Generally, the present invention relates to magnetic devices. More particularly, the present invention relates to devices, systems and methods for obtaining magnetic measurements.
Electromagnetic based instruments can be used for measuring properties of matter and/or used for identifying its composition. For example, an electromagnetic based instrument capable of performing magnetic resonance spectroscopy can be used to obtain physical, chemical and/or structural information about matter (e.g., a molecule). Typically, in order to perform magnetic resonance spectroscopy, for example to provide high quality measurements of an object/subject (e.g., high resolution image and/or image contrast), it can be desirable for the magnetic field inside of a zone of measurement (e.g., an area where an object is to be measured is positioned) to be substantially stable and/or uniform. Other applications (e.g., magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)) can also require a high, stable, and/or uniform magnetic field strength.
Some systems that use magnetic fields for measurements can include magnetic coils to create the magnetic fields, with application of current to the coil, while other systems can utilize permanent magnets to create the magnetic fields, which typically do not require application of a current.
One difficulty in creating a magnetic field in a zone of measurement with permanent magnet(s) that is sufficient for magnetic resonance spectroscopy and/or magnetic imaging (e.g., that is substantially stable and/or uniform) is that magnetic fields produced by the permanent magnets(s) can be non-homogeneous, thus typically resulting in a non-homogenous magnetic field within the zone of measurement.
Some current solutions for creating a homogenous and/or stable magnetic field within a zone of measurement using a permanent magnet can include adding additional elements to an imaging device (e.g., coils) and/or increasing the size of the permanent magnets. One difficulty with current solutions is that as the number of elements in a magnetic measurement device increases and/or the size of the permanent magnets increases, the weight, size and/or cost of the device can increase.
Another difficulty with current solutions is that a magnetic measurement device that is heavy can cause a lack of mobility. For example, for magnetic measurement devices in a hospital setting (e.g., magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) devices), a heavy and/or large device can prevent hospital personnel from moving an MRI. This can cause further difficulties, when imaging patients that can be hard to move (e.g., patients that are hooked up to multiple life support and/or monitoring equipment).
In another example, for magnetic measurement devices in an industrial setting (e.g., nuclear magnetic measurement (NMR) devices that measure properties of fluids and/or drilling muds in oil production facilities), a heavy and/or large device can prevent personnel from measuring the fluids/muds at various locations in the processes.
Therefore it can be desirable to achieve a desired magnetic field strength, having sufficient homogeneity and/or stability, and/or reducing a total weight of a magnetic measurement system.
There is thus provided, in accordance with some embodiments of the invention, a magnetic field device, including a first magnet, a first ferromagnetic element positioned adjacent to the first magnet, a second magnet, a second ferromagnetic element positioned adjacent to the second magnet and relative to the first ferromagnetic element to create a gap between the first ferromagnetic element and the second ferromagnetic element, and a third magnet positioned between the first ferromagnetic element and the second ferromagnetic element and within the gap.
In some embodiments, the third magnet has a first surface that faces a first surface of the first ferromagnetic element and a second surface that faces a first surface of the second ferromagnetic element. In some embodiments, the first surface of the third magnet abuts the first surface of the first ferromagnetic element and the second surface of the third magnet abuts the first surface of the first ferromagnetic element. In some embodiments, the third magnet has a dimension that allows the third magnet to translate between a first position and a second position, the first position being the first surface of the first ferromagnetic element, the second position being the first surface of the second ferromagnetic element
In some embodiments, the magnetic field device further includes a fourth magnet positioned between the first ferromagnetic element and the second ferromagnetic element and within the gap. In some embodiments, the fourth magnet has a first surface that faces a first surface of the first ferromagnetic element and a second surface that faces a first surface of the second ferromagnetic element. In some embodiments, the fourth magnet has a dimension that allows the fourth magnet to translate between a first position and a second position, the first position being the first surface of the first ferromagnetic element, the second position being the first surface of the second ferromagnetic element.
In some embodiments, the first magnet, the second magnet and the third magnet are permanent magnets, superconducting magnets, or resistive magnets. In some embodiments, the first magnet, the second magnet and the third magnet have dimensions that are based on a desired magnetic field strength, a type of object to be imaged, or any combination thereof. In some embodiments, the first magnet, the second magnet and the third magnet has a length between 10 and 1100 millimeters, a width between 10 and 300 millimeters, and a height between 45 and 200 millimeters.
In some embodiments, the gap has dimensions that are based on a type of object to be imaged. In some embodiments, the gap has a diameter of 190 millimeters. In some embodiments, the magnetic field device further includes at least one fifth magnet coupled to the first magnet.
In some embodiments, the third magnet is positioned to cause a decrease of a magnetic field that is peripheral to the magnetic field device. In some embodiments, a first axis of the magnetic field device is defined as passing from the first ferromagnetic element to the second ferromagnetic element, wherein the first magnet and the second magnet are positioned to cause a magnetic field with a magnetization direction along the first axis, and wherein the third magnet is positioned to cause a magnetic field with a magnetization direction along the first axis.
In some embodiments, the magnetization direction of the third magnet is opposite of the magnetization direction of the first magnet. In some embodiments, the magnetic field device is positioned within an outer shell, the outer shell including a metal alloy. In some embodiments, at least one of the first and second magnets emits a magnetic field with a predetermined magnetic field strength, wherein the third magnet emits a magnetic field with a predetermined magnetic field strength, and wherein the strength of the magnetic field of at least one of the first and second magnets is substantially greater than the strength of the magnetic field of the third magnet. In some embodiments the total magnetic field produced during operation of the magnetic field device is substantially homogeneous and uniform within the gap
There is thus provided, in accordance with some embodiments of the invention, a method of directing magnetic fields into a measurement volume, the method including generating a first magnetic field in a first direction with a first magnetic field strength, distributing the first magnetic field into the measurement volume to create a substantially uniform magnetic flux, and increasing a total magnetic flux into the measurement volume by directing a second magnetic field in a second direction with a second magnetic field strength, wherein the second direction is parallel to the first direction.
In some embodiments, the method further includes directing a third magnetic field into the measurement volume in a third direction, wherein the third direction is perpendicular to the first direction. In some embodiments, the method further includes positioning an object within the measurement volume, and performing magnetic field analysis on the object.
In some embodiments, at least one of the first magnetic field strength, and the second magnetic field strength is between 0.5 and 1.5 Tesla. In some embodiments, the first magnetic field strength and the first direction, and the second magnetic field strength and the second direction are based on a size of the measurement volume, a type of object to be measured, or any combination thereof. In some embodiments, the total magnetic flux in the measurement volume is a substantially homogeneous field.
