters thick, the device causes the weight borne by the foot to be significantly shifted towards the heel and off the ball of the foot. As a result, the device reduces toe pain and general lower back pain associated with the wearing of heeled shoes. Thus, foot pain, endemic with the use of heeled shoes including specifically high-heeled shoes, is reduced or eliminated using the instant device. The device also improves ankle stability.
In addition, this device does not require any change in the lasts used to manufacture conventional shoes; rather, the device can simply be placed into the conventionally constructed shoe either by the manufacturer or by the wearer. Nor does this device significantly affect the fit of the shoe as it does not intrude substantially into the shoe and thereby diminish the space available for the foot.
This application is a continuation of our U.S. application Ser. No. 15/819,951, filed Nov. 21, 2017, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,477,915, which application in turn is continuation-in-part (CIP) of our prior U.S. application Ser. No. 15/057,925, filed Mar. 1, 2016, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,390,587, wanted Aug. 27, 2019.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
73924 | Pickett | Jan 1868 | A |
975576 | Sexton | Nov 1910 | A |
1055768 | Levee et al. | Mar 1913 | A |
1137092 | Sharp | Apr 1915 | A |
1210066 | Hara | Dec 1916 | A |
1287810 | Wojteck | Dec 1918 | A |
1387952 | Steinbrecher | Aug 1921 | A |
1550715 | Stout | Jun 1923 | A |
1480234 | Wedd | Jan 1924 | A |
1503764 | Nickerson | Aug 1924 | A |
1544625 | Austin | Jul 1925 | A |
1557312 | Lelyveld | Oct 1925 | A |
1728243 | Marshalek | Sep 1929 | A |
1760300 | Donovan | May 1930 | A |
1777855 | Oblak | Oct 1930 | A |
1819539 | Bringardner | Aug 1931 | A |
RE18237 | Messler | Oct 1931 | E |
1827044 | Simon | Oct 1931 | A |
1828086 | Tweedie | Oct 1931 | A |
1847287 | White | Mar 1932 | A |
1847973 | Morton | Mar 1932 | A |
1864999 | Gluckman | Jun 1932 | A |
1907997 | Nickerson | May 1933 | A |
1957695 | Chiapetta | May 1934 | A |
1960418 | Schaller | May 1934 | A |
1992081 | Madinger | Feb 1935 | A |
2008207 | Greenberg | Jul 1935 | A |
2029409 | Brand | Feb 1936 | A |
2034463 | Dvlinsky | Mar 1936 | A |
2046732 | Fein | Jul 1936 | A |
2055072 | Everston | Sep 1936 | A |
2081474 | Burns | May 1937 | A |
2088263 | Grouven | Jul 1937 | A |
2092910 | Daniels | Sep 1937 | A |
2097759 | Ehrlich | Nov 1937 | A |
2119807 | Farley | Jun 1938 | A |
2246944 | Larkin | Jan 1939 | A |
2156532 | Greider | May 1939 | A |
2161565 | Freda | Jun 1939 | A |
2221202 | Ratcliff | Nov 1940 | A |
2252936 | Leydecker | Aug 1941 | A |
2255100 | Brady | Sep 1941 | A |
2304384 | Stemmons | Dec 1942 | A |
2346279 | Stritter | Apr 1944 | A |
2379000 | Gould | Jun 1945 | A |
D143642 | Bouthillette | Jan 1946 | S |
2413534 | Watson | Dec 1946 | A |
2423622 | Samblanet | Jul 1947 | A |
2424107 | McCahan | Jul 1947 | A |
2460493 | Diamant | Feb 1949 | A |
2505032 | De Voos | Apr 1950 | A |
2588317 | Schwartz | Jun 1951 | A |
2628440 | Leydecker | Feb 1953 | A |
2658288 | Scholl | Nov 1953 | A |
2814133 | Herbst | Nov 1957 | A |
2821032 | Helfet | Jan 1958 | A |
2826834 | Ratcliff | Mar 1958 | A |
2828555 | Ledos | Apr 1958 | A |
2863231 | Jones | Dec 1958 | A |
2897611 | Schaller | Aug 1959 | A |
2909854 | Edelstein | Oct 1959 | A |
2917849 | Scholl | Dec 1959 | A |
2928193 | Kristan | Mar 1960 | A |
2961780 | McManus | Nov 1960 | A |
3058240 | Osgood | Oct 1962 | A |
3068872 | Brody | Dec 1962 | A |
3084695 | O'Donnell | Apr 1963 | A |
3099267 | Cherniak | Jul 1963 | A |
3165841 | Rollman | Jan 1965 | A |
3187069 | Pincus et al. | Jun 1965 | A |
3233348 | Gilkerson | Feb 1966 | A |
3309797 | Poitras | Mar 1967 | A |
3333353 | Garcia | Aug 1967 | A |
3416245 | Ferreira | Dec 1968 | A |
3449844 | Spence | Jun 1969 | A |
3530489 | Appleton | Sep 1970 | A |
3591882 | Pearsall | Jul 1971 | A |
3638336 | Silverman | Feb 1972 | A |
3643353 | Weight | Feb 1972 | A |
3646692 | Glogg | Mar 1972 | A |
3680162 | Glickman | Aug 1972 | A |
3730169 | Fiber | May 1973 | A |
3781231 | Janssen et al. | Dec 1973 | A |
3832793 | Siskin | Sep 1974 | A |
3842519 | Lapidus | Oct 1974 | A |
3847720 | Laberinti | Nov 1974 | A |
3935044 | Daly | Jan 1976 | A |
