The present invention relates to the general art of cardiac surgery, and to the particular field of heart retractors used in cardiac surgery.
There are as many as 300,00 coronary bypass graft procedures performed annually in the United States. Each of those procedures may include one or more graft vessels. Currently, each graft vessel must be hand sutured. As many as four or more grafts are placed in a procedure. Until recently, coronary artery bypass procedures have been performed with the patient on cardiopulmonary bypass whereby the heart is stopped with cardioplegia and the surgery performed on an exposed and still heart.
Some pioneering surgeons are performing procedures in which the coronary bypass is performed on a beating heart. That is, without heart-lung bypass and cardioplegia. This minimizes the time it takes to perform the procedure and reduces the cost of the operation by eliminating the heart-lung bypass machine.
Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) is performed and a new blood supply to the heart muscle is established when coronary arteries are blocked with calcium or plaque. A new blood supply conduit is joined to the diseased coronary, distal to the blockage, thus providing a fresh supply of oxygenated blood to the vessel in question. Today, this is accomplished by hand suturing a graft vessel (the new supply of blood) to the diseased vessel. This junction is called an anastomosis of vessels. Many different types of supply conduits can be used. Examples are cadaver vein, saphenous vein, radial artery, internal mammary artery, and the like.
By way of background, the basic operation of a heart will be briefly discussed. The heart works like a pump. The left and right ventricles are separate but share a common wall (the septum). The left ventricle is thicker and pumps the blood into the systemic circulation. The work it performs is much greater than the right ventricle. The right ventricle pumps blood into the pulmonary circulation, which is a low pressure circuit. The left ventricle wall (a low energy system) is much thinner than the right ventricle.
The left ventricle fills in diastole and ejects in systole. The difference between the diastolic volume (largest) and the systolic volume (smallest) (the stroke volume or amount of blood ejected on each heartbeat) multiplied by heart rate determines the cardiac output of the heart (liters/min. of flow). The heart shortens during systole as the muscle contracts. There are a number of motions during contraction (including a considerable amount of rotation) but for practical purposes the heart can be thought of as a truncated cone. Shortening occurs along its length and also along its diameter. For purposes of this disclosure, the more important of the two motions is the shortening along the diameter since the ejection volume varies as the square vs. along the length which varies with the first power.
The heart functions well whether the person is upright, upside down, prone or supine. It sits inside the pericardium—a sac which limits its motion and spreads the support on the heart so that no matter how a person positions himself, it is not particularly compressed and is able to fill and then eject with each heartbeat. The concept of the pericardium spreading the load is critical, i.e., when lying supine, the posterior pericardium supports the heart over a large surface of the heart just as when the person is lying on his stomach, the front of the pericardium spreads the load.
When the chest is opened by a median sternotomy it is possible to gain access to all chambers and surfaces of the heart. This combined with the fact that this incision is usually less painful than a thoracotomy (rib separation), makes this the preferred surgical approach to the heart.
The coronary vessels are surface vessels, only occasionally dipping into the myocardium making them accessible without opening the heart. Traditionally, bypass surgery is done with the heart arrested. This stops the motion of the heart and allows the arrest of the coronary circulation so that surgeon sews in a bloodless and easy to see field. Since the heart is stopped, the patient would suffer irreversible damage to the brain and other tissues and organs without the use of the heart-lung machine to support the general circulation. Although the heart-lung machine has been refined, it is particularly toxic to older and debilitated patients and it is expensive.
It is possible to perform surgery off bypass, while the heart is beating and the coronaries are under positive blood pressure; however, there may be problems. One problem is that not all vessels are accessible since some vessels are on the posterior or inferior surfaces and that when such vessels are brought into view by lifting the heart, cardiac performance is impaired such that the cardiac output falls and blood pressure drops. A second problem is that the heart moves so that suturing in vessels (12 to 15 stitches in a vessel under 2 mm in diameter) might be inaccurate and a third problem is that there is blood in the field as the coronary circulation is not interrupted. This last problem is now largely solved by snares, which temporarily stop the flow of blood through the targeted arteries. The problem of lifting the heart is not to impair the performance of the heart while at the same time adequately exposing the heart and regionally immobilizing the vessel during beating heart surgery, and this problem is not solved with any prior art system.
