The invention relates to a device for imparting a torsional force onto a wire which can be a welding wire.
Wires consumables are used in many industrial applications: from surface treatments like metallization to joining of metal parts in welding. In the coming years, wires will be increasingly utilized in the very important and continuously improving field of 3D printers.
In many industrial applications, which are nowadays seeing important investments in automatic and robotic systems, a maximized productivity is essential and bulk containers with large quantities of consumable are preferred to smaller spools because they allow to reduce the interruptions and minimize the spool replacement downtime. A parameter commonly accepted in the welding industry to measure the changeover downtime teaches that it normally takes an average of 15 minutes to replace an empty 15 kg spool with a full new one, and the spool changeover downtime can be therefore quantified in one minute lost to changeover for one kg of wire. Based on this calculation, it appears obvious that a large pack or drum containing 1200 Kgs of product is equivalent to as much as 20 hours of changeover downtime saving. These 20 hours can be better used to actively produce instead of having to continuously interrupt the production because of spool changes: this advantage translates into a significant reduction of production costs and improves the efficiency of the manufacturing processes.
It must be added that every undesired production stop can lead to additional complications and disadvantages in terms of consistency of quality, because in certain welding processes like the production of fuel tanks or long welds on trailers or railway cars, it is generally not acceptable to stop in the middle of a weld bead, which must instead preferably be uninterrupted from start-to-end of the welding process; in certain metallization or welding applications, an intermediate unwanted interruption can cause a total rejection and scrapping of the part altogether.
The concentration of packs containing large quantities of wire consumable in specific centralized areas (called “wire farms”), at a safe distance from dangerous sparks generated by the welding arc and where handling by forklifts is facilitated, is now made possible by the wire feed systems available in the marketplace which can help transport the wires smoothly and without friction through conduits with rolls over distances that can reach the 100 meters from the packs location to the welding or metallizing torch where the wire consumable is actually melted or fused. Being able to position large packs in a safe centralized area, besides reducing the risks connected to their handling and transport and the welding sparks fire hazard, also allows an easier inspection without having to enter the production cell perimeter and eventually negatively interfere with the production cycles.
Bulk packs containing a large quantity of wire, which allow to produce continuously without interruptions, represent an essential requirement of highly productive wire farms setups.
Supports carrying wires are available in different formats: from small spools carrying as little as 0.5 kgs to bulk containers carrying up to 2 tons of product.
There are several ways to store a large quantity of wire consumable either on or inside a bulk container: from large spools which require some rotating de-reeling equipment, to reel capstans which must be placed on turntables to be emptied of their content. In both cases however, the wire is exposed to possible contamination, which can lead to rust and weld porosity and any rotational equipment which has to be utilized to unwind large wire spools or reels, takes precious and sometimes badly needed floor space.
A third and definitely more effective system was developed several years ago: a winding machine which plastically deforms the wire by straightening, stretching and turning it to impart a counter-torsion and subsequently lay it into a container in the shape of a horizontal coil. When the wire is paid out for consumption, it can easily and smoothly be extracted without any major feeding difficulty from its stationary container without need of turntables or de-reeling devices and, if the winding process has been done correctly, it should not tangle prior to exiting the pack. This process is called “twist-free” winding but it is not an easy one and sometimes, depending on the hardness, columnar strength, grade and chemistry, the wire can still retain some tension, which must be controlled during the extraction through a retainer plate of varying weight and shape, normally placed on the wire coil to ensure that only one strand at a time is being extracted from the container. If accidentally more loops feed out during the extraction process, the immediate consequence will be a tangle and a production interruption.
The prior art teaches of many inventions focused on developing or improving all sorts of systems to retain and brake the wire during pay out: from plates of various shapes to spherical marbles dropped freely on the wire or retaining devices with a rotating wire guiding arm and ribbing underneath the plate to ensure that only one strand is being pulled out and not more loops at the same time; the problem is that if the wire being paid out from the pack is charged with too much tension, it inevitably drags some wire loops toward the central plate opening, where they can fall and tangle if they have moved during the transport, regardless of the type of retainer used. The first reaction is always to increase the retaining weight, in order to keep the wire in check, but if retainer plates are too heavy they will inevitably deform the wires, and deformed wires can cause arc wandering issues and consequent weld quality problems and even very heavy retainers cannot always keep the wire controlled.
Among the many prior art patents describing various wire retaining systems for aluminum and all steel wires in general:
U.S. Pat. No. 5,746,380 describes a layer of spherical elements on the wire coil to control the wire pay-out.
WO 2016/022389 suggests a combination of a retainer plate with ribs and a wire guiding rotating arm, with the rotating arm having the scope to keep the wire constrained and limiting its range of movement, while guiding it towards the outside.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,410,111 teaches of a retainer plate with openings to make it lighter and prevent aluminium wire deformation.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,950,523 describes a combination of two plates interacting to control the wire strands in case they have been misplaced during transport and handling.
All of the formerly proposed solutions can become ineffective in presence of a wire excessively loaded with tension, because it can find a way to slip out uncontrolled from underneath the retainer plate and fall into the pack centre where eventually it tangles.
The equipment efficiency combined with the operator's skills and with a reliable wire retainer plate can truly make a difference in minimizing the residual tension left on the wire by the twist-free winding and ensuring a smooth wire feeding, but at the time of extracting the wire some other variables can intervene and negatively affect the wire performance: a bad adjustment of the wire feeder pressure rolls or worn out pressure rolls guiding grooves or “U” shaped as opposed to “V” shaped guiding grooves and vice-versa or, even worse, incorrect size grooves not matching the diameter of the wire in use. All of the above can contribute to charge a twist-free wound wire with tension, while it is being pulled from its container and as soon as the tension accumulation exceeds the braking effect exerted by the retainer plate, the wire springs out unchecked and eventually tangles and jams inside the pack, either in one single knot or in the form of an uncontrolled messy bundle of loops, thus causing the production interruption that the large bulk pack was designed to avoid in the first place.
The problem of the residual tension still present on the wire after the twist-free winding process, seems to be worse with 5000 grade aluminum wires, but it can affect all aluminum wires and those harder steel wires which are more resistant to deformation. The behavior of the 5000 grade aluminum wires is quite unpredictable, and it is probably linked to the chemistry of the wire itself or their hardness, which can vary depending on the annealing process which they undergo during their production. It has been noted that the 5000 grades aluminum welding wires have a tendency to partially revert back to their pre-torsion condition after having remained stored inside their bulk packs for a given period of time and the smaller is the container diameter the worse seems to be this type of “static” deformation.
