The present invention relates to the domain of mail handling and more particularly to a device for selecting mail items, employed in an automatic feed module in a franking machine.
Conventionally, a franking machine must be adapted to receive different types of mail items such as more or less thick documents, letters or envelopes. To that end, it often comprises, upstream, an automatic feed module, also called feeder, allowing in particular the conveying of these mail items at different speeds and usually comprising means for receiving/stacking, selecting, conveying and possibly closing these mail items.
U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,909,499, 4,978,114 and 5,431,385 show such automatic feeders comprising a selection module adapted for the passage of mail items of different thicknesses. The selection modules of these feeders maintain the pressure on the mail items while ensuring the selection of one of them. In effect, these two functions of pressure and of selection are performed by a single system of belts inclined downstream in the direction of advance of the mail items.
Now, such systems present major drawbacks. In effect, the simultaneous management of the pressure to be exerted on the stack of mail items and of the selection of one of them does not optimalize the force of drive of these mail items through the feeder and the selection therefore strongly depends on the pressure exerted by the stack of mail items.
It is an object of the present invention to overcome the afore-mentioned drawbacks by proposing a selection device, integrated in a mail item feed module intended to be placed upstream of a franking machine, and comprising selection means which are independent of the action exerted by the stack of mail items, whether it be small or great due to the handling of a variable number of heavy envelopes, for example.
These objects are attained by a selection device for separating one by one, or singulating, the items of a stack of mail items, comprising a support surface and conveying means for driving these mail items over the support surface, characterized in that it further comprises a mobile presser plate cooperating with the conveying means in order to drive downstream a part of the mail items issuing from the stack of mail items to be separated and corresponding to a predetermined maximum thickness of mail items and independent, individually mobile selection means for selecting a mail item from the mail items driven by the conveying means.
By this specific structure which dissociates the function of feed of mail items from the function of selection proper, it is possible to ensure an automatic, particularly high-performance feed of the franking machine located downstream of the feed module. In effect, with this configuration, the weight of the stack of mail items can no longer perform a determining role on the behaviour of these items during their selection and the dimensioning of the spring of the presser plate may in that case be optimalized.
The presser plate may pivot about a hinge pin of an articulated mechanism which may itself pivot about a pivot pin so as to remain constantly parallel to said support surface whatever the number of mail items conveyed. The pivoting of said presser plate about said hinge pin is exerted against a first elastic means, of which one end is fixed to said presser plate and the other end is fixed to said articulated mechanism. The pivoting of said articulated mechanism about said pivot pin is exerted against a second elastic means, of which one end is fixed to said articulated mechanism and the other end is fixed to a fixed part of the frame of the device.
Said presser plate preferably comprises a stop for limiting its pivoting with the articulated mechanism.
The conveying means advantageously comprise parallel drive belts controlled by a common motor means and extending through said support surface.
The selection means comprise tongues interposed between the drive belts and acting against elastic means of which one end is fixed on said tongue and the other end is fixed to the fixed part or frame of the device. An additional selection tongue is advantageously arranged outside the drive belts to allow a separation of mail items of large format.
According to the invention, the selection device further comprises, downstream of said selection means, articulated return means for driving upstream all the mail items except one issuing from said selection means.
The invention will be more readily understood on reading the following description given by way of non-limiting example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Referring now to the drawings, an automatic mail item feed module conventionally comprises a feed zone formed essentially by a deck intended to receive a stack of mail items and comprising first conveying rollers for driving these mail items downstream (and against an aligning wall) to the level of a zone of separation comprising a selection device in which these items are extracted from the stack one by one. Second conveying rollers are generally provided at the outlet of this separation zone in order to convey the mail items thus extracted towards a module for moistening and closing these mail items (when it is present). Such an automatic feeder further comprises different known control and monitoring means necessary for its functioning (particularly for actuating the different rollers driving the mail items) which will not be described in greater detail.