Therefore there is a significant need for a means and a method for lifting a heart so as not to impair the performance of the heart while at the same time adequately exposing the heart and regionally immobilizing a vessel during beating heart surgery.
Lifting of the heart is deleterious to heart function for several reasons. First, the lifting of the heart impairs the venous return to the heart so that there is less diastolic filling of the heart (this can largely be corrected by putting the head down and the feet up to increase venous return). Second, the heart is distorted. Using a hand or spatula to lift the heart is quite different then simply changing body position when the heart is inside the chest. The force of the hand on the heart is localized so that the heart is no longer a truncated cone, but is much flatter. This shape is much less effective for ejection (the circle is the most effective as it has the highest ratio of volume to diameter) and flattening also limits the diastolic volume so that inadequate filling occurs.
In order to perform cardiac surgery on a beating heart, there is a need to lift, support and orient the heart without reducing its ability to function. The inventors have discovered that the secret is to work like the pericardium does when a person changes body position and do everything possible to keep the heart's shape consistent.
In coronary bypass operations, grafts have to be anastomosed to the anterior descending artery (right coronary artery branch), the circumflex artery, and to the posterior descending artery. The anterior descending artery lies on the front surface of the heart and is easily accessible to the surgeon without particular help from surgical assistants or using any devices. The circumflex and posterior descending arteries, however, lie on the back surface of the heart. Therefore, to expose the circumflex artery to a field of view of the surgeon, it is mandatory to lift the heart and rotate it about the axis of the inferior vena cava and the superior vena cava. Likewise, to expose the posterior descending artery, it is necessary to lift the heart and rotate it in the direction of its apex. If the heart is moved improperly, it may go into fibrillation.
Ordinarily, a surgical assistant is employed to lift the heart by using his or her hand, this is satisfactory for an arrested heart. However this is not satisfactory for a beating heart. However, it is very difficult and tiring to keep the heart in a steady position. Furthermore, the myocardium in contact with the assistant's fingers may be damaged by pressure, avulsion, and premature rewarming. Further, the assistant's hand in the operative field can get in the way, and the assistant, who often stands next to the surgeon may restrict the surgeon's movements.
Therefore, there is a need for a heart retractor which will support the heart in position for coronary bypass surgery of the circumflex coronary artery and posterior descending artery.
Another prior art method of supporting a heart is by use of a sling. A sling is a network of fabric or plastic that is placed around the heart in the manner of a hammock. The heart is then supported by the sling. It is noted that in order for a sling to work as a retractor, the surgeon is required to arrange the ties to be pulled from the proper direction, such as normal to the desired direction of lift, which can be onerous. This presents a serious problem since there are no easy reference points above the patient in which to attach these ties.
While the art has included several inventions intended to support the heart during coronary bypass surgery of the circumflex coronary artery, these inventions have several drawbacks that have hindered their acceptance in the art. For example, the use of nets to support the heart exposes the heart to fine strands which impinge on the heart and may cause damage. Furthermore, nets may impede the surgical target and require special techniques or procedures to remove the net from the surgical target area. This is especially onerous if the net mesh is fine. Flat cloth tapes are a form of net, and may damage the heart due to a rough texture of the cloth and the small area of contact between the tape strands and the heart. Further, tapes and similar devices that do not have large surface areas contacting the heart may not support the heart in a uniform manner and may create large pressure areas at the contact points.
Therefore, there is a need for a heart retractor which will support the heart in position for coronary bypass surgery of the circumflex coronary artery in a manner that will not damage the heart yet will provide easy access to the surgical target and will keep working while cardiac output is maintained.
A further consideration in coronary artery surgery is hemorrhage from the incision into the coronary artery at the proposed anastomotic site. Therefore, heretofore, coronary artery surgery has been carried out under conditions of cardiac arrest and aortic root cross clamping. Hence, the myocardium is temporarily deprived of coronary blood supply. In some patients, an additional coronary blood supply, through the form of bronchial circulation, causes significant hemorrhage during the bypass grafting process. This hemorrhage is inconvenient, as it masks the surgeon's view during the delicate suturing process, and threatens the well-being of the patient. Performing surgery in this manner has several additional drawbacks, including the need to stop the heart, the need to insert special equipment and procedural steps to carry out the function of moving blood through the patient's body while the heart is stopped.