There is thus provided, in accordance with some embodiments of the invention, a magnetic field device including a first magnet, a first ferromagnetic element positioned adjacent to the first magnet, a second magnet, a second ferromagnetic element positioned adjacent to the second magnet and relative to the first ferromagnetic element to create a gap between the first ferromagnetic element and the second ferromagnetic element, a third magnet positioned between the first ferromagnetic element and the second ferromagnetic element and within the gap, and a shell positioned at a predetermined distance from the first magnet and the second magnet, to envelop at least the first magnet and the second magnet, wherein the predetermined distance is based on the desired magnetic field strength, and wherein thickness of the shell corresponds to the predetermined distance. There is thus provided, in accordance with some embodiments of the invention, a method of directing magnetic fields into a measurement volume, the method generating a first magnetic field in a first direction with a first magnetic field strength, distributing the first magnetic field into the measurement volume to create a substantially uniform magnetic flux, increasing a total magnetic flux into the measurement volume by directing a second magnetic field in a second direction with a second magnetic field strength, wherein the second direction is parallel to the first direction, and determining a distance to position a shell from the measurement volume that can generate the first magnetic field strength and the second magnetic field strength based on the size of the measurement volume, wherein positioning the shell at the distance from the measurement volume substantially eliminates a magnetic field outside of the shell.
The subject matter regarded as the invention is particularly pointed out and distinctly claimed in the concluding portion of the specification. The invention, however, both as to organization and method of operation, together with objects, features, and advantages thereof, can be understood by reference to the following detailed description when read with the accompanying drawings in which:
It will be appreciated that for simplicity and clarity of illustration, elements shown in the figures have not necessarily been drawn to scale. For example, the dimensions of some of the elements can be exaggerated relative to other elements for clarity. Further, where considered appropriate, reference numerals can be repeated among the figures to indicate corresponding or analogous elements.
In the following detailed description, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the invention. However, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that the present invention can be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known methods, procedures, and components have not been described in detail so as not to obscure the present invention.
The first ferromagnetic element 102 can be coupled to and/or positioned adjacent to the first magnet 101. The second ferromagnetic element 122 can be coupled to and/or positioned adjacent to the second magnet 121. In some embodiments, the magnetic field device 100 can include a third magnet 130, positioned between the first ferromagnetic element 102 and the second ferromagnetic element 122.
The first and second ferromagnetic elements 102, 122 can be coupled and positioned adjacent to a corresponding first and second magnets 101, 121 such that the first and second ferromagnetic elements 102, 122 can be proximal to a gap 150 (e.g., zone of measurement) of the magnetic field device 100. The first magnet 101 and the second magnet 121 can be distal to the gap 150 of the magnetic field device 100. The magnetization direction of the first magnet 101 can be parallel to the magnetization direction of the second magnet 121, along the second axis (indicated “X” in
In various embodiments, dimensions of the gap 150 (and thus positioning on of the elements 102, 122, 101, 121) can depend on a subject/object to be measured. For example, if the subject to be measured is an adult human head gap 150 can have dimensions that comfortably fit an adult human head. In another example, if the subject to measured is a mouse, gap 150 can fit the mouse. It is apparent to one of ordinary skill that other objects/subjects can be measured, and that these are examples.
In some embodiments, the magnetic field device 200 can include additional magnets such as magnets 103, 123 in
The first and second ferromagnetic elements 202, 222 can be coupled to and positioned adjacent to its corresponding first and second magnets 201, 221 such that the first and second ferromagnetic elements 202, 222 can be proximal to a gap 250 (e.g., zone of measurement) of the magnetic field device 200. The first magnet 201 and the second magnet 221 can be distal to the gap 250 of the magnetic field device 200. The magnetization direction of the first magnet 201 can be parallel to the magnetization direction of the second magnet 221, along the second axis (indicated “X” in
The third magnet 230 can be coupled to and can be positioned between the first ferromagnetic element 202 and the second ferromagnetic element 222.
The third magnet 230 can have a first surface 231 that faces a first surface 204 of the first ferromagnetic element 202 and a second surface 232 that faces a first surface 224 of the second ferromagnetic element 222. The first surface 231 of the third magnet 230 can abut the first surface 204 of the first ferromagnetic element 202 and the second surface 232 of the third magnet 230 can abut the first surface 224 of the first ferromagnetic element 220. In some embodiments, the third magnet 230 can have a dimension that allows the third magnet 230 to translate between a first position and a second position, the first position being the first surface 204 of the first ferromagnetic element 202, the second position being the first surface 224 of the second ferromagnetic element 222.
The fourth magnet 240 can be positioned between the first ferromagnetic element 202 and the second ferromagnetic element 222 and within the gap 250. The fourth magnet 240 can have a first surface 241 that faces the first surface 204 of the first ferromagnetic element 202 and a second surface 242 that faces the first surface 224 of the second ferromagnetic element 222. The fourth magnet 240 can have a dimension that allows the fourth magnet 240 to translate between a first position and a second position, the first position being the first surface 204 of the first ferromagnetic element 202, the second position being the first surface 224 of the second ferromagnetic element 222.
As is apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art, while magnetic gradient coils (creating a magnetic field with application of current) can be utilized h the gap to provide a magnetic gradient, an embodiment of the invention uses permanent magnets that have no need for magnetic gradient coils.
In some embodiments, the first magnet 201, the second magnet 221 and the third magnet 230 are permanent magnets and/or superconducting magnets and/or resistive magnets. The first magnet 201, the second magnet 221 and the third magnet 230 can have dimensions that are based on a desired magnetic field strength, a type of object to be imaged, or any combination thereof.
In some embodiments, at least one of the first magnet 201, the second magnet 221 and the third magnet 230 has a length between 10 and 1100 millimeters, a width between 10 and 300 millimeters, and a height between 45 and 200 millimeters.
Each of the magnets of magnetic field device 200 has a direction of magnetization and creates a magnetic field. The dashed arrows in
The first magnet 201 and second magnet 221 can have the same magnetization direction along a first axis (indicated “Y” in
The magnetization direction of the third magnet 230 can be opposite to the magnetization direction of the first and second magnets 201, 221 for instance along the first axis (indicated “Y” in
In some embodiments, the first ferromagnetic element 202 and the second ferromagnetic element 222 can extend and can direct the magnetic field produced by the corresponding first magnet 201 and second magnet 221, and/or reduce noise from outside of the magnetic field device 200.
In some embodiments, the magnetic field device 200 can include additional magnets. For example, turning to
In some embodiments, the magnetic field device 200 can include additional magnets 203, 223 while the third magnet 230 can be coupled to the first and second ferromagnetic elements 202, 222.
In various embodiments, the fifth and sixth magnets 203, 223 are positioned around the first and second magnets 201, 221, respectively, for instance the sixth magnet 223 can be positioned around the second magnet 221.
The fifth and sixth magnets 203, 223 can have a magnetization direction perpendicular to the magnetization direction of the first magnets 201 along a second axis (indicated “X” in
As is apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art, additional magnets can be included in the magnetic field device 200. For example, in some embodiments, additional third magnets, fifth magnets and/or first magnets can be used.
In some embodiments, the outer shell 211 can include a metal alloy, and can allow confining (or substantially confining) the magnetic field created by the magnets of magnetic field device 200 within the outer shell 211. In this manner, the existence of a magnetic field outside of the outer shell 211 can be zero and/or negligible. For example, if a device that is susceptible to the effects of a magnetic field (e.g., cell phone, pacemaker, etc.) is positioned adjacent to the outer shell 211 outside of the device 200, the magnetic field in that location can have a negligible effect on the device. In some embodiments, outer shell 111 can also have an opening so as to provide access to the gap 250.
