1. Technical Field
This invention generally relates to firearms. More particularly, the invention relates to a protective device for preventing dust, moisture and other debris from entering the barrel of a firearm. Specifically, the invention relates to a soft, flexible protective cover that frictionally engages and covers the muzzle of a firearm when not in use, but which allows a projectile to be fired therethrough.
2. Background Information
Firearms are particularly vulnerable to dust and moisture that may enter the barrel and cause corrosion and/or interference with the firing of the weapon. This becomes a particular problem in environments such as desert areas where dust is a daunting factor or in tropical or coastal areas where moisture presents an equally serious problem.
Over the years, a number of patents have addressed this issue by disclosing a variety of covers or caps that may be installed over the muzzle of a firearm. These caps are provided to prevent the entry of dust or moisture into the barrel. U.S. Pat. No. 2,385,051 issued to Berlin et al, discloses a two-part protective device that is applied to a firearm. The device includes a tube that slides over and clamps onto a cooling sleeve provided on the muzzle of an aircraft machine gun. A cap piece fits over the end of the tube and covers off the opening to the tube. The tube is designed to block off openings in the cooling sleeve and thereby prevent the ingress of moisture and particulate matter through those openings when the machine gun is not in use.
U.S. Pat. No. 2,465,163 issued to Lockwood discloses a desiccant-filled cartridge that is insertable into the barrel of an aircraft machine gun to soak up moisture that has entered the barrel. A sealing member is pulled over the muzzle of the gun thereby securing the desiccant cartridge in the barrel. This prevents additional moisture and particulate matter from entering the barrel. When the weapon is to be fired, the desiccant-filled cartridge is ejected in the same manner as a regular cartridge.
U.S. Pat. No. 3,354,569 issued to Kassabian discloses a protector that includes a gripping portion which engages the exterior surface of the barrel and a cap assembly that blocks off access to the bore. The gripping portion includes a pair of spaced-apart retaining bands which are sufficiently elastic to grip the barrel. The retaining bands are connected to each other by strips that run along the sides of the barrel. A cap assembly extends over the muzzle and comprises a thin, cylindrical or frusto-conical sheath that extends outwardly away from one of the retaining bands. The front end of the sheath includes a closure that blocks off access to the bore of the weapon. When the firearm is to be fired, the cap assembly is slid off the muzzle, leaving at least the rearward retaining band in place. When the firearm is not in use, the protective cap is reapplied over the muzzle.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,105,571 issued to Kinchin et al discloses a muzzle cap that includes a generally cylindrical sleeve portion which circumscribes the muzzle and covers the opening therein. The cap also includes an external annular ridge that enables the cap to be pulled off the muzzle and an internal annular rib that assists in keeping the cap in gripping contact with a portion of the muzzle.
Currently, the military utilizes a plastic molded cap that slides over the front end of the muzzle and blocks off access to the bore. These plastic caps tend to crack if they are manipulated too much or if the firearm is exposed to adverse conditions, such as extreme temperature changes, for a protracted period of time. Furthermore, because the caps extend across the opening to the bore, if a soldier has an urgent need to fire his weapon, he would either have to shoot through the cap or take the time to remove the cap. Obviously, the latter instance puts the soldier at extreme risk. Furthermore, the military has found that soldiers are reluctant to fire their weapons when the current type of cap used. The reason for this may be the possible production of small pieces of shrapnel as the muzzle cap explodes under the impact of the projectile. The military has noted that soldiers tend not to use these caps and their weapons are consequently vulnerable to particulate matter and moisture.
There is therefore a need in the art for a muzzle cover that will substantially prevent dust and moisture from entering the bore thereof, that is easy to apply to and remove from the muzzle if necessary, and which will readily split apart and disengage from the muzzle upon a projectile being fired from the weapon and thereby substantially eliminating the possibility for injury from shrapnel.
The device of the present invention comprises a soft, flexible and resilient cover that slides over and frictionally engages the front end of a firearm muzzle. The cover comprises a substantially cylindrical sheath that is open at a first end to receive the front end of the muzzle therein and which frictionally engages the external surface of the muzzle. A conically shaped tip extends outwardly from a second end of the sheath. When the sheath is positioned over the front end of the muzzle, the conical tip extends forwardly away therefrom and covers the opening to the barrel. The conical tip may be left in a first position where it extends forwardly and outwardly away from the front of the sheath. Alternatively, the conical tip may be pushed inwardly into the interior of the sheath and thereby into the interior of the barrel. This is accomplished by the application of gentle pressure from a fingertip. The muzzle cover completely disengages from the muzzle when impacted by a projectile that is fired through the barrel of the firearm.
The preferred embodiments of the invention, illustrative of the best mode in which applicant has contemplated applying the principles, are set forth in the following description and are shown in the drawings and are particularly and distinctly pointed out and set forth in the appended claims.
Referring to
In accordance with a specific feature of the present invention, a muzzle cover 24 is provided for closing off access to the opening 26 (
In accordance with a specific feature of the present invention, muzzle cover 24 comprises a sheath section 24a, that is generally cylindrical in shape, and a conical tip 24b. Cover 24 is soft, flexible and lightweight and can be easily manipulated and twisted without tearing or cracking. Cover 24 is also resilient so that it returns to its original shape when released. Cover is manufactured from a natural rubber base that includes a filler which gives the rubber base a higher modulus of stiffness. Furthermore, cover 24 is latex dipped instead of being mold injected as are the currently known plastic muzzle covers. The walls of sheath section 24a and tip 24b are between 0.020 and 0.030 inches thick and preferably are 0.025 inches thick. This makes the walls of cover 24 between 40% and 60% thinner than currently used plastic caps which typically are 0.050 inches thick.