Therefore, there is a need for a heart retractor which will support the heart in position for coronary bypass surgery of all of the coronary arteries, including the circumflex coronary artery, in a manner such that the tool does not damage the heart while cardiac output is maintained yet will provide easy access to the surgical target and which can be used in a manner that does not require the heart to be stopped.
Still further, there is a need for a heart retractor which permits regional as well as specific immobilization of the heart.
However, the continued operation of the heart will produce problems, in addition to the above-discussed problems, of forming a moving target for the surgeon. That is, since the heart continues to beat during the operation, the surgical target will move in connection with such beating movement. The heart cannot be stopped or unduly constrained without increasing the danger of fibrillation.
Therefore, there is a need for a heart retractor which will support a beating heart in position for coronary bypass surgery of coronary arteries in a manner that will not damage the heart yet will provide specific and regional support while allowing unabated cardiac output.
Recently, there has been interest in minimally invasive coronary bypass surgery. This is not surprising since a median sternotomy and a run on the cardiopulmonary bypass pump are not well tolerated by some patients, combined with the added cost of coronary bypass equipment and staff. The procedure results in considerable recovery time and is associated with a risk of death and major complication. While the ultimate goal is to provide bypass to all vessels by port access (like gallbladder surgery) and to eliminate the need for cardiopulmonary bypass, a more limited but reasonable option for the next number or years will be to perform bypass off pump with an incision (sternotomy or thoracotomy). A tool which could allow performance of multivessel off pump bypass would be most helpful.
Therefore, there is a need for a heart retractor which will support the heart in position for minimally invasive coronary bypass surgery of coronary arteries, including the circumflex coronary artery, in a manner that will not damage the heart yet will provide easy access to the surgical target without requiring the heart to be stopped yet without unduly constraining the heart.
Still further, the inventors have observed that not all hearts are the same size, shape and have the same spacing between correspoding areas. Thus, while all hearts are basically the same, there may be a variation between individual hearts. Therefore, a device that supports a heart should account for these variations. This is especially true if the heart is to continue pumping during the operation and while it is supported. If the support is not fit to the particular heart, it may constrict the heart in some manner and thus interfere with the continued output of the heart.
Therefore, there is a need for a heart retractor which will support a heart, especially a beating heart, during coronary surgery and which can be adjusted to fit the particular needs of the individual heart and will support the heart both in gross and regionally.
It is a main object of the present invention to provide a heart retractor which will support the weight of a beating heart and maintain cardiac output unabated and uninterrupted even though the heart is maintained in an unnatural position and/or orientation.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide a heart retractor which will support a beating heart in position for coronary bypass surgery and which supports the heart both regionally and in gross.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide a heart retractor which will support a beating heart in position for coronary bypass surgery and which supports the heart both regionally and in gross and which can account for variations in individual hearts.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide a heart retractor which will support a beating heart in position for coronary bypass surgery of the coronary arteries, including the circumflex coronary artery.
It is another object of the present invention to provide a heart retractor which will support the heart in position for coronary bypass surgery of the coronary arteries in a manner that will not damage the heart yet will provide easy access to the surgical target.
It is another object of the present invention to provide a heart retractor which will support the heart in position for coronary bypass surgery in a manner that will not damage the heart yet will provide easy access to the surgical target and which can be used in a manner that does not require the heart to be stopped.
It is another object of the present invention to provide a heart retractor which will support the heart in position for coronary bypass surgery in a manner that will not damage the heart yet will provide easy access to the surgical target without requiring the heart to be stopped yet without unduly constraining the heart.
It is another object of the present invention to provide a heart retractor which will support the heart in position for minimally invasive coronary bypass surgery in a manner that will not damage the heart yet will provide easy access to the surgical target without requiring the heart to be stopped yet without unduly constraining the heart.
It is another object of the present invention to provide a heart retractor which will provide regional and specific immobilization of the heart.
It is another object of the present invention to provide a heart retractor which will isolate one region of the heart while allowing cardiac output to be sustained.
These, and other, objects are achieved by a heart retractor which links lifting of the heart and regional immobilization which stops one location of the heart from moving while permitting the remainder of the heart to move in a normal manner. This provides a stationary target for the surgeon while supporting the heart in a safe manner and in a manner that does not interfere with the surgeon or his field of sight. In this manner, the retractor can be used to support a heart during cardiac coronary surgery without requiring an assistant to hold the heart, yet will permit the surgical procedure to be carried out without requiring cardiac arrest.
