This application claims priority to and the benefit of PCT Application No. PCT/EP2010/002849 filed May 12, 2010, which claims priority to and the benefit of German Patent Application No. 10 2009 020 875.5 filed May 12, 2009.
The invention relates to a device for inserting a shut-off device in a pipeline according to the preamble to claim 1.
Shut-off devices for shutting off fluid-conducting pipelines exist in a multitude of embodiments. They can be operated manually or automatically. In automatic operation the closed position is adopted when preset parameters such as an impermissible increase in flow rate or temperature are exceeded. The shut-off devices are normally inserted at the designated places within the pipeline as it is being laid.
An example of these devices is the safety shut-off device for a gas line described in WO 92/01184 A1. As can be seen from
A connecting element which is disposed within the pipelines and into which the shut-off device is inserted can also be used. It is therefore known from the utility model DE 93 19 910 U1 for the shut-off device to be inserted into a so-called electrofusion coupler of the type used for joining plastic pipelines.
The disadvantage of these solutions is that a subsequent installation in a pipeline that has already been laid can only be carried out at very great expense by exposing and cutting the pipeline. Such a level of expenditure is no longer acceptable for pipelines that have already been laid underground.
A shut-off device for gas-conducting pipelines, a so-called gas flow monitor, is described in DE 103 24 041 B4. This gas flow monitor can be installed in a gas line at the optimum location for its safety function and fixed in position there. To that end the gas flow monitor is fastened in a thrust piece which for its part can be screwed in place by a clamping ring. On its side facing away from the expanding ring the clamping ring has spring elastic elements which prevent its turning in the pipeline. In addition, an expanding ring is disposed on the circumference of the thrust piece and is deformed and increases in diameter as the thrust piece is screwed in place by the clamping ring.
The disadvantage of this solution, apart from its complicated structure and the unavoidably high costs of production of the individual components, is that the sealing element is precompressed right at the start of the insertion of the device into the pipeline. Apart from the increased exertion of force over the course of the joining path to the required installation location, the main effect of this precompression is that the sealing element is subjected to a high level of wear, especially if the inner wall is dry. In addition, the spring elastic functional components create notches on the inner wall of the pipeline over the entire joining path owing to the reverse rotation forces that arise during pressing, and this has a long-term effect at the installation location.
The invention addresses the problem of devising a device for inserting a shut-off device in a pipeline which has as simple a structure as possible and is suitable for retrofitting in pipelines that have already been laid. It is intended to be capable of being installed at a position in the pipeline where it can best perform its function and of being fixed in place there. At the same time the device is intended to be transported to the installation location using as little force as necessary and in particular the sealing element is intended to be displaced without contact and thus without wear, while at the same time ensuring that the inner seal between the device and the internal diameter of the pipeline remains intact.
The problem is solved according to the invention in that the device for inserting a shut-off device in a pipeline comprises a tubular housing in whose interior a shut-off device is disposed, and which is designed so that an offset region conically tapering towards the direction of insertion is adjacent to the front cylindrical region of the housing looked at from the direction of insertion whose external diameter is slightly smaller than the internal diameter of the pipeline, with said offset region bounded by a stop collar on which a connecting contour for a coupling piece of a drive element known per se is connected. A sliding piece made of an expandable material whose diameter when lying against the stop collar is slightly smaller than the internal diameter of the pipeline and which comprises a circumferential groove in which a spring-loaded clamping ring is supported, is displaceably disposed in the axial direction on the conically tapering region.
This arrangement provides a solution to the problems referred to above.
Additional advantageous embodiments of the invention are set out in the other claims. The structure can therefore be simplified for example by connecting the housing to the shut-off device in one piece. In this arrangement the shut-off device can comprise for example a gas flow monitor for automatically shutting off gas lines.
Furthermore, it has proved advantageous to taper the diameter of the clamping ring in the direction of insertion in order to facilitate the insertion of the device into the pipeline and its insertion movement within the pipeline.
A further advantageous embodiment can be achieved if the two end regions of the conical region each comprise an additional cylindrical region in order to prevent an axially acting force component being exerted in the two final positions.
The sliding piece can have a second groove in which an O-ring is mounted in order to further ensure that the inner seal between the device and the internal diameter of the pipeline remains intact.
Where an O-ring is used to ensure the inner seal is intact, the force arising on the insertion of the device can be reduced by inserting one or more axial slots on the radial bars on the sliding piece.
The invention is now to be described in more detail by an execution example in which reference will be made to the following illustrations:
The device according to the invention comprises a tubular housing 1 whose external diameter has been so determined that it can be inserted into the pipeline 2. In order to facilitate insertion into the pipeline 2 the cylindrical region 3, which has the largest diameter, is fitted at the starting side with a tapered insertion point 4 in the direction of insertion.