As shown in
The three parallel drive belts 14, 16, 18 of the conveying means are controlled by a common motor means 42 through a gear assembly and extend through the support surface 12. The selection tongues of which two are interposed between the three drive belts, act against elastic means 44, 46 of which one end 44A, 46A is fixed on the tongue and the other end 44B, 46B is fixed to the fixed part, or frame 36, of the device. It will be noted that the selection means may also comprise a third selection tongue disposed outside the drive belts in order to facilitate separation of the mail items of large format, for example of format A4. This tongue, like the preceding ones, is mobile individually against an elastic means of which one end is fixed on the tongue and the other end is fixed to the frame.
It will be noted that the number of selection tongues and of drive belts (which might advantageously be replaced by conveyor rollers) may be variable. It depends in particular on the format of the mail items handled by the feeder. For example, for a feeder handling only envelopes of standard European format, it may be envisaged to use only two drive belts and one selection tongue interposed between these two belts, contrary to the example illustrated where three drive belts and two interposed selection tongues are provided.
The selection device further comprises downstream of the selection means, return means for driving upstream all the mail items except one issuing from the selection means. In effect, it may happen, albeit exceptionally, that the selection tongues select two and not one mail item. In that case, these return means preferably formed by as many conveying rollers 50, 52 as there exist selection tongues, make it possible to drive in the opposite direction the second mail item located uppermost and to allow to pass only the first lying lowermost and directly in contact with the drive belts 14, 16, 18. The conveyor rollers are mounted on a common shaft 56 driven in rotation, through a return belt 60 and drive gears, by a motorization shaft 62, itself driven in rotation by motor means 58. In addition, this motorization shaft constitutes a pivot pin about which the conveyor rollers are articulated in order to allow the insertion and drive of a mail item of considerable thickness (16 mm maximum for an initial separation plate of 20 mm).
The separation device functions as follows: The mail items stacked on the receiving plate of the feed zone are driven by the conveying rollers from this zone towards the selection device which will extract them one by one to direct them towards a following module of the feeder then towards the franking machine proper. At the level of the selection device, the stack of mail items on the receiving plate, to be handled, is firstly limited in height by the separation plate 10 then the mail items introduced are pressed against the drive belts 14, 16, 18 by the presser plate 20 which will pass from an inclined position to a horizontal position under the action of the articulated mechanism 22. Under the effect of the drive, the selected mail items are directed downstream towards the selection tongues against which they abut except for one of them which will be selected by this tongue, i.e. which will pass therebeneath, to be driven further downstream (cf.
It will be noted that the individual mobility of the tongues makes it possible to take into account the differences in thickness that may exist in the same mail item, due in particular to the types of documents contained in these items. In addition, the independence of the tongues with respect to the presser plate allows a better apprehension of the drive efforts exerted by each of these elements.
With the architecture of the present invention, the role of the weight of the stack of mail items on the function of selection of these items and therefore also on the outlet of the feeder is reduced. Moreover, in the case of passage of one sole item, the presser plate takes up the loss of effort in the receiving plate and allows a better drive of this item.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
01 16814 | Dec 2001 | FR | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1046190 | Huddleston | Dec 1912 | A |
1588843 | Labombarde | Jun 1926 | A |
1948362 | Staude | Feb 1934 | A |
2448303 | Fors | Aug 1948 | A |
3111885 | Perrelli | Nov 1963 | A |
3126201 | Rehm | Mar 1964 | A |
3151863 | Lohr | Oct 1964 | A |
3895791 | Kramell et al. | Jul 1975 | A |
4083555 | Irvine et al. | Apr 1978 | A |
4568074 | Murayoshi | Feb 1986 | A |
4909499 | O'Brien et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4978114 | Holbrook | Dec 1990 | A |
5004218 | Sardano et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5011124 | Sardano et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5083766 | Osawa | Jan 1992 | A |
5201508 | Kuo | Apr 1993 | A |
5431385 | Holbrook | Jul 1995 | A |
6003857 | Salomon et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6135441 | Belec et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6585251 | Allen et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 543 559 | May 1993 | EP |
0 714 841 | Jun 1996 | EP |
2 329 563 | May 1977 | FR |
WO 9628373 | Sep 1996 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030141650 A1 | Jul 2003 | US |