In summary, even after the twist-free winding machine had done its job of correctly laying the torsion less wire inside the pack, other negative variables (equipment defects, an incorrect adjustment, adjustment to the container shape, etc.) can still negatively impact the wire performance, notwithstanding the skills and the special care used by the operator when adjusting the winding machine.
Scope of the invention is to intervene on the wire at some point between the coil and the wire feeder, by offsetting and neutralizing its residual tension to the point that even the payout controlling retainer plate might not be necessary or at least a very light and flexible retainer plate can be used instead.
The invention is designed to ensure a smooth and trouble-free wire payout from bulk packs, especially with aluminum welding wires but it is applicable to all wires in general after they have been deposited into the bulk packs with the twist-free winding process.
Generally speaking, it consists of a counter-tension rotating device which can be positioned anywhere between the wire coil and the wire feeder. In a preferred embodiment and in order to maximize its effectiveness, the device is mounted on top of the dome, right at the point where the wire exits the pack.
The device is equipped with at least one but preferably two (or more) wheels whose guiding grooves lock onto the wire and impart on it a counter-torsional movement by making it rotate on its axis in a given direction (clockwise or anti-clockwise), which is preferably the unwinding direction of the wire itself. This counter twist neutralizes whatever tension is still present on the wire regardless whether it is a consequence of an incorrect twist-free winding process or because of the excessive tension accumulated on the wire by a bad wheel pressure adjustment or by defective/worn out feeder roll grooves.
Additionally, the counter torsional force exerted on the wire conveniently maintains the wire pushed toward the external edge of the wire coil, thus preventing wire loops from falling uncontrolled into the open free space at the center of the bulk pack, even after they have been inadvertently displaced during handling or transport.
The rotation of the tension-relief device can be activated in two ways:
(1) by the mechanical combined action of two or more wheels connected to a rotating washer base and interacting with it through a bevel gear. With this embodiment a group of one or more grooved wheels (preferably two) are pushed against the wire being pulled by the feeder and in turn, thanks to their bevel gear, they engage and rotate a round geared washer base: while turning they “clutch” or grip the wire and impart on it a counter twisting force in the predetermined desired direction, with the rotation speed and its direction depending on the shape and orientation of the bevel gear.
(2) by an electrical motor which automatically determines the direction of the twist along the wire axis while the wire is being paid out. In this case the motor speed and the rotation of the wire is controlled by an external PLC which can be embedded in the wire feeder (as in the preferred embodiment) or placed outside the wire feeder.
With the mechanical embodiment the tension relieving rotating speed cannot be subsequently adjusted or paused, while the tension-relief device operated by a motor (which can be of any known type, like DC, AC, Brushless or Stepper) is definitely preferable and more flexible because it can be programmed through the PLC to automatically perform several important functions. It is possible to adapt the direction of rotation imparted onto the wire to the winding direction of the wire. Further, the control can determine when an excessive counter-tension force has accumulated on the wire and consequently activate or pause the rotation of the washer and grooved wheels through an electromagnet which engages or disengages the motor, as necessary.
The motor engagement can be activated also with a pneumatic or magnetic piston which pushes the mobile part of the device which carries the motor against the rotating washer carrying the group of grooved wheels which contribute to impart the counter-torsion effect onto the feeding wire. While in this case the motor rotates continuously and it only engages the rotation washer when it needs to impart the counter twist to offset the accumulating tension on the wire, the motor can also engage continuously the rotation washer through a belt or bevel gears, and in this case its function has to be controlled and programmed through the external PLC.
Generally speaking, the neutralization of the tension generated by the counter-twisting of wire along its axis, either in the clockwise or anti-clockwise direction as necessary, can actively contribute to a smooth wire payout even without the use of a retainer plate; or, if the preference goes to the employment of a retainer plate, it can at least be a very light and flexible one, and this can definitely be beneficial to prevent a possible deformation of softer aluminum wires.
In a preferred embodiment the retainer plate can still be placed on the wire coil and tied to the wire during handling and transportation, but it can be easily split in two or more sections for the purpose of being easily removed even with the wire already inserted into the guiding conduit.
The invention provides a device for imparting a torsional force onto a wire, having a base, a support mounted so as to be rotatable with respect to the base around an axis of rotation, the axis of rotation coinciding with a wire path extending through the base and the support, a wire clutching device mounted on the support and adapted to engage at a wire guided along the wire path, and a rotation mechanism which is adapted for rotating the support with respect to the base. The wire clutching device mechanically engages the wire such that it can exert a torsional force onto the wire to the desired extent.
The wire clutching device can be implemented in any form which allows wire pay out (meaning: a translational movement of the wire along the wire path) and at the same time imparting a rotational movement onto the wire. Preferably, the wire clutching device is a pair of rolls which are mounted on the support, the rolls being arranged on opposite sides of the wire path, at least one of the rolls having a wire reception groove. A pair of rolls is a very simple and yet effective means for mechanically engaging at the wire so as to rotate it around its axis while at the same time allowing wire pay out.
In order to ensure that different wires can be reliably rotated around its axis, a biasing device is provided for biasing the two rolls against each other, allowing to adapt the clutching force to the particular requirements.
The biasing device can comprise a hand wheel for applying a tightening torque to a biasing mechanism, a torque limiter being arranged in the torque path from the hand wheel to the biasing mechanism. The torque limiter prevents that excessive force is applied by the biasing device onto the wire.
According to an embodiment, a spring-loaded cam mechanism is provided which connects the hand wheel to a spindle nut. The cam mechanism allows implementing the torque limiting function in a technically simple yet effective manner.
Preferably, the torque limiter is adjustable so as to allow adapting the mechanism to different wires. Furthermore, the effect of wear can be compensated from time to time.
The rotation mechanism can comprise a gear adapted for converting a movement of the wire along the wire path into a rotation of the support with respect to the base, thereby avoiding the need for a separate drive for rotating the wire clutching mechanism.
The gear can be a bevel gear with a ring gear connected to the base and a pinion mounted rotatably on the support, resulting in a compact rotation mechanism.
As an alternative to a bevel gear, a worm drive can be used which is very compact.
In order to allow for a change of the direction in which the wire clutching device is being rotated when wire is being pulled through the wheels of the wire clutching device, two mounting positions for the pinion are provided on the support.
With a torque limiter associated with the rotation mechanism, the maximum amount of torsional force can very easily be limited to a desired threshold.
The torque limiter can be arranged between the gear and a shaft on which the gear is arranged. In this manner, a compact design can be achieved.
