The suprachoroidal space is a potential space in the eye that is located between the choroid, which is the middle layer or vascular tunic of the eye, and the sclera, the outer (white) layer of the eye. The suprachoroidal space extends from the anterior portion of the eye near the ciliary body to the posterior end of the eye adjacent to the optic nerve. Normally the suprachoroidal space is not evident due to the close apposition of the choroid to the sclera from the intraocular pressure of the eye. Since there is no substantial attachment of the choroid to the sclera, the tissues can separate to form the suprachoroidal space when fluid accumulation or other conditions occur. The suprachoroidal space provides a potential route of access from the anterior region of the eye to the posterior region for the delivery of treatments for diseases of the eye. Standard surgical access to the suprachoroidal space is achieved through incisions in the conjunctiva and the sclera, and is primarily performed in an operating room. Surgical access is useful in draining choroidal effusions or hemorrhage, and in placing microcatheters and cannulas into the suprachoroidal space for delivery of agents to the back of the eye. Treatments for diseases such as age-related macular degeneration, macular edema, diabetic retinopathy and uveitis may be treated by the appropriate active agent administered in the suprachoroidal space.
The sub-retinal space is a potential space in the eye that is located between the sensory retina and the choroid. The sub-retinal space lies under all portions of the retina, from the macular region near the posterior pole to the ora serrata, the anterior border of the retina. Normally the sub-retinal space is not evident as the retina needs to be apposed to the underlying choroid for normal health and function. In some disease states or as a result of trauma, a retinal detachment may occur, forming a fluid filled region in the sub-retinal space. Such spaces normally require treatment to reattach the retina before retinal function is irreversibly lost. However, it has been found that some treatments such as gene therapy or cell therapeutics may be applied to the sub-retinal space to provide maximum exposure to the retina. In a normally functioning retina, small injections in the sub-retinal space create a small area of retinal detachment which resolves in a short period of time, allowing direct treatment of the retina.
The sub-retinal space may be accessed ab-interno by piercing a small gauge needle through the retina. This procedure involves penetration of the intraocular space of the eye and forming a small retinotomy by the needle. A therapeutic agent injected into the sub-retinal space may flow out through the retinotomy into the vitreous cavity causing exposure of the therapeutic to the lens, ciliary body and cornea as it exits through the anterior aqueous outflow pathway.
It is desired to have a method whereby the suprachoroidal space or the sub-retinal space may be accessed in a minimally invasive method via an ab-externo transconjunctival approach. Such a method would provide a method to limit, guide or guard the penetration of a needle device into the suprachoroidal space or sub-retinal space to prevent further penetration. The present invention provides an apparatus to allow minimally invasive, transconjunctival access to the suprachoroidal space or sub-retinal space in the eye for the delivery of therapeutic or diagnostic materials.
The present invention provides a device comprising an elongated body having a distal end and proximal end, said ends in communication through an internal pathway within the body wherein:
the distal end is configured with a sharp edge or point to penetrate into ocular tissues of the outer shell of the eye,
a moveable guarding element disposed in a first configuration to shield the ocular tissues from the sharp edge or point, and adapted to apply a distally directed force to the tissues at the distal end of the device to displace tissue away from the distal end of the device upon entry into the suprachoroidal space or subretinal space in an eye with the distal end; wherein the guarding element is moveable to a second configuration to expose said sharp edge or point to said tissues for penetration into the tissues,
and an access port to deliver materials and substances through the pathway in the elongated body after deployment of the guarding element within the suprachoroidal space or subretinal space.
In some embodiments the guarding element is attached to a spring or compressible element that upon compression thereof provides a distally directed force on the guarding element.
In some embodiments the guarding element comprises a flowable material selected from a fluid or gas that is directed to flow out of the distal end of the device to provide a distally directed force.
In some embodiments the device further comprises a sealing element attached at the distal end of the elongated body adapted to reduce or prevent leakage of fluid or gas through a tissue tract created by the device.
In some embodiments the device accommodates a spring to apply a distal force on the sealing element to provide a sealing force of the element against the eye tissue.
In some embodiments the device comprises a reservoir at the proximal end for receiving a material to be delivered at the target space and the sealing element is in mechanical communication with an activating element for releasing the material from the reservoir.
In some embodiments the device comprises an associated sealing element adapted for retention on the surface of the eye to receive the distal end of the device to locate and stabilize the device during penetration into the eye.
The invention further provides a device for placement in the sclera of an eye, comprising a body having a proximal end adapted for location at or near the scleral surface and a distal end adapted for location within the suprachoroidal or subretinal space, where the device comprises a lumen and a mechanical stop at the proximal end for retaining the proximal end at or near the scleral surface.
Methods of using the devices of the invention to access the suprachoroidal or subretinal spaces of the eye are also provided.
The present invention provides methods and devices to access the suprachoroidal space or sub-retinal space in an eye via a minimally invasive transconjunctival approach to eliminate the need for dissection and subsequent suture closure of the dissection. The devices may also be used after a partial dissection, for example after dissection of the outer scleral layer of the eye, whereby the device is used within the dissection to access the suprachoroidal space or the sub-retinal space. Specifically, the invention provides devices that advantageously may be used in an operating room- or treatment room based setting, to allow for the delivery of substances to the suprachoroidal space or sub-retinal space. Of particular utility is the use of the device to deliver drugs or drug containing materials which provide sustained availability of the drug to the eye. Drugs injected with the device to the suprachoroidal space are useful for treating the choroid and through the vasculature of the choroid, the inner tissues of the eye. Drugs injected with the device to the sub-retinal space are useful for treating the retinal pigment epithelia and the sensory retina. Some examples include polymer drug release materials in the form of injectable filaments or microspheres, or drugs with limited solubility that would provide slow release of drug to the eye. Limited solubility steroids such as triamcinolone acetonide or loteprednol etabonate are steroids which may be injected into the suprachoroidal in a suspension formulation.
The devices comprise an elongated body with a distal and a proximal ends, where the device is held by the operator at the proximal end. The distal end may be configured to penetrate the conjunctiva and the sclera, but not the choroid to access the suprachoroidal space. Alternatively, the distal end may be configured to penetrate the conjunctiva, sclera, and the choroid but not the retina to access the sub-retinal space. The device may contain substances to be delivered through the distal end once placed into the suprachoroidal or sub-retinal spaces. Alternatively, the proximal end may be configured to receive apparatus for the delivery of substances such as a syringe. The devices may also be adapted to place a thin-walled sleeve, as a port or introducer, into the suprachoroidal space or sub-retinal space to allow for subsequent placement and advancement of cannulae or catheters.
In certain preferred embodiments, the device is adapted to limit penetration depth and/or to safely displace the choroid or retina away from the overlying tissue, thereby allowing the distal tip to penetrate into the suprachoroidal space or sub-retinal space, but preventing the distal tip from penetrating or causing damage to the choroid or retina itself. Displacement-limiting or guarding elements may be provided through mechanical or fluidic mechanisms to provide a forward (distally) directed force to the tissues in the eye at the distal tip of the device. The guarding elements may be self-activated by the device or manually activated by the surgeon at the appropriate time. In conjunction with a fluidic mechanism acting as a guarding element, the device may incorporate a sealing element directed at the site of penetration of the eye to prevent leakage of the fluidic element that might cause undesired reduction of the degree of intended displacement of the underlying choroid or retina.
As shown in
In one embodiment (
In another embodiment (
Referring to
In another embodiment, the guard may comprise a flowable or fluidic guard, composed of either a fluid or gas, which is delivered through the distal end of the device to provide a forward directed force and displace the choroid as the device distal tip enters the suprachoroidal space or the displacement of the retina as the distal tip enters the sub-retinal space. The guard may comprise a fluid, such as sterile water, saline, balanced salt solution, silicone oil, surgical viscoelastic, polymer solution or an ophthalmically acceptable perfluorocarbon fluid such as perfluoro-n-octane. Alternately, the guard may comprise a gas, such as air, nitrogen (N2), carbon dioxide (CO2), or gases used in ophthalmology such as sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) or octafluoropropane (C3F8). Additionally the guard may comprise the fluid or gas of a therapeutic or diagnostic formulation to be delivered. Fluid or gas volumes and pressures to sufficiently displace the tissues without overinflating the eye but allowing enough space to safely perform an injection are usefully in the range of about 10 microliters to 500 microliters volume and about 0.05 mm Hg to 52 mm Hg gauge pressures, and preferably in the range of 50 microliters to 250 microliters volume and 4 mm Hg to 30 mm Hg gauge pressure. Such a fluidic guard may be delivered through a syringe filled with the fluid or gas attached to the proximal connector.
In another embodiment (
The device may be adapted to automatically activate the delivery of the fluid or gas, or the delivery may be activated and controlled by the user. Automatic delivery may be triggered by a plate or stop, which, when the stop comes in contact with the surface of the eye, triggers the delivery of the fluid or gas. In one embodiment (
In another embodiment (
In another embodiment (
The depth of penetration to enter the suprachoroidal or subretinal space is in the range of about 0.02 inches (0.5 mm) to 0.157 inches (4 mm).
In another embodiment (
In another embodiment (
Alternatively, (
The device may also comprise indicators to show when the guard has been deployed to protect the underlying choroid and retina, and that a pathway to the suprachoroidal space or sub-retinal space has been established. An indicator may comprise a depth indicator of the mechanical guard or a volume or flow indicator of the reservoir. An indicator may also be coupled to a sensor to initiate a visual or audible signal to the user to limit penetration with the device and indicate that the eye is ready for injection of materials to the suprachoroidal or sub-retinal space.
