This application is a National Stage of International Application No. PCT/EP2011/057993 filed May 17, 2011, claiming priority based on French Patent Application No. 1053841 filed May 18, 2010, the contents of all of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
The invention relates to a novel device for driving and blocking an undercarriage having a breaker strut.
The strut 2 is coupled firstly to the leg of the undercarriage, and secondly to the structure of the aircraft, while the locking member is coupled firstly to the strut 2 and secondly to the leg, or else to the structure of the aircraft.
It is known to cause the undercarriage to move by making use firstly of a raising actuator, e.g. an actuator 8 coupled to the leg of the undercarriage, and secondly an unlocking actuator 9 that serves to make the locking member inactive.
Thus, starting from the deployed position, the unlocking actuator 9 is actuated initially, which acts against the stabilizing member 3 in order to force the two links of the stabilizing member 3 to move out of alignment, consequently forcing the two connecting rods of the strut to move out of alignment. Once moved out of alignment in this way, they can no longer oppose raising of the undercarriage under drive from the raising actuator.
It is known to use a hydraulic actuator as the unlocking actuator 9. Nevertheless, in order to simplify the management of the various actuators within an aircraft, the person skilled in the art is seeking to replace hydraulic actuators with electric actuators. Electric actuators are already available, but they remain complex, cumbersome to implement, and also to keep in operational condition.
The invention seeks to propose a device for unlocking the locking member that is simple, reliable, and capable of making use of a simple electric actuator.
In order to achieve this object, the invention provides an aircraft undercarriage comprising a leg hinged to the aircraft about a raising axis, the leg being stabilized in the deployed position by a strut comprising two hinged-together connecting rods, the strut being maintained in its aligned position by a stabilizing member comprising two hinged-together links, one of the links being hinged to the strut and another link being hinged to the leg or to the aircraft, said links being held in a substantially aligned and locked position, the undercarriage including an unlocking device comprising:
the crank (63) being actuatable between a first angular position in which the pin (31) is in contact with the pawl (64) facing the step (65) while the links are substantially in alignment, and a second angular position that the crank (63) reaches when the step (65) of the pawl (64) has pushed back the pin (31), taking the links (3a, 3b) of the stabilizer member (3) out of alignment.
Thus, the unlocking device enables the stabilizing member to be released using an actuator that is simple, and without any permanent connection being established between the links of the stabilizing member and the actuator, such that if the actuator jams, the undercarriage can still be operated.
In this respect, and in a particular embodiment, the unlocking device includes an emergency control enabling the pawl to be separated from the pin in the event of the actuator failing while lowering the undercarriage.
In a particular embodiment, the unlocking device also makes it possible to block the links of the stabilizing member in a substantially aligned position.
Advantageously, the link that carries the pin includes an escape wheel co-operating with the pawl to separate the pawl from the pin during the movement of the actuator from the first angular position to the second angular position.
The invention can be better understood in the light of the figures of the accompanying drawings given by way of non-limiting example, and in which, in addition to above-described
a is a fragmentary view of the unlocking device shown in
a to 4d are views of the same unlocking device, showing it in various stages during the raising of the undercarriage;
a to 5d are views of the same blocking device, showing it at various stages in the deployment of the undercarriage;
a to 6d are views of the same unlocking device, showing it at various stages in the deployment of the undercarriage in the event of the rotary actuator failing; and
With reference to
With reference now to
a to 4d show the operation of the unlocking device 6 when the undercarriage goes from the deployed position to the retracted position.
As shown in
a to 5d show the process of deploying the undercarriage. Prior to deploying the undercarriage, the actuator 2 is caused to return from its second position R to its first position D, the escape wheel 32 sliding on the body of the pawl 64 without the escape wheel 32 coming into co-operation with the step 65, as shown in
a to 6d show the operation of the unlocking device 6 in the event of a possible failure of the actuator 2, with the actuator remaining blocked in the second angular position R. As shown in
For this purpose, the unlocking device 6 may include an emergency actuator 92, as shown in
The invention as described above enables simple rotary actuators to be used that are light in weight and reliable, such as stepper electric motors, with this being made possible by an arrangement of simple and reliable mechanical parts. Furthermore, the undercarriage can always be unblocked by simple external action, regardless of the blocking situation since the connection between the actuator and the stabilizing member is not a permanent connection.
The invention is not limited to the above description, but on the contrary covers any variant coming within the ambit defined by the claims.
In particular,
The unlocking device 6 may be placed on the aircraft, on the strut 2, or on the leg 7 of the undercarriage. These various locations do not modify the device or its operation in any way. For this purpose, the support 61 of the unlocking device 6 is optional, it being possible for the actuator 2 to be mounted directly on the aircraft, on the strut 2, or on the leg 7.
In addition, the return means of the pawl 64 urging it to bear against the pin 31 may include, in addition to or as a replacement for the spring 67, a torsion spring on the hinge between the crank 63 and the pawl 64.
Finally, the escape wheel 32 allows the pawl 64 to escape in the event of the actuator 2 becoming blocked in its second angular position. Nevertheless, this arrangement is not essential. Other means could be envisaged, and in particular it is possible to lengthen the rod 68 of the pawl 64 so that it bears continuously against the pin 31. The operation of the unlocking device 6 would then be substantially the same as that described with reference to
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 53841 | May 2010 | FR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2011/057993 | 5/17/2011 | WO | 00 | 1/29/2013 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2011/144629 | 11/24/2011 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2579180 | Eldred | Dec 1951 | A |
3556440 | Lallemant | Jan 1971 | A |
4720063 | James et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
5110068 | Grande et al. | May 1992 | A |
5207398 | Veaux et al. | May 1993 | A |
5269481 | Derrien | Dec 1993 | A |
5429323 | Derrien et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
7731124 | Griffin | Jun 2010 | B2 |
8602352 | Keller et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
20090108131 | Lavigne et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20110163202 | Martinez et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 555 121 | Aug 1993 | EP |
2 928 623 | Sep 2009 | FR |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report for PCT/EP2011/057993 dated Mar. 15, 2012. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130119197 A1 | May 2013 | US |