The present invention relates to a device for providing a controllable pressure reduction between a first fluid conducting pipe and a second fluid conducting pipe.
Nozzles are commonly used as pressure reduction devices to provide a pressure reduction in a fluid. However, there are several technical challenges involved with this technology. First of all, the maximal pressure reduction across one nozzle should be limited, in order to prevent unacceptable velocities in the nozzle throat which amongst other can cause problems with noise, vibration, erosion and cavitation. Another major drawback when using nozzles are furthermore that the loss coefficients found in literature depends on the Reynolds number (laminar/turbulent flow). Limited and somewhat uncertain data is available at lower Reynolds numbers (turbulent flow). The nozzle loss coefficient versus Reynolds number is not well understood and becomes more and more uncertain as the Reynolds number moves into the transient and laminar range of Reynolds numbers.
If a large pressure reduction is required, several nozzles must be connected serially. There must be a certain distance between each nozzle to avoid that they interact on each other hence influencing the actual pressure drop versus estimated. That is, there must be sufficient distance between adjacent nozzles to dissipate the energy in the fluid jet in the bulk fluid and to reestablish a fully developed flow regime prior to reaching the next nozzle in series for the loss coefficients versus Reynolds numbers to be valid. Hence, the total length of the pressure reduction device may be very long if the required pressure drop is large.
Pressure reduction devices are for example used for reducing the pressure of fluids used during hydrocarbon (oil/gas) production, such as fluids flowing from oil and/or gas wells, control fluids, water injection fluids etc. Such fluids may comprise particles, debris etc which may obstruct the fluid flow. In subsea installations it is important that equipment is reliable and does not get obstructed or clogged, since maintenance and repair operations are expensive and complicated.
Moreover, the operation of the nozzle should be predictable and controllable. However, nozzle behavior is not well characterized at low Reynolds numbers, where the fluid may vary between so-called turbulent flow and so-called laminar flow. Hence, the output pressure of such pressure reduction devices is not always controllable under such operation conditions, which is undesired or unacceptable in certain applications.
The object of the present invention is to provide a device for providing a controllable pressure reduction, where the disadvantages above are avoided.
The present invention relates to a device for providing a controllable pressure reduction between a first fluid conducting pipe and a second fluid conducting pipe, characterized in that the device comprises:
In an aspect of the invention, the pressure reduction channel is provided in a main body fastened between an end of the first fluid conducting pipe and an end of the second fluid conducting pipe.
In an aspect of the invention, the pressure reduction channel is provided in an insert body inserted into an opening of the main body.
In an aspect of the invention, the insert body comprises a first section and a second section, where the pressure reduction channel is provided as a recess in the first section.
In an aspect of the invention, the insert body is cylindrical.
In an aspect of the invention, the first section and second section has a semicircular cross sectional shape.
In an aspect of the invention, the length of the pressure reduction channel is longer than the length of the device.
In an aspect of the invention, the pressure reduction channel is S-shaped, spiral shaped, sinus shaped etc.
In an aspect of the invention, the device further comprises connectors for pressure safe connection of the fluid inlet and the fluid outlet respectively to the respective ends of the first and second fluid conducting pipes.
In an aspect of the invention, connector comprises recesses for packer elements.
In an aspect of the invention, the device comprises threaded openings for fastening to the respective ends of the pipes by means of threaded bolts.
In an aspect of the invention, the relationship between the channel length L and the side length s or the relationship between the channel length L and the diameter d of the channel should be large, for example 200 or more.
In an aspect of the invention, the relationship between the channel length L and the side length s or the relationship between the channel length L and the diameter d of the channel is in the range 600-1200.
In an aspect of the invention, the relationship between the channel length L and the side length s or the relationship between the channel length L and the diameter d of the channel is approximately 1200.
Embodiments and aspects of the present invention will now be described with reference to the enclosed drawings, where:
It is now referred to
It should be noted that the term “controllable” here is used to express “to keep control” of the pressure reduction, i.e. the pressure reduction should be predictable for all Reynolds numbers. For high Reynolds numbers a controllable or predictable pressure reduction is achieved. Moreover, also for low Reynolds numbers, where the fluid may vary between so-called turbulent flow, so-called intermediate or transient flow and so-called laminar flow. Hence, the term “controllable” as used herein does not mean “adjustable”.
The device 10 comprises a fluid inlet 11 in fluid communication with the first fluid conducting pipe 1 and a fluid outlet 12 in fluid communication with the second fluid conducting pipe 2. A fluid communicating, pressure reduction channel 14 is provided between the fluid inlet 11 and the fluid outlet 12. Hence, fluid may flow from pipe 1 into the fluid inlet 11, further through the channel 14 and out via the fluid outlet 12 to the pipe 2.
The fluid communicating, pressure reduction channel 14 reduces the pressure in the fluid due to frictional losses between the fluid in the channel and the walls of the channel 14. This will be explained in detail below.
The device 10 may comprise a main body 13. The main body 13 is fastened between the end 1a of the first fluid conducting pipe 1 and the end 2a of the second fluid conducting pipe. The pressure reduction channel 14 may be provided in the main body 13.
The main body may have an external cylindrical shape, as shown in the drawings, however other shapes may be possible, depending on the application etc.
