Patent Grant
10228226
This application claims priority to DE 10 2015 010 855.7 filed Aug. 18, 2015, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein.
The disclosure herein relates to a device for monitoring the initiation of a munitions system, comprising at least one sensor in the region of the explosive charge and/or in the region of at least one ignition device for the explosive charge of the munitions system, and to a control device for evaluating the sensor output signals that is connected to at least one ignition device in a controlling manner on the basis of the evaluation.
For flexible control of the power delivery, there have already been proposals for scalable munitions system concepts, the compact ignition system of which combines two ignition circuits and two pyrotechnic outputs, which may be linked with a timing control. Consequently, various active modes can be realized, from controlled deflagration as the minimum effect through time-delayed, combined reaction mechanisms as intermediate effects to classic detonation with the maximum effect. This spatial combination of deflagrator and detonator in a compact ignition system provides numerous practical and operational advantages.
There are already known sensors that can sense and evaluate the progression of a deflagration front in the explosive charge of such a munitions system. DE 10 2012 006 044 B3 describes such a method and a device suitable for it, with the aid of which, after the initiation of a deflagration of the explosive charge, the ignition time of a further ignition chain can also be determined.
Use of such a munitions system means that the ignition system has to meet specific requirements in order to ensure with high functional reliability when choosing a subdetonative mode of action that at least the explosive charge does not undergo a stronger reaction than that chosen. This is the case for example if the deflagrator ignition circuit fails or, for other reasons, the initiation of the deflagration reaction does not take place and the time-delayed detonator ignition circuit initiates the detonative reaction of the explosive charge. This would then lead to the maximum power delivery, or at least to a greater power delivery than is intended. This would have the consequence that some troops in the vicinity would be put at risk or there would be unintentional collateral damage to noncombatants or buildings.
Less critical here are cases in which the detonator ignition circuit fails, which has a minimal effect, or if both ignition circuits fail. While the first case is likely to be acceptable from an operational viewpoint, the latter case results in an explosive charge that is left unexploded. In order to minimize the probability of such an event occurring, allowance has been made for this in the past by the design of the ignition system and appropriate choice of components. Moreover, in principle this should be preferred in practice, rather than a higher power delivery than intended.
The present disclosure is therefore based on an object of increasing the functional reliability of the ignition system after failure of a subdetonative reaction, such as for example a deflagration, to occur in comparison with that previously known with the aid of suitable measures.
This object is achieved at least in part or in whole according to the disclosure herein by at least one sensor being arranged at the output of a first ignition device for the subdetonative initiation of the explosive charge, by the control device being connected to a further ignition device and enabling or inhibiting the latter on the basis of the signal supplied by the sensor and assessed in the control device, and by at least one sensor being designed for sensing pressure, temperature, light, electrical current or the changing of mechanical states.
Further embodiments of the device according to the disclosure herein are described in the further dependent claims.
The advantages of the proposal are that the functional reliability of the ignition system can be influenced both by way of circuitry and also by suitable selection of the electrical components and the one-shot devices such as detonators and EFIs (Exploding Foil Initiators). In the case of a compact ignition system with two ignition circuits, this gives rise to further measures for suppressing the triggering of the detonator in the event of failure of the deflagrator, and consequently failure of the deflagration initiation, to occur. Apart from the failure of the deflagration of the munitions charge to occur, premature detonation could also lead to delivery of a stronger output power. However, the measures that are described below are concentrated primarily on the first case.
Measures that may contribute to this are those such as the switching of the minimum mode as a standard setting after arming of the ignition system, a redundant design of the deflagrator with high-voltage ignition circuits and pyrotechnic outputs or else a spatial separation of the high-voltage ignition circuits of the deflagrator and the detonator.
It is also presupposed that suitable measures are taken to prevent a sympathetic initiation and/or electrical triggering between the deflagrator and the detonator. This may take place by the design of the ignition system and suitable selection of the material for corresponding barriers for shock absorption. The risk of electrical crosstalk can be reduced in terms of circuitry by isolation of the electrical energy supply and by ground connections and also isolators such as optocouplers between the low-voltage part and the high-voltage part of the ignition system.