In various embodiments, the third magnet 230 and/or the fourth magnet 240 can have a hollow structure and surround the gap 250 between the first and second ferromagnetic elements 202, 222. In various embodiments, the third magnet 230 and/or the fourth magnet 240 can be provided in a variety of shapes and sized, for instance cylindrical or triangular, with varying shape and size.
In case that magnetic field device 200 is utilized for magnetic resonant imaging, additional electromagnetic elements can be included, such as a radio frequency (RF) generator or field sensors. The third magnet 230 can be configured to surround the gap 250 between the first and second ferromagnetic elements 202, 222 in order to for example, prevent radiation leakage from additional electromagnetic elements, for instance RF generator in magnetic resonance devices. For example, third magnet 230 can be in a shape of a hollow cube or a hollow cylinder surrounding gap 250 in order to, for example, prevent radiation leakage from additional electromagnetic elements outside of third magnet 230.
The third magnet 230 can contribute to causing the overall magnetic field to be a homogeneous and/or uniform magnetic field, for magnetic field device 200 in the area of measurement. The third magnet 230 can allow for a reduction of size, weight, and/or magnetic field strength of the first and/or second magnets 201, 221 and/or the fifth and/or sixth magnets 203, 223 due to, for example, the third magnet 230 contributing to the overall magnetic field strength within the gap. A reduction in size of the first and/or second magnets 201, 221 and/or the fifth and/or sixth magnets 203, 223, can allow for a having lower weight of the magnetic field device with substantially the same field strength compared to, for example, a magnetic field device that does not include the third magnet 230.
In some embodiments, magnetic field device 200 includes two fifth magnets 203, and also includes two sixth magnets 223. In these embodiments, the ability to reduce the size of the magnets due to, for example, the third magnet 230 can provide even further weight reduction of the magnetic field device.
In some embodiments, at least one of the first and second magnets 201, 221 emits a magnetic field with a predetermined magnetic field strength, wherein the third magnet 230 can emit a magnetic field with a predetermined magnetic field strength, and wherein the strength of the magnetic field of at least one of the first and second magnets 201, 221 can be substantially greater than the strength of the magnetic field of the third magnet 230.
According to some embodiments, the outer shell 211 can constitute the main bulk of the weight of the magnetic field device 200. Since the addition of the third magnet 230 can reduce weight of other components as well as provide a homogeneous and uniform magnetic field, it can be possible to utilize an outer shell with reduced weight. In some embodiments, a reduction of at least twenty percent can be created for the total weight of the magnetic field device 200 in comparison to, for example, devices that do not have the third magnet. In some embodiments, an increase of at least thirty percent can be created for the magnetic field strength, for example in comparison to, for example, device that do not have the third magnet but have substantially the same total weight of the magnetic field device 200. The third magnet 230 can allow obtaining stronger magnetic fields and/or lower total magnet weight.
In some embodiments, the area of the fringe field can be reduced from the center of the gap, for example for a limit of a field of about 1 Gauss (sometimes referred to as the 1G line) can be reduced at substantially 100 millimeters. Therefore, reduction of fringe field can cause the dimensions of the outer shell 211 to be reduced, for example, from substantially 860×1032 millimeters to substantially 786×894 millimeters. Reduction of the outer shell 211 can accordingly cause a reduction of the total weight of magnetic field device 200.
Overall weight of a magnetic field device can be reduced, and for example an increase of over ten percent for the ratio of magnetic field strength to total weight of at least the combination of the first and second magnets and the at least one third magnet. In some embodiments, an increase in magnetic field caused by the third magnets can be larger than the increase that may be achieved by a corresponding enlargement of the first and second magnets (without a third magnet). This is due to the alignment of the third permanent magnets and also due to the scalability of the weight savings such that addition of magnets can cause a reduction of weight.
In some embodiments, the outer shell 211 can also have a smaller surface area compared to a commercially available magnetic resonance device, due to a reduction in fringe weight of the outer shell and/or due to reduction of the fringe field. Such reduction can occur since the addition of the third magnet 230 can increase magnetic field in the gap 250, between the first and second ferromagnetic elements 202, 222 and therefore reduce the fringe field of the magnetic field device 200 so that there is no longer a need for the outer shell 211 to be at same large weight and large surface area, for example compared to a commercially available magnetic resonance device.
In some embodiments, additional material, for example including Iron, can be added to magnetic field device 200 in order to further confine and manipulate the magnetic field in the gap. In some embodiments, the added material, for example including Iron and/or Titanium, can be added adjacent to at least one magnet 201 and/or adjacent to at least one ferromagnetic element 202.
It may be appreciated that regions of high magnetic flux density causing external fringe fields can occur adjacent to connection of the magnets, e.g., indicated with a dashed line in
In some embodiments, the third magnet 230 can prevent at least a portion of magnetic flux from exiting a gap (e.g., an area where the magnetic field is directed). Magnetic field device 200 can be utilized in order to provide a strong magnetic field while providing reduced weight of the device, for example utilized for magnetic resonant imaging or for other devices where a strong magnetic field can be required. It may be appreciated that addition of the third magnets can counter the magnetic flux, for example in regions indicated with a dashed line in
According to some embodiments, an existing magnetic field system that includes two magnets, neither of which includes a third magnet can be modified with insertion of at least one third magnet between the two magnets, in order to, for example, increase the magnetic field within the gap and/or reduce the fringe field. For example, a comparison between three systems: a first system “A” without third magnets, a second system “B” provided with at least one third magnet, and a third system “C” that is modified with the addition of at least one third magnet. In this example, in weight comparison to the first system “A”, the second system “B” can have weight reduced at about 5.5%, while the third system “C” can have weight increase at about 6.5%. In this example, in comparison to the first system “A” of field strength in the gap, the second system “B” can have increase of about 15%, and the third system “C” can have increase of about 13%. In this example, in comparison to the first system “A” of fringe field reduction, the second system “B” can have decrease of about 55%, and the third system “C” can have decrease of about 16%. Therefore, in correct positioning of third magnets can provide various advantages to new systems as well as to existing systems that can be modified. It is apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art that the example provided above gives exemplary weight reduction values for explanatory purposes, and that other comparison weight configurations are within the scope of the invention.
Reference is now made to
The method includes generating a first magnetic field in a first direction with a first magnetic field strength (Step 301). For example, the first and second magnets 201 and 221 as described above in
The method can further include distributing the first magnetic field into the measurement volume to create a substantially uniform magnetic flux. (Step 302). For example, the first ferromagnetic element 202 and/or the second ferromagnetic element 222, as described above in
The method can further include increasing a total magnetic flux into the measurement volume by directing a second magnetic field in a second direction with a second magnetic field strength, where the second direction is parallel to the first direction (Step 303). For example, the third magnet 230 as described above in
In some embodiments, the method includes positioning an object within the measurement volume, and performing magnetic field analysis on the object (e.g., by using the magnetic device 200 within a NMR device and/or an MRI device).