Preferably, the torque limiter is adjustable so as to adjust the mechanism to different properties of the wire.
According to an embodiment, the torque limiter comprises a Belleville spring which is advantageous in as it provides a spring force which changes only in significantly over a wide range of compression of the spring.
In an alternative design, the rotation mechanism can comprise a drive motor mounted on the base and adapted for rotating the support with respect to the base. The drive motor can be operated independently from the speed with which the wire is drawn through the wire clutching device, thus allowing to control the torsional force applied to the wire independently from the wire withdrawal speed.
A coupling device can be provided for connecting the motor to the support, allowing to disengage and engage the motor when appropriate.
In one technically simple yet reliable design, the coupling comprises an application device for urging a drive wheel connected to the drive motor, against a driven surface associated with the support.
The device for applying a torsional force onto the wire can comprise a motor current sensor for detecting when excessive torsional forces are imparted onto the wire. The motor current is namely a good indication of the applied torsional force.
The rotation mechanism can be an arm which has a wire receiving opening arranged eccentrically with respect to the axis of rotation of the support, thereby using the tension force of the wire to rotate the base.
The invention also provides a system with a container in which an amount of wire is contained in the form of a coil consisting of a plurality of loops of wire, a device for imparting a torsional force onto a wire, the device being mounted above the wire, the device having a base, a support mounted so as to be rotatable with respect to the base around an axis of rotation, the axis of rotation coinciding with a wire path extending through the base and the support, a pair of rolls which are mounted on the support, the rolls being arranged on opposite sides of the wire path, at least one of the rolls having a wire reception groove, and a rotation mechanism which is adapted for rotating the support with respect to the base, the system further comprising at least one wire feeder which is arranged downstream of the device for imparting a torsional force onto the wire. The device for imparting a torsional force onto the wire is conveniently controlled directly from the control of the wire feeder.
Preferably, two wire feeders are being used, namely an auxiliary wire feeder which is arranged downstream of the device for imparting a rotation onto the wire, and a main wire feeder which is provided downstream of the auxiliary wire feeder and in a significant distance therefrom. Using two wire feeders allows arranging the wire container in a significant distance from the place where the wire is being consumed.
In a preferred embodiment, the wire is a welding wire made from an aluminum alloy comprising magnesium. Field test have shown that his type of welding wire has a tendency internal stress when being stored for some time. Accordingly, the effect of the device for imparting a torsional force onto the welding wire is very beneficial.
In the drawings,
In
Wire 2 can be a welding wire. It can also be any consumable wire which is used for 3D printing, for metallization, etc.
Wire 2 is withdrawn from container 1 through an upper opening of the container. A cover or a dome 4 can be placed on top of the container 1, with the main purpose of dome 4 being to prevent contamination of the interior of container 1 during the time period when the wire is being consumed.
In order to prevent loops of wire from falling into the interior of coil 3, a retainer 5 is placed on the upper surface of coil 3. The main purpose of retainer 5 is to exert a braking force onto the wire and to create friction with its weight.
As can be seen in
An important element of the invention is a device 10 for imparting a torsional force onto the wire 2. Generally speaking, device 10 rotates the wire around its own axis, thereby offsetting some of the residual stress in the wire and also ensuring that the loops of wire remain in their position within container 1.
Downstream of device 10, a wire feeder 6 can be arranged which advances the wire into a wire guide 7 and towards the place where the wire is being consumed, for example to a welding robot. A main wire feeder can be used close to the welding robot so that wire feeder 6 is an auxiliary wire feeder.
Device 10 is arranged close to container 1. In the embodiment shown, device 10 is placed on dome 4 (please see in particular
In
Device 10 comprises a base 12 and a support 14. Support 14 is mounted so as to be rotatable with respect to base 12 around an axis 16 which coincides with a wire path along which wire 2 is guided through device 10. A wire inlet guide 15 is attached to support 14.
A roller bearing 18 is used for mounting support 14 on base 12.
A wire clutching device 20 is mounted on support 14. It here consists of two rolls 22 arranged on opposite sides of wire path 16, with both rolls 22 each having a wire reception groove 24.
Wire reception grooves 24 have a width and depth adapted to the dimension of the particular wire so as to tightly engage the wire. When wire feeder 6 withdraws the wire from the container, the wire passes through the wire path 16 between the two adjacent rolls 22, with rolls 22 being entrained or rotated by the wire.
Device 10 further comprises a rotation mechanism 26 which is adapted for rotating the support with respect to the base. Rotation mechanism 26 is here formed from a gear, in particular a bevel gear 28, which comprises a ring gear 30 fixedly provided on base 12, and a pinion 32 which is mounted on support 14.
Pinion 32 is connected via a gear drive 34 to one of rolls 22. Thus, when the rolls 22 are entrained by the wire, rotation of the rolls is transmitted via the gears to pinion 32, which engages into ring gear 30. Accordingly, support 14 is rotated with respect to base 12 when the wire is drawn through device 10.
As rolls 22 tightly engage the wire, rotation of support 14 and accordingly of wire clutching device 22 imparts a torsional force onto the wire.
The amount of torsional force to be applied onto the wire largely depends from characteristics of the wire. For some wires, it has been found out that applying 1.5 revolutions of wire clutching device 20 per loop of withdrawn wire provides good results. The ratio of revolutions per length of withdrawn wire can be adapted by selecting the size of rolls 22 and the transmission ratio of rotation mechanism 26.
It has been found out that wire clutching device 20 should rotate in the same direction in which the withdrawn wire rotates within container 1. As an example, when looking into container 1 from the top and the wire is withdrawn in a clockwise direction, wire clutching device 20 should also rotate in a clockwise direction.
In order to be able to adapt device 10 to both possible winding directions of the coil in container 1, two amounting positions for pinion 32 are possible. As can be seen in
In order to prevent excessive torsional force from being applied to the wire, a torque limiter can be provided somewhere in the rotation mechanism 20. The torque limiter could be formed by spring-loaded friction disks or a similar mechanism.
A second embodiment of device 10 is shown in
The general difference between the first and the second embodiment is that in the second embodiment, the rotation mechanism 26 comprises a worm drive 29, formed from a worm gear 31 fixedly provided on base 12, and a screw gear 33 mounted on support 14.
Screw gear 33 is connected via gear drive 34 to one of rolls 22. Thus, when the rolls 22 are entrained by the wire, rotation of the rolls is transmitted via the gears to screw gear 33 which engages into worm gear 31 and, when being rotated, rotates support 14 with respect to base 12.