More specifically, a first form of the heart retractor includes an element that can be cup-shaped and that engages the apex portion of the heart being supported, as well as a plurality of support arms each fixed at one end thereof to chosen locations on the heart. Since all hearts are not identical and all paricardial spaces are not identical, some means must be provided to accommodate such variations between individual hearts. Therefore another form of the invention includes long, thin malleable heart supporting members which support the gross weight of the heart to hold it in the desired orientation, and fine immobilizing elements which gently support the heart without interfering with cardiac output. The gross weight support is provided by a clamp-like element that can be sized to accommodate an individual heart, and the other elements can be moved to account for the spacings and sizes for the particular heart being supported. In this manner, a heart, especially a beating heart, can be supported in the manner that is most effective for that particular heart. Thus, in the case of a beating heart, cardiac output can be maintained in an unabated and uninterrupted manner as there will be virtually no constrictions on the heart because the support will be perfectly fitted to that particular heart.
A surgery target immobilizing element is fixed at one end thereof to a stationary element and has a heart-engaging element on the other end thereof. The heart-engaging element includes means for engaging the heart adjacent to the surgical target while leaving the target area exposed. A main support arm is fixed at one end thereof to a stationary element and to the cup-shaped element at the other end thereof. A vacuum can be applied to the cup-shaped element via the main support arm, and to heart-engaging elements on the ends of the support arms.
An alternative form of the retractor can be used in minimally invasive surgery. The alternative form includes a handle having a cup-shaped heart-engaging element on a distal end and a hand-grip on a proximal end thereof. The proximal end is located outside the patient during surgery. The alternative form also includes a cup-shaped element and a plurality of support arms, both rigid and flexible.
While this invention is disclosed in the preferred form for open chest procedures for beating heart surgery, it may also be utilized for minimally invasive procedures as well as those that use cardioplegia due to its novel time saving and enabling features. It is also noted that this disclosure is not directed to the art of anastomosis per se. However, it is directly related to enabling a surgeon to perform an anastomotic procedure in a precise and controlled manner.
The inventive device disclosed herein eliminates the need for use of the heart-lung machine. It allows a surgeon to lift and displace the heart to expose all vessels to regionally immobilize them for suturing without seriously impairing heart performance. Small support arms are attached around the heart so that even as the heart is lifted its shape is preserved. Since forces must be exerted to lift the heart, preference is made to lifting in such a way that the short axis (circular aspect) is maintained and allowed to shorten. The long axis can be used for more weight bearing since this will have relatively less effect on the performance of the heart.
Practically speaking, this means that the heart is attached at its apex (end of the long axis) and small support arms attach around the circumference of the heart. The support arms attach around the circumference of the heart. The support arms lift the heart and spread the support between the long and short axes of the heart. They are able to keep the heart in a circular shape and preserve its ability to contract. They can attach to at least one point on the circumference of the heart and/or at the apex and still lift and preserve the shape. The support arms on one side, most likely the bottom that gravity dictates, will be rigid support arms while the top support arms are flexible. This allows the circumference to be unrestricted so that there is virtually no impediment to shortening in the short axis. A pair of rigid support arms could attach around the circumference on each side of a target vessel to regionally immobilize that area for suturing. A separate stabilizer could be attached to the main support structure or come from a separate retractor base or come from the chest wall to stop movement at the surgical target area. The retractor of the present invention simulates pericardium support of the heart.
Once the stabilization of the beating heart has been achieved as with the retractor system of the present invention, it then becomes more feasible to entertain the idea of performing this surgery in a minimally invasive manner precluding the need for the median sternotomy.
In
Cardiac contraction is orchestrated by electrical impulses originating from the heart's nervous system. Electrical stimulation to the myocardial fibers results in muscular contraction. Specifically timed electrical signals originating in the upper chambers of the heart cause the atriae to contract and empty blood into the ventricles 16 and 30. After atrial contraction, a short electrical delay takes place. This pause allows the ventricles 16 and 30 to receive blood from atriae before they are stimulated to contract. With ventricular contraction, blood is ejected from heart 10.
