The invention relates generally to communication and more particularly to optical communication.
Optical transmitters employing Directly Modulated Lasers (DML) such as Vertical Cavity Surface Emitting Lasers (VCSELs) are rated to operate up to a predetermined data rate. Problematically, when operating at higher data rates, distortion from the DML itself limits performance of the device and thus the data link. The DML transmits an optical signal that differs from the drive signal provided thereto such that signal reception is substantially affected beyond short transmission distances. Added jitter and vertical eye closure from distortion introduced by VCSEL can cause significant reduction in signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). These limitations on performance place a limit on the transmission distances for higher data rates.
Linear filters are used conventionally to partially compensate for the distortion due to the DML itself. However, linear filters fail to achieve optimal compensation for the distortion. It would be advantageous to overcome some of the shortcomings of the prior art.
In accordance with an aspect of at least one embodiment there is provided a component having repeatable distortion characteristics; and a drive circuit for providing a drive signal and comprising a non-linear filter for pre-compensating for distortion introduced by the component having repeatable distortion characteristics in response to the drive signal, the error having a non-linear response to the drive signal.
In accordance with an aspect of at least one embodiment there is provided a method comprising: providing a drive current for driving a Directly Modulated Laser (DML); filtering the drive current with a non-linear filter to provide pre-compensated drive current pre-compensated for errors in a signal resulting from driving the DML with the drive current, wherein an output signal from the DML in response to the pre-compensated drive current better approximates the drive current to incur reduced errors.
In accordance with an aspect of at least one embodiment of the invention there is provided a circuit comprising: an input port for receiving a first signal; a plurality of taps, each tap comprising an input port for receiving a tap input signal, a first input port for receiving a first weight, a second input port for receiving a second other weight, and a biasing circuit for biasing an applied weighting between the first weight and the second weight to bias the tap signal, the biased tap signal for modifying the first signal.
The following description is presented to enable a person skilled in the art to make and use the invention, and is provided in the context of a particular application and its requirements. Various modifications to the disclosed embodiments will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the general principles defined herein may be applied to other embodiments and applications without departing from the scope of the invention. Thus, the present invention is not intended to be limited to the embodiments disclosed, but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and features disclosed herein.
Referring to
Referring now to the eye diagram that is shown on the left-hand side of
The distortion artifacts resulting from DML optical response are amplitude dependent and thus non-linear in nature. The rising edge and falling edge responses are different and they each need to be compensated differently. Further, compensating one edge response may adversely affect the other edge or may fail to achieve significant improvement without compensating for the other edge as well. Thus, conventional approaches using linear filters for compensating for the distortion from the DML response are not optimal.
A second problem is implementation efficiency. If the distortion is repeatable and calculable, it may be possible using a DSP to reduce the nonlinear distortion within the DML signal; that said, such an implementation would be costly and would not lend itself to inexpensive, low power and compact implementation. A more simple non-linear distortion reduction method would be preferred.
Referring now to
Because the distortion is non-linear in nature, a linear filter is not suitable to addressing the distortion concerns completely. In fact, such a linear filter, will fail to substantially correct the problems disclosed above, reducing distortion in one of the rising or falling edge response while compounding the distortion in the other.
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring again to
Just looking to the falling edge, it is seen that whereas without filtering, the signal bounces at the bottom down and up, with filtering the signal remains substantially in alignment with the desired signal contour. On the rising edge, two notable bounces are reduced to one smaller bounce, thereby limiting the effect of the bounce on the top of the eye.
As is seen in each of the circuit diagrams, two currents proportional to weights are shown designated with “w” (w_0 and w_1) being multiplexed into the scaling circuit for each tap determined by level of the input signal (Dp, Dn). Alternatively, the currents proportional to weights are applied to a scaling circuit such that they are first scaled by the input signal (Dp, Dn) followed by the tap signal (Tnp, Tnn). Further alternatively, currents proportional to the weights are applied to a scaling circuit where the signals being scaled are a logical combination of input signal (Dp, Dn) and the tap signal (Tnp, Tnn). The logical combinations include input signal (Dp,Dn) logically OR'd with tap signal (Tnp, Tnn) designated as “Dp+Tnp”; and input signal (Dp, Dn) logically AND'd with tap signal (Tnp, Tnn) designated as “Dp.Tnp”. The scaled version of these logically combined signals in current form is then summed through a wire OR to produce a single tap contribution that is dependent on the weights and the input signal amplitude. Multiple tap contributions are summed to generate a resulting signal that has an amplitude dependent non-linear characteristic.