In a manner similar to the first embodiment, the sense of rotation can be reversed by mounting gear drive 34 on the opposite side of support 14.
It is also possible to exchange gear drive 34 by an electric motor so as to be able to rotate support 14 with respect to base 12 independent from a fixed transmission ratio of wire pay out vs. rotation of the support.
The second embodiment allows to conveniently change the transmission ratio from rolls 22 to screw gear 33, as will be explained in the following with reference to
In
In
In
Intermediate gear 34b is mounted in a sliding guide 35 which allows to quickly adapt the gear ratio to different pack dimensions (and the corresponding loop diameter inside the pack).
A dust cover 17 closes device 10 so as to prevent dust and dirt from entering into device 10 and container 1.
A third embodiment of device 10 is shown in
The general difference between the first and second embodiments and the third embodiment is that the first and second embodiments are “passive” devices in which the torsional force applied onto the wire is generated by the movement of the wire itself while in the second embodiment, the torsional force is actively generated by a motor.
The third embodiment also uses a worm drive 29 formed from a worm gear 31 and a screw gear 33. Here, worm gear 31 is fixedly connected to support 14 while screw gear 33 is mounted on base 12.
A motor 40 is provided for driving (via a suitable reduction gear) screw gear 33 worm gear 31.
Rolls 22 are mounted on support 14 so as to be rotatable. They are biased with an adjustable force against each other.
In the third embodiment, device 10 is controlled by a control which can be incorporated into wire feeder 6. It is also possible to implement the control separately.
When wire is withdrawn from container 1, electric motor 40 is operated so as to rotate wire clutching device 20 in the correct direction, thereby exerting a torsional force onto the wire.
The amount of rotation of wire clutching device 20 per length unit of withdrawn wire can very conveniently be controlled via the control. In order to prevent that excessive torsional forces are exerted onto the wire, the motor current of motor 40 can be controlled. Should excessive torsional forces are being built up in the wire, the motor current increases as a higher force is required to rotate the wire. In such event, the speed of operation of motor 40 can be reduced or stopped, or it is possible to deactivate biasing device 46 so that support 14 can freely rotate, thereby releasing the torsional tension in the wire. Subsequently, biasing device 46 can be reactivated, and operation of motor 40 can be resumed.
The advantage of the third embodiment is that many of its components can be used both for a passive device as per the second embodiment and for the active device as per the third embodiment.
A fourth embodiment of device 10 is shown in
The general difference between the third embodiment and the fourth embodiment is that in the fourth embodiment, there is no intermeshing gear connection between the motor and the support (thus a positive connection) but a friction-based connection.
Rotating mechanism 26 here comprises a drive motor 40 (an electric motor) which drives a drive wheel 42. Electric motor 40 together with drive wheel 42 are mounted on a carrier 44 which is pivotably connected to base 12.
An application device 46 which is here in the form of a solenoid, is mounted on base 12 and is adapted for urging carrier 44 together with motor 40 and drive wheel 42 in a direction towards support 14. More specifically, application device 46 presses drive wheel 42 against a cylindrical driven surface 48 of support 14.
Drive wheel 42 can be provided with an O-ring 50 or some other friction enhancing element in order to ensure that support 14 can be rotated by motor 40.
Wire clutching device 20 of the fourth embodiment basically corresponds to the first embodiment in as it contains two rolls 22 which are urged against each other and against the wire passing through between the rolls. A biasing device 52 is here provided which allows changing the force with which the two rolls are pressed against each other.
When wire is withdrawn from container 1, electric motor 40 is operated so as to rotate wire clutching device 20 in the correct direction, thereby exerting the desired torsional force onto the wire. At the same time, biasing device 46 is activated so as to ensure that the power of motor 40 is transmitted to support 14.
In
In
The embodiment of
Gear drive 34 here comprises a shaft 70 on which one of rolls 22 and one of two gear wheels 72 which synchronize rotation of the two rolls 22 is mounted. Further, a gear wheel 74 is mounted on shaft 70, which meshes with additional gear wheel which finally entrain screw gear 32 which engages into worm gear 31.
A torque limiter 76 is arranged in the torque transmission path between shaft 70 and gear wheel 34.
Generally speaking, torque limiter 76 prevents that excessive torque is transmitted from shaft 70 to gear wheel 74.
Torque limiter 76 comprises a pressing ring 78, a spring 80 which is here a Belleville spring, an adjusting screw 82 and a locking mechanism 84.
Gear wheel 74 is arranged adjacent a shoulder 84 of shaft 70. By screwing adjustment screw 82 onto shaft 70, spring 80 is biased by adjusting screw 82 against pressing ring 78 which in turn presses gear wheel 74 against shoulder 84. Thus, a frictional force is created which allows transmission of a torque up to a predefined threshold from shaft 70 to gear wheel 74.
By adjusting adjustment screw 82 on shaft 70, the level of admissible torque transmission can be adjusted. Locking mechanism 86 allows to lock adjustment screw 82 in its position once the desired level of torque transmission is achieved.
The torque limiter reliably ensures that no excessive torsional forces are created which then would be applied to the wire.
Biasing device 52 serves for exerting a force onto a lever 53 which in turn results in a force which biases rolls 22 towards each other.
Biasing device 52 comprises a traction rod 90 which is connected to lever 53 and on which a traction force can be applied by means of biasing device 52, with biasing device 52 being supported on an abutment 92.
Abutment 92 has the form of a hook into which a wedge-shaped pressing part 94 engages (please see in particular
On pressing part 94, a nut 96 is supported which is threaded onto traction rod 90. Nut 96 can be rotated by means of a hand wheel 98 which is connected to nut 96 by means of a cam mechanism 100. Cam mechanism 100 comprises a cam surface 102 which is provided in nut 96, and a transmission pin 104 which is supported in hand wheel 98 in a manner so as to be displaceable in a direction parallel to the axis of rotation of hand wheel 98. On its side facing away from cam surface 102, pressure pin 104 is engaged by a pressing washer 106 which in turn is biased towards pressure pin 104 by a stack of springs 108. Here, Belleville springs are used.
Springs 108 are capped in a preloaded condition by means of adjustment wheel 110, the axial position thereof being adjustable by means of a set screw 112. Set screw 112 is accessible after removal of a cap 114.
By rotating set screw 112, the preload of springs 108 can be adjusted. By adjusting the preload, the maximum torque which can be transmitted by rotation of pressing pin 104 onto cam surface 102 of nut 96 can be adjusted. Looking at
Once the desired level of torque transmission from hand wheel 98 to nut 96 is adjusted by means of set screw 112, a locking screw 116 is tightened.