In
By comparing the figures, it can be seen that the overall length of the heart, as illustrated by dimension L, changes little throughout the process. Therefore, if the heart is clamped in a manner that restricts the length-dimension while permitting the other dimensions to change, the operation of the heart will not be inhibited. It is this feature that the inventors have taken advantage of to develop a heart retractor that can be used on a beating heart. By immobilizing the heart in a direction along dimension L, but allowing the remainder of the heart to operate in a normal manner, operation of the heart is not restricted. The retractor of the present invention further immobilizes only the specific surgery target area whereby the remainder of the heart operates in an unrestricted manner. Thus, only the specific surgery location is immobilized. This is all that is required for a successful surgery and the entire heart need not be immobilized. The heart retractor of the present invention also lifts the heart in a manner that permits unrestricted operation of the heart as well.
Referring specifically to
Retractor 10 further includes a fine support means for immobilizing selected portions of the heart while permitting non-immobilized portions to move in a manner that continues heart operation. This fine support means includes a plurality of rigid arms 80 each being fixed at one end thereof to anchor 68 and having a heart-attaching element 82 thereon, such as at the outer end thereof. As used herein, the term “rigid” is a relative term and means that the arms are rigid enough whereby the force of the heart won't move them. But they can be adjustable such as being formed of a wire-wound gooseneck or soft metal which allows each arm to be individually shaped according to the needs of the attachment location. The heart-attaching elements can be suction attachment points, such as suction cups that are fluidically connected to manifold 70. Other means of attaching the elements to the heart can be used as well, without departing from the scope of the present disclosure, as will occur to those skilled in the art based on the teaching of this disclosure. Examples of other such elements include glue, sutures, clamps, shallow pins, pincers or the like, with attachment points being located on the arm as suitable. The rigid arms secure small or fine areas of the heart in place with respect to gross element 52 while permitting the heart to move as required to continue unabated cardiac output. Support means 50 further includes a plurality of flexible support arms 84 each fixed at one end thereof to anchor 68 and having a heart-attaching element 86 on the outer end thereof. Elements 86 can be suction elements similar to the just-discussed elements 82. Flexible arms 84 can be adjusted to secure the heart in the most advantageous locations whereby the heart can continue to operate without undue restriction.
The rigid support arms can be located on one side of the heart so the heart can beat “away” from the rigid support arms as is best indicated in
Therefore, broadly, the overall retractor comprises a main support which includes the arms, a hub and a stationary member, such as a table top, the floor or the like; a gross support which includes the apex cup and fine support means which regionally immobilizes portions of the heart while leaving other regions of the heart free to operate in an unabated manner to maintain heart output during the surgical procedure. The fine support means can include the rigid arms as well as the surgery target immobilizing means. In this manner, the heart is supported regionally yet operates to maintain blood flow during coronary surgery.
Referring to
An alternative form of the retractor is disclosed in
Retractor 10′ is inserted through a minimally invasive port 150 defined in a patient between ribs R and manipulated as necessary to engage and support a heart.
Retractor 10′ is shown in
As was discussed above, during operation of the heart, the left ventricle is a conical shaped cavity narrowest at the apex. It shortens both in length and in diameter during a pumping stroke (contraction). Since the volume of blood displaced is more dependent on the reduction in diameter (square) than the shortening in length (first power), any measure which reduces the diameter of shortening is very detrimental. Also, the right ventricle is attached to the left ventricle and is considerably thinner and less powerful. Suction attachments to this part of the heart which would impede the shortening of muscle may be poorly tolerated. The invention disclosed and taught herein uses a series of linked attachments to the heart. Attachments which are near the artery to be bypassed are paired on opposite sides of the artery and do not move—they immobilize the artery and therefore the muscle in the target region. A lifting suction is applied at the apex of the heart. If this were the only site of lifting, the heart would be stretched and there would be no diameter left. Thus, no blood could be ejected. However, this invention adds additional heart attaching elements that are attached to the heart to lift it. These attachment points would be mobile in that they could allow the heart to move inward and reduce the diameter and eject blood. The key to the invention is the linking of lifting (both at the apex and around the circumference of the heart) and regional immobilization which stops one part around the circumference from moving and therefore allows easy suturing.