Referring to
In another embodiment (
The device may further comprise a feature to limit the depth of penetration of the distal tip. This feature may comprise a mechanical stop or flange disposed about the outer diameter of the device body which limits travel by the stop encountering the surface of the eye. The stop may be in the form of a flat surface which may be disposed perpendicularly to the body of the device or may be disposed at an angle to the body such that the angle approximates the angle of the surface of the globe in relation to the angle of entry by the device itself. The stop configurations may be incorporated into the mechanism used to guard the device, such as the outer tubular member previously described. The stop may be adjustable to allow the user to tailor the use of the device to different tissue thicknesses, for example in different regions of the eye.
In many embodiments, as shown in the top view,
The following Examples are provided for the purpose of illustrating particular devices and methods according to the invention. These Examples are not intended to limit the scope of the invention in any manner.
A device according to one embodiment of the invention was fabricated and tested for its ability to successfully penetrate the sclera and displace the choroid for access to the suprachoroidal space. The device was comprised of a needle as the main shaft and a spring loaded guard element. The needle element was comprised of a 27 gauge (0.4 mm)×0.5 inch (12.7 mm) short bevel hypodermic needle (Monoject, Covidien Inc) as the main shaft. The needle tip bevel angle was 18°, and the proximal end was a standard Luer lock connector. The spring loaded guard element was comprised of a stainless steel wire 0.007 inch (0.18 mm) diameter sized to fit slideably within the lumen of the needle element main shaft and of a length so that the distal tip of the wire extended beyond the distal needle tip by 0.004 inch (0.1 mm). The tip of the wire was rounded so as not to have any sharp edges. The wire was welded into a larger stainless steel tube, sized to slideably fit inside a compression spring. A spring perch was welded to the distal end of said tube. A spring with an inner diameter of 0.049 inch (1.25 mm) and a spring rate of 0.7 lb./in (0.12 N/mm) was placed over said tube. A second outer tube, sized to fit slideably about the spring tube and with an outer diameter larger than the spring outer diameter was placed about the spring tube, to act as a proximal stop for the spring. The wire was inserted into the lumen of the needle element. A Touhy-Borst Luer connector was attached to the needle Luer connector, and then tightened about the outer tube to hold it in place. This spring assembly allowed the wire to move rearward inside the needle.
A human cadaver eye was used for the experiment. The guard wire tip was placed against the tissue surface and the device advanced slowly into the tissues. The guard tip was seen to retract against the spring pressure, allowing the needle tip to enter the tissues. When the needle had been inserted approximately 0.6 inch (1.5 mm) the advancement was stopped. Using a high resolution optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging system, the device placement was imaged. The needle tip could be clearly seen in the suprachoroidal space with the guard tip extending beyond the needle tip and displacing the choroid
A device according to one embodiment of the invention was fabricated and tested for its ability to successfully penetrate the sclera and displace the choroid for access to the suprachoroidal space. The device was comprised of a stainless steel tubular main shaft, 0.79 inches (20 mm) long and 0.016 inches (0.4 mm) outer diameter and 0.008 inches (0.2 mm) inner diameter with a sharp 12° beveled tip. The main shaft was bonded proximally into a plastic female Luer connector. A mechanical guard element comprised of a distal thin walled polyimide tube with an inner diameter 0.0165 inches (0.42 mm) and outer diameter of 0.0175 inches (0.45 mm) was bonded to a proximal stop 0.04 inches (1.0 mm) in diameter. The distal end of the polyimide tubing was beveled to allow for entry into the tissues. The guard member was loaded onto the main shaft with a stainless steel spring of 0.017 inches (0.43 mm) inner diameter with the spring wire diameter of 0.005 inches (0.13 mm) between the guard and the plastic hub, disposed about the main shaft. The device was tested using a human cadaver eye. The tip of the device was inserted into the sclera and advanced forward. The mechanical guard was pushed rearward, allowing the sharp main shaft tip to enter the scleral tissues. With continued advancement, the guard element was also advanced into the sclera. When the distal tip of the main shaft entered the suprachoroidal space, the spring force advanced the guard element ahead of the main shaft tip, displacing the choroid. Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) imaging confirmed the guard element tip location within the suprachoroidal space.
A device according to one embodiment of the invention was fabricated and tested for its ability to successfully penetrate the sclera and displace the choroid for access to the suprachoroidal space. The device was comprised of a metal main shaft 0.79 inches (20 mm) long and 0.016 inches (0.41 mm) outer diameter and 0.008 inches (0.2 mm) inner diameter with a sharp beveled tip. The main shaft was sealed at the proximal end and a side hole was made approximately 0.197 inches (5 mm) from the end. The device distal tip was angled to 30° and 0.059 inches (1.5 mm) length. The device featured a spring retractable metal sleeve disposed about the main shaft distal tip and that acted as a mechanism to trigger the infusion of gas into the suprachoroidal space when it retracted. The spring proximal end was attached to a metal sleeve that added structural support of the main shaft and Luer attachment. A Luer connector with a polymer septum was secured to the proximal end of the main shaft such that the main shaft penetrated the septum with the side hole distal to the septum. A check valve assembly was attached to the Luer connector to serve as a gas filled reservoir providing a means of infusing gas into suprachoroidal space to displace the choroid. The device was tested using a human cadaver eye. The device angled tip was inserted into the sclera near the pars plana and advanced until the angled tip was positioned in the suprachoroidal space. Upon contact with the scleral surface, the distal metal sleeve was pushed rearward until the spring force overcame the frictional force of the main shaft in the septum, which drove the proximal end of the main shaft through the septum positioning the side hole above the septum. Gas within the chamber was released through the main shaft, out the tip, and into the suprachoroidal space. Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) imaging confirmed the tip location within the suprachoroidal space and release of the fluidic air guard, displacing the choroid to prevent contact of the choroid with the tip.
A device according to one embodiment of the invention was fabricated and tested for its ability to successfully penetrate the sclera and displace the choroid for access to the suprachoroidal space. The device main shaft was comprised of a 0.016 inches (0.41 mm) outer diameter and 0.008 inches (0.2 mm) inner diameter and 0.984 inches (25 mm) long injection needle with sharp bevel straight tip and proximal Luer connector. Additional design features included a metal proximal and distal outer housing assembly, 0.028 inch (0.7 mm) diameter by 0.472 inches (12 mm) long segments connected by a 0.197 inches (5 mm) long coil spring. The distal outer housing segment provided a spring retractable protective sleeve and insertion depth stop at the main shaft distal tip. The proximal outer housing segment was attached to the main shaft for improved device rigidity. The proximal main shaft open end was inserted into a polymer septum of a pressurized fluid filled reservoir. The device was tested using a human cadaver eye. Upon inserting the device distal tip through the sclera and into the suprachoroidal space, the proximal main shaft moved backward axially, pierced through the septum and into the fluid reservoir. The reservoir content was then released into the open end of the proximal main shaft and discharged out the distal tip and into the suprachoroidal space. The resulting choroid displacement to prevent contact of the distal tip with the choroid was monitored and confirmed in real time with ultrasound imaging.
A device according to one embodiment of the invention was fabricated and tested for its ability to successfully penetrate the sclera and displace the choroid for access to the suprachoroidal space. The device was comprised of a metal main shaft 0.79 inches (20 mm) long and 0.016 inches (0.41 mm) outer diameter and 0.008 inches (0.2 mm) inner diameter with a sharp beveled tip. The main shaft was sealed at the proximal end and a side hole was made approximately 0.197 inches (5 mm) from the end. A Luer connector with a polymer septum was secured to the proximal end of the main shaft such that the main shaft penetrated through, with the side hole distal to the septum. A check valve assembly was attached to the Luer connector providing for a Tillable gas reservoir of approximately 100 microliters volume. A metal sleeve with an inner diameter of 0.020 inches (0.51 mm) and an outer diameter of 0.028 inch (0.71 mm) was disposed about the main shaft and attached to it near the proximal end. The sleeve acted as a mechanism to trigger the release of the gas filled reservoir into the suprachoroidal space when forced rearward, translating the side port to the reservoir side of the septum. An access port element 0.0065 inch (0.17 mm) inner diameter and 0.0005 inch (0.012 mm) wall thickness comprised of polyimide was disposed about the outside of the main shaft and inserted under the metal sleeve. The device was tested using a human cadaver eye. The device tip was inserted into the sclera near the pars plana and advanced until the tip entered the suprachoroidal space and the sleeve triggered the release of the reservoir, injecting gas to displace the choroid. The port element was then advanced forward into the suprachoroidal space. Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) imaging confirmed the distal end of the port location within the suprachoroidal space and a fluid injection was made through the port, while confirming inflation of the suprachoroidal space on imaging.
