The present invention relates to a device for moving a runner of a shaft furnace and in particular to a device for use in the replacement operation of a blast furnace main runner.
During tapping, pig iron and pig iron slag are separated in a main runner also called main trough. Such main runners have large cross sections and are consequently of considerable size and weight. In general, several runner elements, such as tilting runners and discharge runners, are connected down-stream of the main runner.
In the case of normal operation of a blast furnace, the pig iron is tapped off at regular intervals. Depending on the production capacity, their frequency may vary between eight and twelve tappings over twenty-four hours. As a result of the order of several thousand tons of pig iron being discharged each day, the refractory lining of the main runner is subjected to considerable mechanical and thermal loads. This results in wear, which means that refurbishment work has to be carried out periodically on the main runner. This refurbishment work cannot normally be carried out on site within the normal time frame of a programmed shutdown of the blast furnace. This is the reason why the main runner is in general entirely replaced with a reserve runner refurbished beforehand.
A known approach for carrying out this replacement operation is to use a crane, generally available in the cast house. However, given that the mass of the main runner and its accessories is generally of the order of several hundred tons, the necessary support structure for the crane is often very expensive. Since the dimensions of the main runner may be up to 20 m in length, 3 m in width and 2 m in height, the necessary storage space is generally not available in the cast house. Handling such masses using a crane also involves substantial safety risks. Another known solution is to raise the main runner vertically from the ground floor of the factory up to a tapping floor by means of a special device.
This is accomplished in EP 0 279 165 by vertical traction elements, which are flexible or rigid and are fixed to the tapping floor or alternatively to the runner. A similar approach is described in DE 36 24 266 in which the lifting is accomplished by rigid lifting elements placed on the ground floor of the factory. Thus, the rest of the transporting of the replacement runner may be performed on a special vehicle. While these latter solutions allow to reduce the duration of the intervention work and require little constructive space, they do have some drawbacks. Their mechanical construction for example, especially the actuating means, must meet stringent requirements as regards lifting the masses in question. Moreover, both of these known devices have only limited mechanical stability. With the device known from EP 0 279 165, there is a risk of dropping and/or tilting the runner in case of failure of one of the actuating means or in case of rupture of one of the traction elements. Similarly, with the device known from DE 36 24 266, if one of the lifting elements buckles under its pressure load or one of the synchronization gears is jammed, the runner may tilt and/or drop. These solutions therefore entail considerable safety risks, especially when moving the runner.
The object of the present invention is to propose an improved device for moving a runner, which more particularly warrants safety of operation and has improved mechanical stability.
This objective is achieved by a device, according to the invention, for moving a runner of a shaft furnace between an upper tapping floor level, where the runner is in an operational position in front of a taphole of the furnace, and a lower service level, where the runner is accessible for replacement. The device comprises a first support and a second support forming a base member, a carrier member for bearing the runners the carrier member having a first and a second longitudinal portion, a first lifting member connected via a first articulation to the first longitudinal portion and via a second articulation to the first support, and a second lifting member connected via a third articulation to the second longitudinal portion and via a fourth articulation to the second support. The first and second supports, the carrier member and the first and second lifting members together with the four articulations form a four-bar equivalent mechanism. According to the invention, the device further comprises a traction link connected via a fifth articulation to the first lifting member and via a sixth articulation to the second lifting member, the device being arranged such that the axes of rotation of the fifth and sixth articulations remain above the plane defined by the axes of rotation of the second and fourth articulations when the carrier member is in a lower position reached by approaching, taking or traversing a position in which the axes of rotation of the first, second, third and fourth articulations are horizontally aligned.
The links of the four-bar equivalent mechanism are formed by the base member (frame or fixed link), the carrier member (coupler link) and the first and second lifting members (side links), while the joints are formed by the respective articulations there between. Accordingly, the articulations provide at least a rotational degree of freedom around parallel axes. In other words, each articulation comprises at least one revolute joint. The different rigid members together with the articulations form a closed chain providing stability in the longitudinal direction of the device, whereas the lateral dimension of the respective members and articulations provides lateral stability. As will be appreciated, a four-bar equivalent mechanism (or four bar linkage) as described above provides a particularly stable construction, which is mechanically simple and reliable.