In some embodiments, first, second and third magnetic fields are directed such that a desired magnetic field strength is achieved. The desired magnetic field strength can be based on a particular device performing the measurements and/or object to be measured. For example, the desired magnetic field strength can be between 0.5-1.5 T, for magnetic resonance imaging of living human tissue. As is apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art, the desired magnetic field strength shown is for exemplary purposes only, and that the desired magnetic field strengths can vary based on subject/application of the magnetic field.
In some embodiments, the first magnetic field strength and the first direction, and the second magnetic field strength and the second direction are based on a size of the measurement volume and/or type of object to be measured, and/or any combination thereof. In some embodiments, the total magnetic flux in the measurement volume can be a substantially homogeneous field.
Reference is now made to
According to some embodiments, an object (or a subject) can be introduced to the gap (or measurement region), for example in order to adjust an element therein, from any one of four possible directions due to, for example, the symmetry of the system. In some embodiments, access can also be provided for introduction of cameras, air conditioning and/or other equipment to be adjacent to the gap.
Reference is now made to
According to some embodiments, at least one third magnet 530 can be added to a first support element 511 such that at least one air gap (not shown) can be created between the third magnet 530 and the first and/or second magnets 201, 221. In some embodiments, instead of air gaps, a gap of diamagnetic material can be formed therein.
Reference is now made to
In some embodiments, magnetic resonance imaging elements (e.g., RF coil) can be coupled to the head magnetic field device 600 in order to allow imaging the head 610 of the patient within the gap 250. In an exemplary embodiment, the magnetic field strength for such a head magnet is above 4900 Gauss or about 4988 Gauss. In an exemplary embodiment, the field of view for MRI imaging within the gap 250 is a sphere with a diameter of about 190 millimeters. In an exemplary embodiment, the diameter of the opening 650 to the gap 250 is above 660 millimeters or about 665 millimeters. In an exemplary embodiment, the dimensions for a permanent head magnet are 1226×1226×866 millimeters.
According to some embodiments, the distance between the outer shell and the magnets can be modified to achieve a modified magnetic field. In some embodiments, the thickness of the outer shell can be modified in accordance with changes in the distance between the outer shell and the magnets.
Reference is now made to
In some embodiments, the shell can be positioned in a predetermined distance from the magnets, where the predetermined distance can be based on the desired magnetic field strength. In some embodiments, thickness of the shell corresponds to the predetermined distance. It may be appreciated that changing the distance between the shell and the magnets can also reduce the fringe field.
In some embodiments, the thickness of the shell inversely corresponds to the predetermined distance, such that the thickness decreases with increased distance between the shell and the magnets. In some embodiments, the thickness of the shell is based on the predetermined distance exceeding a predetermined threshold. In some embodiments, the predetermined distance is also based on the weight of the at least one magnet. In some embodiments, the predetermined distance is 50 millimeters.
A first curve 701 corresponds to constant thickness of the shell with change in the distance for a fringe field along the ‘Y’ axis as shown in
As can be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art, the fringe field is reduced with distancing of the outer shell, and at a distance of about 50 millimeters there is a substantial decrease in magnetic fringe field for all curves. Thus, a reduced magnetic fringe field can be achieved by changing the distance between the shell and the magnets.
According to some embodiments, the magnetic field within the measurement volume is substantially unaffected by the reduction of the fringe field caused by the increased distance between the shell and the magnets.
Reference is now made to
The method includes generating a first magnetic field in a first direction with a first magnetic field strength (Step 801). For example, the first and second magnets 201 and 221 as described above in
The method can further include distributing the first magnetic field into the measurement volume to create a substantially uniform magnetic flux (Step 802). For example, the first ferromagnetic element 202 and/or the second ferromagnetic element 222, as described above in
The method can further include increasing a total magnetic flux into the measurement volume by directing a second magnetic field in a second direction with a second magnetic field strength, wherein the second direction is parallel to the first direction (Step 803). For example, the third magnet 230 as described above in
The method can further include determining a distance to position a shell from the measurement volume that can generate the first magnetic field strength and the second magnetic field strength based on the size of the measurement volume, wherein positioning the shell at the distance from the measurement volume substantially eliminates a magnetic field outside of the shell (Step 804). For example, determining a distance to position the shell from the measurement volume such that the magnetic field outside of the shell is lower than a predetermined threshold.
In some embodiments, the method can further include reducing the thickness of the shell if the predetermined distance exceeds a predetermined threshold. In some embodiments, the method can further include decreasing the weight of the at least one magnet if the predetermined distance exceeds a predetermined threshold, and maintaining the desired magnetic field strength. In some embodiments, the predetermined distance is also based on strength of the fringe magnetic field.
Unless explicitly stated, the method embodiments described herein are not constrained to a particular order in time or chronological sequence. Additionally, some of the described method elements can be skipped, or they can be repeated, during a sequence of operations of a method.
Various embodiments have been presented. Each of these embodiments can of course include features from other embodiments presented, and embodiments not specifically described can include various features described herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1900342 | Hess | Mar 1933 | A |
2638087 | Livsey | May 1953 | A |
2708927 | Dixon | May 1955 | A |
3012836 | Smith | Dec 1961 | A |
3315671 | Creelman | Apr 1967 | A |
3470866 | Gittelson | Oct 1969 | A |
3534251 | Richards | Oct 1970 | A |
3655178 | Vezina | Apr 1972 | A |
3710791 | Deaton | Jan 1973 | A |
3920000 | Atherton | Nov 1975 | A |
4008388 | McLafferty | Feb 1977 | A |
4161172 | Pickering | Jul 1979 | A |
4509505 | Mercey | Apr 1985 | A |
4543959 | Sepponen | Oct 1985 | A |
4567894 | Bergman | Feb 1986 | A |
4612505 | Zijlstra | Sep 1986 | A |
4613820 | Edelstein | Sep 1986 | A |
4646045 | Chari | Feb 1987 | A |
4651099 | Vinegar | Mar 1987 | A |
4698611 | Vermilyea | Oct 1987 | A |
4712263 | Pronzinski | Dec 1987 | A |
4715073 | Butler | Dec 1987 | A |
4750474 | Dukhan | Jun 1988 | A |
4758813 | Holsinger | Jul 1988 | A |
4875485 | Matsutani | Oct 1989 | A |
4899109 | Tropp | Feb 1990 | A |
4931733 | Hanawa | Jun 1990 | A |
4934575 | Mustafa | Jun 1990 | A |
4936824 | Koch | Jun 1990 | A |
4937454 | Itoh | Jun 1990 | A |
4937545 | Chaillout | Jun 1990 | A |
4968961 | Miyajima | Nov 1990 | A |
5028872 | Nakabayashi | Jul 1991 | A |
5038515 | Moorhead | Aug 1991 | A |
5059906 | Yamanaka | Oct 1991 | A |
5100375 | Koch | Mar 1992 | A |
5153546 | Laskaris | Oct 1992 | A |
5235284 | Tahara | Aug 1993 | A |
5343151 | Cory | Aug 1994 | A |
5346022 | Krivec | Sep 1994 | A |
5359310 | Pissanetzky | Oct 1994 | A |
5402543 | Dietrich | Apr 1995 | A |
5419325 | Dumoulin | May 1995 | A |
5436607 | Chari | Jul 1995 | A |
5446934 | Frazier | Sep 1995 | A |
5509159 | Du-Bois | Apr 1996 | A |
5534669 | Schroeder | Jul 1996 | A |
5539316 | Sukumar | Jul 1996 | A |
5565831 | Dorri | Oct 1996 | A |
5565834 | Hanley | Oct 1996 | A |
5635889 | Stelter | Jun 1997 | A |
5664569 | Damadian | Sep 1997 | A |
5759149 | Goldberg | Jun 1998 | A |
5760585 | Dorri | Jun 1998 | A |
5797833 | Kobayashi | Aug 1998 | A |
5800335 | Koch | Sep 1998 | A |
5817003 | Moll | Oct 1998 | A |
5840010 | Kobayashi | Nov 1998 | A |
5883558 | Laskaris | Mar 1999 | A |
5917324 | Leussler | Jun 1999 | A |
5943716 | Chu | Aug 1999 | A |
5959454 | Westphal | Sep 1999 | A |
5971913 | Newkirk | Oct 1999 | A |
6036634 | Goldberg | Mar 2000 | A |
6081120 | Shen | Jun 2000 | A |
6128522 | Acker | Oct 2000 | A |
