A device for improving the stiffness of the structure of a vehicle, in particular a vehicle with a retractable roof
The present invention concerns a device for reinforcing a vehicle, in particular one equipped with a retractable roof.
It is known that vehicles of the cabriolet type or vehicles with a retractable roof, when the roof elements are stored in the vehicle boot, have stiffness in flexion and torsion, and resistance to lateral impacts, which are reduced compared with those of a vehicle with a non-retractable rigid roof.
This is because the rigid roof, as well as the lateral uprights, significantly participate in the stiffness of the bodywork.
The above problem is posed in particular in the case of vehicles with four doors equipped with a retractable roof.
This is because, in these vehicles, the bottom longitudinal members of the chassis have greater length than in vehicles with two doors and because of this these longitudinal members no longer provide sufficient torsional and flexional strength.
Moreover, in this type of vehicle, the only connection existing between the rear edge of each door and the bodywork is that existing at the single lock.
Naturally, this single lock procures no resistance to twisting forces.
The aim of the present invention is to remedy the above drawbacks.
According to the invention, the device for reinforcing a vehicle, in particular one equipped with a retractable roof, is characterised in that it comprises, between the rear edge of the vehicle door and the adjacent edge of the bodywork of the said vehicle, at least one first element comprising an electromagnet fixed to one of the said edges and, opposite the said electromagnet, at least one second element comprising a magnetic material fixed to the other edge, one of the said first and second elements being able to move towards the other element when the electromagnet is supplied with an electric current, the facing ends of the said elements being shaped so as to be able to fit axially one in the other.
The device preferably comprises at least two first elements each comprising an electromagnet and at least two second elements, disposed on the said facing edges, on each side of the lock which is normally fitted to the said edge of the door.
This arrangement of magnetic locking elements on each side of the central lock creates a rigid connection between the door and the bodywork which improves the resistance of the structure to twisting forces.
Other particularities and advantages of the invention will also emerge from the following description.
In the accompanying drawings, given by way of non-limiting examples:
In the embodiment depicted in
One of the said first and second elements 2, 7 is able to move towards the other element 7, 2 when the electromagnet 2a is supplied with an electric current (see
As shown by
In the example depicted, the device comprises at least two first elements 2, 4 each comprising an electromagnet 2a, 4a and at least two second elements 7, 9 disposed on the said facing edges 1a, 12b on each side of the lock 15 which is normally fitted to the edge 1a of the door.
In addition, in the example depicted, the first elements 2, 4 are secured fixedly to the edge 1a of the door 1 and the second elements 7, 9 are secured slidably to the edge 12b of the bodywork.
In addition, the end of the first elements 2, 4 has a protuberance 2b, 4b1, 4b2 in the form of a truncated cone and the end of the second elements 7, 9 has a cavity with a complementary shape 7b, 9b1, 9b2.
It can also be seen, in particular in
In addition, these second elements 7, 9 are slidably mounted in a reinforcement plate 16a, 16 fixed to the edge 12b of the bodywork.
In the example depicted, the device situated at the bottom part comprises in fact two protuberances 4b1, 4b2 which cooperate with two complementary cavities 9b1, 9b2.
In the example in
These locking means comprise a finger 17 fixed to the end of the movable element 9, able to engage in an opening 18 formed in the end of the fixed element 4 when the ends of these elements 4, 9 are fitted one in the other, as shown by
In the example depicted in
Naturally locking systems other than the one depicted can be used.
Thus the locking system described in French patent application No. 0013242 in the name of the applicant could be used.
The functioning of the device which has just been described will now be explained.
After the door is closed, the electrical supply to the electromagnets 2a, 4a is demanded. The electromagnet field created by the electromagnets attracts the magnetic slugs 7a, 9b of the movable elements 7, 9. The ends 7b, 9b1, 9b2 of these movable ends 7, 9 fit on the protuberances 2b, 4b1, 4b2 of the fixed elements 2, 4, as shown by
By virtue of the locking thus obtained, distributed on each side of the central lock, the door 1 is rigidly connected to the bodywork, which improves the stiffness of the structure.
This stiffness is improved still further by virtue of the supplementary locking depicted in
In order to open the door 1, it suffices to cut off the electrical supply to the electromagnets 2a, 4a. The return springs 8, 10 return the movable elements 7, 9 to the unlocked position.
In the event of impact, a device can be provided for automatically cutting off the electrical supply to the electromagnets 2a, 4a in order to be able to open the door.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
00 15079 | Nov 2000 | FR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/FR01/03668 | 11/21/2001 | WO | 00 | 12/4/2003 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO02/42104 | 5/30/2002 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1958940 | Cavanaugh et al. | May 1934 | A |
2028852 | Vincent | Jan 1936 | A |
2381075 | Nelsen | Aug 1945 | A |
2514927 | Bernhard | Jul 1950 | A |
2565891 | Sherman | Aug 1951 | A |
2586900 | Alderman | Feb 1952 | A |
2659114 | Anderson et al. | Nov 1953 | A |
2694592 | Borchers et al. | Nov 1954 | A |
2727772 | Hamilton | Dec 1955 | A |
2765648 | Hatcher | Oct 1956 | A |
2822203 | Griswold, Jr. et al. | Feb 1958 | A |
2826444 | Kurilenko | Mar 1958 | A |
3247924 | Price | Apr 1966 | A |
3431998 | Martin | Mar 1969 | A |
3468392 | Hass | Sep 1969 | A |
3479767 | Lastinger et al. | Nov 1969 | A |
3516701 | Graham | Jun 1970 | A |
3753316 | Savarieau et al. | Aug 1973 | A |
3830332 | Fontaine | Aug 1974 | A |
4372419 | Barnett et al. | Feb 1983 | A |
4784415 | Malaval | Nov 1988 | A |
4915431 | Bailey | Apr 1990 | A |
4941235 | Aoki | Jul 1990 | A |
5029912 | Gotanda | Jul 1991 | A |
5263347 | Allbaugh et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5386713 | Wilson | Feb 1995 | A |
5588318 | Osborne | Dec 1996 | A |
5727288 | Byon | Mar 1998 | A |
6007119 | Roth et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6260892 | Chang | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6412584 | Faigle et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6561555 | Millard | May 2003 | B1 |
6634684 | Spiessl | Oct 2003 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
4007348 | Feb 1991 | DE |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040070214 A1 | Apr 2004 | US |