Patent Application
20100119062
This invention relates generally to the generation of a unique identifying number from a system's properties, which may be employed for a variety of purposes such as system identification and generation of encryption keys.
A system is a functionality related assembly of parts. This invention relates to a man made system. Such an assembly may include both organic and inorganic subassemblies and subsystems. Currently, most man made systems are assembled almost entirely from man made parts, such as electronic components; optical components; mechanical parts and or similar. Most of the behavioural complexity relating to today's systems is contained within integrated circuit assemblies, especially but not exclusively in the form of programmable circuits, such as microprocessors or state machines.
In some applications it is desirable to identify uniquely a system in order to distinguish it from other similar systems. One method of identifying biological systems, like humans, is to create a numeric value based on the system's uniquely distinguishing features (biometrics) such as a fingerprint or iris pattern. It is desirable to have a comparable form of identification for synthetic systems, (machines) and is known as an ICmetric. Like biometrics, ICmetrics can be derived from properties that change with time but have a core underlying feature which is deterministic and can be reliably extracted. Such properties are useful for identification purposes including signatures and other security applications like passports.
Although system properties can be stable, properties can also be unstable, non-deterministic and have no extractable core underlying feature. By deriving a unique value/key from a highly dynamic property, the key can be changed frequently, providing a high degree of confidence that a system or its communications have not been compromised by another, possibly malicious entity. A value derived in this way is ideal for security applications such as key generation for an asymmetric encryption system.
A conventional approach to generating unique values in a machine is a random number generating algorithm which may be realised as software or a hardware circuit. The problem with algorithms is that they are inherently deterministic unless based on samples of real world non-deterministic properties. A value derived from carefully chosen system properties can be naturally non-deterministic. The execution path through a program is changed greatly by the applied data as is the sequence of values that pass over the buses. This is further enhanced in high-performance computer architectures that incorporate circuits with pipelines and caches, which have highly non-deterministic effects. Even a small change on a position sensor can have an apparently chaotic impact on certain derived values.
Well designed integrated circuits normally include infrastructure circuits designed to help the developer debug and improve the system. Debug infrastructure can include monitoring circuitry such as; event detection trigger circuits, trace circuits and profiling circuitry which observe critical connections within circuits. Event detection circuits produce a stimulus for use by other circuits upon a signal meeting preset conditions. Trace circuits create a log that records the transitions of a chosen signal such as the data and address buses. Profiling circuitry contains counters that can record how many iterations of an action or event have occurred.
According to the invention, there is provided a device for generating a machine-specific identification key, the device comprising:
monitoring circuitry to monitor transmitted signals within one or more machine circuits and generate signal information based on said monitored signals;
a register in which the generated signal information is stored;
manipulation means to convert generated signal information into an identification key.
In this arrangement, monitoring circuitry is used to observe one or several signals that are known to change frequently. In some cases the monitoring circuitry will count events like the assertion of a signal, particularly but not limited to an instruction cache hit signal or data cache hit signal. In other cases the monitoring circuitry observes a signal and uses its value to modify a register. A non-exhaustive list of signals that could be monitored include: data address bus, data value bus, data control bus, instruction address, system timer, signals relating to a memory management unit, signals relating to a communication interface or any peripheral.
In the case where signals are used to modify a register, it can be via: simple combinational logic like a bitwise exclusive-or; a more complicated operation such as an arithmetic operation; a conventional pseudo random number generator; another implementation specific operation. The counters and registers can then be read via the memory map by a privileged part of the system such as, an operating system, security circuits, security routines or debug monitor routines. Alternatively the signals and or counter values are combined by a circuit to create a single value as required by the application.