As discussed above, it could be important in some cases to account for variations between individual hearts. A retractor 10A shown in
Gross weight support means 200 includes two wings 206 and 208 which are adjustably connected together at their proximal ends by a fastener 210. Fastener 210 includes a hub 212 that frictionally engages the wings. A hand wheel 214 is threaded onto a fastener 216 to tighten the hub against the wings to hold the wings in a desired position. The wings can move from an angular orientation, such as shown in
Regional support of the heart is provided by means 202 which includes fine support elements, such as element 218 having a malleable arm 220 and an element 222 attached to the heart, such as by suction, as well as a target immobilizing means 224. Target immobilizing means includes a U-shaped heart engaging element 226 attached to a support rod 228 that is mounted on the main support means, such as on arm 204. Retractor 10A has rod 208 mounted near hub 210; however, other forms of the retractor, such as retractor 10B shown in
It is understood that while certain forms of the present invention have been illustrated and described herein, it is not to be limited to the specific forms or arrangements of parts described and shown.
The present application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/403,193 filed Mar. 31, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,969,349, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/025,941 filed Dec. 20, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,726,622, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 09/441,542 filed Nov. 16, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,361,493, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 08/936,184 filed Sep. 17, 1997, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,019,722. This application claims priority to U.S. application Ser. Nos. 08/936,184, 09/441,542, 10/025,941, and 10/403,193, each of which are incorporated herein by reference thereto, in their entireties. U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,019,722; 6,361,493 and 6,726,622 are also hereby incorporated by reference thereto, in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
452131 | Haughawout | May 1891 | A |
810675 | Richter | Jan 1906 | A |
1706500 | Smith | Mar 1929 | A |
2082782 | Allen | Jun 1937 | A |
2296793 | Kirschbaum | Sep 1942 | A |
2590527 | Fluck | Mar 1952 | A |
2693795 | Grieshaber | Nov 1954 | A |
2863444 | Winsten | Dec 1958 | A |
3361133 | Kimberley et al. | Jan 1968 | A |
3392722 | Jorgensen | Jul 1968 | A |
3466079 | Mammel | Sep 1969 | A |
3584822 | Oram | Jun 1971 | A |
3683926 | Suzuki | Aug 1972 | A |
3720433 | Rosfelder | Mar 1973 | A |
3783873 | Jacobs | Jan 1974 | A |
3807406 | Rafferty et al. | Apr 1974 | A |
3858926 | Ottenhues | Jan 1975 | A |
3882855 | Shulte et al. | May 1975 | A |
3912317 | Ohnaka | Oct 1975 | A |
3916909 | Kletschka et al. | Nov 1975 | A |
3983863 | Janke et al. | Oct 1976 | A |
4047532 | Phillips et al. | Sep 1977 | A |
4048987 | Hurson | Sep 1977 | A |
4049000 | Williams | Sep 1977 | A |
4049002 | Kletschka et al. | Sep 1977 | A |
4049484 | Priest et al. | Sep 1977 | A |
4052980 | Grams et al. | Oct 1977 | A |
4094484 | Galione et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
4096853 | Weigand | Jun 1978 | A |
4096864 | Kletschka et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
4217890 | Owens | Aug 1980 | A |
4226228 | Shin et al. | Oct 1980 | A |
4230119 | Blum | Oct 1980 | A |
4300564 | Furihata | Nov 1981 | A |
4306561 | de Medinaceli | Dec 1981 | A |
4350160 | Kolesov et al. | Sep 1982 | A |
4366819 | Kaster | Jan 1983 | A |
4368736 | Kaster | Jan 1983 | A |
4421107 | Estes et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4428368 | Torii | Jan 1984 | A |
4434791 | Darnell | Mar 1984 | A |
4457300 | Budde | Jul 1984 | A |
4461284 | Fackler | Jul 1984 | A |
4492229 | Grunwald | Jan 1985 | A |
4617916 | LeVahn et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4627421 | Symbas et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4637377 | Loop | Jan 1987 | A |
4646747 | Lundback | Mar 1987 | A |
4688570 | Kramer et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4702230 | Pelta | Oct 1987 | A |
D293470 | Adler | Dec 1987 | S |
4718418 | L'Esperance, Jr. | Jan 1988 | A |
4726356 | Santilli et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4726358 | Brady | Feb 1988 | A |
4736749 | Lundback | Apr 1988 | A |
4747395 | Brief | May 1988 | A |
4754746 | Cox | Jul 1988 | A |
4803984 | Narayanan et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4808163 | Laub | Feb 1989 | A |
4827926 | Carol | May 1989 | A |
4829985 | Couetil | May 1989 | A |
4841967 | Chang et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4852552 | Chaux | Aug 1989 | A |
4854318 | Solem et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4858552 | Glatt et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4863133 | Bonnell | Sep 1989 | A |
4865019 | Phillips | Sep 1989 | A |
4884559 | Collins | Dec 1989 | A |
4904012 | Nishiguchi et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4925443 | Heilman et al. | May 1990 | A |
4949707 | LeVahn et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4949927 | Madocks et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4955896 | Freeman | Sep 1990 | A |
4957477 | Lundback | Sep 1990 | A |
4962758 | Lasner et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4971037 | Pelta | Nov 1990 | A |
4973300 | Wright | Nov 1990 | A |
4989587 | Farley | Feb 1991 | A |
