The invention relates to a device for the treatment of packaging foils, comprising a first embossing unit having at least one embossing roll provided with embossing structures that are arranged in a basic grid for satinizing the packaging foil and/or with embossing structures which deviate from the basic grid for creating authentication features and/or logos on the packaging foil, the work cadence of the first embossing unit being synchronizable to the process cadence (P) of the packaging process, and a second embossing unit to which the packaging foil can be supplied at the work cadence (A1) of the first embossing unit after its passage therethrough, the second embossing unit comprising at least two folding rolls for applying folding breaks to the packaging foil.
WO 02-076716 A1 and EP 1 437 213 A1, which are hereby integrally incorporated into the present application by reference, disclose respective devices for satinizing and embossing metallized packaging foils that are used in particular as so-called “innerliner packages” in cigarette packets. The satinizing process produces two effects. On one hand, an optical refinement of the paper surface is achieved by the application of a fine, uniform embossing pattern, thereby producing a diffuse, mat optical finish on the metallized paper surface. On the other hand, a breakage of the paper fibers is achieved, which facilitates the subsequent processing steps, more particularly the folding operations.
For economical reasons and for reasons of environmental protection, it is also contemplated to use a packaging foil that may be varicolored but is not metallized. On this packaging foil, the optical refinement through satinizing is visible by a uniform roughness of the paper surface. The other effect, the breakage of the paper fibers, is the same as with metallized packaging foil. The packaging foils contemplated here are not only utilizable for packaging cigarettes but also for cigars as well as sweets or pharmaceutical products.
In the satinizing process, embossing rolls are used whose surface structure is composed of similar embossing structures that are arranged in a homogenous basic grid. Particular areas of the roll surface and/or individual embossing structures may differ from the basic grid in their arrangement and/or geometrical shape in order to specifically produce a deviating dispersion behavior of the incident light rays in that area of the embossed paper surface. This allows for a large number of optical effects. Thus, for example, it is possible by completely omitting embossing structures in particular areas of the roll surface to produce logos which distinguish themselves from the satinized area around them. Furthermore, by a modified geometrical shape of individual embossing structures on the embossing roll, authentication features can be embedded in the satinized paper surface.
One advantage of the satinizing and embossing device is that the mentioned diversity of surface structures can be produced on the packaging foil as it passes through a single arrangement of embossing rolls. In this manner, the work cadence of the embossing unit can be synchronized to the process cadence of the packaging installation in a relatively simple manner.
Another, already mentioned advantage with regard to the subsequent packaging process is that the satinizing process produces a breakage of the fibers of the packaging foil, thereby allowing, to a certain extent, a reproducible folding of the paper during the packaging of the cigarettes. This is necessary since even a slightly inaccurate folding angle rapidly increases the failure susceptibility of the packaging process already. By a cooperation of three embossing rolls in an embossing unit, the folding properties of the satinized paper are strongly improved.
Such a device is known from the already cited WO 02-076716 A1 to the applicant of the present invention where the packaging foil first passes through a first roll pair and then through a second roll pair, the application of three rolls resulting in a reduction of the contact pressure and in an improved breakage of the paper component of the packaging material.
However, with regard to the packaging process, an improved foldability of the packaging foil at high process speeds is desirable. Besides a precisely reproducible location of the folding edge, the term “foldability” also denotes the application of the smallest possible force for folding the paper as well as an improvement of the so-called dead-fold properties of the packaging foil, i.e. ascertaining that the natural memory effects will not disturb the packaging process by causing the folded portions to revert to their original state.
The required mechanical forces are difficult to control and necessarily also act upon the packaged goods, thereby possibly causing damages or their destruction. This is particularly the case in packaging processes where folding of the packaging foil in the longitudinal direction of the packaged cigarettes is required. Another problem with regard to the folding technique is the diversity of commonly used paper grades which, besides locally varying differences in quality, also exhibit different grammages between 19 gsm and approx. 115 gsm. Furthermore, calendered paper is increasingly being used whose stiffness is increased and that tends to keep its original shape. The differences in foldability of these paper grades must be controllable by the packaging machine in order to avoid losses in quality and waste.
