The present invention is directed to a device for preparing a fluid sample, including but not limited to samples which include genomic DNA. More particularly, aspects of the present invention are directed to a device with a reaction chamber and a porous membrane.
According to one aspect, a device for preparing a sample is provided. The device includes a body having a chamber with an inlet and a membrane positioned in the body. The membrane has a first side and a second side, where the inlet is positioned on the first side of the membrane. The device also includes a plurality of channels optionally coupled to the bottom of the chamber, where the plurality of channels are optionally positioned on the second side of the membrane. Each of the plurality of channels extends outwardly from the membrane, the plurality of channels including at least a first channel and a second channel, where the first channel extends outwardly from a central portion of the membrane, and where the second channel extends outwardly from a peripheral portion of the membrane.
According to another aspect, a device for preparing a sample is provided. The device includes a body having a chamber with an inlet and a membrane positioned in the body. The membrane has a first side and a second side, where the inlet is positioned on the first side of the membrane. The membrane includes at least a first zone and a second zone, where the first zone is the central portion of the membrane and the second zone is the peripheral portion of the membrane and there is a barrier which separates the first zone of the membrane from the second zone of the membrane. The device also includes a plurality of channels coupled to the bottom of the chamber, where the plurality of channels are positioned on the second side of the membrane, in some embodiments.
The present invention further encompasses methods of making and/or using one or more of the embodiments described herein.
Other advantages and novel features of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description of various non-limiting embodiments of the invention when considered in conjunction with the accompanying Figures. In cases where the present specification and a document incorporated by reference include conflicting and/or inconsistent disclosure, the present specification shall control. If two or more documents incorporated by reference include conflicting and/or inconsistent disclosure with respect to each other, then the document having the later effective date shall control.
Non-limiting embodiments of the present invention will be described by way of example with reference to the accompanying Figures, which are schematic and are not intended to be drawn to scale. For purposes of clarity, not every component is labeled in every figure, nor is every component of each embodiment of the invention shown where illustration is not necessary to allow those of ordinary skill in the art to understand the invention.
The invention in its broadest sense provides devices and methods of use thereof for positioning or manipulating or concentrating agents within a fluid, including but not limited to polymers such as genomic DNA. Aspects of the invention allow the agents to be concentrated into relatively small portions of the fluid. This may provide a higher concentration of the agent within a portion of the fluid, or decrease losses as the agent undergoes processing due to a decrease of contact area between the agent and the membrane.
Certain aspects of the invention relate to using a chamber for positioning or manipulating an agent, such as genomic DNA. In some aspects, the chamber is minimally comprised of an inlet port, a porous membrane that allows fluid but not the agent of interest to pass through, and a plurality of channels positioned on a side of the porous membrane opposite the inlet port. The chamber may be operated in a first mode where a fluid containing agents is introduced into the chamber through the inlet port and flowed through the porous membrane in the chamber. Fluid may be introduced through one or more of the channels to move a portion of the fluid towards a peripheral portion of the membrane. The desired agents may then be positioned on the central portion of the membrane. Flow may be reversed through the inlet port to move any agents positioned on the membrane out of the chamber in central streamlines that exit the chamber through the first fluid port.
The invention is based in part on devices with chambers (referred to herein interchangeably as a “reaction chamber” or a “fluidic chamber”) that may be used to concentrate a fluid sample, which may contain various agents, to a smaller volume of fluid. Concentrating samples may prove useful when relatively small volumes are available for analysis. Additionally or alternatively, concentrating a sample may prove useful in introducing a sample from a macro-scale environment, such as from where a sample may have been collected, to a micro-scale or nano-scale environment, such as where analysis may be performed on the sample. In one embodiment, the device is configured to isolate, purify, and then process various types of samples, including, but not limited to DNA from microorganisms.
Embodiments of the chamber may be constructed with different configurations and dimensions, some examples of which are discussed herein. By way of example, the chamber 10 may provide a diffusive flow pathway between the inlet port 12 and the flow region, which, in many embodiments, may laterally spread the flow of fluid introduced through the inlet port to promote even distribution of agents about the porous membrane.