In other technical fields, where the loads are usually less heavy, e.g. the field of workshop tools, lifting mechanisms based on the principle of the four bar linkage in general and on the parallelogram linkage in particular are well known. Such devices allow loads to be lifted and lowered with minimized risk of tilting or rolling off of the load during movement. Examples of such lifting devices are illustrated in U.S. Pat. No. 2,340,764, U.S. Pat. No. 2,922,533 and GB 975 154.
U.S. Pat. No. 2,922,533 discloses a hydraulic pipe lift for handling heavy pipes, which is based on a parallelogram linkage. This device comprises a base (frame or fixed link) and a platform (coupler link) connected to the base by means of a first pair of links (side link) and a parallel second pair of links (side link), both pairs being pivoted at the base and at the platform. A significant drawback in the device according to U.S. Pat. No. 2,922,533 is that it cannot be brought into a fully lowered or collapsed position in which the platform is lowered close to the base.
For the present application and for many other applications, it is however desirable that the load be lowered as far as possible. In other words, it should be possible to lower the link that bears the load (coupler link) as far as possible. With a four-bar mechanism, this implies that the mechanism approaches, reaches or traverses a configuration in which the centrelines of all four links of the mechanism become collinear, i.e. a position in which the axes of rotation of the four corresponding articulations are horizontally aligned. This configuration (also called change point or geometric lock) is problematic because the mechanism can toggle and force transmission becomes critical. In fact, when a first side link becomes aligned with the coupler link, the former can only be compressed or extended by the latter. In this configuration, a torque applied to the second side link cannot induce rotation in the first side link. The first link is therefore said to be at a dead point (sometimes called a toggle point). Force transmission can also become critical in a configuration near the change point, because very high torques/forces may be required at the actuated side link(s) to lift the coupler link. Obviously, the latter issue is not facilitated with heavier loads, such as blast furnace runners, on the coupler link.
One possibility to avoid the change point problem is of course to provide redundant actuating means on all side links. This approach is illustrated by U.S. Pat. No. 2,340,764, which discloses a lifting device for objects such as automotive vehicles. This device also comprises a base (fixed link) and a platform (coupler link) connected by parallel bars (side links) pivoted at the base and at the platform. In order to enable unproblematic lifting of the platform from a lower-most configuration in which the platform rests on the base, i.e. a configuration near the change point, a separate actuator is provided on each of the lifting bars.
Under certain circumstances, the latter solution is not viable because there is a requirement to actuate only one of the side links of the device, e.g. because of constructional or cost constraints. GB 975 154 describes one possible design of a lifting device operating with a single actuator and allowing collapsing of the four-bar mechanism into a configuration near the change point. The lifting apparatus according to GB 975 154 comprises a supporting platform linked to a base by means of a parallelogram linkage mechanism. A fluid operated ram for raising the platform is provided. This ram has a lever connected to its plunger. The lever is connected to one side link only. The lever is configured such that it can impart an initial upwardly directed propulsion force on the parallelogram linkage mechanism to initiate lifting and subsequently to impart an upwardly directed traction force the parallelogram linkage mechanism to complete the elevation of the platform. The linkage design according to GB 975 154 is relatively complex, among others because it is designed for lifting and lowering the platform in vertical direction only. In the design according to GB 975 154, an additional bearing and an additional roller are required for coupling the lever to the linkage and for providing initial support respectively. Without using expensive wear parts, e.g. the roller and the bearing, this device is not suitable for lifting very heavy loads. Moreover, the design according to GB 975 154 does not allow for a configuration to be taken in which the change point has been traversed. In fact, when the side links pass through the change point during lowering, the torque exerted by the first actuated side link on the second non-actuated side link is reversed, i.e. has opposite sense. In consequence, lifting the load out of such a configuration beyond the change point is not possible with the device according to GB 975 154.
Turning back to the field of maneuvering shaft furnace runners and the device according to the present invention, it will be appreciated that the traction link according to the invention provides a simple and economical alternative for resolving the aforementioned change point problem without requiring redundant actuators. Furthermore, the traction link allows collapsing the mechanism into a configuration beyond the change point, without causing negative torque at the non-actuated lifting member. By virtue of the traction link the mechanism can take or traverse the change point configuration. Hence it is possible to achieve a comparatively flat construction when the device is collapsed, despite the massive members of considerable dimensions needed for supporting the heavy loads involved with shaft furnace runners. It is also possible to lower the carrier member onto the service floor. By allowing the carrier member to rest on the service floor when lowered, the other members of the device are in no-load condition in this position. In addition, the device can be installed directly onto the service level floor.
