The present invention relates to a device for switching on and off an engine of a motor vehicle having a sensor for locating a preceding vehicle and a control unit for switching on and off the engine as a function of the state of motion of the preceding vehicle.
A device is described in German Patent No. DE 101 39 595 in which the state of motion of the preceding vehicle, that is, the vehicle that is located immediately in front of the host vehicle, is detected with the aid of a radar sensor. If both the preceding vehicle and the host vehicle are stationary and the host vehicle remains stationary longer than a predefined time span, the engine is automatically switched off. If it is then established with the aid of the radar sensor that the preceding vehicle has been set in motion again, the engine is automatically restarted. This device thus makes it possible to save a considerable amount of fuel at a high level of comfort to the driver in stop and go situations in a traffic jam, for example. In this instance, the decision regarding the switching on and off of the engine does not need to be exclusively a function of the state of motion of the preceding vehicle, but may additionally be a function of other parameters, for example, the state of motion of other motor vehicles that are located in adjacent lanes (vehicles driving away in the adjacent lane generally indicate that a traffic jam is clearing up) or also the state of a traffic signal (traffic light) that is detected with the aid of a video system.
The engine of the motor vehicle is usually an internal combustion engine for which the starting operation requires a certain amount of time. Since with the aid of the known device the starting operation is initiated only when a movement of the preceding vehicle is detected, undesired delays may occur when a traffic jam is clearing up. On the other hand, there may also be situations in which, from the standpoint of saving fuel, it is unfavorable to automatically switch off the engine. For example, this is the case if the engine must already be restarted after a standstill of less than approximately three seconds. This case also results in an undesired load on the engine starter and the vehicle battery.
An objective of the present invention is to further develop a device of the type mentioned above such that the switching on and off of the engine may occur in a way better suited to the situation.
According to the present invention, this objective is achieved by setting up the control unit to control the switching on and off of the engine as a function of the state of motion of at least one additional vehicle in the same lane.
For example, the additional vehicle may be a vehicle present immediately in front of the vehicle. If the state of motion of this vehicle in front of the preceding vehicle is taken into account, the engine is able to be started in a traffic jam situation as soon as the vehicle in front of the preceding vehicle is set in motion again. This makes it possible to avoid the undesired delay, and the host vehicle is able to drive off practically simultaneously with the immediately preceding vehicle.
A radar sensor is particularly suitable for detecting the state of motion of the vehicle in front of the preceding vehicle and, possibly, vehicles located still farther in front, since radar sensors, as they are frequently used in motor vehicles for automatic vehicle-to-vehicle ranging, are able to “tunnel under” the preceding vehicle and thus to locate the vehicle in front of the preceding vehicle even if it is hidden from the driver himself by the preceding vehicle.
However, the at least one additional vehicle whose state of motion is taken into account may also be the host vehicle, that is, the vehicle that is equipped with the device according to the present invention. To achieve the greatest possible fuel savings, it is to with useful under certain conditions, for example, when approaching an end of a traffic jam, to switch off the engine even before the host vehicle has come to a standstill. However, since modern motor vehicles are usually equipped with a brake booster whose effectiveness only continues for a limited time Tb after switching off the engine, the engine should be switched off only when it is so late that the vehicle will come to a standstill before the limited time has elapsed. The appropriate time for switching off the engine is then a function of the distance between the host vehicle and the vehicle preceding it and of the present speed of the host vehicle, that is, a function of the state of motion of the host vehicle and not only, as in the related art, of the duration of the standstill of the host vehicle.
Preferably, the control unit of the device according to the present invention takes into account both the states of motion of additional vehicles present in front of the preceding vehicle and the state of motion of the host vehicle, as well.
If, with regard to the state of motion of the host vehicle, the prerequisites for switching off the engine are fulfilled, but at that moment the vehicle in front of the preceding vehicle has already been set in motion again, it is advisable to prevent the switching-off operation to avoid a merely brief engine standstill.
The device shown in
The corresponding time characteristic of a switch-off signal 20 is shown in diagram form in
If a is the length of preceding vehicle 16 (in practice, a fixed value corresponding to the typical length of a passenger vehicle may be assumed for a), b the present distance between vehicle 14 and stopping point S, c the present distance between vehicle 14 and vehicle 18 in front of the preceding vehicle, and d the usual stopping distance between vehicles in a stationary column (typically 3 m), then the following relationship is valid:
b=c−a−2d.
If v is the present speed of vehicle 14 and one assumes a constant braking deceleration until the standstill of vehicle 14, then the following is valid for the remaining stopping time Ta of vehicle 14:
Ta=2*b/v.
The condition required so that the brake booster may still be effective during the entire stopping time Ta reads:
Ta<Tb
or equivalent:
Ta+Td≦Tb,
with a suitable safety time supplement Td.
In the formulas specified above, the variables b, c, and v, and consequently also Ta, are time-dependent functions. Control unit 12 may now determine switch-off time Ts in that control unit 12 calculates stopping time Ta cyclically with the aid of the current values for b, c, and v, and checks to see whether the condition Ta+Td≦Tb is fulfilled, for example. In the event of large distances c, this will not yet be the case. If the above-mentioned condition is fulfilled for the first time, control unit 12 outputs a signal for switching off the engine.
In an analogous way, control unit 12 is able to control the switching off of the engine if vehicle 18 in front of the preceding vehicle is not present, but preceding vehicle 16 is stationary. In this case, stopping time Ta is to be calculated as a function of the distance between vehicle 14 and stationary preceding vehicle 16 and stopping distance d.
In this way, it is ensured that in traffic situations in which a switching off of the engine is appropriate, this switching off occurs in each instance at the earliest possible point in time.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2006 009 654 | Mar 2006 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2007/050710 | 1/25/2007 | WO | 00 | 2/3/2009 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2007/098999 | 9/7/2007 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3710383 | Cherry et al. | Jan 1973 | A |
3778826 | Flannery et al. | Dec 1973 | A |
4079802 | Kawata | Mar 1978 | A |
6044321 | Nakamura et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6278360 | Yanagi | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6283086 | Yamamoto et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6332108 | Hirasago | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6420996 | Stopczynski et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6597981 | Nishira et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6629515 | Yamamoto et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
7225073 | Hedman et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7319932 | Thorne | Jan 2008 | B2 |
20030029406 | Weiss | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20070112494 | Naik et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
100 41 789 | May 2001 | DE |
101 39 595 | Feb 2003 | DE |
102 34 064 | Feb 2004 | DE |
101 43 065 | Jul 2004 | DE |
1 283 357 | Feb 2003 | EP |
WO 02063163 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO 03001055 | Jan 2003 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090312933 A1 | Dec 2009 | US |