In
The general difference between the embodiment of
Support 14 is here rotated by means of an arm 120 which has a wire receiving opening 122 arranged excentrically with respect to the axis of rotation of support 14. As wire 2 is held in container 1 in the form of a coil, any traction force acting between the part of the wire entering between rolls 22 and the part of the wire received in the form of a coil, creates a force at wire receiving opening 122 which has a component directed in a peripheral direction.
An alternative to the embodiment of
In
In the embodiment of
Motor 140 is provided with electric power by means of sliding contacts 144 arranged concentrically with respect to the axis of rotation of device 10.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/747,046, filed Jan. 20, 2020, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
318062 | Warren | May 1885 | A |
532565 | Kilmer | Jan 1895 | A |
617353 | Redmond | Jan 1899 | A |
627722 | Edwards | Jun 1899 | A |
932808 | Pelton | Aug 1909 | A |
1276117 | Riebe | Aug 1918 | A |
1468994 | Cook | Sep 1923 | A |
1508689 | Glasser | Sep 1924 | A |
1640368 | Obetz | Aug 1927 | A |
1821354 | Meyer | Sep 1931 | A |
1907051 | Emery | May 1933 | A |
1936227 | Cook | Nov 1933 | A |
2027670 | Broeren | Jan 1936 | A |
2027674 | Broeren | Jan 1936 | A |
2059462 | Jungmann | Nov 1936 | A |
2078161 | Rietsch | Apr 1937 | A |
2329369 | Haver | Sep 1943 | A |
2366101 | Grothey | Dec 1944 | A |
2407746 | Johnson | Sep 1946 | A |
2457910 | McLaren et al. | Jan 1949 | A |
2477059 | Hill | Jul 1949 | A |
2483760 | Duncan | Oct 1949 | A |
2579131 | Tinsley | Dec 1951 | A |
2580900 | Epstein | Jan 1952 | A |
2679571 | Chappel | May 1954 | A |
2694130 | Howard | Nov 1954 | A |
2713938 | Snyder | Jul 1955 | A |
2724538 | Schweich | Nov 1955 | A |
2752108 | Richardson | Jun 1956 | A |
2838922 | Gift | Jun 1958 | A |
2849195 | Richardson | Aug 1958 | A |
2864565 | Whearly | Dec 1958 | A |
2869719 | Hubbard | Jan 1959 | A |
2880305 | Baird | Mar 1959 | A |
2911166 | Haugwitz | Nov 1959 | A |
2916944 | Diesfeld | Dec 1959 | A |
2929576 | Henning | Mar 1960 | A |
2966258 | Krafft | Dec 1960 | A |
2974850 | Mayer | Mar 1961 | A |
2984596 | Franer | May 1961 | A |
3022415 | Francois | Feb 1962 | A |
3096951 | Jenson | Jul 1963 | A |
3108180 | Linnander | Oct 1963 | A |
3119042 | Bond | Jan 1964 | A |
3185185 | Pfund | May 1965 | A |
3244347 | Jenk | Apr 1966 | A |
3274850 | Tascio | Sep 1966 | A |
3283121 | Bernard et al. | Nov 1966 | A |
3284608 | McDonald | Nov 1966 | A |
3344682 | Bratz | Oct 1967 | A |
3352412 | Draving et al. | Nov 1967 | A |
3433504 | Hanes | Mar 1969 | A |
3463416 | Quenot | Aug 1969 | A |
3478435 | Cook | Nov 1969 | A |
3491876 | Zecchin | Jan 1970 | A |
3512635 | Lang | May 1970 | A |
3536888 | Borneman | Oct 1970 | A |
3565129 | Field | Feb 1971 | A |
3567900 | Nelson | Mar 1971 | A |
3576966 | Sullivan | May 1971 | A |
3586222 | Rosen | Jun 1971 | A |
3595277 | Lefever | Jul 1971 | A |
3630425 | Wilkens | Dec 1971 | A |
3648920 | Stump | Mar 1972 | A |
3672655 | Carter | Jun 1972 | A |
3675499 | Marosy | Jul 1972 | A |
3690567 | Borneman | Sep 1972 | A |
3724249 | Asbeck et al. | Apr 1973 | A |
3729092 | Marcell | Apr 1973 | A |
3730136 | Okada | May 1973 | A |
3799215 | Willems | Mar 1974 | A |
3815842 | Scrogin | Jun 1974 | A |
3823894 | Frederick et al. | Jul 1974 | A |
3901425 | Taylor et al. | Aug 1975 | A |
3939978 | Thomaswick | Feb 1976 | A |
4000797 | Ducanis | Jan 1977 | A |
4043331 | Martin et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
4044583 | Kinney, Jr. | Aug 1977 | A |
4074105 | Minehisa et al. | Feb 1978 | A |
4097004 | Reese | Jun 1978 | A |
4102483 | Ueyama et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
4113795 | Izawa et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
4127590 | Endo et al. | Nov 1978 | A |
4157436 | Endo et al. | Jun 1979 | A |
4161248 | Kalmanovitch | Jul 1979 | A |
4171783 | Waltemath | Oct 1979 | A |
4172375 | Rushforth et al. | Oct 1979 | A |
4188526 | Asano | Feb 1980 | A |
4222535 | Hosbein | Sep 1980 | A |
4254322 | Asano | Mar 1981 | A |
4274607 | Priest | Jun 1981 | A |
4280951 | Saito et al. | Jul 1981 | A |
4293103 | Tsukamoto | Oct 1981 | A |
4354487 | Oczkowski et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4392606 | Fremion | Jul 1983 | A |
4396797 | Sakuragi et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4429001 | Kolpin et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4451014 | Kitt et al. | May 1984 | A |
4464919 | Labbe | Aug 1984 | A |
4500315 | Pieniak et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
4531040 | Nawa | Jul 1985 | A |
4540225 | Johnson et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4546631 | Eisinger | Oct 1985 | A |
4575612 | Prunier | Mar 1986 | A |
4581514 | Inoue | Apr 1986 | A |
4582198 | Ditton | Apr 1986 | A |
4585487 | Destree et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4623063 | Balkin | Nov 1986 | A |
4737567 | Matsumoto et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4742088 | Kim | May 1988 | A |
4826497 | Marcus et al. | May 1989 | A |
4855179 | Bourland et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4868366 | Joseph et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4869367 | Kawasaki et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4891493 | Sato et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4916282 | Chamming et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4918286 | Boyer | Apr 1990 | A |
4949567 | Corbin | Aug 1990 | A |
4974789 | Milburn | Dec 1990 | A |
5051539 | Leathers-Wiessner | Sep 1991 | A |
5061259 | Goldman et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5078269 | Dekko et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5100397 | Poccia et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5105943 | Lesko et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5109983 | Malone et al. | May 1992 | A |
5147646 | Graham | Sep 1992 | A |
5165217 | Sobel et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5201419 | Hayes | Apr 1993 | A |
5205412 | Krieg | Apr 1993 | A |
5215338 | Kimura et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5227314 | Brown et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5261625 | Lanoue | Nov 1993 | A |
5277314 | Cooper et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5314111 | Takaku et al. | May 1994 | A |
5368245 | Fore | Nov 1994 | A |
5372269 | Sutton et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5452841 | Sibata et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5485968 | Fujioka | Jan 1996 | A |
5494160 | Gelmetti | Feb 1996 | A |
5530088 | Sheen et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5553810 | Bobeczko | Sep 1996 | A |
5562646 | Goldman et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5585013 | Truty | Dec 1996 | A |
5586733 | Miura et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5590848 | Shore et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5629377 | Burgert et al. | May 1997 | A |
5665801 | Chang et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5692700 | Bobeczko | Dec 1997 | A |
5714156 | Schmidt et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5738209 | Burr et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5739704 | Clark | Apr 1998 | A |
5746380 | Chung | May 1998 | A |
5758834 | Dragoo et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5778939 | Hok-Yin | Jul 1998 | A |
5816466 | Seufer | Oct 1998 | A |
5819934 | Cooper | Oct 1998 | A |
5845862 | Cipriani | Dec 1998 | A |
5847184 | Kleiner | Dec 1998 | A |
5865051 | Otzen et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5921391 | Ortiz et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5931408 | Ishii et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5932123 | Marhofer | Aug 1999 | A |