6147578 | Panfil | Nov 2000 | A |
6155970 | Dykes | Dec 2000 | A |
6157278 | Katznelson | Dec 2000 | A |
6177795 | Zhu | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6191584 | Trequattrini | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6193285 | Proctor | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6208142 | Wagshul | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6228106 | Simbruner | May 2001 | B1 |
6231499 | Jones | May 2001 | B1 |
D446675 | Straub | Aug 2001 | S |
6278274 | Biglieri | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6317618 | Livni | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6323647 | Anderson | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6409654 | McClain | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6411187 | Rotem | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6433548 | Furuta | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6452388 | Reiderman | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6471634 | Dykes | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6502042 | Eid | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6511414 | Hamsund | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6535092 | Hurley | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6600401 | Zuk | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6611702 | Rohling | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6641521 | Kolarovic | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6646530 | Manfred | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6666816 | Mountain | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6687526 | Martin | Feb 2004 | B2 |
RE38453 | Lessard | Mar 2004 | E |
6707363 | Abele | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6751496 | Su | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6776527 | Tybinkowski | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6838964 | Knight | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6860272 | Carter | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6897750 | Neuberth | May 2005 | B2 |
6946939 | Doi | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6992486 | Srinivasan | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7034530 | Ahluwalia | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7071692 | Branch | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7116198 | Abele | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7148689 | Huang | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7148777 | Chell | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7205764 | Anderson | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7255671 | Boone | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7274192 | Havens | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7278962 | Lonneker-Lammers | Oct 2007 | B2 |
D567948 | Tierney | Apr 2008 | S |
7378848 | Gao | May 2008 | B2 |
7399220 | Kriesel | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7400147 | Rapoport | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7423431 | Amm | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7482558 | Koch | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7486982 | Branch | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7529575 | Rezzonico | May 2009 | B2 |
7551954 | Green | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7599728 | Feenan | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7614692 | Biaud | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7621815 | Bosserdet, Jr. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7719279 | Rapoport | May 2010 | B2 |
7760084 | Jensen | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7777491 | Gao | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7784121 | Ahlman | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7800368 | Vaughan | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7999541 | Chisholm | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8034007 | Avitable | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8087203 | Boesel | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8089281 | Zhai | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8118488 | Gregerson | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8147396 | Srinivasan | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8194866 | Smith | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8217653 | Vaughan | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8319496 | Eryaman | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8375295 | Zalewski | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8390288 | Graesslin | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8405479 | Cleveland | Mar 2013 | B1 |
8471558 | Chisholm | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8525116 | Schulz | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8555578 | Hushek | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8583294 | Villano | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8807084 | Rapoport | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8851018 | Rapoport | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8896310 | Rapoport | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8924848 | Klinger | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8924869 | Fellman | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8930831 | Bartomeli | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8969829 | Wollenweber | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8984426 | Endoh | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9003318 | Magnusson | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9055912 | Graumann | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9100111 | Behrendt | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9157975 | Dale | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9159479 | Rotem | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9400318 | Fautz | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9562956 | Rapoport | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9599683 | Armstrong | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9696269 | Fordham | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9974705 | Rapoport | May 2018 | B2 |
10012711 | Rapoport | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10018692 | Rapoport | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10076266 | Rapoport | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10078122 | Rapoport | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10094896 | Rapoport | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10132887 | Rapoport | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10191127 | Strauss | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10224134 | Nakatsu | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10224135 | Rapoport | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10383782 | Rapoport | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10426376 | Rapoport | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10499830 | Rapoport | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10524690 | Rapoport | Jan 2020 | B2 |
10548508 | Rapoport | Feb 2020 | B2 |
10568538 | Rapoport | Feb 2020 | B2 |
10750973 | Rapoport | Aug 2020 | B2 |
10847295 | Rapoport | Nov 2020 | B2 |
11278461 | Rapoport | Mar 2022 | B2 |
11287497 | Rapoport | Mar 2022 | B2 |
20010013779 | Marek | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010038489 | Nakamura | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010049465 | Goldberg | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020050895 | Zuk | May 2002 | A1 |
20020072648 | Dykes | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020123681 | Zuk | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020143233 | Donnelly | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020173696 | Kolarovic | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020173717 | Rohling | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030016518 | Arz | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030088175 | Branch | May 2003 | A1 |
20040030241 | Green | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040034273 | Boris | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040106844 | Lonneker-Lammers | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040116799 | Srinivasan | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040127786 | Schmit | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040133064 | Castillon Levano | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040135687 | Keene | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040147833 | Czipott | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040186341 | McDermott | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040194989 | Branch | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040196043 | Branch | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040236174 | Boone | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040236175 | Boone | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050004422 | Caspary | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050020906 | Seijger | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050027189 | Branch | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050030028 | Clarke | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050038314 | Falk | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050043612 | Saint-Jalmes | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050113668 | Srinivasan | May 2005 | A1 |
