This application is the US national phase of PCT application EP2005/007999, filed 22 Jul. 2005, published 6 Apr. 2006 as WO2006/034744, and claiming the priority of German patent application 102004046926.1 itself filed 28 Sep. 2004, whose entire disclosures are herewith incorporated by reference.
The invention relates to a voltage regulator for power-supply lines.
In today's extensive centralized energy supply system, voltage control generally is effected by means of control transformers in the central nodes of the high or medium high voltage systems. For this purpose, the windings of the control transformers are provided with taps and it is possible to switch between adjacent winding taps without interruption under load by means of tap changers.
Generally, there exist two types of suitable tap changers: high-speed circuit breakers in which transition resistors are present and which can only be loaded during short periods of time for limiting the circuit current flowing during the switching operation and accordingly, effect a rapid switching between the winding taps, as well as those of the reactor switch type in which inductive transition impedances are used giving as a result a slow and continuous switching.
In the above-described voltage control in the field of high and medium-high voltage systems, it is however not possible to easily provide local control in distribution transformers in decentralized power-supply systems.
For this control that is effected close to the consumer in decentralized power supply systems, in particular in the USA, so-called “Voltage Regulators” have become widely accepted. Most common “Voltage Regulators” are single-phase, possess inductive transition impedances that are also referred to as reactor or reactor windings and enable 32-step voltage control, each step at ⅝%, i.e. in the range of +/−10%.
A different type of “Voltage regulator” is that of the Auto Boosters® type. This device has a less complicated structure and enables forward control in four steps of respectively 2½ or 1½%, i.e. +10 or +6% in total.
A further approach for providing voltage control that is close to the consumer in the field of low voltages is described in WO 2001/033308 [US equivalents U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,762,594 and 6,924,63] and WO 2003/044611 [US equivalent 20050017696]. Both applications in general are based on the object of providing a control transformer having a small number taps. Here, the individual partial windings are optionally looped by means of a changeover switch, the control transformer having a leakage impedance that is sufficient for limiting the circuit current to the order of the nominal current in the case of a short circuit of adjacent taps of the partial windings, which can occur during short periods of time when switching under load. The typical transition resistances of traditional tap changers can thus be avoided. In this arrangement, which is suitable for use as a control transformer of the autotransformer type or of a split-winding transformer type, different designs of the changeover switch are possible. Thus, it is proposed to use as changeover switch a load changeover switch of a tap changer that has no resistance contacts but only main contacts. According to other proposals, the changeover switch is designed as multiple cam stepping switch, optionally also composed of a series of relays or contactors, or finally, also consisting of a series of electronic switches, in particular thyristors. The number of possible positions thus corresponds to the number of required circuit elements of the changeover switch.
The disadvantage of this state of the art is that in particular in the case of the split-winding transformer, a separate primary and control winding must be provided. For raising the leakage inductance of each level such that the short-circuit current of the respective level only reaches the order of the nominal voltage, a short leakage channel is required. As a result a separate, short control winding is used and consequently leads to increased width and depth of the transformer. This additional expense of transformer costs is higher in many cases than gain obtained due to thus avoided transition resistances. Furthermore, the control performance is difficult; the known arrangement in particular is not suitable for parallel connections.
An object of the invention is to provide an easy and cost-efficient apparatus for regulating the electrical voltage for distribution transformers and voltage regulators that have the lowest possible number of switches.
This object is attained by an apparatus according to the invention preferably used for the regulation of distribution transformers and having a small range of regulation of for example +/−5% in steps of 2.5%, that is, in total for example five steps. The apparatus according to the invention is suitable for oil-filled transformers as well as for air-cooled transformers. The particular advantage is that only a minimum increase of the dimensions of the respective distribution transformer is required and a high usability and operational reliability are ensured. This is due to the fact that the apparatus according to the invention is designed as a switching apparatus that does not require the mechanically moved selectors or load selectors of a tap changer. The apparatus according to the invention furthermore is of low complexity; in particular it has only a few components as well as switches. For example only four switches are required for a design having five regulating voltage levels that can be selected that will be explained in further detail below. These switches can be designed particularly advantageous as an antiparallel thyristor pair or also as a vacuum switching cell.
The invention in the following is to be explained in further detail by means of drawings. In the drawings:
In
Each of the taps A1 . . . A3 is connected to the input of a circuit element, here a vacuum switch V1 . . . V3. The output of the first vacuum switch V1 that is connected to the tap A1 on the first winding end of the control winding 3, and the output of the second vacuum switch V2 that is connected to the tap A2 in the center of the control winding 3 are directed to both ends of a reactor winding 4; a further circuit element is connected in parallel thereto between the two outputs, here a further vacuum switch V4. The output of the third vacuum switch V3 that is connected to the tap A3 on the other end of the control winding 3 is electrically connected to the output of the first vacuum switch V1. The center of the reactor winding 4 is wired to the output line. For this purpose, a tap 5 is provided on the reactor winding 4.
By operation of the vacuum switches V1 . . . V4, the voltage in this example can be regulated in the range +/−5% in steps of 2.5%.
It can be seen that these four vacuum switches provide in total five voltage levels. This is due to the fact that on the taps A1 and A3, a voltage is available that differs by +/−5% from the voltage at the tap A2 and that by switching of the reactor winding 4, half of this amount, that is 2.5%, can be superposed.
Control of the vacuum switches V1 . . . V4 is easily possible for example by means of cams, since regardless of the switching direction, toward “higher voltage” or “lower voltage”, a very simple operation sequence results from easy up or down switching.
The described circuit elements can within the scope of the invention as described above be vacuum switches as well as mechanical switches or thyristors. The herein discussed design using thyristors has the advantage that the arrangement according to the invention in total results in a fully static switch, without any moving parts. For driving the thyristor Th1 . . . Th4, the table shown in
Within the scope of the invention, it is also possible to extend the circuit arrangement represented in
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2004 046 926 | Sep 2004 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2005/007999 | 7/22/2005 | WO | 00 | 3/28/2007 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2006/034744 | 4/6/2006 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3195038 | Fry | Jul 1965 | A |
3621374 | Kettler | Nov 1971 | A |
3732486 | Schoendube | May 1973 | A |
6137277 | Rajda et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6384588 | Mulhauser | May 2002 | B1 |
6472851 | Hammond | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6740826 | Friedrich et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6762594 | Hauer | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6924631 | Hauer | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7250743 | McVicar | Jul 2007 | B2 |
20050017696 | Hauer | Jan 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090140705 A1 | Jun 2009 | US |