Referring to
When sheath 24a is not engaged with muzzle 14, the bore 38 is of a substantially constant diameter along its entire length “L”. The diameter of bore 38 will be slightly less than the exterior diameter of muzzle 14 that cover 24 is to be applied to. Consequently, when cover 24 is applied over muzzle 14, it tightly engages the exterior surface 40 of muzzle 14. Wall 28 of cover 24 is also substantially planar along its entire length “L” and is free of any projections extending either inwardly or outwardly away therefrom. Because of the flexible nature of cover 24, the diameter of bore 38 may become slightly distorted when cover 24 is applied over muzzle 14. Wall 28 and bore 38 are complementary sized and shaped to frictionally engage exterior surface 40 of muzzle 14 and to be retained thereon without any additional assistance or components. The interior surface 30 (
In accordance with another specific feature of the present invention, conical tip 24b is integrally formed with sheath 24a and extends from second end 34 of wall 28. Tip 24b is connected to second end 34 at an annular collar 36. Collar 36 is disposed at a first angle relative to wall 28 and at a second angle relative to tip 24b. Muzzle cover 24 is sufficiently thin and flexible enough that tip 24b may be depressed inwardly (
Muzzle cover 24 is used in the following manner. Peripheral wall 28 of cover 24 is lightly grasped between the forefinger and thumb of the user's hand. Cover 24 is brought into contact with front end 20 of muzzle 14 and front end 20 is slid into bore 38 of cover 24 in the direction of arrow “A” (
While tip 24b covers opening 26, it should be understood that even when tip 24b is in the second position, the barrel of the firearm 10 is not plugged. A plugged bore 16 would spell disaster for the soldier as it would cause the muzzle 14 to explode when a projectile 18 is fired through muzzle 14. A projectile 18 can readily be fired through tip 24b when tip 24b is in either of the first and second positions. The tip 24b does not prevent the projectile from exiting the muzzle 14 in any way. Cover 24 is essentially useful for preventing particulate materials from plugging or blocking bore 16.
When cover 24 is in the first position extending conically outwardly away from front end 20a of muzzle 14, cover 24 will tend to reduce air, wind and water drag on weapon 10, such as when a paratrooper exits a plane, for example. However, when cover 24 is in the second position, the soldier's potential vulnerability is reduced by eliminating the potential for enemy combatants to assume that the weapon 10 is not ready for engagement as it will not be apparent that anything is applied to cover the opening 26 to the muzzle 14.
Furthermore, it should be understood that a projectile 18 can be fired through cover 24 when in either of the first and second positions. The second position is, however, slightly more favorable for ensuring that cover 24 will completely disengage from weapon 10 because of the cover's 24 more snug fit when in this second position.
In accordance with yet another feature of the present invention, when a projectile 18 is fired from firearm 10, cover 24 is soft enough, flexible enough and of a suitable length to be completely disengaged from muzzle 14 by projectile 18 as it exits muzzle 14. Referring to
In the foregoing description, certain terms have been used for brevity, clearness, and understanding. No unnecessary limitations are to be implied therefrom beyond the requirement of the prior art because such terms are used for descriptive purposes and are intended to be broadly construed.
Moreover, the description and illustration of the invention are an example and the invention is not limited to the exact details shown or described.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
44631 | Hull | Oct 1864 | A |
540748 | Layton | Jun 1895 | A |
1089086 | Sikes | Mar 1914 | A |
1499460 | Kennedy | Jul 1924 | A |
1537517 | Wheeling | May 1925 | A |
2385051 | Berlin et al. | Sep 1945 | A |
2465163 | Lockwood | Mar 1949 | A |
2545473 | Kremkau | Mar 1951 | A |
2557277 | Gibson | Jun 1951 | A |
2558792 | Snowden | Jul 1951 | A |
2906175 | Mohaupt | Sep 1959 | A |
2983063 | Douville et al. | May 1961 | A |
3063184 | Sukala, Jr. | Nov 1962 | A |
3354569 | Kassabian | Nov 1967 | A |
3455047 | Hoag | Jul 1969 | A |
3593451 | McDonnell | Jul 1971 | A |
3653564 | Carter | Apr 1972 | A |
3813802 | Di Prospero | Jun 1974 | A |
3849923 | Hawkins | Nov 1974 | A |
4084340 | Scudder | Apr 1978 | A |
4280644 | Shindelka | Jul 1981 | A |
D271126 | Doak | Oct 1983 | S |
4817322 | Dietz et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4922642 | Ohlhauser | May 1990 | A |
5046276 | Morris | Sep 1991 | A |
5105571 | Kinchin et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
6269579 | Warner | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6722073 | Cossio | Apr 2004 | B2 |
7234264 | Cole | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7506572 | Hombeck | Mar 2009 | B1 |
20030005614 | Cossio | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20050183321 | Brown | Aug 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110000122 A1 | Jan 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60842691 | Sep 2006 | US |