20050242817 | Hoult | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060022670 | Kumar | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060079730 | Getsla | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060084857 | Massengill | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060267585 | Havens | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070068862 | Sisemore | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070096737 | Rapoport | May 2007 | A1 |
20070108850 | Chertok | May 2007 | A1 |
20070135704 | Branch | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070203481 | Gregg | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070232894 | Feenan | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070238950 | Vija | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070249928 | Blezek | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070265520 | Posse | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070273378 | Trequattrini | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080001601 | Sellers | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080021317 | Sumanaweera | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080103388 | Maschke | May 2008 | A1 |
20080122441 | Hayakawa | May 2008 | A1 |
20080163425 | White | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080171931 | Maschke | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080204028 | Devries | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080234571 | Hay | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080246476 | Rapoport | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080259560 | Lvovsky | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080281187 | Massengill | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090044335 | Brewin | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090072939 | Shen | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090085700 | Lian | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090120615 | Icoz | May 2009 | A1 |
20090209846 | Bammer | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090213997 | Maschke | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090237077 | Vaughan | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090259560 | Bachenheimer | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100004502 | Honma | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100010599 | Chen | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100066368 | Gao | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100145358 | Maschke | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100154325 | Boesel | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100168502 | Delaporte | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100172468 | Gregerson | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100198047 | Zagorchev | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100219347 | Schulz | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100219833 | McGinley | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100236426 | Stewart | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100245543 | Greer | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100315085 | Brown | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110048424 | Radko | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110090033 | Sankar | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110113555 | Smith | May 2011 | A1 |
20110125010 | Vaquero Lopez | May 2011 | A1 |
20110160521 | Khodak | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110162652 | Rapoport | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110172487 | Khodak | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110173751 | Beaton | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110186049 | Rapoport | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110234347 | Rapoport | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110274238 | Maschke | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110280364 | Maschke | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110280380 | Maschke | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110282184 | Klingenbeck | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110304333 | Rapoport | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120071745 | Rapoport | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120073511 | Rapoport | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120077707 | Rapoport | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120078034 | Falk | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120119742 | Rapoport | May 2012 | A1 |
20120126814 | Fischer | May 2012 | A1 |
20120140899 | Bailey | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120247488 | Tonks | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130025062 | Esch | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130079624 | Rapoport | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130109956 | Rapoport | May 2013 | A1 |
20130150656 | Falk | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130204074 | Belval | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130204617 | Kuo | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130237803 | Rapoport | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130264465 | Dai | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130267765 | Rapoport | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130328559 | Rapoport | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130328560 | Rapoport | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130328563 | Rapoport | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130334439 | Etters | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140003614 | Levitov | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140050827 | Rapoport | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140051973 | Rapoport | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140051974 | Rapoport | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140051976 | Rapoport | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140055136 | Leussler | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140078301 | Fazzi | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140098934 | Kondo | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140099010 | Rapoport | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140103927 | Rapoport | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140117989 | Rapoport | May 2014 | A1 |
20140128725 | Rapoport | May 2014 | A1 |
20140139216 | Rapoport | May 2014 | A1 |
20140142914 | Rapoport | May 2014 | A1 |
20140152302 | Rapoport | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140152310 | Rapoport | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140155732 | Patz | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140158062 | Rapoport | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140230850 | Rapoport | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140257081 | Rapoport | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140266203 | Rapoport | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140300358 | Rapoport | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140354279 | Dumoulin | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140354282 | Kusik | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140357981 | Dumoulin | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140364722 | Dumoulin | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140378821 | Rapoport | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140378825 | Rapoport | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150005618 | Dumoulin | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150059157 | Rapoport | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150059655 | Rapoport | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150061670 | Fordham | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150061680 | Leskowitz | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150065788 | Rapoport | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150077105 | Rapoport | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150137812 | Rapoport | May 2015 | A1 |
20150141799 | Rapoport | May 2015 | A1 |