A method and device for manufacturing a cigarette pack are known from DE 198 59 949 A1, which discloses an impressing member for producing impressed lines to prefold the so-called innerliner. To this end, the cutting apparatus comprising the impressing member is driven individually and directly synchronized to the process cadence of the packaging machine. Moreover, the cigarette groups are driven in a non-uniform manner.
A method and device for producing blanks for an innerliner of a cigarette group is known from DE 10 2005 056 627 A1, where the position of the printings is verified and the speed of the material web is varied to compensate for incorrect positioning.
Both of the cited methods and devices are intended for a particular packaging machine type and each have a single-stage synchronization, and on this background, it is the object of the invention to ensure a better foldability of the packaging foil during the subsequent packaging process for packaging foils according to the preamble that are satinized and provided with precisely embossed logos and/or authentication features while both the position of the folding edges is variable in a process-dependent manner and the precise position of the logos and/or authentication features is preserved, and the process cadence before and after the embossing units is the same.
This object is attained by a device for the treatment of packaging foils wherein a first regulating unit 17) of the first embossing unit that is synchronizable to the process cadence (P) of the packaging installation, and a second regulating unit of the second embossing unit, the second regulating unit serving for the synchronization of the work cadence (A2) of the second embossing unit to the work cadence (A1) of the first embossing unit.
Further preferred embodiments of the invention are defined by the dependent claims.
The invention is explained in more detail hereinafter with reference to drawings of exemplary embodiments.
A device 1 for the preparation of packaging foils to the subsequent packaging process comprises a first embossing unit 2 and a second embossing unit 10. First embossing unit 2 comprises three embossing rolls 3, 4, 5, embossing roll 3 being driven by a drive 6. The configuration and arrangement of embossing rolls 3, 4, and 5 are known per se and have been disclosed in different patent specifications and also in the references cited in the introduction. Driven embossing roll 3 has a surface structure comprising individual tooth-shaped embossing structures 7 that are arranged in a both axially and circularly homogenous grid pattern and by which the satinizing effect is achieved. This surface structure is called the basic grid. More specifically, embossing structures 7 may be pyramidal with different cross-sections, frustopyramidal, or conical in shape. In the case of pyramidal embossing structures 7, the latter have a cross-section in the shape of a tetragonal parallelogram.
Furthermore, on the surface of driven roll 3, there are particular areas 8 in which the embossing structures deviate from the basic grid. Thus, by completely omitting embossing structures in area 8, a logo is created. Also, the roll surface may be provided with individual embossing structures having different geometrical shapes and/or surfaces in order to produce marks on the packaging foil whose appearance varies according to the viewing angle of the observer and/or the kind and/or the position of the lighting source, according to the disclosure of EP-1 437 213 A1. The latter may e.g. serve as decorations or authentication features.
In the exemplary embodiment according to
A second embossing unit 10 is arranged after first embossing unit 2 at a distance that corresponds to a transport path W of packaging foil 16. Second embossing unit 10 serves for shaping folding breaks 27a-f on the surface of the packaging foil and comprises two folding rolls 11 and 12 whose action brings about a simplification of the subsequent folding process and which consequently act as prefolding rolls. Folding roll 11 is coupled to a drive 13 whereas folding roll 12 acts as the mating roll. Folding rolls 11 and 12 have essentially smooth surfaces that are each provided on a part of their circumference with shaping structures N and K, respectively, extending in the longitudinal direction of folding rolls 11, 12, where N generally stands for recesses and K generally stands for elevations. The length of the specific shaping structures 14a, b, c and 15a, b, c, respectively, that are provided here essentially corresponds to that of a portion of the paper surface that is to be folded in the packaging process.
Shaping structures 14a-c and 15a-c are so designed in shape and in their arrangement along the respective folding roll 11 and 12 that they positively interlock once in a complete revolution of folding roll pair 11, 12.
According to
In principle, at least three basic shapes are possible, e.g. a spike shape K1 and N1, a wedge shape N2, K2, or a cylinder envelope shape N3, K3. In the case of very sensitive paper grades, the use of a rounded, cylinder envelope shaped cross-section of the shaping structure is advantageous to prevent cutting apart the foil.
