The invention concerns a device for loading the guide surfaces of bearing chocks supported in the housing windows of rolling stands with pressure plates that can be placed on the guide surfaces and that are loaded by hydraulic piston-cylinder units installed in the rolling stand housings. Devices of this type are disclosed, for example, in EP 1 036 605 and EP 1 281 449, in which the hydraulic piston-cylinder units are installed in recesses of the rolling stand housing, and each cylinder-piston supports a pressure plate on its end face that faces the housing window and the given lateral guide surface of the bearing chocks. This device makes it possible, by varying the hydraulic pressure loading of the piston, to produce well-defined contact forces and thus frictional forces on the bearing chocks while bridging the working clearance, i.e., to predetermine well-defined contact forces and frictional forces, independently of the rolling conditions. As described in the above-cited document EP Patent 1 036 605, the contact forces give rise to frictional forces, which have the same line of action as the rolling force. Even when the contact forces are held constant, there is no guarantee that the frictional forces also remain constant, because the coefficient of friction between the contact surfaces of the bearing chocks and the housing window changes due to the changes in the surface quality. The surface of the contact surfaces becomes rougher due to corrosion, cooling water, or other abrasive substances. The coefficient of friction rises, and therefore the frictional forces T also rise and thus can be determined only inexactly. Regardless of whether the frictional forces can be determined or not, they have an adverse effect on the ability to regulate or automatically control the rolling stands. Consequently, the rolling force acting directly in the roll gap cannot be exactly determined. However, the current strip thickness in the roll gap can be computed by the gage control equation only from this force that acts directly in the roll gap. As a result, the strip thickness tolerances and strip flatness tolerances are difficult to maintain. The design solution according to the documents cited above also does not make it possible to determine where the center planes of the bearing chocks in the housing window are located with respect to a fixed plane and how the position of the center planes varies relative to this fixed plane. This deficiency also means that unintended crossing of the rolls relative to one other cannot be determined.
The objective of the invention is to eliminate these disadvantages that impair the rolling process. This objective is achieved by assigning pressure-measuring and position-measuring devices that can be controlled by automatic controlling devices to each hydraulic cylinder. These automatic controls can operate in such a way that the piston maintains a predetermined position regardless of the force acting on it or in such a way that at a certain force acting on the piston, the piston is displaced and enters a different, specific position. The automatic controls can also operate in such a way that the bearing chock is pressed against a fixed side of the housing window with a certain force. The displacement sensor then shows no further changes. If the piston of the cylinder is then moved a predetermined amount in the opposite direction, then a well-defined clearance of the bearing chocks in the housing window will be established. This type of clearance adjustment can compensate the production tolerances of the different bearing chocks, the wear, and the housing constriction due to the rolling forces to be expected. As the result of the adjustment of optimum clearance, no contact forces of the piston come into play, and no frictional forces are produced which have a negative effect on the automatic controllability of the process.
With the position of the housing window sides known, the position of the bearing chocks relative to a selected plane can be determined by the pressing and simultaneous measurement of the piston stroke made on the drive side and on the tending side of the rolls. If this position measurement is compared with previously stored position measurements, the wear on the housing windows and their mounting parts can be determined. If, as described, the piston is installed in such a way that two pistons are present per roll and they press against a fixed surface via the bearing chocks, the crossing of the rolls can be determined in this way. Evaluation of the measured values makes it possible to determine the position of all of the rolls relative to one another. If a piston is provided for each bearing chock on each side, the run-in side and runout side and the drive side and tending side, the rolls can be systematically crossed relative to one another by means of this position measurement. For example, the upper work roll and the upper backup roll can be set parallel to each other and crossed with respect to the lower work roll and the lower backup roll, which are themselves set parallel to each other. This crossing of the upper roll relative to the lower roll can then be used to influence the profile and flatness. With the use of this integrated position measurement, which measures directly in or on the moving members, the rolls can be exactly positioned.
The invention is explained in greater detail with reference to the specific embodiments illustrated in the drawings.
As
In the design according to
In accordance with the control diagram in
The rolling stand designs according to both
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2005 026 257 | Jun 2005 | DE | national |
10 2005 042 168 | Sep 2005 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2006/005485 | 6/8/2006 | WO | 00 | 12/8/2006 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2006/131361 | 12/14/2006 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3302435 | Lyle et al. | Feb 1967 | A |
3795124 | Diolot | Mar 1974 | A |
4116028 | Okamoto et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
4487044 | Fapiano | Dec 1984 | A |
4570472 | Kuwano | Feb 1986 | A |
5029400 | Leclercq et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5448901 | Yu et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5768927 | Kajiwara et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
6354128 | Donini et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6510721 | Yamamoto et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
7111486 | Figge | Sep 2006 | B2 |
20030024292 | Yamamoto et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 036 605 | Sep 2000 | EP |
0247836 | Jun 2002 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070245794 A1 | Oct 2007 | US |