The present invention relates to a device for reducing noise pollution and equipment which comprises at least one example of this device.
Noise pollution does not solely consist of unwanted noise where it is desirable to attenuate the sound volume of the noise, especially if it is not possible to eliminate the source of such noise. Noise pollution comprises anything which adversely affects the audibility of an audible message. For example, part of a sound signal emitted in a room is reflected inwards by the walls of the room where it is added to the original sound signal and degrades its intelligibility.
The user is reminded that the energy of a sound wave which strikes a wall is partly reflected by the wall, partly transmitted through the wall and partly absorbed by the wall, i.e. dissipated by friction as heat.
The use of sound attenuation barriers or screens to protect an environment against a sound source is widespread. For example, such sound attenuation bathers are found along sections of traffic lanes and around industrial plant which creates noise. Current sound attenuation barriers are generally designed mainly to reflect sound waves, although the reduction in noise annoyance on one side of a sound attenuation barrier generally results in an increase in noise annoyance on the other side where the noise source is located.
Also, the use of acoustic panels to improve the acoustic comfort of spaces with these panels covering, at least locally, the walls which delineate such spaces which can be movie theatres, bedrooms, recording studios or conference rooms, is known. The acoustic panels used generally comprise one or more thicknesses of a porous material which may, for instance, be in the form of a layer of bonded fibers in which medium and high-frequency sound waves are well attenuated by absorption. However, such panels do not make it possible to attenuate low-frequency sounds satisfactorily unless they are extremely thick, of the order of 1 m thick, a dimension which is prohibitive in many applications.
A solution which affords protection against low-frequency sound waves is proposed in document FR-2 836 497. In this solution, acoustic panels are arranged in front of a wall to which they are attached so that they are elastically supported. To achieve this, special-purpose support devices are placed between the acoustic panels and the wall. Each of them comprises an elastic member via which part of the weight of the acoustic panel is transferred into the wall. This elastic member must therefore be adequately dimensioned to be capable of supporting part of the weight of an acoustic panel. This makes it necessary to choose a highly rigid elastic member and this makes it impossible to obtain satisfactory attenuation of low-frequency sound waves.
The object of the invention is to at least improve the reduction of noise pollution, especially low-frequency noise.
According to the invention, this object is achieved thanks to a device for reducing noise pollution that comprises an acoustic panel and at least one member for elastically holding said panel, this holding member including a first and second mounting means for installing the same between a support and the acoustic panel and a spring portion provided between the first and second mounting means. The device for reducing noise pollution is characterized in that said holding member comprises a tab having one end connected to the second mounting means and bearing, at a distance from said end, the first mounting means so that a movement of the acoustic panel perpendicularly to the main faces thereof is permitted by an elastic deformation of the spring portion in the tilting direction of the tab relative to the second mounting means.
In case of horizontal vibration of the acoustic panel, the tab of the holding member or each holding member acts like a lever arm and makes the spring portion of the holding member operate in torsion around at least one axis relative to which the moment of the weight of the acoustic panel is slight or even zero. Because of this, the rigidity of the spring portion can be dimensioned taking primarily acoustic considerations into account rather than the load which the holding member is designed to bear. More precisely, this rigidity can be sufficiently low for the acoustic panel to be able to vibrate horizontally easily, especially perpendicularly to its main faces, even though it is adequately vertically supported.
In addition, the tab of the holding member increases the torque which a horizontal force acting on the panel produces on the spring portion of that holding member.
Other advantageous aspects of this device for reducing noise pollution may include the following:
The object of the invention is also an equipment which comprises a support characterized in that it comprises a device such as that defined above, the acoustic panel whereof is mounted on the support so that it is substantially vertical by means, in particular, of at least one example of the holding member.
Other advantageous aspects of this equipment may include the following:
The invention will be made more readily understandable by the following description which is given merely by way of example and relates to the accompanying drawings in which:
Members 3 are simple and inexpensive to manufacture. One of them is shown on its own in
At a distance from spring 6, tab 5 comprises a closed loop 9 which delimits a space 10 through which the shank of a fastener such as the screw referenced 11 in
Suspension tab 7 slants, i.e. it slopes relative to the vertical and horizontal. This tab 7 and hook 8 extend in a vertical plane P which is substantially perpendicular to one axis X1-X′1 of spring 6. Hook 8 curves around an axis X2-X′2 which is substantially parallel to axis X1-X′1.
Suspension tab 7 is angularly offset from tab 5, around an axis which is parallel to axis X1-X′1, by an angle which is denoted a in
Suspension tab 7 can be tilted relative to tab 5 in plane P downwards and upwards, i.e. in a direction in which angle α increases or reduces due to elastic deformation of spring 6; this is depicted by the opposite arrows F1 in
Because the turns of the spring are not adjacent, spring 6 can also easily deform in the direction of an angular movement of its two ends relative to each other around an axis which is orthogonal to axis X1-X′1. This allows lateral tilting F2 of suspension tab 7 away from vertical plane P in a plane which is parallel to axis X1-X′1, relative to tab 5.
As shown in
The members 3 of device 4 are divided up into an upper member and two lower members, one of which can be seen in
Panel 1 is supported by lower members 3, the lower edge of layer 12 rests on the hooks 8 of the members. An upper edge of this layer 12 is fastened to hook 8 of upper member 3 which turns back on itself for this purpose relative to lower members 3. The axes X1-X′1 of springs 6 are substantially horizontal and parallel to panel 1 and wall 2. The same applies to axes X2-X′2. The rear main face 14A of panel 1 faces wall 2, from which it is separated by an air gap 15.