Devices fabricated according to Example 5 were tested to determine the delivered pressure of a gaseous fluidic guard based upon the amount of gas charged into the reservoir and to determine the amount of choroidal displacement achieved due to the gas charge in the reservoir. A diaphragm pressure transducer (PX26-100GV, Omega Engineering) was modified to place a Luer injection port into the transducer port, minimizing the dead volume of the transducer. The transducer was connected to a digital readout (DP-41S, Omega Engineering) and then calibrated to read out in mm Hg. The main shaft needle tip of a device under test was inserted into the injection port of the pressure transducer. The check valve was removed and the Luer connector advanced to open the internal valve mechanism and equalize the system pressure. The Luer connector was then pulled back, closing the internal valve and the check valve was re-installed. A 1 cc syringe was filled with a volume of air, attached to the check valve Luer connector of the device and then expelled to charge the reservoir. The device was advanced to open the internal valve and the gauge pressure of the delivered gas was read from the digital readout. Syringe volumes of 0.1 cc to 0.7 cc were tested. However the actual fill volume of the reservoir was less than the syringe volume. Due to the fixed volume of the reservoir and the limited ability of a manual syringe to compress the gas, a small amount of gas refluxed into the syringe as evidenced by the rebound of the syringe plunger after full depression of the plunger.
Additional devices were tested in-vitro using both human and porcine cadaver eyes, and in-vitro using a live porcine animal model. A 1 cc syringe was used to load the device reservoirs with 0.2, 0.4 or 0.6 cc of air. The devices were advanced into the eyes, activating the internal valve and releasing the reservoir contents, and the resultant choroidal displacement was measured using high frequency ultrasound imaging. The table below shows the experimental results.
A device fabricated according to Example 5 was tested for its ability to deliver a therapeutic agent to the suprachoroidal space. Porcine cadaver eyes were used in the experiment. The device reservoir was charged with 0.5 cc of air as the fluidic guard material. A syringe containing 0.25 cc of triamcinolone acetonide (TA), a corticosteroid particulate suspension (Kenalog 40, Bristol Meyers Squib), was attached to the proximal Luer connector of the device. The device was placed against the sclera of the cadaver eye and advanced until the distal tip entered the suprachoroidal space and discharged the reservoir gas, displacing the choroid away from the tip. After entering the space, the syringe plunger was depressed, injecting the TA suspension. High frequency ultrasound imaging confirmed that the suprachoroidal space had been opened and that TA particles were visible in the space. A perfusion system was set-up consisting of a reservoir of phosphate buffered saline (PBS) on a variable height platform. Tubing was attached to a port at the bottom edge of the reservoir, leading to a shut-off valve and a small tube with a Luer connector at the end. A 30 gauge (0.3 mm) hypodermic needle was attached to the reservoir Luer connector. The reservoir was elevated to provide 0.29 PSI (15 mm Hg) pressure. The 30 gauge needle was inserted through the cornea and into the anterior chamber to provide perfusion to the cadaver eye. The eye was allowed to perfuse for 6 hours at constant pressure. After the perfusion, the sclera of the eye over the injection site was dissected and removed. Examination under a light microscope showed the depot location of the TA particles on the choroid surface around the injection site. Also noted was a stream of particles extending approximately 0.55 inches (14 mm) posterior from the injection site, indicating a flow directed movement of the injectate towards the posterior pole of the eye.
In another test, a device fabricated according to Example 5 was tested in the manner of Example 5, however the device reservoir was charged with the suspension steroid instead of air. A syringe with additional injectate was attached to the device. The device was advanced into the tissues and the reservoir fluid contents were discharged when the suprachoroidal space was reached, displacing the choroid and allowing for injection of the remaining fluid in the syringe into the suprachoroidal space. The injection location and tissue displacement was confirmed by ultrasound imaging.
A device according to one embodiment of the invention was fabricated and tested for its ability to successfully penetrate the sclera and displace the choroid for access to the suprachoroidal space. The shafts and housings of the device were fabricated from 304 stainless steel hypodermic tubing. The device was comprised of a distal shaft of 0.016 inches (0.4 mm) outer diameter and 0.008 inches (0.2 mm) inner diameter by 0.75 inches (19 mm) long. The distal shaft had a standard hypodermic beveled tip with a main bevel angle of 12°. A shaft extension of 0.017 inches (0.43 mm) inner diameter and 0.025 inches (0.64 mm) outer diameter and 0.24 inches (6 mm) long was welded to the back of the distal shaft. A proximal shaft, the same diameter as the distal shaft and 0.42 inches (10.8 mm) long was cut and one end was welded shut. A side hole was ground through the wall 0.005 inches (0.13 mm) from the welded end. The distal end of the proximal shaft was slid inside the shaft extension on the distal shaft. A piece of 50 durometer silicone tubing 0.015 inches (0.38 mm) inner diameter by 0.027 inches (0.69 mm) by 0.2 inches (5 mm) long was placed over the junction between the proximal and distal shafts to seal the gap. An outer housing of 0.033 inches (0.84 mm) inner diameter by 0.046 inches (1.17 mm) outer diameter by 0.71 inches (18 mm) long was cut. Starting at 0.16 inches (4 mm) from the distal end of the outer housing and extending 0.5 inches (13 mm) long, one half of the outer housing was ground off leaving a half circle of tubing. An extension tube of 0.02 inches (0.51 mm) inner diameter by 0.032 inches (0.81 mm) outer diameter by 0.55 inches (14 mm) long was welded into the distal end of the outer housing, so as to act as the tissue contact portion of the moving assembly. The distal/proximal shaft assembly was placed inside the outer housing and a cross beam was welded to the distal shaft. The cross beam was adhesively bonded to a polycarbonate Luer connector. Inside the proximal end of the Luer connector, a solid disk of 50 durometer silicone rubber was inserted as a septum, with the tip of the proximal shaft just penetrating the septum so that the side hole was below the septum. A Luer check valve was attached to the Luer connector creating a sealed reservoir that could be filled from the Luer connector on the check valve.
The device was tested using a human cadaver eye. The reservoir was filled with air from a syringe. The device was placed against the tissue surface and advanced. As the outer housing assembly translated rearward, the side hole in the proximal shaft was translated to the reservoir side of the septum. The gas was released to displace the choroid and an injection of a suspension steroid (Kenalog 40, Bristol Meyers Squib) was made into the suprachoroidal space. The injection location was confirmed with ultrasound imaging.
A device according to one embodiment of the invention was fabricated and tested for its ability to successfully penetrate the sclera and displace the choroid for access to the suprachoroidal space. The device was comprised of a commercial 27 ga (0.4 mm) by 0.5 inch (12.7 mm) short bevel hypodermic needle (Monoject 27 g×½ needle, Covidien Inc.) with a bevel main angle of 18° as the main shaft. A sliding seal assembly was fabricated as follows. Two pieces of polycarbonate tubing of 0.018 inches (0.46 mm) inner diameter by 0.060 inches (1.52 mm) outer diameter were cut, a long piece at 0.37 inches (9.4 mm) and a short piece at 0.08 inches (2.0 mm) long. The proximal end of the longer piece was counter-bored at 0.028 inches (0.71 mm) diameter by 0.05 inches (1.3 mm) deep. A piece of 50 durometer silicone tubing 0.015 inches (0.38 mm) inner diameter by 0.027 inches (0.69 mm) outer diameter by 0.04 inches (1.0 mm) long was cut and inserted into the counter-bore in the long tube as an inner seal. The short piece of polycarbonate tubing was then adhesively bonded to the long tube over the counter-bore to cap the inner seal in place. A piece of 50 durometer silicone tubing of 0.025 inches (0.64 mm) inner diameter by 0.047 inches (1.2 mm) outer diameter was placed over the distal end of the polycarbonate assembly to form an outer seal. The silicone tubing was placed such that the distal edge extended beyond the end of the polycarbonate tubing to serve as a seal against the tissue surface. A spring with a spring constant of 0.97 lb./in (0.17 N/mm) was placed over the hypodermic needle and the sealing assembly was slid over the needle.
The device was tested using human cadaver eyes. 1 cc syringe was filled with 0.1 cc of a suspension steroid (Kenalog 40, Bristol Meyers Squib) and the syringe attached to the device. The tip of the device was placed in contact with the tissues and light pressure was placed on the syringe plunger, effectively pressurizing the fluid pathway. The device was advanced into the tissues, keeping the sealing assembly in contact with the surface and maintaining pressure on the syringe plunger. When the needle tip advanced through the sclera a sufficient distance, the fluid was able to be injected, displacing the choroid and injecting the fluid into the suprachoroidal space. The injection location was confirmed with ultrasound imaging.
A device according to one embodiment of the invention was fabricated and tested for its ability to successfully penetrate the sclera and displace the choroid for access to the suprachoroidal space. The device was comprised of an elastomeric tissue surface seal and a needle assembly as the main shaft with an integral depth stop. Two different models of the tissue surface seal were fabricated. The surface seal was comprised of 50A durometer silicone rubber. Disc shaped base elements, 0.06 inch (1.6 mm) in thickness were fabricated, either 0.17 inch (4.4 mm) or 0.26 inch (6.6 mm) in diameter. Annular shaped seal elements of the same thickness were fabricated with an outer diameter of 0.17 inch (4.4 mm) and an inner diameter of 0.06 inch (1.52 mm). An annular element was adhesively bonded centrally to a base element, using room-temperature vulcanization (RTV) silicone adhesive. A main shaft needle assembly was fabricated comprising a 27 ga (0.4 mm)×0.5 inch (12.7 mm) short bevel hypodermic needle (Monoject, Covidien Inc.). A short length of polycarbonate tubing 0.018 inches (0.46 mm) inner diameter by 0.06 inches (1.52 mm) outer diameter was placed over the needle shaft as a depth stop. The tubing was cut to a length so that the exposed needle length was 0.13 inch (3.35 mm). In combination with the thickness of the tissue seal base, this length would provide for a needle length extending beyond the base element, to enter the tissues, of 0.07 inch (1.75 mm). The outer diameter of depth stop was sized to fit snugly and seal within the inner diameter of the annular seal element.
