1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to a device for producing a rotating flow in a flow duct which comprises a flue-gas outlet of an incineration plant, in particular of a garbage incineration plant.
2. Discussion of the Prior Art
Such devices are used in order to regulate by means of the injected media the composition of the flue-gas mixture conveyed through the flow duct of an incineration plant and the temperature and dwell time of the flue-gas mixture. However, the composition, temperature and dwell time are not only to be regulated but in particular are also to be evened out. In this way, optimum secondary combustion of the flue-gas mixture can be ensured and the desired, low emission values can be maintained. This necessitates complete intermixing of the flue-gas mixture. Attempts are made to achieve this complete intermixing by producing rotating flows in the flow duct by means of devices having appropriate nozzle arrangements.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,252,298, for example, discloses a device of the generic type. The nozzles arranged in a plane are oriented tangentially to an imaginary circle in the center of the flow duct, so that a rotating flow is produced in the flow duct. In a device disclosed by DE-A-19 648 639, the flow rate is controlled by means of nozzles arranged opposite one another in the flow duct in such a way that at least two flows rotating in opposition are obtained in the flow duct. The problem with these known rotating flows consists in the fact that a virtually vortex-free eye arises in the center of the flow, with the result that complete intermixing and thus uniform composition, temperature distribution and dwell time are not obtained.
The object of the present invention is therefore to provide an efficient device with which complete intermixing of flue-gas mixtures in the flow duct of an incineration plant is obtained.
Due to the special arrangement, pursuant to the present invention, of first nozzles in an injection plane in at least one first wall section per wall, which wall section is diagonally opposite the at least one first wall section of the opposite wall and due to the orientation of the first nozzles in the injection plane in such a way that the angle lying in the injection plane between the wall and an injected jet is at least approximately 90°, a rotating flow is produced in the flow duct on the one hand and very good intermixing of the flue-gas mixture is achieved on the other hand. In this case, “diagonally opposite” means that the first wall sections, for the swirling of the flowing material in the projection approximately in the direction of the jet flowing in through the first nozzles, do not overlap or only partly overlap laterally. In particular, a distribution of first nozzles over first wall sections having a length l of 50% and more ensures that jets of injected media pass right into the center of the flow duct. By the sum L of the lengths of the first wall sections of one wall being at least approximately 40% up to 80% of the total wall width b, i.e. by the first nozzles extending only over part of the width b of the wall, material costs and assembly costs for the nozzles are saved, the efficiency of the intermixing being maintained.
In a special embodiment, in addition to the first nozzles, second nozzles are provided in the injection plane in a second wall section at an angle β relative to the first nozzles and oriented diagonally toward the center of the flow duct, a factor which further improves the intermixing. A plurality of first wall sections and in particular also a plurarlity of second wall sections having first and second nozzles respectively are preferably provided for each wall, so that vortex regions having vortices rotating in opposite directions are produced, which further improves the intermixing.
It is especially advantageous to orient the second nozzles with an injection component in the downstream direction at an angle α relative to the injection plane. In this case, each of the second nozzles having an injection component may be at a different angle α relative to the injection plane or else all the second nozzles inject jets with an injection component into the flow duct in the same plane tilted by the angle α relative to the injection plane. In this way, the jets of these nozzles can be set in such a way that they flow helically into one another.
In a further preferred embodiment, first nozzles are arranged in a first wall section on all four walls defining the flow duct. In this case, the first wall sections lie in the peripheral direction against the rotating flow in each case at the start of a wall, so that they are at a distance from the first wall section of the adjacent wall and do not touch one another. Due to this distribution of the first wall sections and their length of more than 0.5b, a very good rotating flow can be produced, and optimum intermixing of the flue-gas mixture can be achieved by the injection from all four sides right into the center of the flow duct.
It is especially advantageous to arrange the nozzles of all four walls in one injection plane. However, the nozzles may also be arranged in two parallel injection planes which are at a distance from one another in the direction of flow, opposite nozzles being arranged in one plane.
Wall sections which are centrosymmetrically opposite one another are ideally the same length.
Fresh secondary air and/or recirculated flue gas is advantageously injected. If fresh secondary air and recirculated flue gas are injected, annular gap nozzles are preferably provided. In this case, the core jet of the annular gap nozzles consists of recirculated flue gas and the annular jet consists of fresh secondary air.
A control system by means of which the flow rates of the media to be emitted in the form of jets can be controlled independently of one another at least for nozzles arranged on opposite walls is especially advantageous.