The above description shows that device 4 can be installed easily and quickly.
Because of the significant slope of tabs 7 of lower members 3 which means that their hooks 8 are lower than their springs 6, the moment of the weight of panel 1 with respect to the axes X1-X′1 of the springs 6 is low. The weight of panel 1 is therefore only a minor consideration when dimensioning springs 6 and the springs can therefore not be very stiff in order to facilitate horizontal vibration of panel 1.
Panel 1 can vibrate perpendicularly to its main faces 14A and 14B, as shown in
Panel 1 can also vibrate parallel to its main faces 14A and 14B in the direction shown by the double-headed arrow V in
Tests were conducted in rooms as shown in
Measurements were performed simultaneously in room 21 and room 22 using a microphone 26 located between the two pairs of devices 4 and a microphone 27 located in room 22 close to partition 23. Identical measurements for the same sound produced by sound source 24 were performed without devices 4 in room 21 as well as when each of these devices 4 was replaced by panel 1 fixed by spacers in the form of foam blocks.
The results of the tests conducted under the conditions described below are summarized in the following table:
The above table shows that devices 4 reduce the sound volume both in room 21 and room 22. The noise reduction in rooms 21 and 22 is due to a large part of the energy of the sound waves being effectively absorbed by devices 4. It was established that this absorption occurs in low, medium and high frequencies as illustrated by comparing the curves in
In
In addition, comparing the reverberation times obtained in the various configurations tested and comparing the clearness indexes obtained in the same configurations shows that the presence of devices 4 is also accompanied by undeniable gains in terms of perceived acoustics.
Besides this, the standing-wave ratio in room 21 was reduced when devices 4 were present; this results in increased homogeneity of the acoustic field; this homogeneity is important, in particular, when listening to music.
It should be noted that the performance stated above was obtained when room 21 was only partially fitted with devices 4. Even better performance can therefore be expected when a greater number of devices 4 is installed in room 21, especially in front of partition 23.
Acoustic panel 101 is a sandwich panel comprising two layers 113 which can be made of cotton wool or another material and between which there is a composite fiber glass layer 112. This panel 101 is mounted using two pairs of members 103 in an opening 30 delimited by a frame shaped support 102. Frame 102 comprises two uprights, each of which bears a pair of members 103 arranged along the lateral edge of panel 101.
Tab 107 of each member 103 comprises a pair of reverse bends 31 and 32 which inwardly displace a hook 108 relative to spring 106 which is part of the same member 103 as hook 108. In this respect, it should be noted that the two members 103 on the same side of panel 101 differ from each other in that bends 31 and 32 of one member are reversed compared with bends 31 and 32 of the other member.
Thus, as shown in
As shown in
Each panel 201 is mounted on the wall 202 by means of four mounting systems which are located at each of its corners. Thus, as shown in
As can be seen in
Member 203 is shown on its own in
A bend 261 which is substantially at right angles links tab 207 to hook 208, thanks to which this hook 208 is tilted a quarter turn relative to tab 207 so that it protrudes forwardly and, because of this, can be inserted in a retention clip 262 which is rigidly associated with rim 250 of panel 201. Every panel 201 has four clips 262 into which four hooks 208 are inserted at the time the panel is mounted so that the panel is subsequently secured thereto.
Every base 252A is part of one of several mounting systems 251A which are located at the left and right ends of rows of panels 201. Every mounting system 251B is located in a gap which separates two consecutive panels 201.
A simple easy-to-perform action is enough to lock key 253 in the position in which member 203 is secured once the tip of this key has been inserted in mounting portion 256. This action involves pivoting key 253 a quarter of a turn, as indicated by arrow A in
Although they are advantageous in terms of ease of assembly, keys 253 can be replaced by traditional screws, subject to portions 256 being adapted accordingly.
The invention is not confined to the embodiments described above. In particular, the number of members 3 or 103 in a device 4 or 104 may differ from those stated above.
Also, tab 5 or 105 of a member 3 or 103 can be fixed to acoustic panel 1 or 101, in which case hook 8 or 108 of that member is fastened to a pin fixed to support 2 or 102.
In addition, tab 7 or 107 can form the spring portion of member 3 or 103 or, at least, be part of it and be capable of being elastically bent.
Equally, members 3 need not be made of metal wire. For example, they can be made of an injection-molded polymer, in which case they can be integral with part of the acoustic panel.
In addition, acoustic panel 1 or 101 may only comprise a single layer 12 or 13 or 112 or 113. It may also comprise more than three layers.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
07 05648 | Aug 2007 | FR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/FR2008/051271 | 7/7/2008 | WO | 00 | 2/1/2010 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2009/019363 | 2/12/2009 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2177393 | Parkinson | Oct 1939 | A |
3350831 | Miller | Nov 1967 | A |
3816225 | Eckel | Jun 1974 | A |
5540027 | Christensen et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5907932 | LeConte et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
6267347 | Ryan et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
7093814 | Meisel et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7895803 | Downey et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
20020157329 | Berdan, II | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20060179762 | Thome et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20080092458 | Payne | Apr 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
199 01 607 | Feb 2000 | DE |
2 836 497 | Aug 2003 | FR |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110226546 A1 | Sep 2011 | US |