A human cadaver eye was prepared. The tissue surface at the pars plana was carefully dried and a tissue seal assembly was placed in contact with the surface and pressed down to effect a seal. A 1 cc syringe was filled with 0.1 cc of triamcinolone acetonide steroid suspension (Kenalog 40, Bristol Meyers Squib) and attached to the needle assembly. The needle tip was inserted into the center of the base element and advanced so that the depth stop entered the inner diameter of the annular element, scaling the fluid pathway. The needle advance was continued along with light pressure on the syringe plunger. When the depth stop reached the based element, and with the needle inserted to full depth, the injection was made. Ultrasound imaging confirmed the injectate in the suprachoroidal space. Both tissue seal devices, having different base element diameters, were successful.
An experiment was performed to determine the range of lengths of the main shaft which would allow for injection into the suprachoroidal space in an eye. An adjustable stop was fabricated, sized to go over a 27 gauge (0.4 mm) hypodermic needle used as the main shaft. The distal end of the stop was 1.5 mm (0.06 inch) in diameter and the stop could be fixed in place so as to be able to have a set amount of needle tip extending beyond it. Two different needle bevels were tested. A standard hypodermic needle, with a nominal main bevel angle of 12 degrees (Precision Glide—27 ga×½ inch, Becton-Dickenson) and a short bevel needle, with a nominal main bevel angle of 18 degrees (Monoject 250-27 ga×½ inch, Covidien) were used in the tests.
Human cadaver eyes were procured and ultrasound imaging was used to determine the average tissue thickness. The average surface tissue (scleral) thickness was 0.028 inch (0.70 mm) and the average full tissue thickness (sclera and choroid) was 0.045 inch (0.1.15 mm). Triamcinolone acetonide (Kenelog-40, Bristol Meyers Squib), a suspension steroid, was used as the injectate as the injected particles are clearly visible using ultrasound imaging. A 1 cc syringe was filled with 0.1 cc of triamcinolone for each test and attached to the test needle.
For each test, the adjustable stop was set to a preset needle length, as measured with a digital caliper. The needle tip was inserted into the tissue at the pars plana and with the adjustable stop fully pressed against the tissue surface and an injection of the triamcinolone was attempted. The injection was then evaluated using the ultrasound system to determine whether the injection was A) unsuccessful, i.e. no injection, too shallow, B) successful in injecting into the suprachoroidal space, or C) injected into the vitreous cavity, i.e. too deep. The following table presents the test results along with the distance between the distal end of the adjustable stop and the distal edge of the needle tip lumen. The results indicate a main shaft or needle length greater than 0.05 inch (1.25 mm) and less than 0.12 inch (3.00 mm) provide the best results for injection into the suprachoroidal space.
The device of Example 5 was filled with 0.3 ml of air to act as a fluidic guard. The device was used to access the suprachoroidal space of eyes in anesthetized pigs at the pars plana region of the eye. Once the gas was injected into the suprachoroidal space, the device was used to inject 0.1 ml (4 mg) of triamcinolone acetonide suspension (Kenalog-40, Bristol Meyers Squib). Twelve eyes were injected and three each harvested at 1, 7, 14 and 30 days post injection. The eyes were dissected and 6 mm punches taken from the vitreous, retina, choroid and sclera at four quadrants of the eye and also the posterior retina. The level of drug in the tissues was assayed by solvent extraction of the tissues and quantitation by reverse phase HPLC. The results shown in
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/821,310, entitled “Device for Ocular Access,” filed Aug. 7, 2015, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/273,775, entitled “Device for Ocular Access,” filed Oct. 14, 2011, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/393,741, entitled “Device for Ocular Access,” filed Oct. 15, 2010, the entirety of each of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2187259 | Barnhart | Jan 1940 | A |
2841145 | Epps | Jul 1958 | A |
2939459 | Lazarte et al. | Jun 1960 | A |
3376999 | De Hart et al. | Apr 1968 | A |
3788320 | Dye | Jan 1974 | A |
3838690 | Friedman | Oct 1974 | A |
3962430 | O'Neill | Jun 1976 | A |
3964482 | Gerstel et al. | Jun 1976 | A |
4226328 | Beddow | Oct 1980 | A |
4377897 | Eichenbaum et al. | Mar 1983 | A |
4383530 | Bruno | May 1983 | A |
4417887 | Koshi | Nov 1983 | A |
4432964 | Shell et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
4501363 | Isbey, Jr. | Feb 1985 | A |
4525346 | Stark | Jun 1985 | A |
4564016 | Maurice et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4601708 | Jordan | Jul 1986 | A |
4615331 | Kramann | Oct 1986 | A |
4689040 | Thompson | Aug 1987 | A |
4708147 | Haaga | Nov 1987 | A |
4717383 | Phillips et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4736850 | Bowman et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4795432 | Karczmer | Jan 1989 | A |
4804371 | Vaillancourt | Feb 1989 | A |
4826490 | Byrne et al. | May 1989 | A |
4889529 | Haindl | Dec 1989 | A |
4941874 | Sandow et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4966773 | Gressel et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
5015240 | Soproni et al. | May 1991 | A |
5023087 | Yau-Young | Jun 1991 | A |
5024662 | Menes et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5057072 | Phipps | Oct 1991 | A |
5066276 | Wang | Nov 1991 | A |
5098389 | Cappucci | Mar 1992 | A |
5137447 | Hunter | Aug 1992 | A |
5164188 | Wong | Nov 1992 | A |
5181909 | McFarlane | Jan 1993 | A |
5206267 | Shulman | Apr 1993 | A |
5273530 | del Cerro et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5279564 | Taylor | Jan 1994 | A |
5295972 | Mischenko | Mar 1994 | A |
5300084 | Johnson | Apr 1994 | A |
5312361 | Zadini et al. | May 1994 | A |
5320609 | Haber et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5358489 | Wyrick | Oct 1994 | A |
5364373 | Waskonig et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5364374 | Morrison et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5395310 | Untereker et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5397313 | Gross | Mar 1995 | A |
5399159 | Chin et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5409457 | del Cerro et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5443505 | Wong et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5538503 | Henley et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5575780 | Saito | Nov 1996 | A |
5632740 | Koch et al. | May 1997 | A |
5658256 | Shields | Aug 1997 | A |
D383049 | Concari et al. | Sep 1997 | S |
5681825 | Lindqvist et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5766198 | Li | Jun 1998 | A |
5766242 | Wong et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5779668 | Grabenkort | Jul 1998 | A |
5788679 | Gravlee, Jr. | Aug 1998 | A |
5792099 | DeCamp et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5817075 | Giungo | Oct 1998 | A |
5824072 | Wong | Oct 1998 | A |
5919158 | Saperstein | Jul 1999 | A |
5952378 | Stjernschantz et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5968022 | Saito | Oct 1999 | A |
6059111 | Davilla et al. | May 2000 | A |
6083199 | Thorley et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6143329 | Kim | Nov 2000 | A |
6159218 | Aramant et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6280470 | Peyman | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6299603 | Hecker et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6309374 | Hecker et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6319225 | Sugita et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6334856 | Allen et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6378526 | Bowman et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6397849 | Bowman et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6413245 | Yaacobi et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6432090 | Brunel | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6494865 | Alchas | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6503231 | Prausnitz et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6524581 | Adamis | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6530904 | Edwards et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6540725 | Ponzi | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6564630 | Klemp | May 2003 | B1 |
6569123 | Alchas et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6611707 | Prausnitz et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6622864 | Debbs et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6743211 | Prausnitz et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
D499153 | Kuo | Nov 2004 | S |
6929623 | Stone | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6936053 | Weiss | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6979316 | Rubin et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
7025774 | Freeman et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7150735 | Hickle | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7207965 | Simon | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7207980 | Christian et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7211062 | Kwon | May 2007 | B2 |
7214212 | Pommereau et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7226439 | Prausnitz et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7316676 | Peyman et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7435237 | Tan | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7468057 | Ponzi | Dec 2008 | B2 |
D590690 | Bertini | Apr 2009 | S |
D598543 | Vogel et al. | Aug 2009 | S |
7569035 | Wilmot et al. | Aug 2009 | B1 |
7648482 | Edwards et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7678077 | Harris et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7678078 | Peyman et al. | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7722581 | Peyman | May 2010 | B2 |
7914803 | Chowhan et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7918814 | Prausnitz et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7918874 | Siegal | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7947660 | Clark et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7967772 | McKenzie et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8003124 | Varner et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8009162 | Takatori | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8099162 | Roy | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8114110 | Bednarek et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8128960 | Kabra et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8137312 | Sundar et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8172830 | Christian et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8173617 | Clark et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8192408 | Nazzaro et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8197435 | Prausnitz et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8197443 | Sundar et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8221353 | Cormier et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8235967 | Chevallier et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
D667111 | Robinson | Sep 2012 | S |
8287494 | Ma | Oct 2012 | B2 |
D672506 | Szymanski | Dec 2012 | S |