5971308 | Boulton | Oct 1999 | A |
5988370 | Roemer et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5990377 | Chen et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6016911 | Chen | Jan 2000 | A |
6019303 | Cooper | Feb 2000 | A |
6103358 | Bruggermann et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6150632 | Fisher | Nov 2000 | A |
6159591 | Beihoffer et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6236017 | Smartt | May 2001 | B1 |
6237768 | Cipriani | May 2001 | B1 |
6245880 | Takeuchi et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6255371 | Schlosser et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6260781 | Cooper | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6301944 | Offer | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6322016 | Jacobsson et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6340522 | Burke et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6408888 | Baeumer et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6409116 | Brown | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6417425 | Whitmore et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6425549 | Bae et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6464077 | Liu | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6479793 | Wittmann | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6481892 | Agostini | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6498227 | Horie | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6524010 | Derman | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6547176 | Blain et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6564943 | Barton et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6613848 | Wang et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6636776 | Barton et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6648141 | Land | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6649870 | Barton et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6708864 | Ferguson, III et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6715608 | Moore | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6745899 | Barton | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6749139 | Speck | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6750262 | Hahnle et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6753454 | Smith et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6821454 | Visca et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6831142 | Mertens et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6831251 | Artelsmair | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6872275 | Ko et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6889835 | Land | May 2005 | B2 |
6913145 | Barton | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6938767 | Gelmetti | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6977357 | Hsu et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7004318 | Barton | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7108916 | Ehrnsperger et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7147176 | Rexhaj | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7152735 | Dragoo et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7156334 | Fore et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7178755 | Hsu et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7198152 | Barton et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7220942 | Barton et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7301124 | Kaufman | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7309038 | Carroscia | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7377388 | Hsu et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
RE40351 | Cipriani | Jun 2008 | E |
7398881 | Barton et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7410111 | Carroscia | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7441657 | Gelmetti | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7441721 | Bae et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7533906 | Luettgen et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7563840 | Ye | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7748530 | Hsu et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7950523 | Gelmetti | May 2011 | B2 |
8207475 | Minato et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8225977 | Meckler | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8235210 | De Lacerda et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
9414759 | Lang | Aug 2016 | B2 |
10350696 | Gelmetti et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
20010014706 | Sprenger et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010020663 | Peterson | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020000391 | Kawasai et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020003014 | Homma | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020014477 | Lee et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020039869 | Achille | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020108985 | Garcia et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120178 | Tartaglia et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030042162 | Land | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030042163 | Cipriant | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030052030 | Gelmetti | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030184086 | Christianson | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040004113 | Blankenship | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040011776 | Mukai | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040020041 | Ferguson, III et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040050441 | Roschi | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040133176 | Muthiah et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040155090 | B.-Jensen | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040176557 | Mertens et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040186244 | Hatsuda et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040201117 | Anderson | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040241333 | Cielenski et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040265387 | Hermeling et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050008776 | Chhabra et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050230372 | Ott | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050258290 | Kuper | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050261461 | Maeda et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060016792 | Uecker et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060027699 | Bae et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060070987 | Daniel | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060074154 | Harashina et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060131293 | Kaufman | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060138116 | Lipnevicius | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060155254 | Sanz et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060207981 | Diekmann | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060247343 | Kishimoto et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060258824 | Oshima et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060278747 | Carroscia | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070056943 | Tenbrink | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070080154 | Ott | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070151964 | Artelsmair