4991578 | Cohen | Feb 1991 | A |
4993862 | Pelta | Feb 1991 | A |
5009660 | Clapham | Apr 1991 | A |
5011469 | Buckberg et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5019086 | Neward | May 1991 | A |
5025779 | Bugge | Jun 1991 | A |
5036867 | Berggren et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5037428 | Picha et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5052373 | Michelson | Oct 1991 | A |
5053041 | Ansari et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5080088 | LeVahn | Jan 1992 | A |
5098369 | Heilman et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5119804 | Anstadt | Jun 1992 | A |
5125395 | Adair | Jun 1992 | A |
5131905 | Grooters | Jul 1992 | A |
5133724 | Wilson, Jr. et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5139517 | Corral | Aug 1992 | A |
5150706 | Cox et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5152777 | Goldberg et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5159921 | Hoover | Nov 1992 | A |
RE34150 | Santilli et al. | Dec 1992 | E |
5167223 | Koros et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5171254 | Sher | Dec 1992 | A |
5192070 | Nagai et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5196003 | Bilweis | Mar 1993 | A |
5231974 | Giglio et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5256132 | Snyders | Oct 1993 | A |
5268640 | Du et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5287861 | Wilk | Feb 1994 | A |
5290082 | Palmer et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5293863 | Zhu et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5300087 | Knoepfler | Apr 1994 | A |
5318013 | Wilk | Jun 1994 | A |
5336252 | Cochen | Aug 1994 | A |
5348259 | Blanco et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5363882 | Chikama | Nov 1994 | A |
5382756 | Dagan | Jan 1995 | A |
5383840 | Heilman et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5417709 | Slater | May 1995 | A |
5425705 | Evard et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5437651 | Todd et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5452733 | Sterman et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5453078 | Valentine et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5467763 | McMahon et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5480425 | Ogilive | Jan 1996 | A |
5484391 | Buckman, Jr. et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5498256 | Furnish | Mar 1996 | A |
5503617 | Jako | Apr 1996 | A |
5509890 | Kazama | Apr 1996 | A |
5512037 | Russell et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5514075 | Moll et al. | May 1996 | A |
5514076 | Ley | May 1996 | A |
5520610 | Giglio et al. | May 1996 | A |
5522819 | Graves et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5529571 | Daniel | Jun 1996 | A |
5536251 | Evard et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5547458 | Ortiz et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5569274 | Rapacki et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5571074 | Buckman, Jr. et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5571215 | Sterman et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5573496 | McPherson et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5582580 | Buckman, Jr. et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5607421 | Jeevanandam et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5607446 | Beehler et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5613937 | Garrison et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5632746 | Middleman et al. | May 1997 | A |
5651378 | Matheny et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5662300 | Michelson | Sep 1997 | A |
5667480 | Knight et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5713951 | Garrison et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5727569 | Benetti et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5728151 | Garrison et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5730757 | Benetti et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5735290 | Sterman et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5749892 | Vierra et al. | May 1998 | A |
5755660 | Tyagi | May 1998 | A |
5766151 | Valley et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5772583 | Wright et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5782746 | Wright | Jul 1998 | A |
5795291 | Koros et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5797960 | Stevens et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5799661 | Boyd et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5807243 | Vierra et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5813410 | Levin | Sep 1998 | A |
5818231 | Smith | Oct 1998 | A |
5836311 | Borst et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5864275 | Ohashi et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5865730 | Fox et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5885271 | Hamilton et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5888247 | Benetti | Mar 1999 | A |
5891017 | Swindle et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5894843 | Benetti et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5899425 | Corey Jr. et al. | May 1999 | A |
5906607 | Taylor et al. | May 1999 | A |