20150168519 | Rapoport | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150226817 | Pourrahimi | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150230766 | Wang | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150253397 | Rapoport | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150253400 | Rapoport | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150253401 | Rapoport | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20160022123 | Katznelson | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160030264 | Lehmann | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160032712 | Frosell | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160081582 | Rapoport | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160089054 | Rapoport | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20170143271 | Gustafsson | May 2017 | A1 |
20170146619 | Strauss | May 2017 | A1 |
20170181912 | Rapoport | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170188879 | Rapoport | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20180040406 | Rapoport | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180153435 | Rapoport | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180317805 | Rapoport | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180325416 | Rapoport | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20190170840 | Rapoport | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190172620 | Rapoport | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190328271 | Rabinovitz | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190328596 | Rapoport | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20210210268 | Rapoport | Jul 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
863080 | Feb 1971 | CA |
2815746 | May 2012 | CA |
2863080 | Aug 2013 | CA |
2448344 | Sep 2001 | CN |
101185383 | May 2008 | CN |
201846566 | May 2011 | CN |
102136337 | Jul 2011 | CN |
102551719 | Jul 2012 | CN |
103565437 | Feb 2014 | CN |
104207773 | Dec 2014 | CN |
104473643 | Apr 2015 | CN |
105358053 | Feb 2016 | CN |
19617739 | Jun 1997 | DE |
102008009673 | Aug 2009 | DE |
102008009674 | Aug 2009 | DE |
102011109375 | Feb 2013 | DE |
202013104656 | Oct 2013 | DE |
202013105211 | Dec 2013 | DE |
202014102343 | Jun 2014 | DE |
0187691 | Jul 1986 | EP |
0921527 | Jun 1999 | EP |
0921537 | Jun 1999 | EP |
1132072 | Sep 2001 | EP |
1619667 | Jan 2006 | EP |
2581071 | Apr 2013 | EP |
2607977 | Jun 2013 | EP |
363272 | Mar 1961 | GB |
226488 | Jul 2016 | IL |
S5961763 | Apr 1984 | JP |
861252613 | Nov 1986 | JP |
861280852 | Dec 1986 | JP |
862139304 | Jun 1987 | JP |
H04317630 | Nov 1992 | JP |
2004113455 | Apr 2004 | JP |
2004531313 | Oct 2004 | JP |
2005514078 | May 2005 | JP |
2007252741 | Oct 2007 | JP |
2010178857 | Aug 2010 | JP |
2016539683 | Dec 2016 | JP |
8910722 | Nov 1989 | WO |
9848756 | Nov 1998 | WO |
9921526 | May 1999 | WO |
03030801 | Apr 2003 | WO |
2004029644 | Apr 2004 | WO |
2005074608 | Aug 2005 | WO |
2007052275 | May 2007 | WO |
2008137003 | Nov 2008 | WO |
2010054457 | May 2010 | WO |
2010125559 | Nov 2010 | WO |
2011001429 | Jan 2011 | WO |
2011109761 | Sep 2011 | WO |
2012004797 | Jan 2012 | WO |
2012143825 | Oct 2012 | WO |
2013115847 | Aug 2013 | WO |
2014100106 | Jun 2014 | WO |
2014141251 | Sep 2014 | WO |
2014188424 | Nov 2014 | WO |
2014188426 | Nov 2014 | WO |
2018029666 | Feb 2018 | WO |
Entry |
---|
European Patent Office Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC issued in App. No. EP17838915, dated Apr. 21, 2023, 5 pages. |
Japanese Office Action (including English translation) issued in App. No. JP2022-036467, dated Mar. 22, 2023, 10 pages. |
“Inside the Preemie brain Incubator Enables MRI Scans on Preemies for Preventing Birth Asphyxia” http://www.sciencedaily.com/Videos/2005/1221-inside the oreemie brain.htm. See U.S. Appl. No. 13/808,476 for PDF. |
Advanced Healthcare Technology, “Baby Pod II: Infant Transport Device”, pp. 1-6, accessed online on May 26, 2016, 6 pages. |
Advanced Heathcare Technology, “Baby Pod II: Operating & Maintenance Manual”, revised Jan. 2011, pp. 1-14. |
American National Standard, Medical Electrical Equipment—Parts 2-19: Particular requirements for the basic safety and essential performance of infant incubators, Association for the advancement of medical instrumentation, ANSI/AAL EC 60601-2-19:2009, pp. 1-19. |
Antonucci, et al., The infant incubator in the neonatal intensive care unit: unresolved issues and future developments, J. Perinat. Med. 37(2009), 587-598. |
Aspect Imaging Ltd, “MRI- Incubator's Closure Assembly”, co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/539,442, filed Nov. 12, 2014. |
Aspect Imaging Ltd. “MRI RF Shielding Jacket”, co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/623,051, filed Feb. 16, 2015. |
Aspect Imaging Ltd. “MRI Thermo-Isolating Jacket”, co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/623,039, filed Feb. 16, 2015. |
Aspect Imaging Ltd., “A Method for Manipulating the MRI's Protocol of Pulse-Sequences”, co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/070,695, filed Nov. 4, 2013. |
Aspect Imaging Ltd., “A Method for Providing High Resolution, High Contrast Fused MRI Images”, co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/877,553, filed Apr. 3, 2013. |
Aspect Imaging Ltd., “Cage in an MRD with a Fastening/Attenuating System”, co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/527,950, filed Oct. 30, 2014. |
Aspect Imaging Ltd., “Capsule for a Pneumatic Sample Feedway”, co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/626,391, filed Feb. 19, 2015. |
Aspect Imaging Ltd., “Chamber for Housing Animals During Anaesthetic Procedures”, co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/537,266, filed Nov. 10, 2014. |
Aspect Imaging Ltd., CT/MRI Integrated System for the Diagnosis of Acute Strokes and Methods Thereof, copending U.S. Appl. No. 14/598,517, filed Jan. 16, 2015, 43 pages. |
Aspect Imaging Ltd., “Foamed Patient Transport Incubator”, co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/531,289, filed Nov. 3, 2014. |
Aspect Imaging Ltd., “Incubator Deployable Multi-Functional Panel”, co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/619,557, filed Feb. 11, 2015. |
Aspect Imaging Ltd., “Incubator's Canopy with Sensor Dependent Variably Transparent Walls and Methods for Dimming Lights Thereof”, co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/453,909, filed Aug. 7, 2014. |
Aspect Imaging Ltd., “Means and Method for Operating an MRI Device Within a RF-Magnetic Environment”, copending U.S. Appl. No. 14/596,329, filed Jan. 14, 2015. |
Aspect Imaging Ltd., “Means for Operating an MRI Device Within a RF-Magnetic Environment”, co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/596,320, filed Jan. 14, 2015. |
Aspect Imaging Ltd., “Mechanical Clutch for MRI”, co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/611,379, filed Feb. 2, 2015. |
Aspect Imaging Ltd., “MRI With Magnet Assembly Adapted for Convenient Scanning of Laboratory Animals With Automated RF Tuning Unit”, co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/581,266, filed Dec. 23, 2014. |
Aspect Imaging Ltd., “NMR Extractable Probe Cassette Means and Methods Thereof”, co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/504,907, filed Oct. 2, 2014. |
Aspect Imaging Ltd., RF Automated Tuning System Used in a Magnetic Resonance Device and Methods Thereof, co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/588,741, filed Jan. 2, 2015. |
Aspect Imaging Ltd., “Shutting Assembly for Closing an Entrance of an MRI Device”, co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/540,163 filed Nov. 13, 2014. |
Aspect Imaging Ltd., “System and Method for Generating Invasively Hyperpolarized Images”, co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/556,654, filed Dec. 1, 2014. |
Aspect Imaging Ltd., “System and Method for Generating Invasively Hyperpolarized Images”, co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/556,682, filed Dec. 1, 2014. |
Aspect Imaging Ltd., Temperature-Controlled Exchangeable NMR Probe Cassette and Methods Thereof, co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/504,890, filed Oct. 2, 2014. |
Aspect Imaging Ltd., “Method for Providing High Resolution, High Contrast Fused MRI Images”, co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/877,553, filed Apr. 3, 2013. |
Belov, A. et al. Passive Shimming of the Superconducting Magnet for MRI, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, Jun. 1995, vol. 5, No. 2, 679-681. |
Canadian Examiner Requisition for Application No. CA3,033,328, dated Jan. 31, 2020, 3 pages. |
Canadian Notice of Allowance issued in App. No. CA3,033,328, dated Dec. 1, 2021, 1 pages. |
Chinese Office Action (with English translation) for App. No. CN201780061265.4, dated Nov. 5, 2021, 7 pages. |
Chinese Office Action (with English language translation) for App. No. CN201780053274.9, dated Aug. 25, 2020, 24 pages. |
Chinese Office Action (with English translation) for App. No. CN201780061265.4, dated Apr. 16, 2021, 10 pages. |
Chinese Office Action (with English translation) for App. No. CN201780061265.4, dated Aug. 31, 2020, 17 pages. |
Decision to Grant a Patent for App. No. JP2019-506651, dated Jan. 27, 2022, 2 pages. |