The chamber 10 may be shaped differently according to various embodiments. In one illustrative embodiment, the chamber 10 includes a diffuser portion 8 which is typically designed to smoothly widen or diffuse flow that enters the flow region from the inlet port without subjecting agents to excessive shear forces. As shown in
The inlet port 12 is typically positioned in the central portion of the chamber and is configured to direct a flow of fluid orthogonally toward the porous membrane 14 of the chamber 10. According to other embodiments, however, the inlet port 12 may be offset to one side of the chamber. Additionally or alternatively, the inlet port may direct fluid flow toward the membrane at an angle, instead of orthogonally. It is also to be appreciated that embodiments of the chamber may include a plurality of inlet ports positioned about the diffuser portion 8.
The chamber and/or inlet port, when described as being substantially opposed to the membrane 14, are understood to be positioned to direct fluid to impinge on a surface of the membrane. That is, at least a portion of the fluid flow is directed to intersect with the membrane 14.
The porous membrane 14 (also referred to herein as a substrate or a filter) is typically positioned to receive fluid flow that is introduced to the chamber from the inlet port 12, as shown in
As set forth in more detail below, the membrane 14 may comprise a removable filter material that is held by a frit or support body 28, as shown in
In one embodiment, the chamber 10 may include a body section 6 that defines a wall of the chamber 10 that lies between the membrane 14 and the diffuser portion 8. As shown in
A plurality of channels 16, 18, 20 are positioned adjacent the membrane 14, and as shown in
The plurality of channels 16, 18, 20 are configured to be connected to an external pump or valve that controls the proportion of flow that passes though the channels. Any vacuum (or positive pressure) produced by the external pump, in turn, causes a vacuum (or pressure) in one or more selected channels 16, 18, 20 to move the fluid sample in the chamber. For example, if a vacuum is applied within the first channel 16, fluid within the chamber 10 will move into the first channel 16 and agents will collect along the central portion of the porous membrane 14. If a vacuum is applied within the second channel 18, fluid within the chamber 10 will move into the second channel 18 and agents may collect along the peripheral portion of the porous membrane 14, and similarly, if a vacuum is applied within the third channel 20, fluid within the chamber 10 will move into the third channel 20 and agents may collect along the peripheral portion of the porous membrane 14. As set forth in more detail below, in one embodiment, a vacuum may be applied within the first channel 16 to initially move the fluid sample and its agents toward the central portion of the membrane 14 (i.e. toward the first zone 40 of the membrane). Thereafter, a vacuum may be applied within the second channel 18 and/or the third channel 20 to move undesired agents and/or debris towards the peripheral portion of the membrane 14 (i.e. toward the second zone 50 of the membrane 14), thus isolating the desired agents on the central portion of the membrane 14. It is contemplated that a vacuum may also be applied within the first channel 16 at the same time that a vacuum is being applied within the second and third channels 18, 20. Flow may be reversed through the first channel 16 to move the desired agents on the central portion of the membrane out of the chamber 10. In one embodiment, when a vacuum is applied within the first channel 16, the fluid flows substantially normal or perpendicular to the membrane 14 such that the desired agents in the fluid sample press against the central zone of the membrane. When a vacuum is applied within the second and/or third channels 18, 20, the fluid may flow with a tangential component toward the peripheral portion of the membrane 14.
In one embodiment, the membrane 14 includes at least a first zone 40 and a second zone 50, where the first zone 40 is the central portion of the membrane 14 and the second zone is the peripheral portion of the membrane 14. In one embodiment, the second zone 50 substantially surrounds the first zone 40, and the second zone 50 may be substantially annular shaped. Other shapes are also contemplated, and in one embodiment, there may be a plurality of second zones 50 as the invention is not necessarily so limited. In one embodiment, the first zone is substantially circular shaped, although other shapes are also contemplated.
As shown in
It is recognized that the barrier 60 could be formed in a variety of different ways. For example, in one embodiment, the barrier 60 may be formed by a weld on the membrane material. The first and second zones 40, 50 of the membrane 14 may be made of one continuous membrane material with a weld formed therein to isolate the first zone 40 from the second zone 50. In another embodiment, the first and second zones 40, 50 may be formed of at least two membrane materials and another type of barrier 60, such as, but not limited to added layers of the membrane material, or other types of objects which physically separate the two zones 40, 50 may be employed.