Although it is practical to create dedicated monitoring circuitry to detect and extract system properties for use as a random number or unique identifier, there is already monitoring circuitry in most integrated circuits in the form of debug support circuitry. This existing debug circuitry may observe some or all of the chosen signals, especially the buses and cache performance signals like a hit signal. Therefore, combining all the monitoring circuitry together saves significant resources as no monitoring circuitry is replicated. System security is not compromised, because all monitoring circuits are only accessible by privileged parts of the system. In some cases it may be preferable to disable monitoring when certain locations in the memory map are accessed, such as the registers associated with the monitoring circuitry and security circuits. Disablement of the monitoring circuitry is controlled by dedicated event detection circuitry which may have one or several regions of operation. The detection circuitry may disable monitoring of one or more signals depending on the matched region and configuration.
The invention also provides a system for generating a single value from the observed values, comprising:
Specific embodiments of the invention will now be described by way of example with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:-
An aspect of the invention provides an integrated circuit assembly with monitoring circuitry comprising: event counters for counting events; condition detection circuitry for detecting and generating event signals; manipulation circuitry to convert information from monitored signals; registers for storing monitored signals and manipulated signals.
This invention relates generally to the generation of a unique identifying number from a system's properties, which may be employed for a variety of purposes such as system identification and generation of encryption keys.
Referring to the drawings, the monitoring circuitry (100) is part of an integrated circuit assembly (101) which includes the conventional parts of a microcontroller and or system on chip. For general explanatory purposes the assembly is simplified to a processor core (102) which is not restricted to a digital design, plus a selection of optional parts such as: instruction cache (103); data cache (104); instruction memory (105); data memory (106); instruction bus assembly (107); data bus assembly (108); peripherals (109); external communication paths (110) which connect to external communication circuitry (111); external signals (112) that connect to other external circuits like sensors (113); Internal signals (114) that interconnect the various sub-components within integrated circuit assembly (101). Specific examples of signals include an instruction cache hit signal (115) and a data cache hit signal (116) which provide status events to the monitoring circuitry (100).
A first embodiment has monitoring circuitry as shown in
In the case where the desired outcome is a random number the manipulation circuitry (201) performs a bitwise exclusive-or, or other hash function value merging operation of the monitored signal and the contents of its associated register (202), such as the result is then stored back in the same register (202). In other cases such as when creating an identifier or encryption key the manipulation circuits may characterise the observed signals to create approximations to the statistical distributions of their values. One approach to characterisation is to record the occurrences of values within specific ranges, which can optionally be adjusted at run-time by manual experimentation or automatically using a calibration circuit. Other signals of specific monitoring interest are: the data address part of the data bus assembly; the instruction address part of the instruction bus assembly, an instruction hit signal (115) from the instruction cache (103) or a data hit signal (116) from the data cache (104).
The occurrences of values may be logged using one or several counters (200), whose value(s) may be selectively logged in either register (202) or a memory when one of the counters overflows. These logged values are used to determine the historical signal value distributions used by online profiling circuits within the manipulation circuitry (201). The invention allows similar status signals connected to other circuits. A further option allows the circuitry (100, 200, 201, 202) to be disabled to conserve power within the overall integrated circuit assembly (101). A second embodiment is an extension of the first embodiment as shown in
A third embodiment shown in
Optionally the key generation circuitry (401) periodically generates new keys based on the value of a system timer (403); alternatively it can be requested to generate a new key by another part of the system.
A fourth embodiment utilises the historical signal values and their distributions gathered by the online profiling circuits contained within the manipulation circuitry (201) to determine if the system's properties and or features have changed due to unauthorised tampering or failure of one or more parts of the system. In the case of severe changes due to tampering or a failure within the system, the monitored signals will be outside their normal ranges, thus causing the properties and features to deviate significantly. Therefore it is made possible to identify that tampering or failure has occurred. By analyzing the application specific set of monitored signals and the changes it is also possible to identify between failure and potentially malicious tampering.
A fifth embodiment includes a combination of the extensions made to the first embodiment by the second and third embodiments.