If at least one injection plane is arranged in the region of a flame cover of the incineration plant, the flame cover being situated in the transition region between a combustion chamber and the flue-gas outlet, in addition to the intermixing and regulation of the flue-gas mixture, cooling of the flame cover exposed to very high thermal loading is achieved by the injection of the media to be emitted in the form of jets.
The various features of novelty which characterize the invention are pointed out with particularity in the claims annexed to and forming a part of the disclosure. For a better understanding of the invention, its operating advantages, and specific objects attained by its use, reference should be had to the drawing and descriptive matter in which there are illustrated and described preferred embodiments of the invention.
In a purely schematic manner in
a, b show a first embodiment of the device according to the invention, with first nozzles and second nozzles arranged on two opposite walls of a rectangular flow duct,
a, b, c show a second embodiment of the device with an arrangement of the nozzles similar to that from
a, b show a third embodiment of the device with first nozzles on all four walls of the rectangular flow duct in an injection plane with a representation analogous to
a, b show a fourth embodiment of the device with first nozzles on all four walls of the rectangular flow duct, the nozzles being distributed in two parallel injection planes which are at a distance from one another in the direction of flow, specifically in each case first nozzles opposite one another in one injection plane and with a representation analogous to
In
All the embodiments shown in
In all the examples, the injection plane 22 lies in the region of the flame cover 14, which is arranged in the transition region 20 between flue-gas outlet 10 and combustion chamber 12. The flame cover 14 either has nozzles 24 passing through it itself, as shown in all four examples, and/or it is “flushed from below” with media which can be emitted in the form of a jet, as shown in
Shown in
Shown in
In the example shown in
Depending on the design of the flow duct 18 and the configuration of the walls 26, it may be necessary, whether for optimization of the flow or even because the four walls 26 cannot be provided with nozzles 24a in a single plane, to arrange the nozzles 24a in two injection planes 22 and 22* parallel to one another, as shown in
All the nozzles are designed in such a way that media to be injected can be injected at a pressure of 500 Pa to 5000 Pa.
Shown in
The different conditions as may prevail on various sides of the flow duct 18 can be taken into account more effectively via a control system 48, as shown in
To regulate the temperature and the O2 content and to achieve as long as possible a minimum dwell time of the flue-gas mixture flowing through the flow duct, nozzles 24 for secondary air and nozzles 24 for recirculated flue gas are preferably provided. These nozzles 24 may either be arranged in mixed configuration next to one another in a row or also in two rows one above the other, so that a separate injection plane 22 is obtained for each nozzle type 24. If annular gap nozzles 24* are provided, the core jet consists of flue gas and the annular jet consists of secondary air, as described for
The embodiments shown here do not describe the invention in a definitive manner. Thus it is possible, for example, to also use the device in incineration plants and garbage incineration plants in which the transition region 20 between combustion chamber 12 and flue-gas outlet 10 is characterized by a constriction. Further injection planes 22 may also be provided at a lower level in the combustion chamber 12 or further up in the flue-gas outlet 10. Instead of or in addition to flue gas and secondary air, other media, such as steam, activated carbon, open-hearth coke, waste, e.g. in the course of residue recycling, fuels and the like, may also be injected. The device may also be used in order to obtain a reducing atmosphere. In the same direction of rotation as the first nozzles 24a, burners may be arranged 2 m to 3 m above the injection plane 22 on two opposite walls 26.
The invention is not limited by the embodiments described above which are presented as examples only but can be modified in various ways within the scope of protection defined by the appended patent claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1585/99 | Aug 1999 | CH | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3788796 | Krippene et al. | Jan 1974 | A |
4570551 | Derbidge et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4810186 | Rennert et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
5020456 | Khinkis et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5078064 | Breen et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5252298 | Jones | Oct 1993 | A |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
196 48 639 | Apr 1998 | DE |
197 05 938 | Aug 1998 | DE |
55-105104 | Aug 1980 | JP |
62-18802 | May 1987 | JP |
4-55609 | Feb 1992 | JP |
5-26421 | May 1993 | JP |
5-113208 | May 1993 | JP |
6-272836 | Jun 1994 | JP |
7-103440 | Apr 1995 | JP |
10-205734 | Aug 1998 | JP |
10-288325 | Oct 1998 | JP |
11-51367 | Feb 1999 | JP |
WO 95 35409 | Dec 1995 | WO |