Moreover, the device may comprise fastening means for fastening to the respective ends 1a, 2a, as shown in
In the embodiment shown in
The insert body 15 will now be described with reference to
The first section 15a and the second section 15b may be welded to each other or may be fastened to each other by other means before insertion into the main body 13.
The insert body 15 may have a substantially circular end surface 17 in each end, as indicated in
In the following, a calculation model for the frictional losses will be explained. The total frictional pressure loss is given by:
The hydraulic diameter is defined as:
The friction factor f depends on the Reynolds number which is defined as:
The flow is laminar if the Reynolds number is below 2000, in the critical zone between 2000 and 4000 and turbulent above 4000.
For turbulent flow the friction factor f can be estimated using the Colebrook-White equation:
The friction factor for laminar flow depends on the actual geometry. The effective diameter approach is used for non-circular ducts. The following relations apply for circular ducts and non-circular ducts:
The laminar friction constant for rectangles with height/with ratios going from 0 to 1 can be obtained through the following curve fit:
Here, a and b are width and height of a rectangle. The curve fit is based on a table for loss coefficients, table 7.6 in “Fundamentals of fluid mechanics” by Philip M. Gerhart and Richard J. Gross, 1985 (ISBN 0-201-1410-0)
The effective diameter is given by:
And the friction factor for use in the pressure drop calculations is given by:
It is recommended to use linear interpolation between laminar and turbulent friction factor in the critical zone. That is, the turbulent friction factor assuming Reh equal to 4000 and the laminar friction factor is estimated assuming a Reynolds number of 2000. The effective friction factor is then estimated from:
The pressure reduction channel 14 may have a square, semicircular or rectangular cross sectional shape, or another suitable cross sectional shape. The cross sectional area may typically be 0.2-5 mm2, preferably 1-3 mm2 depending on the required pressure drop, the fluid viscosity, particle size of the fluid to avoid obstructions etc.
In the embodiment in
The required length of the pressure reduction channel 14 should be performed based on the above calculations and assumptions. In the embodiment shown in
As shown, the pressure reduction channel 14 is longer than the length of the device 10. Consequently, the size of the pressure reducing device can be decreased further.
As shown in
It should be mentioned that if a corresponding pressure reduction device should be provided by means of serially connected nozzles for use in the same area of application as the present invention, it would have been considerably longer.
The device 10 may further comprise connectors 18 for pressure safe connection of the fluid inlet 11 and the fluid outlet 12 respectively to the respective ends 1a, 2a of the first and second fluid conducting pipes 1, 2. An embodiment of the connector 18 is shown in detail in
The connector 18 is substantially cylindrical and comprises a central fluid communicating channel 40 in its longitudinal direction. The fluid communicating channel 40 provides fluid communication between the ends of the insert body 15 and the pipes 1, 2 respectively, as shown in
The connector 18 further comprises recesses 42, 43, adapted for packer elements (not shown) such as o-rings etc as pressure barriers. Packer elements can be provided in recesses 42 as a pressure barrier between the main body 13 and the connector 18, and packer elements can be provided in the recesses 43 as a pressure barrier between the end flange of the ends 1a, 2a respectively and the connectors 18.
It is now referred to
The large squares represent measured pressure drop at different flow rates when testing the embodiment shown in
For the design of the pressure reduction channel 14, the relationship between the length and the diameter is of particular interest. The following table shows the relationship for some relevant values:
As shown in the table, the relationship L/s (s is side length of square channel) or relationship L/d (d is diameter in case of a circular channel) should be large, for example 200 or more. In other embodiment, these relationships L/s or L/d could be even larger, for example in the range 600-1200.
In the embodiment shown in the drawings, the relationship L/s is ca 1200. Of course, as the table shows, these relationships L/s or L/d could be even larger.
In the description above, the pressure reduction channel 14 is provided as one and only one continuous channel between the fluid inlet 11 and the fluid outlet 12. Hence, since the diameter of the one pressure reduction channel 14 is smaller than the diameter of the first fluid conducting pipe and a second fluid conducting pipe, the fluid will get increased flow velocity when flowing through the pressure reduction channel. Under some operation conditions, this may cause the flow to change from the laminar or transient phase to turbulent phase.
There are several alternative embodiments of the present invention. For example, the pressure reduction channel 14 may be provided as a recess in the second section 15b or as a recess in both the first and the second sections 15a, 15b of the insert body 15.
Moreover, the pressure reduction channel may have other shapes than the S-shaped form described above. In an alternative embodiment, the channel 14 may be sinus shaped, as illustrated in
In yet an alternative embodiment, the channel may comprise two S-shaped channels is series, as shown in
In yet an alternative embodiment, the channel may comprise two S-shaped channels located over each other, as shown in
In yet an alternative embodiment, the insert body may be a cylinder (which is not dived in two subsections), where the channel 14 may be provide as a recess in the outer surface. In such an embodiment, the channel may be shaped like a spiral as shown in
It should be mentioned that the pressure reduction channel 14 may have other forms than rectangular, square or circular, for example it could be triangular or polygonal.
According to the invention, it is achieved a device for providing a controllable pressure reduction between a first fluid conducting pipe and a second fluid conducting pipe, i.e. the device is behaving in a controllable or predictable manner so that a predetermined pressure drop is achieved also for fluids with low Reynolds numbers.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20090074 | Jan 2009 | NO | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/NO10/00005 | 1/7/2010 | WO | 00 | 9/14/2011 |