Though
Though the above embodiments are directed to pre-compensating the drive current, filtering of received signals to improve data detection is also supported. The general architecture for non-linear filter as shown in
In use, a circuit is designed and manufactured. Once manufactured, the circuit is tested with a representative DML component and based on the combined circuit and DML transmit signal characteristics, the non-linear FIR filter weights are adjusted to pre-compensate the drive current for the DML. Thus, each product is compensated individually, accounting for known DML response issues as well as circuit specific response issues for a given DML. Once compensated, the circuit operates in compensated mode. Optionally, the circuit's operating parameters are readjusted to re-compute the weights for the non-linear FIR filter at intervals.
In another embodiment, the optical output signal is tapped and provided as feedback to the transmit circuit where the non-linear FIR filter is adjusted in response to changes in performance of the DML output signal. Further optionally, the circuit is designed and manufactured with fixed weighting for the non-linear FIR filter.
In another embodiment, the manufactured devices are tested, the non-linear FIR filter is tuned—weights are set—and the circuit is tested again. Based on its performance, the circuit is assigned a quality level. Thus, some manufactured drive circuits support 25 GHz while others support only 15 GHz—determined after tuning in the manufacturing stage. This allows for a more coarse tuning process with the performance assignment then dividing between circuits with best tuning and those with less effective tuning results.
Numerous other embodiments may be envisioned without departing from the scope of the invention.
This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 17/080,692, filed on Oct. 26, 2020, now U.S. Pat. No. 11,271,366, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 14/695,890, filed on Apr. 24, 2015, now abandoned, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/984,621, filed on Apr. 25, 2014, the contents of each of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5424680 | Nazarathy | Jun 1995 | A |
6973138 | Wright | Dec 2005 | B1 |
7826752 | Zanoni et al. | Nov 2010 | B1 |
8083417 | Aronson et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
11271366 | Bhullar | Mar 2022 | B2 |
20110069749 | Forrester | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20130082773 | Yu | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20150063828 | Bliss | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150086216 | Xie | Mar 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2634934 | Apr 2013 | EP |
Entry |
---|
Kumar et al., “Impact of Nonlinearities of Fiber Optic Communications,” Optical and Fiber Communications Reports, 2011, p. 186. |
Warm, “Electronic Predistortion Strategies for Directly Modulated Laser System,” 15 pages, Berlin 2009. |
Winzer et al., “Spectrally Efficient Long-Haul Optical Networking Using 112-Gb/s Polarization-Multiplexed 16-QAM,” Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 28, No. 4, 2010, pp. 547-556. |
Berndt, “Blind Adaptation of a Decision Feedback Equalizer for use in a 10Gbps Serial Link,” Carleton University Thesis, Jan. 2007, 96 pages. |
Chandramouli, “A Novel Analog Decision-Feedback Equalizer in CMOS for Serial 10-GB/sec Data Transmission Systems,” Georgia Institute of Technology Thesis, Dec. 2007, 130 pages. |
Hekkala, “Compensation of transmitter nonlinearities using predistortion techniques.” University of Oulu Thesis, 2014, 102 pages. |
Sewter et al., “A 3-Tap FIR Filter With Cascaded Distributed Tap Amplifier for Equalization Up to 40 Gb/s in 0.18 m CMOS,” IEEE Journal of Solid State Circuits, vol. 41, No. 8, Aug. 2006, pp. 1919-1929. |
Thakkar, “Design of Multi-Gb/s Multi-Coefficient Mixed-Signal Equalizers,” University of California Berkeley, Thesis, 2012, 127 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220149594 A1 | May 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61984621 | Apr 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 17080692 | Oct 2020 | US |
Child | 17584296 | US | |
Parent | 14695890 | Apr 2015 | US |
Child | 17080692 | US |