8323227 | Hamatake et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8328772 | Kinast et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8337421 | Freeman et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8337509 | Schieber et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8348924 | Christian et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8430862 | Peyman et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8460242 | Paques et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8506515 | Burns et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8529492 | Clauson et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8535333 | de Juan, Jr. et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8545430 | Silvestrini | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8545554 | Novakovic et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8562545 | Freeman et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8571802 | Robinson et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8574214 | Kuhn et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8574217 | Peyman | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8602959 | Park et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8617121 | Lanin et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8632589 | Helmy | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8636713 | Prausnitz et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8652118 | Peyman | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8663167 | Bartha | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8663303 | Horvath et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8668676 | Chang | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8685435 | Nivaggioli et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8702659 | Lanin et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8747365 | De Sausmarez Lintell | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8795226 | Kuhn et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8808225 | Prausnitz et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8808242 | Paques et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
D713958 | Srinivasan et al. | Sep 2014 | S |
8821870 | Robinson et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
D715125 | Hung | Oct 2014 | S |
8852137 | Horvath et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8864740 | Schabbach et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
D718602 | Musser | Dec 2014 | S |
D719256 | Ohashi | Dec 2014 | S |
8920375 | Gonnelli | Dec 2014 | B2 |
D726908 | Yu et al. | Apr 2015 | S |
D733289 | Blanchard et al. | Jun 2015 | S |
D740098 | Kuo et al. | Oct 2015 | S |
9180047 | Andino et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
D750223 | Andino et al. | Feb 2016 | S |
9539139 | Andino et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9572800 | Zarnitsyn et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9636253 | Andino et al. | May 2017 | B1 |
9636332 | Zarnitsyn et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9770361 | Andino et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9788995 | Prausnitz et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9931330 | Zarnitsyn et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9937075 | Andino et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9956114 | Andino et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
10188550 | Andino et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10390901 | Godfrey et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10517756 | Andino et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10555833 | Andino et al. | Feb 2020 | B2 |
10632013 | Prausnitz et al. | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10722396 | Andino et al. | Jul 2020 | B2 |
20010008961 | Hecker et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010051798 | Hochman | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020042594 | Lum et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020052580 | Ooyauchi | May 2002 | A1 |
20020082543 | Park et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020112981 | Cooper et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020142459 | Williams et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020156413 | Williams et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030009113 | Olson | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030050602 | Pettis et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030083645 | Angel et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030139729 | Stegmann et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030171722 | Paques et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030233070 | De La Serna et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040019331 | Yeshurun | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040039253 | Peyman et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040049150 | Dalton et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040106904 | Gonnelli et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122359 | Wenz et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040141925 | Bosch et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040186084 | Alam et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040199130 | Chornenky et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040215347 | Hayes | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040249404 | Haefliger | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040265365 | Daddona et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050009910 | Hughes et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050033230 | Alchas et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050055083 | Carranza et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050065137 | Jani et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050089545 | Kuwano et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050101582 | Lyons et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050101882 | Leira et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050101967 | Weber et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050137525 | Wang et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050148034 | Hariri et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050171507 | Christian et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050181017 | Hughes et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050203575 | Carson et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050209565 | Yuzhakov et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050244462 | Farooq | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050244463 | Huang et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050244469 | Whitcup et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050245906 | Makower et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050256499 | Pettis et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050281862 | Karakelle et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060013859 | Yamada et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060036318 | Foulkes | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060084942 | Kim et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060086689 | Raju | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060089607 | Chen | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060141049 | Lyons et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060173418 | Rinaudo et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060178614 | Nemati | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060189608 | Bingaman | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060229562 | Marsh et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060233858 | Tzekov et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060259008 | Orilla | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060271025 | Jones et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070060927 | Longson et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070073197 | Prausnitz et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070082841 | Higuchi et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070093877 | Beecham et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070178197 | Larue et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070191863 | De Juan et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070202116 | Burnie et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070202186 | Yamamoto et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070225654 | Hess et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070233037 | Gifford, III et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070260201 | Prausnitz et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070270745 | Nezhat et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070270768 | Dacquay et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070282405 | Wong et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070287985 | Estes et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070299386 | Peyman | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080008762 | Robinson et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080033351 | Trogden et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080058704 | Hee et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080058717 | Spector | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065002 | Lobl et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080071246 | Nazzaro et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080097335 | Trogden et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080097346 | Charles | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080097390 | Dacquay et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080131484 | Robinson et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080152694 | Lobl et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080177239 | Li et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080228127 | Burns et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080234625 | Dacquay et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090030381 | Lind et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090076463 | Attinger | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090081277 | Robinson et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090082321 | Edelman et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090088721 | Bizemont et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090105749 | De Juan et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090148527 | Robinson | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090259180 | Choi | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090287161 | Traub et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090312782 | Park | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100010004 | Van emelen et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100010452 | Paques et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100015158 | Robinson et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100057011 | Charles | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100074957 | Robinson et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100098772 | Robinson et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100100054 | Cormier et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100152646 | Girijavallabhan et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100152667 | Kietzmann | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100173866 | Hee et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100191176 | Ho et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100211079 | Aramant | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100241102 | Ma | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100312120 | Meier | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110004265 | Wenger et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110060310 | Prestrelski et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110112546 | Juan, Jr. et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110166531 | Stroumpoulis et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110202012 | Bartlett | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110213317 | Chen et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110238075 | Clauson et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110243999 | Dellamary et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110282298 | Again et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110295152 | Sasaki et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110306923 | Roy | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120004245 | May et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120024987 | Nagele Nacken | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120029360 | Hendriks et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120035524 | Silvestrini | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120078224 | Lerner et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120083727 | Barnett | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120095414 | Lanin et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120095438 | Lanin et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120101475 | Wilmot et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120116306 | Heald et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120123351 | Lanin et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120123386 | Tsals | May 2012 | A1 |