On the other hand, a sensor which detects the pyrotechnic event of the deflagrative reaction of the explosive charge on the basis of suitable physical variables may lead to a further improvement in the reliability of the ignition system and the munitions part. By linking the sensor with the control unit of the ignition system, in which there is also the time control logic for the modes of action, the detonator is only enabled and triggered after positive detection of the deflagration event.
Pressure, temperature, optical or electrical sensors or sensors that detect the change in mechanical states may be used as the measuring device. These sensors may also be combined with a venting channel for pressure relief after initiation of the subdetonative reaction.
The measuring device can be advantageously combined with the sensors in such a way that the high-voltage circuit for the detonator is only armed and supplied with voltage once the deflagration event has been positively sensed. The high-voltage ignition circuits for the deflagrator and the detonator may also be interconnected with the high-voltage converter in a master-slave arrangement.
Such measures finally allow the functional reliability to be increased in order to prevent a higher power delivery of the munitions system than originally chosen or intended. They also offer the advantage that they can be performed either directly in or in the vicinity of the ignition system.
An exemplary embodiment of the disclosure herein is presented in the figures of the drawing and is described in more detail below. In the drawing:
In
The control device ZS-ST performs various tasks in the sense of safe ignition triggering or reducing the risks in the event of a malfunction in the subdetonative initiation of the explosive charge.
On the one hand, the time-controlled distribution of electrical energy in the form of low voltage and high voltage for supplying the subassemblies is carried out here. On the other hand, control signals are sent from here to all of the subassemblies involved and the responses received from them are evaluated.
In the control device ZS-ST, the output signal of the sensor ZK-A-U that monitors the function of the first ignition chain ZK-A is evaluated. Only when the satisfactory function of this ignition chain is confirmed does the control device generate an enabling signal for the further ignition system ZS-B and the further ignition chain ZK-B. If one of the subassemblies fails with a malfunction, the detonative initiation of the explosive charge is consequently prevented.
The diagram in
To relieve the pressure during the initiation, arranged around the centrally arranged subassemblies are venting channels, which on the right-hand side discharge into the open environment. Placed there by way of example was the sensor ZS-A-U which detects the proper functioning of the ignition chain ZK-A and reports this to the control unit ZS-ST. Only then are the second ignition system ZS-B and the associated ignition chain ZK-B enabled.
While at least one exemplary embodiment of the present invention(s) is disclosed herein, it should be understood that modifications, substitutions and alternatives may be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art and can be made without departing from the scope of this disclosure. This disclosure is intended to cover any adaptations or variations of the exemplary embodiment(s). In addition, in this disclosure, the terms “comprise” or “comprising” do not exclude other elements or steps, the terms “a”, “an” or “one” do not exclude a plural number, and the term “or” means either or both. Furthermore, characteristics or steps which have been described may also be used in combination with other characteristics or steps and in any order unless the disclosure or context suggests otherwise. This disclosure hereby incorporates by reference the complete disclosure of any patent or application from which it claims benefit or priority.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 2015 010 855 | Aug 2015 | DE | national |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3717098 | Davis et al. | Feb 1973 | A |
| 4815385 | Kingery et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
| 6269746 | Larsen | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 7891297 | Rohr | Feb 2011 | B1 |
| 8931415 | Volkmann | Jan 2015 | B2 |
| 9273939 | Ackermann | Mar 2016 | B2 |
| 20100031841 | Michel | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20120012019 | Harding | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120227609 | Volkmann | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20150345915 | Ackermann | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 10 2012 006 044 | Mar 2013 | DE |
| 10 2014 004 003 | Oct 2014 | DE |
| 10 2013 011 404 | Mar 2015 | DE |
| 2 789 965 | Oct 2014 | EP |
| 2 824 414 | Jan 2015 | EP |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20170184385 A1 | Jun 2017 | US |
