The invention is explained in greater detail by means of the examples shown in
The cam lobe and the position of the contour of the finished part, as well as the lower and upper tolerance limits of the contour of the unfinished part are shown in
Parallel to this, the camshaft 1 is brought into the grinding machine 3 for processing by means of an appropriate transfer manipulation 14, such as a robot. The data, required for controlling the grinding machine, I transferred over control signal leads 12a and 12b and the camshaft 1 is ground in accordance with the control program selected.
In a modification of the method described above, the camshaft, after the contour of the unfinished part is measured, is marked clearly (for example, with a bar code) and an identification signal for identifying the camshaft in the grinding machine is also transferred over the control lead 12a to the control unit 4. The marking contains information about the contour of the unfinished part measured or the grinding program that is to be selected. Subsequently, the control unit 4 selects the appropriate grinding program from an allocation of identification signals to the grinding programs.
In an alternative embodiment, the control unit 4, starting out from the identification signal, requests the grinding program from the plant control computer 5.
Pursuant to the invention, the plant control computer 5 and the control unit 4 may be integrated in one computer unit 15. The precise configuration of the computer unit may, however, be very different. The data leads 9, 10, 11, 12a, 12b may also be integrated in a bus system, as is customary in mechanical engineering.
The prior art and the inventive method are compared by means of Table 1 and
The grinding wheel must be delivered at such a rate, that it does not dip into the surface of the workpiece at the highest speed used for moving the wheel up to the workpiece.
In accordance with the state of the art, as shown in the left half of Table 1, the grinding wheel is therefore moved up to the enveloping curve 18 for the largest possible oversize. Subsequently, a certain delivery path is covered for each revolution of the workpiece until, in the last step, which is the seventh revolution here, there is “free sparking” with a delivery of 0 mm and the workpiece has been ground to the finished contour 16. According to the prior art, this means 7 deliveries with a total delivery path of 0.5 mm. The whole process time then is approximately 7 seconds, for example.
As can be seen from the Table, the delivery, however, was carried out for a distance of 0.15 mm with a speed, adapted for the grinding, although no material was ground off. This process is also referred to as air grinding in the industry.
This air grinding is eliminated completely with the inventive method, as shown in the right half of Table 1. Delivery takes place directly to the enveloping curve of the measured oversize, which is +0.35 mm here. The grinding operation is completed in 5 further revolutions of the workpiece. In the example given, the process time saved is about 2 seconds per cam lobe.
As furthermore shown in Table 1, the deliveries for the first two revolutions are greater in the case of the inventive method than in the case of the prior art. An advantageous further development of the method is shown here, for which the delivery rate is adapted to the thickness of the oversize. For relatively large oversizes, grinding is usually carried out at a high delivery rate (rough machining). Only when the oversize is small is the delivery rate lowered (finishing, fine finishing or spark machining). The high delivery rate during the rough machining must be such that excessive power is not introduced into the workspace and that, correspondingly, there is no overheating of the workpiece. For example, for an oversize of 0.500 mm, a delivery of 0.400 mm per 4 revolutions up to an allowance of 0.100 mm and a corresponding introduction of power may be provided. However, if the oversize is only 0.350 mm, this delivery can even be increased up to and allowance of 0.100 mm. However, the total delivery must not exceed the value of the original power introduction. The time-shaving volume may be used as a measure of this.
Over and above the advantages described, the inventive method offers further important advantages. For example, the measurement enables the shafts, for which the contour of the unfinished part of the functional components is already too small, that is, no longer lies within the tolerance range, to be sorted out before the grinding. In this case, the shaft can no longer meet specifications, so that grinding no longer is necessary. As a result, rejects are not processed further and the processing times and costs, required for this, are saved.
An even larger advantage can be seen therein that workpieces having an oversize, which goes beyond the maximum permissible enveloping curve 18, can be processed without sequential damage, so that it becomes possible to lower the tolerance requirements partly or for the time of particular production problems.
Furthermore, the quality of unfinished parts can be specified with a statistical range, so that early recognition of problems in the offing in the case of future manufacturing processes becomes possible.
It is obvious that the method and device described here can also be used for components other than constructed camshafts. For example they may also be used for cast and forged camshafts, crankshafts, control shafts and for the grinding of points of support for transmission shafts.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2004 009 352.0 | Feb 2004 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP05/01326 | 2/10/2005 | WO | 00 | 6/5/2007 |