20120123437 | Horvath et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120123440 | Horvath et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120123473 | Hernandez | May 2012 | A1 |
20120130207 | O'dea et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120136318 | Lanin et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120150128 | Zhao | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120157880 | Haselby et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120165723 | Horvath et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120191064 | Conston et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120197208 | Bruggemann et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120197218 | Timm | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120220917 | Silvestrini et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120259288 | Wagner et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120265149 | Lerner et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120271272 | Hammack et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130035662 | Decker et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130040895 | Robinson et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130041265 | Sostek et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130060202 | Thorley et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130065888 | Cetina-Cizmek et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130072900 | Colantonio | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130079716 | Thorley et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130096533 | Freeman et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130102973 | Thorley et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130116523 | Jung et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130138049 | Kemp et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130140208 | Hemmann | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130150803 | Shetty et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130190694 | Barrow-Williams et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130216623 | Yamamoto et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130218102 | Iwase et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130218269 | Schachar et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130237910 | Shetty et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130237916 | Hanson et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130245600 | Yamamoto et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130253416 | Rotenstreich | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130289545 | Baerveldt et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130295006 | Christoforidis et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130331786 | Hofmann | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130338612 | Smith et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140010823 | Robinson et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140012226 | Hochman | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140031833 | Novakovic et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140039391 | Clarke et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140039413 | Jugl et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140088552 | Soni et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140094752 | Hiles | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140114243 | Smith et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140135716 | Clarke et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140194834 | Passaglia et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140200518 | Ekman et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140224688 | Slemmen et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140236098 | Mica et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140243754 | Clarke et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140249539 | Mica et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140257207 | Clarke et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140276482 | Astafieva et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140296802 | Geiger et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140309599 | Schaller | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140323979 | Henley et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140323985 | Hourmand et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140330213 | Hourmand et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140350479 | Hourmand et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150013827 | Kuhn | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150013835 | Cordes | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150025474 | Riedel et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150045731 | Gupta et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150045744 | Gupta et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150051545 | Henderson et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150110717 | Distel et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150129456 | Miller et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150133415 | Whitcup | May 2015 | A1 |
20150209180 | Prausnitz et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150223977 | Oberkircher | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150258120 | Zarnitsyn et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150297609 | Shah et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150320596 | Gifford, III et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160015895 | Blondino et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160022486 | Clauson et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160106584 | Andino et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160106587 | Jarrett et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160193080 | Hammack et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160206628 | Zarnitsyn et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160213662 | Zarnitsyn et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160310417 | Prausnitz et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160331738 | Jarrett et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170095369 | Andino et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170216228 | Asgharian et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170224435 | Godfrey et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170224534 | Andino et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170273827 | Prausnitz et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170290702 | Yamamoto et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170333416 | Zarnitsyn et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170340560 | Yamamoto et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20180028358 | Andino et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180028516 | Zarnitsyn et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180042765 | Noronha et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180042767 | Andino et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180092897 | Zarnitsyn et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180325884 | Zarnitsyn et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180333297 | Andino et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20190231592 | Andino et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190240208 | Zarnitsyn et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190269702 | White et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190290485 | Andino et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190307606 | Andino et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190350755 | Andino et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20200030143 | Andino et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200061357 | Jung et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200237556 | Prausnitz et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2639322 | Mar 2009 | CA |
1229679 | Sep 1999 | CN |
1604799 | Apr 2005 | CN |
101052434 | Oct 2007 | CN |
101351239 | Jan 2009 | CN |
201356711 | Dec 2009 | CN |
101854891 | Oct 2010 | CN |
101959519 | Jan 2011 | CN |
103037802 | Apr 2013 | CN |
103209733 | Jul 2013 | CN |
103857431 | Jun 2014 | CN |
006961 | Jun 2006 | EA |
1188456 | Mar 2002 | EP |
1568359 | Aug 2005 | EP |
2193821 | Jun 2010 | EP |
2307055 | Apr 2011 | EP |
2001-525826 | Dec 2001 | JP |
2007-510744 | Apr 2007 | JP |
2007-518804 | Jul 2007 | JP |
2009-183441 | Aug 2009 | JP |
2009-531298 | Sep 2009 | JP |
2010-234034 | Oct 2010 | JP |
2013-543418 | Dec 2013 | JP |
10-2008-0099285 | Nov 2008 | KR |
14351 | Jul 2000 | RU |
2344767 | Jan 2009 | RU |
2353393 | Apr 2009 | RU |
WO 9208406 | May 1992 | WO |
WO 9220389 | Nov 1992 | WO |
WO 9412217 | Jun 1994 | WO |
WO 9851348 | Nov 1998 | WO |
WO 2000007530 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO 2000007565 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO 2001041685 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO 2002058769 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO 2003002094 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO 2003024507 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO 2003039633 | May 2003 | WO |
WO 2005011741 | Feb 2005 | WO |
WO 2005032510 | Apr 2005 | WO |
WO 2005046641 | May 2005 | WO |
WO 2005069831 | Aug 2005 | WO |
WO 2005072701 | Aug 2005 | WO |
WO 2005074942 | Aug 2005 | WO |
WO 2005107845 | Nov 2005 | WO |
WO 2006004595 | Jan 2006 | WO |
WO 2006042252 | Apr 2006 | WO |
WO 2006058189 | Jun 2006 | WO |
WO 2006128034 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO 2006138719 | Dec 2006 | WO |
WO 2007100745 | Sep 2007 | WO |
WO 2007130105 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO 2007131050 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO 2007150018 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO 2008082637 | Jul 2008 | WO |
WO 2009067325 | May 2009 | WO |
WO 2009105534 | Aug 2009 | WO |
WO 2009114521 | Sep 2009 | WO |
WO 2010009034 | Jan 2010 | WO |
WO 2010054660 | May 2010 | WO |
WO 2010132751 | Nov 2010 | WO |
WO 2011057065 | May 2011 | WO |
WO 2011123722 | Oct 2011 | WO |
WO 2011139713 | Nov 2011 | WO |
WO 2012019136 | Feb 2012 | WO |
WO 2012051575 | Apr 2012 | WO |
WO 2012118498 | Sep 2012 | WO |
WO 2012125869 | Sep 2012 | WO |
WO 2012125872 | Sep 2012 | WO |
WO 2012162459 | Nov 2012 | WO |
WO 2013050236 | Apr 2013 | WO |
WO 2013098166 | Jul 2013 | WO |
WO 2013151904 | Oct 2013 | WO |
WO 2014028285 | Feb 2014 | WO |
WO 2014036009 | Mar 2014 | WO |
WO 2015015467 | Feb 2015 | WO |
WO 2015195842 | Dec 2015 | WO |
WO 2015196085 | Dec 2015 | WO |
WO 2016042162 | Mar 2016 | WO |
WO 2016042163 | Mar 2016 | WO |
WO 2017120600 | Jul 2017 | WO |
WO 2017120601 | Jul 2017 | WO |
WO 2017139375 | Aug 2017 | WO |
WO 2017190142 | Nov 2017 | WO |
WO 2017192565 | Nov 2017 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/743,535, dated Aug. 19, 2010, 7 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/743,535, dated Dec. 29, 2009, 6 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2007/068055, dated Nov. 7, 2007, 13 pages. |
Office Action for Canadian Application No. 2797258, dated Nov. 21, 2016, 3 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 11777924.9, dated Feb. 4, 2015, 7 pages. |
Office Action for Russian Application No. 2012147341, dated Feb. 26, 2015, 8 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/767,768, dated Jun. 10, 2011, 5 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2011/033987, dated Feb. 14, 2012, 7 pages. |
Examination Report No. 1 for Australian Application No. 2015230874, dated Jul. 28, 2017, 11 pages. |
Office Action for Japanese Application No. 2016-068174, dated Mar. 1, 2017, 8 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/447,246, dated Oct. 28, 2013, 5 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/453,407, dated Mar. 20, 2013, 5 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/136,657, dated Dec. 16, 2016, 7 pages. |
Extended Search Report for European Application No. 13833318.2, dated Apr. 1, 2016, 7 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/424,685, dated Jun. 10, 2016, 10 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/424,685, dated Dec. 12, 2016, 15 pages. |
Supplementary Partial European Search Report for European Application No. 13853777.4, dated Jul. 4, 2016, 6 pages. |