In a preferred embodiment, the four-bar equivalent mechanism is a parallelogram four-bar equivalent mechanism. Constraining the motion of the carrier member to (horizontal) planes parallel to the base member, insures a horizontal orientation of the runner throughout the operation of the device, even in case of failure of an actuation means.
When allowing alignment or a configuration close to alignment of the first, second, third and fourth articulations, either the first articulation or the third articulation preferably provides an additional translational degree of freedom in the direction of an axis that is perpendicular to the axes of rotation of the first and third articulations, e.g. by means of a turning and sliding joint. This allows to eliminate transmission of tensile or compressive forces through the carrier member during the lifting and lowering operations.
The above measures allow for driving only a single member of the device without creating critical situations regarding force transmission. With these measures, the four-bar equivalent mechanism is preferably actuated by means of at least one, preferably two hydraulic cylinders driving the first lifting member. Although it is possible to use a single cylinder only, a second cylinder on the first lifting member provides redundancy for safety reasons. In this case, each cylinder is preferably designed for supporting the entire load of the device during operation.
Preferably, the first lifting member is designed as a U-shaped element so as to provide additional lateral stability to the device. Furthermore, the second lifting member advantageously comprises a first arm and a second arm disposed on either side of the carrier member.
In a simple and preferred design, the traction link comprises two drawbars, one drawbar being laterally jointed to either side of the first lifting member and to the first arm or the second arm respectively. Although a non-rigid traction link e.g. made of steel cables could be used, rigid drawbars are preferred inter alia for safety reasons.
In order to allow for removal of the device, the device advantageously comprises at least one detachable articulation and/or at least one detachable support. To facilitate such removal, the carrier member can comprise a plurality of hydraulic lifting jacks. Such lifting jacks allow to place at least part of the device onto a truck or railway wagon. This is advantageous if the device is to be used at a plurality of locations or if it constitutes an obstruction on the service floor, e.g. for torpedo ladle cars.
In a preferred embodiment, the runner is placed on a carriage which is longitudinally movable along the carrier member. A carriage acts as container structure for the runner and significantly facilitates the replacement operation of the runner. When using a carriage, the device preferably comprises means for communicating longitudinal motion to the carriage. This allows to position the carriage on the carrier member, e.g. in order to avoid obstacles during lifting and lowering or to place the carriage on supporting elements of the tapping floor ceiling. The carrier member may comprise a plurality of rollers supporting the carriage. Mounting the rollers on the carrier member avoids the necessity to provide rollers on all carriages. Such rollers are preferably spring supported in order to insure uniform wear and load distribution on the rollers by compensation for inevitable dimensional tolerances in the device and/or the carriage construction. As will be appreciated, the device according to the invention is particularly suitable for use of in the replacement operation of a blast furnace main runner.
The present invention will be more apparent from the following description of a preferred embodiment with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein:
As further seen in
A third hydraulic cylinder 54 is pivotably connected to the carriage 14 and to the second longitudinal portion of the carrier member 20. The third hydraulic cylinder 54 allows to position the carriage 14 longitudinally with respect to the carrier member 20. Referring to
Similarly,
Turning back to the parallelogram four-bar equivalent mechanism,
The function of the traction link 90 will be more apparent from
In order to overcome this (change point) problem, the traction link 90 provides an alternative force transmission path. Greek letter β indicates the angle included between a horizontal line through the second articulation 30 and the line connecting the second articulation 30 to the fifth articulation 92 in
β>>0
is assured, a sufficient lever arm at the third articulation 32, which results in a sufficient positive torque M2 at the fourth articulation 36, can be obtained even with the angle α approaching or taking a zero value or being negative. As a result, the device 10 can be brought into and out of a lowered position as shown in
In presence of the traction link 90, it is undesirable to transmit tensile or compressive forces through the carrier member 20 in order to create the torque M2. In order to eliminate such undesirable forces, the third articulation 32 comprises two turning and sliding joints 98 as shown in
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
91 134 | Jan 2005 | LU | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP06/50524 | 1/30/2006 | WO | 00 | 11/15/2007 |