In the schematic cross-sectional view in
Depending on the packaging foil type, it is also possible to provide only one folding roll with an elevated shaping structure and to use a roll of a non-metallic material having an elastic surface such as rubber as the second folding roll while the folding roll that is provided with shaping structures is made of steel.
Synchronizing unit 17 comprises a device 18 for detecting the relative position of work cadence A1 of first embossing unit 2 with respect to process cadence P of the packaging installation. This may e.g. include a continuous optical detection of the position of surface structures 28, 29 that have been embossed on packaging foil 16 in embossing unit 2. The detection takes place on transport path W between first embossing unit 2 and second embossing unit 10. The detected work cadence A1 is adapted to process cadence P in a positioning device 19. For this purpose, a manual and/or automated adaptation procedure may be contemplated. Thus, for example, embossing roll 3 may be temporarily disengaged from the drive in order to lengthen transport path W of packaging foil 16 by a desired amount that is in conformity with process cadence P. The demand-driven lengthening of transport path W of packaging foil 16 is compensated by a buffer unit 23a placed after first embossing unit 2.
In order to determine and control work cadence A2 of second embossing unit 10, device 1 additionally comprises a regulating unit 20. Regulating unit 20 comprises a comparing device 21 that allows detecting a quantitative deviation between work cadences A1 and A2 of first and second embossing units 2 and 10. This may e.g. be achieved continuously by optical means by a lamp that is configured for an illumination of the packaging foil at regular time intervals in the manner of a strobe. The illuminating frequency preferably corresponds to the process cadence. In this manner, an optical detection of the relative position of the surface structures applied in first embossing unit 2 and of folding breaks 27a-c formed on packaging foil 16 in second embossing unit 10 is accomplished.
Besides the optical synchronization, other means may be contemplated, e.g. a visual detection or a manual adjustment of the positioning device by which work cadence A1 of regulating unit 17 is synchronized to work cadence A2 of second regulating unit 20. Instead of optical synchronization signals, electronic synchronization signals or else mechanical synchronizing means can be used, for example a plurality of gearwheels and/or belts that may be equipped with an angle and/or position adjusting mechanism.
Instead of a synchronization of regulating unit 20 by means of regulating unit 17, the inverse process of an adaptation of the work cadence of first embossing unit 2, which is controlled by regulating unit 17, by means of regulating unit 20 is conceivable in order to achieve an uniform synchronization with the process cadence. In both synchronization modes, a serial two-stage synchronization is used in order to detect possible deviations in the work cadences of the two embossing units both from process cadence P and among themselves, thereby achieving a finer alignment.
The information obtained in this manner is subsequently used in a positioning device 22 in order to adapt work cadence A2 to work cadence A1 in such a manner that folding breaks 27a-c are formed on packaging foil 16 at the desired relative positions. Positioning device 22 may e.g. be configured for a manual and/or automated adjustment of the circumferential position of driven folding roll 11 relative to packaging foil 16. For this purpose, a coupling for disengaging folding roll 11 from roll drive 13 may be contemplated. In addition, this allows a demand-driven or process-dependent variation of the relative position of folding breaks 27a-c on packaging foil 16.
Moreover, comparing device 21 may also be used for detecting the relative deviation of work cadence A2 from process cadence P for an additional verification of the synchronization to the subsequent packaging process. Furthermore, it is possible in this manner to obtain indirect indications of an involuntary deviation of work cadence A2 from work cadence A1 as work cadence A1 is already synchronized to process cadence P by means of synchronizing unit 17.
For a demand-driven modification of transport path W of packaging foil 16 in the case of an intervention of positioning device 22, another buffer unit 23b is provided after second embossing unit 10.
In the subsequent packaging process 25, the packaging foil 16 provided with folding breaks 27a-c is continuously supplied to the packaging machine at the process cadence P. After cutting the paper to the required length by the cutting head of the packaging machine, blank 32 is directly folded around the cigarettes 26 to be packaged. Due to folding breaks 27a-c, this requires only a small force, thereby effectively preventing a destruction of the packaged items. Folding breaks 27a-c are preferably located at the bottom of the thus formed package, two folding operations being performed along folding edges 30a and 30b.