The size and shape of the membrane 14 and the barrier 60 may vary, but as shown in
As shown in
In one embodiment, the device 100 may also be equipped with features to regulate temperature in the chamber 10. According to one embodiment, a frit 28 that lies below and supports the membrane 14 is made of a thermally conductive material, like stainless steel, and may be heated or cooled by an external source, like a thermoelectric module, to regulate temperature. Additionally or alternately, fluid may pass through the chamber 10 to cool or heat the chamber. The chamber may also be equipped with other devices, like a radiant heater that heats fluid in the chamber through non-contact methods, or like an inline heater that heats fluids entering the chamber which, in turn, may help maintain uniform temperature conditions throughout the chamber volume.
Broadly speaking, the plurality of channels 16, 18, 20 are configured to receive fluid that has passed through the membrane from the flow region. As set forth below, the flow through the various channels 16, 18, 20 can be varied to control the movement of the fluid sample and the agents contained within the fluid sample. It is however to be appreciated that the channels 16, 18, may be used to accomplish other effects, such as heating and/or cooling of the flow region, as discussed herein.
In one embodiment, focused flow techniques may be employed during the injection step. In particular, the buffer fluid surrounding the probe 80 is utilized to focus the flow of the sample in the chamber 10. For example, a vacuum may be applied within the first channel 16 at a first flow rate. As mentioned above, this will cause the fluid in the chamber to move toward the central portion of the membrane 14. The fluid sample is injected into the device at a second flow rate. In one embodiment, the first flow rate is greater than the second flow rate, such that the buffer surrounding the probe 80 also moves toward the membrane. The flow rate of the buffer toward the membrane is approximately equal to the difference between the first flow rate and the second flow rate. This surrounding sheathed buffer flow may act to focus the flow of the sample toward the membrane 14 by constraining the sample towards the central portion of the membrane. In one particular embodiment, the first flow rate is approximately 200 microliters/minute, and the second flow rate is approximately 100 microliters/min, thus the resulting flow rate of the surrounding buffer is approximately 100 microliters/min. In another embodiment, the first flow rate is approximately 100 microliters/minute, and the second flow rate is approximately 50 microliters/min, thus the resulting flow rate of the surrounding buffer is approximately 50 microliters/min.
Thereafter, another washing step may be performed as shown in
The steps shown in
As shown in
As shown in
As shown best in
As shown in
As mentioned above, these first and second portions 300, 310 illustrated in
Fluid flow may be controlled through the chamber during the various steps with different configurations of pumps and valves. According to some embodiments, flow is controlled by a first variable flow rate pump in fluid communication with the first channel 16 and by a second variable flow rate pump that is in fluid communication with the second and third channels 18, 20. It is to be appreciated, however, that other arrangements of pumps (either pressure or vacuum) and valves may be used to control flow through the chamber in various modes of operation, as aspects of the invention are not limited in this respect. Additionally, aspects of the invention are not limited to any one type of pump or valve.
Embodiments of the chamber may be operated by a controller that receives information for a particular operating protocol and, in turn, controls pumps and/or valves to run the system automatically to complete the protocol. The term ‘automatically’, as used herein, refers to a system that is capable of switching between modes of operation without the intervention of an operator, or to a system that is otherwise capable of altering operating conditions, such as flow rates or temperatures without manual operator intervention, such as by following a predefined operating protocol or by controlling the system to predetermined set points. The controller and operating protocol combination may be implemented in any of numerous ways. For example, in one embodiment, the controller and operating protocol combination may be implemented using hardware, software or a combination thereof. When implemented in software, the software code can be executed on any suitable processor or collection of processors, whether provided in a single computer or distributed among multiple computers. It should be appreciated that any component or collection of components that perform the functions described herein can be generically considered as one or more controllers that control the functions discussed herein. The one or more controllers can be implemented in numerous ways, such as with dedicated hardware, or with general purpose hardware (e.g., one or more processors) that is programmed using microcode or software to perform the functions recited above. The one or more controllers may be included in one or more host computers, one or more storage systems, or any other type of computer that may include one or more storage devices coupled to the one or more controllers.
In this respect, it should be appreciated that one implementation of the embodiments of the present invention comprises at least one computer-readable medium (e.g., a computer memory, a floppy disk, a compact disk, a tape, etc.) encoded with an operating protocol in the form of a computer program (i.e., a plurality of instructions), which, when executed by the controller, performs the herein-discussed functions of the embodiments of the present invention. The computer-readable medium can be transportable such that the treatment protocol stored thereon can be loaded onto any computer system resource to implement the aspects of the present invention discussed herein. In addition, it should be appreciated that the reference to an operating protocol or controller which, when executed, performs the herein-discussed functions, is not limited to an application program running on a host computer. Rather, the term operating protocol is used herein in a generic sense to reference any type of computer code (e.g., software or microcode) that can be employed to program a processor to implement the herein-discussed aspects of the present invention.