3942206 | Diamant | Mar 1976 | A |
4003146 | Meier et al. | Jan 1977 | A |
4048732 | Stix | Sep 1977 | A |
4054706 | Shapiro | Oct 1977 | A |
4055699 | Hsiung | Oct 1977 | A |
D246551 | Hansjosten et al. | Dec 1977 | S |
4073024 | Stix | Feb 1978 | A |
4084333 | Del Vecchio | Apr 1978 | A |
4101704 | Hiles | Jul 1978 | A |
4124946 | Tomlin | Nov 1978 | A |
4128950 | Bowerman et al. | Dec 1978 | A |
4137654 | Hlavac | Feb 1979 | A |
4168585 | Gleichner | Sep 1979 | A |
4187621 | Cohen | Feb 1980 | A |
4188736 | Keller | Feb 1980 | A |
4235026 | Plagenhoff | Nov 1980 | A |
4237626 | Brown | Dec 1980 | A |
4240214 | Sigle et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
4266350 | Laux | May 1981 | A |
4268980 | Gudas | May 1981 | A |
4272899 | Brooks | Jun 1981 | A |
4285144 | Power | Aug 1981 | A |
4291428 | Anzani | Sep 1981 | A |
4292263 | Hanrahan et al. | Sep 1981 | A |
4296053 | Doerer et al. | Oct 1981 | A |
4302892 | Adamik | Dec 1981 | A |
4307521 | Inohara et al. | Dec 1981 | A |
4316335 | Giese et al. | Feb 1982 | A |
4317293 | Sigle et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
4320588 | Sottolana | Mar 1982 | A |
4345387 | Daswick | Aug 1982 | A |
4346205 | Hiles | Aug 1982 | A |
4346525 | Larsen et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4360027 | Friedlander et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
4364189 | Bates | Dec 1982 | A |
4367599 | Diamant | Jan 1983 | A |
4372059 | Ambrose | Feb 1983 | A |
4377041 | Alchermes | Mar 1983 | A |
4378642 | Light et al. | Apr 1983 | A |
4398357 | Batra | Aug 1983 | A |
4408402 | Looney | Oct 1983 | A |
4418483 | Fujita et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4435910 | Marc | Mar 1984 | A |
4451949 | Long | Jun 1984 | A |
4455340 | Okina | Jun 1984 | A |
4472890 | Gilbert | Sep 1984 | A |
4490928 | Kawashima | Jan 1985 | A |
4494321 | Lawlor | Jan 1985 | A |
4506462 | Cavanagh | Mar 1985 | A |
4510700 | Brown | Apr 1985 | A |
4510702 | Ehrlich, Jr. | Apr 1985 | A |
4513518 | Jalbert et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4515851 | Johnson | May 1985 | A |
4517981 | Santopietro et al. | May 1985 | A |
4527345 | Lopez Lopez | Jul 1985 | A |
4541184 | Leighton | Sep 1985 | A |
4541186 | Mulvihill | Sep 1985 | A |
4557060 | Kawashima | Dec 1985 | A |
4564966 | Chen | Jan 1986 | A |
4581187 | Sullivan et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4586273 | Chapnick | May 1986 | A |
4608988 | Dananberg | Sep 1986 | A |
4627177 | Meyers | Dec 1986 | A |
4627178 | Sullivan et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4631841 | Hickey | Dec 1986 | A |
D288621 | Surpuriya et al. | Mar 1987 | S |
4670996 | Dill | Jun 1987 | A |
4674204 | Sullivan et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4677766 | Gudas | Jul 1987 | A |
4682425 | Simmons | Jul 1987 | A |
4686993 | Grumbine | Aug 1987 | A |
4689898 | Fahey | Sep 1987 | A |
4769926 | Meyers | Sep 1988 | A |
4777739 | Hiles | Oct 1988 | A |
4782605 | Chapnick | Nov 1988 | A |
4798010 | Sugiyama | Jan 1989 | A |
4835884 | Bianchini et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
D302764 | Peoples et al. | Aug 1989 | S |
4852275 | Bianchini et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4854057 | Misevich et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4866860 | Blissett et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4876805 | Peoples | Oct 1989 | A |
4910866 | Sullivan et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4932141 | Hones | Jun 1990 | A |
4955148 | Padilla | Sep 1990 | A |
4972612 | Prukop et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
5014706 | Philipp | May 1991 | A |
RE33648 | Brown | Jul 1991 | E |
5063692 | Suginaka | Nov 1991 | A |
D329129 | Brown | Sep 1992 | S |
5146697 | Weiss | Sep 1992 | A |
5174052 | Schoenhaus et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
D353710 | Brazzell | Dec 1994 | S |
5373650 | Dananberg et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
D362956 | Martin et al. | Oct 1995 | S |
5509218 | Arcan et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5551173 | Chambers | Sep 1996 | A |
5584130 | Perron | Dec 1996 | A |
5625965 | Blissett et al. | May 1997 | A |
5632104 | Zohar | May 1997 | A |
5685094 | Lin | Nov 1997 | A |
5782015 | Dananberg | Jul 1998 | A |