et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070158324 | O'Donnell | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070175786 | Nicklas | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070175965 | Carroscia | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070272573 | Gelmetti | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070284354 | Laymon | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080149608 | Albrecht | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080156925 | Cooper | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080257874 | Kaufman et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080257875 | De Keizer | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080300349 | Fuchikami et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080314876 | Pinsonneault et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080314884 | Fujiwara | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090014572 | Weissbrod et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090014579 | Bender et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090200284 | Sanchez | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100116803 | Gelmetti | May 2010 | A1 |
20100301029 | Meckler | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110042355 | Gelmetti | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110073703 | Gelmetti et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110094911 | Gelmetti | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110114523 | Gelmetti | May 2011 | A1 |
20110114617 | Gelmetti et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110132880 | Kossowan | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110220629 | Mehn et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120160819 | Enyedy | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120298630 | Stoutamire | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130112676 | Hutchison | May 2013 | A1 |
20130180971 | Peters et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130193124 | Peters | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130193259 | Weissbrod et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130200055 | Enyedy | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140076872 | Ott | Mar 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1466469 | Jan 2004 | CN |
1626423 | Jun 2005 | CN |
202240091 | May 2012 | CN |
1082215 | Nov 1957 | DE |
1154624 | Sep 1963 | DE |
2122958 | Nov 1972 | DE |
2 148 348 | Apr 1973 | DE |
2202177 | Jul 1973 | DE |
2525938 | Dec 1976 | DE |
28 16 100 | Oct 1978 | DE |
36 09 839 | Sep 1987 | DE |
19909214 | Mar 1999 | DE |
199 10 128 | Jan 2001 | DE |
19958697 | Jun 2001 | DE |
100 06 592 | Aug 2001 | DE |
10202839 | Aug 2003 | DE |
103 60 466 | Jul 2005 | DE |
102007015946 | Oct 2008 | DE |
202011104120 | Jan 2012 | DE |
0017445 | Oct 1980 | EP |
0408259 | Apr 1992 | EP |
0519424 | Dec 1992 | EP |
0665 166 | Jan 1995 | EP |
0686439 | Dec 1995 | EP |
0806429 | Nov 1997 | EP |
1057751 | Dec 2000 | EP |
1 275 595 | Jan 2003 | EP |
1 295 813 | Mar 2003 | EP |
1357059 | Oct 2003 | EP |
1 471 024 | Oct 2004 | EP |
1 698 421 | Jun 2006 | EP |
1 974 846 | Oct 2008 | EP |
2 256 064 | Jan 2010 | EP |
2 354 039 | Jan 2010 | EP |
2 168 706 | Mar 2010 | EP |
2 286 950 | Feb 2011 | EP |
2695696 | Feb 2014 | EP |
2949416 | Dec 2015 | EP |
1215111 | Apr 1960 | FR |
2055181 | May 1971 | FR |
2267255 | Apr 1974 | FR |
2595674 | Mar 1988 | FR |
2 888 825 | Jan 2007 | FR |
880502 | Oct 1961 | GB |
1168928 | Oct 1969 | GB |
1229913 | Apr 1971 | GB |
1 575 157 | Sep 1980 | GB |
2059462 | Apr 1981 | GB |
2 264 482 | Sep 1993 | GB |
2 332 451 | Jun 1999 | GB |
49-13065 | Feb 1974 | JP |
54-035842 | Mar 1979 | JP |
54-043856 | Apr 1979 | JP |
55-054295 | Apr 1980 | JP |
55112176 | Aug 1980 | JP |
55-156694 | Dec 1980 | JP |
56-023376 | Mar 1981 | JP |
57-102471 | Jun 1982 | JP |
58-035068 | Mar 1983 | JP |
58-70384 | May 1983 | JP |
59-197386 | Nov 1984 | JP |
59-229287 | Dec 1984 | JP |
59-232669 | Dec 1984 | JP |
60-021181 | Feb 1985 | JP |
60-082275 | May 1985 | JP |
60-082276 | May 1985 | JP |
60-184422 | Sep 1985 | JP |
60-223664 | Nov 1985 | JP |
61-162541 | Jul 1986 | JP |
61-293674 | Dec 1986 | JP |
62-009774 | Jan 1987 | JP |
62-111872 | May 1987 | JP |
62-287055 | Dec 1987 | JP |
63-147781 | Jun 1988 | JP |
1-65265 | Apr 1989 | JP |
1-240222 | Sep 1989 | JP |
3 -264169 | Nov 1991 | JP |
03264169 | Nov 1991 | JP |
4-112169 | Apr 1992 | JP |
04-133973 | May 1992 | JP |
4-274875 | Sep 1992 | JP |
H05104248 | Apr 1993 | JP |
5 - 178538 | Jul 1993 | JP |
7-247058 | Sep 1995 | JP |
8-40642 | Feb 1996 | JP |
08-150492 | Jun 1996 | JP |
08-267274 | Oct 1996 | JP |
2000-202630 | Jul 2000 | JP |
2000-225468 | Aug 2000 | JP |
2000-263239 | Sep 2000 | JP |
2001-26375 | Jan 2001 | JP |
2001-150187 | Jun 2001 | JP |
2001-323268 | Nov 2001 | JP |
2004-025242 | Jan 2004 | JP |
2004-025243 | Jan 2004 | JP |
2005-169499 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2007-927 | Jan 2007 | JP |
2007-29971 | Feb 2007 | JP |
2002-0077857 | Oct 2002 | KR |
20080013519 | Feb 2008 | KR |
793678 | Jan 1981 | SU |
1412830 | Jul 1988 | SU |
WO 8103319 | Nov 1981 | WO |
WO 8810230 | Dec 1988 | WO |
WO 94-00493 | Jan 1994 | WO |
WO 94-19258 | Sep 1994 | WO |
WO 9700878 | Jan 1997 | WO |
WO 9852844 | Nov 1998 | WO |
WO 00-50197 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO 0127365 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO 02094493 | Nov 2002 | WO |
WO 03-106096 | Dec 2003 | WO |
WO 2005005704 | Jan 2005 | WO |
WO2005042201 | May 2005 | WO |
WO 2005061168 | Jul 2005 | WO |
2006091075 | Aug 2006 | WO |
WO 2007010171 | Jan 2007 | WO |
WO 2007112972 | Oct 2007 | WO |
WO 2007149689 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO 2009007845 | Jan 2009 | WO |
WO2009027784 | Mar 2009 | WO |
WO 2009143917 | Dec 2009 | WO |
WO 2011147565 | Dec 2011 | WO |
WO 2013092658 | Jun 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“International Plastics Flammability Handbook” Jurgen Troitzsch, 2nd edition, 1990, pp. 33, 43-49 and 59 (11 pgs). |
Chinese Official Action, application No. 200580051604.8, dated Mar. 17, 2010 (10 pgs). |
EPO Office Action issued for related application No. 09753572.8, dated May 2, 2012 (7 pgs). |
European Office Action for corresponding application No. 10 014 553.1-2302, dated Apr. 3, 2012 (4 pgs). |
European Office Action issued for 09777298.2, dated Aug. 31, 2012 (4 pgs). |
European Office Action issued in application No. 16180212.9, dated Jan. 19, 2017 (7 pgs). |
European Search Report issued in application No. 16160312.1, dated Sep. 19, 2016 (7 pgs). |
European Search Report, application No. 07014170.1, dated Sep. 17, 2008 (10 pgs). |
Extended European Search Report issued in application No. 15168866.0, dated Dec. 22, 2015 (6 pgs). |
Extended European Search Report issued in related application No. 13179908.2, dated Nov. 13, 2013 (6 pgs). |
Hansen et al., “Water Absorption and Mechanical Properties of Electrospun Structured Hydrogels”, Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 95, pp. 427-434 (2005) (8 pgs). |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued for related application No. PCT/EP2009/001285, dated Nov. 30, 2010 (6 pgs). |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Sep. 16, 2010 (5 pgs). |
International Preliminary Report, PCT/IPEA/409, dated Dec. 23, 2005, 7 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in corresponding PCT Appln. No. PCT/EP2009/005246, dated Apr. 6, 2010 (9 pgs). |
International Search Report issued in Applicants' underlying PCT Application Serial No. PCT/EP09/001285, dated Feb. 24, 2009 (3 pgs). |
International Search Report, dated Jul. 6, 2009 (3 pgs). |