The device may also comprise one or more sensors that receive information from the chamber or channels used to connect the chamber to other portions of the device. Such sensors may receive information regarding pressure, temperature, flow rates, and the like, in any portion of the chamber or device. The device may also receive information for detectors that are used to analyze or detect the presence of an agent in a portion of the device.
It should be appreciated that various embodiments of the present invention may be formed with one or more of the above-described features. The above aspects and features of the invention may be employed in any suitable combination as the present invention is not limited in this respect. It should also be appreciated that the drawings illustrate various components and features which may be incorporated into various embodiments of the present invention. For simplification, some of the drawings may illustrate more than one optional feature or component. However, the present invention is not limited to the specific embodiments disclosed in the drawings. It should be recognized that the present invention encompasses embodiments which may include only a portion of the components illustrated in any one drawing figure, and/or may also encompass embodiments combining components illustrated in multiple different drawing figures.
It should be understood that the foregoing description of various embodiments of the invention are intended merely to be illustrative thereof and that other embodiments, modifications, and equivalents of the invention are within the scope of the invention recited in the claims appended hereto.
This application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/625,743, entitled “DEVICE FOR PREPARING A SAMPLE” filed on Apr. 18, 2012, and U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/783,601, entitled “DEVICE FOR PREPARING A SAMPLE” filed on Mar. 14, 2013, the entire contents of both of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3954621 | Etani et al. | May 1976 | A |
3969218 | Scott | Jul 1976 | A |
4147621 | Giddings | Apr 1979 | A |
4545888 | Walsh | Oct 1985 | A |
4608147 | Clad et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4617102 | Tomblin et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4833332 | Robertson, Jr. et al. | May 1989 | A |
4964961 | Brautigam et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
5102518 | Doering et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5126022 | Soane et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5133844 | Stevens | Jul 1992 | A |
5141651 | Giddings | Aug 1992 | A |
5169511 | Allington et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5284559 | Lim et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5304487 | Wilding et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5318680 | Fishman et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5340449 | Shukla | Aug 1994 | A |
5427663 | Austin et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5439573 | Luo | Aug 1995 | A |
5449917 | Clements | Sep 1995 | A |
5453382 | Novotny et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5505831 | Liao et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5601694 | Maley et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5674743 | Ulmer | Oct 1997 | A |
5675155 | Pentoney, Jr. et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5699157 | Parce | Dec 1997 | A |
5711861 | Ward et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5711868 | Maley et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5733442 | Shukla | Mar 1998 | A |
5766435 | Liao et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5798215 | Cathey et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5800690 | Chow et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5837115 | Austin et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5843767 | Beattie | Dec 1998 | A |
5846727 | Soper et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5867266 | Craighead | Feb 1999 | A |
5879625 | Roslaniec et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5880473 | Ginestet | Mar 1999 | A |
5888370 | Becker et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5906723 | Mathies et al. | May 1999 | A |
5942093 | Rakestraw et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5965001 | Chow et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5971158 | Yager et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6001229 | Ramsey | Dec 1999 | A |
6008892 | Kain et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6013164 | Paul et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6019882 | Paul et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6071394 | Cheng et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6071395 | Lange | Jun 2000 | A |
6090251 | Sundberg et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6100541 | Nagle et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6120666 | Jacobson et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6139800 | Chandler | Oct 2000 | A |
6193647 | Beebe et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6210896 | Chan | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6214246 | Craighead | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6218126 | Yasuda et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6224728 | Oborny et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6232464 | Lange | May 2001 | B1 |
