The invention relates to a device for inductive transmission of electrical energy. Devices of this kind are used for inductive charging of a rechargeable battery installed in an electric vehicle. During the transmission of energy, a magnetic field of high field strength and flux density is built up between a stationary primary coil and a secondary coil on the vehicle. This is necessary in order to induce a sufficiently high current for the desired transmission power in the secondary coil.
If objects made of metal materials are introduced into the area of such a field, eddy currents are induced in these which lead to heating dependent on the material, time of exposure and level of field strength. In the presence of such conditions, such an object can reach a temperature which can lead to damage, e.g. to melting of plastic surfaces, or to hazards to persons. The latter occur in particular when the secondary side has been removed and heated metal objects are freely accessible and can be touched by persons.
Due to the characteristics of existing applications for inductive energy transmission systems, such a hazard arising from metal foreign bodies was assessed as not being relevant or, for example in the case of industrial trucks (AGV) attempts were made to remove such objects from critical field areas by fitting brushes in front of the secondary consumers. In the case of vehicles with a driver, training can be conducted to draw attention to the need to look out for the presence of such objects while in operation and to ensure that these are removed before the inductive transmission is set in operation, or in the event of any doubt to ensure that the inductive transmission is not set in operation. The existing safety measures appear unsuitable or at least inadequate for largely automatic operation or with higher safety requirements which must be assumed in particular when such systems are used in areas accessible to the public.
From US 2007/0145830 A1 a system for the wireless transmission of electrical power to electronic devices is known, which comprises a plurality of primary coils, thereby eliminating the need for precise alignment of a primary and a secondary coil relative to each other. In this document, the problem of the presence of metallic objects is mentioned, but a metal detector is dismissed as being unusable. Rather, by suitable circuit design it is ensured that the system only enters its resonant state when a resonant circuit comprising a secondary coil and a tuning capacitor connected in parallel approaches the primary side, thereby causing a steep increase of the primary current, which is concentrated on one or a few primary coils immediately near the secondary coil. A conductive object represents no problem in this case, because it does not constitute a resonant circuit.
Therefore, the underlying object of the invention is to improve the operating safety of an inductive energy transmission system with regard to the presence of electrically conducting foreign bodies.
According to the invention, with a device for inductive transmission of electrical energy from a stationary unit with at least one primary inductor to a vehicle standing in the vicinity hereof and having at least one secondary inductor, the stationary unit has a device for detecting the presence of an electrically conducting object within a predetermined space adjoining the primary inductor. Primarily, this means the space lying between the primary inductor and the secondary inductor during the inductive transmission of energy. If the selected range of the detection device is increased, it is also possible to detect the presence of a vehicle in the area of the primary inductor in addition to the presence of conducting foreign bodies in the immediate vicinity of the primary inductor.
Preferably, a sensor is provided operating on an inductive basis, i.e. with an impedance measurement at a measuring inductor, since such as sensor is particularly suitable for discriminating between conducting and non-conducting objects. In the simplest case, the existing primary inductor can be used as the measuring inductor. A higher sensitivity and approximate location of the position of a metal object allows the use of a regular two-dimensional arrangement of a plurality of separate measuring inductors. These can be embodied for example as planar coils which can be manufactured inexpensively in large numbers on a common substrate.
An evaluation device compares the impedance of the measuring inductor or a distribution of the impedances of the individual measuring inductors or groups of measuring inductors with a reference impedance or reference distribution. In the presence of a deviation of a predetermined amount, a signal is produced which indicates the deviation. This signal can be produced on an indicating device and/or used to deactivate the current supply of the primary inductor.
In the following, embodiment examples of the invention are described with reference to the drawings in which:
Some of the field lines 9 of the alternating magnetic field produced by the primary coil 2 while in operation are indicated by the dashed lines in
A metal object 11 lies on the housing 8 of the primary coil 2. This could have become detached from another vehicle which stood in the charging station before the vehicle 1 for example. It could also be an object lost by a person or an empty drinks can. Not least, the object 11 could also have been left there deliberately by a person with the intention of sabotage. As already explained at the start, the object would heat up due to the eddy currents induced in it when current is supplied to the primary coil 2 and thus become a source of danger. Moreover, it would reduce the efficiency of the energy transmission to the secondary coil 4.
