The invention relates to a device for dynamically weighing postal items, the device comprising a plate floatingly mounted on a weight sensor, and a conveyor belt mounted on the plate to move postal items in a longitudinal conveyor direction, the conveyor comprising two parallel conveyor belts extending along the conveyor direction between a conveyor inlet and a conveyor outlet, with the postal items being pinched therebetween and being moved in series standing on their edges.
Such a device is known from document EP-0 881 956. It is intended more particularly for fitting to a postal sorting machine in which postal items are moved in series standing on edge at a speed of about 3.15 meters per second (m/s) and at a rate of throughput lying in the range three to six postal items per second. That type of device can be used as additional means for defining, verifying, and checking the postage that has been applied to the postal items. The weight measured for each postal item can also be used as a sorting criterion in the sorting machine.
In the prior art device for dynamic weighing, the two conveyor belts are engaged on rigid rotary wheels disposed at the inlet and at the outlet of the conveyor path and they are offset from each other in the conveyor direction so that each postal item penetrates between the two conveyor belts obliquely relative to the conveyor direction on the plate. As a result each postal item is subjected to deformation on entering into the conveyor and on leaving the conveyor. That prior art arrangement is not reliable for weighing postal items of thickness that can vary over a wide range. At least for postal items that are thick and/or rigid, the folding deformation on entering the conveyor leads to mechanical impacts and vibration which disturb measurement accuracy. That system cannot process postal items that are very rigid.
The object of the invention is to provide a device for dynamically weighing postal items that can weigh reliably and with great accuracy a broad spectrum of postal items of thickness that may lie in the range 0.32 millimeters (mm) to 32 mm, and of weight that may lie in the range less than 20 grams (g) to 2000 g.
To this end, the invention provides a device for dynamically weighing postal items, the device comprising a plate floatingly mounted on a weight sensor, and a conveyor belt mounted on the plate to move postal items in a longitudinal conveyor direction, the conveyor comprising two parallel conveyor belts extending along the conveyor direction between a conveyor inlet and a conveyor outlet, with the postal items being pinched therebetween and being moved in series standing on their edges, the device being characterized in that the two conveyors belts are engaged on a pair of first elastically deformable finned wheels disposed at the inlet of the conveyor and aligned perpendicularly to the longitudinal direction, and on a pair of second elastically deformable finned wheels disposed at the outlet of the conveyor and aligned perpendicularly to the longitudinal direction, and in that the operation of the weight sensor is based on the electromagnetic principle of flux compensation.
With this arrangement, postal items are displaced between the inlet and the outlet of the conveyor in a direction that is substantially rectilinear, and as a result they are not subjected to deformation along the conveyor path. Mechanical vibration in the device of the invention is reduced by mounting the finned wheels on shafts secured to the plates and by using a weight sensor operating on the electromagnetic principle of flux compensation. With this device, postal items penetrating into the conveyor by passing between the two first finned wheels and the impacts caused by postal items fixed between these two finned wheels are absorbed by the elastic deformation of the finned wheels. The same applies at the outlet from the conveyor. With this arrangement, the number of moving parts in a dynamic weighing device is reduced, thereby making it easier to obtain great accuracy in measurement over a broad spectrum of postal items. In addition, reducing the number of parts helps to reduce the tare weight of the weighing device.
The dynamic weighing device of the invention presents the following features:
The invention also provides a postal sorting machine including a dynamic weighing device as defined above.
An embodiment of a device for dynamically weighing postal items in accordance with the invention is described below and is shown in the drawings.
The operation of the weight sensor is based on the electromagnetic principle of flux compensation. The principle of measurement by flux compensation, also known as magnetic force restoration (MFR) is shown in
The belt conveyor of the invention comprise a pair of first finned wheels 2A, 3A having respective rims that are radially deformable in elastic manner. These finned wheels 2A, 3A are disposed at the inlet E of the conveyor in perpendicular alignment to the longitudinal direction D in which postal items are conveyed on the plate 1. The belt conveyor also has a pair of second finned wheels 2B, 3B with respective rims that are radially deformable in elastic manner disposed at the outlet S from the conveyor 1, being aligned perpendicularly to the direction D. As can be seen in
A first conveyor belt 2C is engaged on the finned wheels 2A, 2B, and a second conveyor belt 3C is engaged on the finned wheels 3A, 3B. The two conveyor belts 2C, 3C extend parallel to each other along the conveyor direction D and hold the postal items by clamping them so that they move standing on edge in series along the direction D. The conveyor belts are driven by means of a self-contained electric motor (not shown) fixed on the plate 1.