Search Report and Written Opinion for Singapore Application No. 11201503637S, dated Jun. 23, 2016, 9 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/441,151, dated Sep. 9, 2016, 18 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/001,610, dated Sep. 8, 2016, 12 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/086,485, dated Jul. 28, 2016, 9 pages. |
Supplementary European Search Report for European Application No. 14808034.4, dated Jan. 23, 2017, 7 pages. |
Office Action for European Application No. 14808034.4, dated Nov. 8, 2017, 4 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/894,161, dated Dec. 27, 2016, 17 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/894,161, dated Sep. 20, 2017, 21 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/894,161, dated Apr. 6, 2018, 19 pages. |
Examination Report No. 1 for Australian Application No. 2014259694, dated May 24, 2018, 2 pages. |
First Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201480025034.4, dated Apr. 24, 2018, 10 pages. |
Office Action for Eurasian Application No. 201592109, dated Apr. 1, 2016, 4 pages. |
Office Action for Eurasian Application No. 201592109, dated Jan. 31, 2018, 2 pages. |
Extended Search Report for European Application No. 14791646.4, dated Nov. 21, 2016, 6 pages. |
Office Action for European Application No. 14791646.4, dated Dec. 4, 2017, 5 pages. |
Office Action for European Application No. 14791646.4, dated Sep. 17, 2018, 5 pages. |
Notice of Reasons for Rejection for Japanese Application No. 2016-512068, dated Mar. 26, 2018, 4 pages. |
Office Action for Mexican Application No. MX/a/2015/015282, dated Oct. 26, 2018, 4 pages. |
Office Action for New Zealand Application No. 714172, dated Feb. 1, 2018, 4 pages. |
Office Action for New Zealand Application No. 714172, dated Jul. 24, 2018, 4 pages. |
Office Action for New Zealand Application No. 714172, dated Dec. 12, 2018, 3 pages. |
Search Report and Written Opinion for Singapore Application No. 11201509051V, dated Nov. 2, 2016, 6 pages. |
Examination Report for Singapore Application No. 11201509051V, dated Feb. 1, 2017, 4 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2014/036590, dated Dec. 10, 2014, 10 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/268,687, dated May 19, 2016, 6 pages. |
Partial European Search Report for European Application No. 18176172.7, dated Oct. 30, 2018, 13 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 18176172.7, dated Feb. 6, 2019, 11 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/523,243, dated Feb. 27, 2015, 14 pages. |
First Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201580044250.8, dated Apr. 24, 2018, 14 pages. |
Second Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201580044250.8, dated Jan. 2, 2019, 7 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 15808944.1, dated Jan. 19, 2018, 14 pages. |
Office Action for Russian Application No. 2017101236/14, dated Jan. 18, 2019, 4 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/319,045, dated Jul. 13, 2018, 13 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2015/036299, dated Nov. 10, 2015, 11 pages. |
Partial Supplementary European Search Report for European Application No. 15810459.6, dated Dec. 22, 2017, 13 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 15810459.6, dated Apr. 16, 2018, 11 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/383,582, dated May 5, 2017, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2015/036715, dated Jan. 19, 2016, 9 pages. |
Office Action for Canadian Application No. 162010, dated Aug. 25, 2015, 1 page. |
Office Action for Chinese Application No. 200780014501.3, dated Mar. 11, 2010, 6 pages. |
Office Action for Chinese Application No. 200780014501.3, dated Aug. 26, 2010, 10 pages. |
Office Action for European Application No. 07751620.1, dated Sep. 13, 2013, 7 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 07751620.1, dated Jan. 15, 2013, 10 pages. |
Office Action for European Application No. 07751620.1, dated Dec. 11, 2014, 5 pages. |
Invitation pursuant to Article 94(3) and Rule 71(1) for European Application No. 07751620.1, dated Feb. 29, 2016, 3 pages. |
Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings Pursuant to Rule 115(1) EPC for European Application No. 07751620.1, dated Jun. 13, 2017, 8 pages. |
Office Action for Japanese Application No. 2008-556462, dated Jul. 24, 2012, 15 pages. |
Office Action for India Application No. 3345/KOLNP/2008, dated May 21, 2015, 3 pages. |
Office Action for Singapore Application No. 200805936-2, dated Oct. 15, 2012, 7 pages. |
Search Report and Written Opinion for Singapore Application No. 200805936-2, dated Jun. 8, 2010, 13 pages. |
Supplementary Search Report for Singapore Application No. 200805936-2, dated May 6, 2011, 8 pages. |
Supplementary Search Report for Singapore Application No. 200805936-2, dated May 26, 2011, 8 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/709,941, dated Jun. 24, 2014, 11 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/709,941, dated Mar. 23, 2011, 9 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/709,941, dated Feb. 11, 2015, 14 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/709,941, dated Oct. 27, 2011, 8 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/709,941, dated Apr. 12, 2016, 25 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/709,941, dated Dec. 27, 2016. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/709,941, dated Jan. 16, 2018, 32 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/709,941, dated Dec. 14, 2018, 17 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2007/004874, dated Jun. 4, 2008, 6 pages. |
Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201110093644.6, dated Mar. 26, 2012, 11 pages. |
Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201110093644.6, dated Sep. 7, 2012, 8 pages. |
Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201110093644.6, dated Dec. 14, 2012, 3 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 18176149.5, dated Jan. 22, 2019, 11 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/842,218, dated Jul. 5, 2016, 11 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/842,288, dated Oct. 6, 2015, 10 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/398,538, dated Jul. 20, 2018, 12 pages. |
First Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201180060268.9, dated Oct. 10, 2014, 9 pages. |
Second Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201180060268.9, dated Jun. 18, 2015, 4 pages. |
Third Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201180060268.9, dated Feb. 5, 2016, 6 pages. |
Examination Report for European Application No. 11776049.6, dated Oct. 25, 2016, 4 pages. |
Office Action for Japanese Application No. 2013-534049, dated Sep. 1, 2015, 11 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/273,775, dated Feb. 12, 2015, 13 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/273,775, dated Jul. 3, 2014, 12 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2011/056433, dated Apr. 25, 2012, 17 pages. |
Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201510144330.2, dated Apr. 5, 2016, 17 pages. |
Second Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201510144330.2, dated Dec. 20, 2016, 13 pages. |
Third Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201510144330.2, dated Jun. 28, 2017, 3 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/821,310, dated Jul. 14, 2017, 11 pages. |
First Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201610805842.3, dated Jul. 21, 2017, 4 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/427,823, dated Apr. 20, 2017, 8 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/427,823, dated Sep. 27, 2017, 7 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/427,823, dated Jul. 20, 2018, 11 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2017/017014, dated Apr. 27, 2017, 13 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2017/012755, dated Apr. 12, 2017, 8 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2017/012757, dated Apr. 12, 2017, 11 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2017/030609, dated Oct. 6, 2017, 12 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2017/030439, dated Aug. 1, 2017, 12 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2017/065796, dated Apr. 12, 2018, dated Apr. 12, 2018, 9 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2017/046553, dated Dec. 13, 2017, 14 pages. |
Abbott Laboratories Inc., Abbott Park, Illinois, USA, Abbott Medical Optics, “HEALON5 OVD,” 2004, [online]. Retrieved from the Interent: <URL: http://abbottmedicaloptics.com/products/cataract/ovds/healon5-viscoelastic>. Retrieved from the Internet on: Aug. 16, 2016, 5 pages. |
Anthem, USA, “Medical Policy. Suprachoroidal Injection of a Pharmacologic Agent,” Last Review Date: Nov. 14, 2013, [online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.anthem.com/medicalpolicies/policies/mp_pw_b076412.htm>. Retrieved from the Internet on: Oct. 24, 2014, American Medical Association, 3 pages. |
Beer, P. J. et al., “Photographic Evidence of Vitreous Wicks After Intravitreal Injections,” Retina Today, 2(2):24-39 (Mar. 2007). |
Berglin, L. C. et al., “Tracing of Suprachoroidally Microneedle Injected Labled Drugs and Microbeads in Human, Pig and Rabbit Tissue Using Liquid Nitrogen Snap-Freeze Thaw and Lypholization Techniques,” Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci., 51:E-Abstract 5330 (2010), 2 pages. |
Brown, D. M., “Aflibercept for Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema,” Retina Today, Jul./Aug. 2011, pp. 59-60. |
Careforde Inc., Careforde Healthcare, Chicago, IL, “B Braun Glass Loss-Of-Resistance Syringes # 332155-5cc Glass Loss-Of-Resistance Syringe, Luer Lock Metal Tip, 10/cs,” [online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <http://careforde.com/b-braun-glass-loss-of-resistance-syringes-332155-5cc-glass-loss-of-resistance-syringe-luer-lock-metal-tip-10-cs/>. Retrieved from the Internet on: Oct. 16, 2014, (2014), 2 pages. |
Careforde Healthcare, B Braun Glass Loss-Of-Resistance Syringes # 332158-10cc Glass Loss-Of-Resistance Syringe, Luer Slip Metal Tip, 10/cs, (2014), 2 pages. |
Careforde Inc., Careforde Healthcare, Chicago, IL, “B Braun Perifix Plastic Loss-Of-Resistance Syringes # 332152-8cc Plastic Luer Lock Loss-of-Resistance Syringe, 50/cs,” [online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <http://careforde.com/b-braun-perifix-plastic-loss-of-resistance-syringes-332152-8cc-plastic-luer-lock-loss-of- resistance-syringe-50-cs/>. Retrieved from the Internet on: Oct. 16, 2014, (2014), 2 pages. |
Cho, S. W. et al., “Drug delivery to the suprachoroidal space,” Chap. 12 in: Ocular Drug Delivery Systems: Barriers and Application of Nanoparticulate Systems, Thassu, D. et al. (eds.), CRC Press, pp. 235-258 (2012). |
Choy, Y. B. et al., “Mucoadhesive microdiscs engineered for ophthalmic drug delivery: effect of particle geometry and fomulation on preocular residence time,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 49:4808-4815 (2008). |
Claims filed in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/454,636, Mar. 9, 2017, pp. 1-30. |
Dinning, W. J., “Steroids and the eye-indications and complications,” Postgraduate Medical Journal, vol. 52, 1976, pp. 634-638. |
Doncaster and Bassetlaw Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Ophthalmology, “Intravitreal injection of triamcinolone,” Jul. 2010, [online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.dbh.nhs.uk/Library/Patient_Information_Leaflets/WPR32110%20IIT%20No%20crops.pdf>, 2 pages. |
Edwards, A. et al., “Fiber matrix model of sclera and corneal stroma for drug delivery to the eye,” AIChE Journal, 44(1):214-225 (1998). |
Einmahl, S. et al., “Evaluation of a novel biomaterial in the suprachoroidal space of the rabbit eye,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., 43(5):1533-1539 (2002). |
Einmahl, S. et al., “Ocular biocompatibility of a poly(ortho ester) characterized by autocatalyzed degradation,” J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 67(1):44-53 (2003). |
“Epidural,” Wikipedia [online], retrieved from the internet on Sep. 3, 2014, <URL: http:/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epidural>, 21 page. |
Falkenstein, I. A. et al., “Comparison of visual acuity in macular degeneration patients measured with Snellen and Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy study charts,” Ophthalmology 115(2):319-323 (Feb. 2008). |