How the present invention overcomes this problem is explained below with reference to
The measuring coils 12 form a regular two-dimensional arrangement in the form of a matrix with equal grid spacing in the rows and columns. However, successive rows are in each case offset in relation to one another by half a grid space, so that a higher packing density can be obtained compared with a classic matrix arrangement. In
The measuring coils 12 are in each case connected with an impedance measuring device 13. These impedance measuring devices 13 are connected to a central evaluation device 14. When no energy transmission is taking place, but the charging station is on standby, the measuring coils 12 are supplied with a measuring current of predetermined strength. This produces a measuring field around each measuring coil 12, which produces eddy currents in a metal foreign body 11 lying on the housing 8 over the respective measuring coil. The magnetic reaction of these eddy currents on the measuring coil 12 concerned produces a change in the impedance. The impedance of each measuring coil 12 is measured continuously by the impedance measuring device 13 assigned to it in each case.
The measurement values supplied by the individual impedance measuring devices 13 are continuously compared with one another and when appropriate with a reference value in an evaluation device 14. In the situation illustrated in
As an alternative to assignment of an individual impedance measuring device 13 to each individual measuring coil 12, as shown in
As a further alternative, a plurality of measuring coils 12 or groups of such could be measured with one common impedance measuring device 13 by connecting an analogue multiplexer in series with the impedance measuring device 13. This would mean that even fewer impedance measuring devices 13 would be required, in principle just one. Naturally, multiplex operation would entail multiplication of the time required for complete detection of the impedances of all the measuring coils 12. However, this could still be acceptable as changing a vehicle at a charging station is not a very rapid operation.
Distributing a plurality of measuring coils 12 over the upper side of the housing 8 makes it possible to draw conclusions as to the size and the position of a metal object when the impedances of the measuring coils 12 are measured at least in groups or, as assumed in
Independently of the number of measuring coils 12 and their possible combination in groups, whenever the measured impedance distribution deviates from a stored reference distribution by a predetermined minimum amount, the evaluation device 14 always emits an output signal to an indicating device 15 which emits an optical and/or acoustic warning. Apart from this, the evaluation device 14 is also connected with the control unit 7 of the charging station and emits a signal to the latter which blocks the initiation of energy transmission, i.e. the supply of current to the primary coil 2. If the detected deviation from the specified state persists over an extended period of time, a message is sent to a competent location, e.g. to the operator of the charging station. The transmission of energy can only be set in operation again once the rectification of the faulty state has been confirmed by maintenance personnel.
As the measuring coils 12 are exposed to the strong magnetic field of the primary coil 2 when the inductive energy transmission is in operation, it is imperative to prevent high currents being induced in them as a result. For this, the impedance measuring devices 13 must be switched off before the beginning of the transmission of energy, and the measuring coils 12 must be switched to the open circuit state. To this end, the control unit 7 emits a corresponding signal to the evaluation device 14 which causes the measuring devices 13 to be switched off as indicated, and the measuring coils 12 to be switched to the open circuit state in good time before a primary current is switched on.
In a highly simplified variant compared with the form of embodiment of the invention previously described, the primary coil 2 is used as the single measuring coil. For this, the primary coil 2 is continuously supplied with a minimal current which is sufficient to build up a magnetic field of low strength as a measuring field around the primary coil 2. The impedance of the primary coil 2 is measured continuously by means of a suitable measuring device 16 which is shown by the dashed lines in
It is obvious that when the primary coil 2 is used as the single inductive measuring pickup, only comparatively coarse monitoring of the housing 8 for the presence of a metal foreign body 11 is possible, i.e. that only comparatively larger foreign bodies 11 can be detected reliably with this. Moreover, no conclusion as to the position of the foreign body 11 is possible from a change in the impedance of the primary coil 2, and only a limited conclusion as to its size. For this, the cost of additional hardware is much lower compared to the embodiment with a matrix of separate measuring coils 12 described previously.
In any case, when the strength of the measuring field and its physical extent are determined, it must be noted that it only covers a limited vertical range, for example to approx. 50 mm above the housing 8. This makes it possible to ensure that parking of a vehicle 1 above the housing 8 does not cause a change in the impedance of the measuring coils 12 or misinterpretation by the evaluation unit 14 as indicating the presence of a metallic foreign body 11. In addition, when the field strength of the measuring field is determined, it must be remembered that it must not be sufficient to heat a metal object 11 to such an extent that it could cause damage or danger.