A shut-off device 6, in this case a gas flow monitor, is inserted gastight into a turned recess 5 in the interior of the housing 1. Since the structure and mode of operation of a gas flow monitor are known to those skilled in the art, a further description and explanation of the details of this device have not been given in this execution example.
At its end side looked at from the direction of insertion the housing 1 has a connecting contour, in the execution example a connecting thread 7, for connecting to a coupling piece 20 of the drive element 19 which has already been mentioned above. A bayonet joint or the like can of course also be used depending on the coupling piece.
The external contour of the housing 1 has an offset region 8 at its connection point to the cylindrical region 3. This offset region changes from an initial cylindrical part 9 into a conically tapering region 10 and ends in a second cylindrical part 11.
A sliding piece 13 mounted so as to be axially displaceable on the second cylindrical part 11 and made of an expandable material such as polyethylene rests in the initial state on a stop collar 12 shutting off the offset region 8. On its side facing away from the offset region 8 the stop collar 12 is fitted with a taper 18 to facilitate the mounting of the sliding piece 13 onto the housing 1.
The sliding piece 13 is fitted with two grooves on its surface. Whereas one of the grooves serves to receive an O-ring 14 serving to ensure gas tightness, a slotted metallic clamping ring 15, whose diameter in its sprung back state exceeds the internal diameter of the pipeline 2 and which tapers in the direction of insertion, is spring-mounted in the other groove. The position and parameters of O-ring 14 and clamping ring 15 that are selected are such that the sealing effect of the O-ring is not impaired by the clamping ring 15 in the installed condition shown in
The installation and mode of operation of the device for inserting a shut-off device in a pipeline described in this execution example are as follows:
The device shown in the execution example in
After the installation location has been reached, a tensile force is exerted against the direction of insertion to fix the position of the device by means of the flexible shaft.
The tensile force exerted causes the clamping ring 15 to be pressed onto or into the wall of the pipeline depending on the material from which the pipeline 2 is made so that the sliding piece 13 is held in a stationary position. The conical region 10 slides under the sliding piece 13 and leads to an expansion of said sliding piece until the sliding piece 13 is located on the first cylindrical part 9. This expansion causes the O-ring 14 as well to be pressed onto the inner wall to provide the required seal, with the slots 17 distributed over the circumference of the bars (16) serving to reduce the force expended during the expansion.
The coupling piece is then released from the device, an operation which is effected in this case by a rotational movement, and the flexible shaft is conveyed outwards with the coupling piece. This operation concludes the installation in the pipeline 2.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2009 020 875 | May 2009 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2010/002849 | 5/10/2010 | WO | 00 | 11/11/2011 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2010/130387 | 11/18/2010 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1647873 | Lockwood | Nov 1927 | A |
2333470 | Cowles | Nov 1943 | A |
2771091 | Baker et al. | Nov 1956 | A |
2802482 | Arnhold | Aug 1957 | A |
3180420 | Manson, Jr. et al. | Apr 1965 | A |
3419040 | Thibodeaux | Dec 1968 | A |
3893716 | Moreiras et al. | Jul 1975 | A |
5293898 | Masloff | Mar 1994 | A |
5755259 | Schulze et al. | May 1998 | A |
6892756 | Schulze | May 2005 | B2 |
6929023 | Whitaker et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7389791 | Fangmeier | Jun 2008 | B2 |
8056574 | Erickson et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
20080210310 | Gilcher | Sep 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
9319910 | Mar 1994 | DE |
20116899 | Dec 2001 | DE |
10115676 | Oct 2002 | DE |
10324041 | Jan 2005 | DE |
202005001685 | May 2005 | DE |
1299876 | Dec 1972 | GB |
WO9201184 | Jan 1992 | WO |
Entry |
---|
English language abstract not available for DE 9319910; however, see English language equivalent US 5,755,259. Orginial document extracted from the espacenet.com database, 10 pages, Mar. 24, 1994. |
English language abstract not available for DE 20116899; however, see English language machine-assisted translation extracted from the espacenet.com database on Aug. 10, 2012, 22 pages. |
English language abstract and machine-assisted translation for DE 10115676 extracted from the espacenet.com database on Aug. 10, 2012, 8 pages. |
English language abstract and machine-assisted translation for DE 10324041 extracted from the espacenet.com database on Aug. 10, 2012, 14 pages. |
English language abstract and machine-assisted translation for DE 202005001685 extracted from the espacenet.com database on Aug. 10, 2012, 13 pages. |
English language abstract for WO9201184 extracted from the espacenet.com database on Aug. 10, 2012, 35 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120048395 A1 | Mar 2012 | US |