The code generation process uses an algorithm which includes statistical data about the general population of circuits to be analysed, and this is obtained in a calibration stage (carried out once) before the circuit data is analysed in the subsequent data analysis stage. [w1 ]
Prior to operation, a decision is made as to the task on which the system will operate and the precise feature set, in the form of circuit features, to be used for the chosen modality. This phase will need to be repeated for each modality, feature set and for each configuration of the monitoring circuitry to be employed. The latter condition is due to configuration specific properties which may influence system operation.
When obtaining the circuit samples to calibrate the system, the precise number of samples for each circuit is dependent on the modality under consideration due to differences in their stability although the more samples, the better the resulting system performance.
The sample obtained in the calibration phase are used to determine the time-stability of the data obtained. Time-stability is judged according to specified criteria included in the circuitry. Stability can be assessed on the entire bit sequence of the signal. Alternatively, a portion of the bit sequence may be tested and subsequently processed. For example, higher order buts of a signal may be used where such bits change less over time (for example a counter).
The measured values require normalisation which involves generating mapping vectors, as described further below, and the de-correlation operation is also detailed below in the description of the data analysis stage.
The features employed in an analysis system may take on a diverse range of forms depending of the nature of the circuits to be analysed. The values and value ranges of features are hence primarily governed by the characteristics of the features themselves and therefore, necessarily, the absolute value of features alone possesses little semantic value when considered in relation to other features (the value “3” in absolute terms, possesses little meaning as two features with the value “3” may not in any way be considered equal).
Since the underlying purpose is to combine feature values to form a single code, it is necessary to normalise feature values onto a given linear scale in order that their absolute value has some comparable meaning. The effect of this process will be to render each feature as equally significant. A significant property of the system of the invention is that weighting (in the sense of allocation of importance to feature values) is handled implicitly within the feature combination phase of the algorithm as will be apparent below.
A further significant property of the invention is its ability to handle features which may occur in multi-modal clusters where the component values for a given circuit may occur within given subsets of the given feature range. Two distinct subgroups of feature values may be identified, features where the component values are independent of any circuit and features where the values associated with a given circuit, form clusters of values which are numerically close to each other. In order to encapsulate all the possibilities, the actual normalization process defines a mapping from the actual measured values for each feature onto an alternative scale which clusters all values associated with a given circuit together. The alternative techniques for achieving this are outlined below.
The algorithm for dealing with this situation operates as follows:-
A remaining problem relates to values within the feature domain which are not found within the sample set used for deriving the normalisation maps. These are associated with the nearest defined value and mapped as is a member value for the given circuit. This may not be correct however and the only way to minimise error in such cases is to employ as large a training set as is possible.
The solution proposed for features possessing multi-modal distributions is to bring together the component modal values for each feature to a common base. The algorithm is as follows:-
For efficient employment of the system, the operation of the sample calibration circuits should be typical of, although significantly not identical to, the operation of the circuits on which the system is to be employed.
For each measured feature, the normalisation phase gives rise to a mapping from the measured values onto an alternative scale. This mapping is made available to the subsequent data analysis phase which represents the operational mode of the system.
For an unknown circuit, the monitoring circuitry is employed to derive the feature values for code generation as described above. The normalization mappings derived during the calibration phase are subsequently employed to map these measured values onto new values employed in the feature combination phase.
The goal of the feature combination phase is to generate circuit specific identifying numbers (termed basis numbers) with low intra-sample variance (that is, the values produced for the same circuit) but high inter-sample variance, (that is, the values produced for different circuits) with the ideal case being no inter-sample overlap of potential basis numbers.
The effectiveness of the combination strategy depends on the stability of the basis numbers generated. To achieve stability in the basis numbers, stable bits are chosen from the monitored signals in the calibration phase. Due to the fact that, for any given circuit, a subset of the features the basis numbers generated will deviate from their ideal values, the following properties will be typically observed for a simple addition of the values:-
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0615382.8 | Aug 2006 | GB | national |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/GB07/02916 | 8/2/2007 | WO | 00 | 11/20/2009 |