5787608 | Greenawalt | Aug 1998 | A |
5787610 | Brooks | Aug 1998 | A |
6000147 | Kellerman | Dec 1999 | A |
6041524 | Brooks | Mar 2000 | A |
6131311 | Brown et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6253469 | Atlani et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6282816 | Rosendahl | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6412198 | Rothbart | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6510626 | Greenawalt | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6604301 | Manoli, II et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6889452 | Ailey et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
D513358 | Amado et al. | Jan 2006 | S |
7013583 | Greene et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7124520 | Galbraith et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7200955 | Foxen | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7264604 | Schuren et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7266913 | Axt et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7322132 | Dananberg | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7380352 | Seiter | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7484319 | Cheskin et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7526882 | Rhenter | May 2009 | B2 |
7594346 | Dananberg | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7814688 | Dananberg | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7962986 | Dananberg | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8166674 | Dananberg | May 2012 | B2 |
8925218 | Anderson | Jan 2015 | B2 |
9055781 | Tzeng | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9460557 | Tran et al. | Oct 2016 | B1 |
20040118017 | Dalton et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20050060909 | Kerns et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20070033834 | Cheskin | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20090307925 | Pfister | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100146816 | Cappaert | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100287795 | Van Niekerk | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110185590 | Nishiwaki | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20120255199 | Tzeng | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130104423 | Hatfield | May 2013 | A1 |
20130205620 | Hsu | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130247418 | Nurse | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20160015120 | Denison | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20170007160 | Latterman | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170027277 | Anthony et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170251749 | Hughes et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20180092429 | Hughes et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2770419 | Apr 2006 | CA |
199601035 | Feb 1997 | CL |
1233943 | Nov 1999 | CN |
2688103 | Mar 2005 | CN |
6930029 | Apr 2014 | CO |
22803 | Jun 1883 | DE |
660551 | Mar 1938 | DE |
875466 | Jul 1949 | DE |
397602 | May 1994 | DE |
427556 | May 1991 | EP |
591909 | Oct 1993 | EP |
1163646 | Sep 1958 | FR |
1207258 | Feb 1960 | FR |
1413280 | Apr 1965 | FR |
2015914 | Apr 1970 | FR |
2272618 | Mar 1975 | FR |
2309169 | May 1975 | FR |
2427801 | Jun 1978 | FR |
2506132 | May 1981 | FR |
2522482 | Jan 1982 | FR |
217833 | Jun 1924 | GB |
452492 | Nov 1934 | GB |
1243575 | Aug 1971 | GB |
1564195 | Apr 1980 | GB |
2057964 | Apr 1981 | GB |
2088776 | Jun 1982 | GB |
209 953 | Feb 1995 | HU |
10-234417 | Aug 1998 | JP |
2001-523981 | Nov 2001 | JP |
201519811 | Jun 2015 | TW |
WO 9107152 | May 1991 | WO |
WO9200714 | Jan 1992 | WO |
WO 9814083 | Apr 1998 | WO |
WO9818358 | May 1998 | WO |
WO 2004012548 | Feb 2004 | WO |
WO 2004093584 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO2006043923 | Apr 2006 | WO |
WO 2010085485 | Jul 2010 | WO |
WO2011017174 | Feb 2011 | WO |
WO2016178638 | Nov 2015 | WO |
WO2016185400 | Nov 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“A Manual of Lower Extremities Orthotics”, ed. Miles H. Anderson, pp. 109-111, 1972. |
“Anthropometry of the Foot and Lower Leg of U.S. Army Soldiers: Fort Jackson, SC—1985” NATICK/TR-92/028. Natick, Ma: U.S. Army Natick Research, Development, and Engineering Center (ADA261405), 1992 (360 pgs). |