6263286 | Gilmanshin et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6277257 | Paul et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6319469 | Mian et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6319472 | Ackley et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6355420 | Chan | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6403311 | Chan | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6413401 | Chow et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6428666 | Singh et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6432630 | Blankenstein | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6444992 | Kauvar et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6489112 | Hadd et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6495015 | Schoeniger et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6506609 | Wada et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6562307 | Schuch et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6572749 | Paul et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6605454 | Barenburg et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6641708 | Huang et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6645757 | Okandan et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6660480 | Ramsey et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6696022 | Chan et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6762059 | Chan et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6767731 | Hannah et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6770182 | Griffiths et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6770201 | Shepodd et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6772070 | Gilmanshin et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6790671 | Austin et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6818113 | Williams et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6866759 | Miles et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6890411 | Hayes et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6914137 | Baker | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6927065 | Chan et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6943009 | Lacey et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6949355 | Yamanishi et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6960285 | Schoeniger et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6998598 | Horn et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7014747 | Cummings et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7052608 | Shepodd et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7094345 | Gilbert et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7262859 | Larson et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7282330 | Zhao et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7332126 | Tooke et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7351538 | Fuchs et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7371520 | Zhao et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7402422 | Fuchs et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7595160 | White et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7648677 | Santini, Jr. et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7828948 | Hatch et al. | Nov 2010 | B1 |
7888011 | Nilsen et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7977048 | Gilmanshin | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8114636 | Agnew et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8168380 | Chan | May 2012 | B2 |
8361716 | Patil | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8423294 | Nadel et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
20010030130 | Ricco et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010055817 | Malmqvist et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020008028 | Jacobson et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020029814 | Unger et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020034748 | Quake et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020055167 | Pourahmadi et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020058332 | Quake et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020072243 | Craighead et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020079008 | Chien et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020109844 | Christel et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020110495 | Hunt et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020110818 | Chan | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020119455 | Chan | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020187508 | Wong | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020197639 | Shia et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030008320 | Baker | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030010637 | Cummings | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030054395 | Baker | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030058440 | Scott et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030059822 | Chan et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030104466 | Knapp et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030124623 | Yager et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030130499 | Baker | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030134416 | Yamanishi et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030162181 | Yang et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030215864 | Gilmanshin et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030235854 | Chan et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040000519 | Jiang et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040028580 | Futami et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040053399 | Gilmanshin | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040084370 | Singh et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040126279 | Renzi et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040166025 | Chan et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040188254 | Spaid | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040211669 | Cummings et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040214211 | Gilmanshin et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040235014 | Nadel et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050009066 | Connolly | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050042665 | Gilmanshin et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050112606 | Fuchs et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050112620 | Chan | May 2005 | A1 |
20050112671 | Maletta et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050123944 | Neely et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050123974 | Gilmanshin et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050142565 | Samper et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050142595 | Maletta et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050148064 | Yamakawa et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050153354 | Gilmanshin | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050191760 | Heath et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050196790 | Rooke | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050221408 | Nalefski et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060134679 | Larson | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060160231 | Nadel et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060191792 | Herr et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060194306 | Herr et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060204978 | Nilsen et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060211055 | Hafeman et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060292616 | Neely et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060292617 | Neely et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070031961 | Ho et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070042406 | Yantz et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070117092 | Sadarangani et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070128083 | Yantz et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070166743 | Gilmanshin | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080003689 | Lee et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080085552 | Larson et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080103296 | Zhao et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080254549 | Fuchs et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080280285 | Chen et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090035770 | Mathies et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090325269 | Marschke | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100035247 | Burton et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100112576 | Patil | May 2010 | A1 |
20100116025 | Gouveia et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100120101 | Patil et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100234237 | Yoo | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100294665 | Allen et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20120283955 | Cameron et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130000738 | Krogmeier et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130266935 | Patil | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130295686 | Meltzer et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130309780 | Meltzer et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 380 337 | Jan 2004 | EP |
2148325 | May 1985 | GB |
63-196845 | Aug 1988 | JP |
3075602 | Mar 1991 | JP |
5072178 | Mar 1993 | JP |
5223778 | Aug 1993 | JP |
8327595 | Dec 1996 | JP |
2005-181204 | Jul 2005 | JP |
WO 9416313 | Jul 1994 | WO |
WO 9830571 | Jul 1998 | WO |
WO 9835012 | Aug 1998 | WO |
WO 9909042 | Feb 1999 | WO |
WO 0009757 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO 0050172 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO 0056444 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO 0070080 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 0128700 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO 0229106 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO 03000416 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO 2004076692 | Sep 2004 | WO |
WO 2005078137 | Aug 2005 | WO |
WO 2005085849 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO 2006017274 | Feb 2006 | WO |
WO 2008024483 | Feb 2008 | WO |
WO 2008085991 | Jul 2008 | WO |
WO 2008111959 | Sep 2008 | WO |
WO 2009009127 | Jan 2009 | WO |
WO 2010149292 | Dec 2010 | WO |
WO 2011102804 | Aug 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Burton et al., A microfluidic chip-compatible bioassay based on single-molecule detection with high sensitivity and multiplexing. Lab Chip. Apr. 7, 2010;10(7):843-51. Epub Jan. 14, 2010. |
Mollova et al., An automated sample preparation system with mini-reactor to isolate and process submegabase fragments of bacterial DNA. Anal Biochem. Aug. 15, 2009;391(2):135-43. Epub May 12, 2009. Supplemental Material Included. 23 pgs. |
Protozanova et al., Fast high-resolution mapping of long fragments of genomic DNA based on single-molecule detection. Anal Biochem. Jul. 1, 2010;402(1):83-90. Epub Mar. 20, 2010. Supplemental Material Included. 29 pgs. |