With this arrangement of a conveyor having finned wheels, each postal item such as P penetrates at the inlet of the conveyor by passing between the two finned wheels 2A, 2B, and leaves the conveyor by passing between the two finned wheels 3A, 3B. The postal item thus follows a substantially rectilinear path between the inlet and the outlet of the conveyor, said path extending along the direction D.
In order to reduce slackness on the postal items at the inlet and the outlet of the conveyor, it is preferable to use finned wheels of small diameter, for example finned wheels having a diameter of about 150 mm.
The length of the conveyor between the inlet E and the outlet S is about 500 mm to 900 mm. The bottoms of the postal items are guided on the plate 1 by a trough 4 extending along the direction D. The trough 4 is of width slightly greater than the maximum width of a postal item, which in the present case is 32 mm. The trough has a flared end at the inlet E to the conveyor. As can be seen in
A fifth finned wheel 5 having a rim that is elastically deformable in a radial direction is also disposed between the pair of finned wheels 2A, 3A and the pair of finned wheels 2B, 3B so as to pinch the two belts 2C, 3C against a side wall of the trough 4 which serves as a reference surface, thereby preventing the postal items from sliding while they are being conveyed along the direction D. The finned wheel 5 has an outside diameter that is greater than that of the finned wheels 2A to 3B, in this case about 250 mm, since it needs to be capable of being flattened by twice as much as the finned wheels 2A to 3B.
A passage-detection cell 7, e.g. using light emitting and receiving diodes, is disposed between the wheels 2A, 3A and the wheel 5 so as to detect the passage of postal items along the conveyor. The detection signals delivered by the cell 7 serve to control the weight sensor as described below. A backing pulley or a sixth finned wheel like the wheel 5 can be placed facing the wheel 4 in order to improve the operation of the weighing system.
The finned wheels 2A to 3B and 5 have axes of rotation that are stationary relative to the plate.
In
In
The flow chart of
The processor UC is in a waiting loop 10, 11 so long as the signal S1 does not indicate that a postal item is going past the cell 7.
When a transition is detected in the signal S1 at 11, then the processor UC occupies a waiting loop 12, 13 until a timeout t1 (T2−T1) has elapsed. At the end of the timeout t1, the processor UC enters a loop 14 in which it digitizes the signal S2 during a period t2 (equal to T3−T2) which is timed at 15. After that, the processor UC acts at 16 to calculate the weight of the postal item (e.g. by taking the average of instantaneous values for the signal S2 as measured between the instants T2 and T3) and processing restarts at 10 for a new postal item. In practice, given the travel speed of postal items of 3.15 m/s, and given the length of the plate which is about 750 mm, t1 is about 150 milliseconds (ms) while t2 is about 88 ms.
Tests have shown that with the weighing device of the invention, it is possible to perform weighing dynamically with precision of better than 10 grams and with an error rate of less than 1.1%. This can be performed on postal items traveling at an average speed of 3.15 m/s at a throughput rate of three to six items per second, with the items being of any thickness in the range 0.23 mm to 32 mm, and being of length lying in the range 140 mm to 400 mm, and of height lying in the range 90 mm to 300 mm, with a weight lying in the range 20 g to 2000 g.
Naturally, the device of the invention could be used for dynamically weighing postal items of small format, and also flat items of other types that are displaced at a constant speed while standing on edge.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
02 16551 | Dec 2002 | FR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/FR03/50131 | 11/25/2003 | WO | 00 | 1/14/2004 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2004/059263 | 7/15/2004 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
840446 | Ertheiler | Jan 1907 | A |
3951257 | Storace et al. | Apr 1976 | A |
4283031 | Finch | Aug 1981 | A |
4909499 | O'Brien et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
5238236 | Belec et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5326938 | Tolson | Jul 1994 | A |
5684275 | Tolson | Nov 1997 | A |
5701990 | Novak et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5726393 | Lyga | Mar 1998 | A |
6564928 | Darrou et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6595348 | Grasswill et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6759602 | Miller et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6949710 | Conard et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 881 956 | Dec 1998 | EP |
2 795 396 | Dec 2000 | FR |
0291258 | May 1988 | JP |
WO 0102278 | Jan 2001 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060070851 A1 | Apr 2006 | US |