“Common Foot Disorders: Diagnosis and Management”, ed. Donald Neale, pp. 44-47, 52-54, 65-66, 192-194, 1981. |
“Lower Limb Ortbotics: 1981 Revision”, Prosthetics and Orthotics Department, New York University, Post-Graduate Medical School, pp. 172-179, copyright 1981. |
“Mechanical Foot Therapy”, Philip R. Bachman (The Leicht Press) pp. 292-295, 1946. |
“New Styling for High-Heeled Comfort: The Classic Pump Redefined for Fashion Wear” Dananberg, Current Podiatric Medicine, 1990, pp. 29-32. |
“Podopediatries—The Care of Childrens Feet” by Herman R. Tax, B.S., Pod.D., Copyright 1947 (“Manual”), Pgs. Forward and 101-105 and 108-110. |
“Shear Madness” Footwear News, vol. 53, No. 15 (2 pgs). |
Chilean Office Action (w/machine translation) issued in application No. 201801535, dated Oct. 10, 2019 (24 pgs). |
Chilean Search Report (w/machine translation) issued in application No. 201801535, dated Oct. 10, 2019 (7 pgs). |
Chinese Search Report/Office Action (and translation) issued in related application No. 201086002797.9, dated Feb. 8, 2014 (40 pgs). |
Colombia Office Action (w/translation) issued in application No. NC2018/0006210, dated May 21, 2019 (18 pgs). |
EP Communication dated Dec. 23, 2008 in EP Application No. 04 795 016.7, 5 pgs. |
European Search Report issued in application No. 16892908.1, dated Dec. 20, 2018 (10 pgs). |
European Search Report issued in related application No. 10150628.5, dated Feb. 21, 2014 (5 pgs). |
Herman R. Tax, D.P.M., “Podopediatrics”, 1980, pp. 189, 221-242. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for related International Patent Application Serial No. PCT/US2016/033964,dated Sep. 4, 2018, 7 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in application No. PCT/US2004/033795, dated Apr. 26, 2007 (8 pgs). |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in corresponding, application No. PCT/US2011/042044, dated Jan. 8, 2013 (8 pgs). |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability, PCT/US2010/043578, dated Feb. 7, 2012 (11 pgs). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in application No. PCT/US04/10925, dated Mar. 8, 2005 (7 pgs). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in application No. PCT/US2004/033795, dated May 27, 2005 (16 pgs). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in application No. PCT/US16/33964, dated Aug. 31, 2016 (10 pgs). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in application No. PCT/US18/62086, dated Feb. 11, 2019 (12 pgs). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2010/043578, dated Sep. 24, 2010 (15 pgs). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2011/042044, dated Feb. 7, 2012 (9 pgs). |
Japanese Official Action (and tranSlation) issued in related application No. 2012-523655, dated Jul. 31, 2014 (5 pgs). |
Korean Office Action issued in application No. 10-2007-7010683, dated Sep. 29, 2011 (9 pgs). |
Korean Office Action issued in application No. 10-2010-7022406, dated Oct. 19, 2011 (11 pgs). |
Merton L. Root, D.P.M.; William P. Orion, D.P.M.; and John H. Weed, D.P.M.; normal and abnormal Function of the Foot, 1977, Clinical Biomechanics, vol. II, pp. 355-367. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/964,532, dated Sep. 11, 2007 (9 pgs). |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/489,328, dated Aug. 30, 2010 (9 pgs). |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/489,328, dated Jul. 1, 2010 (16 pgs). |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/827,444, dated Dec. 14, 2010 (11 pgs). |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/827,444, dated Feb. 17, 2011 (7 pgs). |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 29/196,782, dated May 16, 2005 (6 pgs). |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 29/196,783, dated May 16, 2005 (6 pgs). |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 29/196,784, dated May 16, 2005 (6 pgs). |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 29/227,099, dated Jun. 19, 2006 (16 pgs). |
Office Action dated Apr. 28, 2010 issued in related Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2007/004383 (2 pgs). |
Office Action dated Feb. 15, 2008 issued in related Chinese Patent Application No. 200480044477.4 (7 pgs, with translation). |