Italian Search Report issued in related application No. MI20121423, dated Apr. 29, 2013 (2 pgs). |
Korean Official Action dated May 16, 2011, Appln. No. 2008-7005433, (3 pgs). |
Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 18, 2013 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/994,686 (10 pgs). |
Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 5, 2013 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/593,271 (15 pgs). |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/481,722, dated May 4, 2018 (19 pgs). |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/850,753, dated Jan. 19, 2018 (14 pgs). |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/850,753, dated Mar. 27, 2018 (14 pgs). |
Notice of Allowance issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 12/917,320 dated Jun. 18, 2012 (25 pgs). |
Office Action issued for related U.S. Appl. No. 12/618,250, dated Apr. 26, 2012 (11 pgs). |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/912,016, dated Apr. 21, 2017 (25 pgs). |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/195,497, dated Feb. 23, 2018 (30 pgs). |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/195,497, dated Mar. 23, 2017 (24 pgs). |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/195,497, dated May 19, 2016 (35 pgs). |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/195,497, dated Sep. 9, 2016 (21 pgs). |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/195,497, dated Sep. 7, 2017 (29 pgs). |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/289,090, dated Aug. 4, 2016 (10 pgs). |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/289,090, dated Dec. 17, 2018 (11 pgs). |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/289,090, dated Jan. 4, 2018 (18 pgs). |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/289,090, dated Mar. 17, 2016 (30 pgs). |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/289,090, dated Nov. 6, 2017 (6 pgs). |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/289,090, dated Sep. 18, 2017 (27 pgs). |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/289,090. dated Jul. 10, 2018 (30 pgs). |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/481,722, dated Dec. 12, 2017 (16 pgs). |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/481,722, dated Jan. 26, 2017 (16 pgs). |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/481,722, dated Jul. 17, 2017 (23 pgs). |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/481,722, dated Jun. 14, 2016 (25 pgs). |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/481,722, dated Nov. 4, 2016 (18 pgs). |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/679,768, dated Jan. 30, 2017 (57 pgs). |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/679,768, dated Jan. 12, 2018 (26 pgs). |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/679,768, dated Jan. 24, 2019 (20 pgs). |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/850,753, dated Aug. 25, 2017 (64 pgs). |
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 12/572,994 dated Nov. 25, 2011 (11 pgs). |
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 12/572,994 dated Aug. 12, 2011 (13pgs). |
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 12/572,994, dated Apr. 24, 2013 (22 pgs). |
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 12/593,271 dated Aug. 31, 2012 (7pgs). |
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 12/789,095 dated Jun. 12, 2012 (8pgs). |
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 13/330,314, dated Feb. 28, 2014 (10 pgs). |
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 13/382,491, dated Jul. 11, 2013 (15 pgs). |
OfficeAction issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/289,090, dated Feb. 13, 2017 (21 pgs). |
PCT International Search Report, dated Nov. 6, 2008 (18 pgs). |
Plaza et al., Preparation of ethylenebis(nitrilodimethylene)tetrakis(phenylphosphinic acid), Inorganic Synthesis, vol. 16, No. 199, abstract, one page. |
Search Report received in Applicant's counterpart European Patent Application Serial No. 08017572.2-2302, dated Mar. 13, 2009 (5 pgs). |
Search Report received in Applicant's counterpart European Patent Application Serial No. 10014216.5-1256, dated Apr. 14, 2011 (8 pgs). |
Search Report received in Applicant's counterpart European Patent Application Serial No. 11000892.7-2302, dated Jul. 19, 2011 (8 pgs). |
Search Report received in Applicant's counterpart European Patent Application Serial No. 11000236.7, dated Aug. 4, 2011 (8 pgs). |
U.S. Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 12/572,994, dated Sep. 17, 2013 (13 pgs). |
Ullmanns Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry, Sulfuric Acid & Sulfur Trioxide to Tetrahydrofuran, Superabsorbents, 6th Edition, vol. 35, pp. 73, 80, 86 and 89 (2003) (5 pgs). |
U.S. Official Action dated Dec. 14, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/994,686 (17 pgs). |
U.S. Official Action dated Feb. 13, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/917,320 (13 pgs). |
U.S. Official Action dated Mar. 5, 2013 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/382,491 (33 pgs). |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/596,697, filed Jun. 21, 2006. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/466,048, filed Aug. 21, 2006. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/545,717, filed Aug. 21, 2009. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/545/720, filed Aug. 21, 2009. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/593,271, filed Sep. 25, 2009. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/572,994, filed Oct. 2, 2009. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/618,165, filed Nov. 13, 2009. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/618,250, filed Nov. 13, 2009. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/691,554, filed Jan. 21, 2010. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/789,095, filed May 27, 2010. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/994,686, filed Nov. 24, 2010. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/330,314, filed Dec. 19, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/382,491, filed Jan. 5, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/744,394, filed Jan. 17, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/912,016, filed Jun. 6, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/030,879, filed Sep. 18, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/195,497, filed Mar. 3, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/289,090, filed May 28, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/481,722, filed Sep. 9, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/679,768, filed Apr. 6, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/850,753, filed Sep. 10, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/295,797, filed Oct. 17, 2016. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/747,046, filed Jan. 20, 2020. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/289,090, filed May 28, 2014, Gelmetti et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/679,768, filed Apr. 6, 2015, Gelmetti et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/747,046, filed Jan. 20, 2020, Gelmetti et al. |
European Search Report, application No. 10014553.1, dated Mar. 2, 2011 (7 pgs). |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/679,768, dated Aug. 2, 2017 (33 pgs). |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 16/747,046, dated Aug. 30, 2021 (32 pgs). |
European Search reported issued in application EP21152057, dated Jul. 2, 2021 (6 pgs). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210220938 A1 | Jul 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16747046 | Jan 2020 | US |
Child | 16921387 | US |