[No Author Listed] Figure 5. Physics Today Online. Available at http://www.physicstoday.org/pt/vol-54/iss-6/captions/p42cap5.html. Last accessed Jul. 15, 2002. 2 pages. |
[No Author Listed] FRAEN FLP Series Lenses for Luxeon LEDs: Luxeon I, III, and V, Star and Emitter. Jan. 4, 2005. Available at http://www.fraensrl.com/images/FLP—Lens—Series—Datasheet.pdf. 8 pages. |
Agronskaia et al. Two-color fluorescence in flow cytometry DNA sizing: Identification of single-molecule fluorescent probes. Anal. Chem. 1999;71:4684-4689. Abstract. |
Ashworth. et al., Transducer mechanisms for optical biosensors. Part 2: Transducer design. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. Sep. 1989;30(1):21-31. |
Bender et al., Surveillance for Escherichia coli O157:H7 infections in Minnesota by molecular subtyping. N Engl J Med. Aug. 7, 1997;337(6):388-94. |
Boone et al., Plastic advances microfluidic devices. Anal Chem. Feb. 1, 2000;74(3):78A-86A. |
Burns et al., An integrated nanoliter DNA analysis device. Science. Oct. 16, 1998;282(5388):484-7. |
Chan et al., DNA mapping technology based on microfluidic stretching and single-molecule detection of motif tags. Biophys J. 2003;84:302A. Poster 1470. Board #B725. |
Chan et al., DNA mapping using microfluidic stretching and single-molecule detection of fluorescent site-specific tags. Genome Res. Jun. 2004;14(6):1137-46. |
Cheek et al., Chemiluminescence detection for hybridization assays on the flow-thru chip, a three-dimensional microchannel biochip. Anal Chem. Dec. 15, 2001;73(24):5777-83. |
Chou et al., A microfabricated device for sizing and sorting DNA molecules. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Jan. 5, 1999;96(1):11-13. |
Cova et al., Evolution and prospects for single-photon avalanche diodes and quenching circuits. J Mod Opt. Jun.-Jul. 2004;51(9-10):1267-88. |
D'Antoni et al., Single Molecule Detection of Proteins Using Microfluidic Fluorescence Detection. ORC Poster. Apr. 2006. 1 page. |
Dittrich et al., Sorting of cells and single particles in microstructures. Biophys J. 2002;82:43a. 209-Pos. Board # B70. |
Duke et al., Microfabricated sieve for the continuous sorting of macromolecules. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1998; 80:1552-1555. Abstract Only. |
Ertas, Lateral separation of macromolecules and polyelectrolytes in microlithographic arrays. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1998; 80:1548-1551. Abstract Only. |
Foquet et al., DNA fragment sizing by single molecule detection in submicrometer-sized closed fluidic channels. Anal Chem. Mar. 15, 2002;74(6):1415-22. (Abstract Only). |
Giddings et al., Chapter 1. The Field-Flow Fractionation Family: Underlying Principles. In: Field-Flow Fractionation Handbook. Wiley-Interscience. 2000: 3-30. |
Han et al., Separation of long DNA molecules in a microfabricated entropic trap array. Science. May 12, 2000;288(5468):1026-9. |
Harrison et al., Capillary Electrophoresis and Sample Injection Systems Integrated on a Planar Glass Chip, Anal. Chem. 1992; 64:1926. |
Jacobson et al., Fused Quartz Substrates for Microchip Electrophoresis. Anal Chem. 1995; 67:2059. Abstract Only. |
Krogmeier et al., A Microfluidic Device for Concentrating High Molecular Weight DNA. Mar. 2, 2009; 315a. 1608 Pos. Board B452. Abstract Only. |
Kumar et al., Evaluation of genome sequence scanning technology for molecular (sub)-serotyping of Salmonella and simultaneous detection of multiple Salmonella serovars in complex mixtures. 4th Am Soc for Microbiol (ASM) Meeting on Salmonella. Oct. 9, 2013. Poster. 1 Page. |
Kumar et al., Molecular serotyping and sub-typing of Salmonella strains by genome sequence scanning. Int'l Assoc for Food Protect Ann Mtg. Jul. 31, 2013. Poster. 1 Page. |
Kumar et al., Molecular strain typing of Shiga-toxigenic E. coli (STEC) by genome sequence scanning. Assoc Pub Health Lab Gen Mtg. Jun. 2, 2013. 1 Page. |
Kumar et al., Molecular strain typing of Shiga-toxigenic E. coli (STEC) by genome sequence scanning. Am Soc for Microbiol Gen mtg. May 20, 2013. Poster. 1 Page. |
Kwok et al., An Integrated Multifunction Lab-on-a-Chip Platform for Hugh Throughput Optical Mapping for DNA. Nanotechnology. 2009;48a. 244-Pos. Board B123. Abstract Only. |
Kwok et al., An Integrated Multifunction Lab-on-a-Chip Platform for Hugh Throughput Optical Mapping for DNA. Biophysical Society 53rd Annual Meeting. Feb. 28-Mar. 4, 2009. Boston. Poster. 1 Page. |
Larson et al., Single DNA molecule stretching in sudden mixed shear and elongational microflows. Lab Chip. 2006;6(9):1187-1199. |
Lee et al., Analysis of self-assembled cationic lipid-DNA gene carrier complexes using flow field-flow fractionation and light scattering. Anal Chem. Feb. 15, 2001;73(4):837-43. |
Lee et al., Micro flow cytometers with buried SU-8/SOG optical waveguides. Sensors and Actuators. 2003;103:165-70. |
Lee et al., Mircomachined pre-focused M×N. flow switches for continuous multi-sample injection, J Micromech Microeng. 2001;11:654-661. |
Li et al., Chapter 28. Protein Complexes and Lipoproteins. In: Field Flow Fractionation Handbook. Wiley-Interscience. 2000: 433-470. |
Liu et al., Separation and Measurement of Diffusion Coefficients of Linear and Circular DNAs by Flow Field-Flow Fractionation. Macromolecules. 1993; 26(14):3576-88. |
Lyon et al., 1997, “Confinement and detection of single molecules in submicrometer channels”, Anal. Chem. 69:3400-3405. Abstract. |
Malkin et al., Rapid detection and sub-serotype level typing of bacterial organisms using optical genome sequence scanning. Am Soc Microbiol Gen Meeting. 2013. Poster. 1 Page. |