In
The number and the design of shaping structures N and K on folding rolls 11, 12 and thus of the formed folding breaks 27a-f are determined by the material or the process requirements in function of the type of packaging foil 16 that is used. For example, in the present exemplary embodiment, six folding breaks 27a-f of approx. 0.2 mm depth are provided at a paper thickness of 0.05 mm.
Furthermore, the formation of folding breaks 27a-f is possible not only at the package bottom but also in other areas of blank 32, for example in the lid area. For this purpose, additional shaping structures 14, 15 may be provided on folding rolls 11, 12. Alternatively, the arrangement of additional shaping structures on folding rolls 11, 12 can be contemplated. The position of the thus created additional upper folding breaks is indicated in
In another package type that is illustrated in
A third package type as it is used in a so-called “shoulder box” is illustrated in
As explained earlier already, the operation of folding the package and the introduction of the packaged items into the latter are carried out in a simultaneous process segment, so that damages or the destruction of the packaged items by the forces required for folding have to be prevented.
In
The procedure for creating folding breaks 37a, b and 38a, b shown in
In this manner, by a suitable arrangement of groups 40 to 47 along the roll surfaces and a suitable spacing of individual shaping structures within the respective groups 40 to 47, the desired foldability of the packaging foil at the intended folding positions PU1, PU2 and PO1, PO2, respectively, is achieved while simultaneously minimizing the undesirable disturbance of the esthetic appearance by folding breaks 37a, b and 38a, b. Thus, the number resp. spacing of individual shaping structures is varied according to folding positions PU1, PU2 and PO1, PO2, respectively in the top, bottom or side areas in order to obtain the desired effect. This constitutes a complementary measure to the already mentioned suitable choice of the cross-sectional shape of the shaping structures.
Besides the shape of the individual shaping structures as well as their number and mutual spacing, the rotational speed of folding rolls 11, 12 also represents an important influencing parameter with respect to the formation of folding breaks 37a, b, 38a, b and to the resulting foldability of packaging foil 32. To increase the quality of the folding breaks, it is advantageous to slow down the rotary motion at this moment and to increase it to the normal speed again after the folding operations.
This may possibly involve technical difficulties as a speed variation of folding rolls 11, 12 may disturb the synchronization to work cadence A1 of first embossing unit 2 and to process cadence P that is adjusted thereto. The problem is solved by the previously described continuous synchronization of work cadence A2 of second embossing unit 20 with respect to work cadence A1 of first embossing unit 2 by means of regulating units 20 and 17, whereby a simple restoration of the correct work cadence of second embossing unit 20 with respect to the process cadence is possible even in the case of temporary deviations within a cadence segment.
More specifically, the temporary deceleration of the folding roll rotation is compensated by a subsequent acceleration within the same cadence unit, the amount of acceleration being determinable on the basis of the deviations between the work cadences of first and second embossing units 2 and 10 that are detected by comparing device 21. The cadence adjustment is then achieved through an acceleration by means of corresponding regulation signals between regulating units 17, 20. This allows a consistent process cadence in spite of temporary speed deviations within a cadence segment.
The principle of the procedure is schematized in
The rotational speed is kept constant until the formation of folding breaks 37b within rotation angle α3. Only in rotation angle sector β3 starts another acceleration to the value v3 in order to restore the process cadence and a subsequent deceleration to the value v1 so that folding breaks 38b are formed in the desired quality within rotation angle α4. The overall procedure corresponds to process cadence P.
The first exemplary embodiment, particularly according to
Device 50 comprises the same first embossing unit 2 as in the first example whereas second embossing unit 51 has two folding rolls 52 and 53 on which the interpenetrating shaping structures 54 and 55 as well as 56 and 57 are arranged circularly instead of longitudinally. The shape and kind of these shaping structures N and K may be the same as previously. The drive and synchronization means of the folding rolls are same as previously.
In
Based on the two depicted examples having shaping structures that extend longitudinally or transversely to the roll axis, any combination of the two arrangements as well as any desired number of structural elements may be used while the parameters required for the synchronization of the embossing units to the work cadence of the installation can be calculated according to the given examples.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
07405248.1 | Aug 2007 | EP | regional |
08405041.8 | Feb 2008 | EP | regional |