In the case of the form of embodiment described first, the physical distribution of the impedance changes and/or their extent can also be used to detect the presence of a vehicle 1 over the primary coil 2 and differentiate between this and the presence of a metal foreign body 11. For the purposes of the present invention, a vehicle 1 including its secondary coil 4 represents no more than one specific type of metal object. In this case, the measuring field must be designed so that a larger vertical area can be monitored, for example up to approx. 300 mm above the housing 8. In this case, a signal sent by the evaluation device 14 to the control unit 7 indicates whether there is a foreign body 11 or a vehicle 1.
The recognition of a vehicle 1 reported by the evaluation unit 14 can be used by the control unit 7 for example to initiate the energy transmission operation. On the other hand, this can also be used to establish when an attempt is made to park a vehicle 1 not requiring charging in the charging station. In the last-named case, measures can then be taken to prevent the definitive parking of the vehicle 1 and so keep the charging option free for other vehicles which need a charge.
If a sufficient and lasting change in the impedance or impedance distribution is detected indicating the presence of a vehicle 1, contact can be made with the detected vehicle 1 for the purposes of identifying it more closely. This can be carried out for example by requesting a vehicle code by means of a transponder (RFID) or other suitable technical methods. At the same time, the communication with the vehicle is used to check whether and in what form there is a need and entitlement to draw energy at the charging station. When a vehicle is detected which has no need for energy transmission or no entitlement to this, the competent locations have the discretion to react appropriately to eliminate the blockage of the charging station. When a vehicle 1 is detected, but no communication can be established with it, the further action will be as in the case of detection of a foreign body 11.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2009 033 237 | Jul 2009 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2010/059294 | 6/30/2010 | WO | 00 | 3/30/2012 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2011/006758 | 1/20/2011 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4800328 | Bolger et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
5791648 | Hohl | Aug 1998 | A |
5821731 | Kuki et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5850135 | Kuki et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
6954180 | Braun et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
7076206 | Elferich et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7233137 | Nakamura et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7511452 | Bersenev | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7733215 | Kozuma et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7880337 | Farkas | Feb 2011 | B2 |
8064825 | Onishi et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8222991 | Kozuma et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8446251 | Kozuma et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
20020154518 | Elferich et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20060202665 | Hsu | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070139000 | Kozuma et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070145830 | Lee et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20080067874 | Tseng | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080200119 | Onishi et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080265684 | Farkas | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20100225172 | Kozuma et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110163542 | Farkas | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110285210 | Lemmens et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110291491 | Lemmens et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120274151 | Kozuma et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130241288 | Kozuma et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1311269 | Dec 1992 | CA |
3782281 | Mar 1993 | DE |
19915487 | Nov 2000 | DE |
10119283 | Oct 2002 | DE |
69714879 | May 2003 | DE |
10 2007 033 654 | Apr 2008 | DE |
H06105408 | Apr 1994 | JP |
10198494 | Jul 1998 | JP |
10-215530 | Aug 1998 | JP |
2000134830 | May 2000 | JP |
2006149168 | Jun 2006 | JP |
2006246633 | Sep 2006 | JP |
2008017562 | Jan 2008 | JP |
2008206231 | Sep 2008 | JP |
2008032746 | Mar 2008 | WO |
2008051611 | May 2008 | WO |
WO 2008050260 | May 2008 | WO |
2009014125 | Jan 2009 | WO |
2009081115 | Jul 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Written Opinion dated Jan. 14, 2012 for PCT/EP10/59294 filed Jun. 30, 2010. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jan. 17, 2012 for PCT/EP10/59294 filed Jun. 30, 2010. |
International Search Report published Oct. 3, 2011 for PCT/EP2010/059294 filed Jun. 30, 2010. |
English translation of International Preliminary Report on Patentability (IPRP) published Jan. 17, 2012 for International Patent Application No. PCT/EP2010/059294 filed on Jun. 30, 2010. |
English translation of Written Opinion (WO) published Jan. 14, 2012 for International Patent Application No. PCT/EP2010/059294 filed on Jun. 30, 2010. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120181875 A1 | Jul 2012 | US |