Meltzer et al., A lab-on-chip for biothreat detection using single-molecule DNA mapping. Lab Chip. Mar. 7, 2011;11(5):863-73. Epub Jan. 20, 2011. Supplemental Material Included. 16 Pages. |
Nie et al., Probing individual molecules with confocal fluorescence microscopy. Science. Nov. 11, 1994;266(5187):1018-21. |
Noller et al., Multilocus sequence typing reveals a lack of diversity among Escherichia coli O157:H7 isolates that are distinct by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. J Clin Microbiol. Feb. 2003;41(2): 675-9. |
Papkov et al., A single-molecule system for detection and quantification of proteins with robust capture units and potential for high multiplexing. Biophysical Society 53rd Annual Meeting. Feb. 28-Mar. 4, 2009. Boston. Poster. 10 Pages. |
Pasquinelli et al., Control of developmental timing by micrornas and their targets. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2002;18:495-513. Epub Apr. 2, 2002. Abstract. |
Phillips et al., Application of single molecule technology to rapidly map long DNA and study the confirmation of stretched DNA. Nuc Acids Res. 2005;33(18):5829-5837. |
Pouseele et al., An Integrated Rapid Strain Typing Solution Combined With a Polyphasic Bioinformatics Tool has the Potential to Considerably Reduce the Time for Routine Outbreak Detection. InFORM 2013: Integrated Foodborne Outbreak Response and Management Meeting. Nov. 19, 2013. Poster. 1 Page. |
Protozanova et al., Binding Specificity of Multi-Labeled PNA Probes Studied by Single Molecule Mapping. Biophysical Society 53rd Annual Meeting. Feb. 28-Mar. 4, 2009. Boston. 25a. 124-Pos. Board B3. Abstract. |
Radcliff et al., Chapter 1. Basics of flow cytometry. In: Methods Mol Biol. 1998;91:1-24. |
Ramaswamy et al., Confirmation and typing of Salmonella by genome sequence scanning in preseumptive positive food samples. Pathogenex Poster. Jul. 30, 2013. 1 Page. |
Ramaswamy et al., Rapid strain typing of Salmonella in food in the presence of competing microflora by genome sequence scanning. Am Soc Microbiol Gen Mtg. May 29, 2013. Poster. 1 Page. |
Roulet et al., Fabrication of multilayer systems combining microfluidic and microoptical elements for fluorescence detection. J Micro Systems. Dec. 2001;10(4):482-91. |
Roulet et al., Performance of an integrated microoptical system for fluorescence detection in microfluidic systems. Anal Chem. Jul. 15, 2002;74(14):3400-7. |
Schmalzing et al., 1997, “DNA typing in thirty seconds with a microfabricated device”, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:10273-10278. |
Schmalzing et al., 1998, “DNA sequencing on microfabricated electrophoretic devices”, Anal. Chem. 70:2303-2310. Abstract Only. |
Shera et al., Detection of single fluorescent molecules. Chem Phys Letts. Nov. 23, 1990;174(6):553-7. |
Soper et al., Nanoliter-scale sample preparation methods directly coupled to polymethylmethacrylate-based microchips and gel-filled capillaries for the analysis of oligonucleotides. J Chromatography A. 1999;853:107-20. |
Wabuyele et al., Single molecule detection of double-stranded DNA in poly(methylmethacrylate) and polycarbonate microfluidic devices. Electrophoresis. Oct. 2001;22(18):3939-48. (Abstract Only). |
Wahlund et al., Application of an asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation channel to the separation and characterization of proteins, plasmids, plasmid fragments, polysaccharides and unicellular algae. J Chromatogr. Jan. 6, 1989;461:73-87. |
Washizu et al., 1990, “Electrostatic manipulation of DNA in microfabricated structures”, IEEE Trans Industry Applications 26:1165-1172. Abstract. |
Watson et al., The early fluidic and optical physics of cytometry. Cytometry. Feb. 15, 1999;38(1):2-14. |
White et al., Staphylococcus aureus strain typing by single-molecule DNA mapping in fluidic microchips with fluorescent tags. Clin Chem. Dec. 2009;55(12):2121-9. Epub Oct. 8, 2009. |
White et al., Staphylococcus aureus strain typing by single-molecule DNA mapping in fluidic microchips with fluorescent tags. Clin Chem. Dec. 2009;55(12):2121-9. Epub 2009 Oct. 8. Supplemental Data. 22 Pages. |
Whitesides et al., Flexible Methods for Microfluidics: Devices for handling nanoliter qualities of fluids are creating new fabrication challenges and finding new applications in biology, chemistry, and materials science. Physics Today Online. Jun. 2001, 8 pages. |
Whitesides et al., Generating Microgradients. Harvard MRSEC—Research Nuggets. Materials Research Science and Engineering Center. Feb. 2, 2001. Available at http://www.mrsec.harvard.edu/research/nugget—4.html. Last accessed Jul. 15, 2002. 1 page. |
Whitesides, Fabrication of Complex, 3D Microstructures. Harvard MRSEC—Research Nuggets. Materials Research Science and Engineering Center. Available at http://www.mrsec.harvard.edu/research/nugget—3.html. Last accessed Jul. 15, 2002. 1 page. |
Whitesides, Three-Dimensional Networks of Fluid Channels in PDMS. Harvard MRSEC—Research Nuggets. Materials Research Science and Engineering Center. Jun. 1, 2000. Available at http://www.mrsec.harvard.edu/research/nugget—11.html. Last accessed Jul. 15, 2002. 1 page. |
Wilding, et al Manipulation and flow of biological fluids in straight channels micromachined in silicon. Clin. Chem. 1994, vol. 40, No. 1, pp. 43-47. |
Wong et al., 2002, “Direct Manipulations of DNA Molecules Using Hydrodynamic Force”, 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Washington D.C. 27 Pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130288234 A1 | Oct 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61625743 | Apr 2012 | US | |
61783601 | Mar 2013 | US |