The invention relates to an apparatus for detecting whether a track section is occupied or free, having at least one vehicle-side transmitter and trackside receiver pairs, which are arranged at the ends of the track section and each have first and second receivers which are separated in the track direction, wherein the receivers receive signals from the transmitter when the vehicle passes, and are connected to an evaluation device.
The track-free signal represents a major decision criterion for the control of points and signals. The occupancy state of the track sections is used to decide whether a rail vehicle may or may not enter this track section. The basic aim is to prevent collisions between vehicles by driving into one another from opposite directions or from the side. For this purpose, it is necessary to ensure that only one vehicle is ever located on a defined section of the track. The entry of other vehicles to this track section which is occupied by a vehicle must be refused. This is the traditional task of a signal box. For this purpose, the signal box requires safety information as to which track sections are occupied and which are free.
In order to detect the presence of a vehicle, in particular a vehicle with rubber tires, on a track section, the unpublished 2008P04438DE proposes that transmitting means be arranged on the vehicle side and that receiving means be arranged on the track side, at the start and at the end of the track section, with the receiving means receiving signals from the transmitting means when the vehicle passes, and supplying them to an evaluation device. This allows a track-free signaling system to be designed which, in contrast to axle counters or track circuits, is not based on the presence of metallic vehicle wheels or axles. However, this track-free signaling system is subject to the problem of guaranteeing that the defined transmission and reception range, that is to say the coupling range between the transmitter and receiver, does not change without being noticed. One critical factor in particular here is to increase the coupling range. It is therefore not possible to prevent a vehicle signaling that it is departing from a track section even though it is well away from the assumed position at the end of the track section and, in consequence, this track section is still occupied. A dangerous increase in the coupling range can be caused both by the transmission level of the transmitter drifting away and by the sensitivity of the receivers drifting away from the defined limits.
The invention is based on the object of overcoming these disadvantages and of specifying a track-free signaling device of this generic type in which an increase in the coupling range can be detected in real time, thus making it possible to prevent premature signaling that a track section which is still occupied is free.
According to the invention, the object is achieved in that a response of the receivers during the passage with a coupling range between the transmitter and the receiver plus a maximum travel distance, which results from a minimum pulse duration of the receivers and a track maximum speed, is preset such that, if the coupling range increases as a result of a fault, this results in an intersection of the response of the receivers in the receiver pair. This ensures that the track-free signaling device is checked for a critical increase in the coupling range whenever a vehicle passes by. There is no additional effort for regularly measuring the instantaneous coupling range in situ. There is no need for servicing measures of this type, and when particular advantage of the claimed solution is that faults can be detected in real time.
In the end, this therefore allows a higher safety level to be achieved than when the coupling range is checked at long time intervals. A further advantage is that the interaction of both vehicle components and track components is effectively checked. The system tolerance corresponds only to the travel distance which is preset as the minimum pulse duration in conjunction with the response of the receivers. The pulse duration and the travel distance which results from this at the maximum track speed should be chosen to be as small as possible since intersection of the ready-to-receive states of the adjacent receivers can be detected even when there is minor increase in the coupling range. In the final analysis, the track can therefore be better optimized for vehicles passing through. Even at the start of an intersection of the response of the receivers, that is to say when transmitted signals are received at the same time by both receivers in the receiver pair, countermeasures can be provided to return the coupling range to the intended order of magnitude. In this case, it is easily possible to decide whether the coupling range has resulted from an increased transmission level of the vehicle-side transmitter or from an increase in the sensitivity of a trackside receiver, by evaluating a plurality of passages of different vehicles.
One claimed embodiment provides not only for the receivers to be arranged in pairs, but also the transmitters. This redundant configuration of the transmitters and receivers provides adequate safety for the production of the track-free signals to be evaluated even when the transmitters and/or the receivers are not designed to be safe for signaling purposes.
In order to comply with the stringent requirements for system safety, the receivers as claimed in one embodiment are connected to an evaluation device, which is safe from the signaling point of view in a signal box, wherein the responses of the two receivers in a receiver pair are AND-linked. The signal box preferably receives redundant information, which complies with the required very stringent safety level for the track-free signal by means of the evaluation within the signal box, which is normally safe for signaling purposes. The AND-linking makes it possible to determine in a simple manner whether both receivers are producing output information at the same time.
The invention will be explained in more detail in the following text with reference to illustrations in the figures, in which:
As can be seen from
The response of the receiver E1, that is to say the time during which the output signal is emitted, corresponds to the duration of the coupling plus a time t0, wherein a maximum travel distance D0 can be traveled through during this time t0, for which D0=t0•vmax, where vmax is the maximum permissible speed for this track section. This relationship is illustrated in
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2008 025 188 | May 2008 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2009/055750 | 5/13/2009 | WO | 00 | 11/23/2010 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2009/141251 | 11/26/2009 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3829682 | Geiger | Aug 1974 | A |
3868075 | Blazek et al. | Feb 1975 | A |
3888437 | Birkin | Jun 1975 | A |
4325524 | Krug | Apr 1982 | A |
4498650 | Smith et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
5330135 | Roberts | Jul 1994 | A |
5483816 | Nayer et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5803411 | Ackerman et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
7099754 | Sugita et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7269487 | Watanabe et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7975968 | Bohlmann et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3134766 | Mar 1983 | DE |
102008016962 | Oct 2009 | DE |
0657337 | Jun 1995 | EP |
1561663 | Aug 2005 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110127388 A1 | Jun 2011 | US |