Office Action dated Nov. 1, 2010 issued in related Chinese Patent Application No. 200910150976.6 (7 pgs, with translation). |
Office Action dated Nov. 21, 2008 issued in related Chinese Patent Application No. 200480044477.4 (6 pgs, with translation). |
Office Action dated Nov. 4, 2009 issued in related Japanese Patent Application No. 2006-509840 (7 pgs, with translation). |
Office Action dated Oct. 2, 2007 issued in related EPO Patent Application No. 04 737 224.8 (3 pgs). |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/421,403, dated Dec. 14, 2004 (6 pgs). |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/964,532, dated Apr. 13, 2007 (22 pgs). |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/489,328, dated May 20, 2010 (15 pgs). |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/057,925, dated Apr. 12, 2017 (5 pgs). |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/057,925, dated Apr. 20, 2018 (18 pgs). |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/057,925, dated Feb. 9, 2017 (15 pgs). |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/057,925, dated Jan. 11, 2019 (20 pgs). |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/057,925, dated May 1, 2019, 2019 (28 pgs). |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/057,925, dated May 19, 2017 (15 pgs). |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/057,925, dated Nov. 29, 2017 (5 pgs). |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/057,925, dated Nov. 21, 2016 (29 pgs). |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/057,925, dated Sep. 22, 2016 (17 pgs). |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/356,256, dated Apr. 26, 2017 (32 pgs). |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/356,256, dated Feb. 23, 2017 (19 pgs). |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/819,951, dated Apr. 16, 2019 2019 (29 pgs). |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/819,951, dated Jan. 31, 2019 (23 pgs). |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/819,951, dated Jul. 26, 2018 (34 pgs). |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/819,951, dated May 16, 2018 (43 pgs). |
Office Action issued in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 15/057,925 dated Jan. 10, 2018, 25 pgs. |
Official Action received in Applicant's related European Patent Application Serial No. 04737224.8, dated Sep. 13, 2010 (5 pgs). |
Official Action received in Applicant's related Japanese Patent Application Serial No. 2006-509840, dated Jun. 22, 2010 (5 pgs). |
Official Action received in Applicant's related Japanese Patent Application Serial No. 2007-536664, dated Aug. 10, 2010 (6 pgs). |
Plastic Insole from Standing Ovation TM Shoes by HBN Shoe, LLC,1997;U.S. Appl. No. 29/196,783 (the “Artifact Sheet indicating an item has been filed which cannot be scanned” (dated Mar. 8, 2004) is provided in lieu of the original Plastic Insole) (1 pg). |
South Africa Acceptance of Complete Specification issued in application No. 2218/03211, dated May 23, 2019 (1 pg). |
Taiwanese Official Action (and translation) issued in related application No. 99125770, dated Mar. 27, 2015 (37 pgs). |
Taiwanese Official Action (and translation) issued in related application No. 99125770, dated May 21, 2015 (22 pgs). |
Chilean Search Report. (w/machine translation) issued in application No. 201801535, dated Feb. 12, 2020 (20 pgs). |
Chinese Official Action (w/machine translation) issued in application No. 201680002814.6, dated Mar. 3, 2020 (16 pgs). |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/057,925, filed Mar. 1, 2016. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/356,256, filed Nov. 18, 2016. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/819,951, filed Nov. 21, 2017. |
Taiwanese Official Action issued in related Taiwan Patent Application Serial No. 106106619, dated Jun. 8, 2020 with Machine Translation (5 pages). |
Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in related PCT International Patent Application Serial No. PCT/US2018/062086, dated Jun. 4, 2020 (9 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200085138 A1 | Mar 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15819951 | Nov 2017 | US |
Child | 16686963 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15057925 | Mar 2016 | US |
Child | 15819951 | US |