Eberich et al., Functional MRI in neonates using neonatal head coil and MR compatible incubator, NeuroImage 20 (2003) 683-692. |
Extended European Search Report for App No. EP17845670.3, dated Apr. 28, 2020, 7 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP17838915.1, dated Mar. 23, 2020, 8 pages. |
Ferris et al., The design of neonatal incubators: a systems-oriented, human centered approach, J. Perinatology, 2013, 33, S24-S31. |
Glossary of MR Terms 4th edition; pp. 48-49 (Year: 1995) (5 pages). |
http://mriquestions.com/why-rf-shielding.hlml (Year: 2021) (2 pages). |
https://info.atlantisworldwide.com/blog/bid/348631/everything-you-need-lo-know-about-rf-shielding-for-mri#:-:text=Both%20copper%20and%20galvanized%20steel,your%20MRI%20and%20work%20well. (Year: 2016) (8 pages). |
https://info.blockimaging.com/bid/90630/rf-shielding-for-mri-scanners-two-types-compared (Year: 2012) (3 pages). |
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10790632/ (Year: 2000) (2 pages). |
https://www.cdc.gov/growthcharts/hlml_charts/lenageinf.him (Year: 2001) (3 pages). |
Incubator Enables MRI Scans on Preemies for Preventing Birth Asphyxia, Science Daily, http://web.archive.org/web/20130303154220/http://www.sciencedaily.com/videos/20/05/2011-inside the preemie brain.htm. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT Application No. PCT/IL2014/50450 dated May 8, 2015. 7 pages. |
International Search Report dated Jul. 27, 2012 in corresponding International Application No. PCT/IL2011/000537, 2 pages. |
International Search Report for Application No. EP17785567.3, dated Nov. 20, 2019, 7 pages. |
International Search Report for PCT Application No. PCT/IL2014/50451 dated Mar. 16, 2015. 2 pages. |
International Search Report from PCT/IL2014/050450, dated May 21, 2014, 35 pages. |
International Standard, CEI IEC 60601-1-8, Second Edition, Oct. 2006, Medical electrical equipment, Part 1-8:1-166 [abstract]. |
International Standard, CEI IEC 60601-1, Third Edition, Dec. 2005, Medical electrical equipment, Part 1, 1-393. |
Israeli Office Action (with English translation) for App. No. IL264729, dated Oct. 18, 2021, 9 pages. |
Japanese Notice of Allowance issued in App. No. JP2019-506651, dated Feb. 8, 2022, 2 pages. |
Japanese Office Action (with English translation) for Application No. JP2019-506651, dated Mar. 3, 2021, 8 pages. |
Japanese Office Action for Application No. JP2019-506651, dated Mar. 3, 2020, 8 pages. |
Jenkins, S., ScanPod, Baby Pod-Products-Scan Pod, 2002-2011 Advance Healthcare Technology, ltd., internet website http://babypod.com:80/products/scanpod.php, 1 page. |
Keith Wachowicz, “Evaluation of Active and Passive Shimming in Magnetic Resonance Imaging”, Research and Reports in Nuclear Medicine. 1-12, 2014. |
Kim et al., Air transparent soundproof window, AIP Advances 4, 117123 (2014), published online, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1069/1.4902155, 4 pages. |
Kitterman et al., Catheterization of umbilical vessels in newborn infants, Pediatric Clinics of North America, vol. 17, No. 4, Nov. 1970, 895-912. |
Knutson, Allysa Jennie, Acceptable noise levels for neonates in the neonatal intensive care unit, a Capstone Project submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of: Doctor of Audiology, Washington University School of Medicine Program in Audiology and Communication Sciences, May 17, 2013, pp. 1-59. |
Liming Hong and Donglin Zu, Shimming Permanent Magnet of MRI Scanner, Piers Online, 2007, vol. 3, No. 6, 859-864. |
Liu, Lichuan et al., Development and Applications of Active Noise Control System for Infant Incubators, Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics San Antonio, TX, USA—Oct. 2009, pp. 1-6. |
Mahil et al., Hybrid Swarm Algorithm for the Suppression of Incubator Interference in Premature Infants ECG, Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology 6(16): 2931-2935, 2013. |
Marik et al., Neonatal incubators: A toxic sound environment for the preterm infant?, Pediatr Crit Care Med 2012 vol. 13, No. 6, pp. 1-6. |
McGinley et al., A permanent MRI magnet for magic angle imaging having its field parallel to the poles, Journal of Magnetic Resonance, 2016, 271; 60-67. |
Notice of Allowability dated Jul. 8, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/040,214 (pp. 1-2). |
Notice of Allowability dated May 7, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/040,214 (pp. 1-2). |
Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 6, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/324,218 (pp. 1-8). |
Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 25, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/040,214 (pp. 1-5). |
Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 15, 2021 for US App. No. 15/688,124 (pp. 1-5). |
Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 22, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/324,218 (pp. 1-8). |
Office Action (Notice of Allowance and Fees Due (PTOL-85)) dated Feb. 18, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/324,218 (pp. 1-3). |
Office Action dated Apr. 20, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/688,124 (pp. 1-15). |
Office Action dated Aug. 31, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/103,505 (pp. 1-13). |
Office Action dated Jan. 15, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/040,214 (6 pages). |
Office Action dated Jan. 25, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/095,612 (pp. 1-6). |
Office Action dated Mar. 19, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/688,124 (pp. 1-6). |
Office Action dated Mar. 4, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/253,584 (pp. 1-12). |
Office Action dated Sep. 29, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/688,124 (pp. 1-17). |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/892,209 dated Sep. 28, 2016. 22 pages. |
Paley et al., An MR-compatible neonatal incubator, The British Journal of Radiology, 85, 2012, 952-958. |
R Prost and L F Czervionke, How does an MR scanner operate? American Journal of Neuroradiology, Aug. 1994, 15 (7) 1383-1386. |
Ranganna et al., Reducing noise on the neonatal unit, Infant, 2011, vol. 7, Issue 1, pp. 25-28. |
Rapoport, Uri, “RF Shielding Conduit in an MRI Closure Assembly”, co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/574,785, filed Dec. 18, 2014. |
Rapoport; U.S. App. No. 61/1905,221; filed Nov. 17, 2013; titled: MRI-Incubator's Closure Assembly. (50 pages). |
Rapoport; U.S. Appl. No. 61/899,233; filed Nov. 3, 2013; titled: A Patient Transport Incubator. (54 pages). |
Rapoport; U.S. Appl. No. 61/940,514; filed Feb. 17, 2014; titled: An Incubator Deployable Multi-Functional Panel. (100 pages). |
SASO IEC 60601-1-10, Medical electrical equipment, Part 1-10: General requirements for basic safety and essential performance, Collateral Standard: Requirements for the development of physiologic closed-loop controllers, 2008, 1-36. |
Science Daily, Inside the preemie brain, Incubator enables MRI scans on premeeies for preventing birth asphyxia, Dec. 1, 2005, pp. 1-2, Web address: http://web.archive.org/web/20130303154220/http://www.sciencedaily.com/videos/2005/1211-inside_the_preemie_brain.htm. |
Science Museum, “Fast Forward: 20 ways F1 is changing our world-Baby Pod II”, uploaded Apr. 7, 2009, accessed online on May 26, 2016 at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KyZVhPWbWqo, 1 page. |
T. Miyamoto, H. Sakurai, H. Takabayashi, M. Aoki, “Development of a Permanent Magnet Assembly for MRI”, Journal of the Magnetics Society of Japan, 1989, vol. 13, Issue 2, p. 465-468. |
Thermaxx Jackets, 5 Most Common Thermal Insulation Materials by Thermaxx Jackets, Jun. 28, 2011, pp. 1-3. |
Tsuno et al., “Magnetic shield for stabilizing air gap fields between pole pieces of permanent magnets”, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, Oct. 1975, vol. 14, No. 10, p. 1511-1517. |
Yingying Yao, Yong-Kwon Choi and Chang-Seop Koh, The Optimal Design of Passive Shimming Elements for High Homogenous Permanent Magnets Utilizing Sensitivity Analysis, Journal of Electrical Engineering & Technology, 2006, vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 461-465. |
Z. Ren et al. “Study on Shimming Method for Open Permanent Magnet of MRI”, Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, vol. 6, 23-34, 2009. |
Canadian Office Action issued in App. No. CA3,154,755, dated Sep. 1, 2023, 4 pages. |
Canadian Office Action issued in CA3034990, dated Nov. 10, 2023, 5 pages. |
Chinese Notice of Reexamination for App. No. CN201780061265.4, dated Sep. 11, 2023, 12 pages. |
English translation of Chinese Notice of Reexamination issued in App. No. CN201780061265.4, dated Nov. 9, 2023, 10 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220291312 A1 | Sep 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62381079 | Aug 2016 | US | |
62372065 | Aug 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16324218 | US | |
Child | 17707375 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15402438 | Jan 2017 | US |
Child | 16324218 | US |