Feldkamp, L. A. et al., “Practical cone-beam algorithm,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 1(6):612-619 (1984). |
Furrer, P. et al., “Ocular tolerance of preservatives and alternatives,” European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, 53(3):263-280 (2002). |
Geroski, D. H. et al., “Drug delivery for posterior segment eye disease,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., 41(5):961-964 (2000). |
Gilger, B. C. et al., “Treatment of acute posterior uveitis in a porcine model by injection of triamcinolone acetonide into the suprachoroidal space using microneedles,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 54(4):2483-2492 (2013). |
Gilger, et al., “A Novel Bioerodible Deep Scleral Lamellar Cyclosporine Implant for Uveitis,” Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, vol. 47, Issue 6, 2006, pp. 2596-2605. |
Hanekamp, S. et al., “Inhibition of Corneal and Retinal Angiogenesis by Organic Integrin Antagonists After Intrascleral or Intravitreal Drug Delivery,” Invest Ophthalmol Vis. Sci., 43: E-Abstract 3710, ARVO (2002), 2 pages. |
Heller, J., Ocular delivery using poly(ortho esters), Adv. Drug. Deliv. Rev., 57(14):2053-2062 (2005). |
Haller, J. A., “Intraocular Steroids in the Office. New formulations offer preservative-free triamcinolone without relying on compounding pharmacies,” Retinal Physician [online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: https://www.retinalphysician.com/supplements/2009/february-2009/special-edition/intraocular-steroids-in-the-office>, Feb. 1, 2009, 4 pages. |
Hogan et al., Chapter Eight, Choroid, in Histology of the Human Eye, 9 pages. (1971). |
Jain, A., “Pseudo loss of resistance in epidural space localization: A complication of subcutaneous emphysema or simply a faulty technique,” Saudi J. Anaseth, 5(1):108-109 (2011) (Abstract). |
Jiang, J. et al., “Measurement and Prediction of Lateral Diffusion within Human Sclera,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 47(7):3011-3016 (2006). |
Jiang, J. et al., “Coated Microneedles for Drug Delivery to the Eye,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 48(9):4038-4043 (2007). |
Jiang, J. et al., “Intrascleral drug delivery to the eye using hollow microneedles,” Pharmaceutical Research, 26(2):395-403 (2009). |
Kadam, R. S. et al., “Suprachoroidal delivery in a rabbit ex vivo eye model: influence of drug properties, regional differences in delivery, and comparison with intravitreal and intracameral routes,” Molecular Vision, 19:1198-1210 (May 2013). |
Karim, R. et al., “Interventions for the treatment of uveitic macular edema: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Clinical Ophthalmology, 7:1109-1144 (2013). |
Lee, S-B et al., “Drug delivery through the sclera: effects of thickness, hydration and sustained release systems,” Experimental Eye Research, 78:599-607 (2004). |
Lee et al., “Thixotropic property in pharmaceutical formulations,” Journal of Controlled Release (2009) 136:88-98. |
Lindfield, D. et al., “Suprachoroidal Devices in Glaucoma. The Past, Present, and Future of Surgery for Suprachoroidal Drainage,” Cataract & Refractive Surgery Today Europe, [online], Oct. 2013, Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://bmctoday.net/crstodayeurope/2013/10/article.asp?f=suprachoroidal-devices-in-glaucoma>. Retrieved from the Internet on: Oct. 24, 2014, Bryn Mawr Communications LLC, Wayne, PA, USA, 3 pages. |
Loewen, N., “The suprachoroidal space in glaucoma surgery,” Jul. 2012, 4 pages. |
Maurice, D., “Review: Practical Issues in Intravitreal Drug Delivery,” J. Ocul. Pharmacol. Ther., 17(4):393-401 (2001). |
McAllister, D. V. et al., “Microfabricated needles for transdermal delivery of macromolecules and nanoparticles: Fabrication methods and transport studies,” Proc. Nat'l Acad. Sci USA, 100(24):13755-13760 (2003). |
Norman, D., Epidural analgesia using loss of resistance with air versus saline: Does it make a difference? Should we reevaluate our practice?, AANA Journal, 71(6):449-453 (Dec. 2003). |
Olsen, T. W. et al., “Cannulation of the Suprachoroidal Space: A Novel Drug Delivery Methodology to the Posterior Segment,” American J. Opthamology, 142(5):777-787 (2006). |
Olsen, , T., “Drug Delivery to the Suprachoroidal Space Shows Promise,” Retina Today, pp. 36-39 (Mar./Apr. 2007). |
Ozkiris, A., “Intravitreal Triamcinolone Acetonide Injection for the Treatment of Posterior Uveitis,” Ocular Immunology and Inflammation, vol. 14, Issue 4, pp. 233-238 (May 2006), Published online: Jul. 8, 2009 (Abstract). |
Patel, S. R. et al., “Targeted administration into the suprachoroidal space using a microneedle for drug delivery to the posterior segment of the eye,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 53(8):4433-4441 (Jul. 2012). |
Patel, S. et al., “Suprachoroidal Drug Delivery Using Microneedles,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., 49:E-Abstract 5006 (2008), 2 pages. |
Patel, S. et al., “Drug Binding to Sclera,” Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci., 50:E-Abstract 5968 (2009), 2 pages. |
Patel, S. R. et al., “Intraocular Pharmacokinetics of Suprachoroidal Drug Delivery Administered Using Hollow Microneedles,” Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci., 51:E-Abstract 3796 (2010), 2 pages. |
Patel, S. R. et al., “Suprachoroidal drug delivery to the back of the eye using hollow microneedles,” Pharmaceutical Research, 28(1):166-176 (2011). Published online: Sep. 21, 2010. |
Penkov, M. A. et al., “A ten-year experience with usage of the method of supra-choroidal administration of medicinal substances,” Oftalmol. Zh., 35(5):281-285 (1980) (Translated from Russian). |
Prausnitz, M. R. et al., “Permeability of cornea, sclera and conjunctiva: A literature analysis for drug delivery to the eye,” Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 87(12):1479-1488 (1998). |
Prausnitz, M. R. et al., “Measurement and prediction of transient transport across sclera for drug delivery to the eye,” Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 37(8):2903-2907 (1998). |
Rowe-Rendleman, C. L. et al., “Prophylactic Intra-Scleral Injection of Steroid Compounds in Rabbit Model of Retinal Neovascularization,” Invest Ophthalmol Vis. Sci.,43:E-Abstract 3872, ARVO (2002), 2 pages. |
Saberski, L. R. et al., “Identification of the epidural space: Is loss of resistance to air a safe technique? A review of the complications related to the use of air,” Regional Anesthesia, 22(1):3-15 (1997). |
Sallam, A. et al., “Repeat intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injections in uveitic macular oedema,” Acta Ophthalmologica, 90(4):e323-e325 (2012). |
Scott, I. U. et al., “Baseline characteristics and response to treatment of participants with hemiretinal compared with branch retinal or central retinal vein occlusion in the standard care vs. corticosteroid for retinal vein occlusion (SCORE),” Arch. Ophthalmol., 130(12):1517-1524 (Dec. 2012). |
Shuler, R. K. et al., “Scleral Permeability of a Small, Single-Stranded Oligonucleotide,” Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 20(2):159-168 (2004) (Abstract). |
Wang, P. M. et al., “Minimally Invasive Extraction of Dermal Interstitial Fluid for Glucose Monitoring Using Microneedles,” Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics, 7(1):131-141 (2005). |
You, X. D. et al., “Chitosan drug delivery system implanting into suprachoroidal space for perforating ocular injury in rabbits,” International Journal of Ophthalmology, 5(1):74-76 (2005) [English Abstract]. |
Office Action for European Application No. 11777924.9, dated Oct. 1, 2019, 5 pages. |
Office Action for Indian Application No. 10099/DELNP/2012, dated Jul. 2, 2019, 5 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/708,779, dated Jul. 15, 2019, 8 pages. |
Office Action for Canadian Application No. 2,882,184, dated May 1, 2019, 3 pages. |
Preliminary Office Action for Brazilian Application No. 112015010566-1, dated Aug. 12, 2019, 6 pages/ |
Notification of Reexamination for Chinese Application No. 201380069089.0, dated Jul. 11, 2019, 13 pages. |
Office Action for Eurasian Application No. 201590902, dated Feb. 26, 2019, 1 page. |
Office Action for Indian Application No. 4885/DELNP/2015, dated May 31, 2019, 6 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/830,727, dated Mar. 7, 2019, 13 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/124,407, dated Jul. 11, 2019, 17 pages. |
Office Action for Israeli Application No. 242395, dated May 7, 2019, 7 pages. |
Office Action for Mexican Application No. MX/a/2015/015282, dated May 15, 2019, 8 pages. |
Notice of Reasons for Rejection for Japanese Application No. 2018-142345, dated Jun. 6, 2019, 6 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/946,838, dated Jun. 27, 2019, 7 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/381,213, dated May 31, 2019, 7 pages. |
Examination Report No. 1 for Australian Application No. 2015277133, dated Mar. 29, 2019, 6 pages. |
Third Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201580044250.8, dated Jul. 17, 2019, 9 pages. |
Notice of Reasons for Rejection for Japanese Application No. 2016-573927, dated Mar. 26, 2019, 10 pages. |
Office Action and Search Report for Russian Application No. 2017101236/14, dated May 16, 2019, 16 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/319,045, dated Apr. 2, 2019, 14 pages. |
Notice of Reasons for Rejection for Japanese Application No. 2016-574090, dated Mar. 4, 2019, 18 pages. |
Office Action for Russian Application No. 2017101660, dated Mar. 5, 2019, 7 pages. |
Office Action for Brazilian Application No. PI 0708133-2, dated Feb. 26, 2019, 11 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/398,538, dated Apr. 16, 2019, 8 pages. |
Office Action for Brazilian Application No. 112013009205-0, dated Sep. 17, 2019, 4 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 18199418.7, dated Jul. 5, 2019, 9 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 17750694.6, dated Sep. 2, 2019, 6 pages. |
Haller, J. A. et al., “Evaluation of the safety and performance of an applicator for a novel intravitreal dexamethasone drug delivery system for the treatment of macular edema,” Retina, 29(1):46-51 (2009). |
Office Action for Canadian Application No. 2,890,471, dated Dec. 3, 2019, 4 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/591,067, dated Nov. 18, 2019, 7 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/319,045, dated Dec. 31, 2019, 24 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2018/030688, dated Aug. 8, 2018, 22 pages. |
Keraliya, R. A. et al., “Osmotic Drug Delivery System as a Part of Modified Release Dosage Form,” ISRN Pharmaceuticals, 2012, vol. 2012, Article ID 528079. doi: 10.5402/2012/528079. Epub Jul. 17, 2012, 9 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/826,443, dated Jun. 1, 2020, 6 pages. |
Office Action for Canadian Application No. 2,882,184, dated Jan. 24, 2020, 6 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/619,065, dated Jan. 28, 2020, 24 pages. |
Preliminary Office Action for Brazilian Application No. 112015027762-4, dated Jan. 17, 2020, 6 pages. |
Office Action for Canadian Application No. 2,911,290, dated Jun. 18, 2020, 5 pages. |
Office Action for European Application No. 14791646.4, dated Feb. 11, 2020, 5 pages. |
Office Action for European Application No. 18176172.7, dated Feb. 7, 2020, 4 pages. |
Decision of Final Rejection for Chinese Application No. 201580044250.8, dated Nov. 28, 2019, 14 pages. |
Office Action for European Application No. 15808944.1, dated Mar. 5, 2020, 6 pages. |
Office Action for Israel Application No. 249602, dated Apr. 5, 2020, 7 pages. |
Notice of Reasons for Rejection for Japanese Application No. 2016-573927, dated Dec. 27, 2019, 10 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/178,162, dated Jun. 10, 2020, 18 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 17880800.2, dated Jun. 2, 2020, 13 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/675,035, dated Jun. 11, 2020, 14 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2020/028493, dated Jul. 15, 2020, 14 pages. |
HomeCEU, “How Does Iontophoresis Work?”, [Online], Retrieved from the Internet: <https://www.homeceuconnection.com/blog/how-does-iontophoresis-work/, 2018, 5 pages. |
Office Action for European Application No. 18199418.7, dated Nov. 10, 2020, 5 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190000669 A1 | Jan 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61393741 | Oct 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14821310 | Aug 2015 | US |
Child | 15872206 | US | |
Parent | 13273775 | Oct 2011 | US |
Child | 14821310 | US |