The subject of the invention is a device for sampling dust or solid particles, which was designed for the purpose of detecting explosives, without excluding other applications, as the particles sampled can be of any nature compatible with the materials that constitute the device.
A conventional method for detecting the presence of certain substances, including explosives, consists in making use of specially-trained dogs. But despite the remarkable finesse of their sense of smell, the use of animals has the disadvantage of a low work capacity and a training period that is long and expensive. That is why other methods of detection have been developed. Certain are based on taking samples from the environment which are then analysed. The detection often concerns the vapour phase of the product that is sought to be recognised, with the sampling accomplished via suction devices; as the suction is in general at a low flow, these devices can more difficultly detect solid particles when their content in the atmosphere is low, all the more so that most of them can adhere to surrounding surfaces instead of being in suspension. But detecting vapours is not always possible: certain bodies, of which many explosives have a saturation vapour pressure that is very low, and therefore remain almost exclusively in solid state.
That is why it remains advantageous to sample, for the purposes of detecting them, samples of explosive materials in solid, dust or particle form. Common methods that do not make use of suction consist in performing a smear of the surface to be analysed in order to pull off particles and carry them off; but their use is prohibited in the frequent situations where one abstains from touching objects to be analysed in order to preserve them. Other methods make use of various forms of radiation in order to collect visual, spectroscopic or analytical information on explosives, but the latter have to be in substantial quantities and in massive form.
The device of the invention is based on the use of suction in order to sample solid particles. It can be distinguished from devices that accomplish the same function primarily under two aspects: it does not include any electrical actuation in order to make it possible to work even in hazardous atmospheres or in extreme temperatures (for example −40° to +60° C.), and it is designed in such a way as to suck a large flow even in the absence of an electric pump, in such a way as to allow for the sampling of particles in a substantial surrounding volume, which makes it possible to detect even very low content of them, while still creating a suction force that is sufficient to suck particles which may have become slightly stuck on surfaces in front of the device.
In a general form, the sampling device in accordance with the invention comprises a handle (1) for grasping established on a cyclone (2) for retaining sampled particles, a compressed air duct (7) responsible for the suction, and a mechanical valve (5) for closing the compressed air duct (7), controlled by an actuator (6), characterised in that it comprises an air amplifier (18), connected to the cyclone (2), via a passage (3), the compressed air duct (7) opens into the air amplifier (8) by being directed to the passage (3), and the air amplifier (8) comprises a circular slot (10) wherein the compressed air duct (7) opens, and a tapered groove (12) with a top directed towards the passage (3), extending the circular slot (9) and opening into a bore (13) of the amplifier (8), as such creating the amplification of the suction, and the amplifier is located between the cyclone and a nozzle (4) through which the particles enter into the device. The actuator can be a button, a trigger or a valve for example. As the valve is mechanical, it is entirely manual. The compressed air expanding in the nozzle produces a substantial driving of a flow of the outside air which can be from 100% to 1000% in comparable volumes of the compressed air in certain circumstances. This is what is called here the amplification of the suction and clearly distinguishes the invention from other devices wherein a more conventional but less effective suction is carried out. In comparison, U.S. Pat. No. 3,843,198 describes a device wherein a flow of compressed air contributes to sampling a sample of atmosphere, able to contain dust or particles, in front of a cutting tool, via a suction consecutive to a vacuum of the flow when it passes through a tightening: a suction duct extends from the location of sampling to the tightening by passing through a cyclone wherein the dust or particles are deposited. This suction via simple vacuum is however incapable of producing an amplification of the suction, i.e. a multiplication of the volume sampled in relation to volume of compressed air delivered, and even less so that the pressure losses through the suction duct, rather long and occupied by the cyclone, are substantial.
WO-A-00/16064 describes a device wherein the suction is consecutive to a blowing on an exterior circle, which makes it possible to detach the particles that are stuck on the sampling surface thanks to the pressure of the compressed air, but no amplification of the flow of compressed air is done to suck the sample since it is the compressed air itself which is sucked into the device.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,909,090 and WO-A-2009/139744 describe devices wherein the suction is carried out by a fan, i.e. an electrical device, contrary to what is desired here.
In the invention, the passage can in particular contain a filtering sieve with a large mesh in order to stop the large pieces sucked in. The particles sampled and recovered in the cyclone are then sent for analysis.
The valve and its actuator (trigger, etc.) are installed in the vicinity of the handle, and the compressed air duct can be oriented. This arrangement makes it possible to easily displace the nozzle in front of the locations where it is desired to take a sample without displacing the source of compressed air, which is generally a bottle left some distance away or carried by the operator in a knapsack or installed inside the hollow handle for small reservoirs if low autonomies are sufficient.
The invention shall now be described in more detail in liaison with the following figures:
and
The embodiment described in
Most of the parts of the device can be made of metal and are as such suitable for hot cleanings between two samplings; but certain parts can also be made from synthetic material (plastic) if it is acceptable to discard them and to replace them after a sampling.
An embodiment of the invention is described using
The tests have shown the effectiveness of the invention on the exterior of packaging containing explosives (Tolite or Hexomax). The sampling durations were less than one minute and the compressed air dispensed was a few hundred liters. The dust sampled shows the expected peaks in the chromatographic analyses.
Note that the hose of the passage (3) can be dismounted and replaced in order to change the direction of suction and as such improve accessibility to the particles.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2011/067330 | 10/4/2011 | WO | 00 | 4/1/2014 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2013/050066 | 4/11/2013 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3748905 | Fletcher | Jul 1973 | A |
3843198 | Reynolds | Oct 1974 | A |
3970428 | Barringer | Jul 1976 | A |
4754655 | Parker, III | Jul 1988 | A |
4909090 | McGown | Mar 1990 | A |
5663561 | Franzen | Sep 1997 | A |
5751897 | Van Alstyne | May 1998 | A |
5970803 | Staples | Oct 1999 | A |
6354160 | Staples | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6378385 | Bowers | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6828795 | Krasnobaev | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6861646 | Motchkine | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6895804 | Lovell | May 2005 | B2 |
6978657 | Baumann | Dec 2005 | B1 |
7098672 | Belyakov | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7833802 | Henry | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7997119 | Wu | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8113069 | Settles | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8307723 | Novosselov | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8353223 | Bunker | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8377711 | Henry | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8561486 | Novosselov | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8646340 | Zhang | Feb 2014 | B2 |
20060115559 | Jones, Jr. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060249671 | Karpetsky | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070068284 | Castro | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070158447 | Bunker | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080190218 | Riazanskaia | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20090084201 | Almirall | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20140130615 | Karki | May 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102004002842 | Aug 2005 | DE |
0896213 | Feb 1999 | EP |
2965054 | Mar 2012 | FR |
0016064 | Mar 2000 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report for PCT/EP2011/067330 dated Jun. 28, 2012. |
Written Opinion for PCT/EP2011/067330. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140245843 A1 | Sep 2014 | US |