5908378 | Kovacs et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5921979 | Kovacs et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5927284 | Borst et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5947896 | Sherts et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5957835 | Anderson et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5967973 | Sherts et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5976069 | Navia et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5976080 | Farascioni et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5984864 | Fox et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6013027 | Khan et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6015378 | Borst et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6015427 | Mueller et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6019722 | Spence et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6032672 | Taylor | Mar 2000 | A |
6033362 | Cohn | Mar 2000 | A |
6036641 | Taylor et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6042539 | Harper et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6110187 | Donlon | Aug 2000 | A |
6139492 | Vierra et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6149583 | Vierra et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6159201 | Hamilton et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6183486 | Snow et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6210323 | Gilhuly et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6213940 | Sherts et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6231585 | Takahashi et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6251065 | Kochamba | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6264605 | Scirica et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6315717 | Benetti et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6328688 | Borst et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6334843 | Borst et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6336898 | Borst et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6338712 | Spence et al. | Jan 2002 | B2 |
6346077 | Taylor et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6350229 | Borst et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6361493 | Spence et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6364826 | Borst et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6371906 | Borst et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6371910 | Zwart et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6375611 | Voss et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6390976 | Spence et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6394948 | Borst et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6394951 | Taylor et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6398726 | Romans et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6406424 | Williamson et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6447443 | Keogh et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6458079 | Cohn et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6464629 | Boone et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6464630 | Borst et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6468265 | Evans et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6478029 | Boyd et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6478729 | Rogers et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6482151 | Vierra et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6494211 | Boyd et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6503245 | Palmer et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6506149 | Peng et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6537212 | Sherts et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6565508 | Scirica et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6589166 | Knight et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6592573 | Castaneda et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6607478 | Kochamba et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6610008 | Spence et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6610009 | Spence et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6726622 | Spence et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
20020161295 | Spence et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3138589 | Apr 1983 | DE |
9004513 | Jun 1990 | DE |
4139695 | Jun 1993 | DE |
0 293 760 | Dec 1988 | EP |
0 293 760 | Dec 1988 | EP |
0 293 760 | Dec 1988 | EP |
0 630 629 | May 1994 | EP |
0 668 058 | Feb 1995 | EP |
668 058 | Aug 1995 | EP |
0 820 721 | Jul 1997 | EP |
0 791 329 | Aug 1997 | EP |
0 791 330 | Aug 1997 | EP |
0 820 721 | Jan 1998 | EP |
168216 | Sep 1921 | GB |
2 233 561 | Jan 1991 | GB |
2 267 827 | Dec 1993 | GB |
938967 | Jul 1982 | SU |
WO 8704081 | Jul 1987 | WO |
WO 8800481 | Jan 1988 | WO |
WO 9414383 | Jul 1994 | WO |
WO 9418881 | Sep 1994 | WO |
WO 9501757 | Jan 1995 | WO |
WO 9515715 | Jun 1995 | WO |
WO 9517127 | Jun 1995 | WO |
WO 9600033 | Jan 1996 | WO |
WO 9640354 | Dec 1996 | WO |
WO 9710753 | Mar 1997 | WO |
WO 9726828 | Jul 1997 | WO |
WO 9740752 | Nov 1997 | WO |
WO 9837814 | Sep 1998 | WO |
WO 9849944 | Nov 1998 | WO |
WO 9960929 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO 9960930 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO 0010466 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO 0158362 | Aug 2001 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050148825 A1 | Jul 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10403193 | Mar 2003 | US |
Child | 11063478 | US | |
Parent | 10025941 | Dec 2001 | US |
Child | 10403193 | US | |
Parent | 09441542 | Nov 1999 | US |
Child | 10025941 | US | |
Parent | 08936184 | Sep 1997 | US |
Child | 09441542 | US |